Table of Contents

Question 1
In managing the risks of your project is it advised that you as project manager adhere
to the tried and tested risk management principles. Identify these principles and
appraise them by applying them to the project.

Question 2
Appraise the theory of contingency plans, fall-back plans, and contingency reserves
and apply them to the project. A discussion of relevant examples to the project for
each will enhance your response.

Question 3
Risks can also be identified according to lifecycle phases of the project. In the early
life-cycle phases, the total project risk is high because of lack of information. In the
later phases, the financial risk is the greatest (Kloppenborg:2015). Use the lifecycle
phase risk identification to identify the risks for the project. A clear discussion of each
risk is required.

Question 4
The primary output of risk identification is the risk register. Compile a risk register
for the project ensuring at least TEN (10) project risks are recorded. Thereafter,
explain the contents of a risk register.

Question 5
Scenario analysis is the most commonly used technique for analysing risk. Use the
scenario analysis table to record at least TEN (10) identified risks for the project.
Thereafter, evaluate each risk and justify the impact assessment.
Question 1

Introduction
It is critical for me to successfully manage the risks connected with the project as the
main project manager for the bridge construction on the N3 motorway in
Johannesburg. Adhering to tried-and-true risk management concepts can assist
mitigate potential hazards and ensure the project's success. The following are
significant risk management principles to consider:

Identify and Assess hazards

Identifying and assessing potential hazards is the first stage in risk management. This
entails undertaking a thorough examination of the project's objectives, stakeholders,
and potential hazards. Environmental reasons, fiscal limits, safety concerns, and
community disruptions may all be dangers in the case of the N3 highway bridge
project.

Quantify and Prioritize Risks

Once risks have been identified, they must be quantified and prioritized based on their
potential impact and likelihood. This aids in allocating resources and focusing
attention on the most pressing threats. The risk of accidents caused by continued
pedestrian crossing efforts on the highway, for example, should be prioritized due to
the serious repercussions.

Create Risk Response Strategies

After identifying and prioritizing hazards, project managers should create risk
response strategies. Risk avoidance, risk mitigation, risk transfer, and risk acceptance
are examples of risk management strategies. The risk response strategy for the N3
highway bridge project could include designing the bridge to prohibit pedestrian
access to the highway and thereby reduce potential accidents.

Risks must be monitored and controlled

Risk management is an ongoing activity, and project managers must constantly

monitor and control risks throughout the project lifecycle. Regular risk assessments,
progress tracking, and communication with stakeholders are required to identify
developing risks and execute the necessary mitigation activities.

Involve Stakeholders
Engaging key stakeholders throughout the process is essential for effective risk
management. Consultation with local people, transportation officials, building
specialists, and other important stakeholders is part of this process. Engaging
stakeholders aids in getting insights, gathering input, and addressing their concerns.

Learn from Previous Projects

Project managers should learn from previous projects and implement what they've
learned into the risk management process. Reviewing previous experiences, both
successful and bad, can provide significant insights and aid in avoiding mistakes in
the future.

Stakeholder Communication: Effective communication with stakeholders is critical

for risk management success. Project managers should establish clear communication
channels to keep stakeholders updated on identified risks, mitigation solutions, and
progress. Regular updates and open communication help stakeholders manage
expectations and develop confidence.

Contingency Planning: Unexpected occurrences may occur despite good risk

assessment and mitigation efforts. Contingency plans should be developed by project
managers to address any hazards that may arise throughout the project. These plans
detail alternate approaches, resources, and actions that can be taken to mitigate the
impact of unforeseen risks and ensure project continuity.

Documentation and reporting of risks

Throughout the project, complete documentation of identified risks, their evaluations,
and risk management measures is required. Creating a risk register or log to record
each risk, its severity, likelihood, and appropriate response measures is part of this.
Risk reporting to project stakeholders and management on a regular basis keeps
everyone up to date on the status of risks and the effectiveness of mitigation
strategies.
Accountability and risk ownership
It is critical to assign clear ownership and accountability for addressing certain risks.
Each identified risk should have a person or team in charge of managing and
monitoring it. This guarantees that risks are actively handled and that clear
accountability is established in the event of any difficulties or incidents.

