Simulator
Simulator
Simulator
01 Aug 2008
Disclaimer
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States
Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their
employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or
responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus,
product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name,
trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The
views and opinions of authors expressed therein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the
United States Government or any agency thereof.
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator
Research and Training Center
DOE/NETL-2008/1324
01 Aug 2008
NETL Contact:
Stephen E. Zitney, Ph.D.
Director, Collaboratory for Process & Dynamic Systems Research
NETL Office of Research & Development
Prepared by:
Richard Turton, West Virginia University
Collaboratory for Process & Dynamic Systems Research
Section/
Change
Page No.
Section 4.2, Changed 5th bullet to reflect that the Gasifier output will also respond to
Page 53 changes in oxygen quality at the input of the Gasifier.
Section 4.2, Changed 3rd bullet to reflect that the model must be capable of cold,
Page 53 warm, and hot startups as stated in the spec.
Section 4.3,
Added Gasifier load control loop to the control scheme for the Gasifiers.
Page 54
Added Gasifier Condition control loop to the control scheme for the
Section 4.3,
Gasifiers to control gasifier temperature and steam output of the RSC
Page 54
Cooler.
Added the following malfunctions
o Lock hopper recycle flow reduced by fouling
Section 4.6, o Forming of slag lumps due to wrong gasifier conditions
Page 64 o Bad coal conversion due to wrong gasifier conditions
o By-as burners
o Blockage or overloading of slag crusher.
Gasifier Deleted steam connection from the ammonia stripper to the slag
System PFD’s lockhopper flush drum on the fourth pfd shown for the Gasifier System,
(4th PFD) GAS-FD-003
Section, 5.0 Added collection of chlorides as a function of the Syngas Scrubbing
Page 70 System through the collection of halogens.
Section 5.2, Added water pH as a parameter to be modeled and monitored to the first
Page 72 bullet of modeling expectations.
Added the following malfunctions:
Section 5.5, o Entrainment of water
Page 75 o Drifting pH of scrubber water
o Bad Scrubber function (excess Chlorides in scrubber gas outlet)
Sour Water
Deleted unnecessary stream from the Syngas scrubber KO drum.
Stripper PFD
Section 9.0, Added the following main components for the Mercury Removal System
Page 99 to reflect the inclusion of adsorbent regeneration
Rewrote Description of Mercury Removal Process to enhance the
Section 9.1,
information provided. Also added information on Regeneration of the
Page 99
Adsorbent in the last paragraph of the section.
Added the following modeling expectations to the Mercury Removal
System
Section 9.2,
o The operator will have the capability to start and stop each of the
Page 101
Gas Recycle Blowers.
o Liquid Mercury and water flow from the Mercury Drum need not be
ii
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Section/
Change
Page No.
modeled.
o A constant level will be indicated for the Mercury Removal Drum.
o The operator will have the ability to bypass the Regeneration
Separator.
o When in use, the Regeneration Separator will provide liquid/gas
separation and a constant flow of product slipstream regeneration
gas to the main syngas supply line to the Acid Gas Removal
System.
Section 9.3, Added Syngas Temperature Control, Syngas Turndown, and Hg
Page 102 Removal Control to the Digital Control loops
Added Syngas Temperature Control, Syngas Turndown, and Hg
Section 9.4,
Concentration in Product Syngas to the HMI requirements for the
Page 102
Mercury Removal Process
Section 9.4, Amended amounts of Process Instrumentation to reflect the inclusion of
Page 102 an adsorbent regeneration system
Mercury
Amended PFD to reflect the inclusion of an adsorbent regeneration
Removal
system
System PFD
Section 12, Added wording to first function to state relationship between expander
Page 126 outlet temperature and gas dew point
Section 12.1, Added information to paragraph three to better describe relationships
Page 126 between gas dew point temperature and expander outlet temperature.
Inserted information (now paragraph four) to state that Pressure control
Section 12.1, of the Syngas entering the Expander will be based on the Syngas
Page 126 pressure upstream of the Fuel Gas Heater and pressure relief to flare.
Stated that the CT will control Expander backpressure.
Section 12.2,
Deleted “humidity” from modeling expectations.
Page 127
Section 12.3, Changed “Pressure Control of the Syngas exiting”, to “Pressure Control
Page 127 of the Syngas entering” in second bullet for train 1.
Added third bullet for train 1 to control scheme stating, “Pressure Control
Section 12.3,
of the Syngas exiting the Acid Gas Removal System (PV-003) with set
Page 127
pressure about 15 psi above PV-001”
Section 12.3, Changed “Pressure Control of the Syngas exiting”, to “Pressure Control
Page 127 of the Syngas entering” in second bullet for train 2.
Added third bullet for train 2 to control scheme stating, “Pressure Control
Section 12.3,
of the Syngas exiting the Acid Gas Removal System (PV-003) with set
Page 127
pressure about 15 psi above PV-001”
Section 12.4, Changed number of pressure and temperature indications for each train
Page 128 from “1” to “2” each to reflect inclusion of alarms.
Section 12.5, Changed malfunctions to the following items:
iii
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Section/
Change
Page No.
Page 128 o Trip of Fuel Gas Expander – Syngas will be bypass the Fuel Gas
Expander and throttled to the appropriate pressure
o Slow reaction of transfer to bypass on expander trip –release of
gas to flare.
o Flare indication/alarm – open (or not closed) position of PV-003
and PV-103 can be used to signify this event
o Slow reaction of transfer to bypass on expander trip – drop of inlet
pressure to gas turbine.
o Loss of steam – Low temperature alarm on Expander exit.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions and support provided by the contractors who
reviewed this report and provided many useful remarks, corrections, and suggestions: Carlo
Wolters and Marco Kanaar from Gasification Solutions B.V., Jerry Henderson from Energy
Resources Consultancy International, LLC, and Dan Kubek from Gasification Processing
Solutions, LLC..
iv
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table of Contents
1. General IGCC Plant Description....................................................................... 11
1.1. Flowpath Description ............................................................................................. 12
1.1.1. Slurry Preparation ..................................................................................................... 13
1.1.2. Air Separation Unit .................................................................................................... 14
1.1.3. Gasifiers .................................................................................................................... 15
1.1.4. Syngas Scrubbers..................................................................................................... 16
1.1.5. Shift Reactors............................................................................................................ 16
1.1.6. Gas Cooling, MP and LP Steam Generation, and Knockout.................................... 17
1.1.7. Sour Water Stripper .................................................................................................. 17
1.1.8. Mercury Removal ...................................................................................................... 18
1.1.9. Selexol Acid Gas Removal ....................................................................................... 18
1.1.10. CO2 Compression ..................................................................................................... 20
1.1.11. Syngas Reheat and Expansion................................................................................. 21
1.1.12. Claus Plant................................................................................................................ 21
1.1.13. Hydrogenation Reactor and Gas Cooler................................................................... 22
1.1.14. Combustion Turbine-Generator Assemblies............................................................. 23
1.1.15. Heat Recovery Steam Generators and Steam Turbine-Generator .......................... 24
2. Slurry Preparation System ............................................................................... 27
2.1. Description of Slurry Preparation Process.............................................................. 28
2.2. Slurry Preparation System Modeling Expectations................................................. 29
2.3. Slurry Preparation System Controls ....................................................................... 30
2.4. Slurry Preparation System HMI Screens................................................................ 30
2.5. Slurry Preparation System Malfunctions ................................................................ 32
2.6. Slurry Preparation System Interconnections .......................................................... 33
2.7. Slurry Preparation System References .................................................................. 33
3. Air Separation Unit............................................................................................ 35
3.1. Description of Air Separation Unit Process............................................................. 36
3.2. Air Separation Unit Modeling Expectations ............................................................ 38
3.3. Air Separation Unit Controls................................................................................... 39
3.4. Air Separation Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens....................................... 40
3.5. Air Separation Unit System Malfunctions ............................................................... 43
3.6. Air Separation Unit Interconnections ...................................................................... 44
3.7. Air Separation Unit System References ................................................................. 44
4. Gasifier ............................................................................................................... 48
4.1. Description of Gasifier Process .............................................................................. 49
4.2. Gasifier Unit Modeling Expectations....................................................................... 55
4.3. Gasifier Controls .................................................................................................... 56
4.4. Gasifier Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens ................................................. 60
4.5. Gasifier Interconnections ....................................................................................... 65
4.6. Gasifier Malfunctions ............................................................................................. 66
4.7. Gasifier System References .................................................................................. 66
5. Syngas Scrubbers............................................................................................. 72
v
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
vi
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
10. Selexol Acid Gas Removal with CO2 Capture ............................................... 108
10.1. Description of Selexol Acid Gas Removal Process .............................................. 109
10.2. Selexol Acid Gas Removal System Modeling Expectations ................................. 112
10.3. Selexol Acid Gas Removal System Controls........................................................ 113
10.4. Selexol Acid Gas Removal System HMI Screens................................................. 114
10.5. Selexol Acid Gas Removal System Malfunctions ................................................. 116
10.6. Selexol Acid Gas Removal System Interconnections ........................................... 117
10.7. Selexol Acid Gas Removal System References................................................... 118
11. CO2 Compression............................................................................................ 121
11.1. Description of CO2 Compression Process............................................................ 121
11.2. CO2 Compression Modeling Expectations............................................................ 122
11.3. CO2 Compression Controls .................................................................................. 123
11.4. CO2 Compression Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens............................... 124
11.5. CO2 Compression Malfunctions ........................................................................... 125
11.6. CO2 Compression Interconnections ..................................................................... 125
11.7. CO2 Compression System References ................................................................ 126
12. Syngas Reheat and Expansion ...................................................................... 128
12.1. Description of Process ........................................................................................ 128
12.2. Modeling Expectations......................................................................................... 129
12.3. Controls ............................................................................................................... 129
12.4. Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens ............................................................ 130
12.5. System Malfunctions............................................................................................ 130
12.6. Interconnections .................................................................................................. 131
12.7. System References.............................................................................................. 131
13. Claus Plant....................................................................................................... 133
13.1. Description of Process ........................................................................................ 133
13.2. Modeling Expectations......................................................................................... 134
13.3. Controls ............................................................................................................... 136
13.4. Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screen.............................................................. 137
13.5. System Malfunctions............................................................................................ 138
13.6. Interconnections .................................................................................................. 138
13.7. System References.............................................................................................. 138
14. Hydrogenation Plant and Gas Cooler ............................................................ 140
14.1. Description of Process ........................................................................................ 140
14.2. Modeling Expectations......................................................................................... 142
14.3. Controls ............................................................................................................... 143
14.4. Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screen.............................................................. 143
14.5. System Malfunctions............................................................................................ 144
14.6. Interconnections .................................................................................................. 144
14.7. System References.............................................................................................. 144
vii
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
viii
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
ix
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
x
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Figure 1– Case 2 Process Flow Diagram, GEE IGCC with CO2 Capture
11
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The systems, and their associated subsystems listed in the associated Process
Description are:
Slurry Preparation
Air Separation Unit
Gasifiers
Syngas Scrubbers
Shift Reactors
Gas Cooling, MP and LP Steam Generation, and Knockout
Sour Water Stripper
Mercury Removal
Selexol™ Acid Gas Removal System
CO2 Compression
Syngas Reheat and Expansion
Claus Plant
Hydrogenation Reactor and Gas Cooler
Combustion Turbine-Generator Assemblies
Heat Recovery Steam Generators and Steam Turbine-Generator
12
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Fuel Conveying
There are four material storage silos which are maintained full of coal, coke, and a flux
(limestone or dolomite). Silos 1 and 2 hold coal, Silo 3 holds petroleum coke, and Silo 4
holds the flux. Each silo has a weighfeeder beneath it to measure and convey the
material from the silo to the Main Feed Conveyors for trains 1 and 2.
The Main Feed Conveyors collect the coal, coke, and flux from each of the silo material
weighfeeders and convey the material to Mill Feed Conveyors, of which there is one per
train that feed the Mill Inlet Chutes. “MODE” selection is available to permit the
following modes of operation and blending
Slurry Preparation
There are two Slurry Preparation trains which feed the two Slurry Run Tanks. The
combination of feed material from the conveying system, slag and fines water, viscosity
modifier, and grinding water from the Grinding Water Drum are fed into the rod mill
inlets. The Rod Mill grinds the fuel and water mixture into an acceptable slurry. The
trommel screen allows the acceptable slurry to go to the Mill Discharge tanks while
some of the larger particles are dumped in to the collection bins. A Variable speed Mill
Discharge Pump for each mill train controls the Discharge Tanks level and pumps the
slurry to the Slurry Run Tanks.
Diverters at the inlet of the Slurry Run Tanks permit the operator to select which Run
tank is being filled while the Slurry Preparation System is in service. Vibrating screens
are located at the inlet to the Slurry Run Tanks. These screens serve to remove
additional large particles that were not removed by the trommel screens. The rejects
from the vibrating screens are routed to another set of collection bins.
A Slurry Pump at the outlet of each Slurry Run Tank pumps the slurry to the inlet of
each of the Gasifiers. Prior to entering the Gasifier(s), the slurry is preheated in the
Slurry Preheater. This reduces the amount of fuel necessary for gasification of the coal
slurry. The Slurry Pumps can be cross connected to receive slurry from either of the
Slurry Run Tanks.
The grinding water drum also supplies water in its own process loop through the
Grinding Water Pump which supplies flushing water to the mill outlet strainers and
cooling water to both Mill Vapor Condensers. Grinding water which flows through the
Mill Vapor Condensers returns to the Grinding Water Drum in a closed loop. The
Grinding Water Control Valve uses the Mill Feed Conveyor Rate in tons per hour of
material being sent to each mill inlet chute.
13
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The air separation plant is designed to produce 95 mole percent O2 for use in the
gasifier and Claus Plants. The plant is designed with two production trains, one for
each gasifier. The air compressor is powered by an electric motor. Moderate purity
nitrogen (99% N2) is also recovered, compressed, and used as diluent in the gas
turbine combustor, adsorbent regeneration, system startup purge, and for emergency
shutdown in other units. Higher purity nitrogen (99.9 % N2) is used as an inerting agent
and purge gas in various plant sections.
The air feed to the ASU is supplied from a stand-alone main air compressor and
supplemented by pressurized air extracted from the gas turbine. Air to the stand-alone
compressor is first filtered in a suction filter upstream of the compressor. This air filter
removes particulate, which may cause compressor wheel erosion and foul intercoolers.
The filtered air is then compressed in the centrifugal compressor, with intercooling
between each stage.
Air from the stand-alone main air compressor is cooled and fed to an adsorbent-based
pre-purifier system (also known as a mole sieve). The adsorbent removes water,
carbon dioxide, and C4+ saturated hydrocarbons in the air. After passing through the
adsorption beds, the air is filtered with a dust filter to remove any adsorbent fines that
may be present.
The air from the pre-purifier is then split into three streams. (1) About 70 percent of the
air is fed directly to the cold box. (2) About 25 percent of the air is compressed in an air
booster compressor. This boosted air is then cooled in an aftercooler against cooling
water in the first stage and against chilled water in the second stage before it is fed to
the cold box. The chiller utilizes low pressure process steam at (50 psia). (3) The
remaining 5 percent of the air is fed to a turbine-driven, single-stage, centrifugal booster
compressor. This stream is cooled in a shell and tube aftercooler against cooling water
before it is fed to the cold box.
All three air feeds are cooled in the cold box to cryogenic temperatures against
returning product oxygen and nitrogen streams in plate-and-fin heat exchangers. The
large air stream is fed directly to the HP distillation column to begin the separation
process. The second largest air stream is liquefied against boiling liquid oxygen before
it is fed to the HP distillation column. The third, smallest air stream is fed to the
14
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Inside the distillation column the air is separated into oxygen and nitrogen products.
The oxygen product is withdrawn from the distillation column bottoms as a liquid and is
pressurized by a cryogenic pump. The pressurized liquid oxygen is then vaporized
against the high-pressure air feed before being warmed to ambient temperature. The
gaseous oxygen exits the cold box and is fed to the centrifugal compressor with
intercooling between each stage of compression. The compressed oxygen is then fed
to the gasification unit. Some low pressure oxygen is sent to the Claus units.
Nitrogen is produced from the cold box at two pressure levels. Low-pressure nitrogen is
split into two streams. The majority of the low-pressure nitrogen is compressed and fed
to the gas turbine as diluent nitrogen. A small portion of the nitrogen is used as the
regeneration gas for the pre-purifiers and recombined with the diluent nitrogen. A high-
pressure nitrogen stream is also produced from the cold box and is further compressed
before it is also supplied to the gas turbine.
1.1.3. Gasifiers
This plant utilizes two gasification trains to process a total of 5,448 tonnes per day of
coal at an operating pressure of 5.6 MPa (815 psia). Each of the 2 x 100 percent
Gasifiers operates at maximum capacity.
A Slurry Pump takes suction from the Slurry Run Tanks, and the slurry feed discharge is
sent to the feed injector of the Gasifier. Oxygen from the ASU is vented during
preparation for startup and is sent to the feed injector during normal operation. The air
separation plant supplies 4,635 tonnes per day of 95 mole percent oxygen to the
Gasifiers and Claus plant. The Oxygen that is sent to the Gasifier inlet first passes
through a preheater to preheat the oxygen coming from the air separation unit.
The gasification reactions take place in near adiabatic conditions. There is some heat
loss through the refractory-lined walls to the environment, but with a new refractory
lining the heat loss is only 0.2% of the slurry feed heating value.
15
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The purpose of the Syngas Scrubbers is to clean the syngas by separating the solids
and entrained liquids from the syngas. The Syngas Scrubber system also collects and
recycles the quench water used in the gasifier quench ring and dip tube. In addition, it
controls the level of chlorides and other contaminants in the scrubber water system by
bleeding some of the water off to the Vacuum Flash System.
The syngas exiting the RSC/Quench chamber is sent to the Syngas Scrubber. The
syngas also contains entrained solids (flyash and char) and water. Just before entering
the scrubber vessel the syngas passes through a venturi nozzle scrubber where
process condensate is mixed with the gas and wets the entrained solids. The mixture of
syngas, wetted solids and entrained liquid enters the scrubber vessel where the
entrained solids and liquid droplets are removed from the gas flow via centrifugal force.
The raw syngas exits the top of the Syngas Scrubber.
The Quench Water System provides the Quench chamber with quench water that is
recirculated from the Syngas Scrubber.
The Syngas Scrubber (RSC/Quench Water) Pumps pump water and solids from the
bottom of the syngas scrubber vessel a takeoff line of the Syngas Scrubber to the
quench ring in the Quench chamber RSC. The solids from the scrubber settle in the
RSC sump along with the RSC course slag, both are flushed through the lockhopper
system. The solids are processed by the slag handling system where the course and
fine slag is separated and processed. Before flowing through the quench ring the water
passes through the Quench Water Strainers for removal of any entrained solids or pipe
scale. Both pumps and strainers operate simultaneously and the pumps have separate
suction lines and discharge lines (to strainer) to ensure maximum availability of quench
water.
The conversion of CO to CO2 for this plant is achieved by sour gas shift (SGS), where
the water-gas (CO-) shift reaction occurs prior to removal of the acid gas from the
synthesis gas. The shift reactors also serve to hydrolyze COS, which eliminates the
need for a separate COS hydrolysis reactor. They also decompose metal carbonyls,
formic acid, and hydrogen cyanide.
The SGS is placed after the Gasifier and subsequent syngas cooling, but before further
gas cooling in preparation for the de-Sulfurization step of the Acid Gas Removal Unit.
This flow scheme is depicted in the following general process flow diagram.
16
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Syngas leaves the Water-Gas Shift (WGS) system and passes through a series of gas
coolers which also act to heat boiler feedwater and to produce steam at two pressures.
The syngas coming from the WGS system first enters the syngas / MP Boiler Feedwater
Heat Exchanger. The first stage of syngas cooling lowers the temperature
approximately 70° Fahrenheit as the Medium Pressure Boiler Feedwater passes
through the heat exchanger. The Boiler Feedwater is heated to Medium Pressure
Steam and enters a Medium Pressure steam header.
The syngas leaves the first stage of cooling and enters the second stage where it is
cooled by Low Pressure Boiler Feedwater passing through the heat exchanger. The LP
Boiler Feedwater heat exchanger lowers the temperature of the syngas by
approximately 115° Fahrenheit. The Low Pressure Boiler Feedwater is heated to LP
Steam and enters a Low Pressure steam header.
The third stage of syngas cooling takes place as the syngas enters the Final Syngas
Cooler to cool the syngas prior to entering the Mercury Removal System. The Final
Syngas Cooler uses process cooling water to lower the temperature of the syngas to
approximately 100° Fahrenheit on its way to the Knockout Drum and Mercury Removal
Beds.
Under normal operation, liquids should not condense out of the syngas until it reaches
the Final Syngas Cooler. However during start-up, shutdown, part-load and other
transients, condensate may form in the upstream heat exchangers.
Knockout
The syngas enters a Knockout Drum where any liquid in the syngas is collected. The
resulting Process Condensate liquid is pumped to the Syngas Scrubber system.
The level in the Knockout Drum is maintained by a split signal level controller.
The sour water stripper removes H2S, NH3, and other impurities from the syngas
scrubber and other waste streams.
The stripper system consists of a sour drum that accumulates sour water from the
syngas scrubber and condensate from syngas coolers. Sour water from the drum flows
to the sour water stripper, which consists of a packed column with a steam-heated
reboiler. As the sour water flows down the tower, sour gas is stripped from the liquid by
steam. The sour gas and steam rise to the tower cooling section.
17
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The overhead sour gas flows through a top condenser air cooler and from there the
sour gas is sent to the sulfur recovery unit. The condensate is fed back to the stripper.
The stripped water is collected in the tower bottom and is either recycled back to the
process or sent to wastewater treatment. To maintain a minimum required flow through
the stripper, a recycle will be operational when the sour water feed flow to the stripper is
too low. The bottom flow is cooled to meet design specifications for the stripper
condensate.
Syngas leaving each of the Final Syngas Coolers in the Gas Cooling System is
superheated to approximately 5ºF above its water dewpoint in a Mercury Removal
Preheater using MP boiler feedwater. The purpose of the preheating is to prevent
condensation within the activated carbon beds. After leaving the preheater, the syngas
is passes to through a set of packed activated Carbon Beds that is designed to remove
mercury from the syngas. The syngas exiting the Carbon Bed is cooled in a Mercury
Removal Aftercooler prior to entering the Acid Gas Removal System.
The Selexol Acid Gas Removal Process (AGR) with CO2 Capture removes the
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) gas from the shifted raw syngas
Stream, creating three product streams: clean syngas for the combustion turbine, H2S-
rich acid gas for use in the Claus Plant, and CO2 for sequestration. There are three
major vessels in the AGR process, the H2S Absorber, CO2 Absorber and the Stripper.
