0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views29 pages

Arif Lecture 3

Uploaded by

fygaming.fy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views29 pages

Arif Lecture 3

Uploaded by

fygaming.fy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 29

AA284a

Advanced Rocket Propulsion

Lecture 3
Review of Thermodynamics and Chemistry

Prepared by
Arif Karabeyoglu

Mechanical Engineering
KOC University

Fall 2019

Stanford University
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Thermodynamics-Definitions
• System: A group of entities distinguished from its
surroundings
– Mass and energy transfer is allowed
– Change of volume is allowed
– Example: Human body
• Transfer quantities
– Heat (transfer to the system): δ Q
– Work (done by the system): δ W
– Mass transfer: δ M
• Definitions:
– Open System: Mass transfer allowed
– Closed System: Mass transfer not allowed
– Adiabatic System: Heat transfer is not allowed
Reference on Thermodynamics: I. Klotz and R. Rosenberg, “Chemical Thermodynamics”
Stanford University
2 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Thermodynamics-Definitions
• State of the system: Quantify the status of the system
– Extrinsic properties: E, H, G, M, N
– Intrinsic properties: T, P, z, K
– Extrinsic properties can be converted to intrinsic properties
• Example: e=E/M
• Change of State:
– Potential drives the system to change
– When the potential diminishes system reaches an equilibrium.
• Mission of Thermodynamics
– Governs the rules of change of state
– Move from state A to state B is feasible or not for specified heat
and mass transfer and work done
– Thermodynamics does not answer the questions how fast or what
is the exact form of the process.
Stanford University
3 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Thermodynamics-Laws
• Zeroth Law:
– If A is in equilibrium with C and B is in equilibrium with C, than A
and B must be in equilibrium.
• First Law:
– Conservation of energy
– Change in the internal energy must be equal to the heat added to
the system minus the work done by the system

d e = δ q −δ w
e : Internal Energy
– For simple materials only work is the pressure work. h : Enthalpy

δ w = P dv q : Heat Transfer
w : Work Done
– In terms of enthalpy P : Pr essure
d h = δ q + v dP v : Specific Volume
Stanford University
4 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Thermodynamics-Laws
• Second Law:
– Reversible/Irreversible processes
• Imagine a time dependent physical process governed by a set of
equations
• If these equations are invariant with regard to the sign of the time
variable the process is reversible, else irreversible
– There exists a system variable, entropy, with the following
definition for a single component system
δq δQ
d s= dS=
T T
• Explicit property
S : Entropy
– Second law of thermodynamics
s : Specific Entropy
d Suniverse ≥ 0 T : Temperature

Stanford University
5 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Thermodynamics-Laws
• Second Law:
– Or

d S system + d S surroundings ≥ 0
– For an isolated system
d Ssystem ≥ 0
– Entropy is a measure of “disorder” or lack of “information” on the
possible microstates
– Boltzmann’s Equation: S = k ln(N micro )
– All real processes are irreversible k : Boltzmann' s Cons.
• Third Law: N mic : Number of Micro States
– Planck’s Formulation: Value of entropy of a pure liquid or solid
approaches zero at 0 K
Stanford University
6 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Thermodynamics-Cycles
• Heat machines convert thermal energy into mechanical energy according to the
laws of thermodynamics.
• Many machines work in cycles. Working fluid returns to the original state that it
started.
• Carnot Cycle:
– Two constant temperature heat transfer processes and two isentropic
compression expansion processes
Q T η : Efficiency
– Carnot cycle efficiency: ηC = 1 − 1 = 1 − 1
• Bryton Cycle: Q2 T3
– Two constant pressure heat transfer processes and two isentropic
compression expansion processes
Δhcooling T T
– Bryton cycle efficiency: ηB = 1 − =1− 1 <1− 1
Δhheating T2 T3
• Cycle efficiency increases with increasing temperature ratio
• Carnot cycle is always the best efficiency heat machine operating
between two specified temperature extremes (T1 and T3).

Stanford University
7 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Thermodynamics-Carnot Cycle

Q2 Δhcooling T1
s3 − s2 = ηB = 1 − = 1−
T2 Δhheating T2

W Q2 − Q1 Q
• Carnot Cycle Efficiency ηC = = = 1− 1
Q2 Q2 Q2
Q Q
• Isothermal/Isentropic Branches: s1 − s4 = − 1 s3 − s2 = 2 s2 = s1 s3 = s4
T1 T2
• Combine:
Q2 Q1
=
T2 T1 ⇒ T T T
ηC = 1 − 1 = 1 − 1 = 1 − cold
T2 T3 Thot
Stanford University
8 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Thermodynamics - Bryton Cycle

Q1 h −h
• Bryton Cycle Efficiency ηB = 1− = 1− 4 1
Q2 h3 − h2
T4 − T1
• Perfect Gas: ηB = 1−
T3 − T2
T4 T1
• From Isentropic and Isobaric Branches: =
T3 T2

