Final REVIEW RESEARCH PROJECT
Final REVIEW RESEARCH PROJECT
Final REVIEW RESEARCH PROJECT
SUBMITTED BY
TO
(Mentor-In-Charge)
MAY, 2024
Title: Review of Research Methods and Data Analysis for "Assessment of
Wayfinding System of Selected Libraries in Nigeria to Improve Navigability in
the Design of Public Library" in Osogbo, Nigeria.
Introduction
This review evaluates the research methods and data analysis methods used in the project
"Assessment of Wayfinding System of Selected Libraries in Nigeria to Improve Navigability in
the Design of Public Library" in Osogbo, Nigeria to examine the effectiveness of existing
wayfinding systems in selected libraries in Nigeria.
Research Questions.
The following research questions guided the study:
1. To what extent are the wayfinding systems in Nigeria libraries effective?
2. What are the necessary facilities to be improved upon in order to ease users’ accessibility
and navigation within the library?
Aim & Objectives
This study aims to improve navigability in the design of a public library to ensure efficient usage.
The study's specific objectives are to:
1. Examine the effectiveness of existing wayfinding systems in selected libraries in Nigeria.
2. Appraise the facilities available in selected libraries in Nigeria.
3. Propose a design of Ata-oja Library, Osogbo.
Research Design:
Despite being designed for user navigation, public libraries often prioritize book storage over user
experience, leading to inefficient layouts. There is a lack of empirical research on public library
wayfinding and user navigation. To address this, a case study methodology was chosen, employing
a multimethod approach including document analysis, observation, questionnaires, and validation
review. This combination will provide a comprehensive understanding of user wayfinding in the
library entry area, offering a more complete picture than a single-method approach. However, more
advanced statistical techniques, such as correlation analysis or factor analysis, could have been
employed to identify patterns and relationships.
1. The data collection method is comprehensive and multifaceted, involving both physical
visits and online research
2. The use of specially designed field forms ensures systematic and detailed data collection
3. The evaluation criteria include relevant aspects of wayfinding design, energy efficiency,
and building facilities
4. The inclusion of secondary data collection ensures a more thorough analysis of
accessibility performance
5. The methodology appears well-suited for the research objectives, allowing for a detailed
and comparative analysis of public libraries' wayfinding design and accessibility features.
Research Population
Content Analysis: used to analyze wayfinding tools found in documents and routes observed
during the study
Data Integration: used to combine and synthesize the data from various sources
Review:
i. The use of content analysis is appropriate for analyzing textual and visual data from
documents and observations
ii. The addition of data integration allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the data
by combining different data sources
iii. The analytic methodologies are well-suited for a case study design, allowing for an in-
depth examination of the wayfinding tools and routes in the public library
iv. The approach appears systematic and thorough, enabling the researcher to identify patterns,
themes, and insights into the library's wayfinding design and user navigation.
Ethical Considerations:
The study ensured confidentiality and anonymity of participants, adhering to ethical standards.
However, informed consent could have been obtained more explicitly, and participants' rights
could have been more clearly outlined.
Strengths:
➢ Multimethod approach provided a comprehensive understanding
➢ Observations and interviews provided rich, qualitative insights
➢ Thematic analysis identified key themes and patterns
Limitations:
➢ Reliance on self-reported data
➢ Limited generalizability due to small sample size
➢ Lack of diversity in interview participants
Conclusion:
The study's research methods have both strengths and limitations. Future studies could improve
upon the design and data collection methods to provide more robust findings.
Recommendations:
➢ Use a mixed-methods approach incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data
➢ Employ more objective data collection methods (e.g., experimental design)
➢ Use more advanced statistical techniques to analyze data
➢ Increase sample size and diversity for greater generalizability
By evaluating the research methods used in this project, we can identify areas for improvement
and enhance the validity and reliability of future studies on wayfinding systems in libraries.
Title: Review of Research Methods and Data Analysis For "Assessment of New
Building Technologies for Mixed Use Buildings” Ikoyi Lagos.
Introduction
This review evaluates the research methods used in the project "Assessment of New Building
Technologies for Mixed-Use Buildings" to assess their strengths and limitations.
However, mixed-use development success depends on careful consideration of factors such as:
By considering these factors, mixed-use projects can thrive and contribute to more sustainable and
vibrant urban environments.
2. What are the economic and environmental benefits and drawbacks of using new building
technologies for mixed-use buildings?
3. How do regulatory frameworks and standards affect the usability of the materials and methods?
Aim
To examine the usability of new building technologies in mixed-use buildings and to develop best
practices.
Research Design
The study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative data.
This design is appropriate for exploring the complex aspects of new building technologies and
their applications in mixed-use buildings.
Strengths:
➢ Mixed-methods approach provided a comprehensive understanding
➢ Literature review and case studies provided a solid foundation for the research
➢ Expert interviews added valuable insights from professionals
Limitations:
➢ Small sample size for the case studies and expert interviews
➢ Limited generalizability due to the specific focus on mixed-use buildings
➢ Potential bias in the thematic analysis due to the subjective nature of the coding process
Conclusion:
The research methods used in this project were appropriate for exploring the complex aspects of
new building technologies in mixed-use buildings. The mixed-methods approach provided a
comprehensive understanding, and the combination of literature reviews, case studies, and expert
interviews offered a well-rounded perspective. However, the small sample size and limited
generalizability are limitations that should be considered in future research.
Recommendations:
➢ Increase the sample size for the case studies and expert interviews
➢ Expand the scope to include other types of buildings or contexts
➢ Use additional quantitative methods, such as statistical analysis, to complement the
thematic analysis.