Wharton Casebook 2017
Wharton Casebook 2017
Wharton Casebook 2017
Casebook 2017
This casebook is meant to provide you with a brief overview of consulting recruiting and
interview preparation as well as a number of practice cases. Please note that this is meant to
supplement the excellent work done by our and other schools in earlier casebooks, so we
strongly encourage you to not make this your sole reference.
Good luck!
• Intellectually stimulating work and ability to • Fit interview – numerous behavioral questions
build a strong set of skills focusing on prior experiences
Process
• Wait in hospitality • Interviewer may • Interviewer will start • Your chance to ask
suite with other give personal case questions
candidates / recruiters background
• Keep track of time so • Walk back to hospitality
• Interviewer asks for • Questions about that you by when you suite with interviewer
you by name resume / are expected to reach a
• Handshake / greeting experience conclusion
• Walk to interview
suite / small talk
You should
• Appear warm, • Convince • Maintain confident, • Not ask stock
confident, interviewer that controlled, upbeat questions
professional you are fit for the demeanor • A good chance to get
firm to learn about the
• Pass the “airport interviewer’s personal
test” experiences at the firm
‘Go with the flow’ cases (typical of most firms) – You will determine which areas to
explore and lead the discussion, i.e. drive the case
Command and control (typical of McKinsey) – Interviewer guides the discussion and case
has heavy brainstorming components and quantitative work
• Listen actively • Mention you will take • Follow your plan! • Drive the case to a
a minute to plan your • Ask specific conclusion before
• Ask clarifying approach questions to test time expires
questions • Draw out a hypothesis • Answer the question
framework as • Adjust hypothesis • Take a definite stand
• Take judicious notes checklist of topics to and plan as data • Make best conclusion
explore
• Organize notes as emerges with data on hand
slides • Select 3 to 5 major • Organize notes as
topic areas • Make
slides recommendations and
• Formulate an initial • Identify relevant sub- • Highlight insights follow them with
hypothesis about topics from any numerical supporting evidence
possible solutions • Present plan of calculations • Address “risks” and
attack to interviewer • Note conclusions “next steps”
• Write down key – start with the most
question important
Case 1: Unicloth
● Product
○ What do they sell?
○ Where is it made?
○ Competitive product?
● Market
○ Who are the competitors?
○ What are the economic conditions?
○ Have there been new entrants?
● Revenue
○ Average price per unit
○ Number of units sold in the US per day
● Cost
○ COGS
○ Rent
○ Store maintenance
○ Labor
○ Cost of lost sales
Product:
o This company sells casual clothing, think jeans, t-shirts, knit sweaters, dresses, etc.
o They follow the designs of the company’s home market in Asia
o They are manufactured in China and Bangladesh
Market:
o The retail market has been stable, no economic downturns, etc.
Revenue:
o Price: average product price is ~$40. This is in line with mid-tier competitors such as
American retailer Bap and a bit below European retailer Mara
Revenue
● Revenue
○ Price: average product price is ~$40. This is in line with mid-tier competitors such as
American retailer Bap and a bit below European retailer Mara
○ Sales:
■ Market sizing: The retailer has a US presence comprised of three mall stores plus
one flagship store on 5th Avenue. Have candidate attempt to calculate annual
sales based on intuition.
● Three mall stores:
○ Sell on average 1,375 items per day
○ Have candidate calculate: 1375 items * $40 = $55,000 per day
○ $165,000 per day all mall stores put together
○ $60,225,000 annual revenue from mall stores
Costs
● Costs - have candidate brainstorm what costs might be. If they don’t come up with all of
them, give them the below
○ COGS
■ Profit margin on clothing sales is 30%
■ Cost of items per year is $125 M * .7= $87.5M
■ Round to $90M/year
○ Rent:
■ Flagship store rent: $1.5 M per month = $18 M per year
■ Mall store: $200K per month * 3 stores = $600K per month, $7.2 M per year
■ Round to $25M per year
○ Maintenance of stores, utilities, etc.