Stanford University
⇒ ηB = 1 −
T1
T2
but T3 = Thot > T2

9 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Thermodynamics – Cycle Comparison
• Work done by the fluid

W = ∫ P dv
• For the same extreme
temperatures the Carnot cycle is
more efficient than the Bryton cycle
• This conclusion is valid for all other
cycles.
• Thus Carnot cycle sets the upper
limit for the efficiency of a heat
engine operating at two set
temperatures
• Nonideal behavior is due to
– Non-isothermal heat transfer
– Non-isentropic expansion and
compression
Stanford University
10 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
State Equation
• State equation relates the state variables of a substance to
each other
• Gibb’s Phase Rule:
Number of Phases + Independent Intensive Properties
=
2 + Number of Components

( P + V = C +2 )
– Examples
• If P=1 and C=1, V=2 (One phase one component)
• If P=2 and C=1, V=1 (Two phase one component)
• If P=1 and C=2, V=3 (One phase two component)
Stanford University
11 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
State Equation
• State Equation for a one component system:

f (P, v, T ) = 0 P = P(v, T )

• Examples
– Ideal Gas Equation:
P=ρ RT

– Ideal Liquid Equation:

ρ = cons.

Stanford University
12 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Real Gases
• Ideal gas approximation fails at high pressures/low temperatures
– Volume of the gas molecules become non trivial
– Attraction/repulsion forces between molecules become significant
• Real gas. Compressibility factor (read z from charts)
P P Vm
z≡ = Vm : Molar Volume
ρ R T Ru T
• Equation of State (EOS) for real gases (Cubic equations)
– Van der Waals
⎛ a ⎞
⎜ P + 2 ⎟ (Vm − b ) = RuT
⎜ Vm ⎟⎠

– Redlich-Kwong EOS

⎛ a ⎞ 0.0866 R Tc PcVm 1
⎜ P + 0.5 ⎟ (Vm − b ) = RuT 0.42748 R 2Tc2.5 b= zc= =

⎝ (
T Vm Vm − b ) ⎟

a=
Pc Pc RuTc 3

– Peng-Robinson EOS RuT a(T )


P= −
Vm − b Vm (Vm + b) + b (Vm − b)
Stanford University
13 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
P-V-T Diagram of a Single Component Substance

Stanford University
14 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
P-h Diagram Molecular Oxygen

Stanford University
15 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Saturation Pressure and Density Plots for N2O

Stanford University
16 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Saturation Pressure vs Saturation Density for Popular Oxidizers

Stanford University
17 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Specific Heats
• Specific heats are defined as
c p : Specific Heat @ Cons. Pr essure
∂h ∂e cv : Specific Heat @ Cons. Volume
cp = cv =
∂T P ∂T v
γ : Ratio of Specific Heats
• For an ideal gas h = h(T ) e = e(T )
dh de cp
cp = cv = c p − cv = R γ=
dT dT cv

• For a calorically perfect gas both specific heats are constant

N +2 N
cp = R cv = R
2
• N is the internal 2
degrees of freedom (fully excited)

Stanford University
18 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Specific Heats
• Monotonic gas: N=3 (3 translational DoF)
• Diatomic gas
– Vibrational modes NOT excited: N=5 (+2 rotational DoF)
– Vibrational modes fully excited: N=7 (+2 vibrational DoF)
2
⎛ Θv ⎞ e Θv T
(cv )vib =R⎜ ⎟
– For intermediate temperatures

(
⎝ T ⎠ e Θv T − 1 )
2

Θv ≡ = Characteristic Temperature for Vibration ν = Frequency


k
– Data for diatomic molecules h : Planck' s Cons.

Characteristic Temperature N2, K O2, K


Rotational 2.9 2.1
Vibrational 3,390 2,270
Dissociation 113,000 59,500
Ionization 181,000 142,000
Stanford University
19 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Thermal Rocket – General Concept
• In a thermal rocket the propellant molecules are thermalized by addition of heat
in a chamber.
• This thermal energy (random motion of the molecules) is converted to the useful
directional velocity needed for thrust in the nozzle.

