Sec3 - Compression Members
Sec3 - Compression Members
College of Engineering
School of Civil Engineering
4th Class (Semester 8)
18-Nov-21
Section-3:
Compression Members
elements. And as these plate elements are relatively thin, they may buckle locally when
subjected to compression. And this is one of the main reasons those lowering the cross-
2 of 10
Design of Steel Structures (BS 5950-1:2000) Compression Members
section’s load carrying capacity. To evaluate the load carrying capacity of the section based on
its susceptibility to buckling, the code of practice sets out (in Table-11 and -12) a practical
conservative approach suitable for most design situation. This approach classifies the sections
into four categories which are in their weakest order, plastic (class1), compact (class2), semi-
compact (class3) and slender (class4).
3.2 Effective length (𝐿𝐸 ) and slenderness ratio (𝜆):
The end restraint conditions of a strut member affecting the shape that it will buckle and
affecting its buckling resistance. And the effective length is the distance between the points of
curvature of the buckling shape.
The slenderness ratio (𝜆) is the ratio between the member effective length (𝐿𝐸 ) and the
radius of gyration (𝑟) of its cross-section; that is, 𝜆 = 𝐿𝐸 /𝑟 . The slenderness ratio expresses
the weakness of the member buckling resistance. The larger slenderness ratio the weaker
member buckling resistance.
For columns, the code of practice specified Table-22 for determining the effective length of
the member based on its end-restraint conditions, and then, the slenderness ratio can be
directly obtained by dividing the effective length by the relevant radius of gyration of the
cross-section.
For simple struts (Angles, Channels and T-sections), the code of practice specified Table-
25 for determining both the effective length and slenderness ratio of the member based on the
end connection type.
3.3 Compressive strength (𝑝𝑐 ):
Eng. Nyazi Tawfeeg
The compressive strength of a member is the ultimate load that can be sustained by the unit
area of the member cross-section. The compressive strength of a member influenced by a
3 of 10
Design of Steel Structures (BS 5950-1:2000) Compression Members
number of parameters, which are the steel design strength, slenderness ratio, axis of buckling,
section type and thickness. The code of practice specified Table-23 for determining the type
of strut curve of the member based on the member cross-section type, maximum thickness
and the relevant buckling axis. And then, the compressive strength can be obtained from
Table-24 based on the member strut curve, design strength and slenderness ratio.
3.4 Compressive resistance (𝑃𝑐 ):
The compressive resistance of a member is the ultimate load that can be sustained by the
total cross-sectional area of the member. The compressive resistance can be obtained based
on the cross-section classification as follows:
− 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1 (𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐), 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 2 (𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡) 𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 3 (𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑖 − 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡):
𝑃𝑐 = 𝑝𝑐 𝐴𝑔
− 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 4 (𝑠𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟):
𝑃𝑐 = 𝑝𝑐𝑠 𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓
Where:
𝑃𝑐 ≡ 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒.
𝑝𝑐 ≡ 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ.
𝐴𝑔 ≡ 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.
0.5
𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓
𝑝𝑐𝑠 ≡ 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑐 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜, 𝜆 ( ) .
𝐴𝑔
𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 ≡ 𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.
4 of 10
Design of Steel Structures (BS 5950-1:2000) Compression Members
Example 1
A 152 × 152 UC 30 steel section made of steel grade S275 is to be used as a column with a clear
height of 7 m. assume that the effective length of the column is equal to its actual length, calculate
the ultimate load that can be sustained by the column.
