0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views26 pages

Topic 2. Consumers Surplus, Producers Surplus and Market Efficiency

Uploaded by

32334 felix
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views26 pages

Topic 2. Consumers Surplus, Producers Surplus and Market Efficiency

Uploaded by

32334 felix
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Topic 2:

Consumers Surplus,
Producers Surplus and
Market Efficiency
ECON 1210B
Economics and Society
Spring 2019

1
Introduction
⚫ By now we know markets allocate resources by the
forces of supply and demand
⚫ Why such allocations are good, and in what sense?
⚫ Welfare economics is the study of how the
allocation of resources affects economic well-being
⚫ We will introduce the concepts of
⚫ Consumer Surplus

⚫ Producer Surplus

⚫ Efficiency
2
Consumer Surplus (CS)
⚫ How may buyers benefit from a market
transaction?
⚫ The key is to distinguish value and price
⚫ Willingness to Pay (WTP): the maximum
amount that a buyer will pay for a good
⚫ WTP measures how much the buyer
values the good
⚫ CS = Willingness to Pay – Actual Payment
3
Demand Curve As the
MB Curve
⚫ To identify CS graphically, we introduce
another interpretation of the demand curve
⚫ At any quantity, the price given by the
demand curve shows the willingness to pay
of the marginal buyer
⚫ A demand curve reflects buyers’ willingness
to pay
⚫ Demand curve is also called a marginal
benefit (MB) curve
4
CS and the Demand Curve
 CS is the area P The demand for shoes
between P and the $ 60
D curve, from 0 to Q
50
h
 Suppose P = $30 40
30
 CS
20
= 0.5 x 15 x $30
= $225 10
D
0 Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
How a Higher Price Reduces CS
 If P rises to $40
P
 New CS 1. Fall in CS
60
= 0.5 x 10 x $20 due to buyers
= $100 50 leaving market

 2 reasons for the 40


fall in CS… 30

2. Fall in CS due to 20
remaining buyers 10
paying higher P D
0 Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Producer Surplus (PS)
⚫ Now we want to know how sellers may
benefit from a market transaction
⚫ The key is to distinguish cost and price
⚫ Willingness to sell: minimum amount a seller
will accept to provide a good
⚫ Determined by the marginal cost (MC)

⚫ PS = Payment Received – Willingness to Sell


= Payment Received – Seller’s Cost
7
Supply Curve As the
MC Curve
⚫ To identify PS graphically, notice that…
⚫ At any quantity, the price given by the supply
curve shows the willingness to sell of the
marginal seller
⚫ A supply curve reflects sellers’ willingness to
sell
⚫ Supply curve is also called a marginal cost
(MC) curve

8
PS and the Supply Curve
 PS is the area P The supply of shoes
between P and the
60
S curve, from 0 to Q
50 S
 Suppose P = $40
40
 PS
30
= 0.5 x 25 x $25 h
= $312.5 20
10
0 Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
How a Lower Price Reduces PS
If P falls to $30, P 1. Fall in PS
New PS 60 due to sellers
= 0.5 x 15 x $15 leaving market S
50
= $112.5
40
2 reasons for the
fall in PS… 30

2. Fall in PS due to 20
remaining sellers 10
getting lower P
0 Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
What do CS, PS, and Total
Surplus Measure?
⚫ CS = (value to buyers) – (amount paid by buyers)
⚫ CS measures the benefit buyers receive
from participating in the market
⚫ PS =(amount received by sellers) – (cost to sellers)
⚫ PS measures the benefit sellers receive
from participating in the market
⚫ Total surplus = CS + PS
⚫ TS measures the total gains from transaction/
trade in a market
11
Market Efficiency
⚫ An allocation of resources is efficient if it
maximizes total surplus
⚫ Efficiency means:
⚫ Raising or lowering the quantity of a good
would not increase total surplus
⚫ The goods are being produced by the
producers with lowest cost
⚫ The goods are being consumed by the
buyers who value them most highly
12
Evaluating the Market Equilibrium