Both Absorber columns use Selexol for H2S and CO2 capture. Selexol is a physical
solvent which has an affinity to absorb both CO2 and H2S at high partial pressures and
low temperature and will release those gases when the solvent is depressurized and
heated. CO2 stripping is accomplished by flashing the gas off at various pressures.
H2S is stripped from the Selexol through reboiling and recirculation action.
Raw shifted Syngas from the gasification process is fed to the Selexol H2S Absorber.
Here, the cooled syngas is fed into the lower section of the Absorber below the
Absorber mixing trays. The syngas leaves the top of the H2S absorber. “Loaded”
solvent pumped from the bottom of the CO2 Absorber is cooled in the Loaded Solvent
Coolers and fed to the upper section of the H2S Absorber where it flows down across
18
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
the mixing trays. At this point, the solvent absorbs H2S in the syngas and becomes
“rich” solvent. This rich solvent flows out of the bottom of the Absorber through the Rich
Solvent Strainer which removes any solids that may be contained in the liquid. The rich
solvent then flows through a Lean/Rich Heat Exchanger where the rich solvent is
heated by lean solvent coming from the Stripper. After this preheating takes place, the
hot, rich solvent flows to the inlet of the H2S Concentrator where it partially flashed via
depressurization.
The stripped gases from the H2S Concentrator (predominantly CO2) are cooled, dried,
compressed and sent back to the raw syngas inlet of the H2S Absorber. The solvent
leaving the bottom of the H2S Concentrator is sent to the Stripper so that the remaining
gases in the rich solvent are liberated.
The clean or “sweet” fuel syngas flows out of the top to the H2S Absorber to the CO2
Absorber vessel.
Selexol Stripper
In the Stripper, rich solvent is heated in order to separate the H2S from the solvent.
Rich solvent from the H2S Concentrator enters the chimney portion of the Stripper at the
top, and the H2S that is easily separated vaporizes and goes off the top the unit,
together with the rest of the stripped steam and a small portion of the entrained Selexol.
This acid gas stream is cooled, so the condensed steam and the Selexol will enter the
stripper again as reflux. A small portion of the reflux will be blown off to keep the water
content of the Selexol constant. The solvent in the Selexol stripper is heated in the
Selexol Reboiler. The Reboiler uses low pressure steam (at approximately 50 psig) to
heat the solvent. The stripped steam rises in the column and aids in the separation of
the incoming rich solvent until the H2S exits at the top.
There are two major flows out of the Selexol Stripper, lean solvent that is recirculated
back to the CO2 Absorber from the Stripper bottom, and H2S-rich acid gas that flows out
of the top of the Stripper.
Lean solvent at the bottom of the Stripper is supplied to the inlet of the 2 x 100%
capacity Lean Solvent Pumps. The in-service pump discharges the lean solvent
through a strainer and pumps the lean solvent through the Lean/Rich Heat Exchangers
where the lean solvent is cooled as it preheats the rich solvent flowing to the H2S
Concentrator. The lean solvent then flows through the Lean Solvent Cooler where it is
cooler further prior to entering the chimney of the CO2 Absorber. In the CO2 Absorber,
the solvent cycle begins again by absorbing CO2 in the clean syngas coming from the
H2S Absorber.
The “sour” H2S-rich acid gas that is discharged from the top of the Stripper is routed
through an Acid Gas Cooler, where its temperature is lowered. Steam will condense
and any solvent remaining is removed from the sour gas. The Acid Gas Cooler is air
cooled by multiple speed fans. The exit temperature of the acid is controlled by
19
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
modulation of the Acid Gas Cooler Air Vanes. It is desirable to condense all the solvent
while keeping the temperature as high as possible so the H2S gas will not be absorbed
by the solvent. The condensed liquids removed from the acid gas stream are collected
in a Knock Out Drum and pumped back to the Stripper as reflux by either of the 2 x
100% capacity Reflux Pumps, while the acid gas exits from the Knock Out Drum and
leaves the Selexol Unit for processing in the Claus Plant to recover elemental Sulfur
from the H2S gas.
The syngas leaving the H2S absorber is fed into the CO2 absorber. The CO2 Absorber
receives the lean solvent in the chimney portion of the structure near the top. The lean
solvent flows down over the upper tray and mixes with the semi-lean solvent from the
LP Flash Drum being fed at the top of the lower tray. This semi-lean solvent is the
resulting solvent flow after the CO2 Absorption and removal takes place. The gas outlet
of the CO2 absorber contains H2S and CO2.
A portion of the loaded solvent flow from the bottom of the CO2 Absorber is processed
for removal of captured H2 and CO2. The remainder flows to the Loaded Solvent
Pumps and eventually is used in the H2S Absorber.
The loaded solvent splits off for CO2 and H2 removal and is sent through a series of
three flash drums that operate at descending pressures (the first being the highest
pressure). The three drums involved in the CO2 removal process in order of flow are:
the H2 Recovery Drum operating at approximately 300 psia, the Medium Pressure (MP)
Flash Drum operating at approximately 150 psia and the Low Pressure (LP) Flash Drum
operating at approximately 75 psia.
H2 is recovered in the H2 Recovery Drum by flashing the loaded solvent, and then
compressing and cooling the resulting H2 and returning it to the CO2 Absorber syngas
inlet.
CO2 is recovered in the process as the solvent flashes in the MP and LP Flash Drums.
After the CO2 comes out of solution, it is sent to the CO2 Compression Unit.
Each CO2 Compression Train consists of a, five stage, intercooled, centrifugal CO2
Compressor connected to a Glycol dehydration system. Each compressor receives
CO2 at two different pressure levels from the CO2 capture portion of the Selexol Acid
Gas Removal System and raises the CO2 pressure from atmospheric, to about 2200 psi.
As a part of this process, the CO2 undergoes a phase shift from gas to supercritical fluid.
The CO2 from the LP Flash Drum of the Selexol system enters at the CO2 Compression
system at the 1st Stage Suction Drum. The CO2 from the MP Flash Drum of the Selexol
20
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
system enters the CO2 Compression system at the discharge of the 1st Stage
Aftercooler.
The pressure of the CO2 is raised as the gas passes from stage to stage. When the
CO2 reaches the end of the fourth stage, it passes to a Glycol Tower where the CO2 is
dried by mixing with Tri-ethylene Glycol, thereby minimizing the possibility of corrosion
in the transport piping due to moisture being present.
Clean syngas from the AGR system is combined with a small amount of clean gas from
the CO2 compression process and heated to 465°F using Cold Reheat steam before
passing through an expansion turbine.
The temperature of the syngas entering the Expander will be controlled by varying the
amount of steam entering the Fuel Gas Reheater. The condensed steam from the Fuel
Gas Reheater will be routed to the condenser.
The capability to bypass the Fuel Gas Expander will be included in the event of an
Expander trip or during startup. The bypass will include a pressure reducing station that
can accommodate startup conditions as well as a full load Expander trip. Isolation
valves for both the Expander and the pressure reducing station in the bypass line shall
be included.
There is only one, oxygen-blown Claus Plant that receives acid gas from the AGR
system and sour gas from the sour water stripper. The Claus process converts H2S to
elemental sulfur.
The first reaction shown below is thermal and occurs in the reaction furnace. The
furnace temperature should be high enough to destroy any ammonia in the acid gas.
One-third of the H2S is oxidized to SO2. The newly formed SO2 reacts with the
remaining H2S to form elemental sulfur. Since these reactions are highly exothermic, a
waste heat boiler, which recovers this heat to generate high-pressure steam while
cooling the process stream, usually follows the furnace. Sulfur is condensed in a
condenser that follows the high-pressure steam recovery section and is drained through
a seal leg to the sulfur pit. Low-pressure steam is raised in the condenser from further
cooling of the process gas.
21
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The tail gas from the first condenser then goes to two catalytic conversion stages,
where the remaining sulfur is recovered via the Claus reaction:
The Claus reaction is catalytic and equilibrium limited. The sulfur in the vapor phase
exists as S2, S6, and S8 molecular species, with the S2 predominant at higher
temperatures, and S8 predominant at lower temperatures.
Each catalytic stage consists of gas preheat (in the Converter Preheater), a catalytic
reactor (Sulfur Converter), and a Sulfur Condenser. Gas preheating is required prior to
entering the catalytic reactor to avoid sulfur condensing in the catalyst bed. In the
catalytic reactor, the Claus reaction takes place over a fixed bed of activated alumina
catalyst in which sulfur is formed. The reacted process gases then flow to the sulfur
condenser and are cooled while condensed sulfur drains to the sulfur pit. After the
second catalytic stage, the tail gas proceeds to the hydrogenation reactor for further
processing.
The tail gas from the Claus plant usually contains small but varying quantities of COS,
CS2, SO2, and elemental sulfur vapors. Sulfur recovery is increased by converting
these remaining sulfur compounds in the tail gas to H2S and then compressing the tail
gas and returning it to the Selexol AGR process.
The tail gas is first preheated in the Reactor Preheater with HP steam produced from
the Claus Waste Heat Boiler. The inlet temperature to the Hydrogenation Reactor is
controlled by adjusting the HP steam rate. An analyzer on the tail gas measures the H2
content of the stream and, if required, treated fuel gas from the Acid Gas Removal unit
is added to the reactor feed. The heated tail gas is hydrogenated where sulfur
compounds are reduced at elevated temperature. The following hydrogenation and
hydrolysis reactions occur in the hydrogenation reactor:
S + H2 → H2S
The reactions are exothermic, and heat is removed from the gas in the Gas Cooler,
which produces LP steam.
22
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The gas is further cooled in a Direct Contact Condenser (or Quench Tower). The gas
enters the condenser below the bottom trays and is contacted with caustic so that any
sulfur dioxide remaining in the gas is captured. The column bottoms is recycled in a
circulating loop and spent caustic is periodically removed from the loop and routed to
the effluent bio-treatment unit. Water from the Direct Contact Condenser is also
recycled with the following controls:
The scrubbed gas then flows up the condenser for direct quenching with water. The
water is removed from the chimney tray in the middle of the condenser and cooled in an
air cooler followed by a trim cooler with cooling water. If required, sour water is removed
from the system to maintain the water balance (flow rate is varied to control the liquid
level on the chimney tray). A portion of the water from the cooling loop may also be
diverted to the lower section of the condenser to maintain the liquid level in the bottom
of the column.
The contact condenser overhead gas is sent to the Tail Gas Knockout Drum to remove
entrained liquid before entering the Tail Gas Compressor. The compressed tail gas is
recycled back to the Acid Gas Removal unit.
The simulator shall model two independent combustion turbines (CT’s). Each CT shall
be directly coupled to a 3-phase AC generator driven at 3600 RPM by an extension of
the inlet compressor shaft. Each CT shall be capable of operating on either hydrogen-
rich syngas derived from coal gasification and various gas treatment processes or by
natural gas. CT’s shall be capable of transferring between fuels while maintaining
continuous operation at any load point. Furthermore, these CT’s shall be capable of
operating on any mixture between the two fuels.
Each combustion turbine shall be associated with a Heat Recovery Steam Generator
(HRSG) designed to recover the energy in the hot combustion turbine exhaust gas. The
combustion turbines are not able to operate in simple cycle mode. Under standard
conditions (59 degrees F., 29.92 in. hg.), each combustion turbine/generator assembly
shall be capable of delivering 232 MW on syngas fuel, and 185 MW on natural gas.
23
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
HRSG’s
The simulator shall model two independent heat recovery steam generators, one for
each train. Each of these HRSG’s is a triple-pressure natural circulation water tube
steam generator that is designed to utilize exhaust energy available from its attached
CT. The HRSG design shall include high pressure, intermediate pressure, and low
pressure evaporator sections with superheater, drum, and economizer for each section.
The simulation shall model all of specified heat exchangers piping, tanks, valves, and
volumes specified. Each HRSG shall also be fitted with a selective catalytic reduction
grid with ammonia injection.
Exhaust gas from the CT is directed to the HRSG by the inlet transition duct. The
“setting” provides CT exhaust gas containment ductwork, encasement of various heat
recovery module units, and the exhaust stack. The HRSG setting includes ductwork
transitions for connection with CT outlet flange and HRSG module boxes.
In support of the coal gasification plant, the HRSG shall also be designed to supply an
adequate flow of heated feedwater to the syngas cooler equipment, and in return
receive a commensurate flow of high pressure steam which shall be used to augment
the HRSG’s production of high pressure steam. During times when the CT is operating
on natural gas, the syngas cooler feedwater supply and high pressure steam returns
shall be isolated.
The HRSG’s will have the following supporting systems, specified in the associated
Process Description in Appendix D:
Condensate System
Feedwater System
Circulating Water System
Service Water System
24
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Steam Turbine
The function of turbine models is to convert the thermodynamic energy of main and
reheat steam into mechanical energy used to drive the generator rotor. LP, IP and HP
turbines are used. The reheat cycle takes HP exhaust steam and cycles it through the
HRSG. Reheat steam is returned to the IP turbine. The combined stop and control
valves regulate main steam flow to the turbine HP turbine. The combined reheat valves
control the admission of reheated steam into the IP turbine. The purpose of the stop,
control and intercept valves is to regulate the turbine speed, load, steam pressure and
to provide emergency protection. The positioning of these valves is performed by
Electro-hydraulic Control (EHC) System, where a combination of analog and digital
electrical signals is transformed by a high-pressure hydraulic fluid system. The Turbine
Supervisory Instrumentation (TSI) System, as implemented in the turbine control DCS,
monitors the following important turbine parameters:
Turbine eccentricity measured as the amount of bow in the turbine rotor at turning
gear speed.
Vibration of rotating shafts of the turbine and generator monitored at each bearing
for the purposes of recording and protective tripping.
Rotor-shell expansion due to differential temperature response of the turbine rotor
and shells.
Turbine temperatures monitored in order to minimize metal stress caused by thermal
gradients. Temperatures are measured at the stop valve, steam chest, HP turbine
first stage inner shell, and the IP turbine reheat bowl.
Water induction into the steam path of the turbine is monitored in order to prevent
serious damage to the high-pressure shells, rotors, buckets and bearings.
The turbine system also includes the turning gear, which rotates the turbine-generator
rotor train at slow speed (3-5 rpm) after the turbine shutdown to prevent the rotor
bowing and bearings overheating. Another use of the turning gear is to assist steam
flow in rolling off the turbine at startup.
The turbine lubricating oil supply provides cleaned and purified oil at regulated pressure
and temperature for lubrication and cooling of the rotor bearings of the turbine,
generator and exciter. Primary closed-loop cooling directly supplies oil to the turbine-
generator bearings.
The turbine hydraulic power supply provides a source of high-pressure fluid to convert
the electrical signals produced in the turbine’s analog and logic control circuits into
power for operating the turbine’s control and stop valves.
25
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Generator
The electrical generator converts mechanical power from the prime mover (steam
turbine) into electrical energy for supply to the grid. The generator consists of a wire-
wound rotor that spins inside a wire-wound stator; the rotor windings are energized by a
separate excitation circuit, and creates a rotating magnetic and electrical field. This field
passes through the stationary windings of the stator to induce an electrical current and
terminal voltage. This voltage is stepped up to grid voltage by a transformer. Terminal
voltage strength and/or generator reactive power are determined by the field excitation,
transformer step-up ratios, and grid conditions.
26
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Grind the raw fuel feed (coal, coke, flux) into slurry for use.
Transport, preheat and store the slurry for use as fuel in the Gasifier.
The Slurry Preparation System is shown in flow diagram SLURRY-FD-1 at the end of
this document. The system is comprised of the following main components:
Coal Silo 1
Coal Weighfeeder 1
Coal Silo 2
Coal Weighfeeder 2
Coke Silo 3
Coke Weighfeeder 1
Coke Weighfeeder 2
Flux Silo 4
Flux Weighfeeder 1
Flux Weighfeeder 2
Main Feed Conveyor 1
Main Feed Conveyor 2
Mill Feed Conveyor 1
Mill Feed Conveyor 2
Mill Inlet Chute (2)
Viscosity Modifier Injection System
Horizontal Rod Mills (2).
Mill Motor, Clutch and Control System (2)
Mill Discharge Tanks (2)
Mill Discharge Tank Agitators (2)
Mill Discharge Pumps (2)
Diverters
Slurry Run Tanks (2)
Slurry Run Tank Agitators (2)
Slurry Pumps (2)
Slurry Preheater
Mill Vapor Condensers (2)
Grinding Water Drum
Grinding Water Pump
Slurry Mill Ejector
Vibrating Screen
27
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Fuel Conveying
There are four material storage silos which are maintained full of coal, coke, and a flux
(limestone or dolomite). Silos 1 and 2 hold coal, Silo 3 holds petroleum coke, and Silo 4
holds the flux. Each silo has a weighfeeder beneath it to measure and convey the
material from the silo to the Main Feed Conveyors for trains 1 and 2.
The Main Feed Conveyors collect the coal, coke, and flux from each of the silo material
weighfeeders and convey the material to Mill Feed Conveyors, of which there is one per
train that feed the Mill Inlet Chutes. “MODE” selection is available to permit the
following modes of operation and blending. These modes are as follows:
o Coal only
o Coal + Coke
o Coke only
o Coal + Flux
o Coke + Flux
o Coal + Coke + Flux.
Conveyor systems are normally interlocked so that a conveyor failure results in the
tripping of all upstream conveyors.
Weigh Feeders have similar interlocks and must be started in the last to first sequence
also.
Slurry Preparation
There are two Slurry Preparation trains which feed the two Slurry Run Tanks. The
combination of feed material from the conveying system, slag and fines water, viscosity
modifier, and grinding water from the Grinding Water Drum are fed into the rod mill
inlets. The Rod Mill grinds the fuel and water mixture into an acceptable slurry. The
trommel screen allows the acceptable slurry to go to the Mill Discharge tanks while
some of the larger particles are dumped in to the collection bins. A Variable speed Mill
Discharge Pump for each mill train controls the Discharge Tanks level and pumps the
slurry to the Slurry Run Tanks.
28
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Diverters at the inlet of the Slurry Run Tanks permit the operator to select which Run
tank is being filled while the Slurry Preparation System is in service. Vibrating screens
are located at the inlet to the Slurry Run Tanks. These screens serve to remove
additional large particles that were not removed by the trommel screens. The rejects
from the vibrating screens are routed to another set of collection bins.
A Slurry Pump at the outlet of each Slurry Run Tank pumps the slurry to the inlet of
each of the Gasifiers. Prior to entering the Gasifier(s), the slurry is preheated in the
Slurry Preheater. This reduces the amount of fuel necessary for gasification of the coal
slurry. The Slurry Pumps can be cross connected to receive slurry from either of the
Slurry Run Tanks.
The grinding water drum also supplies water in its own process loop through the
Grinding Water Pump which supplies flushing water to the mill outlet strainers and
cooling water to both Mill Vapor Condensers. Grinding water which flows through the
Mill Vapor Condensers returns to the Grinding Water Drum in a closed loop. The
Grinding Water Control Valve uses the Mill Feed Conveyor Rate in tons per hour of
material being sent to each mill inlet chute.
It is anticipated that the Slurry Preparation System will be a functional model that allows
the operator to complete the startup, shutdown and normal monitoring of system
equipment.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the Slurry Preparation System. Each of these issues will
impact the training effectiveness of the simulator and shall be taken into account when
developing the model. In order to address these issues and achieve the fidelity of
simulation desired for research and operator training, the simulator model of the Slurry
Preparation System, the following parameters should be addressed in the model at a
minimum:
29
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included as part of the simulator
model:
It is anticipated that there will need to be two Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens
associated with the Slurry Preparation System.
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that one HMI screen will contain the Fuel Conveying System
controls and instrumentation. The other will contain the Slurry Preparation Controls and
Instrumentation.
The two HMI Screens for the Slurry Preparation process will include the process mimic,
controls and instrumentation shown in SLURRY-FD-1and will include:
30
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
31
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (5)
o Flow Indications
o Feeder Speeds for all Feeders and Conveyors
o Fuel Conveyance for each of the feeders (feeder output in tons per hour)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves and diverters
o Slurry Density on Slurry Pump Discharge
o Mill KW (2)
32
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
system described in this Process Description:
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2008). Gasification. (2nd Edition). Oxford:
Elsevier.
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2003). Gasification. Oxford: Elsevier
US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2007a).
DOE/NETL. (2007). Cost and Performance Comparison of Fossil Energy Power
Plants Study Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity.
Available online at http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-
analyses/pubs/Bituminous%20Baseline_Final%20Report.pdf.
33
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A A
B CAUSTIC B
SUPPLY
MILL DISCHARGE
D PUMP D
TRAIN # 2
COAL
GRINDING WATER PUMP SLURRY SLURRY
PUMP 1 PUMP 2
RECIRCULATION
STARTUP LINE
MILL STARTUP
INLET TO GASIFIER 1
CHUTE WCCS
MILL VAPOR
WCCR COND. SLURRY
PREHEAT
TO GASIFIER 2
AGITATOR
MILL
E E
MILL LT
DISCHARGE DIVERTER
TANK DRAIN / FLUSH
STEAM TO SLURRY
PREHEAT
MILL DISCHARGE
FOSSIL CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
PUMP COLUMBIA, MARYLAND, USA
DOE-NETL-IGCC
F SIMULATOR F
SLURRY PREPARATION
SYATEM
FLOW DIAGRAM
05/28/2008 SLURRY-FD-1 B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
34
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Supply high pressure, high purity oxygen to the Gasifier Feed Injectors.
Supply Oxidant to the Claus Plant
Supply diluent nitrogen to the Combustion Turbines
Supply nitrogen to the AGR System for H2S Concentration
Supply purge nitrogen to the Gasifiers and Combustion Turbines
Produces liquid oxygen and nitrogen for storage
The IGCC includes two ASU trains, one for each gasifier. Each ASU train is comprised
of the following main components:
35
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Referring to figures ASU-FD-1, ASU-FD-2, and ASU-FD-3 at the end of this document:
The air separation plant is designed to produce 95 mole percent O2 for use in the
gasifier and Claus Plants. The plant is designed with two production trains, one for
each gasifier. The air compressor is powered by an electric motor. Moderate purity
nitrogen (99% N2) is also recovered, compressed, and used as diluent in the gas
turbine combustor, adsorbent regeneration, system startup purge, and for emergency
shutdown in other units. Higher purity nitrogen (99.9 % N2) is used as an inerting agent
and purge gas in various plant sections.
The air feed to the ASU is supplied from a stand-alone main air compressor and
supplemented by pressurized air extracted from the gas turbine. Air to the stand-alone
compressor is first filtered in a suction filter upstream of the compressor. This air filter
removes particulate, which may cause compressor wheel erosion and foul intercoolers.
The filtered air is then compressed in the centrifugal compressor, with intercooling
between each stage.
