Additional Exercise Solution
Additional Exercise Solution
t 0 1 2 3
CF (400,000) 100,000 200,000 300,000
r 12%
NPV= 62,258.56
salary savings saving balance
1 40,000 2,000 2,000
2 42,000 2,100 4,260
3 44,100 2,205 6,806
4 46,305 2,315 9,666 E4*(1+$H$4)+D5
5 48,620 2,431 12,870
6 51,051 2,553 16,452
7 53,604 2,680 20,448
8 56,284 2,814 24,898
9 59,098 2,955 29,845
10 62,053 3,103 35,335
11 65,156 3,258 41,420
12 68,414 3,421 48,154
13 71,834 3,592 55,598
14 75,426 3,771 63,817
15 79,197 3,960 72,883
16 83,157 4,158 82,871
17 87,315 4,366 93,867
18 91,681 4,584 105,960
19 96,265 4,813 119,250
20 101,078 5,054 133,844
21 106,132 5,307 149,858
22 111,439 5,572 167,419
23 117,010 5,851 186,663
24 122,861 6,143 207,739
25 129,004 6,450 230,808
26 135,454 6,773 256,045
27 142,227 7,111 283,640
28 149,338 7,467 313,798
29 156,805 7,840 346,743
30 164,645 8,232 382,714 --> answer for a)
PV 382,714
r 8%
t 20
C? 38,980 each year
C= ($38,980.30)
FV PMT
₫382,714.30 (₫38,980.30)
cashflow accumulated cashflow
year A B A B
0 -40000 -55000 -40000 -55000
1 14000 11000 -26000 -44000
2 18000 13000 -8000 -31000
3 17000 16000 9000 -15000
4 11000 255000 20000 240000
NPV
A B
Payback period 2.47 3.06 If the company rule is very strict with t
IRR 19% 60% But, the decision to strict with payback
the expected NPV of project B is poten
Assume we have a discount rate of 12% then we can calculate the NPV
rate 12% 12%
NPV $5,940 $138,631
PI -$0.15 -$2.52
cashflow
year A
0 -40000
1 14000
2 18000
3 17000
4 11000
IRR 19%
Assume with the discount rate =12%, Project B has higher NPV
IRR also higher for B
company rule is very strict with the 3 years payback cut-off, project A should be accepted and project B should be rejected.
he decision to strict with payback cut-off may prevent the company for future value added. In this case, if we assume that both A and B ha
pected NPV of project B is potentially higher, and it can also be observed from its IRR.
cashflow AC
B A B
-55000 -40000 -55000
11000 -26000 -44000
13000 -8000 -31000
16000 9000 -15000
255000 20000 240000
60%
nt rate =12%, Project B has higher NPV
2.470588235294 3.058823529412
b.
rate 11% 11%
NPV $7,001.54 $8,948.59
Under NPV rule, the project chosen is B due to higher NPV.
lly reflect the time value of money.
13 sales growth from year 4-6 10%
cogs 70%
investment 5
depreciation 1
in million dollars
0 1 2 3
Sales 2.000 4.000 6.000
COGS 1.400 2.800 4.200
EBITDA 0.600 1.200 1.800
Depreciation 1.000 1.000 1.000
EBIT -0.400 0.200 0.800
tax -0.140 0.070 0.280
Net income -0.260 0.130 0.520
+depreciation 1.000 1.000 1.000
investment -5 0 0 0
net cashflow -5.000 0.740 1.130 1.520
NPV
tax 35%
r 16%
mil salvage value 1
mil/year
4 5 6
6.600 7.260 7.986
4.620 5.082 5.590
1.980 2.178 2.396
1.000 1.000 0.000
0.980 1.178 2.396
0.343 0.412 0.839
0.637 0.766 1.557
1.000 1.000 0.000
0 0 0.650 MV-((MV-BV)*TAX) Salvage value phải có tax
1.637 1.766 2.207