0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views19 pages

L3 BRM 010307

Uploaded by

Sarvesh Deodhar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views19 pages

L3 BRM 010307

Uploaded by

Sarvesh Deodhar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

Business Research Methods

L3: RESEARCH PROBLEM, PROCESS, AND DESIGN


PROF: NEIL CHAVAN
Recap

 Types of Questionnaire  Rating Scales (Dichotomous, Category,


Semantic Differential, Numerical,
 Personally Administered, Mail and Itemized Rating, Likert, Fixed or constant
Electronic sum, Stapel, Graphic, Ranking,
 Principles of Wording Consensus)
 Content, Language, Type, Sequence,  Measuring Goodness of Data
personal information  Validity
 Getup of Questionnaire  Content (face)
 Introduction, Organizing Section,  Criterion (Concurrent, Predictive)
Personal Data, Open-ended,
Concluding  Construct (Convergent, Divergent)

 Measurement & Scaling  Reliability


 Stability (test-retest, parallel form)
 Types of Scales
 Consistency (inter-item, split-half)
 Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, Ratio
Agenda:

 Checking reliability and validity in SPSS


 Recap of Statistics Concepts
 Research Problem
 Preliminary Research
 Components of Problem Statement
 Evaluating Good Problem Statement:
 Types of Research
 Exploratory
 Descriptive
 Causal
 Components of Research Proposal
 Literature Review
SPSS Practice

 Checking Reliability and Validity of data

 Optimising the Reliability of questionnaire


Reliability using Cronbach’s alpha

Critical values
Alpha Internal consistency
Greater than 0.90 Excellent
Between 0.80 and 0.90 Very good
Between 0.70 and 0.80 Good
Between 0.60 and 0.70 Acceptable (for exploratory studies
only)
Between 0.50 and 0.60 Poor
Lower than 0.50 Unacceptable
Validity using Pearson correlation

Assuming 5% level of significance

 If p value is less than 0.05, the item is considered as valid


 If p value is greater than 0.05, item is considered as invalid
Basic Statistics

 Measures of Central tendency  Measures of Variability Person Age


 Mean  Range 1 22
 (22+24+….+31+34)/9=28  34-22=12
2 24
 Median  Standard Deviation:
3 26
 (9+1)/2=5th term=28
 Mode 4 27
 31 5 28
 Variance: 6 29
7 31
 Inter Quartile Range
 Q1=26, Q2= 28, Q3=31
8 31
 Q3-Q1 = 31-26=5 9 34
Normal Distribution
Standard Normal Distribution
Skewness
Kurtosis

 Talks about the shape of tail


(flat or steep) of distribution
 Kurtosis= 3 (Normal)
 Kurtosis >3 (Leptokurtic)
 Kurtosis <3 (Platykurtic)
Research Problem

A "problem" signifies a gap between the current state and an ideal state.
It can indicate areas for improvement or issues requiring answers.

Stages in Research Process:


 Identification of Broad Problem: Recognize a management problem.
 Preliminary Research: Conduct initial information gathering.
 Definition of Research Problem: Refine the problem into a specific,
researchable topic.
Preliminary Research

 Gain a better understanding of the broad problem area.

 Narrow down the problem to a researchable topic.

 Answer key questions:


 What is the problem?
 Why does it exist?
 Is it important?
 What are the benefits of solving it?
Components of Research Problem

1. Research Objective(s):
 Defines the purpose of the study.
 Brief yet clear communication of the project's focus.

2. Research Question(s):
 Specifies what needs to be learned about the topic.
 Guides data collection and analysis.
Evaluating Good Problem Statement

• Managerial Perspective: Addresses existing problems or areas for improvement.


• Academic Perspective: Addresses gaps, scattered knowledge, contradictory
Relevance: findings, or challenges.

• Ability to answer research questions within project constraints (time, money,


resources, expertise).
Feasibility: • Requires a narrowly defined research question for manageable investigation.

• Vital for motivation throughout the research process.


Interest:
• Ensures genuine engagement with the problem statement.
Types of Research:

Exploratory Descriptive Causal

• Developed when: • Objective: Obtain data describing • Test whether one variable causes
• Little is known about a the topic. another to change.
phenomenon. • Quantitative or qualitative. • Examples: Effect of a reward
• Existing research results are • Describes characteristics of system on productivity, How
unclear or limited. objects, events, or situations. perceived value affects consumer
• The topic is highly complex. • Correlational studies explore purchase intentions.
• Insufficient theory is available. relationships. • Conditions for establishing
• Helps understand group causality:
• Often qualitative in nature
characteristics, systematic • Covariation of variables
• Flexible approach
aspects, and informs decision- • Temporal precedence
• Not easily generalizable to the
making. • No alternative causes
population
• Logical explanation (theory)
• Experimental designs often used
Components of Research Proposal

1. Working Title: 2. Background of the 3. Problem Statement: 4. Scope of the Study:


• Concise and descriptive. Study: • Purpose of the Study • Clearly defines
• Captures the essence of • Provides context and • Research Questions boundaries and
the research. rationale. limitations.
• Highlights existing • Identifies what is and isn't
knowledge and gaps. included.

5. Relevance of the 6. Research Design: 7. Time Frame: 8. Budget:


Study: • Type of Study • Specifies the duration of •Breakdown of costs.
•Emphasizes the importance • Data Collection Methods the study.
of the research. •Detailed expenditure
• Sampling Design • Includes report
•Addresses the potential submission deadlines.
items.
impact. • Data Analysis

9. Bibliography:
• Relevant sources
consulted.
• Acknowledges existing
literature.
How to do Literature Review

 Summary of the existing research work carried out on the topic


 Gaps identified in existing literature
 Proposed approach towards meeting the gap
Case Study: Fruitzone A

 What was the research problem?


 Which type of research was explored and why?

You might also like