Short Notes
Short Notes
Answer:
a) Internally generated software should be treated according to provisions of NAS 38, Intangible
Assets. As per NAS 38, Intangible Assets an Intangible asset shall be recognized if, and only if,
It is probable that the expected future economic benefit that are attributable to the asset will
flow to the entity; and
The cost of the asset can be measured reliably
To assess whether as internally generated intangible asset meets the recognition criteria, an entity
classifies the generation of asset into a research phase and a development phase. Intangible asset arising
from research shall not be recognized and the expenditure on research phase shall be recognized as an
expenses when it is incurred.
An intangible asset arising from development shall be recognized if, and only if, an entitycan demonstrate
all of the following:
The technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that it will be available for
use or sale;
Its intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it;
Its ability to use of sale the intangible asset;
How the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits. Among other
things, the entity can demonstrate the existence of a market for the output of the intangible
asset or, if it is to be sued internally, the usefulness of such asset;
The availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the
development and to use or sale the software;
Its ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the software during its
development.
If the entity cannot distinguish the research phase from the development phase of an internal project to
create an intangible asset, or is not able to demonstrate the occurrence of development phase, the entity
charges the expenditure incurred on software to the statement of income.
b) In cases where there are material environmental impacts, they will normally expect to see a
statement of corporate commitment, policies and strategy, showing the importance attached to
such issues. There could well be a competitive advantage to be gained from being seen as a
leader in responsible environmental practices. The statement wouldusually deal with the overall
control over such issues, whether through a committee of the board or a senior manager with
practical experience of environmental issues in a corporate context.
Most users, particularly investors and lenders, will also be concerned to know whether there are any
material financial impacts, actual or potential, arising from environmental issues. Where this is the case,
discussion of environmental risks and uncertainties in the annual report, together with the related action
taken, may therefore be appropriate as wellas information about environmental performance. Depending
on the nature of the entity, there could be a call for information about matters such as site remediation,
disposal of waste, resource recycling or supply chain performance. In identifying the environmental
matters likely to be of particular concern to report users, some form of stakeholder engagement is
beneficial.
In reviewing a company’s annual report, the environmental matters attracting attention will tend to vary
according to its nature, size and geographical location but, where environmental matters are
significant, will generally fall within the following main areas:
Commitments, policies and strategies.
Environmental management
Principal environmental impacts.
Environmental performance – absolute and relative.
Fines, penalties or awards.
In appropriate cases, it is often helpful to users if reference is made to compliance with environment laws,
or The Natural Step, or certification to a particular standard or Project Acorn. This would normally help
to demonstrate the adoption of desirable environmental policies.
c) An embedded derivative is a component of a hybrid (combined) instrument that also includes a
non-derivative host contract with the effect that some of the cash flows of the combined
instrument vary in a way similar to a standalone derivative. An embedded derivative causes
some or all of the cash flows that otherwise would be required by the contract to be modified
according to a specified interest rate, financial instrument price, commodity price, foreign
exchange rate, index of prices or rates, credit rating or credit index, or other variable, provided
in the case of a nonfinancial variable that the variable is not specific to a party to the contract. A
derivative that is attached to a financial instrument but is contractually transferable
independently of that instrument, or has a different counterparty form that instrument, is not an
embedded derivative, but a separate financial instrument.
An embedded derivative should be separated from the host contract and accounted for as derivative if,
and only if;
(i) The economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not closely related
to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract.
(ii) A separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the
definition of a derivative; and
(iii) The hybrid instrument is not measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized
in the statement of profit and loss (i.e. a derivative that is embedded in a financial asset or
financial liability at fair value though profit or loss is not separated).
d) The economic entity principle states that the recorded activities of a business entityshould
be kept separate from the recorded activities of its owner(s) and any other business entities.
This means that you must maintain separate accounting records and bank accounts for each
entity, and not intermix with them the assets and liabilities of its owners or business partners.
Also, you must associate every business transaction with an entity.