Solution:
152 × 152 UC 30
→ 𝜀 = √275
𝑃𝑦
= √275
275
= 1.0
𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
𝑅𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
→ 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 [ (𝑏/𝑇 < 9𝜀) ⇛ 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1 (𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐)
𝑏/𝑇 = 8.13
9𝜀 = 9
𝑊𝑒𝑏 𝑜𝑓 𝐻 − 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝐴𝑥𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑑/𝑡 = 19.0
→ 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑤𝑒𝑏 𝐹𝑐 (𝑑/𝑡 < 40𝜀) ⇛ 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 3 (𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑖 − 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡)
𝑟2 = 𝐴 ; 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑟2 = 1
𝑔 𝑝𝑦𝑤
120𝜀
[ 1+2𝑟2 = 40𝜀 = 40
𝐿𝐸 = 𝐿 = 7000 𝑚𝑚
5 of 10
Design of Steel Structures (BS 5950-1:2000) Compression Members
5) Slenderness ratio (𝜆):
𝐿𝐸 𝐿𝐸 7000
→𝜆=𝑟 = = = 182.8
𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑟𝑦 38.3
𝑅𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐻 − 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
→ 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 − 23 [ 𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 9.4 𝑚𝑚 < 40 𝑚𝑚 ⇛ 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 − 24(𝑐)
𝐴𝑥𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 → (𝑦 − 𝑦)
Example 2
Check the adequacy of 254 × 254 × 73 (UC) steel column section to carry a dead load of 880 kN
and live load of 270 kN if the column is made of steel grade S275. The column height is 5 m and
effectively restrained in position at both ends and in direction at one end.
Solution:
254 × 254 UC 73
6 of 10
Design of Steel Structures (BS 5950-1:2000) Compression Members
4) Classification of the section: (Table-11)
→ 𝜀 = √275
𝑃𝑦
= √275
275
= 1.0
𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
𝑅𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
→ 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 [ (𝑏/𝑇 < 9𝜀) ⇛ 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1 (𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐)
𝑏/𝑇 = 8.96
9𝜀 = 9
𝑊𝑒𝑏 𝑜𝑓 𝐻 − 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝐴𝑥𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑑/𝑡 = 19.0
→ 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑤𝑒𝑏 𝐹𝑐 1664×103 (𝑑/𝑡 < 52𝜀) ⇛ 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 3 (𝑠. 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝. )
𝑟2 = 𝐴 = 9310×275 = 0.65
𝑔 𝑝𝑦𝑤
120𝜀 120𝜀
[ = 1+2×0.65 = 52𝜀 > 40𝜀 __ 𝑜𝑘
1+2𝑟2
𝑅𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐻 − 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
→ 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 − 23 [ 𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 14.2 𝑚𝑚 < 40 𝑚𝑚 ⇛ 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 − 24(𝑐)
𝐴𝑥𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 → (𝑦 − 𝑦)
7 of 10
Design of Steel Structures (BS 5950-1:2000) Compression Members
Example 3
Solution:
100 × 75 × 10 Angle
→ 𝜀 = √275
𝑃𝑦
= √275
275
= 1.0
𝐴𝑥𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑏/𝑡 < 15𝜀
𝑏/𝑡 = 7.5
→ 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 [ ( 𝑑/𝑡 < 15𝜀 ) ⇛ 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 3 (𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑖 − 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝. )
𝑑/𝑡 = 10
(𝑏 + 𝑑)/𝑡 < 24𝜀
(𝑏 + 𝑑)/𝑡 = 17.5
8 of 10
Design of Steel Structures (BS 5950-1:2000) Compression Members
1.0𝐿𝑎 1.0×2500 0.7𝐿𝑎 0.7×2500
𝑎 − 𝑎 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 (𝑦 − 𝑦): = = 115.7 , + 30 = + 30 = 111.0
𝑟𝑎 21.6 𝑟𝑎 21.6
→ 𝜆𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 157.2
→ 𝑃𝑐 = 𝑝𝑐 𝐴𝑔
Example 4
Solution:
9 of 10
Design of Steel Structures (BS 5950-1:2000) Compression Members
2) Steel design strength: (Table-9)
→ 𝜀 = √275
𝑃𝑦
= √275
345
= 0.89
𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝐼𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑡
𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑒𝑔 ( )
→ 𝐷𝑜𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 [ 𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘 (𝑏/𝑡 < 10𝜀) ⇛ 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 2 (𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡)
𝑏/𝑡 = 8.3
10𝜀 = 10 × 0.89 = 8.9
2 2
𝐿
𝑦 − 𝑦 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠: √( 𝑦 ) + 𝜆𝑐 2 = √(2000) + 15.52 = 35.1 , 1.4𝜆𝑐 = 1.4(15.5) = 21.7
𝑟 𝑦 63.6
→ 𝜆𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 52.2
10 of 10