Florida University Southeast, School of Business Valuation and Capital Investment

Business Valuation: Methodologies, Frameworks, and Applications

(Paper # 39)

May 2024
Disclaimer: This document is intended solely to assist participants of the FUSE School of
Business Valuation course in grasping the high-level summary of the roles and
responsibilities for the various Service Providers outline by the Ethiopian Capital Market
Authority. It is not meant to replace or reinterpret the actual directive.

Florida University Southeast School of Business Valuation and Investment 2

Business Valuation: Methodologies, Frameworks, and Applications

Introduction
Business valuation is a critical process that determines the economic value of a company
or its assets. It plays a crucial role in various corporate events, such as mergers and
acquisitions, strategic planning, financial reporting, and tax purposes. The importance of
accurate business valuation cannot be overstated, as it directly impacts decision-making
processes and the overall success of a company (Hitchner, 2017). This essay will explore
the different types of valuation methodologies, their frameworks, implementation, and
the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Types of Valuation Methodologies

There are three primary approaches to business valuation: the income approach, the
market approach, and the asset approach (Fernández, 2007). Each method has its own
framework and implementation process, and the choice of approach depends on
various factors, such as the purpose of the valuation, the availability of data, and the
nature of the business.

1. Income Approach
The income approach determines the value of a business based on its expected
future cash flows (Damodaran, 2012). This approach assumes that the value of a
company is equal to the present value of its future economic benefits. The two
most common methods under the income approach are the discounted cash flow
(DCF) method and the capitalization of earnings method.

Framework:
The DCF method involves estimating the future cash flows of a company and
discounting them back to the present value using an appropriate discount rate, which
reflects the risk associated with the cash flows (Koller et al., 2010). The capitalization of
earnings method, on the other hand, determines the value of a company by dividing its
expected future earnings by a capitalization rate.

Implementation:
To implement the income approach, valuators must first project the company's future
cash flows based on historical financial data, industry trends, and management's
expectations. They then determine the appropriate discount rate or capitalization rate
based on the company's risk profile and market conditions.

Pros:
Florida University Southeast School of Business Valuation and Investment 3
 • Considers the company's future growth potential and profitability
• Provides a detailed analysis of the company's financial performance
• Suitable for companies with stable and predictable cash flows

Cons:

• Relies heavily on assumptions and projections, which may be subjective

• Sensitive to changes in discount rates or capitalization rates
• May not fully capture the value of non-operating assets or intangible assets
2. Market Approach
The market approach determines the value of a business based on the prices paid
for similar companies in the market (Pratt & Niculita, 2007). This approach
assumes that the value of a company can be derived from the market prices of
comparable businesses. The two most common methods under the market
approach are the guideline public company method and the guideline
transaction method.

Framework:
The guideline public company method involves identifying publicly traded companies
that are similar to the subject company in terms of size, industry, and financial
performance. The valuator then calculates valuation multiples, such as price-to-earnings
or enterprise value-to-EBITDA, based on the market prices of the comparable
companies. These multiples are then applied to the subject company's financial metrics
to determine its value. The guideline transaction method follows a similar process but
uses the prices paid in recent transactions involving comparable companies.

Implementation:
To implement the market approach, valuators must first identify a set of comparable
companies or transactions. They then calculate the appropriate valuation multiples and
apply them to the subject company's financial metrics, making adjustments for
differences in size, growth, and risk.

Pros:

• Based on actual market data, reflecting the current market sentiment

• Relatively straightforward and easy to understand
• Suitable for companies with readily available comparable data

Cons:

Florida University Southeast School of Business Valuation and Investment 4

 • Relies on the availability and quality of comparable data
• May not fully capture the unique characteristics of the subject company
• Sensitive to market fluctuations and investor sentiment
3. Asset Approach
The asset approach determines the value of a business based on the fair market
value of its underlying assets, minus its liabilities (Hitchner, 2017). This approach
assumes that the value of a company is equal to the sum of its individual asset
values. The most common method under the asset approach is the adjusted net
asset value method.

Framework:
The adjusted net asset value method involves valuing each of the company's assets and
liabilities separately, using appropriate valuation techniques such as the cost approach
or the market approach. The valuator then aggregates the individual asset values and
subtracts the company's liabilities to arrive at the net asset value.

