DM Assessment PARTB Data 1 82772111
DM Assessment PARTB Data 1 82772111
DM Assessment PARTB Data 1 82772111
Assesment details
A model structure and data for a stylised testing intervention are provided in the following worksheets
· Program the decision model
· Perform sensitivity analysis
· Report the results
You will NOT submit this MS Excel file, but will be required to write a short a report of your findings b
Submission
Part B – You should, produce a short report of the results from your programming and analysis (up t
i. You must use the following headings:
• Results – Present base case results and sensitivity analysis (guide: ~800 w
• Conclusions – Present a short conclusion for decision making based on t
• References - use consistently and as per the referencing guidance
ii. You should use appropriate tables and figures to present data - ensure they are legible an
iii. Use appropriate academic referencing, using Harvard referencing style, where appropria
Worksheets
Introduction - Overview of assessment details
Concpetual model - A diagram and infomration depciting the concpetual model structure (Decision Tre
Data - input parameter information
Notes
Read the Decision Problem on the 'conceptual model' sheet carefully to understand required outcome
You can create new worksheets and edit this spreadsheet as you see fit or construct the model in anot
Make sure you use all the data provided to run your model
You can use Macros and VBA if you see fit
This is a hypothetical model simplified for educational purposes but is based on similar models in the p
Decision Modleling
vided in the following worksheets. As per the assessment brief you should:
Model summary
The model charts patients at 1 month (typically sufficient time for the initial inpatient episode to have
symptoms to have concluded). After admission to hospital patients can either begin antibiotics, or not
better decsions about the appropriateness of antibiotics and reduce the liklihood individuals will exper
effects and reduces complications.
Model Structure
Model - Decision tree
Time horizon - 12 month
Cost perspective - health care payer (Canadian Dollars)
Antibiotics started
Testing strategy
r the initial inpatient episode to have concluded) and 12 months (sufficient time for infection and
nts can either begin antibiotics, or not, following testing or usual clinical practice. The test helps to make
uce the liklihood individuals will experience adverse reactions. Use of the test therefore has mortality
Dead
Dead Dead
Alive Alive
Dead
s not started
Dead Dead
Dead Dead
Alive Alive
Dead
s not started
Dead Dead
Clinical parameters
Input Value (mean) Standard error
Mortality
1 month follow-up
Baseline (current practice) mortality 0.15 0.02
Relative risk (RR) testing strategy 0.9 0.03
12 month follow-up
Mortality after complications 0.3 0.06
Mortality no complications 0.05 0.01
Complications
Baseline (current practice) probability 0.25 0.04
Relative risk (RR) testing strategy 0.75 0.12
Antibiotic initiation
Baseline (current practice) 0.85 0.07
Relative risk (RR) testing strategy 0.65 0.09
Outcome parameters
Input Value Standard error
Alive at 1 month (QALY) 0.1 NA
Alive at 12 months (QALY) 0.75 NA
QALY decrement for complications -0.05 NA
Notes
95% confidence
interval can be
computed by mean
value +/- 1.96 x S.E
Notes
at 1 month
at 1 month
at 1 month
Notes