Air from the stand-alone main air compressor is cooled and fed to an adsorbent-based
pre-purifier system (also known as a mole sieve). The adsorbent removes water,
carbon dioxide, and C4+ saturated hydrocarbons in the air. After passing through the
adsorption beds, the air is filtered with a dust filter to remove any adsorbent fines that
may be present.
The air from the pre-purifier is then split into three streams. (1) About 70 percent of the
air is fed directly to the cold box. (2) About 25 percent of the air is compressed in an air
booster compressor. This boosted air is then cooled in an aftercooler against cooling
water in the first stage and against chilled water in the second stage before it is fed to
the cold box. The chiller utilizes low pressure process steam at (50 psia). (3) The
remaining 5 percent of the air is fed to a turbine-driven, single-stage, centrifugal booster
compressor. This stream is cooled in a shell and tube aftercooler against cooling water
before it is fed to the cold box.
All three air feeds are cooled in the cold box to cryogenic temperatures against
returning product oxygen and nitrogen streams in plate-and-fin heat exchangers. The
36
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
large air stream is fed directly to the HP distillation column to begin the separation
process. The second largest air stream is liquefied against boiling liquid oxygen before
it is fed to the HP distillation column. The third, smallest air stream is fed to the
cryogenic expander to produce refrigeration to sustain the cryogenic separation process
and sent to the LP column.
Inside the distillation column the air is separated into oxygen and nitrogen products.
The oxygen product is withdrawn from the distillation column bottoms as a liquid and is
pressurized by a cryogenic pump. The pressurized liquid oxygen is then vaporized
against the high-pressure air feed before being warmed to ambient temperature. The
gaseous oxygen exits the cold box and is fed to the centrifugal compressor with
intercooling between each stage of compression. The compressed oxygen is then fed
to the gasification unit. Some low pressure oxygen is sent to the Claus units.
Nitrogen is produced from the cold box at two pressure levels. Low-pressure nitrogen is
split into two streams. The majority of the low-pressure nitrogen is compressed and fed
to the gas turbine as diluent nitrogen. A small portion of the nitrogen is used as the
regeneration gas for the pre-purifiers and recombined with the diluent nitrogen. A high-
pressure nitrogen stream is also produced from the cold box and is further compressed
before it is also supplied to the gas turbine.
37
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that the Air Separation Unit System will be a first principle model that
allows the operator to complete the startup, shutdown and normal monitoring of system
equipment.
The ASU is a very tightly integrated unit. It is difficult to get stabilized and takes a long
time to reach steady-state with the right compositions so high fidelity modeling is
important.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the Air Separation Unit System. Each of these issues will
impact the training effectiveness of the simulator and shall be taken into account when
developing the model. In order to address these issues and achieve the fidelity of
simulation desired for research and operator training, the simulator model of the Air
Separation Unit System, the following parameters should be addressed in the model at
a minimum:
38
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included as part of the simulator
model:
Note: Valves and controls for Air Separation Unit Train 2 are the same as 1. The
difference in numbering is the leading numeral being a “1” vice a “0”. (e.g. PV-150 vice
PV-050)
39
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that there will need to be six (three per ASU train) Human-Machine
Interface (HMI) Screens associated with the Air Separation Unit System.
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that one HMI screen will contain the Main Air Supply controls
and instrumentation, the second will contain the Nitrogen and Prepurifiers controls and
instrumentation, and the third will contain the Cryogenic Unit and Argon Refining
controls and instrumentation.
The six (three per ASU train) HMI Screens for the Air Separation process will include
the process mimic, controls and instrumentation shown in ASU-FD-1, ASU-FD-2, and
ASU-FD-3, and will include:
40
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Pressure Indications (9)
o Temperature Indications (9)
o Flow Indications (4)
o CO2 analyzer (downstream of purifiers)
o Dewpoint analyzer (downstream of purifiers)
o Total hydrocarbon analyzer (downstream of purifiers)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (3)
o Pressure Indications (1)
o Temperature Indications (6)
o Flow Indications (7)
o O2 concentration analyzers (2, one for O2 stream, and one for
purge N2)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (2)
o Pressure Indications (5)
41
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
42
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Oxygen Leakage
MAC motor driver trip
N2 Diluent compressor motor driver trip
Filter Plugging (MAC, DNC)
Heat Exchanger Tube Leakage
Gas Piping / Component Leakage
CO2 break through mol-sieve
Steam Valve failure in regeneration sequence causing to low temperature during
regeneration and consequently a bad regeneration.
Valve failures in mol sieve sequence.
Failure of direct contact cooler causing a higher H2O load to the mol-sieves
Malfunction of compander, causing less cooling capacity
Reduced Compressor capacity as a result of recycle valves of compressors
opening (or not closed)
Rising level in LP column
Reboiler valve fails closed or not allowing sufficient flow
Drifted analyzer(s) causing fault interpretation of presented value
43
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
system described in this Process Description:
Allam, R.J., Castle-Smith, H., Smith, A., Sorensen, J., Stein, V. (2000). Air
Separation Units, Design and Future Development. Paper presented at ECOS
2000 Gasification of Coal, Biomass and Oil. The Netherlands. Available online at
http://www.airproducts.com/NR/rdonlyres/6753032F-A8B8-4339-A12F-
BB1A8DB46735/0/ECOS.pdf.
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2008). Gasification. (2nd Edition). Oxford:
Elsevier.
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2003). Gasification. Oxford: Elsevier
US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2007a).
DOE/NETL. (2007). Cost and Performance Comparison of Fossil Energy Power
Plants Study Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity.
Available online at http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-
analyses/pubs/Bituminous%20Baseline_Final%20Report.pdf.
44
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
TO
PREPURIFIERS
20 20
FE
PT TE
MAC INLET
PRESSURE DIRECT CONTACT TO PAGES
MAIN AIR CONTROL VENT AFTERCOOLER 2&3
PDI
18 COMPRESSOR SPARGER 18
PT
AIR FILTER
PV-050
INLET
4TH MAC
1ST 2ND 3RD
16 THRU TE PT AFTERCOOLER TE 16
6TH PT
LT
GUIDE
VANES SPARGER
INLET AIR
FLOW
HP NITROGEN FOR
14 14
WCCS WCCS PURGING
IN OUT
LEVEL
CONTROL
TE
12 LV-058
12
PT
WCCS WCCS NITROGEN TO
DILUENT
WCR WCR COMPRESSOR
10 LCV-056 10
LEVEL
CONTROL
LV-059
SPARGER
8 8
FLOW
PV-057
CONTROL
FT TE
LT
SPARGER
CHILLED 6
6
DCA N2
FROM PRIMARY
RECIRC HEAT EXCHANGER
PUMPS EVAPORATOR
WATER
HP NITROGEN FOR
DEMINERALIZED
PURGING
4 4
ASU
GASIFIER
2 DEMIN. WATER 2
1
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
45
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
2 2
0 0
PREPURIFIERS PREPURIFIER REGENERATIVE HEATER AND COOLER
AIR FLOW EXPANDER
PT TE
NO FLOW RECIRCULATION FROM FLOW
PAGE 1 CONTROL
FV-076
TE PT
VENT
TE VENT COLD NITROGEN
1 PREPURIFIER 1 175# 1
8 ALUMINA STEAM 8
SILICATE TO TE
PREPURIFIER
PURGE SYSTEM HOT NITROGEN
CONDENSATE FV-080
FT PT
1 1
6 FV-070 FV-072 6
FV-074 PREPURIFIER
PV-052
TO BLAC
LINE TEMP &
TEMP. ADJUST. AIR INLET PRESS FROM PRIMARY
PT TE PRESS HEAT
CONTROL LOWER COLUMN TURBINE
CONTROL EXCHANGER
PV-053 FT TE
BOOSTER COMPRESSOR
FV-075 SEAL 1
1 GAS
4 4
REGEN N2
FV-073 PREPURIFIER 2
FV-071
ALUMINA
TE
SILICATE PT
LCT LCT
WARMUP BOOSTER EXPANDER
FLOW
CONTROL PV-068
CO2 ANALYZER
1 1
2 PT 2
FT
FROM
H2O DEWPOINT FV-065
EVAPORATIVE
COOLER NITROGEN INSTRUMENT AIR
RECYCLE FV-067
BLOWER WCCS TOTAL PT
HYDROCARBONS
PV-054
1 1
KV-066
0 0
INLET OUTLET
VENT SURGE VENT
TE
PT OUTLET
TEMP
1ST 3RD 4TH CONTROL
2ND TO PRIMARY
STAGE STAGE STAGE
STAGE HEAT
EXCHANGER
TCV-055
6 WCCS 6
DNC
AFTERCOOLER
FROM PRIMARY
INLET HEAT
PV-069 EXCHANGER
PRESSURE
FT
CONTROL TE
PT
DILUENT N2
TO TURBINE
WCCS WCR
TO EVAPORATIVE COOLER
2 2
2
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
46
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
2 TO SUMP 2
0
HP NITROGEN FOR 0
WHEN PURGE
STORAGE
LIQUID N2 FROM LIQUID IS FULL
FLOW NITROGEN SEPARATOR
FT CONTROL
NITROGEN SUPERHTR O2
ANALYZER
START-UP LINE 1
1
6 6
FT TE
REFLUX
LV-061
TE
FEED
LP
1 LV-062 1
TE
4 TO COLUMN 4
SHELF N2
C2
FT
O2 KETTLE
FEED LT
TE PRIMARY
1 CONTROL 1
2 HEAT BUFFER 2
LP COLUMN
VESSEL
EXCHANGER LEVEL
LT CONTROL
FC
TO LIQUID N2
TO LIQUID NITROGEN FT TE STORAGE
SEPARATOR
1 1
0 0
DURING
RAMP
O2
QUALITY C1 ANALYZER
CONTROL
8 LV-063 8
N2 ANALYZER
PRIMARY LT
LCT BOOTER 6
6
NITROGEN TO RECYCLE N2 COMPRESSOR
FT
AIR RETURN TO LCT LIQUID O2 RECIRC
FT TE
O2
REFLUX
LIQUID O2 TO OXYGEN TO PUMPS
THC ANALYZER 4
4
AIR FROM LCT FC
2 QUALITY 2
DGANO2
CONTROL
3
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
47
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
4. Gasifier
There are two, 50% capacity Gasifier trains.
Each Gasifier Train is comprised of and supported by the following main components:
48
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Nitrogen Purge System: Used to purge O2 lines between shutdown valves and
injector after gasifier shutdown
Steam Purge System: Used to purge slurry lines between shutoff valves and
feed injector
Referring to figures GAS-FD-4, GAS-FD-5, GAS-FD-2, and GAS-FD-3 at the end of this
document:
This plant utilizes two gasification trains to process a total of 5,448 tonnes per day of
coal at an operating pressure of 5.6 MPa (815 psia). Each of the 2 x 100 percent
Gasifiers operates at maximum capacity.
A Slurry Pump takes suction from the Slurry Run Tanks, and the slurry feed discharge is
sent to the feed injector of the Gasifier. Oxygen from the ASU is vented during
preparation for startup and is sent to the feed injector during normal operation. The air
separation plant supplies 4,635 tonnes per day of 95 mole percent oxygen to the
Gasifiers and Claus plant. The Oxygen that is sent to the Gasifier inlet first passes
through a preheater to preheat the oxygen coming from the air separation unit.
The gasification reactions take place in near adiabatic conditions. There is some heat
loss through the refractory-lined walls to the environment, but with a new refractory
lining the heat loss is only 0.2% of the slurry feed heating value.
The Slurry Charge Pump is a variable speed positive displacement diaphragm piston
pump. This pump is usually located in the slurry prep area and it takes suction from the
slurry run tanks. Slurry is fed to the Feed Injector under pressure sufficient to overcome
gasifier pressure. 30 minutes prior to gasifier light off the pump is started and adjusted
to provide the correct light off Slurry Flow. Slurry is re-circulated back to the slurry run
tanks until light off, at that time valves in the slurry lines operate to shutoff the recirc flow
and initiate flow to the feed injector. Timing of this operation must be precise and is
monitored by the Emergency Shutdown System (ESS). Additionally, the O2 valves
switch from venting the O2 flow to the atmosphere. The exact timing of both operations
is essential to proper light off. Other monitoring is accomplished by the ESS for this
pump and will shutdown the gasifier in the event of a problem that warrants it.
49
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Feed Injector
The Feed Injector is inserted into the top of the gasifier. This device provides for the
proper mixing of the slurry mixture and oxygen as it is injected into the gasifier. The
passages and nozzle sections of the injector are such that the initial injection rate is
approximately equal to 80% of the gasifier’s full load throughput. Recycle CO2 from the
CO2 removal unit may also be injected into the gasifier through the Feed Injector
Preheat Burner
A natural gas or LP Gas pre-heat burner is provided to preheat the gasifier and RSC
prior to gasifier light off and to “cure” the refractory after replacement. The preheat
burner is attached to the gasifier in place of the Feed Injector for the preheat operation.
In both cases a formal preheat schedule must be followed. Curing refractory may take
several days of preheat burner operation. The preheat burner package consists of the
burner control system, Fuel control system and a combustion air fan that provides
combustion air to the burner. Additionally a positive draft down through the gasifier and
RSC is provided by LP steam powered Aspirators located between the RSC and
Syngas Scrubber. When the gasifier is properly preheated and “soaked” the preheat
burner is removed, and aspirators isolated. The Feed Injector is bolted into its place
and the injector feed piping is installed. Gasifier light off follows after all other
preparations are completed. Preheat other than refractory cure is usually determined
by the gasifier temperature at the time it is decided to light off. In the case of a gasifier
relight no preheat is necessary provided the gasifier temperature does not drop below
approximately 1800F. Steam for aspirators is obtained from the auxiliary boiler or from
the power block if a Gas Turbine is operating.
Fuel Injector Cooling Water is sent to the injector inlet tip at approximately 110°F. The
heated cooling water leaves the tip at approximately 120°F and returns to the Cooling
Water Drum where the Injector Cooling Water Pumps take suction. The cooling water
then flows through the Injector Cooling Water Cooler where the temperature of the
cooling water is lowered back down to 110°F.
The closed cooling water system pressure is maintained at slightly less than Gasifier
pressure so that operation can detect leaks in the cooling water system. Pressure on
the Cooling Water Drum is maintained using high-pressure nitrogen at approximately
210 psi. If a leak should occur, syngas will enter the cooling water and escape the
system in the cooling water drum. A CO analyzer on the vent of the Cooling Water
Drum is provided to detect the presence of syngas. If syngas is detected, the operator
must shut the unit down until repairs can be made.
50
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Syngas Flowpath
The syngas consists primarily of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, with lesser amounts
of water vapor and carbon dioxide, and small amounts of hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl
sulfide, methane, argon, and nitrogen, and trace amounts of NH3, HCl and Hg. The
heat in the Gasifier liquefies coal ash. Hot syngas and molten solids from the reactor
flow downward into a radiant syngas cooler (RSC) where the syngas is cooled.
Steam is produced in the Radiant Syngas Cooler. At the exit of the syngas cooler the
syngas and entrained solids are “quenched” with water in the Quench Chamber.
Syngas leaves the Quench Chamber and flows to the Syngas Scrubber. The course
solids sink to the bottom of the Quench Chamber and exit through the Slag Lockhopper.
The purpose of the Slag Lockhopper is the safe removal of the slag from the Gasifier
without disrupting the operation of the Gasifier.
During operation, the Gasifier not only produces synthesis gas (or syngas) it produces
molten slag and gasified coal constituents that condense back to entrained solids. The
ash from the coal, coke and flux are liquefied by the heat in the Gasifier and coat the
walls of the Gasifier. This molten slag flows down the side of the bricks to the gasifier
exit and falls through the Radiant Syngas Cooler to the Quench Chamber. The molten
slag solidifies on its way through the Radiant Syngas Cooler and shatters into smaller
pieces due to the thermal shock of the water quench.
A slag crusher is located at the bottom of the Quench Chamber. The slag crusher is in
continuous operation while the Gasifier is in service to break the slag into small pieces
to prevent any large pieces of slag from plugging the discharge piping of the Gasifier.
The Slag Lockhopper is a Lockhopper below the Quench Chamber and that allows the
slag from the Gasifier to be sent to the atmospheric pressure Slag Handling System
while maintaining Gasifier pressure. Solids that fall through the Quench Chamber go in
to the crusher at the bottom of the chamber and in to the Slag Lockhopper. A Slag
Lockhopper Circulation Pump aids this flow cycle. The pump moves about 120 gpm of
water through the cycle in collection mode and recirculates on itself in the dump mode
at 100 gpm. When the collection cycle is completed the Slag Lockhopper is isolated
from the Quench Chamber, the lower valves opened and put through a dump cycle,
which removes all the solids contained in the hopper and flushes the hopper with flush
water. The lockhopper lower valves are closed. It is then filled, repressurized, and the
upper valves between the RSC Sump/Quench sections are opened. The lockhopper is
then ready for another collection cycle.
51
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The RSC contains numerous HP steam generating tubes. As the syngas exits the
gasifier it flows through and around the tubes generating steam and cooling the syngas.
Steam generated in the tubes is collected in the RSC Steam Drum. The steam drum
feeds saturated steam to the HRSG’s where it is combined with HRSG steam and both
streams flow through the HRSG superheaters. HP Feedwater from the power block is
used to replace water that is converted to steam maintaining the proper level in the RSC
steam drum. Prior to light off, the water in the steam drum and RSC tubes is preheated
by medium pressure sparging steam from the auxiliary boiler or power block.
The circulation pumps provide forced water circulation in the RSC steam generating
tubes. These pumps take suction on the steam drum and force flow through the RSC
tubes and back to the steam drum. The discharge of the pumps is fed to eductors that
have their suction ports connected to the steam drum. The eductors provide additional
flow capacity.
The flow through this system changes from a relatively high pressure and high
temperature to a vacuum and contains a very large quantity of abrasive solids
accompanied by acidic liquids
The Vacuum Tank’s function is to act as a transitional vessel for separating the sour gas
from the waste water and deposing of the waste from the Gasifier. The Vacuum Tank is
maintained under approximately 5-10” of vacuum. Vacuum is provided by a steam
ejector system located downstream of the Vacuum Flash on the sour gas side of the
system. The Vacuum Tank and its associated inlet valve are designed for very rugged
service. The flow through this system changes from a relatively high pressure to a
vacuum and contains a very large quantity of abrasive solids accompanied by acidic
liquids. In the “Vacuum Tank” all of the acid gases are flashed off and exit the top of the
tank to the Vacuum Condenser. The water re-condenses and falls to the bottom of the
tank with the solids. This mixes with caustic and water that enters from the Slag
Lockhopper Depressurization line and the water and solids exit the bottom of the drum
to the Slag Handling System via gravity. (The Slag Handling System is external to this
model).
52
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
processors and I/O cabinets. There are three independent channel monitoring various
gasifier, RSC and gasifier auxiliary parameters. For most processes parameters three
redundant pressures, levels, flows or valve positions, etc are monitored continuously
while the gasifier is in operation. Where gasifier tripping is preformed, three parameters
are normally monitored and a two out of three voting decision is accomplished. Loss of
two inputs or if the devices being monitored do not agree or are out of spec. the
decision to trip is made.
The ESS provides no control action (Control of the gasifier feeds and other process
flows is done by the plant process control system) other than shutting down the Gasifier
in the event it detects an unsafe condition. In most instances the ESS and plant
process control system receive information related to gasifier parameters from the same
field devices (transmitters)
SHUTDOWNS:
53
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Lockhopper Valves
Additional Interlock to prevent all three valves from opening at the same time. (3
position transmitters per valve)
Flush Valve
Depressurization Valve
The Lockhopper is controlled by its own independent logic the ESS monitors and
prevents unsafe operation.
Nitrogen Purge Valves for O2 line and Feed Injector (multiple, operated on gasifier
shutdown/trip)
54
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that the Gasifier will be a first principle model that allows the operator to
complete the startup, shutdown and normal monitoring of system equipment.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the Gasifier. Each of these issues will impact the training
effectiveness of the simulator and shall be taken into account when developing the
model. In order to address these issues and achieve the fidelity of simulation desired
for research and operator training, the simulator model of the Gasifier, the following
parameters should be addressed in the model at a minimum:
55
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The Injector Cooling Water Cooler will provide a set amount of cooling from the
Closed Cooling Water System to the Injector Cooling Water when the system is
in operation. This value will be set at 110°F and should not be variable.
The Raw Syngas outlet temperature to the Syngas Scrubber is based upon the
amount of process condensate spray flow provided, and the heat transfer within
the Radiant Syngas Cooler and Quench Section. The Radiant Syngas Cooler
shall be modeled as 11 perfectly mixed zones of approximately equal surface
area. Each zone will have its own fouling factor, which can be skewed by
engineer adjustable parameters to reflect higher fouling in the upper sections of
the cooler.
A constant volume of Makeup Water will be provided to the Injector Cooling
Water Drum to maintain level in the Cooling Water Drum if refilling or adding
makeup water is necessary.
The Vacuum Tank shall be maintained at approximately 7” of vacuum b y an
ejector downstream of the Flash Gas Scrubber.
Makeup water to the Slag Lockhopper Flush Drum shall be modeled with limited
fidelity, as they are not vital to the process.
The Slag Handling System will not be modeled, and will receive flow from the
Slag Lockhopper and Slag Lockhopper Flush Drum.
The simulation model must be shown to match a steady state heat and material
balance using a commercially available steady state simulator. If such a heat
and material balance is not provided, then one must be provided by the generic
IGCC vendor as validation of the dynamic model at normal operating conditions.
Nitrogen Sootblowing shall be modeled for the RSC section of the Gasifier.
Sootblowing the Gasifier while in operation will cause appropriate fluctuations in
syngas flow, pressure and composition.
Ambient temperature and humidity.
Wind conditions around the Gasifier.
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included in the simulator model:
56
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
57
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Gasifier B
Note: Valves and controls for Gasifier Train B are the same as A. The difference in
numbering is the leading numeral being a “1” vice a “0”. (e.g. LV-112 vice LV-012)
58
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
59
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that there will need to be eight Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens
associated with the Gasifiers, four HMI screens per train. This is in addition to any
control screen HMI’s identified in the specification.
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that one HMI screen will contain the Gasifier Feed and Cooling
controls and instrumentation, the second will contain the Gasifier and RSC System
controls and instrumentation, the third will contain the Vacuum Flash System controls
and instrumentation, and the fourth will contain the Slag Lockhopper and Flush Drum
controls and instrumentation.
