Issues in Psychological Testing

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT (CC9)

M.A SEMESTER-2
ETHICAL ISSUES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING

Dr. Saba Farheen

UGC NET, UGC PDF, Rajasthan SET, PhD

Part Time Assistant Professor

Department of Psychology, Patna

University Email id-

[email protected]
Ethical issues in Psychological Testing:- Psychological Testing needs to be
conducted in a fair and ethical manner, in accordance with relevant equal
opportunities legislation and professional codes of practice. Professional bodies
have ethical codes of practice, often including specific codes, and anyone
making assessments should be familiar with the relevant code of practice.
Several testing organizations have published practice guidelines to help define
the scope of responsible test use. Sources of test use guidelines include
teaching groups (AFT, NCME, NEA, 1990), the American Psychological
Association (APA, 1992b), the Educational Testing Service (ETS, 1989), the
Joint Committee on Testing Practices (JCTP, 1988), the Society for Industrial
and Organizational Psychology (SIOP, 1987), and professional alliances
(AERA, APA, NCME, 1999). Some issues are as follows-
1. Confidentiality- Practitioners have a primary obligation to safeguard the
confidentiality of information, including test results, that they obtain from
clients in the course of consultations (Principle 5; APA, 1992a). Information
obtained in clinical or consulting relationships, or evaluative data concerning
children, students, employees and others are discussed only for professional
purposes and only with persons clearly concerned with the case.
2. Informed Consent-Before individuals undergo assessment they should give
their consent and, whatever the purpose, have a right to withdraw it. They have
a right to know what is about to happen, why it is needed, and understand the
implications of information given. The principle of informed consent is so
important that the Standards manual devotes a separate standard to it- Informed
consent implies that the test takers or representatives are made aware, in
language that they can understand, of the reasons for testing, the type of tests to
be used, the intended use and the range of material consequences of the
intended use. If written, video, or audio records are made of the testing session,
or other records are kept, test takers are entitled to know what testing
information will be released and to whom. (AERA et al., 1999).

3. Labelling- After the Psychological testing, a person is often subjected with


certain mental disorder. The labeling process may not only stigmatize the
person but also lower tolerance for stress and make treatment more difficult. In
view of the potentially negative effects of labels, a person should have the right
not to be labeled.
4. Data Protection- Test-takers must protect the client’s information. Sensitive
data could include a person’s:
• Ethnic origin
• Beliefs and opinions, for example on religion or politics
• Disabilities
• State of physical or mental health
• Sexual orientation
• Any convictions, offences committed or legal proceedings
5. Invasion of Privacy- When people respond to psychological tests, they have
little idea what is being revealed, but they often feel that their privacy has been
invaded in a way not justified by the test’s benefits. Psychologists must inform
subjects of the limits of confidentiality.
6. Communication of Test Results- Individuals who take psychological tests
anticipate that the results will be shared with them. Yet practitioners often do
not include one-to-one feedback as part of the assessment.
7. Consideration of Individual Differences- Knowledge of and respect for
individual differences is highlighted by all professional organizations that deal
with psychological testing. The American Psychological Association lists this
as one of six guiding principles. The relevance of this principle to
psychological testing is that practitioners are expected to know when a test or
interpretation may not be applicable because of factors such as age, gender,
race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability, language,
and socioeconomic status.
8. Divided Loyalties- It is the often conflicting commitments of the
psychologist who uses tests. A conflict arises when the individual’s welfare is
at odds with that of the institution that employs the psychologist. Psychologists
must inform all concerned where their loyalty lies. They must tell clients or
subjects in advance how tests are to be used and describe the limits of
confidentiality.
9. Test Security- Test materials must be kept secure. Test items are not
revealed except in training programs and when mandated by law, to protect test
integrity.
9. Human Rights violation- Different kinds of human rights are relevant to
psychological testing, including the right not to be tested. Individuals, who do
not want to subject themselves to testing, cannot be forced to do so. It is their
right to know their test scores and interpretations as well as the bases of any
decisions that affect their lives. The subjects have right to know who will have
access to test data and the right to confidentiality of test results (APA, 2010).

10. Dehumanization- With high-speed computers and centralized data banks,


the risk that machines will someday make important decisions about our lives
is always increasing. Such forms of testing remove any human element from
decision-making process. Technology tends to minimize individual freedom
and uniqueness.

11. Access to psychological testing- Everyone has not accessed to


psychological testing. Being tested can be expensive. Neurological and
psychiatric assessment are available to those who can afford them.
12. Test Security- Test materials must be kept secure. Test items are not
revealed except in training programs and when mandated by law, to protect test
integrity.

13. Sensitivity to Disabilities- Another important ingredient of valid test


administration is sensitivity to disabilities in the examinee. Impairments in
hearing, vision, speech, or motor control may seriously distort test results. The
Disability Discrimination Act (1995) refers to reasonable adjustment which
means, for example, that individuals having visual impairments are supported
by the use of large type or Braille materials. In the case of measures not having
time limits, such as questionnaires, people having visual disabilities may be
able to dictate responses.

14. Test Anxiety- Test anxiety refers to those phenomenological,


physiological, and behavioral responses that accompany concern about
possible failure on a test. There is no doubt that subjects experience different
levels of test anxiety about being tested.

You might also like