FAR - Answer Bank - Q1
FAR - Answer Bank - Q1
44 Financial Accounting and Reporting – IFRS® Standards: Electronic Question Bank ICAEW 2024
Exam 1
1 Calrose Ltd
Marking guide
Marks
Current assets
Inventories 122,400
Trade and other receivables 180,700
303,100
Total assets 2,413,302
Non-current liabilities
Lease liability (W5) 5,288
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 120,300
Lease liability (10,373 + 415)(W5) 5,500
Borrowings (100,000 + 23,500) 123,500
Taxation 16,000
265,300
Total equity and liabilities 2,413,302
46 Financial Accounting and Reporting – IFRS® Standards: Electronic Question Bank ICAEW 2024
WORKINGS
(1) Allocation of expenses
Other
Cost of sales Admin exp operating costs
£ £ £
Per TB 1,405,200 306,900 299,100
Opening inventory 117,600
Closing inventory (122,400)
Government grant 25,000
Depreciation charges (W2) 70,631 71,015
1,471,031 377,915 324,100
(2) Property, plant and equipment
Land and
buildings Plant
£ £
Cost b/f 756,800
Less: Acc depreciation (400,100)
Carrying amount b/f 356,700
Revaluation on 1 January 20X1 1,670,800
Depreciation charges
On machine subject to grant (25,000 20% 6/12) (2,500)
On other plant ((356,700 – 50,000) 20%) (61,340)
On buildings ((1,670,800 – 250,500) ÷ 20) (71,015)
Tutorial note
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the future lease payments. The
lease liability at 31 December 20X1 is £10,788, consisting of a current liability of £5,500 (being
the payment due on 1 January 20X2) and a non-current liability of £5,288 (being the capital
balance outstanding for the year to 31 December 20X2 before interest is applied).
Depreciation over the lease term/useful life of three years £20,373/3 years = £6,791
Carrying amount at 31 December 20X1 = 20,373 – 6,791 = £13,582
1.2 UK GAAP differences re government grant
Calrose Ltd has deducted the grant from the cost of the asset in accordance with its accounting
policy. It has therefore offset the £25,000 government grant against the cost of machine. IAS 20
allows this treatment but also permits the government grant to be separately reported as deferred
income.
Under FRS 102, Calrose Ltd would not have the option to deduct the grant from the cost of the asset.
Instead an entity has the choice to use the performance model or the accrual model. Under the
performance model the grant would be recognised as income when the performance conditions are
met. Here there are no conditions so the grant can be recognised immediately. Assuming Calrose Ltd
would choose to use the accrual model under UK GAAP, the grant would instead be recognised as
deferred income, hence showing the government grant as part of liabilities and then releasing it over
the useful life of the machine. The overall impact on profit is the same as under IAS 20 as instead of
reduced depreciation a deferred income release is made:
£
Other operating income (25,000 × 20% 6/12) 2,500
48 Financial Accounting and Reporting – IFRS® Standards: Electronic Question Bank ICAEW 2024
However, any additional depreciation on revalued non-current assets can be added back to
profits for the purpose of determining distributable profits. Calrose Ltd's distributable profits will
therefore be £549,714 (517,614 + 32,100).
Share capital is a non-distributable reserve, as is the share premium account, as these are not
part of the company's realised profits.
The revaluation surplus is generally an unrealised profit/is only recognised when the asset is sold
and is therefore not distributable.
2 Bomba Ltd
Marking guide
Marks
50 Financial Accounting and Reporting – IFRS® Standards: Electronic Question Bank ICAEW 2024
should be disclosed if the information resulting from that disclosure is material. Although the amount
involved may be relatively small, the transaction is material and so should be disclosed. Roy stating
that no disclosure of the transaction was necessary either calls his integrity into question again, as he
does not wish to disclose this matter, so that the other directors will not become aware of the sale, or
he is lacking in professional competence and due care.
Also, the fact that Roy did not correctly record the disposal of the electric car could indicate a lack of
professional competence and due care. However, it could also point to a lack of independence and
integrity, as if the disposal had been correctly recorded, profit for the year would decrease by £56,000
and his bonus for the year would be reduced. The existence of the bonus, and Roy's own financial
difficulties lead to a clear self-interest threat.
Roy has also failed to record the issue of the irredeemable preference shares correctly. Although this is
a more complex issue, as a Chartered Accountant, he should still be aware of how this matter should
be treated. Posting the cash receipt to revenue and failing to accrue for the dividend has further
overstated profits, by £515,000. Again, this points to a lack of professional competence and due care
or of independence and integrity.
