Lesson 2

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

MODULE 1- LESSON 2:

THINK
lan Barbour, a scientist/theologian, argues that initially, technology was e viewed as
"liberation," then it was viewed as "liberation" but now increasingly it is viewed as
"power." Explain wea a Barbour's argument according to your own point of view.

Ian Barbour, a scientist and theologian, argues that people's views on technology have
changed over time. Initially, technology was seen as a way to free people and make life
easier. For example, electricity and cars brought convenience and improved living
conditions.

Later, technology was seen as a source of power. This means that technology not only gave
people freedom but also gave them control and influence over their lives and the world
around them. Think of how smartphones and the internet empower us to connect, learn,
and accomplish tasks more efficiently.

Barbour's argument highlights how our understanding of technology has evolved. It's not
just about what technology allows us to do, but also about the impact it has on society, the
environment, and even ethics. Today, as we face challenges like privacy concerns and
environmental impacts of technology, the idea of technology as power underscores its
significant role in shaping our lives and the world we live in.

LEARNING ACTIVITY
Research on two or more inventions that were based on were scientific principle/s.
Give the name of the inventor, the scientific principle involved and the scientist who
formulated the principle.

1. Electric Light Bulb:

Inventor: Thomas Edison


Scientific Principle Involved: Incandescent Light
Scientist Who Formulated the Principle: Joseph Swan
Explanation: Thomas Edison developed the electric light bulb, a device that produces light
by heating a filament to a high temperature until it glows. This principle is based on the
scientific discovery of incandescence, which was formulated by Joseph Swan. Swan and
Edison independently worked on developing practical electric light bulbs in the late 19th
century, with Edison's version becoming more widely adopted due to his improvements in
filament material and design.
MODULE 1- LESSON 2:

2. Telephone:

Inventor: Alexander Graham Bell


Scientific Principle Involved: Transmission of Sound Waves
Scientist Who Formulated the Principle: Hermann von Helmholtz

Explanation: Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone, which allows for the
transmission of sound over long distances. This invention is based on the scientific
understanding that sound can be transmitted as waves through a medium, such as air or a
wire. Hermann von Helmholtz, a German physicist and physician, contributed to the
understanding of sound wave transmission and the principles of acoustics, which laid the
foundation for Bell's invention of the telephone.

THINK
Explain any ONE of the purposes of science audience technology.

One main purpose of science and technology is to improve people's lives. Science helps us
understand the world, which allows us to solve problems and make life easier. For example,
scientists studied electricity, and then inventors used that knowledge to create useful
technologies like light bulbs and smartphones.

Another key purpose is to keep people healthy. Doctors and scientists study diseases and
the human body. They then use this scientific knowledge to develop medicines and
treatments that help sick people get better. Vaccines also use science to prevent people
from getting sick in the first place.

Science and technology also allow us to explore the world and universe. Telescopes and
satellites let us observe distant planets and galaxies, helping us learn more about our place
in the cosmos.

Overall, the main purposes of science and technology are to enhance our understanding,
solve problems, improve health, and expand our knowledge of the world and universe. By
working together, science and technology make life better for everyone.
MODULE 1- LESSON 2:

YOUR IDEA
Technology has enabled scientists to develop ever more destructive mo weapons
including conventional, nuclear and even germ - based. Do you believe that these are
necessary to maintain peace in the world? Or they have made the world even more
dangerous to live in? Explain your choice.

I believe that the development of destructive weapons has made the world more dangerous
to live in. Here's are the following why:
a. Risk of Accidental Use: The existence of these weapons increases the risk of
accidental use, whether through human error, technical malfunction, or sabotage.
This can lead to catastrophic consequences.
b. Tension and Fear: The presence of these weapons can create tension and fear
among nations, leading to increased military spending and a greater likelihood of
conflict.
c. Proliferation: The development and proliferation of these weapons can lead to more
countries acquiring them, increasing the risk of their use and the potential for global
catastrophe.
While it is true that some argue that these weapons are necessary for maintaining peace, I
believe that their existence and proliferation have actually made the world more unstable
and dangerous. The focus should be on reducing the number of these weapons and
working towards global disarmament and non-proliferation agreements.

In my opinion, the development of these weapons has not made the world safer, but rather
more vulnerable to catastrophic events. We should strive for a world where the use of force
is minimized and where diplomacy and cooperation are prioritized.

You might also like