A Systematic Literature Review: How Do We Support Students To Become Numerate?
A Systematic Literature Review: How Do We Support Students To Become Numerate?
Corresponding Author:
Ratu Ilma Indra Putri,
Mathematics Education, Universitas Sriwijaya, South Sumatra, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]
1. INTRODUCTION
Developing students’ ability to solve quantitative problems from daily life is seen increasingly as a
goal of mathematics education (O’Donoghue, 2002; Niss and Jablonka, 2014; Hoogland, 2016). Essential
skill that is needed to engage in situations in life that involve mathematical elements is called Numeracy
(Hains et al., 2019; OECD, 2022; Goos et al., 2020). Numeracy is as important as literacy in order to make
an individual to becoming an active and thoughtful citizen (Crowe, 2010; Geiger et al., 2015; Engel, 2019).
There are numerous terms that has been used to describe this interpretation, which are: numeracy,
quantitative literacy, mathematical literacy and many other more (Niss and Jablonka, 2014; Tout and Gal,
2015; Goos et al., 2020). However, the term that used in this article would be numeracy according to
Indonesian context of the definition of numeracy.
In general, many countries substitute numeracy skill to their education system or in other words
their curriculum (Liljedahl, 2015; Prince and Frith, 2020; Nortvedt and Wiese, 2020), including Indonesia
whom by 2019 reformed its education system by integrating it with literacy and numeracy competencies.
Furthermore, many prior studies found that numeracy closely related to skills that are needed in work life.
McClure and Sircar (2008) stated that recruiters look for numeracy because it is a primary skill that enables
professional success. It is in line with the definition of numeracy itself which is being useful in situations in
life, in this case, work-life. In addition, Crowe (2010) also stated that there is a strong relationship between
numeracy and citizenship.
Despite its importance, teaching numeracy can be challenging (Geiger et al., 2015; Hains et al.,
2019) and not an instant result of mathematics classroom learning (O’Donoghue, 2002), meanwhile being
numerate is every student’s right after completing the compulsory school (Goos et al., 2020). In order to
overcome the challenge, this article aims to explore the prior studies about supporting students to become
numerate through classroom or course.
2. METHOD
This article is using systematic literature review and was conducted in eight steps which are: 1)
formulating research problem; 2) developing and validating the review protocol; 3) searching the literature;
4) screening for inclusion; 5) assessing quality; 6) extracting data; 7) analysing and synthesizing data; and 8)
reporting the findings (Xiao and Watson, 2019).
3. RESULTS
3.1 Conceptualizing Numeracy
In general, numeracy can be described as an essential skill needed to engage in situations in life that
involve mathematical elements (Niss and Jablonka, 2014; Hains et al., 2019). Numeracy involves the ways in
which people deal with the demands of mathematical elements in adult life (Gal et al., 2020). Prior to this,
arisen from the demand of the characteristics of problem that adults may encounter (Bakker et al., 2011).
Even though in some literature, numeracy is described as numbers and computation performance, however it
is not the term this article used. The consequent of the transformation of knowledge, social structures, work
practices and technology are the transformation of how we see numeracy skill (Jablonka, 2015; Goos et al.,
2020).
Goos et al. (2014) have introduced a model of numeracy which contains the dimensions of
numeracy—the capabilities needed to meet the challenges of life in the 21st century. Figure 1 is the 21st
century numeracy model by Goos et al. (2014) which consist of contexts, mathematical knowledge,
dispositions, tools, and critical orientation as the dimensions.
The situations which demand numeracy, or in other words a context, are the critical things that should be
offered to students in order to support them to become informed and intelligent citizens (Steen, 2001; de
Lange, 2003), which is the intention of becoming numerate (Goos et al., 2020).
Related to the context of the problem in real-life situations, it is not the main goal of numeracy to
understand mathematical concepts better. Instead, to understand how to use mathematical ideas in struggles
to make the world better (Frankenstein, 2009).
