Social Robots
Social Robots
Social Robots
Task Performance
In
Emerging Technologies in CpE
Submitted by:
Josielyn L. Taro
La Ereyka Piedad
Submitted to:
Engr. Mark Haron J. Zarate
A. Payment
Payment parity — reimbursement and coverage for telemedicine services comparable to those
of in-person services — is a big challenge for telehealth. There is no guarantee of payment parity
between telemedicine and in-person health care. Even in the 28 states in which payment parity laws
have been passed, no apparatus exists to enforce it. This could potentially defeat the point of
telemedicine to reduce health care costs and expand access to services, and could also discourage
providers from offering telehealth because there is no guarantee of comparable payment.
B. Misdiagnosis
Misdiagnosis happens often in in-person health care, but the risks increase with telehealth. Add
to this the fact that there is no clear standard of care established by state legislatures, and quality may
be uneven between one provider and the next. Misdiagnosis has the potential to drive up overall costs
to the general health care system as well, because misdiagnoses lead to wrong prescriptions and
treatments. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), one third of antibiotics prescriptions are
already unnecessary. Additionally, if a telehealth service cannot determine a diagnosis, the patient may
be counseled to go to an ER or an urgent care service. If these visits are unnecessary, they may result in
a large cost to both the patient and the system as a whole.
B. Widespread Implementation
The government has been attempting to address patient demand for telehealth by passing
legislation like CONNECT (Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies),
which expands the availability of services provided through telehealth under Medicare.
The challenges of widespread implementation of telemedicine encompass many different areas,
because “telehealth” can refer to so many different things — from robotics to telephone consultations.
Some of the responsibility of implementation resides with the legal system, and rests with the
government. Some is institutional, and rests with local hospitals and health care institutions. Also, some
of the challenges are financial, and require the effective utilization of business strategy and human
resources.
C. Adoption
Health care providers sometimes resist innovation in telemedicine because it creates
competition. Individual providers may resist solutions to licensing barriers because they do not want
competition from another state’s telemedicine network. This resistance is even greater with the
development of nationwide networks.
D. Hype
We are victims of our own hype. We tend to talk about studies and all the wonderful things that
telemedicine can do, but a lot of studies show that some applications of telemedicine do not work or
cost too much. To move telemedicine forward, we have to be realistic about what works and what does
not.
While there are many obstacles that may give us pause, we have already seen some positive
results of the implementation of telemedicine services. For instance, with the introduction of virtual
care there has been a significant decrease in inpatient days and ER use for patients with diabetes.
Because telehealth comprises such a vast quantity of technologies and services, much of its widespread
implementation will be an ongoing experiment to determine best practices. The methods and
technologies that integrate well into health plans will survive, saving money and expanding care in the
long term.
Opportunities/Advantages/Benefits
Telehealth is fueled by digital technologies, which allows us to reimagine the physician visit as a
house call without the travel. The idea of the virtual visit has been around for decades, and telemedicine
has been deployed across specialties and service lines, from primary care to radiology, cardiology to
orthopedics.
Telehealth lends itself well to both the primary care and specialist, allowing them to further
their reach, treating patients wherever there is an Internet connection. Telehealth platforms have
traditionally launched from a health system because they typically have the overhead to purchase large
equipment kiosks and sophisticated digital technology.
Today, telehealth applications are software-as-a-service (SaaS) and as close as the smartphone a
doctor – and their patient – keeps in their pocket or purse. Today’s telehealth platforms no longer
require big upfront overhead costs but are part of monthly subscription packages that are as secure and
HIPAA-compliant as they are affordable.
Let’s look at our top 10 benefits telehealth applications patients and doctors. How can these
new SaaS models be a game changer for clinicians seeking new ways to serve patients?
A. Telehealth increases access to care
Distance and travel time between patients and care providers can limit access to care.
Fortunately, telemedicine can overcome geographic barriers to healthcare, especially for specialized
providers. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for patients in medically underserved
communities and those in rural geographical locations where clinician shortages exist.
Conclusion
Telehealth is a valuable tool that patients can use to be evaluated and treated by health care
providers from wherever they may be. Telemedicine services are often offered at lower costs and make
availability for some to obtain health care easier to achieve. With the use of economic tools, providers
and facilities are determining this to be true. As more Americans are obtaining health care insurance,
there is an increasing need and demand for health care that continues to rise as fewer providers are
available, and telemedicine can provide an expansion to the health care industry. Cost analysis provides
facilities and provides with the significant figures when determining the value of implementing a
telemedicine system. The greatest value associated with telemedicine is not only the lower wait times
and the reduced costs that are achieved but the improvement in patient satisfaction and allowing the
patient more involvement in the care they receive.