Further possible indications of a lack of integrity or a lack of professional competence and due care is
Roy's failure to adjust opening inventories for the change of accounting policy. Again, failure to do this
has overstated the profit for the year, by £10,500.
There is a possible intimidation threat to Jasmine from Roy as he is her superior, she knows he is in financial
difficulties, and that he is relying on the bonus.
Jasmine should take the following steps:
• On Roy's return, discuss each of the errors found with him, explaining the correct financial
reporting treatment to him.
• If Roy's knowledge appears to be out of date, tactfully suggest that he goes on an update course.
• Ensure the financial statements are corrected.
• If necessary, seek the support of the managing director/the board.
• Document all discussions.
• If she finds herself in a difficult situation, or caught between Roy and the managing director, or
subject to any sort of intimation threat, consult the ICAEW helpline.
Marks
52 Financial Accounting and Reporting – IFRS® Standards: Electronic Question Bank ICAEW 2024
Note: Reconciliation of profit before tax to cash generated from operations
£
Profit before tax 250,600
Amortisation charge 12,500
Depreciation charge 102,300
Increase in inventories (356,200 – 206,300) (149,900)
Decrease in trade and other receivables (145,900 – 198,100) 52,200
Increase in trade and other payables (199,800 – 152,700) 47,100
Cash generated from operations 314,800
WORKINGS
(1) INTANGIBLE ASSETS
£ £
B/d 57,120 CPL 12,500
Cash (β) 112,520
Goodwill (400,000 –
(463,300 80%)) 29,360 C/d 186,500
199,000 199,000
The provision for the claim made by a customer relates to a claim which arose on 1 January 20X1 due
to the delivery of faulty goods to a customer. The provision has been discounted to a present value
using a discount rate of 5%. The claim is expected to be settled in January 20X3.
The warranty provision relates to potential claims under a one year warranty scheme introduced on 1
July 20X1. The provision represents the directors' best estimate of likely claims, using an expected
value.
The provision for the claim relating to the cyber-attack relates to a claim which arose in the previous
financial year when the company was the target of a cyber-attack. Although the claim was initially
expected to be settled for £150,000, lawyers now estimate that it will be settled for £210,000. The
claim is due to come to court shortly.
WORKINGS
(1) Legal claim
50,000 ÷ 1.052 = 45,352
Unwinding of discount = 45,352 5% = 2,268
(2) Warranty provision
(24,000 10%) + (49,000 4%) = 4,360
4 Arborio plc
Marking guide
Marks
54 Financial Accounting and Reporting – IFRS® Standards: Electronic Question Bank ICAEW 2024
Arborio plc
Consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X1
Continuing operations £
Revenue (W1) 1,139,100
Cost of sales (W1) (521,700)
Gross profit 617,400
Operating expenses (W1) (197,650)
Operating profit (W1) 419,750
Investment income (W1) 21,300
Share of profit of associate (W3) 3,680
Profit before tax 444,730
Income tax expense (W1) (167,000)
Profit for the year from continuing operations 277,730
Discontinued operations
Profit for the year from discontinued operations (W6) 40,064
Profit for the period 317,794
Profit attributable to
Owners of Arborio plc (β) 284,512
Non-controlling interests (W2) 33,282
317,794
Consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 20X1 (extract)
Non-controlling
interests
£
At 1 January 20X1 (W7) 297,912
Total comprehensive income for the year 33,282
Eliminated on disposal of subsidiary (W6) (108,324)
Dividends (350,000 25p 20%) (17,500)
At 31 December 20X1 205,370
WORKINGS
(1) Consolidation schedule
Arborio plc Wehani Ltd Adj Consol
£ £ £ £
Revenue 762,500 400,600 1,139,100
– Inter-co trading (24,000)
(4) PURP
Wehani Ltd Opus Ltd
% £ £
SP 120 24,000 10,500
Cost (100) (20,000) (8,750)
GP 20 4,000 1,750
40% 700
56 Financial Accounting and Reporting – IFRS® Standards: Electronic Question Bank ICAEW 2024
(7) Non-controlling interests at 1 January 20X1
£
Wehani Ltd ((350,000 + 592,500 + 40,000) 20%) 196,500
Basmati Ltd ((300,000 + 38,040) 30%) 101,412
297,912
(8) Non-controlling interests at 31 December 20X1 (for proof only)
£
Wehani Ltd ((350,000 + 592,500 + 141,850 + 30,000 – 87,500)
20%) 205,370