Chapter 7 Newton’s Laws of Motion

7.1 Force and Quantity of Matter................................................................................ 1  

Example 7.1 Vector Decomposition Solution ......................................................... 3  
7.1.1 Mass Calibration .............................................................................................. 4  
7.2 Newton’s First Law ................................................................................................. 5  
7.3 Momentum, Newton’s Second Law and Third Law ............................................ 6  
7.4 Newton’s Third Law: Action-Reaction Pairs ....................................................... 7  

© Peter Dourmashkin 2012

 Chapter 7 Newton’s Laws of Motion
I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these properties of
gravity from phenomena, and I do not feign hypotheses. For whatever is
not deduced from the phenomena must be called a hypothesis; and
hypotheses, whether metaphysical or physical, or based on occult
qualities, or mechanical, have no place in experimental philosophy. In this
philosophy particular propositions are inferred from the phenomena, and
afterwards rendered general by induction. 1

Isaac Newton
7.1 Force and Quantity of Matter

In our daily experience, we can cause a body to move by either pushing or pulling that
body. Ordinary language use describes this action as the effect of a person’s strength or
force. However, bodies placed on inclined planes, or when released at rest and undergo
free fall, will move without any push or pull. Galileo referred to a force acting on these
bodies, a description of which he published in 1623 in his Mechanics. In 1687, Isaac
Newton published his three laws of motion in the Philosophiae Naturalis Principia
Mathematica (“Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy”), which extended
Galileo’s observations. The First Law expresses the idea that when no force acts on a
body, it will remain at rest or maintain uniform motion; when a force is applied to a body,
it will change its state of motion.
Many scientists, especially Galileo, recognized the idea that force produces motion
before Newton but Newton extended the concept of force to any circumstance that
produces acceleration. When a body is initially at rest, the direction of our push or pull
corresponds to the direction of motion of the body. If the body is moving, the direction of
the applied force may change both the direction of motion of the body and how fast it is
moving. Newton defined the force acting on an object as proportional to the acceleration
of the object.

An impressed force is an action exerted upon a body, in order to change

its state, either of rest, or of uniform motion in a right line.2

In order to define the magnitude of the force, he introduced a constant of

proportionality, the inertial mass, which Newton called “quantity of matter”.

1
Isaac Newton (1726). Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, General
Scholium. Third edition, page 943 of I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman's 1999
translation, University of California Press.
2
Isaac Newton. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by Andrew
Motte (1729). Revised by Florian Cajori. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1934.
p. 2.

7-1
 The quantity of matter is the measure of the same, arising from its density
and bulk conjointly.

Thus air of double density, in a double space, is quadruple in quantity; in a

triple space, sextuple in quantity. The same thing is to be understood of
snow, and fine dust or powders, that are condensed by compression or
liquefaction, and of all bodies that are by any causes whatever differently
condensed. I have no regard in this place to a medium, if any such there is,
that freely pervades the interstices between the parts of bodies. It is this
quantity that I mean hereafter everywhere under the name of body or mass.
And the same is known by the weight of each body, for it is proportional to
the weight, as I have found by experiment on pendulums, very accurately
made, which shall be shown hereafter.3

Suppose we apply an action to a body (which we refer to as the standard body) that will

induce the body to accelerate with a magnitude a that can be measured by an

accelerometer (any device that measures acceleration). The magnitude of the force F
acting on the object is the product of the mass ms with the magnitude of the acceleration

a . Force is a vector quantity. The direction of the force on the standard body is defined
to be the direction of the acceleration of the body. Thus
 
F ≡ ms a (7.1.1)

In order to justify the statement that force is a vector quantity, we need to apply two
  
forces F1 and F2 simultaneously to our body and show that the resultant force FT is the
vector sum of the two forces when they are applied one at a time.

Figure 7.1 Acceleration add as vectors Figure 7.2 Force adds as vectors.
 
We apply each force separately and measure the accelerations a1 and a 2. , noting that
 
F1 = ms a1 (7.1.2)

3
Ibid. p. 1.

7-2
  
F2 = ms a 2 . (7.1.3)


When we apply the two forces simultaneously, we measure the acceleration a . The force
by definition is now
 
FT ≡ ms a . (7.1.4)

We then compare the accelerations. The results of these three measurements, and for that
matter any similar experiment, confirms that the accelerations add as vectors (Figure 7.1)
  
a = a1 + a 2 . (7.1.5)

Therefore the forces add as vectors as well (Figure 7.2),

  
FT = F1 + F2 . (7.1.6)

This last statement is not a definition but a consequence of the experimental result
described by Equation (7.1.5) and our definition of force.

Example 7.1 Vector Decomposition Solution

Two horizontal ropes are attached to a post that is stuck in the ground. The ropes pull the
 
post producing the vector forces F1 = 70 N î + 20 N ĵ and F2 = −30 N î + 40 N ĵ as
shown in Figure 7.1. Find the direction and magnitude of the horizontal component of a
third force on the post that will make the vector sum of forces on the post equal to zero.