The four HMI Screens per Gasifier train will contain the process mimic, controls and
instrumentation shown in GAS-FD-4, GAS-FD-5, GAS-FD-2, and GAS-FD-3 and will
include:
60
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (2)
o Pressure Indications (8)
o Temperature Indications (5)
o Differential Pressure Indications (1)
o Density Indication (1)
o Flow Indications (6)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (3)
o Pressure Indications (4)
o Temperature Indications (6)
o Flow Indications (6)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
61
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (3)
o Pressure Indications (1)
o Temperature Indications (0)
o Flow Indications (6)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
Process Instrumentation
o Pressure Indications (1)
o Differential Pressure Indications (1)
o Temperature Indications (0)
o Flow Indications (3)
o Level indication (1)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
62
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (2)
o Pressure Indications (8)
o Temperature Indications (5)
o Differential Pressure Indications (1)
o Density Indication (1)
o Flow Indications (6)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (3)
o Pressure Indications (4)
o Temperature Indications (6)
o Flow Indications (6)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
63
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (3)
o Pressure Indications (1)
o Temperature Indications (0)
o Flow Indications (6)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
Process Instrumentation
o Pressure Indications (1)
o Differential Pressure Indications (1)
o Temperature Indications (0)
o Flow Indications (3)
o Level indication (1)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
64
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
65
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Ignition Failure
Ignition indication false positive
Gasifier feed control valve failures
Improper Coal / Air Ratio
Gasifier Emergency Shutdown
Slurry Charge Pump inlet or outlet valve
Hi/Lo RSC Drum Level problems including trips (ESS)
Loss or low RSC Steam Drum Circulation Flow Trip (loss of circ pumps)
Injector cooling coil leak and or trip
Lock hopper recycle flow reduced by fouling
Forming of slag lumps due to wrong gasifier conditions
Bad coal conversion due to wrong gasifier conditions
By-as burners
Blockage or overloading of slag crusher.
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
system described in this Process Description:
Allam, R.J., Castle-Smith, H., Smith, A., Sorensen, J., Stein, V. (2000). Air
Separation Units, Design and Future Development. Paper presented at ECOS
2000 Gasification of Coal, Biomass and Oil. The Netherlands. Available online at
http://www.airproducts.com/NR/rdonlyres/6753032F-A8B8-4339-A12F-
BB1A8DB46735/0/ECOS.pdf.
Hawley, Roger F. (2000). Delaware City Refinery Repowering Project Overview
and Project Status. Paper presented at 2000 Gasification Technologies
Conference. San Francisco, CA. Available Online at
http://www.gasification.org/Docs/2000_Papers/Gtc00170.pdf
Rao, A., Samuelson, G. (2006). Advanced Power Plant Development and
Analyses Methodologies. University of California, Irvine. Available online at
http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/DOE/DOE_reports/40845/40845.pdf
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2008). Gasification. (2nd Edition). Oxford:
Elsevier.
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2003). Gasification. Oxford: Elsevier
US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2007a).
DOE/NETL. (2007). Cost and Performance Comparison of Fossil Energy Power
Plants Study Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity.
66
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
67
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
O2
O2 FROM ASU
A A
FV-012 ESV004 ESV006
TT PT FT FC
ESV-007 PRIMARY SECONDARY
ESV-005
ATMOS ESV-008 FV-003 HIC FV-010
PRE-
HEATER FV-013
ESV-009 ESV-010
REHEATED
SLURRY SLURRY
FROM RUN ESV-001 ESV-002 ESV-003
TANKS CHARGE ESV-015
AI PT FT CO TO N2 AND HP
PUMP
ANALYZER FLARE PT FT PI STEAM PURGE
B B
PURGE
LP ESV-016
STEAM HP STEAM
FROM CO2
FV-011
ESV-011 ESV-012
RECOVERY
TO RUN RECIRC
TANKS
PT FT PC PV-014
HPN2 PURGE
FV-008
ESV-014 PREHEAT
BURNER
ESV-013 CONTROL
C PURGE N2 C
TO OTHER HP N2 PDT PT
TRAIN PV-015 TE
HP N2 INJECTOR
PURGE LT CW
TE
HP N2 DRUM DRUM
TE
FT
WCCS
SYNGAS TO
PT RSC STEAM
MAKEUP WCCS
D DRUM AND D
WATER FV-001 RADIANT SCRUBBERS
SYNGAS
COOLER TE PT
GAS
INJECTOR PRESSURE
CW PUMPS FROM RSC
SPRAY
FLOW
CONTROL FT
PROCESS
LV-012 CONDENSATE FOR
ATTEMPERATION
E E
LEGEND
HP Steam
Process Water
LT Coal / Coke Slurry
Gas/vapor
Syngas
Process Condensate
Fossil Consulting Services,
Inc.
Columbia, Maryland
DOE-IGCC
SIMULATOR
F F
GASIFIER SYSTEM
SLAG / COURSE / FV-015
FINES TO GASIFIER FEED AND COOLING
LOCKHOPPER DATE DRAWING NO. REV.
06/17/2008 GAS-FD-004 A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
68
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A A
TO STEAM BYPASS VALVE
PC
TE PT
TO HRSG
HP DRUM
FV-016
B FROM HP B
SPARGING
STEAM
NITROGEN FT
TE
SOOTBLOWING
TE FC FT
TE
STEAM HP FEEDWATER
C FV-017 FROM HRSG C
RSC
RSC STEAM
STEAM DRUM LT
SYNGAS COOLER DRUM
CIRC PUMPS
RSC FEED
RADIANT FT
SYNGAS FT
LT COOLER
PT FV-019 TO
BLOWDOWN
TANK
TE PT FT
D D
SPRAY FLOW TO FEED INJECTOR
FT COOLING WATER
CONTROL SYNGAS TO
PRESSURE CONTROL
SCRUBBERS
PROCESS
RECYCLE COND
CONDENSATE
FROM FLASH FV-013
GAS SCRUBBER
QUENCH WATER
REMOVEABLE
FLANGE
LT
E E
FV-011
GASIFIER LEGEND
LEVEL
LH LH CONTROL HP Steam
CIRC RECIRC Process Water
BOILER
Syngas
FEEDWATER
Process Condensate
Recycle Condensate
DIRTY WATER Nitrogen Sootblowing
FV-015
TO SCRUBBER Fossil Consulting Services,
LV-012 Inc.
Columbia, Maryland
SLAG / COURSE / FROM ESS
FINES TO DOE-IGCC
LOCKHOPPER SIMULATOR
F F
RSC
BLOWDOWN GASIFIER SYSTEM
06/17/2008 GAS-FD-005 A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
69
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A A
PRV-110
DEA WATER INLET
B B
VACUUM
CONDENSER SOUR GAS TO EJECTOR
FT
DRAIN
DEPRESSURIZE FROM PT
SLAG LOCKHOPPER FT
FT
FT USS
C C
VACUUM
DIRTY WATER TANK COND. TO GRINDING DRUM
FV-019
FROM SCRUBBER
LT
LT
WBC
FLARE
COND
LV-017
FLASH GAS
SCRUBBER
EJECTOR LEVEL
COND CONTROL FT
CAUSTIC TO
E CCWS E
GRINDING WATER
COND TO LEGEND
VAC. TANK
LT GASIFIER
CAUSTIC BOTTOMS TO LV-018 Process Water
TANK SLAG SUMP Recycle Condensate
RECYCLE Flash/sour Gas
COND. PUMP Gas/vapor
Caustic
GASIFIER SYSTEM
4/08/2008 GAS-FD-002 B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A CONDENSATE A
TO VACUUM
FLASH DRUM
B FV-024 B
FT
FV-020 FV-021
C C
OVERFLOW WCR
FT
LP
FEEDWATER
FV-022 FV-023 PI FV-027 WCS
FLUSH
SLAG VALVE
D D
LOCKHOPPER
LT
SLAG LOCKHOPPER FT SC
CIRC TO RSC
LOCKHOPPER
PUMP
E E
LEGEND
GASIFIER SYSTEM
6/02/2008 GAS-FD-003 C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
71
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
5. Syngas Scrubbers
There are two Syngas Scrubbers, one for each Gasifier train.
The purpose of the Syngas Scrubbers is to clean the syngas by separating the solids
and entrained liquids from the syngas. The Syngas Scrubber system also collects and
recycles the quench water used in the gasifier quench ring and dip tube. In addition, it
controls the level of chlorides and other contaminants in the scrubber water system by
bleeding some of the water off to the Vacuum Flash System. The “collection” of
halogens, ammonia, H2S, CO2 etc in the scrubbers is highly influenced by the pH of the
scrubber water.
Syngas Scrubbers
The syngas exiting the RSC/Quench chamber is sent to the Syngas Scrubber. The
syngas also contains entrained solids (flyash and char) and water. Just before entering
the scrubber vessel the syngas passes through a venturi nozzle scrubber where
process condensate is mixed with the gas and wets the entrained solids. The mixture of
syngas, wetted solids and entrained liquid enters the scrubber vessel where the
entrained solids and liquid droplets are removed from the gas flow via centrifugal force.
The raw syngas exits the top of the Syngas Scrubber.
72
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The Quench Water System provides the Quench chamber with quench water that is
recirculated from the Syngas Scrubber.
The Syngas Scrubber (RSC/Quench Water) Pumps pump water and solids from the
bottom of the syngas scrubber vessel a takeoff line of the Syngas Scrubber to the
quench ring in the Quench chamber RSC. The solids from the scrubber settle in the
RSC sump along with the RSC course slag, both are flushed through the lockhopper
system. The solids are processed by the slag handling system where the course and
fine slag is separated and processed. Before flowing through the quench ring the water
passes through the Quench Water Strainers for removal of any entrained solids or pipe
scale. Both pumps and strainers operate simultaneously and the pumps have separate
suction lines and discharge lines (to strainer) to ensure maximum availability of quench
water.
Start-Up Ejector
The Start-up Ejector uses 175 psi steam to generate a sub-atmospheric pressure within
the gasifier during gasifier preheat burner operation and also to pull air through the
system during maintenance activities. The effluent from the ejector is vented to
atmosphere.
73
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that the Syngas Scrubbers will be a functional model that allows the
operator to complete the startup, shutdown and normal monitoring of system equipment.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the Syngas Scrubbers. Each of these issues will impact
the training effectiveness of the simulator and shall be taken into account when
developing the model. In order to address these issues and achieve the fidelity of
simulation desired for research and operator training, the simulator model of the Syngas
Scrubbers, the following parameters should be addressed in the model at a minimum:
74
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included as part of the simulator
model:
Syngas Scrubber A
Syngas Scrubber B
Note: Valves and controls for Syngas Scrubber Train B are the same as A. The
difference in numbering is the leading numeral being a “1” vice a “0”. (e.g. PV-128 vice
PV-028)
75
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that there will need to be two Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens
associated with the Syngas Scrubbers, one per Syngas Scrubber train.
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that each HMI screen will contain the Syngas Scrubber controls
and instrumentation,
The two HMI Screens for the Syngas Scrubber process will include the process mimic,
controls and instrumentation shown in SYN-FD-001 and will include:
76
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
77
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
system described in this Process Description:
78
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RAW SYNGAS
PRESSURE CONTROL
A
COND. TO < FC A
GASIFIER SYNGAS FT
SPRAY
RAW SYNGAS TO
TO ATMOS FT < PC GAS COOLING
LV-029A LV-029B
SYNGAS
B PC B
PV-028 SCRUBBER LV-031
TE TE
SYNGAS TO SCRUBBER
NOZZLE LCH
FC SPRAY
UTILITY / HP GREY WATER PROCESS CONDENSATE
CONTROL
LCL LC
C C
FV-0301
TE
DIRTY WATER FROM GASIFIER
TO FLASH GAS
SCRUBBER INLET
D FT D
SCRUBBER DIRTY WATER TO VAC TANK
PUMPS
PT TE
COOLED B.F.W.
FV-030
QUENCH WATER
TO GASIFIER
E E
LEGEND
VENT VENT
Utility / Grey / Dirty Water
Process Water
Syngas
Steam / AE Vapor
QUENCH Quench Water
Process Condensate
WATER
Fossil Consulting Services,
STRAINERS Inc.
Columbia, Maryland
UTILITY
DOE-IGCC
WATER SIMULATOR
F F
STARTUP
SYNGAS SCRUBBER A
SYNGAS SCRUBBERS
79
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
6. Shift Reactors
The purpose of the portion of the process is to:
The IGCC plant has two trains of Shift Reactors, one for each gasifier. Each train of the
portion of the process is comprised of the following main components:
The conversion of CO to CO2 for this plant is achieved by sour gas shift (SGS), where
the water-gas (CO-) shift reaction occurs prior to removal of the acid gas from the
synthesis gas. The shift reactors also serve to hydrolyze COS, which eliminates the
need for a separate COS hydrolysis reactor. They also decompose metal carbonyls,
formic acid, and hydrogen cyanide.
The SGS is placed after the Gasifier and subsequent syngas cooling, but before further
gas cooling in preparation for the de-Sulfurization step of the Acid Gas Removal Unit.
This flow scheme is depicted in the following general process flow diagram.
80
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Figure 2 General PFD for IGCC with Sour CO-Shift and CO2 Capture
The CO-Shift reaction is well understood and extensively used commercially in large
ammonia (fertilizer) and hydrogen plants, operating on the basis of both steam
reforming of natural gas and gasification of heavy fossil fuels. The principal catalyst and
technology suppliers for CO-Shift are Johnson-Matthey, Haldor Topsoe, and Sud-
Chemie.
Each train includes two fixed-bed water-gas shift reactors arranged in series to achieve
sufficient conversion to meet the 90 percent CO2 capture target.
The first step in the process is to convert most of the CO in the syngas to CO2 and
hydrogen by reacting the CO with water vapor over a bed of catalyst. The H2O:CO
molar ratio in the shift reaction, shown below, is adjusted to optimally 2:1 by the addition
of steam to the syngas stream (exiting the scrubber and prior to the first SGS reactor),
thus promoting a high conversion of CO. In addition, this molar ratio ensures the
avoidance of CH4 formation and Carbon deposition.
CO + H2O ↔ CO2 + H2
81
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The shift reactors require a minimum inlet temperature of >~270°C (520°F) in order to
have acceptable reaction kinetics. Care should also be taken to avoid excessively high
gas temperatures (<480°C (<896°F)) in each reactor to protect the catalyst. Cooling is
provided between the series of reactors to control the exothermic temperature rise and
limit the catalyst temperature. The feed gas to the CO-Shift will already have an
established H2O:CO ratio based upon the upstream Gasification and subsequent
syngas cooling technology, The Water Vaporization Heat Exchanger, located
downstream of the first shift reactor, is used to vaporize water, which is then used to
adjust the syngas H2O:CO molar ratio prior to entering the first shift reactor. If needed,
extraction steam from the HP steam turbine can be used to supplement the steam
requirement for the shift reaction. The MP Steam Generation Heat Exchanger, located
82
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
downstream of the second shift reactor, is used to generate IP steam, which is mixed
with Cold Reheat steam and then passes through the reheater section of the HRSG.
The warm syngas exiting the second shift reactor is cooled to approximately 232°C
(450°F).
Note that in figure above, a higher H2O:CO ratio reduces the outlet temperature of the
first bed, which can be critical in situations of high CO content and low steam content in
the syngas. It also lowers the outlet CO content from each stage, which might be
important to attain a fixed target of residual CO in the syngas after 2 catalytic stages of
shift. This could particularly have merit as the CO-Shift catalyst ages with time and
experiences decreased activity. However, arbitrarily increasing the H2O: CO ratio needs
to be counterbalanced with the understanding that this ultimately is taking elevated
pressure steam from the Steam Turbine and thus limiting the power output of the IGCC
plant. Thus the H2O:CO ratio is an economical balance between higher CO conversion
and lower power output.
Since the CO-Shift Reaction has 1 mole of each reactant forming 1 mole of each
product, increasing or decreasing pressure has virtually no impact upon the equilibrium.
It is anticipated that the System will be a functional model that allows the operator to
complete the startup, shutdown and normal monitoring of system equipment.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the System. Each of these issues will impact the training
effectiveness of the simulator and shall be taken into account when developing the
model. In order to address these issues and achieve the fidelity of simulation desired
for research and operator training of the simulator model of the System, the following
parameters should be addressed in the model at a minimum:
83
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
6.3. Controls
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included in the simulator model:
Note: Valves and controls for Shift Reactors Unit Train 2 are the same as 1. The
difference in numbering is the leading numeral being a “1” vice a “0”. (e.g. TCV-101 vice
TCV-001)
84
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that there will need to be two Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens
associated with the System.
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that each HMI screen will contain the System controls and
instrumentation,
The two HMI Screens for the System will include the process mimic, controls and
instrumentation shown in SGS-FD-001 and will include:
System A HMI:
85
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (2)
o Pressure Indications (0)
o Temperature Indications (6)
o Flow Indications (2)
o H2O – CO Analyzer
o High and Low Temperature Alarms
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
System B HMI:
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (2)
o Pressure Indications (0)
o Temperature Indications (6)
o Flow Indications (2)
o H2O – CO Analyzer
o High and Low Temperature Alarms
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
Catalyst Exhaustion
Low Shift Reactor Inlet Temperature
Loss of, or Improper Feedwater Flow to the Shift Gas Reactors
Gas Piping / Component Leakage
Component Failures., e.g. improper output analyzers, malfunctioning of pumps
Process Control Failures (TBD), valve position indicators, control valve suddenly
on manual
86
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
6.6. Interconnections
During plant startup, the following issues are important and need to be controlled
properly:
Increase in pressure in the Reactors has to be limited to < 3.5 bar (50 psi) per
minute to prevent crushing of the catalyst or undue stress on the catalyst support
system via the downward flow of the gas
The H2O:CO ratio should always exceed 2:1 at all times to avoid Carbon
deposition on the catalyst beds
Reactor Bed operating pressure should be restricted to 30 bar (450 psi) pressure
to avoid capillary condensation of the water vapor in the catalyst pores
The syngas flow should be restricted to a fraction of design flows until the CO-
Shift operation has stabilized and achieved steady state
Full syngas flows should be attained in a stepwise and incremental fashion
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
systems described in this Process Description:
87
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A A
TO
STEAM
FV-002 TURBINE
TO TRAIN 2
B B
TO HRSG
FROM
TO GAS COOLING,
SYNGAS
BFW HEATING &
SCRUBBER
KNOCKOUT
WATER FV-001 MP STEAM FV-003
SHIFT GAS VAPORIZATION SHIFT GAS GENERATION
REACTOR HEAT REACTOR HEAT
EXCHANGER EXCHANGER
D FC FC D
E E
LEGEND
Shift Steam
I/P BFW
Syngas
I/P Steam
DOE-IGCC
SIMULATOR
F F
06/23/2008 SGS-FD-001 B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
88
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The purpose of the Gas Cooling, MP and LP Steam Generation and Knockout portion of
the process is to:
Each train of the Gas Cooling, MP and LP Steam Generation and Knockout portion of
the process is comprised of the following main components:
Syngas leaves the Water-Gas Shift (WGS) system and passes through a series of gas
coolers which also act to heat boiler feedwater and to produce steam at two pressures.
The syngas coming from the WGS system first enters the syngas / MP Boiler Feedwater
Heat Exchanger. The first stage of syngas cooling lowers the temperature
approximately 70° Fahrenheit as the Medium Pressure Boiler Feedwater passes
through the heat exchanger. The Boiler Feedwater is heated to Medium Pressure
Steam and enters a Medium Pressure steam header.
The syngas leaves the first stage of cooling and enters the second stage where it is
cooled by Low Pressure Boiler Feedwater passing through the heat exchanger. The LP
89
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Under normal operation, liquids should not condense out of the syngas until it reaches
the Final Syngas Cooler. However during start-up, shutdown, part-load and other
transients, condensate may form in the upstream heat exchangers.
Knockout
The syngas enters a Knockout Drum where any liquid in the syngas is collected. The
resulting Process Condensate liquid is pumped to the Syngas Scrubber system.
The level in the Knockout Drum is maintained by a split signal level controller.
It is anticipated that the Gas Cooling, MP and LP Steam Generation and Knockout
System will be a first principle model that allows the operator to complete the startup,
shutdown and normal monitoring of system equipment.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the Gas Cooling, MP and LP Steam Generation and
Knockout System. Each of these issues will impact the training effectiveness of the
simulator and shall be taken into account when developing the model. In order to
address these issues and achieve the fidelity of simulation desired for research and
operator training, the simulator model of the Gas Cooling, MP and LP Steam
Generation and Knockout System, the following parameters should be addressed in the
model at a minimum:
90
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included in the simulator model:
Note: Valves and controls for Gas Cooling, MP and LP Steam Generation, and
Knockout Train B are the same as A. The difference in numbering is the leading
numeral being a “1” vice a “0”. (e.g. LV-137 vice LV-037)
91
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that there will need to be two Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens
associated with the Gas Cooling, MP and LP Steam Generation and Knockout Systems,
one per train.
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that each HMI screen will contain the Gas Cooling, MP and LP
Steam Generation and Knockout controls and instrumentation,
The two HMI Screens for the Gas Cooling, MP and LP Steam Generation and
Knockout Systems will include the process mimic, controls and instrumentation shown
in GCF-FD-001 and will include:
92
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Raw Syngas from the Water-Gas Shift Reactors to the MP and LP Steam
Generators (Gas Cooling).
Raw Syngas to Mercury Removal.
Boiler Feedwater supply to the MP and LP Steam Generators.
Process Condensate to the Final Syngas Cooler Spray.
Process Condensate as Makeup Water to the Low Temperature Syngas Cooling
Knock Out Drum.
Process Condensate to the Syngas Scrubber.
Condensate from the Flash Gas Scrubber to the Low Temperature Syngas
Cooling Knock Out Drum.
Sour Water to the Sour Water Drum
50 psi Steam to the Low Pressure Steam Header
175 psi Steam to the Medium Pressure Steam Header
93
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
system described in this Process Description:
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2008). Gasification. (2nd Edition). Oxford:
Elsevier.
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2003). Gasification. Oxford: Elsevier
US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2007a).
DOE/NETL. (2007). Cost and Performance Comparison of Fossil Energy Power
Plants Study Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity.
Available online at http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-
analyses/pubs/Bituminous%20Baseline_Final%20Report.pdf.
94
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A A
FT CONDENSATE
FT FROM FLASH
GAS SCRUBBER
PT PT SPRAY FLOW
CONTROL
FT
MP STEAM LP STEAM
GEN GEN PROCESS
B TE CONDENSATE B
FV-037 GA
SYNGAS FROM
WATER-GAS RAW SYNGAS
SHIFT TO MERCURY
REACTORS TE TT REMOVAL
CONDENSATE
FC LV-038 MAKE-UP WATER
FC FT
CW IN FINAL
FV-036
FV-033
SYNGAS
FT CW OUT
COOLER
C FT TE C
BOILER FEEDWATER TE
E
PROCESS CONDENSATE E
PUMPS LEGEND
Sour Water
Boiler Feedwater / Makeup Water
TO SYNGAS Syngas
LV-039 MP Steam
SCRUBBER Condensate
LP Steam
DOE-IGCC
SIMULATOR
F F
SOUR WATER
GAS COOLING, BOILER FEEDWATER HEATING, AND
DRIPS TO THE KNOCKOUT
GAS COOLING, BOILER FEEDWATER HEATING, AND
SOUR WATER KNOCKOUT
DRUM DATE DRAWING NO. REV.