Implementation:
To implement the asset approach, valuators must first identify and categorize all of the
company's assets and liabilities. They then value each asset and liability using the most
appropriate valuation method, considering factors such as replacement costs, market
prices, and obsolescence.

Pros:

• Provides a clear and tangible value based on the company's underlying assets
• Suitable for asset-intensive businesses or holding companies
• Useful for valuing companies with significant intangible assets

Cons:

• Does not consider the company's future earning potential or growth prospects
• May not fully capture the value of intangible assets or goodwill
• Requires extensive due diligence and valuation of individual assets

Application of Valuation Methodologies

The application of these valuation methodologies can vary significantly based on the
context in which they are used. For instance, in the context of mergers and acquisitions,
the income approach is often preferred due to its focus on future profitability and cash
flows. Conversely, the asset approach might be more suitable for liquidations or

Florida University Southeast School of Business Valuation and Investment 5

scenarios where the company's tangible assets hold substantial value. The market
approach is frequently utilized in public markets, where data on comparable
transactions is readily available.

Combining Approaches
In practice, valuators often combine different approaches to arrive at a more
comprehensive valuation. This is known as the hybrid or weighted average approach. By
integrating various methodologies, valuators can mitigate the limitations of each
individual approach and achieve a balanced and well-rounded valuation. For example,
they might use the income approach to estimate the company's future cash flows and
then cross-check these estimates with market multiples derived from comparable
companies.

The IPO Process and the Importance of Valuation

An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is a significant event in a company's lifecycle, marking its
transition from a private entity to a publicly traded company. The valuation process
plays a crucial role in determining the success of an IPO.

The IPO Process

Preparation and Planning:

• Internal Review: The company conducts an internal review of its financials,

operations, and governance structures to ensure readiness for public scrutiny.
• Choosing Underwriters: Investment banks are selected to underwrite the IPO.
They help determine the offer price, buy the shares from the company, and sell
them to the public.

Regulatory Compliance:

• Filing with the SEC: The company files a registration statement (Form S-1) with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), providing detailed information
about its business, financials, and risks.
• SEC Review: The SEC reviews the registration statement, and the company may
need to provide additional information or make revisions.

Marketing and Roadshow:

• Roadshow: Company executives and underwriters present the company to

potential investors through a series of meetings and presentations.

Florida University Southeast School of Business Valuation and Investment 6

 • Price Determination: Based on investor feedback and market conditions, the
underwriters determine the final offer price and the number of shares to be
issued.

Going Public:

• Listing on an Exchange: The company's shares are listed on a stock exchange,

such as the NYSE or NASDAQ.
• Trading Begins: Once the shares start trading, the market determines the
company's value based on supply and demand dynamics.

Importance of Valuation in the IPO Process

Valuation is critical at several stages of the IPO process:

• Attracting Investors: A well-substantiated valuation helps attract institutional and

retail investors by demonstrating the company's growth potential and financial
health.
• Pricing the IPO: Accurate valuation ensures that the IPO is priced correctly.
Overpricing can lead to poor stock performance post-IPO, while underpricing can
result in lost capital for the company.
• Regulatory Approval: A transparent and thorough valuation process helps satisfy
regulatory requirements, ensuring that all disclosures are accurate and complete.
• Market Perception: The valuation sets the tone for how the market perceives the
company's future prospects. A credible valuation can build investor confidence
and contribute to a successful IPO launch.

Challenges and Considerations in Business Valuation

Business valuation is inherently complex and fraught with challenges. One major
challenge is the reliability and availability of data. Accurate and up-to-date financial
information is critical for any valuation, yet it can be difficult to obtain, especially for
privately held companies. Additionally, the choice of discount rates and growth
assumptions in the income approach can be highly subjective, leading to significant
variations.

References

Florida University Southeast School of Business Valuation and Investment 7

Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the
value of any asset (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Fernández, P. (2007). Company valuation methods. The most common errors in

valuations. IESE Business School, 1-27.

Hitchner, J. R. (2017). Financial valuation: Applications and models (4th ed.). John Wiley
& Sons.

Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2010). Valuation: Measuring and managing the
value of companies (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Pratt, S. P., & Niculita, A. V. (2007). Valuing a business: The analysis and appraisal of
closely held companies (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Florida University Southeast School of Business Valuation and Investment 8