Being numerate or in other words having numeracy competencies involves more than mastering
basic mathematics (Niss and Jablonka, 2014; Tout and Gal, 2015; Goos et al., 2020). Numeracy is viewed as
an important outcome of school (Gal et al., 2020) and being numerate is students’ right after completing the
compulsory school (Goos et al., 2020), this because numeracy is a foundational skill for every individual
(Niss and Jablonka, 2014).
Title of manuscript is short and clear, implies research results (First Author)
104
❒ ISSN: 2252-8822
Gal et al. (2020) characterizes numerate as an individual who knows some or a lot of mathematics
and statistics and able to apply that mathematics within a real-world context. Specific in health context,
Heilmann (2020) describe 4 levels of numeracy which are.
a. Basic, include identifying numbers and understanding quantitative data e.g., the required number of
pills and the time and date of medical appointments.
b. Computational, includes counting, computing and simple manipulations, e.g., calculating medical
fees.
c. Analytical, includes making sense of information and understanding proportions and percentage.,
e.g., understanding basic graphs and comparing benefits from different treatments.
d. Statistical, includes understanding statistical concepts and results, understanding probability
statements, critically analysing information, understanding and interpreting complex graphs,
understanding treatment consequences and making decisions based on risk comparison.
Aside from advanced in mathematics and making sense of on-mathematical context, being numerate
require problem-solving and critical judgement (Goos et al., 2020). Outside of mathematics classroom
situations, numeracy relates to the knowledge, skills, and dispositions or habits of mind related to
understanding and using certain aspect of statistics (Crowe, 2010). In addition, Crowe (2010) stated that the
examples of having numeracy competencies is about being able to perceive a data and being critical about it
in numerous contexts, for instance on economic context: buy a house, sell your house, take out a loan,
critically analyze a lending is predatory or not, or does the interest rate hike affect the daily life, on scientific
or medical context: using the medical information and make decisions about whether there is a risk to taking
a drug, and in civic life context understanding polling data and ask critical questions like the statistical
method of the poll.
Hoogland (2016) classify a way which we can use to observe numerate behavior of students. First
responding to information about mathematical ideas that may be represented in a range of ways.
Furthermore, the activation of a range of enabling knowledge, factors, and processes.
In their literature review, Aguilar and Zavaleta (2012) said that in order to produce numerate
student, more than a sufficient mathematical education is needed, or in other words to become critical citizen,
the learning requires the promulgation of democratic values and attitudes. However, numerous mathematics
teachers are not aware that they are both teaching mathematics and values. Changing the perception is one of
the biggest obstacles to overcome. Changing the perception of learning can be done by avoid instruction like
“solve the equation…”, “find the length of…”, “calculate the value of…” because it would dissociate
students to be critical, meanwhile mathematics teaching should include activities that will encourage students
to use mathematics as a thinking tool.
In his study, Hoogland (2016) describe the process of the classroom, first serve real problem as the
starting point, continued by stipulate mathematising: formulating the mathematical problem, modelling, and
problem solving, then calculate takes place: employing, mathematical analysis, and working mathematically,
last is interpreting the outcome of the mathematical activity and make sense of it in the perspective of the
original problem: interpret, evaluate, communicate, validate, and expose.
In addition, several areas where differences can be made in enhancing numeracy learning through
mathematics class are: 1) changing the design of learning environments; 2) changing the tasks; 3) self-
regulations training and cooperative learning with peers; 4) process-oriented feedback; 5) teachers’ emotions
and enthusiasm for teaching mathematics, and 6) contextual factors such as parental support and the
composition of peer groups (Liu, 2020).
Moreover, Crowe (2010) gave the example of how numeracy can be embedded to social studies
classroom. Teachers can dispose students to numerous articles or information around them which include
numeric data, percentage, average, or graphs and charts. Not only that, to dispose students to ask deeper
questions about the data or the readings, teachers can start by pose critical questions such as: 1) what do the
numbers in this piece mean? 2) how could they be represented differently? 3) where are the places that
misunderstanding can take place as a result of the author’s use of numbers? 4) what is missing? 5) is there
more data that would make this easier to understand? And many other questions. These questions would
guide students toward making connections between data and decision-making about an issue.
