(2300133X - Anna
(2300133X - Anna
18 (2019), 167-192
DOI: 10.1515/aupcsm-2017-0013
FOLIA 206
Report of Meeting
18th International Conference on Functional
Equations and Inequalities, Będlewo, Poland,
June 9–15, 2019
1. Abstracts of Talks
Mirosław Adamek On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for F -convex func-
tions
Let I be a nonempty and open interval of R and F : R → R be a fixed function.
A function f : I → R will be called F -convex if
functional equation, focusing on the Ulam’s type stability. The main goal of our
presentation is to talk about morphisms between sets with an algebraic structure
and an order structure, through associated functional equations and inequalities:
we discuss the separation problem for the inequalities and the Hyers-Ulam stability
of the main equation.
References
[1] N.K. Agbeko, On optimal averages, Acta Math. Hung. 63(1-2) (1994), 1–15.
[2] N.K. Agbeko, On the structure of optimal measures and some of its applications,
Publ. Math. Debrecen 46(1-2) (1995), 79–87.
[3] N.K. Agbeko, Stability of maximum preserving functional equations on Banach lat-
tices, Miskolc Math. Notes, 13(2) (2012), 187–196.
[4] N.K. Agbeko and S.S. Dragomir, The extension of some Orlicz space results to the
theory of optimal measure, Math. Nachr. 286(8-9) (2013), 760–771.
[5] N.K. Agbeko, The Hyers-Ulam-Aoki type stability of some functional equation on
Banach lattices, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math. 63(2)(2015), 177–184.
[6] N.K. Agbeko, A remark on a result of Schwaiger, Indag. Math. 28(2) (2017), 268–275.
[7] N.K. Agbeko, W. Fechner and E. Rak, On lattice-valued maps stemming from the
notion of optimal average. Acta Math. Hungar. 152 (2017), 72–83.
Alina Ramona Baias On the best Ulam constant of a third order linear differ-
ence equation
Let X be a Banach space over the field K ∈ {R, C}. We give a result on Ulam
stability for the linear difference equation
[2] A.R. Baias, F. Blaga and D. Popa, Best Ulam constant for a linear difference equation,
Carpathian J. Math. 35 (2019), 13–22.
[3] A.R. Baias and D. Popa, On Ulam stability of a linear difference equation in Banach
spaces, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. DOI: 10.1007/s40840-019-00744-6.
[4] J. Brzdęk, D. Popa and I. Raşa, Hyers Ulam stability with respect to gauges, J. Math.
Anal. Appl. 453 (2017), 620–628.
ϕ(x) = µ̂(x)ϕ(Λx).
References
[1] N.L. Bowers, H.U. Gerber, J.C. Hickman, D.A. Jones and C.J. Nesbitt, Actuarial
Mathematics, The Society of Actuaries, Itasca, Illinois, 1986.
[2] H. Bühlmann, Mathematical Models in Risk Theory, Springer, Berlin, 1970.
[3] H.U. Gerber, An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory, S.S. Huebner Foundation,
R.D. Irwin Inc., Homewood Illinois, 1979.
[4] Zs. Páles, Characterization of quasideviation means, Acta. Math. Sci. Hungar. 40
(1982), 243–260.
[5] Zs. Páles, General inequalities for quasideviation means, Aequationes Math. 36
(1988), 32–56.
[6] T. Rolski, H. Schmidli, V. Schmidt and J. Teugels, Stochastic Processes for Insurance
and Finance, John Wiley & Sons, New York 1999.
given space will be analyzed as well along with some characterizations of inner
product spaces with the aid of suitable iterations of the difference operators.