A business entity can take a variety of forms, such as a sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or
government agency. The business entity that experiences the most trouble with the economic entity principle is
the sole proprietorship, since the owner routinely mixes business transactions with his own personal transactions.
It is customary to consider a commonly-owned group of business entities to be a single entity for the purposes
of creating consolidated financial statements for the group, so the principle could be considered to apply to the
entire group as though it were a single unit.
The economic entity principle is a particular concern when businesses are just being started, for that is when the
owners are most likely to commingle their funds with thoseof the business. A typical outcome is that a trained
accountant must be brought in after a business begins to grow, in order to sort through earlier transactions and
remove thosethat should be more appropriately linked to the owners.
e) It is necessary to consider the two parts of this issue separately
The claim made by the customer needs to be recognised as a liability in the financialstatements for the
year ended 31 Ashad, 2077.
NAS 37, Provisions, Contingent liabilities and Contingent Assets states that a provision
should be made when, at the reporting date:
i) An entity has a present obligation arising out of past event
ii) There is a probable outflow of economic benefits.
iii) A reasonable estimate can be made of the outflow.
All three of those conditions are satisfied here, and so a provision is appropriate.
The provision should be measured as the amount the entity would rationally pay to settlethe obligation of the
reporting date.
Where there is a range of possible outcomes, the individual most likely outcome is oftenthe most appropriate
measure to use.
In this case a provision of Rs. 1.6 millions seems appropriate, with corresponding chargeto profit or loss
The insurance claim against Dorjee’s supplier is a contingent asset.
NAS 37 states that contingent assets should not be recognised until their realization is virtually certain, but should
be disclosed where their realization is probable. This appears to be the situation here.
Therefore the contingent asset would be disclosed in the financial statement. Any credit to profit or loss arises
when the claim is settled.
4 c) Insurance contract is a "contract under which one party (the insurer) accepts significant insurance risk from
another party (the policyholder) by agreeing to compensate the policyholder if a specified uncertain future
event (the insured event) adversely affects the policyholder." The following are examples of insurance
contracts:
Insurance against theft or damage to property
Insurance against product liability, professional liability, civil liability or legal expenses
Life insurance and prepaid funeral expenses
Life-contingent annuities and pensions
Disability and medical cover
Surety bonds, fidelity bonds, performance bonds and bid bonds
Credit insurance that provides for specified payments to be made to reimburse the holder for a loss it
incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due
Product warranties (other than those issued directly by a manufacturer, dealer or retailer)
Title insurance
Travel assistance
Catastrophe bonds that provide for reduced payments of principal, interest or both if aspecified event
adversely affects the issuer of the bond
Insurance swaps and other contracts that require a payment based on changes in climatic, geological or
other physical variables that are specific to a party to the contract
Reinsurance contracts.
4 e) Many financial instruments have both features of debt and equity that this can lead to inconsistency of
reporting. It is not easy always to distinguish the debt and equity in an entity‘s statement of financial
position.
The key feature of debt is that the issuer is obliged to deliver either cash or another financial asset to the
holder. In contrast, equity is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the entity‘s assets after
deducting all of its liabilities. Thus, A financial instrument is an equity instrument only if the instrument
includes no contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity, and if the
instrument will or maybe settled in the issuer's own equity instruments.
For example,
a bond that requires the issuer to make interest payments and redeem the bond for cash is classified as debt.
ordinary shares, where all the payments are at the discretion of the issuer, are classified as equity of the
issuer.
preference shares required to be redeemed on a fixed date, or on the occurrence of an event that is certain
to occur, should be classified as debt.
preference shares required to be converted into a fixed number of ordinary shares on a fixed date, or on the
occurrence of an event that is certain to occur, should be classified as equity.
Where: MVA is market value added, V is the market value of the firm, including the value of the firm's equity
and debt, and K is the capital invested in the firm.
In corporate finance, Economic Value Added (EVA), is an estimate of a firm's economic profit – being the
value created in excess of the required return of the company's investors (being shareholders and debt holders).