Besides that, in the context of mathematics classroom, the art of embedding numeracy can be done
by seeing the situations (or contexts) as having certain distances in relation to students. The distance can be
described as the closest situations to students, here is the list of the distance from the shortest to the furthest:
students’ personal life—school (educational) life—work (occupational) and leisure—local community and
society—scientific situations. It might be possible to enlarge the distance domain as the age of students
increase but not in a strict way (de Lange, 2003). This is in line with the important implication of Piaget’s
theory which is adaptation of instruction to the students’ developmental level (Lefa, 2014).
Talking about numeracy task, the characteristics of numeracy problem are: 1) situated in the real
world; 2) involves process of reading, interpreting, solving, and communicating in a mathematical manner
(Gal et al., 2020). In addition, mathematical concepts should be learned through solving problems in
appropriate settings (de Lange, 2003).
Numeracy skill is closely related to mathematical elements that happens in real-life setting which
occur in broad context, integrated with another knowledge of the world (Frankenstein, 2009). Hence, to be
effectively developing students’ numeracy capabilities there is a need to be proficient at recognising the
numeracy demands in real-life setting (Goos et al, 2020). Furthermore, Goos et al. (2020) gave some
examples about everyday situations that demand numeracy, as seen in Figure 2.
Numeracy is an essential skill to have in this century (Hains et al., 2019; Crowe, 2010; Goos et al.,
2020). It is because it promotes individual competencies to solve a problem which include mathematical
elements (Goos et al., 2020). However, taking lots of mathematics class does not imply that students would
Title of manuscript is short and clear, implies research results (First Author)
106
❒ ISSN: 2252-8822
have better numeracy skill or become numerate (Crowe, 2010). It is because numeracy involves more than
mastering the basic mathematics (Goos et al., 2020). Table 1 provides abilities included as numeracy.
Categories Ability
Basic mathematics Understanding the concept of mathematics topics;
including: identifying numbers, counting,
computing, manipulating, understanding
proportions and percentage, understanding basic
graphs, and understanding quantitative data.
Context-related Including: perceiving a data, and making sense of
information
Problem-solving Including: being critical about the data or the
information, applying the correct mathematics in
the appropriate context, making decisions, and
interpreting the results.
In order to prepare students to become numerate, teachers can serve student to numeracy learning.
Numeracy learning does not mean it only can be done by mathematics teachers in mathematics classroom, it
also can be embedded in numerous subject (Crowe, 2010; Hains et al., 2019). The core point of numeracy
learning is the understanding of the teachers about the implications of mathematics in the real situations.
Furthermore, Table 2 provides the activities which can be used to implement numeracy learning.
In addition, since the use of everyday situations is crucial to numeracy learning, there is one learning
approach which is expectantly able to support numeracy learning. Realistic Mathematics Education (RME),
in one of its principle, reality principle which attached to the goal of mathematics education of students’
ability to apply mathematics in solving “real-life” problems (Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and Drijvers, 2020).
This principle is in line with the aim of numeracy learning.
One important thing about numeracy is the use of mathematics elements in numerous of contexts,
which means the use of context when serving numeracy learning is crucial (Gal et al., 2020). With that
understanding, teacher can prepare the problem or readings or public information as the learning material to
be disposed to students (de Lange, 2003; Crowe, 2010; Liu, 2020; and Gat et al., 2020). Furthermore, this
learning material can be discussed in depth to deepen students understanding and dispose them to be more
critical. Crowe (2010) explain that, teacher can exemplify by questioning everything and students will,
unconsciously, start to critically questioning everything as well. Finally, combining all those aspects can
provide an opportunity for students being numerate.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
There is no conflict of interest
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank to Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology Republic Indonesia
through HIBAH PMDSU 2022-2024 main contract 142/E5/PG.02.00PT/2022 with derivative contract no.
0146.04/UN9.3.1/PL/2022.