Delta-convex mappings between normed linear spaces provide a generalization
of functions which are representable as a difference of two convex functions to the
case of vector valued maps. Following L. Veselý and L. Zajíček, (Delta-convex map-
pings between Banach spaces and applications, Dissertationes Math. 289, Polish
Scientific Publishers, Warszawa, 1989) we show that this class of mappings has very
good properties proving that a generalization proposed is well established. Strict
connections with the Hyers-Ulam stability in the theory of functional equations
and inequalities will be revealed. We look also for possibly mild regularity condi-
tions upon the maps whose vector convex differences are controlled by their scalar
counterparts, forcing these maps to be delta-convex. Finally, vector analogues of
the celebrated Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities will also be presented.
af + b
cf + d > 0, g= and q` = (cf + d)p` (` ∈ {1, . . . , n}).
cf + d
where g ∈ L1 ([0, 1]) and f1 , . . . , fN : [0, 1] → [0, 1] are functions satisfying some
extra conditions. The results we are going to present were recently published in
[2].
References
[1] K. Nikodem, On -invariant measures and a functional equation, Czechoslovak Math.
J. 41(116) (4) (1991) 565–569.
[2] J. Morawiec and T. Zürcher, An application of functional equations for generating
ε-invariant measures, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 476 (2019), 759-772.
Zsolt Páles Optimal error functions for approximately monotone and convex
functions
Let I be a nonempty open real interval and let `(I) ∈ ]0, ∞] denote its length.
Given a nonnegative error function Φ : [0, `(I)[ → R+ , a function f : I → R will be
called a Φ-monotone function if, for all x, y ∈ I with x ≤ y,
We say that a function f : I → R is Φ-convex if, for all x, y ∈ I and t ∈ [0, 1], it
satisfies the inequality
f (tx + (1 − t)y) ≤ tf (x) + (1 − t)f (y) + tΦ((1 − t)|x − y|) + (1 − t)Φ((t|x − y|).
Teresa Rajba On some inequalities for Bernstein operators and convex functions
For n ∈ N, the Bernstein basic polynomials are given as follows
n i
bn,i (x) = x (1 − x)n−i , i = 0, 1, . . . , n, x ∈ [0, 1],
i
the classical Bernstein operators Bn : C([0, 1]) → C([0, 1]), are defined by
n
X
i
(Bn f )(x) = bn,i (x)f n , x ∈ [0, 1].
i=0
for each convex function f ∈ C([0, 1]) and for all x, y ∈ [0, 1]. The proof of inequal-
ity (1) was given in [2]. Raşa [4] remarked, that (1) is equivalent to
n X
X n i + j
(B2n f )(x) + (B2n f )(y) ≥ 2 bn,i (x)bn,j (y) f . (2)
i=0 j=0
2n
Ioan Raşa Functional equations and inequalities for the index of coincidence
Let (p0 (x), p1 (x), . . .) be a probability distribution depending
P∞ on a real pa-
2
rameter x. The associated index of coincidence is S(x) := k=0 (pk (x)) . The
Rényi entropy and the Tsallis entropy are defined by R(x) := − log S(x) and
T (x) := 1 − S(x). Starting with the binomial distribution, we establish functional
equations and inequalities and use them to investigate convexity properties of the
functions S(x), R(x) and T (x). Applications and new open problems are men-
tioned.
Reference
[1] I. Raşa, Convexity properties of some entropies (II), Preprint 2019.
Debmalya Sain Norm attainment set of a bounded linear operator between Ba-
nach spaces
It is a topic of current interest in the geometry of Banach spaces to study
the norm attainment set of a bounded linear operator between Banach spaces. In
this talk, I would like to explore the various facets of this problem, including the
case of bounded linear operators between Hilbert spaces and Banach spaces. We
would show that it is possible to completely characterize Euclidean spaces among
Minkowski spaces, in terms of the operator norm attainment set. We would further
explore the norm attainment set of a bounded linear operator between Banach
Theorem
If continuous functions f1 , . . . , fM : R → C satisfy the functional equation
M
X n
X
fi (x + bi y)Pi (x, y) = uj (x)vj (y), bi 6= bj for i 6= j (1)
i=0 j=1
and in this form are introduced by Keneth Stolarsky in [1]. There are several
papers attempting to define an extension of the class E to n, n > 2 variables [1].
In this talk we shall expose two possible explicit formulae of Stolarsky means
in n variables which preserve its main properties and coincide for n = 2.