P
Market eqm: 60
P = $30 50 S
Q = 15,000
40 CS
Total surplus 30
PS
= CS + PS 20
10
Is the market eqm D
efficient? 0 Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Which Buyers Consume the Good?
Every buyer P
whose WTP is 60
≥ $30 will buy
50 S
Every buyer
40
whose WTP is
< $30 will not 30

So, the buyers who 20


value the good most 10
highly are the ones D
who consume it 0 Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Which Sellers Produce the Good?
P
Every seller whose
cost is ≤ $30 will 60
produce the good 50 S

Every seller whose 40


cost is > $30 will not 30

So, the sellers with 20


the lowest cost 10
produce the good D
0 Q
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Does Eqm Q Maximize Total Surplus?
At Q = 20,
P
cost of producing
the marginal unit 60
is $35 50 S
value to consumers 40
of the marginal unit
is only $20 30
Hence, can increase 20
total surplus 10
by reducing Q D
0 Q
This is true at any Q
greater than 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Does Eqm Q Maximize Total Surplus?
At Q = 10,
P
cost of producing
the marginal unit 60
is $25 50 S
value to consumers 40
of the marginal unit
is $40 30
Hence, can increase 20
total surplus 10
by increasing Q D
0 Q
This is true at any Q
less than 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Efficiency of the Eqm
Figure 8 The Efficiency Quantity
of the Equilibrium Quantity

Price
Supply

Value Cost
to to
buyers sellers

Cost Value
to to
sellers buyers Demand

0 Equilibrium Quantity
quantity

Value to buyers is greater Value to buyers is less


than cost to sellers. than cost to sellers.
18
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning
Evaluating the Market Eqm:
Summary
⚫ The market eqm is efficient:
⚫ The eqm Q maximizes total surplus

⚫ The goods are produced by the producers


with lowest cost,
⚫ and consumed by the buyers who value
them most highly

19
Evaluating the Market Eqm:
Summary
⚫ Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” idea
⚫ When consumers and producers pursue
their own self-interest and interact in
markets...
⚫ Market transactions send resources to their
highest valued use in society
⚫ Govt cannot improve on the market outcome
⚫ Laissez faire (French for “allow them to do”)
⚫ govt should not interfere with the market
20
Why Non-Market Allocations
Are Usually Bad
⚫ Suppose the allocation of resources were
instead determined by a central planner
⚫ e.g. Communist leaders of Soviet Union

⚫ To choose an efficient allocation, the planner


would need to know every seller’s cost
and every buyer’s WTP, for each of the
thousands of goods produced in the economy
⚫ This is practically impossible, so centrally
planned economies are never very efficient
21
Obstacles to Efficiency
⚫ Inefficiency can occur because:
⚫ Too little of an item is produced:
⚫ underproduction

⚫ Too much of an item is produced:


⚫ overproduction

22
Underproduction
 The efficient quantity is 10,000 pizzas a day
 If production is restricted
to 5,000 pizzas a day,
there is underproduction
and the quantity is
inefficient

 A deadweight loss
equals the decrease in
total surplus (the gray
triangle)

 This loss is a social loss


Overproduction
 Again, the efficient Q is 10,000 pizzas a day

 If production is
expanded to 15,000
pizzas a day, a
deadweight loss arises
from overproduction
 This loss is a social
loss
Obstacles to Efficiency
⚫ In markets, underproduction or
overproduction arise when there are
⚫ Price and quantity regulations

⚫ Taxes and subsidies

25
Obstacles to Efficiency:
Market Failures
⚫ In the real world, sometimes there are
market failures, when unregulated markets
fail to allocate resources efficiently
⚫ Externalities

⚫ Public goods and common resources

⚫ When markets fail, public policy may remedy


the problem and increase efficiency

26

You might also like