06/23/2008 GCF-FD-001 C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
95
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Remove and reclaim the sour gas from the various process streams for
processing in the Claus Plant
Return process condensate that has been stripped of sour gases to either the
syngas scrubber, coal slurry, and quench water or wastewater treatment
96
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
There are several configurations possible for this system, depending on the use of the
stripped water/slurry. In this model, stripped water is used in systems were the
condensate doesn’t have to be solid free so one stripper should be adequate. Also for
training purposes modeling just one stripper is alright.
It is anticipated that the System will be a functional model that allows the operator to
complete the startup, shutdown and normal monitoring of system equipment.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the System. Some of the operating parameters that
affect sour water stripper operation are steam rate and tower pressure. Increasing the
steam rate increases the stripping of H2S and NH3. Likewise, lowering the tower
pressure will increase the stripping effectiveness at a constant steam rate, or it will allow
for the decrease in steam rate while achieving the desired stripping effectiveness.
Each of these issues will impact the training effectiveness of the simulator and shall be
taken into account when developing the model. In order to address these issues and
achieve the fidelity of simulation desired for research and operator training of the
simulator model of the System, the following parameters should be addressed in the
model at a minimum:
97
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
8.3. Controls
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included in the simulator model:
98
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
8.6. Interconnections
Sour Water from Tail Gas Treatment (from Direct Contact Condenser and Tail
Gas Compressor Intercoolers)
Sour Water from Syngas Scrubber Knockout Drum
Sour Water Drips from LP/MP Steam Gen
Steam to Reboiler
Condensate from Reboiler
Condensate to Sump
Condensate to Process or Wastewater Treatment
Sour Gas to Claus Plant
Sour Gas to Flare Knockout Drum
Sour Water Knockout Drum Vapors to Flare Knockout Drum
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
systems described in this Process Description:
99
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A PV-002 A
TO FLARE
PC
TOP KO DRUM
CONDENSER TC
VESSEL PV-001
SOUR GAS
FROM TGTU TO CLAUS
LC
SOUR WATER
B
DRIPS FROM B
LP/MP STEAM GEN TOP
AIR CONDENSER
COOLER PUMP
SOUR WATER
KNOCKOUT LC
FC
DRUM
C C
SOUR WATER
KNOCKOUT DRUM PUMP
SOUR
WATER
STRIPPER
FC
MIN. FLOW CONTROL
STEAM FLOW
CONTROL
D
FV-001 D
CW LC
FC
REBOILER
DOE-IGCC
LCV-004 SIMULATOR
F F
08/01/2008 SWS-FD-001 C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
100
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
9. Mercury Removal
There are two Mercury Removal trains, one for each gasification train.
Each Mercury Removal train of the process is comprised of the following main
components:
Syngas leaving each of the Final Syngas Coolers in the upstream Gas Cooling System
is cooled to 85-104°F (30 – 40°C), and water is separated from the syngas in a
separator. Therefore the resulting syngas is water saturated. The syngas is then
superheated to a minimum of 5ºF above its water dewpoint in a Mercury Removal
Preheater using MP boiler feedwater. The purpose of the preheating is to prevent
steam condensation on the activated carbon adsorbent, which would lead to serious
mal-performance of the carbon beds. Excessive preheat temperatures will lead to
diminished capacity of the Adsorbent to remove the Hg.
After leaving the preheater, the syngas passes downward through two parallel
Adsorbers which are packed with sulfur-impregnated Activated Carbon Beds that are
designed to remove mercury from the syngas. The Elemental Hg reacts irreversibly and
non-regenerably with the Sulfur to form HgS, and is bound in the Adsorbent pores.
101
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The syngas exiting the Carbon Bed is optionally cooled in a Mercury Removal
Aftercooler prior to entering the Acid Gas Removal System. This Aftercooler can be
considered redundant, however, since the syngas will be further significantly cooled in
the Feed / Product Heat Exchanger that resides in the downstream Acid Gas Removal
Unit, and all syngas cooling can be handled there.
The spent activated carbon, now containing bound Hg, must be handled and disposed
of by environmentally acceptable methods and procedures. The spent Adsorbent is
removed from the vessels during scheduled maintenance outages, and would be
characterized for proper disposal.
102
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that the Mercury Removal System will be a functional model that allows
the operator to complete the startup, shutdown and normal monitoring of system
equipment.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the Mercury Removal System. Each of these issues will
impact the training effectiveness of the simulator and shall be taken into account when
developing the model. In order to address these issues and achieve the fidelity of
simulation desired for research and operator training, the simulator model of the
Mercury Removal System, the following parameters should be addressed in the model
at a minimum:
103
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included as part of the simulator
model:
It is anticipated that there will need to be one Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screen
associated with the Mercury Removal System. Both trains will be controlled from the
same HMI.
The HMI Screen shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that the HMI screen will contain the Mercury Removal System
controls and instrumentation.
The HMI Screen for the Mercury Removal System will include the process mimic,
controls and instrumentation shown in MER-FD-001 and will include:
104
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (1)
o Pressure Indications (2)
o Differential Pressure Indications (6)
o Temperature Indications (13)
o Flow Indications (2)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
Syngas from the upstream Gas Cooling, Boiler Feedwater Heating, and
Knockout Systems.
Syngas to downstream Acid Gas Removal System.
Closed Cycle Cooling Water to the Mercury Removal Aftercoolers.
Hot MP BFW to Syngas Preheaters
Mercury Removal Aftercooler to Acid Gas Removal
Liquid Mercury to Containment x 2
Liquid Mercury from Containment x 2
Feed Gas from Gasifier Train 2 Gas Cooling Knockout Drum
Feed Gas from Gasifier Train 1 Gas Cooling Knockout Drum
Cooling Water In to Mercury Removal Aftercooler
Cooling Water Out from Mercury Removal Aftercooler
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
system described in this Process Description:
Corvini, G., Stiltner, J., Clark, K. UOP Paper, Mercury Removal from Natural Gas
and Liquid Streams. Available online at
http://www.uop.com/objects/87MercuryRemoval.pdf
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2008). Gasification. (2nd Edition). Oxford:
Elsevier.
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2003). Gasification. Oxford: Elsevier
Western Research Institute, US Department of Energy, National Energy
Technology Laboratory. (2006). Removal of Mercury from Coal-Derived
Synthesis Gas. Available online at
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/882283-IrdtNX/882283.PDF
105
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
106
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
BL-3A
GAS RECYCLE
BLOWERS
A
A BL-4A A
TE PT FT TE
FEED GAS FROM
PRE
GASIFIER TRAIN 1 GAS
HEATER
COOLING K.O. DRUM
CW IN
MERCURY
BYPASS REMOVAL COOLER
A CW OUT
B B
TE TE TE TE
C
LIQUID MERCURY TO C
MERCURY CONTAINMENT
TE
MERCURY FREE
SYNGAS TO ACID GAS REMOVAL
PRODUCT SLIPSTREAM REGENERATION GAS
D LIQUID MERCURY TO D
MERCURY CONTAINMENT
TE TE TE
MERCURY WATER TO
LT
CARBON CARBON REGEN DRUM DRAINS
BED BED
D/P D/P D/P
2
1B 2B B
TE
E E
CW IN LEGEND
MERCURY
REMOVAL COOLER
Syngas
B Regeneration Slipstream
CW OUT
TE PT FT Regeneration Flow
FEED GAS FROM
PRE Gas Recycle
GASIFIER TRAIN 2 GAS Cooling Water / Water
HEATER
COOLING K.O. DRUM
TE
Fossil Consulting Services, Inc.
BL-5B Columbia, Maryland
DOE-IGCC
SIMULATOR
F F
107
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The purpose of the Dual Stage Selexol Unit portion of the process is to:
Remove the Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) gas from the raw
syngas stream, creating three product streams
o Clean syngas for the combustion turbine, less then TBD ppm H2S
o H2S gas for conversion in the Claus Plant, more then TBD ppm H2S
o CO2 for drying, compression and sequestration, less then TBD % CO2
One train of the two Dual Stage Selexol Unit is shown in flow diagram AGR-FD-2 at the
end of this document. The system is comprised of the following main components:
108
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Referring to AGR-FD-2 at the end of this document is the process description of one
train:
The Selexol Acid Gas Removal Process (AGR) with CO2 Capture removes the
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) gas from the shifted raw syngas
Stream, creating three product streams: clean syngas for the combustion turbine, H2S-
rich acid gas for use in the Claus Plant, and CO2 for sequestration. There are three
major vessels in the AGR process, the H2S Absorber, CO2 Absorber and the Stripper.
Both Absorber columns use Selexol for H2S and CO2 capture. Selexol is a physical
solvent which has an affinity to absorb both CO2 and H2S at high partial pressures and
low temperature and will release those gases when the solvent is depressurized and
heated. CO2 stripping is accomplished by flashing the gas off at various pressures.
H2S is stripped from the Selexol through reboiling and recirculation action.
Raw shifted Syngas from the gasification process is fed to the Selexol H2S Absorber.
Here, the cooled syngas is fed into the lower section of the Absorber below the
Absorber mixing trays. The syngas leaves the top of the H2S absorber. “Loaded”
solvent pumped from the bottom of the CO2 Absorber is cooled in the Loaded Solvent
Coolers and fed to the upper section of the H2S Absorber where it flows down across
the mixing trays. At this point, the solvent absorbs H2S in the syngas and becomes
“rich” solvent. This rich solvent flows out of the bottom of the Absorber through the Rich
Solvent Strainer which removes any solids that may be contained in the liquid. The rich
solvent then flows through a Lean/Rich Heat Exchanger where the rich solvent is
heated by lean solvent coming from the Stripper. After this preheating takes place, the
hot, rich solvent flows to the inlet of the H2S Concentrator where it partially flashed via
depressurization.
The stripped gases from the H2S Concentrator (predominantly CO2) are cooled, dried,
compressed and sent back to the raw syngas inlet of the H2S Absorber. The solvent
leaving the bottom of the H2S Concentrator is sent to the Stripper so that the remaining
gases in the rich solvent are liberated.
The clean or “sweet” fuel syngas flows out of the top to the H2S Absorber to the CO2
Absorber vessel.
Selexol Stripper
In the Stripper, rich solvent is heated in order to separate the H2S from the solvent.
Rich solvent from the H2S Concentrator enters the chimney portion of the Stripper at the
top, and the H2S that is easily separated vaporizes and goes off the top the unit,
together with the rest of the stripped steam and a small portion of the entrained Selexol.
109
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
This acid gas stream is cooled, so the condensed steam and the Selexol will enter the
stripper again as reflux. A small portion of the reflux will be blown off to keep the water
content of the Selexol constant. The solvent in the Selexol stripper is heated in the
Selexol Reboiler. The Reboiler uses low pressure steam (at approximately 50 psig) to
heat the solvent. The stripped steam rises in the column and aids in the separation of
the incoming rich solvent until the H2S exits at the top.
There are two major flows out of the Selexol Stripper, lean solvent that is recirculated
back to the CO2 Absorber from the Stripper bottom, and H2S-rich acid gas that flows out
of the top of the Stripper.
Lean solvent at the bottom of the Stripper is supplied to the inlet of the 2 x 100%
capacity Lean Solvent Pumps. The in-service pump discharges the lean solvent
through a strainer and pumps the lean solvent through the Lean/Rich Heat Exchangers
where the lean solvent is cooled as it preheats the rich solvent flowing to the H2S
Concentrator. The lean solvent then flows through the Lean Solvent Cooler where it is
cooler further prior to entering the chimney of the CO2 Absorber. In the CO2 Absorber,
the solvent cycle begins again by absorbing CO2 in the clean syngas coming from the
H2S Absorber.
The “sour” H2S-rich acid gas that is discharged from the top of the Stripper is routed
through an Acid Gas Cooler, where its temperature is lowered. Steam will condense
and any solvent remaining is removed from the sour gas. The Acid Gas Cooler is air
cooled by multiple speed fans. The exit temperature of the acid is controlled by
modulation of the Acid Gas Cooler Air Vanes. It is desirable to condense all the solvent
while keeping the temperature as high as possible so the H2S gas will not be absorbed
by the solvent. The condensed liquids removed from the acid gas stream are collected
in a Knock Out Drum and pumped back to the Stripper as reflux by either of the 2 x
100% capacity Reflux Pumps, while the acid gas exits from the Knock Out Drum and
leaves the Selexol Unit for processing in the Claus Plant to recover elemental Sulfur
from the H2S gas.
The syngas leaving the H2S absorber is fed into the CO2 absorber. The CO2 Absorber
receives the lean solvent in the chimney portion of the structure near the top. The lean
solvent flows down over the upper tray and mixes with the semi-lean solvent from the
LP Flash Drum being fed at the top of the lower tray. This semi-lean solvent is the
resulting solvent flow after the CO2 Absorption and removal takes place. The gas outlet
of the CO2 absorber contains H2S and CO2.
A portion of the loaded solvent flow from the bottom of the CO2 Absorber is processed
for removal of captured H2 and CO2. The remainder flows to the Loaded Solvent
Pumps and eventually is used in the H2S Absorber.
110
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The loaded solvent splits off for CO2 and H2 removal and is sent through a series of
three flash drums that operate at descending pressures (the first being the highest
pressure). The three drums involved in the CO2 removal process in order of flow are:
the H2 Recovery Drum operating at approximately 300 psia, the Medium Pressure (MP)
Flash Drum operating at approximately 150 psia and the Low Pressure (LP) Flash Drum
operating at approximately 75 psia.
H2 is recovered in the H2 Recovery Drum by flashing the loaded solvent, and then
compressing and cooling the resulting H2 and returning it to the CO2 Absorber syngas
inlet.
CO2 is recovered in the process as the solvent flashes in the MP and LP Flash Drums.
After the CO2 comes out of solution, it is sent to the CO2 Compression Unit.
111
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
112
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
At a minimum, the following primary control schemes will be included as part of the
simulator model:
113
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that there will need to be two Human-Machine Interfaces (HMI) per AGR
train to cover an overall view associated with the Selexol Acid Gas Removal System.
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that one HMI screen will contain the H2S and CO2 Absorber
controls and instrumentation. The other will contain the Stripper Controls and
Instrumentation. (I think this is to less, also the flash drums, heat exchangers, pumps,
concentrator need some place at the screens),
The HMI Screens for the AGR process will include the process mimic controls and
instrumentation shown in AGR-FD-2, and will include:
Process Instrumentation
o Gas Analyzers (8)
o Level Indications (3)
o Pressure Indications (13)
o Temperature Indications (14)
o Differential Pressure Indications (4)
o Flow Indications (5)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
114
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Gas Analyzers (3)
o Level Indications (5)
o Pressure Indications (4)
o Temperature Indications (8)
o Differential Pressure Indications (2)
o Flow Indications (4)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
Process Instrumentation
o Gas Analyzers (8)
o Level Indications (3)
o Pressure Indications (13)
o Temperature Indications (14)
o Differential Pressure Indications (4)
o Flow Indications (5)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
115
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Gas Analyzers (3)
o Level Indications (5)
o Pressure Indications (4)
o Temperature Indications (8)
o Differential Pressure Indications (2)
o Flow Indications (4)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
Plugged Filters
Heat Exchanger Fouling
Foaming in the absorbers due to fouled solvent or to high water content
Improper Selexol / Water ratio
Selexol degradation
Component Failures., e.g. improper output analyzers, malfunctioning of pumps
Process Control Failures, valve position indicators, control valve suddenly on
manual
Running with 1 out of 2 AGR trains
Heat Exchanger Tube Leakage
Gas Piping / Component Leakage
Failure of acid gas coolers (e.g. no fan speed)
Reboiler failure (e.g. steam pressure to low, level condensate pot to high
116
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The Selexol Acid Gas Removal System has the following interconnections with other
plant systems and equipment:
117
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
system described in this Process Description:
Breckinridge, W., Holiday, A., Ong J., Sharp C. (2000). “Use of Selexol Process
in Coke Gasification to Ammonia Project”. Paper presented at Laurence Reid
Gas Conditioning Conference, Norman, Oklahoma.
US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2007a).
DOE/NETL. (2007). Cost and Performance Comparison of Fossil Energy Power
Plants Study Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity.
Available online at http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-
analyses/pubs/Bituminous%20Baseline_Final%20Report.pdf.
Heaven, D., Mak. J., Kubek, D., Clark, M. (2004). Synthesis Gas Purification in
Gasification to Ammonia/Urea Plants. Paper presented at Gasification
Technologies Conference, Washington, D.C. Available online at
http://www.gasification.org/Docs/2004_Papers/26KUBE.pdf.
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2008). Gasification. (2nd Edition). Oxford:
Elsevier.
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2003). Gasification. Oxford: Elsevier
HTC Pure Energy. CO2 Capture Process. Available online at
http://www.htcenergy.com/co2info.html
Snyder, W.G., and Depew, C.A. (1986). Coproduction of carbon dioxide (CO/sub
2/) and electricity. EPRI-AP-4827.
UOP. (2008). Gas Processing: Selexol Process. Available online at
http://www.uop.com/objects/Selexol.pdf.
118
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
TO CO2
DRYING AND
TREATED SYNGAS COMPRESSION
PT PT H2 RECOVERY
GAS
A ANALYZER KNOCK OUT DRUM A
RV-104 CO2 , H2S TE TE LT
RV-105
CW IN
3AB 3BB
CW OUT
LC
CW IN
3AA 3BA
CW OUT
CO2 P-5A P-5B
PT PT FV-006
ABSORBER SEMI-LEAN
H2 RECOVERY
B SOLVENT B
COOLER VENT
PDIT TE TE PUMPS
GAS
PT
H2 RECOVERY ANALYZER
COMPRESSOR
TE
H2
CO2 RECOVERY VENT
ABSORBER DRUM
LT
C GAS LEVEL HP FLASH C
ANALYZER CONTROL DRUM
H2S
LP FLASH
LOADED DRUM
P-1A SOLVENT
PUMPS
PT PT
FT P-1B
RV-101 FROM STRIPPED TE TE
RV-102 GAS COMPRESSOR
CW IN
D D
1AB 1BB
PT PT CW OUT
FV-001
TE TE
CW IN
CW IN 1AA 1BA
FT 2AB 2BB CW OUT
SELEXOL H2S CW OUT
ABSORBER PT LEAN PT
PDIT SOLVENT
COOLERS
CW IN TE TE
E
FV-002 2AA 2BA E
FT CW OUT
LEGEND
PT PT FROM LEAN / RICH Rich Solvent
LOADED
RAW HEAT EXCHANGER Lean Solvent
TE SOLVENT Liquid
SYNGAS Vapor
TE COOLERS TE
LT Liquid/Vapor Mixture
Loaded Solvent
CO2 Capture
ABSORBER H2 Recovery Liquid
FT
BOTTOMS LEVEL Condensate/Cooling Water
CONTROL FOSSIL CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
H2S, COLUMBIA, MARYLAND, USA
QT FT
CO2 TO LEAN / RICH DOE-NETL-IGCC
F HEAT EXCHANGER SIMULATOR F
FV-003 (On AGR-FD-4)
RICH AGR WITH CO2 CAPTURE
H2S SOLVENT
FLOW DIAGRAM
CONTROL STRAINER
F-010 PDIT DATE DRAWING NO. REV.
05/28/2008 AGR-FD-3 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
119
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
TO CLAUS
PLANT
TE
AIR VANE
CONTROL
A A
H2S
CONCEN- ACID GAS
TRATOR KNOCK OUT
DRUM LEVEL
PDIT
CONTROL REFLUX
PT PUMPS
STRIPPED GAS
LT KNOCK OUT P-3B P-3A
LC REFLUX
C TE DRUM C
BLEED
LT
FT
FV-005
LC
PT TE
TE FT
FT RV-103
D D
PDIT SELEXOL
STRIPPER
FT
FROM RICH FV-004
SOLVENT
STRAINER REBOILER
(On AGR-FD-3) TEMP PT REBOILER
CONTROL STEAM
PT
CONTROL
TE CONDENSATE
TE CONDENSATE LT POT LEVEL
TE POT
COND. CONTROL
50# STEAM
E E
STEAM FT
TO LEAN
LEAN / RICH HEATER LEGEND
SOLVENT
HEAT EXCHANGER LT Rich Solvent
COOLERS STEAM Lean Solvent
HX - 1A / 1B
LCV-001 Liquid
1C / 1D STRIPPER Vapor
BOTTOMS LEVEL Liquid/Vapor Mixture
Loaded Solvent
C A LEAN SOLVENT CONTROLLER CO2 Capture
STRAINER H2 Recovery Liquid
F-020 Condensate/Cooling Water
P-2A FV-007
FOSSIL CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
COLUMBIA, MARYLAND, USA
LEAN TO SUMP
DOE-NETL-IGCC
F
SOLVENT SIMULATOR F
FT
D B PUMPS
P-2B AGR WITH CO2 CAPTURE
FROM SELEXOL MAKEUP
AND ANTI FOAM FLOW DIAGRAM
PDIT P-4 DATE DRAWING NO. REV.
05/28/2008 AGR-FD-4 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
120
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Compress, and dry the captured CO2 to the plant fence for transport and
sequestration or sale.
Each The CO2 Compression train portion of the process is comprised of the following
main components:
Each CO2 Compression Train consists of a, five stage, intercooled, centrifugal CO2
Compressor connected to a Glycol dehydration system. Each compressor receives
CO2 at two different pressure levels from the CO2 capture portion of the Selexol Acid
Gas Removal System and raises the CO2 pressure from atmospheric, to about 2200 psi.
As a part of this process, the CO2 undergoes a phase shift from gas to supercritical fluid.
The CO2 from the LP Flash Drum of the Selexol system enters at the CO2 Compression
system at the 1st Stage Suction Drum. The CO2 from the MP Flash Drum of the Selexol
system enters the CO2 Compression system at the discharge of the 1st Stage
Aftercooler.
The pressure of the CO2 is raised as the gas passes from stage to stage. When the
CO2 reaches the end of the fourth stage, it passes to a Glycol Tower where the CO2 is
dried by mixing with Tri-ethylene Glycol, thereby minimizing the possibility of corrosion
in the transport piping due to moisture being present.