Quite simply, EVA is the profit earned by the firm, less the cost of financing the firm's capital. The idea is that
value is created when the return on the firm's economic capital employed is greater than the cost of that capital.
EVA is net operating profit after taxes (or NOPAT) less a capital charge, the latter being the product of the cost
of capital and the economic capital.
The basic formula is: EVA = (r - c) * K = NOPAT - c * K
where r is the return on investment capital (ROIC); c is the weighted average of cost of capital (WACC); K is
the economic capital employed; NOPAT is the net operating profit after tax.
The firm's market value added is the discounted sum (present value) of all future expected economic value added:
MVA = Present Value of a series of EVA values.
c) An analysis conducted under unfavourable economic scenarios which is designed to determine whether a bank has
enough capital to withstand the impact of adverse developments. Stress tests can either be carried out internally by
banks as part of their own risk management, or by supervisory authorities as part of their regulatory oversight of the
banking sector. These tests are meant to detect weak spots in the banking system at an early stage, so that preventive
action can be taken by the banks and regulators.
Stress testing should be designed to provide information on the kinds of conditions under which strategies or
positions would be most vulnerable, and thus may be tailored to the risk characteristics of the bank. Possible
stress scenarios might include:
• abrupt changes in the general level of market rates;
• changes in the relationships among key market rates (i.e. basis risk);
• changes in the slope and the shape of the yield curve (i.e. yield curve risk);
• changes in the liquidity of key financial markets or changes in the volatility of market rates; or
• conditions under which key business assumptions and parameters break down.
d) A non-current asset (or disposal group) should be classified as held for sale if its carrying amount will be recovered
principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. A number of detailed criteria must be met:
a) The asset must be available for immediate sale in its present condition.
b) Its sale must be highly probable (i.e. significantly more likely than not). For the sale to be highly probable for
immediate sale in its present condition.
a) Management must be committed to plan to sell the asset.
b) There must be an active programme to locate a buyer.
c) The asset must be marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value.
d) The sale should be expected to take place within one year from the date of classification.
It is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
An asset can still be classified as held for sale, even if the sale has not actually taken place within one year.
However, the delay must have been caused by events or circumstances beyond the entity’s control and there
must be sufficient evidence that the entity is still committed to sell the asset or
disposal group. Otherwise the entity must cease to classify the asset as held for sale.
If an entity acquires an asset (a disposal group) (e.g. a subsidiary) exclusively with a view to its subsequent
disposal it can classify the asset as held for sale only if the sale is expected to take place within one year and it is
highly probable that all the other criteria will be met within a short time (normally three months).
An asset that is to be abandoned should not be classified as held for sale. This is because its carrying amount will
be recovered principally through continuing use. However, a disposal group to be abandoned may meet the
definition of a discontinued operation and therefore separate disclosure may be required.
e) The requirements of NAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment may, in part, offer a solution to the director’s concerns.
NAS 16 allows (but does not require) entities to revalue their property, plant and equipment to fair value; however,
it imposes conditions where an entity chooses to do this. First, where an item of property, plant and equipment is
revalued under the revaluation model of NAS 16, the whole class of assets to which it belongs must also be revalued.
This is to prevent what is known as ‘cherry picking’ where an entity might only wish to revalue items which have
increased in value and leave other items at their (depreciated) cost. Second, where an item of property, plant and
equipment has been revalued, its valuation (fair value) must be kept up-to-date. In practice, this means that, where
the carrying amount of the asset differs significantly from its fair value, a (new) revaluation should be carried out.
Even if there are no significant changes, assets should still be subject to a revaluation every three to five years.