Figure 7.3 Example 7.1

Figure 7.4 Vector sum of forces

Solution: Since the ropes are pulling the post horizontally, the third force must also have
a horizontal component that is equal to the negative of the sum of the two horizontal
forces exerted by the rope on the post Figure 7.4. Since there are additional vertical

7-3
forces acting on the post due to its contact with the ground and the gravitational force
exerted on the post by the earth, we will restrict our attention to the horizontal component

of the third force. Let F3 denote the sum of the forces due to the ropes. Then we can write

the vector F3 as


F3 = (F1x + F2x ) î + (F1y + F2 y ) ĵ = (70 N + − 30 N) î + (20 N + 40 N) ĵ
= (40 N) î + (60 N) ĵ

Therefore the horizontal component of the third force of the post must be equal to
   
Fhor = −F3 = −(F1 + F2 ) = (−40 N) î + (−60 N) ĵ .


The magnitude is Fhor = (−40 N)2 + (−60 N)2 = 72 N . The horizontal component of
the force makes an angle
⎡ 60 N ⎤
θ = tan −1 ⎢ ⎥ = 56.3°
⎣ 40 N ⎦

as shown in the figure above.

7.1.1 Mass Calibration

So far, we have only used the standard body to measure force. Instead of performing
experiments on the standard body, we can calibrate the masses of all other bodies in
terms of the standard mass by the following experimental procedure. We shall refer to the
mass measured in this way as the inertial mass and denote it by min .

We apply a force of magnitude F to the standard body and measure the

magnitude of the acceleration as . Then we apply the same force to a second body of
unknown mass min and measure the magnitude of the acceleration ain . Since the same
force is applied to both bodies,
F = min ain = ms as , (1.7)

Therefore the ratio of the inertial mass to the standard mass is equal to the inverse ratio of
the magnitudes of the accelerations,
min as
= . (1.8)
ms ain

Therefore the second body has inertial mass equal to

7-4
 as
min ≡ ms . (1.9)
ain

This method is justified by the fact that we can repeat the experiment using a different
force and still find that the ratios of the acceleration are the same. For simplicity we shall
denote the inertial mass by m .

7.2 Newton’s First Law

The First Law of Motion, commonly called the “Principle of Inertia,” was first realized
by Galileo. (Newton did not acknowledge Galileo’s contribution.) Newton was
particularly concerned with how to phrase the First Law in Latin, but after many rewrites
Newton perfected the following expression for the First Law (in English translation):

Law 1: Every body continues in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a

right line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed
upon it.

Projectiles continue in their motions, so far as they are not retarded by the
resistance of air, or impelled downwards by the force of gravity. A top,
whose parts by their cohesion are continually drawn aside from
rectilinear motions, does not cease its rotation, otherwise than as it is
retarded by air. The greater bodies of planets and comets, meeting with
less resistance in freer spaces, preserve their motions both progressive
and circular for a much longer time.4

The first law is an experimental statement about the motions of bodies. When a
body moves with constant velocity, there are either no forces present or there are forces
acting in opposite directions that cancel out. If the body changes its velocity, then there
must be an acceleration, and hence a total non-zero force must be present. We note that
velocity can change in two ways. The first way is to change the magnitude of the
velocity; the second way is to change its direction.

After a bus or train starts, the acceleration is often so small we can barely perceive
it. We are often startled because it seems as if the station is moving in the opposite
direction while we seem to be still. Newton’s First Law states that there is no physical
way to distinguish between whether we are moving or the station is, because there is
essentially no total force present to change the state of motion. Once we reach a constant
velocity, our minds dismiss the idea that the ground is moving backwards because we
think it is impossible, but there is no actual way for us to distinguish whether the train is
moving or the ground is moving.

4
Ibid. p. 13.

7-5
7.3 Momentum, Newton’s Second Law and Third Law

Newton began his analysis of the cause of motion by introducing the quantity of motion:

Definition: Quantity of Motion:

The quantity of motion is the measure of the same, arising from the
velocity and quantity of matter conjointly.

The motion of the whole is the sum of the motion of all its parts; and
therefore in a body double in quantity, with equal velocity, the motion is
double, with twice the velocity, it is quadruple.5

Our modern term for quantity of motion is momentum and it is a vector quantity
 
p = mv . (7.3.1)

where m is the inertial mass and v is the velocity of the body (velocity is a vector
quantity). Newton’s Second Law is the most important experimental statement about
motion in physics.

Law II: The change of motion is proportional to the motive force

impressed, and is made in the direction of the right line in which that force
is impressed.

If any force generates a motion, a double force will generate double the
motion, a triple force triple the motion, whether that force is impressed
altogether and at once or gradually and successively. And this motion
(being always directed the same way with the generating force), if the
body moved before, is added or subtracted from the former motion,
according as they directly conspire with or are directly contrary to each
other; or obliquely joined, when they are oblique, so as to produce a new
motion compounded from the determination of both.6

 to a body for a time interval Δt . The impressed force or

Suppose that a force is applied
impulse (a vector quantity I ) that we denote by produces a change in the momentum of
the body,
  
I = FΔt = Δp . (7.3.2)

5
Ibid. p. 1.
6
Ibid. p. 13.

7-6