121
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that the CO2 Compression System will be a first principle / high fidelity
model that allows the operator to complete the startup, shutdown and normal operation
and monitoring of system equipment.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the CO2 Compression System. Each of these issues will
impact the training effectiveness of the simulator and shall be taken into account when
developing the model. In order to address these issues and achieve the fidelity of
simulation desired for research and operator training, the simulator model of the CO2
Compression System, the following parameters should be addressed in the model at a
minimum:
122
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included as part of the simulator
model:
Note: Valves and controls for CO2 Compression Train 2 are the same as 1. The
difference in numbering is the leading numeral being a “1” vice a “0”. (e.g. LV-140 vice
LV-040)
123
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that there will need to be two Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens
associated with the CO2 Compression System.
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that each HMI screen will contain the CO2 Compression System
controls and instrumentation,
The two HMI Screens for the CO2 Compression System will include the process mimic,
controls and instrumentation shown in COC-FD-001 and will include:
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (5)
o Pressure Indications (5)
o Differential Pressure Indications (1)
o Temperature Indications (6)
o Flow Indications (1)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
o H2O Dewpoint
The HMI for CO2 Compression System B will be exactly the same as CO2 Compression
System A with the following exceptions:
The inlet and discharge cross connections will read, “To Train 1”, and “From
Train 1” respectively.
PV-146 (Compressor A Discharge Pressure Control Valve) will receive an input
from the Combined CO2 Discharge Pressure Controller.
124
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (5)
o Pressure Indications (5)
o Differential Pressure Indications (1)
o Temperature Indications (6)
o Flow Indications (1)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
o H2O Dewpoint
125
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
system described in this Process Description:
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2008). Gasification. (2nd Edition). Oxford:
Elsevier.
Higman, C, and Van der Burgt, M. (2003). Gasification. Oxford: Elsevier
HTC Pure Energy. CO2 Compression. Available online at
http://www.htcenergy.com/co2info.html.
In-Salah Gas. The In-Salah CCS Experience, Sonatrach, Algeria. Available
online at http://www.opec.org/home/Press%20Room/EU-
OPEC%20presentations/HaddadjiSonatrach%20Algeria.pdf
US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2007a).
DOE/NETL. (2007). Cost and Performance Comparison of Fossil Energy Power
Plants Study Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity.
Available online at http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-
analyses/pubs/Bituminous%20Baseline_Final%20Report.pdf.
126
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A A
TE
PV-049
PT
VENT TO
ATMOSPHERE
PV-042 PV-043 PV-044 PV-045
PV-041
C C
CO2 DISCHARGE
PRESSURE
CONTROL
PT
D PV-046 MOV-047 D
LT LT LT LT LT
FT
CO2
SUCTION DRUM
PT
AFTER COOLER
PT PT PT TE TO CO2 PIPELINE
TE
TE TE TE
M 1ST STAGE 2ND STAGE 3RD STAGE 4TH STAGE 5TH STAGE
E E
TO DRAIN
LEGEND
DOE-NETL-IGCC
SIMULATOR
F F
FLOW DIAGRAM
04/02/2008 COC-FD-001 B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
127
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Reheat the syngas prior to the expansion process so that there is no risk of the
expander outlet temperature dropping below the dew point of the gas.
Lower the pressure of syngas while making power prior to sending the fuel to the
combustion turbine
Each train of the portion of the process is comprised of the following main components:
Clean syngas from the AGR system is combined with a small amount of clean gas from
the CO2 compression process and heated to 465°F using Cold Reheat steam before
passing through an expansion turbine.
The temperature of the syngas entering the Expander will be controlled by varying the
amount of steam entering the Fuel Gas Reheater. Using the Expander inlet
temperature as the lead control value should also provide better system response. The
condensed steam from the Fuel Gas Reheater will be routed to the condenser. Since
there is a concern with the expander outlet temperature dropping too low, a temperature
alarm on the expander outlet shall be provided.
Pressure control of the Syngas entering the Expander will be based on the Syngas
pressure upstream of the Fuel Gas Heater and pressure relief to flare. Based on this
setup, the combustion turbine will control the Expander backpressure.
The capability to bypass the Fuel Gas Expander will be included in the event of an
Expander trip or during startup. The bypass will include a pressure reducing station that
can accommodate startup conditions as well as a full load Expander trip. Isolation
valves for both the Expander and the pressure reducing station in the bypass line shall
be included.
128
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that the System will be a functional model that allows the operator to
complete the startup, shutdown and normal monitoring of system equipment.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the System. Each of these issues will impact the training
effectiveness of the simulator and shall be taken into account when developing the
model. In order to address these issues and achieve the fidelity of simulation desired
for research and operator training of the simulator model of the System, the following
parameters should be addressed in the model at a minimum:
System pressures, flows, levels, temperatures and turbine power output will
respond to changes in system operation.
Ambient temperature.
12.3. Controls
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included as part of the simulator
model:
Note: Valves and controls for Syngas Reheat and Expansion Unit Train 2 are the same
as 1. The difference in numbering is the leading numeral being a “1” vice a “0”. (e.g.
TCV-101 vice TCV-001)
129
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that there will need to be two Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screens
associated with the System.
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that each HMI screen will contain the System controls and
instrumentation,
The two HMI Screens for the System will include the process mimic, controls and
instrumentation shown in RHE-FD-001 and will include:
System A HMI:
System B HMI:
130
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Trip of Fuel Gas Expander – Syngas will be bypass the Fuel Gas Expander and
throttled to the appropriate pressure
Slow reaction of transfer to bypass on expander trip –release of gas to flare.
Flare indication/alarm – open (or not closed) position of PV-003 and PV-103 can
be used to signify this event
Slow reaction of transfer to bypass on expander trip – drop of inlet pressure to
gas turbine.
Loss of steam – Low temperature alarm on Expander exit.
12.6. Interconnections
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
systems described in this Process Description:
131
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A A
B
COLD B
REHEAT
STEAM TCV-001
CO2 VENT
FROM CO2 TC PC
COMPRESSOR FUEL GAS
REHEATER
SYNGAS
TO GAS
FROM AGR
C TURBINE C
SYSTEM PV-001
~
FUEL GAS
EXPANDER
D D
TO TRAIN 2 PV-002
TO CONDENSER
E E
LEGEND
Sweet Syngas
Condensate
Cold Reheat Steam
CO2
DOE-IGCC
SIMULATOR
F F
06/25/2008 RHE-FD-001 A1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
132
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
O2 Heater
Sour Gas Heater
Acid Gas Heater
Claus Furnace
Waste Heat Boiler
Sulfur Condensers (3)
Converter Preheaters (2)
Sulfur Converters (2)
There is only one, oxygen-blown Claus Plant that receives acid gas from the AGR
system and sour gas from the sour water stripper. The Claus process converts H2S to
elemental sulfur.
The first reaction shown below is thermal and occurs in the reaction furnace. The
furnace temperature should be high enough to destroy any ammonia in the acid gas.
One-third of the H2S is oxidized to SO2. The newly formed SO2 reacts with the
remaining H2S to form elemental sulfur. Since these reactions are highly exothermic, a
waste heat boiler, which recovers this heat to generate high-pressure steam while
cooling the process stream, usually follows the furnace. Sulfur is condensed in a
condenser that follows the high-pressure steam recovery section and is drained through
a seal leg to the sulfur pit. Low-pressure steam is raised in the condenser from further
cooling of the process gas.
133
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The tail gas from the first condenser then goes to two catalytic conversion stages,
where the remaining sulfur is recovered via the Claus reaction:
The Claus reaction is catalytic and equilibrium limited. The sulfur in the vapor phase
exists as S2, S6, and S8 molecular species, with the S2 predominant at higher
temperatures, and S8 predominant at lower temperatures.
Each catalytic stage consists of gas preheat (in the Converter Preheater), a catalytic
reactor (Sulfur Converter), and a Sulfur Condenser. Gas preheating is required prior to
entering the catalytic reactor to avoid sulfur condensing in the catalyst bed. In the
catalytic reactor, the Claus reaction takes place over a fixed bed of activated alumina
catalyst in which sulfur is formed. The reacted process gases then flow to the sulfur
condenser and are cooled while condensed sulfur drains to the sulfur pit. After the
second catalytic stage, the tail gas proceeds to the hydrogenation reactor for further
processing.
There are number of commercial Claus Plant configurations available from several
licensors. The selected process is very simple and straight forward. The temperatures
needed to convert NH3 and HCN will only be achieved when the H2S concentration is
high enough; otherwise, additional natural gas will be needed. Insufficient conversion of
NH3 and HCN will lead to the formation of ammonia salts, which will block the liquid
sulfur pipe lines. Also a natural gas (NG) burner is needed to heat the plant to start it up.
This summary describes the “Jacobs” configuration, with NG addition to all the Claus
sections. In case the selected process for the generic model is different, the NG burner
from the first catalytical step can be left out of the model.
In the process flow diagram at the end of this document, the NG burners and their
control are added to the catalytical steps. The temperature control of the steam heaters
has not been taken out of the PFD but can be removed if a Claus model with burners
has been selected.
It is anticipated that the System will be a functional model that allows the operator to
complete the startup, shutdown and normal monitoring of system equipment.
134
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the System. Each of these issues will impact the training
effectiveness of the simulator and shall be taken into account when developing the
model. In order to address these issues and achieve the fidelity of simulation desired
for research and operator training of the simulator model of the System, the following
parameters should be addressed in the model at a minimum:
135
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
13.3. Controls
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included as part of the simulator
model:
136
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
It is anticipated that there will need to be one Human-Machine Interface (HMI) Screen
associated with the System.
The HMI Screen shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that each HMI screen will contain the System controls and
instrumentation,
The HMI Screen for the System will include the process mimic, controls and
instrumentation shown in SRU-FD-001 and will include:
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (4)
o Pressure Indications (4)
o Temperature Indications (5)
o Flow Indications (9)
o H2S Analyzer (on Acid Gas line)
o H2S – SO2 Analyzer (on line to Hydrogenation)
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
137
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
13.6. Interconnections
Sour Gas from Sour Water Stripper
95% Pure O2 from ASU
Acid Gas from Selexol AGR System
Heat Exchangers Condensate to Medium Pressure Flash System
I/P Boiler Feedwater to Sulfur Condenser
HP Steam from WHB to Hydrogenation Reactor Preheater
LP Steam to 65 psia Steam Header
MP Steam to Sulfur Pit Vent Ejector
Sulfur to Storage
Tail gas to Hydrogenation
Sour gas to flare
Acid gas to flare
Natural Gas from distribution
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
systems described in this Process Description:
US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2007a).
DOE/NETL. (2007). Cost and Performance Comparison of Fossil Energy Power
Plants Study Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity. Available
online at http://www.netl.doe.gov/energyanalyses/
pubs/Bituminous%20Baseline_Final%20Report.pdf.
Systems Analyses of Advanced Brayton Cycles for High Efficiency Zero
Emission Plants, Topical Report, Task 1.3: Baseline IGCC Plant Systems Study,
Update 2, November 2006, Advanced Power and Energy Program, University of
California.
138
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
TO TGTU
SOUR GAS
A
FROM STRIPPER A
TO FLARE TCV-004 TCV-005
CONVERTER CONVERTER
PREHEATER PREHEATER
95% O2 SOUR GAS
FROM ASU HEATER
PV-005 TC TC
CD TO
PC MP FLASH
B HS B
O2 FC FV-006
FV-005 FV-004 AIR FV-007 NG
HEATER AIR NG
PC TC TC
FV-001 PV-003 FC FC
OXYGEN FC FC
CONTROL FC
SULFUR SULFUR
FV-008
CONVERTER CONVERTER TO 65 PSIA
WASTE STEAM HEADER
CLAUS LC
HEAT
C FURNACE C
BOILER
PV-004
FV-009
SULFUR PC SULFUR PC SULFUR H2S-
TC CONDENSER CONDENSER CONDENSER SO2
FC
LCV-001
TO
HS FC LC
LC HYDRO-
D
GENATION D
LCV-002 LCV-003
ECONOMIZED BFW
PC
I/P BFW
PV-006
FV-002 ACID GAS
HEATER TO FLARE
VENT EJECTOR
FV-003
FC FC MP STEAM
H2 S NG AIR
E E
LEGEND
LC
STARTUP ONLY TO SULFUR STORAGE Sour Gas Condensate
I/P BFW Tail Gas
Acid Gas Natural Gas
ACID GAS 95% Pure O2 Air
FROM AGR Steam
Sulfur
DOE-IGCC
SIMULATOR
F SULFUR PIT F
CLAUS PLANT
06/23/2008 SRU-FD-001 B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
139
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Hydrogenate the remaining sulfur compounds in the Claus plant tail gas to H2S
in a catalytic hydrogenation reactor.
Supply tail gas to the Selexol Acid Gas Removal Process
The portions of the process are comprised of the following main components:
The tail gas from the Claus plant usually contains small but varying quantities of COS,
CS2, SO2, and elemental sulfur vapors. Sulfur recovery is increased by converting
these remaining sulfur compounds in the tail gas to H2S and then compressing the tail
gas and returning it to the Selexol AGR process.
The tail gas is first preheated in the Reactor Preheater with HP steam produced from
the Claus Waste Heat Boiler. The inlet temperature to the Hydrogenation Reactor is
controlled by adjusting the HP steam rate. An analyzer on the tail gas measures the H2
content of the stream and, if required, treated fuel gas from the Acid Gas Removal unit
is added to the reactor feed. The heated tail gas is hydrogenated where sulfur
compounds are reduced at elevated temperature. The following hydrogenation and
hydrolysis reactions occur in the hydrogenation reactor:
S + H2 → H2S
140
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The reactions are exothermic, and heat is removed from the gas in the Gas Cooler,
which produces LP steam.
The gas is further cooled in a Direct Contact Condenser (or Quench Tower). The gas
enters the condenser below the bottom trays and is contacted with caustic so that any
sulfur dioxide remaining in the gas is captured. The column bottoms is recycled in a
circulating loop and spent caustic is periodically removed from the loop and routed to
the effluent bio-treatment unit. Water from the Direct Contact Condenser is also
recycled with the following controls:
The scrubbed gas then flows up the condenser for direct quenching with water. The
water is removed from the chimney tray in the middle of the condenser and cooled in an
air cooler followed by a trim cooler with cooling water. If required, sour water is removed
from the system to maintain the water balance (flow rate is varied to control the liquid
level on the chimney tray). A portion of the water from the cooling loop may also be
diverted to the lower section of the condenser to maintain the liquid level in the bottom
of the column.
The contact condenser overhead gas is sent to the Tail Gas Knockout Drum to remove
entrained liquid before entering the Tail Gas Compressor. The compressed tail gas is
recycled back to the Acid Gas Removal unit.
141
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
There are several hydrogenation process designs available from different licensors. In
this process summary description, the gas is heated by a steam heater. Other viable
designs utilize a furnace in which the gas from the Claus Plant is heated by burning
natural gas sub-stoichiometrically with air and providing a reducing gas that is needed
for the catalytic hydrogenation.
It is anticipated that the System will be a functional model that allows the operator to
complete the startup, shutdown and normal monitoring of system equipment.
There are a number of operational issues and considerations that control the
performance and reliability of the System. Each of these issues will impact the training
effectiveness of the simulator and shall be taken into account when developing the
model. In order to address these issues and achieve the fidelity of simulation desired
for research and operator training of the simulator model of the System, the following
parameters should be addressed in the model at a minimum:
142
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
14.3. Controls
At a minimum, the following control schemes will be included as part of the simulator
model:
The HMI Screen shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that each HMI screen will contain the System controls and
instrumentation,
The HMI Screen for the System will include the process mimic, controls and
instrumentation shown in TGT-FD-001 and will include:
Analog Control Loops:
o Tail Gas Temperature Control
o Gas Cooler Level Control
o Direct Contact Condenser Bottoms Level Control
o Direct Contact Condenser Level Control
o Tail Gas Knockout Drum Level Control
o Gas Cooler Steam Outlet Pressure Control
o Tail Gas Outlet of Tail Gas Compressor Pressure Control
o Direct Contact Condenser Temperature Control
o Caustic flow recycle flow control
o Clean syngas flow control
Digital Control Loops:
143
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Process Instrumentation
o Level Indications (4)
o Pressure Indications (2)
o Temperature Indications (5)
o Flow Indications (3)
o H2 Analyzer at inlet of Hydrogenation Reactor
o H2 Analyzer at inlet of Tail Gas Compressor
o pH Analyzer on the DCC recycle water loop
o Valve Position Indications for all operable valves
14.6. Interconnections
144
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The following references served as a basis for the conceptual design of each of the
systems described in this Process Description:
145
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
H2
TAIL GAS PC FT
A
COMPRESSOR A
FROM CLAUS TAIL GAS
WASTE HEAT TAIL GAS
KO DRUM RECYCLE
BOILER TCV-001 TO AGR
PV-002
TC SYSTEM
TAIL GAS LC
FROM CLAUS FROM TAIL GAS
SULFUR CONDENSER COMPRESSOR
INTERCOOLERS
HYDROGENATION
B REACTOR B
PREHEATER
CD TO
MP FLASH LCV-004
CLEAN SYNGAS
FC pH
FROM AGR LCV-003
FV-001 TO SOUR WATER
DIRECT
H2 GAS CONTACT KNOCKOUT DRUM
ANALYZER
FV-002 TC
C CONDENSER C
TCV-002
LC COOLING WATER
TI
DCC
RECYCLED
PUMP
WATER
HYDROGENATION LP STEAM COOLER
TI
REACTOR
TI
PV-001
D D
PC LCV-002
GAS COOLER
LC FV-003
LC
FC
E
LCV-001 E
SPENT LEGEND
CAUSTIC
Fossil Consulting Services, Inc.
PUMP Columbia, Maryland
DOE-IGCC
SIMULATOR
F F
HYDROGENATION REACTOR
HYDROGENATION REACTOR
06/23/2008 TGT-FD-001 B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
146
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Each combustion turbine shall be associated with a Heat Recovery Steam Generator
(HRSG) designed to recover the energy in the hot combustion turbine exhaust gas. The
combustion turbines are not able to operate in simple cycle mode. Under standard
conditions (59 degrees F., 29.92 in. hg.), each combustion turbine/generator assembly
shall be capable of delivering 232 MW on syngas fuel, and 185 MW on natural gas.
Compressor
The compressor shall be an axial flow design with 18 progressive stages housed at the
forward end of the turbine compartment on a common shaft with the power turbine.
Combustion System
The combustion system utilized within each combustion turbine shall be comprised of 14
interconnected combustion chambers (“combustors”). These combustors are housed on
the compressor discharge wrapper aft of the compressor, prior to the power turbine.
This system also includes the fuel nozzles, a spark plug ignition system, flame detectors,
false start drains, and crossfire tubes.
147
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Power Turbine
The three-stage power turbine section is the area in which energy in the form of high
temperature pressurized gas, produced by the compressor and combustion sections, is
converted to mechanical energy. Power turbine hardware includes:
• Turbine rotor
• Turbine casing
• Exhaust frame
• Exhaust diffuser
• Nozzles (stationary blades)
• Shrouds
Exhaust
Downstream of the power turbine is the exhaust duct. The purpose of the exhaust duct
is to provide a flow path through which the gases used to power the turbine wheels are
redirected to a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). The gas turbine exhaust system
consists of a diffuser duct section that carries the hot exhaust gases from the exhaust
frame diffuser to the exhaust ducting.
148
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Air enters the compressor through the inlet filters, evaporative cooler and Inlet Guide
Vanes. For purposes of pressure-flow calculations, the filter is considered a flow
admittance that is set constant for normal operation and can be failed low by the
instructor. The evaporative cooler is considered to be a flow boundary that adds some
water vapor to the air. IGV admittance is modulated by demand from the DCS via a
non-linear characteristic.
Pco T
= ε ( Fcomp ci , N )
Pci Pci
Air after the compressor is passed through the Combustion Chamber and the
combustor bypass valves to the turbine inlet. Some part of the air can be also passed
to the turbine exhaust through bleed valves. A portion of the air from the compressor
discharge and an interstage takeoff is routed to the rotor and turbine wheelspaces for
cooling. Another portion of air after compressor is delivered to the compressor inlet via
Inlet Bleed Heat valve (IHB). Fuel flow is also conveyed to the turbine inlet. The
resulting flow pressure network is shown on Figure 4.
Pti T
= δ ( Fturb ti , N )
Pto Pti
The characteristics of passive flow elements (valves and pipes) are linear:
Air and gas pressures are determined from simultaneous solution of all the equations
above and mass conservation equations.
1
Since there is no plant data available for this very important characteristic, the model will utilize generic
compressor curves from textbooks. Generic characteristics may differ from those of the actual plant, as
will the performance of the simulator.
2
Likewise, the model will utilize a generic turbine curve from textbooks.
149
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
N2 & Syngas
Steam
Air
Evaporative
Cooler Water
IHB
Cooling Air
Bleed
Compressed air, dilution nitrogen, steam, and syngas and/or natural gas enter the
combustion chamber, where the fuels are combined with dilution nitrogen and steam
and burned, provided the flame is ignited. Although modeled as 14 combustors, the
actual combustion zone will be modeled as a single combustion area, with fuel and air
evenly distributed among combustors. Syngas and natural gas, steam and nitrogen
shall be injected into the combustion zone by separate sets of nozzles.
150
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
If the fuel/air ratio at combustion area is within flammability limits, the ignition can be
started with either of 14 spark plugs controlled from the DCS. The instructor, with a
particular malfunction, can fail ignition. If the flame is ignited, outputs of four flame
detectors are set true, unless failed by the instructor. If the fuel/air ratio goes beyond
flammability limits, the flame will be lost.
The model shall determine fuel/air ratios after mixing points and finds the location at
which the mixture becomes flammable. The actual flame location will be shifted
downstream from this point by a value proportional to fuel/gas flow through the
combustion chamber.
The composition of each fuel is characterized by its heating value and chemical make-
up. For a given composition, the required amount of air for combustion is calculated
based on the chemical reaction:
Any trace amounts of sulfur in the syngas shall be treated in the following manner
during combustion:
H2S + (3/2 O2) → H2O + SO2
Air includes moisture, which is calculated from the air humidity external parameter set
by the instructor, the moisture acquired in evaporative cooler, and water injected into
combustors.
Based on the moisture content of the air and the chemical composition of fuel and
combustion products, this model calculates properties of air, fuel and gas such as
molecular weight, specific heat and adiabatic exponent.
Evaporative Cooling
The air is drawn into the evaporative cooler filled with wet media. Water evaporates
from the media and mixes with the air, cooling it. The amount of water evaporated will
depend on the ambient air temperature and humidity, air flow through the cooler and the
amount of water in the cooler media.
151
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Air Compressor
Compression of air in the compressor can be described as an almost adiabatic
(efficiency ηc < 1.0) process from pressure Pin to pressure Pout:
γ −1
P
γ
= 1 + out − 1 ηc
H out
H in Pin
Fcomp H in Pout γ
Bc = − 1 ηc
ω Pin
Compressor efficiency is a function of air-flow Fcomp, CT speed, air inlet temperature and
pressure, multiplied by the instructor-set factor to represent degraded performance.