Regular Risk Assessments

Periodic risk evaluations are necessary throughout the project lifecycle to assess the
effectiveness of risk management techniques and identify any new or changing
hazards. Project managers can use regular reviews to assess the status of previously
identified risks, update risk response plans as needed, and identify any developing
risks that require immediate attention.

Conclusion
Potential risks can be foreseen and handled proactively by using these risk
management techniques to the N3 highway bridge project. This increases the
likelihood of a successful project delivery while reducing accidents and associated
fatalities.
Question 2

Introduction
Contingency plans, fall-back plans, and contingency reserves are critical components
of project management that assist in dealing with unanticipated events or hazards that
may develop throughout the course of a project. This essay will present a scientific
description of each idea, analyze their contributions to project management, and
provide pertinent instances of how they might be used to the construction of
Johannesburg's N3 highway bridge project.

Definition of Contingency Plans

A contingency plan is a predefined collection of activities, processes, or strategies
established to respond to anticipated risks or events that could have a substantial
impact on the project. It entails exploring alternate techniques to mitigating risks and
ensuring project continuation.

Risk contingency planning in a construction project begins with the project's size
before considering other aspects. This assists the project in establishing a baseline for
uncertainties inside the project and outlining both external and internal risks while
implementing suitable measures (Johnson, M, 2018). Fry (2013) stated that risk
contingency planning provides a useful structure for identifying, quantifying, and
prioritizing risks, thereby determining the project's schedule and assigning resources.
A lack of risk contingency planning can lead to project cost and time overruns. A
smart risk contingency plan, on the other hand, can be tailored based on prior similar
projects while taking the uniqueness of that particular project into account. Risk
contingency is defined as a sum of money included in a budget to indicate uncertainty
(Spacey, J. 2017). Bello & Odusami, K. T. (2009) highlighted that contingencies are
included to the development budget as an estimated fund, providing the client and
project team with the necessary flexibility to cover for uncertainties and risks that
may affect the completion of set project objectives. It provides as an additional
budget for the project owner to account for uncertainties that may result in cost
overruns.Most projects and operational operations encounter unexpected costs;
consequently, unexpected expenditures are to be expected. As a result, including a
risk contingency in a budget may be a standard practice in many projects (Tseng C. et
al. 2009).

Participation in Project Management

Contingency plans enable project managers to be proactive in risk management. They
enable quick and effective responses to unanticipated events, minimizing the negative
impact on project objectives, schedule, and money.

As an example, consider the N3 Highway Bridge Project.

A contingency plan for the N3 highway bridge project could include having alternate
building approaches in place to manage unforeseen obstacles, such as challenging soil
conditions encountered during foundation work. The plan may include alternate
procedures, equipment, or subcontractors that can be employed to offset any delays or
cost overruns caused by unanticipated ground conditions.

Fall-Back Plans

Define Fall-Back Plans

Fall-back plans are planned tactics or activities that are implemented when primary
plans or approaches are impractical or fail to produce the desired results. Fallback
plans serve as a backup or secondary option for mitigating risks and keeping the
project on track.

Participation in Project Management

Fall-back plans serve as a safety net, ensuring that project managers have options if
initial plans do not work as intended. They aid in project progress, reduce disruptions,
and raise the likelihood of successful project outcomes.

As an example, consider the N3 Highway Bridge Project.

In the case of unexpected delays or issues during the construction of the N3 highway
bridge, a contingency plan could include temporarily diverting traffic to an alternate
route to relieve congestion and assure ongoing traffic flow. This will help to avoid
major interruptions for passengers while also resolving any unanticipated concerns
that may develop during construction.
Contingency Reserves

Reserves for Unforeseen Circumstances

Definition
Contingency reserves are resources set aside, such as time or money, to address
known risks or uncertainties. They operate as a buffer or cushion, absorbing the
effects of prospective risks without jeopardizing project objectives.