REFERENCES
Aguilar, M. S., & Zavaleta, J. G. M. (2012). On the links between mathematics education and democracy: A literature
review. pythagoras, 33(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v33i2.164
Aguilar, M. S., & Castaneda, A. (2021). What mathematical competencies does a citizen needs to interpret Mexico’s
official information about the COVID-19 pandemic?. Educational studies in mathematics, 108(1), 227-248.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10082-9
Bakker, A., Wijers, M., Jonker, V., & Akkerman, S. (2011). The use, nature and purposes of measurement in
intermediate-level occupations. ZDM, 43(5), 737-746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0328-3
Crowe, A. R. (2010). “What's math got to do with it?”: Numeracy and social studies education. The Social Studies,
101(3), 105-110. http://doi.org/10.1080/00377990903493846
De Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges, 80,
75-89.
Engel, J. (2019). Statistical literacy and society: What is civic statistics? In J. M. Contreras, M. M. Gea, M. M. López-
Martín, & E. Molina-Portillo (Eds.), Actas del tercer congreso internacional virtual de educación estadística [Proceedings
of the third international virtual congress on statistics education] (pp. 1–17). University of Granada.
https://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/handle/10481/55027/engel.pdf
Frankenstein, M. (2009). Developing a criticalmathematical numeracy through real real-life word problems. In Words
and worlds (pp. 111-130). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909383_008
Gal, I., Grotlüschen, A., Tout, D., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Numeracy, adult education, and vulnerable adults: a critical view
of a neglected field. Zdm, 52(3), 377-394. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01155-9
Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state
of the field. ZDM, 47(4), 531-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1
Goos, M., Geiger, V., Dole, S., Forgasz, H., & Bennison, A. (2020). Numeracy across the curriculum: Research-based
strategies for enhancing teaching and learning. Routledge.
Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2014). Transforming professional practice in numeracy teaching. In Transforming
Mathematics Instruction (pp. 81-102). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_6
Hains, D., Intindola, M., Lepisto, D., & Wagner, B. (2019). Scrimmage! Teaching quantitative literacy through a
multidimensional simulation. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 119-129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.01.002
Heilmann, L. (2020). Health and numeracy: The role of numeracy skills in health satisfaction and health-related
behaviour. ZDM, 52(3), 407-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01106-z
Hoogland, C. P. (2016). Images of numeracy: investigating the effects of visual representations of problem situations in
contextual mathematical problem solving. [Phd Thesis 2 (Research NOT TU/e / Graduation TU/e)]. Technische
Universiteit Eindhoven.
Jablonka, E. (2015). The evolvement of numeracy and mathematical literacy curricula and the construction of hierarchies
of numerate or mathematically literate subjects. ZDM, 47(4), 599-609. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0691-6
Lefa, B. (2014). The Piaget theory of cognitive development: an educational implications. Educational psychology, 1(1),
1-8.
Liljedahl, P. (2015). Numeracy task design: a case of changing mathematics teaching practice. ZDM - International
Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0703-6
Liu, H. (2020). Low-numerate adults, motivational factors in learning, and their employment, education and training
status in Germany, the US, and South Korea. ZDM, 52(3), 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01108-x
Title of manuscript is short and clear, implies research results (First Author)
108
❒ ISSN: 2252-8822
McClure, R., & Sircar, S. (2008). Quantitative literacy for undergraduate business students in the 21st Century. The
Journal of Education for Business, 83(6), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.6.369-374
Niss, M., & Jablonka, E. (2014). Mathematical literacy. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp.
391–396). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_100
Nortvedt, G. A., & Wiese, E. (2020). Numeracy and migrant students: a case study of secondary level mathematics
education in Norway. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(3), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01143-z
O’Donoghue, J. (2002). Numeracy and mathematics. Irish Mathematical Society Bulletin, 48, 47-55.
Prince, R., & Frith, V. (2020). An investigation of the relationship between academic numeracy of university students in
South Africa and their mathematical and language ability. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(3), 433–445.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01063-7
Steen, L. (2001). The case for quantitative literacy. In L. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: the case for
quantitative literacy (pp. 1–22). Princeton: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Tout, D., & Gal, I. (2015). Perspectives on numeracy: reflections from international assessments. ZDM, 47(4), 691-706.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0672-9
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic mathematics education. Encyclopedia of mathematics
education, 713-717.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of planning education
and research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS
Title of manuscript is short and clear, implies research results (First Author)