Turbine
Gas in the turbine expands almost adiabatically (efficiency ηt < 1.0) from pressure Pin to
pressure Pout:
γ −1
P
γ
= 1 − 1 − out η
H out
H in Pin t
152
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Turbine efficiency is a function of gas flow Fg, CT speed, gas inlet temperature and
pressure.
dω
I = Bt + Bsm − Bc − Bloss
dt
When synchronized, the CT speed is set equal to the grid frequency, and power is
calculated from the equation:
153
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
H = Cp * T
Enthalpies are carried with air/gas flows from point to point and heat is put into the
system due to compressor work and fuel combustion. Heat is removed from the system
due to turbine work and heat transfer to ambient. Heat is transferred between air/gas
and metal. Heat transfer is described by the equation:
Where coefficient K = const * flow0.8 for gas/air-to-metal and K = const for metal-to-
ambient.
154
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Mist Eliminators
The eliminators are controlled by the instructor with three remote functions: two of them
representing control switches with HAND, OFF and AUTO positions and the third one
representing a selector switch with PUMP1 and PUMP2 positions. The instructor can
start an eliminator at any time by setting the relevant RF to HAND, provided the AC
power is available and lube oil pressure is greater than 6 PSIG, or stop the running
eliminator by setting the RF to OFF. When in AUTO, the eliminator will start
automatically, if it is not selected with the third RF and the reservoir pressure is above –
2” H2O and the power supply is healthy.
155
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
156
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
with the third RF and oil pressure is below 1100 PSIG and power supply is healthy. It
will not stop automatically.
The instructor will be able to fail lubricating oil pressure to any value between 0 and
1200 PSIG to simulate a leak, by initiating the Hydraulic Oil Pressure malfunction.
Turning Gear
The Turning Gear is controlled by the instructor with a remote function representing
control switch with HAND, OFF and AUTO positions. The instructor can start the gear
at any time by setting the relevant RF to HAND, or stop the running gear by setting the
RF to OFF. When in AUTO, the gear will start automatically if it is requested to start
from DCS. It will also stop automatically when it is no longer requested to start from
DCS. The DC power to the gear is always available.
Static Starter
The DCS configures various generator breakers. During the startup sequence, the field
breaker closes and energizes the exciter. Other breaker connects the generator to the
Load Commutated Inverter which drives the generator with variable frequency voltage
to the 90% of the synchronous speed, after which the control system disconnects the
static starter.
The bearing oil outlet temperatures are normally given by the metal temperature minus
9° F.
157
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Turbine Vibrations
Vibrations are monitored at four journal bearings and can be affected by lubricating oil
temperature, critical speeds and instructor-set malfunction. Vibrations will be higher
also, if the turbine was started from standstill (instead of off the turning gear). All
vertical and horizontal proximitors and seismometers for the same bearing will act
proportionally. Thrust bearing proximitors will read values dependent on the turbine
load.
Vibration Monitor
If vibration at any bearing exceeds 5.75 mils, the vibration alarm signal is sent to the
DCS. If vibration at any bearing exceeds 8.5 mils, the vibration trip signal is sent to the
DCS. These signals are maintained until the Monitor receives a reset command from
the DCS. The instructor can fail the monitor with a particular malfunction. In this case
the vibration alarm and trip signals are inhibited and the monitor status alarm is sent.
Table 1-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
mfCT101 CT A Inlet Filter Clogged (% degradation) 0 100 VR
mfCT102 CT A Ignitors Failure 0 1 DG 0 1
mfCT103 CT A Flame Detectors Failure 0 1 DG 0 1
mfCT104 CT A Lube Oil Pressure Low (header pressure, psig) 0 15 VR
mfCT105 CT A Hydraulic Oil Pressure Low (header pressure, psig) 0 1200 VR
mfCT106A CT A Collector End Bearing Oil Temperature High (increase, deg F) 0 100 VR
mfCT106B CT A Turbine End Bearing Oil Temperature High (increase, deg F) 0 100 VR
mfCT106C CT A Inlet End Bearing Oil Temperature High (increase, deg F) 0 100 VR
mfCT106D CT A Exhaust End Bearing Oil Temperature High (increase, deg F) 0 100 VR
mfCT107 CT A Thrust Bearing Oil Temperature High (increase, deg F) 0 100 VR
mfCT108A CT A Collector End Bearing Vibration High (multiplier) 0 10 VR
mfCT108B CT A Turbine End Bearing Vibration High (multiplier) 0 10 VR
mfCT108C CT A Inlet End Bearing Vibration High (multiplier) 0 10 VR
mfCT108D CT A Exhaust End Bearing Vibration High (multiplier) 0 10 VR
mfCT109 CT A Thrust Bearing Proximity Meter Reading High (multiplier) 0 15 VR
158
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 1-2
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
rfCT101A CT A AC Lube Oil Pump A Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT101B CT A AC Lube Oil Pump B Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT102 CT A AC Lube Oil Pump Selector Switch 0 2 DG PUMP1 PUMP2
rfCT103 CT A Emergency Lube Oil Pump Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT104 CT A Main Seal Oil Pump Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT105 CT A DC Seal Oil Pump Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT106A CT A Mist Eliminator A Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT106B CT A Mist Eliminator B Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT107A CT A Hydraulic Oil Pump A Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT107B CT A Hydraulic Oil Pump B Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT108 CT A Hydraulic Oil Pump Selector Switch 0 2 DG PUMP1 PUMP2
rfCT109 CT A Turning Gear Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT110 CT A Compressor Efficiency Multiplier 0.8 1.1 VR
rfCT111A CT A Exhaust Frame Cooling Fan A Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT111B CT A Exhaust Frame Cooling Fan B Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
rfCT112A CT A Bearing Cooling Fan A Control Switch 0 2 DG HAND OFF AUTO
159
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 1-3
Tag Description Lo Hi Initial Value
EP001 Ambient Air Temperature, deg F 14 104 59
EP002 Ambient Air Humidity, % 0 100 60
EP014 Ambient air pressure feet ASL 0 10000 0
EP012 Electrical System Grid Voltage, kV 450 550 500
EP013 Electrical System Grid Frequency, Hz 55 65 60
160
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
161
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
where it is heated with the feedwater. After the heat exchanger gas passes a set of four
control valves on which its pressure is reduced, and through two parallel filter-
separators. The instructor shall have the capability to clog either filter any variable
amount. The instructor shall also have four remote functions to set levels in the liquid
separators to initiate relevant alarms in the DCS. Filtered natural gas is distributed
among the two units via a shared header.
Dilution steam for NOx control shall be supplied to each combustion turbine as cold
reheat steam by its respective heat recovery steam generators.
Table 2-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
mfNG001A Natural Gas Fuel Filter #1 Clogged (% degradation) 0 100 VR
mfNG001B Natural Gas Fuel Filter #2 Clogged (% degradation) 0 100 VR
Table 2-2
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
rfNG001A BOP Fuel Gas Filter #1 Level 0 100 VR
rfNG001B BOP Fuel Gas Filter #2 Level 0 100 VR
162
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 2-3
Tag Description Lo Hi Initial Value
epNG001 Fuel Gas Carbon Content, % weight 0 100 75
epNG002 Fuel Gas Hydrogen Content, % weight 0 100 25
epNG003 Fuel Gas Supply Pressure, psig 0 500 450
epNG004 Fuel Gas Supply Temperature (at FG Htr. Inlet) -100 100 40
epNG005 Fuel Gas Heating Value, BTU/SCF 900 1100 1014
Dilution steam for NOx control shall be supplied to each combustion turbine as cold
reheat steam by its respective heat recovery steam generators. Additionally, when
operating on syngas a metered amount of dilution N2 shall be supplied from the air
separation unit.
163
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
164
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 2-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
mfSG201 Loss of syngas supply, Train 1 0 1 DG 0-False, 1-True
mfSG202 Loss of syngas supply, Train 2 0 1 DG 0-False, 1-True
mfSG202 Loss of nitrogen supply, Train 1 0 1 DG 0-False, 1-True
mfSG202 Loss of nitrogen supply, Train 2 0 1 DG 0-False, 1-True
Table 2-2
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
rfSGxxx None Defined 0 0
Table 2-3
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
epSG01 Boundary Syngas Source Selected Train A 0 1 DG 0-False, 1-True
epSG02 Syngas supply pressure (psi), Train A 0 500 VR
epSG03 Syngas supply temperature (deg F.), Train A 250 750 VR
epSG04 Syngas CO2 Composition (%), Train A 0 100 VR
epSG05 Syngas Hydrogen Content % 0 100 VR
epSG06 Syngas Argon Content % 0 5 VR
epSG07 Syngas Methane Content % 0 50 VR
epSG08 Syngas Carbon Monoxide Content % 0 75 VR
epSG06 Syngas Heating Value, BTU/SCF 700 1000 VR
epSG07 Boundary Syngas Source Selected Train B 0 1 DG 0-False, 1-True
epSG08 Syngas supply pressure (%), Train B 0 110 VR
epSG09 Syngas supply temperature (%), Train B 0 110 VR
epSG010 Syngas CO2 Composition (%), Train A 0 100 VR
epSG011 Syngas Hydrogen Content (%) 0 100 VR
165
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Air after each compressor is passed to the Air Dryers with pre-filter and after-filter. The
instructor will be able to clog these filters with a particular malfunction, which will cause
a decrease in the IA pressure after the filters and, delta-P alarms in the DCS. Normally,
this pressure will be 110 PSIG. The instructor will also have malfunctions to initiate a
‘trouble’ alarm for the dryer, IA moisture alarm and high level in air receiver alarms.
15.7.4. IA Pressure
Instrument air for Combustion Turbine equipment may come from any of three sources:
Exhaust Cooling Frame Blowers, Bearing Cooling Air Blowers and discharge of main
compressor. The target value for IA pressure supply will be the maximum of these three,
but not greater than 110 PSIG. Actual IA pressure will follow its target over a particular
time lag.
Control loops and logic arrays shall be constructed using standard discrete process
control and logic objects. The use of “multi-function” or macro objects shall be avoided.
All objects shall be labeled with both their specific object name and their function. All
inputs, outputs, constants, and coefficients shall be appropriately labeled as to their
function. Additionally, output tags shall bear the name of the parent object in its naming
convention.
166
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Control Loops:
Engine Speed and Load Control (Fuel and LCI Starter)
Exhaust Temperature (Inlet Guide Vanes)
Generator Excitation
Logic Arrays:
Engine Start Permissives
Load Limiting and Runbacks
Engine Trips
Generator Protection (Load, Voltage, and Reactive Limits)
Generator Breakers and Synchronization
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. It is assumed that one HMI screen will usually be used for primary CT controls,
generator controls, and critical instrumentation values. The second display shall
normally be used for process trending and/or plant performance information. The third
display shall be dedicated to alarms. Any one of the three HMI displays shall be
capable of displaying any of the HMI graphics, including alarms and trends.
Each combustion turbine DCS shall be configured with the following displays:
Control:
Master Unit Control
Inlet Air Heating / Evap Cooler Control
IGV and EGT Control
Fuel Select / Control
Start Check Permissives
LCI Starter / Turning Gear Control
Lube Oil Temp Control
Generator Breaker Control / Sync
Excitation Voltage / MVAR & PF Control
167
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Data Acquisition:
Wheelspace Temps
Bearing Metal / Drain Oil Temps
Vibration Monitoring
Exhaust Thermocouples
Hydrogen Seal Oil Monitoring
Generator RTD Temps
15.9. Alarms
A text-based alarm display shall be provided to alert the operator of all abnormal
process values or logic states. Alarms shall be prioritized by levels 1 through 4. Priority
1 alarms shall originate from all critical process or logic state values that either indicates
potential equipment damage, an impending trip condition or that a trip condition has
occurred. Priority 1 alarms shall display in red text. Priority 2 alarms shall indicate that
a serious condition exists, either with a process value or a logic state that could result in
equipment damage, equipment trip, runback, or load limiting. Priority 2 alarms shall
display in yellow text. Priority 3 alarms shall display unusual or abnormal process
values or logic states. These could be the result of equipment problems, abnormal
equipment or system line ups. Priority 3 alarms indicate the potential for a more serious
condition to occur is possible (for example, generator disconnects open). Priority 3
alarms shall display in blue text. Priority 4 alarms are shall be status state indications
that likely would not impact plant operation. Priority 4 alarms shall be displayed in white
text.
168
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Generator stator temperature (Ts) will be a first order time lag of a linear function of
stator amps:
The H2 outlet temperature will be a weighted average of H2 inlet temperature and stator
winding temperature:
To = (1-B)*Ta + B*Ts
At full load steady state (FLSS) with Ta=59° F, the model will produce Ts = 194° F and
To = 167° F.
The instructor can fail the generator cooling with a particular malfunction for each phase
of the generator. In this case the stator winding temperature will rise and outlet H2
temperature will be equal to it, as if there is no cooling H2 flow through the generator:
Ts = Ts + ∆t/lag1 * (C*amps)
To = Ts
169
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 5-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
mfGC101A CT “A” Generator #1 Phase A Temperature Multiplier 1 10 VR
mfGC101B CT “A” Generator #1 Phase B Temperature Multiplier 1 10 VR
mfGC101C CT “A” Generator #1 Phase C Temperature Multiplier 1 10 VR
mfGC201A CT “B” Generator #2 Phase A Temperature Multiplier 1 10 VR
mfGC201B CT “B” Generator #2 Phase B Temperature Multiplier 1 10 VR
mfGC201C CT “B” Generator #2 Phase C Temperature Multiplier 1 10 VR
The scope of simulation models will include the following systems / components:
170
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The scope of simulation models will include but not limited to the following systems /
components:
• generators
• voltage regulators
• exciters
• generator transformers
• generator speed matching and synchronization
• generator interlocks and associated equipment protections and trip logic
• high voltage breakers and disconnects
15.11.1. Switchyard
Modeling of the switchyard shall be limited to those components which directly affect the
simulated Combustion Turbine Generators (CTGs), Steam Turbine generator (STG)
and in-house electrical distribution system. Those components shall consist of three 18
kV / 230 kV step-up transformers, two station service transformers and five associated
sets of 230kV circuit breakers and motor operated disconnects.
The model will be simply based on two external parameters, namely grid voltage and
frequency, and the remote functions (RFs) to set the states of disconnects. The grid will
be assumed to be “infinite” with all three phases completely balanced. A malfunction for
loss of off-site power (LOSP), or loss of the grid, will also be provided. Each simulated
CTG and STG will therefore “see” infinite grid voltage and frequency if:
Back-feeding or connection to the grid of any simulated TG through the 4160V system
and back through the HV switchyard will not be simulated.
The effects of simulated malfunctions will be to trip the applicable 86 lockout relays
(LOR) and initiate appropriate trip and trouble alarms on the DCS. These malfunctions
will only occur if initiated by the instructor.
Remote Functions will be provided to reset all simulated 86 Lock Out Relays.
171
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Vd = V * sin δ
Vq = V * cos δ
where:
V = module of generator terminal voltage phasor
Vd = direct axis voltage
Vq = quadrature axis voltage
where:
E'q = quadrature axis fictitious transient voltage
E''d,E''q = d-q axes fictitious subtransient voltage
Eqe = induced voltage proportional to exciter wind voltage
xd, xd’, xd’’ = direct axis synchronous, transient and subtransient synchronous
reactance
xq, xq', xq'' = quadrature axis synchronous, transient and subtransient
synchronous reactance
T'd0 = direct axis transient time constant
T''d0, T''q0 = direct and quadrature axis subtransient time constant
x''=0.5*(x''d+x''q) = effective sub-transient reactance
Torque Equations:
Te = E''q*Iq + E''d*Id
P= ω*Te
172
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Mechanical Equations:
where:
ω = angular velocity in p.u.
ωnom = nominal frequency
Pt = turbine mechanical power
J = moment of inertia of generator's rotating system
s = absolute surge of motor
δ = angle of rotation
As described above, all of the main electrical parameters for each simulated GTG,
including voltage, frequency, current, real- and reactive-power and power factor shall be
calculated using first principles modeling, to interface with the appropriate DCS points.
All three phases will be assumed “balanced”, so there will be no differences in voltages
or currents between different phases.
Voltage regulator trip malfunctions will trip the AVRs to manual and drive the
appropriate DCS points. Operators will not be able to restore AVRs to “auto” until these
malfunctions are cleared by the instructor.
The logic for generator field breakers will be fully simulated including all manual and
automatic trip and close operations.
173
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
RFs and panel graphics) control and indication. Critical and non-critical alarm
conditions logic will be simulated to drive the appropriate DCS points.
RFs will be provided to control motor operated disconnects. Logic will prevent these
disconnects from operating when the applicable generator is on-line. The main purpose
of these RFs is to provide accurate indications on the DCS when the TGs are off-line.
The Electrical Network Model is based on solving the simultaneous equations for the
entire network. The simultaneous equations of a (N+1) node network can be written as:
where:
[Y] = complex quadratic [N*N] matrix of node admittance;
[V] = transposed complex vector of node voltage,
[I] = complex vector of injected current.
174
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Rt = real resistance
Xt = imaginary resistance
Kt = transformer coefficient presented in Electrical network model as :
Yt = (1/Z) /Kt
y0i = Yt*(1 - Kt)/ Kt* Kt
y0j = Yt*( Kt-1)/ Kt
where :
Yt = complex admittance of the transformer, connecting nodes i, j
y0i,y0j = complex shunts on nodes i, j
Similar equations can be written for other passive equipment of electrical system
models.
Sudden Pressure Malfunctions will be provided for the transformers. The effects will be
to trip the applicable protection relays and breakers and initiate appropriate trip and
trouble alarms on the DCS. These malfunctions will only occur if initiated by the
instructor.
Circuit breakers and associated logic will be simulated in sufficient detail to interface
with the simulated DCS and provide all necessary switching. These breakers will be
controlled from the DCS, and may also be tripped by the instructor using standard
component level malfunctions (CMFs) to bring in associated alarms. CMFs may also be
inserted by the instructor to fail these breakers from tripping or closing, to bring in
associated DCS alarms as applicable.
175
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Sudden Pressure Malfunctions will be provided for these transformers. The effects will
be to trip the applicable protection relays and breakers and initiate appropriate trip and
trouble alarms on the DCS. These malfunctions will only occur if initiated by the
instructor.
Circuit breakers and associated logic will be simulated in sufficient detail to interface
with the simulated DCS and provide all necessary switching between 480V load centers.
These breakers will be controlled from the DCS, and may also be tripped by the
instructor using standard component level malfunctions (CMFs) to bring in associated
alarms. CMFs may also be inserted by the instructor to fail these breakers from tripping
or closing, to bring in associated DCS alarms as applicable.
Remote Functions will be provided to locally operate 480V bus breakers that do not
have DCS control.
15.11.15. UPS
The Station UPS will be simulated logically with remote functions and malfunctions.
The instructor can connect or disconnect it with remote functions. The static switch can
be faulted to via malfunction, initiating appropriate DCS alarms.
176
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 6-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
mfEL001 LOSP – Loss of Off-site Power / Grid 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL002A CT Transformer A Sudden Pressure 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL002B CT Transformer B Sudden Pressure 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL002C ST Transformer Sudden Pressure 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL002D Station Service Transformer Sudden Pressure 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL002E Reserve Station Service Transformer Sudden Pressure 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL005A AVR trip to manual CT A 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL005B AVR trip to manual CT B 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL005C AVR trip to manual ST 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL007A CT Generator A Lockout (86G) 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL007B CT Generator B Lockout (86G) 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL007C ST Generator Lockout (86G) 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL011A CT Generator A Local Output Breaker Trip Switch 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL011B CT Generator B Local Output Breaker Trip Switch 0 1 DG 0 1
mfEL011C ST Generator Local Output Breaker Trip Switch 0 1 DG 0 1
Standard Component Level Malfunctions (CMFs) can be used to fail to trip, fail to close
or trip all DCS controlled breakers. These malfunctions will also trigger associated DCS
alarms, as appropriate.
Table 6-2
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
rfEL002A CT Transformer A LOR 86-MT Reset 0 1 DG NORM RESET
rfEL002B CT Transformer B LOR 86-MT Reset 0 1 DG NORM RESET
rfEL002C ST Transformer LOR 86-MT Reset 0 1 DG NORM RESET
rfEL002D SS Transformer LOR 86-MT Reset 0 1 DG NORM RESET
rfEL002E RS Transformer LOR 86-MT Reset 0 1 DG NORM RESET
rfEL014A CT Generator A Lockout Relay 86G Reset 0 1 DG NORM RESET
rfEL014B CT Generator B Lockout Relay 86G Reset 0 1 DG NORM RESET
rfEL014C ST Generator Lockout Relay 86G Reset 0 1 DG NORM RESET
rfEL019A-Z 480V Breaker Local Operation -1 1 DG OPEN NORM CLOSE
mfEL011A CT Generator A Local Output Breaker Trip Switch 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
mfEL011B CT Generator B Local Output Breaker Trip Switch 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
mfEL011C ST Generator Local Output Breaker Trip Switch 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
177
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
178
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
179
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Exhaust gas from the combustion turbine is directed to the HRSG by the inlet transition
duct. The “setting” provides CT exhaust gas containment ductwork, encasement of
various heat recovery module units, and the exhaust stack. The HRSG setting includes
ductwork transitions for connection with the CT outlet flange and HRSG module boxes.
In support of the coal gasification plant, the HRSG shall also be designed to supply an
adequate flow of heated feedwater to the syngas cooler equipment, and in return
receive a commensurate flow of high pressure steam which shall be used to augment
the HRSG’s production of high pressure steam. During times when the combustion
turbine is operating on natural gas, the syngas cooler feedwater supply and high
pressure steam returns shall be isolated.
The HRSG shall be designed with the following operating performance criteria for
operation on either syngas or natural gas, or any blended combination:
180
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
181
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
steam drum and, after passing through the low pressure steam superheater, enters the
low pressure steam system.
Acting much like the deaerator storage tank in a conventional steam plant, the LP drum
located on the top deck of the HRSG supplies a reserve of water with adequate net
positive suction head (NPSH) to the suction side of the main feedwater pumps. Each
feedwater pump actually provides two discharge streams of feedwater. High pressure
feedwater is produced at the pump’s main discharge, while intermediate pressure
feedwater is derived from an interstage extraction. High pressure feedwater is then
directed through the high pressure primary and secondary economizers before entering
the high pressure drum. Spray water for the main steam attemperators (sprays) is
supplied from the feedwater pump high pressure discharge, and cooling water for the
gasifier syngas cooler is obtained from the discharge of the high pressure primary
economizer. Intermediate pressure feedwater is directed through the intermediate
pressure feedwater economizer and then to the intermediate pressure drum. An
additional flow of intermediate pressure feedwater is also used to supply the spray
water for the reheat attemperators.
