Classroom Assessment Methods and Tools A Review
Classroom Assessment Methods and Tools A Review
net/publication/333378035
CITATIONS READS
3 20,049
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by B.V. Prasanthi on 13 December 2019.
1. Introduction
Analyzing students how they can understand and are able to give output in all the subjects is
Assessment. Assessment is very significant to track progress and to plan next steps. The various techniques
involved in assessment are the tools and instruments to collect the information about how the students can
demonstrate desired learning outcomes.
There are a number of methods used to evaluate student learning outcomes. Even though the
responses from student surveys are informative, when they are combined with test results of students they
will be more meaningful. Direct methods of assessment help us to analyze the students learning while
indirect methods help us to analyze those students to reflect on their learning. Some of the direct methods
from which we can assess are slip tests, seminars, presentations by students etc. and some of the indirect
methods for the assessment are surveys and interviews.
The course marks of students are a key basis of data about the achievement of the students. This
data is not sufficient for the measurement of student’s learning outcomes. There are many types of course
work that can be used for the assessing Student Learning Outcomes.
The rubrics are developed for instructors to use for grading and scoring the assessment. These
rubrics can be used by these programs
Course exams
Course assignments/projects
Essays, written exams, research papers, etc.
Below are the guidelines to follow when selecting assessment methods for a particular program:
To collect information that will answer the program’s questions
To use different methods to assess each student learning outcome
To include both indirect and direct assessment methods
To include both qualitative and quantitative methods
To choose various methods that allows the assessment of both strengths and weaknesses
In this paper we are giving a brief review of various assessment techniques used for analyzing students in
both direct and indirect methods. Hence these types of assessment give:
Different ways for monitoring and learning of the student’s progress
It also helps in understanding their student’s progress for providing report to parents
2. Types of Assessments
2.1 Diagnostic Assessment :
It is also called as Pre-Assessment. Before creating any instruction, it is necessary to know, to what
kind of students we are teaching. Assessing a student’s strengths, weaknesses, knowledge, and skills prior to
instruction/course is called as Diagnostic Assessment. It is used to identify current knowledge and/or
misconceptions about a topic. Based on this data ,we can plan our own instruction.
Eg: Pre and post tests, Self-Assessments, Interviews, Observations, Polling
94𝗑 IJRAR- International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews Research Paper
[VOLUME 6 I ISSUE 2 I APRIL – JUNE 2019] e ISSN 2348 –1269, Print ISSN 2349-5138
http://ijrar.com/ Cosmos Impact Factor 4.236
2.2 Formative Assessment:
It is used in first attempt of developing instruction. In this method, assessing a student’s
performance during instruction, and usually occurs at regular intervals throughout the instruction
process is done. It is used to monitor the student learning and to the provide feedback during the
course. It is used for finding a growth over a time.
Eg: Students Observations, Homework, Peer reviews, Informal presentations, Think/Pair/Share, Visual
Thinking Strategies, Quiz, Feedback
2.3 Summative Assessment
Measuring a student’s achievement at the end of instruction. It is to find mastery and
performance levels. Long term benefits can be determined by the students who attended the course or
test.
Eg: High Stake tests as Mid examinations, End University exams
2.4 Norm-Referenced Assessment
Comparison of a student’s performance against other group/norm of students.It is relative
grading.
Eg: SAT Test, IQ Test
2.5 Criterion-Referenced Assessment
It measures a student’s performance against a goal, specific objective, or predefined
performance standards. It checks what students are expected to know and be able to do at a specific
stage of their education is an absolute grading.
Eg: ACT Test, The Smarter Balanced Assessment TestI(SBAT)
2.6 Interim/Benchmark Assessment
Evaluating student performance at periodic intervals, frequently at the end of a grading period.
It can predict student performance on end-of-the-year summative assessments.
Eg: Attitude scales, Interest Inventories, Critical thinking tests/checklists
2.7 Confirmative assessment
It is an extension of summative assessment. When a instruction has been implemented in a
class room, it is necessary to take assessment that to check still is it a sucess after a year or not.
2.8 Ipsative assessment
It measures the performance of a student against his/her previous performances. This method is to check
the progress of student to find the improvement.
96𝗑 IJRAR- International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews Research Paper
[VOLUME 6 I ISSUE 2 I APRIL – JUNE 2019] e ISSN 2348 –1269, Print ISSN 2349-5138
http://ijrar.com/ Cosmos Impact Factor 4.236
References:
1. HAN, X., & GAO, M. (2011). Study on the Net-based Formative Assessment and Summative Assessment [J].
Journal of Hebei Radio & TV University, 5.
2. Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of
the literature. Computers & education, 57(4), 2333-2351.
3. Krause, J. M., O'Neil, K., & Dauenhauer, B. (2017). Plickers: A formative assessment tool for K–12 and PETE
professionals. Strategies, 30(3), 30-36.
4. Juanes, J. A., & Ruisoto, P. (2018, October). Technological Devices for Enhancing Active Learning. In
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
(pp. 392-396). ACM.
5. Awedh, M., Mueen, A., Zafar, B., & Manzoor, U. (2015). Using Socrative and Smartphones for the support of
collaborative learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.01276.
6. Jing, T. W., & Yue, W. S. (2016). Real-Time Assessment with Nearpod in the BYOD Classroom. In Assessment for
Learning Within and Beyond the Classroom (pp. 103-107). Springer, Singapore.
7. Mallon, M., & Bernsten, S. (2015). Collaborative learning technologies. Tips and Trends Winter 2015, ACRL
American Library Association
8. Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional
Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 49-52
9. Dizon, G. (2016). Quizlet in the EFL classroom: Enhancing academic vocabulary acquisition of Japanese
university students. Teaching English with Technology, 16(2), 40-56.
10. Dyer, K. The Ultimate List–65 Digital Tools and Apps to Support Formative Assessment Practices.
Research Paper IJRAR- International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews 97𝗑