Participation in Project Management

Contingency reserves increase project flexibility and allow project managers to
respond to unforeseen events more efficiently. They provide a financial or temporal
buffer that can be used when risks arise, assisting in the management of project
uncertainties and lowering the possibility of project failure.

For the N3 Highway Bridge Project, for example, a contingency reserve could be
established in the project budget to account for anticipated cost overruns owing to
unforeseen obstacles, such as changes in building material costs or unexpected ground
conditions. The reserve would give the project financial flexibility, allowing required
alterations to be made without jeopardizing the overall scope and quality of the
project.

Conclusion

Finally, backup plans, fall-back plans, and contingency reserves are essential project
management tools for dealing with unforeseen events and hazards. These approaches
can be applied to the N3 highway bridge project to assure project success and prevent
potential disruptions. Contingency plans' proactive approach, adaptability of fall-back
plans, and the financial cushion offered by contingency reserves all contribute to good
risk management and project resilience.
Question 3

Introduction

Risk management is such an important issue in project management that no project

manager should overlook it. As a result, throughout project planning, project
managers and teams should pay special attention to the identification and causes of
risks, risk classifications, and possible risk responses. The team should create a
document called a risk management plan that will guide them in risk management.All
project activities involve some level of risk, which are unknowns that could have a
positive or negative impact on the project. It is critical to distinguish between business
risks and project hazards. Business risks are more generic and concern the
organization, whereas project risks are unique to the project objectives.Risks are
unanticipated events that can harm or benefit a project's objectives. As a result, it is
the project team's responsibility to identify and isolate any potential risk factors
associated with the project.

Risk is an important notion that crosses several professions, necessitating careful

consideration in order to minimize its impact when it arises. The importance of
establishing an adequate risk plan in project management cannot be overstated.
However, a project is a short-term endeavour characterized by time, scope, and
resources used to create distinct results (PMI, 2019). As a result, corporations cannot
afford to invest large sums of money in a venture that is riddled with weaknesses.
Because projects have a set timetable, much should be done to guarantee that they
meet their objectives on time. However, risk is by far the most feared impediment to
project success. As a result, understanding the nature of risk and its successful
management in projects is critical for project personnel.

Eldash (2012) defines risk as "an unexpected event or condition that may have either
positive or negative effects on project objectives." The project objectives are the
things that project staff desire to accomplish while conducting the project, and they
serve as the yardstick for measuring project success. A risk is any incident that has the
potential to harm or benefit these objectives.Although risk and uncertainty are closely
related terminology that are sometimes used interchangeably in project management,
they differ. Risk is a circumstance in which the prospective outcomes of a decision
are known. In other words, risk actions can be predicted based on the likelihood and
magnitude of occurrence. Uncertainty, on the other hand, refers to a scenario in which
an individual is doubtful of future consequences. Decision makers are unable to
predict the outcome of such an incident, most likely due to insufficient or no
knowledge, making ambiguity a challenging condition to resolve. Risk, as opposed to
uncertainty, can be prepared for.

As a result, in project management, every risk is defined by two crucial factors: the
likelihood of the risk occurring and the effect/impact of the risk when it does occur.

Given the extent to which risk can jeopardize project objectives, it becomes critical
for project personnel to carefully plan for it. (Kloppenborg, 2014) defines risk
planning as a means of explaining how to manage risk activities in a project.
Understanding the project's objectives is critical to developing an effective risk
management strategy.

Given the extent to which risk can jeopardize project objectives, it becomes critical
for project personnel to carefully plan for it. (Kloppenborg, 2014) defines risk
planning as a means of explaining how to manage risk activities in a project.
Understanding the project's objectives is critical to developing an effective risk
management strategy. The project manager should take the lead in this process to
ensure that team members understand project objectives and the priorities of the
project's numerous stakeholders. Risk management is not a separate entity from the
project plan; rather, it is an intrinsic component of the project plan.