Definition 1
Let Xn = (x1 , x2 , ..., xn ) ∈ Rn+ . Then,
1
r2 xns ns ns s
n(s−r)
1 + x2 + ... + xn − n(x1 x2 ...xn )
er,s (Xn ) = er,s (x1 , x2 , ..., xn ) := 2 nr
s x1 + xnr nr
2 + ... + xn − n(x1 x2 ...xn )
r
for rs(s − r) 6= 0.
Definition 2
Let An = (a1 , a2 , ..., an ), Xn = (x1 , x2 , ..., xn ), Yn = (y1 , y2 , ..., yn ); An , Xn , Yn ∈
Rn+ . Then,
1
r2 a1 (xs1 − y1s )2 + a2 (xs2 − y2s )2 + · · · + an (xsn − yns )2
2(s−r)
n
Er,s (An ; Xn , Yn ) := .
s2 a1 (xr1 − y1r )2 + a2 (xr2 − y2r )2 + · · · + an (xrn − ynr )2
Both extensions are symmetric and monotone increasing in both parameters r and
1
s with er,s (x1 , x2 ) = Er,s (a1 ; x1 , x2 ) = Er,s (x1 , x2 ).
References
[1] K.B. Stolarsky, Generalizations of the logarithmic mean, Math. Mag. 48(2) (1975),
pp. 87-92.
[2] J.K. Merikowski, Extending means of two variables to several variables, J. Ineq. Pure
Appl. Math. 5(3) (2004), Article 65.
[3] S. Simić, On weighted Stolarsky means, Sarajevo J. Math. 7(19) (2011).
t
The reduced process (RL α)t∈N is the iteration of this transformation. In normed
vector spaces, the reduced process converges to the straight line. On the general
affine group Aff(1, R) – which is a Lie group – the reduced process converges to
the geodesic linking the starting point of the curve α with its end point.
References
[1] G.D. Birkhoff, Dynamical Systems, American Mathematical Society Collo-
quium Publications IX. Amsterdam, American Mathematical Society, 1927. DOI:
10.1090/coll/009.
[2] J. Jost, Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis, Universitext. Springer, 1995.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61860-9.
[3] R. Liedl and N. Netzer, Group Theoretic and Differential Geometric Methods for Solv-
ing the Translation Equation, In: European Conference on Iteration Theory (ECIT
87), pp. 240–252. World Scientific Publishing, 1989.
[4] P. Stadler, Curve Shortening by Short Rulers, Journal of Difference Equations and
Applications 22(1) (2015), 22–36. DOI:10.1080/10236198.2015.1073724.
References
[1] M. Cosentino and P. Vetro, Fixed point results for F-contractive mappings of Hardy-
Rogers-type, Filomat 28(4) (2014), 715–722.
[2] S.G. Matthews, Partial metric topology, Research Report 212. Department of Com-
puter Science, University of Warwick, 1992.
[3] S.G. Matthews, Partial metric topology, Proceedings of the 8th Summer Conference
on General Topology and Applications, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 728 (1994), 183–
197.
[4] B. Samet, C. Vetro and P. Vetro, Fixed point theorems for α − ψ-contractive type
mappings, Nonlinear Anal 75 (2012), 2154–2165.
[5] D. Wardowski, Fixed points of new type of contractive mappings in complete metric
space, Fixed Point Theory Appl, 2012.
holds.
We provide new, elementary proofs of the above theorems.
References
[1] H. Brunn, Nachtrag zu dem Aufsatz über Mittelwertssätze für bestimmte Integrale,
Münchener Berichte (1903), 205–212.
[2] A. Clausing, Disconjugacy and Integral Inequalities, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 260
(1980), 293–307.
[3] G.H. Hardy, J.E. Littlewood and G. Polya, Inequalities, Moscow, 1948 (in Russian).
[4] V.I. Levin, S.B. Stečkin, Inequalities, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. (2) 14 (1960), 1–29.
[5] P.R. Mercer, A note on inequalities due to Clausing and Levin-Stečkin, J. Math. Ineq.