• The heat source varies


– Nuclear energy: Thermonuclear rockets
– Chemical bond energy: Chemical rockets
– Electric energy: Resistojets and Arcjets
– Thermal energy of the stored propellant: Cold gas thrusters
Stanford University
20 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Thermal Rocket – Thermodynamic Process
• Note that this is not really a cycle
since the propellant never returns to
its original state
• The velocity at the nozzle exit, ue,
can be estimated using the
conservation of energy along a
streamline
1
htc − he = ue2
2
ue = 2 (htc − he )
c p − cv = RT
• The maximum possible exit velocity
(or Isp) is obtained for infinite
expansion (he=0)
• For monatomic gas: ue = 2 htc
• For calorically perfect gas
RuTtc
ue = 2.21 2γ RuTtc
Mw ue =
γ −1 Mw
Stanford University
21 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Thermal Rocket – Velocities in Monatomic Gas
• Lets compare this maximum velocity to the other fundamental velocities that
can be defined in a monatomic gas
RuTtc Isentropic Speed of Sound : a = 1.29 RuTtc
Maximum Directional Velocity : ue = 2.21 s
Mw Mw

RT RuTtc
CharactristicVelocity : c* = 1.38 u tc Isothermal Speed of Sound : aT =
Mw Mw
RuTtc
Most Probable Molecular Speed (Maxwellian Distribution) : CMP = 1.41
Mw
RuTtc
Average Molecular Speed (Maxwellian Distribution) : C = 1.60
Mw
12 RuTtc
Square Averge Molecular Speed : ⎛⎜ C 2 ⎞⎟ = 1.72
⎝ ⎠ Mw
• Note that all of these speeds are of the same order (order of the average speed
of the molecules in the gas)
• Similar results can be produced for other gamma values

Stanford University
22 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Chemistry
• Atomic Model: Negatively charged electrons are orbiting around the positively
charged nucleus
• Schrodinger’s wave equation governs the size, number and shape of the orbitals

⎡ h2 2 Z e2 ⎤
⎢− 2 ∇ − ⎥Ψ = E Ψ
⎣ 8π me r ⎦
• Square norm of the wave function is a probability density function for the position
or momentum of the electron
• Eigenvalue problem – Only discrete levels of energy is possible

Stanford University
23 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Chemistry – Energy Level Diagrams
Atomic Structure (Quantum Mechanics)
• Principal quantum number: n=1, 2, 3 …
– General energy level of the shell
– n=1 (K), n=2 (L), n=3 (M),…
• Angular momentum quantum number: l=0, 1,
…(n-1) [Orbital angular momentum]
– Determines the shape of the orbitals
– l=0 (s), l=1 (p), l=2, (d), …
• Magnetic quantum number: ml: +l, +l-1,…0,
…-(l-1), l
– Determines the number of orbitals
• Electron Spin quantum number, ms
– Each electron has: s=½ or -½ [Intrinsic
angular momentum the electron]

Pauli Exclusion Principle:


“No two electrons in an atom may posses
identical sets of values of the four
quantum numbers n, l, ml,, ms “

Stanford University
24 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Chemistry
• Quantum Mechanics Predicts:
n : Pr incipal Quantum Number
– Shells, subshells, orbitals
• n=1: K shell (2 electrons)
– 1s subshell (1 orbital): electrons
• n=2: L shell (8 electrons)
– 2s subshell (1 orbital): 2 electrons
– 2p subshell (3 orbitals): 6 electrons
• n=3: M shell
– 3s subshell (1 orbital): 2 electrons
– 3p subshell (3 orbitals): 6 electrons
– 3d subshell: (5 orbitals): 10 electrons
• Argononic structures: Completely full shells (Noble elements: He,
Ne, Ar …), Octets
• Valance electrons: Electrons in the shell that is not completely
filled

Reference on Chemistry: Linus Pauling, “General Chemistry”

Stanford University
25 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Periodic Table of Elements

Stanford University
26 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Chemistry
• Elements in the same group have closely related physical and chemical
properties (same number of valance electrons)
• Elements in the periods have their valance electrons in the same shell
• Left side of the periodic table : Metals (Fuels)
– High electric and thermal conductivity, metallic luster, malleable,
ductile
• Right side of the periodic table : Nonmetals (Oxidizers)
• Metalloids in the middle: B, Si, Ge, As
• Chemical Bonds:
– Octet rule: Filled shell rule
• Share or gain electrons to fill their shells to the Argononic structures
– Covalent Bonds: Share pairs of electrons (H-C)
– Ionic Bonds: Take or give electrons (Li+Cl-)
• Electronegativity: Affinity of an atom to an electron
– The difference in electronegativity determines the covalent/ionic nature of the
bond (Upper right highly electronegative, lower left poorly electronegative)
• Strained bonds (C3H6, C2H2) and Resonance Structures (N2O)

Stanford University
27 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Chemistry – Electronegativity of the Elements
Electronegativity of the Elements (Pauling Scale)

(
3590 Z eff − 0.35 ) + 0.744
Allred-Rochow Scale Electronegativity Coefficients: χ = 2
rcov

Z eff : Effective Atomic Number rcov : Covelent Radius


Stanford University
28 Karabeyoglu
Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Review of Chemistry – Electronegativity and Bonding
Influence of Electronegativity on Chemical Bonding

Stanford University
29 Karabeyoglu

You might also like