A revaluation surplus (gain) should be credited to a revaluation surplus (reserve), via other comprehensive
income, whereas a revaluation deficit (loss) should be expensed immediately (assuming, in both cases, no
previous revaluation of the asset has taken place). A surplus on one asset cannot be used to offset a deficit on a
different asset (even in the same class of asset). Subsequent to a revaluation, the asset should be depreciated
based on its revalued amount (less any estimated residual value) over its estimated remaining useful life, which
should be reviewed annually irrespective of whether it has been revalued. An entity may choose to transfer
annually an amount of the revaluation surplus relating to a revalued asset to retained earnings corresponding to
the ‘excess’ depreciation caused by an upwards revaluation. Alternatively, it may transfer all of the relevant
surplus at the time of the asset’s disposal.
The effect of this, on company’s financial statements, is that its statement of financial position will be
strengthened by reflecting the fair value of its property, plant and equipment. However, the downside (from the
director’s perspective) is that the depreciation charge will actually increase (as it will be based on the higher fair
value) and profits will be lower than using the cost model. Although the director may not be happy with the
higher depreciation, it is conceptually correct. The director has misunderstood the purpose of depreciation; it is
not meant to reflect the change (increase in this case) in the value of an asset, but rather the cost of using up
part of the asset’s remaining life.
Answer
4 a) ‘Close out’ in securities trading
In case of purchases on behalf of clients, member brokers shall be a at liberty to close out the transactions by
selling the securities, in case the client fails to make the full payment to the member broker for the execution of the
contract within two days of contract note having been delivered for cash and seven days for specified shares or
before pay in day (as fixed by stock exchange for the concerned settlement period), whichever is earlier; unless
the client already has an equivalent credit with the member. The loss incurred in this regard, if any, will be met
from the margin money of that client. In case of sales on behalf of clients, member broker shall be at liberty to
close out the contract by effecting purchases if the client fails to deliver the securities sold with valid transfer
documents within two days of the contract note having been delivered or before delivery day (as fixed by Nepal
Stock Exchange for the concerned settlement period from time to time), whichever is earlier. Loss on the
transaction, if any, will be deductible from the margin money of that client.
4 c) It is one of the Economic value models used for measurement and valuation of Human assets. As per this
model, opportunity cost is the value of an employee in his alternative use. This opportunity cost is used as a
basis for estimating the value of Human resources. Opportunity cost value may be established by competitive
bidding within the firm so that in effect, Managers must bid for any scarce employee. A Human asset will
have a value only if it is a scarce resource, that is, when its employment in one division denies it to another
division. This method excludes employees of the type of which can be readily hired from outside the firm.
Also, it is in very rare cases that managers would like to bid for an employee.
4 d) Capital expenditures (CapEx) are investments made by a company in long-term assets, such as property,
plant, and equipment, with the expectation of generating future benefits. While capital expenditures are
typically represented by assets on a company's balance sheet, it is possible for some capital expenditures to
not be represented by assets.
This can happen when a company makes an expenditure that does not meet the criteria for capitalization as
an asset under accounting standards. For example, if a company spends money on research and development,
the costs associated with this expenditure may not be capitalized as an asset because the future benefits of
the research and development are uncertain.
In addition, some capital expenditures may be expensed immediately rather than being capitalized as an asset.
For example, if a company spends money on repairs and maintenance to an existing asset, the cost of these
expenditures may be expensed immediately rather than being capitalized as an improvement to the asset.
Furthermore, there may be situations where a company invests in a long-term asset that generates future
benefits, but these benefits are not expected to be sufficient to recover the full cost of the asset. In such cases,
the asset may be impaired and its carrying value reduced, resulting in a loss on the company's income
statement.
In summary, while capital expenditures are typically represented by assets on a company's balance sheet, there
are situations where capital expenditures may not be represented by assets, such as when the expenditures
do not meet the criteria for capitalization, are expensed immediately, or result in an impairment loss.
2. Attracts and retains employees. Employees tend to be happier working with companies thattake
care of them, and give them the opportunities to give back to, and volunteer in their local communities.
Such happy employees stay longer, and attract other people that are likeminded and want to work for
such organisation.
3. Increases understanding of risks and opportunities for sustainability projects. Similar to SWOT analysis
in marketing, a report, because it is so detailed and tied in with overall company goals.
4. Engages stakeholders.