Risks in project management can be detected and addressed at various stages of the
project lifecycle. Early phases of a project can contain a higher level of uncertainty
and lack of information, resulting in distinct risks than later phases. As the project
proceeds, many forms of hazards become increasingly visible. We can identify and
explain the risks associated with each phase of the project lifecycle in the context of
the N3 highway bridge project.
The project is conceptualized and feasibility assessments are undertaken during the
commencement phase. During this stage, risks may include:

Risks of Feasibility
Uncertainty over the bridge's technical, environmental, and economic feasibility,
which may influence the decision to proceed with the project.

Funding Risks
Inadequate money or trouble obtaining financial resources for the project, which
could impede its start-up or advancement.

Phase of Planning

Defining project objectives, scope, schedule, and budget are all part of the planning
phase. During this stage, risks may include:

Scope Creep
The scope of the project grows beyond the initial concept, resulting in additional
expenses, delays, and potential disputes.

Risks of Resource Allocation

Inaccurate estimation of project resources, resulting in resource shortages or
overallocation, affecting project timeline and quality.
Phase of Execution

During the execution phase, project activities are carried out in accordance with the
stated plans. During this stage, risks may include:

Risks to Safety
Accidents or accidents during the construction process as a result of inadequate safety
measures, which can result in delays and legal consequences.

Quality Concerns
Poor craftsmanship or inadequate materials that degrade the bridge's quality, resulting
in future maintenance concerns or structural defects.

Phase of Monitoring and Control

Tracking project progress, finding deviations, and executing corrective steps are all
part of this phase. During this stage, risks may include:

Schedule Dangers
Unexpected delays, such as bad weather or labour strikes, have an impact on the
project's timeframe and completion date.

Communication Dangers
Ineffective communication among stakeholders, resulting in misconceptions,
decision-making delays, and potential conflicts.

Phase of Closure
Project handover, evaluation, and finalization are all part of the close phase. During
this stage, risks may include:

Transitional Risks
Difficulties in handing over the constructed bridge to the appropriate authorities or
stakeholders, including challenges with maintenance, operations, and ownership
transfer.
Legal Risks
Legal risks include legal challenges, claims, or litigation stemming from contractual
issues, environmental rules, or community concerns, all of which could have an
influence on project closure and reputation.

Conclusion

Project managers can build focused risk management methods to mitigate and solve
potential issues by analyzing the risks related to each step of the project lifecycle. To
reduce the impact of identified risks on the N3 highway bridge project, it is critical to
undertake extensive risk assessments, involve relevant stakeholders, and implement
appropriate risk response strategies.
Question 4

Risk Register
Risk ID Risk Likelihood Impact Risk Owner Risk Response
Description Strategy
R1 Accidents Medium High Construction Implement
during Manager stringent safety
construction protocols,
provide proper
safety training
to workers, and
conduct
regular
inspections.
R2 Budget High High Project Monitor
overruns Manager project costs
closely, track
expenditures
against the
budget, and
implement
strict financial
controls
R3 Delays in Medium High Project Establish a
obtaining Coordinator proactive
necessary approach to
permits and obtaining
approvals permits,
engage with
relevant
authorities
early, and
allocate
resources for
 expedited
processes.
R4 Unforeseen Medium High Geotechnical Conduct
ground Engineer thorough soil
conditions investigations,
employ
appropriate
foundation
design
techniques, and
have
contingency
plans in place
for potential
ground-related
issues.
R5 Design Medium Medium Design Maintain open
changes Team communication
requested with
by stakeholders,
stakeholders carefully
evaluate design
change
requests, and
assess their
impact on
project scope,
schedule, and
budget.
R6 Adverse Medium Medium Project Develop
weather Manager contingency
conditions plans for
weather-related
disruptions,
 closely
monitor
weather
forecasts, and
adjust the
project
schedule as
necessary
R7 Community Low Medium Stakeholder Conduct
opposition Engagement regular
and protests Manager community
consultations,
address
concerns
promptly, and
develop
effective
communication
strategies to
manage
community
expectations.
R8 Inadequate Medium High Project Implement a
contractor Manger rigorous
performance contractor
selection
process,
establish clear
performance
expectations in
contracts, and
conduct
regular
performance
 evaluations.
R9 Material Low Medium Procurement Maintain
shortages or Manager strong
delays relationships
with suppliers,
diversify
supply sources,
and have
backup options
in case of
material
shortages or
delays.
R10 Changes in Medium Medium Legal Stay updated
government Advisor with relevant
regulations regulations,
engage with
regulatory
bodies, and
adapt project
plans and
processes
accordingly.

