Principles and Codes of ETHICS
Principles and Codes of ETHICS
Principles and Codes of ETHICS
codes of
ETHICS
Of professional conduct
The ADA Code is, in effect, a written expression of the obligations arising from the
implied contract between the dental profession and society.
The ADA Code has three main components:
2. The specialists shall be obliged when there is no referring dentist and upon a
completion of their treatment to inform patients when there is a need for further
dental care.
Advisory opinion
2.B.1. Second opinions
2.B.1. Second opinions
When a dentist gets a patient referred for a
second opinion on a diagnosis or treatment
plan, they should follow these ethical
guidelines:
● Patient's Best Interest First: The dentist
giving the second opinion shouldn't be
influenced by personal gain or any outside
factors. Their main focus should be on what's
best for the patient's dental health.
2.B.1. Second opinions
Objective Evaluation: The dentist should
carefully review the patient's situation and all
available information (like X-rays) without
any bias. Their recommendation should be
based solely on their professional judgment.
This ensures the patient receives a fair and
independent assessment, helping them
make informed decisions about their dental
care.
2.C. USE OF AUXILIARY PERSONNEL
Dentists shall be obliged to protect the health of their
patients by only assigning to qualified auxiliaries those
duties which can be legally delegated. Dentists shall
be further obliged to prescribe and supervise the
patient care provided by all auxiliary personnel
working under their direction.
2.C. USE OF AUXILIARY PERSONNEL
2.D. PERSONAL IMPAIRMENT
2.D. PERSONAL IMPAIRMENT
It is unethical for a dentist to practice while abusing controlled
substances, alcohol or other chemical agents which impair the ability
to practice. All dentists have an ethical obligation to urge chemically
impaired colleagues to seek treatment. Dentists with first-hand
knowledge that a colleague is practicing dentistry when so impaired
have an ethical responsibility to report such evidence to the
professional assistance committee of a dental society.
2.D. PERSONAL IMPAIRMENT
ADVISORY OPINION
2.D.1. ABILITY TO PRACTICE
2.D.1. ABILITY TO PRACTICE
A dentist who contracts any disease or becomes impaired in any way
that might endanger patients or dental staff shall, with consultation and
advice from a qualified physician or other authority, limit the activities
of practice to those areas that do not endanger patients or dental staff.
A dentist who has been advised to limit the activities of their practice
should monitor the aforementioned disease or impairment and make
additional limitations to the activities of the dentist’s practice, as
indicated.
2.D.1. ABILITY TO PRACTICE
Post exposure blood borne pathogen
All dentists, regardless of their blood borne pathogen status, have an ethical obligation to immediately
inform any patient who may have been exposed to blood or other potentially infectious material in the
dental office of the need for post exposure evaluation and follow-up and to immediately refer the patient to
a qualified health care practitioner who can provide post exposure services. The dentist’s ethical obligation
in the event of an exposure incident extends to providing information concerning the dentist’s own blood
borne pathogen status to the evaluating health care practitioner, if the dentist is the source individual, and
to submitting to testing that will assist in the evaluation of the patient. If a staff member or other third
person is the source individual, the dentist should encourage that person to cooperate as needed for the
patient’s evaluation.
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH PATIENTS.
Dentists should avoid interpersonal relationships that could
impair their professional judgment or risk the possibility of
exploiting the confidence placed in them by a patient
PATIENT ABANDONMENT.
Once a dentist has undertaken a course of
treatment, the dentist should not discontinue that
treatment without giving the patient adequate notice
and the opportunity to obtain the services of another
dentist. Care should be taken that the patient’s oral
health is not jeopardized in the process.
Principle III.
Beneficence (“do good”)
● Dentists are obliged to make reasonable arrangements for emergency care for both
regular and non-regular patients.
Objectives :
Ensure Fairness,Equality and inclusivity in the delivery of the dental care
and professional interactions within the dental community and society.
How justice can be conducted in dentistry in
general
by ensuring fair and equal treatment for all patients,
colleagues, and society.