Saturated high pressure steam leaving the high pressure drum is transferred to the
primary and secondary main steam superheaters. The superheated steam then passes
through the main steam attemperator before entering the final main steam superheater.
The attemperators are necessary to ensure the final superheat and reheat temperatures
do not exceed 1,055 degrees F. Superheated steam exiting the final main steam
superheater is collected in the high pressure superheater outlet header where the high
pressure steam from both the “A” and “B” HRSG’s is mixed before being fed to the inlet
of the high pressure steam turbine.
182
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
In the case of IGCC applications, especially those using shift reactors, the change in
hydrogen content, and thus moisture content in the exhaust gas will vary tremendously
between syngas operation and natural gas operation of the combustion turbines. The
model shall consider these changes in exhaust gas enthalpy based on fuel composition
along with changes in flow and temperature, and realistically model the HRSG’s thermal
performance accordingly.
183
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Economizer
The HRSG model shall include economizers for the intermediate and high pressure
sections. The economizer’s function is to increase water temperature to an “approach”
temperature near the saturation temperature. The economizers in this HRSG design
are “once through” and “non-steaming” types. Flashing in the economizers is not
desirable at any time. The condensate pre-heater in the low pressure section is not
considered and economizer as it is not designed to heat the water to near saturation
conditions.
Evaporators
Evaporator sections are where the boiling process or steam generation occurs. Natural
circulation design high pressure, intermediate pressure, and low pressure evaporator
sections of the HRSG’s will be modeled.
A five-equation two-phase equilibrium model shall be used to model the steam and
water flow through the appropriate HRSG elements. All valves and non-return valves,
pumps and heat exchanger elements shall be modeled as discrete objects. The volume
of all water-side and steam-side elements shall be additionally modeled. Shrink and
swell effect on the drum levels will be modeled by evaluating the boiling regime present
in the associated evaporator relative to that element’s volume. The following equations
are solved for each node in the network to produce a consistent pressure-flow-energy
network solution:
Mass Conservation
M = M `+ ( ∑ m& in − ∑ m& out )∆t
Where: M - The mass of the fluid in the node
M ` - The mass of fluid in the node at the previous time step
m& - Mass flow
Conservation of momentum
m& = m& `+ ( ∆Pgrad + ∆Padm + ∆Ppump + ∆Pgrav )∆t S
l
Where: m& ` - Mass flow at previous time step
∆Pgrad - Overall pressure difference between two nodes
2
∆Padm - The hydraulic resistance: ∆Padm = ξ total m&
ρ with
ξ total = ξ valves + ξ friction
∆Ppump - Pump head added to flow path (dependent on mass flow, pump
characteristics and speed)
Pgrav - Static head due to node elevation differences
184
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Conservation of Energy
H = H `+ ( ∑ m& in hin + ∑ m& out hout + Qexternal )∆t
Where: H - Enthalpy of the node
h - Specific enthalpy
Qexternal - External heat flux to the node from sources like heat exchangers
Superheaters
The superheaters in the HRSG shall be modeled to absorb heat energy from the CT
exhaust gas and transfer it to the steam. The steam superheat energy level is
measured as an increase in steam temperature beyond the steam temperature
achieved in the evaporator section.
Blowdown piping and valves will be modeled to allow for continuous blowdown from the
HP and IP drums. Intermittent blowdown lines and manual valves will be modeled for all
evaporator elements.
Startup Bypasses
Each HRSG shall be equipped with steam bypasses for controlling temperatures and
flows through the various HRSG elements until sufficient flow is established through the
steam turbine. Although only the “A” train is illustrated, the “B” train steam bypasses
are identical.
Since the low pressure steam is saturated, the low pressure bypass system is used
primarily to control the pressure in the low pressure drum, and permits circulation
through the low pressure evaporator and condensate pre-heater circuits.
185
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The intermediate pressure steam bypass routes steam from the hot reheat line, then
reduces both the steam’s pressure and temperature through a regulating valve and
desuperheater, then dumps it into the condenser.
When placed in service, the high pressure steam bypass system provides steam flow
through all of the high pressure superheaters by removing steam from the high pressure
steam outlet, reducing its pressure and temperature through a regulating valve and a
desuperheater, and inserting it into the cold reheat line before it enters the HRSG. To
ensure the proper flow of steam on startup, the intermediate pressure steam bypass
must be placed in service first.
186
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
187
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Convective heat exchange calculations will be based on the following basic equation:
Q = K (T − T )
A H L W
Radiation heat exchange will be modeled based on the following basic principles:
Q R = Fe Fv σ A (TF − TS )
4 4
188
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
189
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 1-1
190
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
191
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The instructor will be able to operate remote switches and pushbuttons in the HRSG
using the Remote Functions as listed in Table 1-2.
Table 1-2
The condensate system also includes the make-up piping and valves connected to the
condensate storage tank. Leak flows will be modeled in the high-pressure steam
systems to allow the make-up system to function realistically. Two liquid ring vacuum
pumps provide air evacuation to the condenser and turbines, and provide continuous
removal of non-condensable gases during condenser operation.
The condensate and economizer recirculation pumps will be modeled using standard
commercially available pump curve data. The LP drum/deaerator level is controlled with
the condensate flow control valve at the inlet to each deaerator. The condensate make
up system will be modeled as a condensate tank with a limitless supply from the water
treatment plant. The make–up flow is controlled by the DCS using two parallel make-up
valves. Refer to Figure 1-5.
192
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
193
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Mass Conservation
M = M `+ ( ∑ m& in − ∑ m& out )∆t
Where: M - The mass of the fluid in the node
M ` - The mass of fluid in the node at the previous time step
m& - Mass flow
Conservation of momentum
m& = m& `+ ( ∆Pgrad + ∆Padm + ∆Ppump + ∆Pgrav )∆t S
l
Where: m` - Mass flow at previous time step
&
194
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Conservation of Energy
H = H `+ ( ∑ m& in hin + ∑ m& out hout + Qexternal )∆t
Where: H - Enthalpy of the node
h - Specific enthalpy
Qexternal - External heat flux to the node from sources like heat exchangers
Table 2-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
MfCD001 “A” Condensate Pump Motor Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfCD002 “A” Condensate Pump Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfCD003 “B” Condensate Pump Motor Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfCD004 “B” Condensate Pump Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfCD005 “A” Condensate Flow Transmitter Fail Hi/Lo 0 100 VR
MfCD006 “A” Condensate Flow Transmitter Noise 0 100 VR
MfCD007 “B” Condensate Flow Transmitter Fail Hi/Lo 0 100 VR
MfCD008 “B” Condensate Flow Transmitter Noise 0 100 VR
MfCD009 Gland Steam Condenser Tube Leak 0 1 VR
MfCD010 LP Economizer Recirc Pump Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfCD011 Condenser tube leak 0 100 VR
MFCD012 Condenser air leak 0 100 VR
MFCD013 Condenser tube sheet fouling 0 100 VR
MFCD014 “A” Vacuum Pump Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MFCD015 “A” Vacuum Pump Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MFCD016 “B” Vacuum Pump Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MFCD017 “B” Vacuum Pump Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
195
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 2-2
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
RfCD001 Gland steam condenser bypass valve 0 1 VR
RfCD002 Fuel plant condensate heaters bypass 0 1 VR
RfCD003 Exhaust hood spray isolation valve 0 1 VR
RfCD004 Condensate recirc. Bypass valve 0 1 VR
196
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The intermediate pressure feedwater control scheme operates in much the same way
as the high pressure feedwater controls. Inlet flow is measured at the outlet of the
intermediate pressure economizer, while outlet flow is measured at the inlet to the
intermediate pressure steam primary superheater. Like the high pressure system,
redundant level transmitters are located on the intermediate pressure drum. The
calculated feedwater demand signal is then sent to the intermediate pressure feedwater
flow control valve located at the inlet to the intermediate pressure drum.
197
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Variable speed drives on the feedwater pumps maintain a constant system pressure
regardless of varying feedwater demand. Refer to figure 3-2.
Table 3-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
MfFW001 “A” Feedwater Pump Motor Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfFW002 “A” Feedwater Pump Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfFW003 “B” Feedwater Pump Motor Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfFW004 “B” Feedwater Pump Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfFW005 “A” HP Feedwater Flow Transmitter Fail Hi/Lo 0 100 VR
MfFW006 “A” HP Feedwater Flow Transmitter Noise 0 100 VR
MfFW007 “A” HP Drum Level Transmitter #1 Fail Hi/Lo 0 100 VR
MfFW008 “A” HP Drum Level Transmitter #2 Fail Hi/Lo 0 100 VR
MfFW007 “B” HP Feedwater Flow Transmitter Fail Hi/Lo 0 100 VR
MfFW009 “B” HP Feedwater Flow Transmitter Noise 0 100 VR
MfFW010 “B” HP Drum Level Transmitter #1 Fail Hi/Lo 0 100 VR
MfFW011 “B” HP Drum Level Transmitter #2 Fail Hi/Lo 0 100 VR
198
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 3-2
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
RfFW001 “A” Feedwater to Syngas Clr Man Isolation Valve 0 1 DG OPEN CLOSE
RfFW002 “B” Feedwater to Syngas Clr Man Isolation Valve 0 1 DG OPEN CLOSE
RfFW003 “A” Feedwater to HP Spray Man Isolation Valve 0 1 DG OPEN CLOSE
RfFW004 “B” Feedwater to HP Spray Man Isolation Valve 0 1 DG OPEN CLOSE
RfFW005 “A” Feedwater to IP Spray Man Isolation Valve 0 1 DG OPEN CLOSE
RfFW006 “B” Feedwater to IP Spray Man Isolation Valve 0 1 DG OPEN CLOSE
199
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The simulation shall compute the water flow through the condenser and the water outlet
temperature. The inlet temperature of the water shall be an instructor controlled
variable.
Table 4-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
MfCW001 “1A” Circulating Water Pump Motor Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfCW002 “1A” Circulating Water Pump Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfCW003 “1B” Circulating Water Pump Motor Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfCW004 “1B” Circulating Water Pump Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
Table 4-2
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
RfCW001 Circulating Water Inlet Temperature (Deg F.) 33 100 VR
RfCW002 Vac. Pump Lube Oil Cooler #1 Isolation Valve 0 1 DG OPEN CLOSE
RfCW003 Vac. Pump Lube Oil Cooler #2 Isolation Valve 0 1 DG OPEN CLOSE
200
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
201
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 5-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
MfSW01 “1A” Service Water Pump Motor Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfSW02 “1B” Service Water Pump Motor Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfSW03 Stm Turb L.O. Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW04 Stm Turb Gen H2 Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW05 “1A” Cond Vac Pmp Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW06 “1B” Cond Vac Pmp Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW07 “A” Comb Turb L.O. Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW08 “B” Comb Turb L.O. Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW09 “A” Comb Turb Gen H2 Clr Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW010 “B” Comb Turb Gen H2 Clr Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW011 “A” Comb Turb Base Clr Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW012 “B” Comb Turb Base Clr Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW013 “A” BFP Seal Oil Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW014 “B” BFP Seal Oil Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW015 “A” BFP Lube Oil Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW016 “B” BFP Lube Oil Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW017 Cond Recirc Seal Oil Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW018 Cond Recirc Seal Oil Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW019 LCI Cooler Efficiency (0-100%) 0 100 VR
MfSW019 “1A” Svc Water Cooler Tube Sheet Fouling 0 100 VR
MfSW020 “1B” Svc Water Cooler Tube Sheet Fouling 0 100 VR
Table 5-2
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
RfSW001 Service Water Storage Tank Level (Inches) 0 60 VR
202
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Control loops and logic arrays shall be constructed using standard discrete process
control and logic objects. The use of “multi-function” or macro objects shall be avoided.
All objects shall be labeled with both their specific object name and their function. All
inputs, outputs, constants, and coefficients shall be appropriately labeled as to their
function. Additionally, output tags shall bear the name of the parent object in its naming
convention.
Control Loops:
High Pressure Drum Level Control
Intermediate Pressure Drum Level Control
Low Pressure Drum Level Control
Main Steam Temperature Control
Reheat Steam Temperature Control
Feedwater Pressure Control (Feed Pump Spd)
Condensate Pressure Control (Condensate Pump Spd)
Hotwell Level Control
High Pressure Steam Bypass Pressure/Flow Control
Intermediate Pressure Steam Bypass Pressure/Flow Control
Low Pressure Steam Bypass Pressure/Flow Control
Logic Arrays:
Condensate Pump Start Permissives
Feedwater Pump Start Permissives
SCR System Start Permissives
High Pressure Feedwater Control Three Element/Single Element Transfer
Intermediate Pressure Feedwater Control Three Element/Single Element Transfer
Condensate Control Three Element/Single Element Transfer
203
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The HMI Screens shall be in a mimic diagram format with pop-up faceplates for the
controls. On each train, it is assumed that one HMI screen will usually be used for
primary system controls, and critical instrumentation values. The second display shall
normally be used for process trending and/or plant performance information. The third
display shall be dedicated to alarms. Any one of the three HMI displays shall be
capable of displaying any of the HMI graphics, including alarms and trends.
The DCS for each heat recovery steam generator shall be configured with the following
displays:
16.6.3. Alarms
A text-based alarm display shall be provided to alert the operator of all abnormal
process values or logic states. Alarms shall be prioritized by levels 1 through 4. Priority
1 alarms shall originate from all critical process or logic state values that either indicates
potential equipment damage, an impending trip condition or that a trip condition has
occurred. Priority 1 alarms shall display in red text. Priority 2 alarms shall indicate that
a serious condition exists, either with a process value or a logic state that could result in
equipment damage, equipment trip, runback, or load limiting. Priority 2 alarms shall
display in yellow text. Priority 3 alarms shall display unusual or abnormal process
values or logic states. These could be the result of equipment problems, abnormal
equipment or system line ups. Priority 3 alarms indicate the potential for a more serious
condition to occur is possible. (For example: generator disconnects open.) Priority 3
alarms shall display in blue text. Priority 4 alarms are shall be status state indications
that likely would not impact plant operation. Priority 4 alarms shall be displayed in white
text.
204
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Turbine eccentricity measured as the amount of bow in the turbine rotor at turning
gear speed.
Vibration of rotating shafts of the turbine and generator monitored at each bearing
for the purposes of recording and protective tripping.
Rotor-shell expansion due to differential temperature response of the turbine rotor
and shells.
Turbine temperatures monitored in order to minimize metal stress caused by thermal
gradients. Temperatures are measured at the stop valve, steam chest, HP turbine
first stage inner shell, and the IP turbine reheat bowl.
Water induction into the steam path of the turbine is monitored in order to prevent
serious damage to the high-pressure shells, rotors, buckets and bearings.
The turbine system also includes the turning gear, which rotates the turbine-generator
rotor train at slow speed (3-5 rpm) after the turbine shutdown to prevent the rotor
bowing and bearings overheating. Another use of the turning gear is to assist steam
flow in rolling off the turbine at startup.
The turbine lubricating oil supply provides cleaned and purified oil at regulated pressure
and temperature for lubrication and cooling of the rotor bearings of the turbine,
generator and exciter. Primary closed-loop cooling directly supplies oil to the turbine-
generator bearings.
The turbine hydraulic power supply provides a source of high-pressure fluid to convert
the electrical signals produced in the turbine’s analog and logic control circuits into
power for operating the turbine’s control and stop valves.
205
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The bearing oil outlet temperatures are normally given by the metal temperature minus
9° F.
Turbine Vibrations
Vibrations are monitored at five journal bearings and can be affected by lubricating oil
temperature, critical speeds and instructor-set malfunction. Vibrations will be higher
also, if the turbine was started from standstill (instead of off the turning gear). All
vertical and horizontal proximitors and seismometers for the same bearing will act
proportionally. Thrust bearing proximitors will read values dependent on the turbine
load.
Vibration Monitor
If vibration at any bearing exceeds 5.00 mils, the vibration alarm signal is sent to the
DCS. If vibration at any bearing exceeds 10.0 mils, the vibration trip signal is sent to the
DCS. These signals are maintained until the Monitor receives a reset command from
the DCS. The instructor can fail the monitor with a particular malfunction. In this case
the vibration alarm and trip signals are inhibited and the Monitor status alarm is sent
The Turbine model is used to obtain positive shaft torque. Steam at high temperature
and pressure are fed to turbine inlet. Steam temperatures and pressures are reduced
at turbine outlet due to their transformation to turbine torque. In the model, the
characteristics of turbine are approximated by arc of ellipse.
206
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
The model will properly represent turbine startup, operation, and coast down. The main
turbine model will include main stop valves, control valves and combined reheat stop-
intercept valves. Valve configuration for each turbine type shall be modelled. Energy
storage in the rotating inertia of the turbine generator system will be present. Mass
storage in the reheater will be modelled. Turbine windage losses shall be simulated to
represent losses while not synchronized. Turning gear will be simply modelled. Turbine
metal masses will be simply modelled, axial and radial conduction will be modelled.
Inner metal temperatures will be based on heat transfer from incoming steam.
Turbine control is accomplished via stop valves and control valves. The turbine is rolled
on stop valves with control valves wide open. This control mode is referred to as full arc
mode. After the unit is tied online, turbine control is transferred from full arc mode to
partial arc mode. To accomplish partial arc mode, the control valves close to take
control and the stop valves go wide open.
OR
Warming is accomplished by rolling the turbine to 2100 rpm to 2250 rpm and soak.
Warming time starts when reheat steam temperature reaches 500 °F. Soak time to be
determined by HP first stage metal temperature and reheat inlet bowl temperature. The
turbine must be on turning gear for at least 1 hour prior to rolling to minimize
eccentricity.
The main turbine hood sprays and temperature will be a separate model based on an
algebraic energy solution combining turbine exit flow and energy, windage losses, gland
steam flows, and exhaust hood spray flows.
207
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
• The main turbine hood sprays and temperature will be a separate model based on
turbine backpressure and spray flow.
• Turbine-generator criticals (extracted from a table) shall be integrated to produce
worsening vibration at critical speeds for each appropriate section of the turbine.
• Turbine-generator vibration will be a function of oil temp and speed.
• Vibrations, eccentricity, wear, temperatures, and other turbine measurements will be
modeled to reflect the operating characteristics of a steam turbine typical of this
design
208
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 6-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
MfST01 Steam Turbine Trip Block 0 1 DG NORM RESET
MfST02 Steam Turbine Bearing # 1 High Vibration 0 100 VR
MfST03 Steam Turbine Bearing # 1 high Temperature 0 100 VR
MfST04 Steam Turbine Bearing # 2 High Vibration 0 100 VR
MfST05 Steam Turbine Bearing # 2 high Temperature 0 100 VR
MfST06 Steam Turbine Bearing # 3 High Vibration 0 100 VR
MfST07 Steam Turbine Bearing # 3 high Temperature 0 100 VR
MfST08 Steam Turbine Bearing # 4 High Vibration 0 100 VR
MfST09 Steam Turbine Bearing # 4 high Temperature 0 100 VR
MfST010 Steam Turbine Bearing # 5 High Vibration 0 100 VR
MfST011 Steam Turbine Bearing # 5 high Temperature 0 100 VR
MfST012 Steam Turbine Thrust Bearing 0 100 VR
Table 6-2
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
RfST01 Steam Turbine Load Limit Hand Wheel 0 110 VR
209
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Voltage regulator trip malfunctions will trip the AVRs to manual and drive the
appropriate DCS points. Operators will not be able to restore AVRs to “auto” until these
malfunctions are cleared by the instructor.
The logic for generator field breakers will be fully simulated including all manual and
automatic trip and close operations.
Table 7-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
MfGS01 ST Generator # 1 Bearing High Vibration 0 100 VR
MfGS02 ST Generator # 1 Bearing High Temperature 0 100 VR
MfGS03 ST Generator # 2 Bearing High Vibration 0 100 VR
MfGS04 ST Generator # 2 Bearing High Temperature 0 100 VR
MfGS05 STG Exciter Reject to Manual 0 1 DG NORM REJECT
MfGS06 STG Main Generator Breaker Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfGS07 STG Main Generator Breaker Trip Inhibit 0 1 DG NORM INHIBIT
MfGS08 STG Field Generator Breaker Trip 0 1 DG NORM TRIP
MfGS09 STG Field Generator Breaker Trip Inhibit 0 1 DG NORM INHIBIT
210
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 7-2
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
RfGS01 Turbine HEA Lockout Relay Reset 0 1 DG NORM RESET
Generator stator temperature (Ts) will be a first order time lag of a linear function of
stator amps:
The H2 outlet temperature will be a weighted average of H2 inlet temperature and stator
winding temperature:
To = (1-B)*Ta + B*Ts
At full load steady state (FLSS) with Ta=59° F, the model will produce Ts = 194° F and
To = 167° F.
The instructor can fail the generator cooling with a particular malfunction for each phase
of the generator. In this case the stator winding temperature will rise and outlet H2
temperature will be equal to it, as if there is no cooling H2 flow through the generator:
Ts = Ts + ∆t/lag1 * (C*amps)
To = Ts
211
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Table 8-1
Tag Description Lo Hi Type
MfGS01 ST Generator #1 Phase A Temperature Multiplier 1 10 VR
MfGS02 ST Generator #1 Phase B Temperature Multiplier 1 10 VR
MfGS03 ST Generator #1 Phase C Temperature Multiplier 1 10 VR
Control Loops:
Turbine Speed and Load Control
Generator Excitation
Full Arc / Partial Arc Transfer
Lube Oil Temperature Control
Logic Arrays:
Load Limiting and Runbacks
Generator Protection (Load, Voltage, and Reactive Limits)
Generator Breakers and Synchronization
212
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
16.11. Alarms
A text-based alarm display shall be provided to alert the operator of all abnormal
process values or logic states. Alarms shall be prioritized by levels 1 through 4. Priority
1 alarms shall originate from all critical process or logic state values that either indicates
potential equipment damage, an impending trip condition or that a trip condition has
occurred. Priority 1 alarms shall display in red text. Priority 2 alarms shall indicate that
a serious condition exists, either with a process value or a logic state that could result in
equipment damage, equipment trip, runback, or load limiting. Priority 2 alarms shall
display in yellow text. Priority 3 alarms shall display unusual or abnormal process
values or logic states. These could be the result of equipment problems, abnormal
equipment or system line ups. Priority 3 alarms indicate the potential for a more serious
condition to occur is possible. (For example: generator disconnects open.) Priority 3
alarms shall display in blue text. Priority 4 alarms are shall be status state indicators
that likely would not impact plant operation. Priority 4 alarms shall be displayed in white
text.
213
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
214
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
215
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
Condenser X
216
DOE/NETL IGCC Dynamic Simulator Research and Training Center IGCC Process Descriptions
217
Figure 15 HRSG Train “A” Arrangement
218