Contents of a Risk Register

Risk ID: A unique identifier for each identified risk, which helps track and refer to the
risk throughout the project.

Risk Description: A clear and concise description of the risk, highlighting the
potential event or situation that may occur and impact the project.
Likelihood: An assessment of the probability or likelihood of the risk occurring, often
categorized as low, medium, or high.

Impact: An assessment of the potential consequences or impact on the project if the

risk eventuates, also categorized as low, medium, or high.

Risk Owner: The individual or team responsible for managing and mitigating the risk.
They are accountable for implementing appropriate risk response strategies.

Risk Response Strategy: The planned approach or actions to address the identified
risk, which includes specific measures or steps to mitigate or minimize its impact on
the project.

The risk register serves as a central repository for all identified risks and provides a
structured framework for documenting and managing risks throughout the project
lifecycle. It helps project managers and stakeholders to have a comprehensive
understanding of the project's potential risks and enables effective risk analysis,
planning, and response. The risk register is a dynamic document that is regularly
updated and reviewed as new risks emerge, existing risks change in likelihood or
impact, or risk response strategies evolve.

The risk register supports proactive risk management by promoting transparency,

accountability, and communication among project team members and stakeholders. It
aids in prioritizing risks, allocating resources, and implementing appropriate risk
response actions to minimize the negative consequences of potential risks on the
project's objectives, schedule, budget, and overall success.

By maintaining a well-structured risk register, project managers can ensure that risks
are effectively identified, assessed, and managed, leading to better decision-making,
improved project performance, and increased chances of project success. The risk
register serves as a valuable tool throughout the project lifecycle, providing a
centralized view of all identified risks and their corresponding risk response
strategies. It enables project managers to proactively monitor and mitigate risks,
minimizing their potential negative impact on project objectives.
The risk register plays a crucial role in risk communication and stakeholder
management. It helps project managers effectively communicate the identified risks to
stakeholders, allowing for a shared understanding of the project's potential challenges
and the strategies in place to address them. By being transparent about risks and
response plans, project managers can foster trust, gain stakeholder support, and
manage expectations effectively.

Furthermore, the risk register facilitates risk monitoring and tracking. As the project
progresses, the risk register is regularly updated with new risks, changes in the
likelihood or impact of existing risks, and the implementation of risk response
strategies. This allows project managers to monitor the effectiveness of the chosen
risk response actions, make necessary adjustments, and ensure that risks are
adequately managed throughout the project's lifecycle.

In addition to serving as a reference tool for the project team, the risk register also
supports organizational learning and future project improvement. By documenting the
risks encountered and the corresponding response strategies, project managers can
capture valuable lessons learned. These insights can inform future projects, helping
project managers anticipate similar risks, develop more effective risk response
strategies, and continuously improve the organization's risk management practices.

It is important to note that the risk register should not be treated as a static document.
It should be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the evolving nature of risks
throughout the project. Project managers should actively engage the project team and
stakeholders in the risk management process, encouraging them to contribute their
insights and perspectives on identified risks and potential response strategies. This
collaborative approach ensures a more comprehensive and accurate risk register,
enhancing the overall effectiveness of risk management efforts.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the risk register is a fundamental tool in project risk management. It

captures and documents identified risks, their likelihood and impact, ownership, and
the planned response strategies. By maintaining a well-structured risk register, project
managers can proactively manage risks, communicate effectively with stakeholders,
monitor and track risks, facilitate organizational learning, and ultimately increase the
project's chances of success.