11(1) (2017), 163–166.
[6] A. Witkowski, Inequalities of Levin-Stečkin, Clausing and Chebyshev revisited, Ele-
mente der Mathematik, to appear.
References
[1] H. Bühlmann, B. Gagliardi, H. Gerber and E. Straub, Some inequalities for stop-loss
premiums, ASTIN Bulletin 9 (1977), 75–83.
[2] J. Chudziak, D. Głazowska, J. Jarczyk and W. Jarczyk, On weighted quasi-arithmetic
means which are convex, Math. Inequal. Appl., in press.
[3] Zs. Páles, General inequalities for quasideviation means, Aequationes Math. 36
(1988), 32–56.
[4] Zs. Páles and P. Pasteczka, On the best Hardy constant for quasi-arithmetic means
and homogeneous deviation means, Math. Inequal. Appl. 21 (2018), 585–599.
were considered. In this talk, we are changing the derivatives fn0 to some other
functions gn , looking for solutions ϕ ∈ L1 ([0, 1]) of
N
X
ϕ(x) = |gn (x)|ϕ(fn (x)) + g(x).
n=1
This is not only a cosmetic change. We need new methods to tackle this kind of
equations.
1. Remark
This remark is related to a joint work with Moshe Goldberg and the talk de-
livered during the 57th Symposium on Functional Equations in Jastarnia, Poland
(June 2-9, 2019), based on papers [1, 2].
For a (real or complex) vector space X we use the standard notions of a norm
and a seminorm (the latter need not be positive definite). Moreover, a non-zero
seminorm which is not a norm is called a proper seminorm.
We consider the continuity of seminorms with respect to norm-generated to-
pologies. It can be noticed that a seminorm can be either ubiquitously continuous
or ubiquitously discontinuous with respect to any norm-topology. As proved in [1],
for a finite-dimensional space X any seminorm S on X is continuous with respect
to the unique norm-topology on X (in other words S is continuous with respect to
any norm on X). For infinite-dimensional spaces it was proved in [2] that for any
non-zero seminorm S there exists a norm with respect to which S is everywhere
continuous and there exists a norm with respect to which S is everywhere discon-
tinuous.
Now, one could raise a question whether it can happen that for some norm N
on an infinite-dimensional space X all the seminorms defined on X are continuous
with respect to the topology generated by N . It turns out, however, that the answer
to the above question is negative. Each norm on an infinite-dimensional space
admits a proper seminorm which is discontinuous in the topology of the original
norm. Moreover, each norm on an infinite-dimensional space admits another norm,
discontinuous with respect to the original one.
References
[1] M. Goldberg, Continuity of seminorms on finite-dimensional vector spaces, Linear
Algebra Appl. 515 (2017), 175–179.
[2] J. Chmieliński and M. Goldberg, Continuity and discontinuity of seminorms on
infinite-dimensional vector spaces, Linear Algebra Appl. 578 (2019), 153–158.
Jacek Chmieliński
2. Problem
Let I ⊂ R be an interval, n ∈ N, and M : I n → I n be a mean-type mapping,
i.e. min(x1 , . . . , xn ) ≤ Mk (x1 , . . . , xn ) ≤ max(x1 , . . . , xn ) for all (x1 , . . . , xn ) ∈ I n .
Moreover assume that each Mk is symetric. A mean K : I n → I is called M-
invariant if K ◦ M = K.
Conjecture
Let n ∈ N and M : I n → I n be a mean-type mapping such that
max M(v) − min M(v) < max v − min v
for every nonconstant vector v ∈ I n . Then there exists at most one continuous
M-invariant mean.
Recently it was proved that for n = 2 this statement is valid.
Paweł Pasteczka
3. Problem
Let Bn be the classical Bernstein operators defined by
n
X k
Bn f (x) = f bn,k (x), f ∈ C[0, 1], x ∈ [0, 1],
n
k=0
Conjecture 1
B2n wn is a convex function.
