Game Theory and Its Applications (BITS F314) : Paras Sachdeva
Game Theory and Its Applications (BITS F314) : Paras Sachdeva
(BITS F314)
Paras Sachdeva
www.parassachdevaeco.com
Paras Sachdeva BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Game Theory and its Applications (F314)
Game Theory and its Applications
Paras Sachdeva BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Game Theory and its Applications (F314)
Game Theory and its Applications
Max-Min Strategy
Given a strategic form game, Γ = ⟨N, (Si ) , (ui )⟩, the maxmin value or
security value of a player i (i = 1, . . . , n) is given by:
Paras Sachdeva BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Game Theory and its Applications (F314)
Game Theory and its Applications
2
1
A B
A 4,1 0,4
B 1,5 1,1
Paras Sachdeva BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Game Theory and its Applications (F314)
Game Theory and its Applications
Given a strategic form game Γ = ⟨N, (Si ) , (ui )⟩ has a pure strategy
Nash equilibrium (s1∗ , . . . , sn∗ ). Then
ui (s1∗ , . . . , sn∗ ) ≥ vi ∀i ∈ N.
Proof: ∀i ∈ N,
∗
ui (s1∗ , . . . , sn∗ ) = max ui si , s−i
.
si ∈Si
∗
ui si , s−i ≥ min ui (si , s−i ) .
s−i ∈S−i
Paras Sachdeva BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Game Theory and its Applications (F314)
Game Theory and its Applications
∗
max ui si , s−i ≥ max min ui (si , s−i ) .
si ∈Si si ∈Si s−i ∈S−i
ui (s1∗ , . . . , sn∗ ) ≥ vi ∀i ∈ N.
Paras Sachdeva BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Game Theory and its Applications (F314)
Game Theory and its Applications
Min-Max Strategy
Given a strategic form game, Γ = ⟨N, (Si ) , (ui )⟩, the minmax value of
a player i (i = 1, . . . , n) is given by:
∗ ∈S
Any strategy profile s−i −i of the other players that forces the
payoff vi on player i is called a minmax strategy profile (of the rest of
the players) against player i.
Paras Sachdeva BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Game Theory and its Applications (F314)
Game Theory and its Applications
2
1
A B
A 4,1 0,4
B 1,5 1,1
Paras Sachdeva BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Game Theory and its Applications (F314)
Game Theory and its Applications
vi ≥ Vi
∗ is a minmax strategy against player i.
Proof: Suppose s−i
∗
vi = max ui si , s−i ∀i ∈ N.
si ∈Si
∀i ∈ N that
∗
ui si , s−i ≥ min ui (si , s−i ) ∀si ∈ Si .
s−i ∈S−i
∗
vi = max ui si , s−i ≥ max min ui (si , s−i ) = vi ∀i ∈ N.
si ∈Si si ∈Si s−i ∈S−i
Paras Sachdeva BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Game Theory and its Applications (F314)
Game Theory and its Applications
Suppose a strategic form game Γ = ⟨N, (Si ) , (ui )⟩ has a pure strategy
Nash equilibrium (s1∗ , . . . , sn∗ ). Then ∀i ∈ N
ui (s1∗ , . . . , sn∗ ) ≥ vi
Proof: ∀i ∈ N,
∗
max ui si , s−i ≥ min max ui (si , s−i ) ∀i ∈ N.
si ∈Si s−i ∈S−i si ∈Si
ui (s1∗ , . . . , sn∗ ) ≥ vi ∀i ∈ N
Paras Sachdeva BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus Game Theory and its Applications (F314)