Question 5

Scenario Analysis Table for the N3 Highway Bridge Project

Risk ID Scenario Likelihood Impact Justification

 Description
R1 Accidents Medium High Accidents are a
during common risk
construction in construction
result in projects, and if
injuries to they occur
workers during the N3
Highway
Bridge
construction,
they can lead
to severe
injuries or
even fatalities,
impacting the
project
timeline,
morale, and
potentially
resulting in
legal
consequences.
R2 Significant High High Budget
budget overruns can
overruns due occur due to
to unexpected unforeseen
costs circumstances
such as
material price
fluctuations,
labor
shortages, or
changes in
project
 requirements.
If significant
budget
overruns
occur, they can
strain financial
resources,
delay project
completion,
and lead to
potential
disputes with
stakeholders
R3 Delays in Medium High Delays in
obtaining obtaining
necessary permits and
permits and approvals can
approvals arise due to
bureaucratic
processes,
environmental
concerns, or
community
objections.
These delays
can result in
project
schedule
slippages,
increased
costs, and
reputational
damage to the
project and
 stakeholders
involved.
R4 Unforeseen Medium High Unforeseen
ground ground
conditions conditions,
require such as
additional unstable soil or
engineering unexpected
work rock
formations,
can necessitate
additional
engineering
work and
design
changes. These
changes can
lead to cost
overruns,
delays, and
potential
technical
challenges that
impact the
structural
integrity of the
bridge.
R5 Design Medium Medium Stakeholders
changes may request
requested by design changes
stakeholders to
impact project accommodate
timeline and their
costs preferences or
 address
specific
concerns.
These changes
can impact the
project
timeline and
costs, requiring
additional
design work,
approvals, and
potential
renegotiation
of contracts
with
contractors and
suppliers.
R6 Adverse Medium Medium Adverse
weather weather
conditions conditions,
cause such as heavy
construction rainfall or
delays extreme heat,
can hinder
construction
activities,
leading to
delays and
disruptions in
the project
schedule. This
can result in
additional
costs, resource
 allocation
challenges, and
potential risks
to worker
safety.
R7 Community Low Medium Community
opposition and opposition or
protests cause protests against
project the project can
interruptions lead to
disruptions,
site closures,
or legal
actions. These
interruptions
can delay
project
progress,
increase
project costs,
and damage
the reputation
of the project
and
stakeholders
involved.
R8 Inadequate Medium High Inadequate
contractor performance
performance by contractors,
affects project such as poor
quality workmanship
or failure to
meet quality
standards, can
 result in
compromised
project quality.
This can lead
to rework,
delays,
increased
costs, and
potential legal
disputes
between the
project owner
and
contractors.
R9 Material Low Medium Material
shortages or shortages or
delivery delays delivery delays
impact can arise due
construction to supply chain
progress disruptions,
market
fluctuations, or
logistical
challenges.
These
shortages or
delays can
impact
construction
progress,
causing
schedule
slippages,
additional
 costs, and
potential
compromises
in the quality
of materials
used.
R10 Changes in Medium Medium Changes in
government government
regulations regulations,
require project such as
modifications environmental
or safety
standards, may
require project
modifications
or additional
compliance
measures.
These
modifications
can impact
project costs,
schedule, and
design
requirements,
necessitating
coordination
with regulatory
bodies and
potential
rework.
Evaluation and Impact Justification: Each risk in the scenario analysis table is
evaluated based on its likelihood and impact. The likelihood assessment indicates the
probability of the risk event occurring, categorized as low, medium, or high. The
impact assessment reflects the potential consequences or severity of the risk event on
the project, also categorized as low, medium, or high.