2. Let r ∈ [0, 1) be given. Consider the function
n
X
Fn,r (x) := bn,k (x)bn,k (x − r), x ∈ [r, 1].
k=0
Conjecture 2
Fn,r is a log-convex function.
3. C.A. Micchelli suggested the following property
f ∈ C[0, 1] log-concave ⇒ Bn f log-concave, n ≥ 1.
A proof was given by T.N.T. Goodman in 1989. A stronger property is expressed
as follows
Conjecture 3
X n−1 n j i
f ∈ C[0, 1] log-concave ⇒ (n − 1 − i)f ∆21 f
i j n n n
i+j=h
0≤i≤n−1
0≤j≤n
i j
−(n − j)∆11 f ∆11 f ≤ 0,
n n n n
for all n ≥ 1, h ∈ {0, 1, . . . , 2n − 2}.
Ioan Raşa
4. Problem
Let G be a commutative topological group. Find the continuous linearly inde-
pendent solutions f, g : G → C of the functional equation
f (x)[g(x + y) + g(x − y)] = g(x)[f (x + y) + f (x − y)].
5. Problem
Let G be a commutative topological group. The subspace V in the space C(G)
of all continuous complex valued functions is called bi-translation invariant if for
each f in V we have that the function x 7→ f (x + y) + f (x − y) is in V for each
y in V . Clearly, if V is translation invariant and linear, then it is bi-translation
invariant, but the converse is not necessarily true. The problem is to describe
bi-translation invariant linear spaces of functions which are closed with respect
to compact convergence and possibly have some additional properties, like finite
dimensionality, etc.
László Székelyhidi
Corollary 1 ([2])
Let a function f of two real variables be an exponential polynomial when one of
the variables is fixed, and assume that f (x, x + h) is an exponential polynomial of
x, for each h ∈ M , where M is a set of cardinality continuum. Then f (x, y) is an
exponential polynomial in x, y.
Ekaterina Shulman
3. List of Participants
1. ADAMEK Mirosław, University of Bielsko-Biala, Bielsko-Biała, Poland,
email: [email protected]
2. AGBEKO Nutefe Kwami, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, Hungary,
email: [email protected]
3. ALESTALO Pekka, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland,
email: [email protected]
4. BAIAS Alina, Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Cluj Napoca, Romania,
email: [email protected]
5. BARON Karol, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland,
email: [email protected]
6. BRILLOUËT-BELLUOT Nicole, Ecole Centrale de Nantes, Nantes, France,
email: [email protected]
7. BRZDĘK Janusz, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland,
email: [email protected]
8. CǍDARIU-BRǍILOIU Liviu, Politehnica University of Timisoara, Romania,
email: [email protected]
9. CHMIELIŃSKI Jacek, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Kraków, Poland,
email: [email protected]
10. CHUDZIAK Jacek, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland,
email: [email protected]
11. CZERNI Marek, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Kraków, Poland,
email: [email protected]
12. DERĘGOWSKA Beata, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Kraków, Poland,
email: [email protected]
13. FECHNER Włodzimierz, Lodz University of Technology, Łódź, Poland,
email: [email protected]
14. FÖRG-ROB Wolfgang, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria,
email: [email protected]
15. GER Roman, Silesian University of Katowice, Katowice, Poland,
email: [email protected], [email protected]
16. GOLDBERG Moshe, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel,
email: [email protected]
17. GRÜNWALD Richárd, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary,
email: [email protected]
18. HALTER-KOCH Franz, University of Graz, Graz, Poland,
email: [email protected]
19. HORVÁTH László, University of Pannonia, Veszprém,Hungary,
email: [email protected]
20. JABŁOŃSKA Eliza, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Kraków, Poland,
email: [email protected]
21. LEŚNIAK Zbigniew, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Kraków, Poland,
email: [email protected]
22. LI Lin, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China,
email: [email protected], [email protected]
23. MAKAGON Andrzej, Hampton University, Hampton, United States,
email: [email protected]
24. MALEJKI Renata, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Kraków, Poland,
email: [email protected]