Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation
INVESTOR OPPORTUNITY
MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Knowledge
Knowledge gained through monitoring and evaluation is at the core of every
organizational learning process.
Monitoring and evaluation provide information and facts, when accepted and
internalized, become knowledge that promotes learning.
Giving real time results to stakeholders means getting it right from the start.
Programme managers must act on the findings, applying the lessons learned to
modify the programme or project.
This learning by doing serves the immediate needs of the programme or project,
and it also may provide feedback for future programming.
Learning
Learning describe as continuous, dynamic process of investigation where the
key elements are EXPERIENCE, KNOWLEDGE, ACCESS and
RELEVANCE.
It requires a culture of inquiry and investigation , rather than one of the response and
reporting.
This is more easily accomplished when people are given the chance to observe, engage in,
and invent or discover strategies for dealing with particular types of problems or development
issues.
KNOWLEDGE is content – and context-specific information capable of bringing change or
more effective actions at a wider level that can contribute to new learning and knowledge.
Information gained from the processes maybe described as FEEDBACK.
Evaluative evidence does not always include direct, detailed observations as a source of
evidence.
Good evaluations are based on observation or experience rather than theory and is designed
to test validity, consistency and impacts.
* Analysis from research and review and other documents (secondary sources)
relevant to the development context;
The major challenge in monitoring is to gather, store and use information that serves
different levels of assessment.
Monitoring should also go beyond checking whether events are taking place as
planned.
Questions help identify what kind of feedback is needed to promote effective decisions
about projects, programs or outcomes on the part of project, program.
All monitoring and evaluation activities aim to ensure the relevance of information; to
use information in a targeted, timely and efficient manner; and to tap the existing
knowledge of key stakeholders.
One of the highly structured method of information/data collection for both monitoring
and evaluation is the questionnaire an instrument in which targeted respondents are
requested to “fill in the banks” on a form or to reveal specific information or opinions in
narrow options.
They also are useful as a preliminary screening method to help determine which
institutions or functions should be examined in more depth, perhaps through
interviews.
Any particular type of activity may require only a few of these resources, the most
appropriate depending on scope, the nature of the issue being addressed, the target
audience for the information and the previous experience of those requiring the
information. Once relevant information is accessed through these tools, a thorough
assessment must be undertaken to determine how to apply the recommendation from
the feedback.
Part of the feedback obtained through monitoring and evaluation will be in the form
of recommendations for action. Different types of recommendations from
monitoring and evaluation processes should be analyzed separately. This
accomplished by answering a number of questions about the type and consequences
of recommendations. The questions address both substantive and implementation
recommendations. Feasibilities and priorities based on the answers to these
questions must then be set for the short, medium and long terms.