The impact assessment is justified based on the specific characteristics and potential
outcomes of each risk in the context of the N3 Highway Bridge Project. Let's further
evaluate and justify the impact assessments for the identified risks:

R1 - Accidents during construction result in injuries to workers: This risk is assessed

as having a high impact because construction accidents can lead to severe injuries or
even fatalities. The potential consequences include disruptions to the project timeline,
decreased worker morale, increased insurance claims, and potential legal
consequences.

R2 - Significant budget overruns due to unexpected costs: The high impact

assessment is justified by considering the potential consequences of budget overruns,
including financial strain, delays in project completion, compromised quality, strained
stakeholder relationships, and disputes related to financial obligations.

R3 - Delays in obtaining necessary permits and approvals: The high impact

assessment is justified due to the potential for significant project schedule slippages,
increased costs resulting from prolonged project duration, potential conflicts with
stakeholders, and reputational damage to the project and its participants.

R4 - Unforeseen ground conditions require additional engineering work: The high

impact assessment is justified considering the potential consequences, such as
increased construction costs, project delays, technical challenges, and risks to the
structural integrity of the bridge.

R5 - Design changes requested by stakeholders impact project timeline and costs: The
medium impact assessment is justified by the potential effects of design changes on
the project timeline, budget, and coordination efforts. While design changes can
introduce additional costs and delays, they may not have as significant an impact as
other risks.

R6 - Adverse weather conditions cause construction delays: The medium impact

assessment reflects the potential disruptions to the project schedule, resource
allocation challenges, and increased costs associated with adverse weather conditions.
While delays can impact the project, they can be managed and mitigated to some
extent.

R7 - Community opposition and protests cause project interruptions: The medium

impact assessment considers the potential disruptions, delays, increased costs, and
reputational damage that can result from community opposition and protests. The
specific context of the project and the community's response determine the severity of
the impact.

R8 - Inadequate contractor performance affects project quality: The high impact

assessment is justified by the potential consequences, such as compromised project
quality, rework, delays, increased costs, and potential legal disputes. The impact on
project success and stakeholder satisfaction is significant.

R9 - Material shortages or delivery delays impact construction progress: The medium

impact assessment considers the potential impact on project progress, schedule delays,
and additional costs. While material shortages or delays can hinder construction
activities, alternative arrangements and supplier relationships can mitigate their
effects.

R10 - Changes in government regulations require project modifications: The medium

impact assessment reflects the potential consequences of changes in regulations,
including additional compliance measures, adjustments to project plans, potential
delays, and increased costs. The specific changes and their magnitude will determine
the severity of the impact.

Conclusion

The justification of impact assessments takes into account various factors, including
historical data, industry benchmarks, expert judgment, and the specific characteristics
of the N3 Highway Bridge Project. It is essential to regularly review and update the
impact assessments throughout the project as new information becomes available and
risks evolve. This allows project managers to maintain a comprehensive
understanding of the potential impacts and adapt risk response strategies accordingly.

References
Bello, W. A. and Odusami, K. T, (2009). Project Variables Influencing Contingency
on Construction Contract in Nigeria RICS COBRA Research Conference pp 204–14.

Eldash, K. (2012). PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT (COURSE NOTES).

ResearchGate.

Fry, B. (2013) 11 Contingency-Planning Tips

Hillson, D., & Murray-Webster, R. (2017). Understanding and managing risk attitude
(2nd ed.). Gower Publishing Ltd.

Johnson, M. (2018). What Is Cost Planning in the Construction World?

Kloppenborg, T. J. (2014). Contemporary Project Management, Third Edition.

Cengage Learning.

Kloppenborg, T. (2015). Contemporary Project Management (4th ed.). Cengage

Learning.

Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of

Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.

PMI. (2019). What is project management. USA: © 2019 Project Management

Institute, Inc.

Spacey, J. (2017). 4 Types of Cost Contingency.

Tseng C, Zhao, T. and Fu, C. C, (2009). Contingency estimation using a real options
approach Constr. Manag. Econ. 27 1073–87