This involves providing dental care without prejudice, making reasonable
arrangements for emergency care, and reporting instances of faulty treatment by
other dentists
Dentists should communicate truthfully with patients about their oral health status
and avoid unjustifiable criticism of other professionals
and in esthetics practice
.In esthetics practice within dentistry, justice can be upheld by offering aesthetic
treatments in a fair and unbiased manner
should provide accurate information to patients about esthetic procedures,
potential outcomes, and associated risks
It is essential to respect patient autonomy and preferences while ensuring that the
treatments offered are based on professional judgment and expertise
Overall, justice in dentistry, including esthetics practice, involves treating patients
with fairness, honesty, and respect, while upholding professional standards and
ethical guidelines outlined in documents like the ADA Code of Ethic
Ethical rule for dentist
Duties of dentist toward patient
• Insurance may not cover all needed treatments leading to disparities in the
level of care received by insured vs uninsured patients.
• Ensuring that patients fully understand their treatment options and give
informed consent can be challenging, especially when patients have
limited health literacy or language barriers. Dentists can address this by
using plain language, visual aids, and interpreter services to improve
communication with patients and their families.
Veracity
Based on current scientific data, the ADA has determined that the removal
of amalgam restorations from the non-allergic patient for the alleged purpose
of removing toxic substances from the body, when such treatment is performed
solely at the recommendation of the dentist, is improper and unethical. The
same principle of veracity applies to the dentist’s recommendation concerning
the removal of any dental restorative material.
. UNSUBSTANTIATED REPRESENTATIONS.
There are two basic types of referral services for dental care: not-for-profit and the
commercial.
e. A dentist is allowed to pay for any advertising permitted by the Code, but is
generally not permitted to make payments to another person or entity for the
referral of a patient for professional services
5.F. ADVERTISING.
5.F.5. INFECTIOUS DISEASE TEST RESULTS.
A dental practice should not seek to attract patients on the basis of partial truths which
create a false impression
an advertisement to the public of HIV negative test results, without conveying
additional information that will clarify the scientific significance of this fact contains a
misleading omission
5.F. ADVERTISING.
5.F.6. WEBSITES AND SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION.
Dentists may use services to increase the visibility of their web sites when consumers
perform searches for dentally-related content.
Dentists have an ethical obligation to ensure that their web sites, like their other
professional announcements, are truthful and do not present information in a manner
that is false and misleading in a material respect.
5.g. NAME OF PRACTICE
The use of a trade name or an assumed name that is false or misleading in any
material respect is unethical. Use of the name of a dentist no longer actively
associated with the practice may be continued for a period not to exceed one year
5.g. NAME OF PRACTICE
5.G.1. DENTIST LEAVING PRACTICE.
Dentists leaving a practice who authorize continued use of their names should receive
competent advice on the legal implications of this action.
With permission of a departing dentist, his or her name may be used for more than one year
if, after the one year grace period has expired, prominent notice is provided to the public that
the departing dentist has retired from the practice.
5.H: ANNOUNCEMENT OF SPECIALIZATION
AND LIMITATION OF PRACTICE.
● Provided that dentist meets the educational requirements required for
recognition as a specialist adopted by ADA.
● A dentist may ethically obligated to announce as a specialist to the public in
any of the dental specialties recognized by Certifying Boards.
● Dentists who choose to announce specialization should use “specialist in” / “is
limited to”.
● and shall devote a sufficient portion of their practice to the announced
specialty or specialties to maintain expertise in that specialty.
● Dentists should not use their eligibility to announce that they are or someone
on the team is a specialist when it is not true otherwise, it would be not ethical.
● GP should not announce themselves as specialists .
● If the dentist is certified in 2 specialities, then it is called a dual degreed dentist
and only at such case the dentist can announce himself/herself as an expert in 2
majors and legally autherized to practice them.
Is that always the case ?
Yes
The organization granting the credential grants certification or diplomate status
based on the following :
4. The announcement includes the name of the announced area of practice and the
name of the jurisdiction in which the dentist practices.
5. A disclaimer that despite the earned certificates, the clinician is a GP has to be
stated.
Nothing in this advisory opinion affects the right of a properly qualified dentist to
announce specialization in a recognized specialty area as long as the specialists shall
not announce their credentials in a manner that implies specialization in a
nonspecialty interest area.
5.I. GENERAL PRACTITIONER ANNOUNCEMENT
OF SERVICES.
● General dentists who wish to announce the services available in their practices
are permitted to announce the availability of those services so long as they
avoid any communications that express or imply specialization.
● General dentists shall also state that the services are being provided by
general dentists.
● GP should announce their credential interest following the previous conditions.
● The use of abbreviations to designate credentials shall be avoided when such
use would lead the reasonable person to believe that the designation
represents an academic degree, when such is not the case.