IJAISE
IJAISE
In addition, the Q-Learning method is used to implement Differences are primarily based on the fact that outputs
bandwidth control for cloud providers. For one, they are concatenated rather than appended in DenseNet. As a
regularly adjust network infrastructure parameters to result, after applying a series of more complex functions,
match service level agreements with clients, while for the research performs a mapping to its values. DenseNet
another, they maximise network occupancy and, is the name given to this algorithm because the
consequently, income for the cloud provider. dependence block between variables gets quite thick.
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering IJISAE, 2024, 12(7s), 326–331 | 327
The final link in this chain is tightly linked to all the definitions, so the study will use them to examine the
links that came before it. results. Using the Python package, the study were able to
achieve this for each block by calculating the collection
S`
of selected features. The functions were used to compute
Dense Layers: the features in various preprocessing phases. All edges
It uses a modified activation, batch normalisation and having an RSSI value lower than-80 dBm, which is
convolution structure similar to ResNet. Convolution considered the Channel Assessment criterion for APs,
blocks with the same number of output channels make are first discarded from consideration. Edges between all
into a dense block. A convolution block input and output of the nearby APs that do not impact one another are thus
are combined in a forward propagation investigation, erased in this manner. The following features are then
though. calculated:
Adding too many transition layers will result in an overly Links with RSSI values greater than or equal to 80 dBi
complicated model, since each thick block increases the are counted as having this value. For each pair of APs
number of channels. Transition layers are utilised to keep that can see each other above the threshold, the
the model simple. symmetry should hold.
The study will reduce the input 224×96 because it is There was yet another preprocessing step required for the
utilising a deeper network here. remaining features because the edge weights had to seem
like a distance measure in those cases. In order to get the
3.2. Data Analytics and Classification distance between APs, i.e., the adjacency matrix entry,
RSSI readings from several office Wi-Fi networks were the study use Eq.(1) to convert the RSSI values (dBm).
used to generate the dataset. One-to-one computing is This distance is then used in Eq. (1) to get the distance
being implemented in Uruguay by this organisation. So, between APs.
one of its most important duties is to ensure that all wij=0.1(10−RSSIij) (1)
educational institutions in the country have access to Wi-
Fi internet access. Each Wi-Fi network AP conflict block can be interpreted
in many ways, and each feature picked has a possible
Most Wi-Fi networks are found in public primary and interpretation. All nodes have an influence on their
secondary offices, and it is crucial to keep this in mind. neighbors, which is reflected in all centrality
These educational institutions are housed in a wide range measurements, regardless of the disparities between
of buildings, from century-old structures with multiple them. This means that in a Wi-Fi network, an AP with a
levels. Each building is normally covered by 5 or 6 APs high centrality value is more likely to be located in an
on average, but about 20% of the buildings required area with higher levels of interference from its nearby
more than 10 APs, as shown in the graph. APs. When it comes time to deal with key concerns, such
The algorithm is used to manage radio resources by the as channel allocation and transmission power regulation,
WLCs. Radio transmissions of NDP packets use a single it important to know how many channels each AP needs
radio chain with the utmost power and lowest data rate to avoid interference.
permitted for the channel/band. NDP packets are sent As a result, most of the characteristics do not have a high
every 180 s by default on all channels. In the 2.4 GHz connection with each other, preventing the feature vector
range, the AP goes off-channel roughly every 16 seconds from being overly saturated with redundant data. The
to deliver an NDP packet; in the 5 GHz band, it goes off- final step in data exploration and feature analysis is PCA
channel every eight seconds. NDP data and RSSI for all decomposition, which digs deeper into the significance
received packets are forwarded to the WLC. The WLC of each characteristic found in our sample set.
takes five measurements each neighbour and averages
them over a period of 15 minutes. Because it is busy and 4. Results and Discussions
has less available spectrum than the 5 GHz band, the In this section, the study validate the proposed DenseNet
study will focus our attention on 2.4 GHz measurements. based on several network metrics that include cumulative
As a result, in order to build the conflict blocks, the study distribution function per access point traffic/entropy and
treat each AP as a node. As a result, each time stamp Jaccard similarity, caching resource utility and cache
corresponds to a single directed block for each office. gain ratio. The model is simulated in python simulator
This study relies on conflict blocks generated by Wi-Fi with eclipse IDE on a high end computing engine. The
network data, which are defined in terms of their proposed model is compared with conventional deep
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering IJISAE, 2024, 12(7s), 326–331 | 328
learning models including Deep Auto Encoders (DAE) and Residual Neural Network (ResNet).
1
DenseNet
0.9 DAE
ResNet
0.8
0.7
0.6
CDF
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Average Traffic Consumed per AP (kB)
1
ResNet
0.9
DenseNet
0.8 DAE
0.7
0.6
CDF
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Jaccard Similarity
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering IJISAE, 2024, 12(7s), 326–331 | 329
1
ResNet
0.9
DenseNet
DAE
0.8
0.7
CDF 0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
APs
1
ResNet
0.9 DenseNet
DAE
0.8
Average Gain Caching Ratio
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
File Size (KB)
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering IJISAE, 2024, 12(7s), 326–331 | 331