■ $5 M per year
Costs Continued
● Costs - continued
○ Labor:
■ Flagship store:
● 500 associates, average 20 hours per week, $8.5 per hour =
$85,000/week, $4.42 M per year
● 5 managers, $100K salary = $.5M per year
■ Mall stores:
● 20 associates per store * 3, 20 hours per week, $8.5/hour
○ $10,200/week, $530,400 per year
● 1 manager, $100K salary
○ $.12 M per year
■ Total labor cost:
● Round to $6M per year
○ Storage, sending unsold clothes back to warehouse, markdowns, etc.
■ $12M per year
● Total costs
○ $138 M- not breaking even!! (Under by $13M vs. $125 M revenue)
Improving Profitability
Now that we have all of the revenue and costs, let’s work on making the company more
profitable. Have the candidate brainstorm and then guide them through the below:
● Costs
○ Manufacturing- We are already producing our clothing in the cheapest manner
possible.
○ Shipping- We could cut 5% of our COGS by shipping the clothing by boat instead of
air
■ Savings: $4.5M annual (90M * 5%)
○ Labor- We have what we need, cannot reduce
○ Rent- Have candidate brainstorm how you could potentially reduce the rent burden.
Some options:
■ Move location of flagship- No, we need it for marketing
■ Close mall stores- We are not ready to make that move as we are hoping to
continue expanding in the suburbs in the future
■ Share the rent with another business- YES! Opening a coffee shop within the
store would cut 25% of our debt burden at the flagship store.
● Savings: $1.75M annual
Improving Profitability
● Revenue
○ Have candidate brainstorm how we can improve revenue
■ Train the sales staff better to sell- No, they’re pretty well trained
■ Lower prices- No, it wouldn’t solve our margin issue
■ Online store- We are not ready to make that investment at this time
■ Turns out that American customers don’t love the styles and have some
trouble with Asian sizes (the styles tend to be too conservative, the colors are
too muted, our clothing tends to run small for the US market)
■ Adjusting design and sizes and continuing to manufacture separately for the
American market will cost us $12M annually, but it will provide $23M
additional revenue per year
● Incremental revenue: $11M annual
● Total incremental income
○ $1.75M + $4.5M savings
○ $11M incremental revenue
○ Total $17.25M→ makes up for $13M deficit
Recommendation
The CEO is about to walk in and she would like to hear the candidate’s recommendations- have
him/her make some. *Make sure you say she and give the candidate feedback if he/she falls prey
to bias and calls the CEO a “he”*
Currently we are seeing revenues of $125M annually, but costs of $138M, meaning we are $13M
in the red. However, we have studied the cost and revenue structure of your retail operation and
found that there are a few actions you can take at this time. On the cost side, we recommend
changing your means of shipping from air to boat, a change we have found will bring $4.5M in
annual savings. Additionally, we recommend seeking a partner to share your rent/space at the
flagship store. We believe, for example, that placing a coffee shop within the store would save you
25% in rent, for a savings of $1.75M annually and perhaps encourage your customers to shop
more. Finally, we recommend revamping your inventory for the American market by adjusting
designs and sizes to better meet demand. We estimate this will drive $11M in additional annual
revenue. Together, these measures will more than make you profitable, breaking even and making
$4.25M in profit. Potential risks of this plan include having an unreliable retail partner at the
flagship store, making products that the American market still doesn’t like, and delaying inventory
stocking through the new shipping method. For this, we recommend a study into whom the retail
partner should be, engaging in extensive market research to produce the correct SKUs for the
market, and adjusting US warehouse operations and lead times to ensure that stocking is not
delayed.
Where else does the client currently operate besides Brazil? The client operates only in Brazil, has scoped opportunities in South
America. Their staff speaks primarily Portuguese.
Does the client operate in any industries besides road concessions? Are No, the client currently only focusses on road concessions (building and
their adjacent industries they could pursue? operating public roadways).
Who are the clients typical customers and how do they typically win The clients’ customers are always municipal, state, or national
business? governments. They bid, usually through competitive RFPs.
Does the company want to focus on a specific region, or is it open to all The client wants to consider all geographies, with a bias towards
geographies? opportunities in South America.
Based on the graph, which markets should our client focus their efforts on? Which should
it definitely eliminate? Correct answers here are Mexico, Colombia, Chile and Peru (upper
right quadrant). You may also be able to argue Argentina as well – for which ease of doing
business is not enough but pipeline is strong.
Assuming the client chooses to enter one or more of these markets, how should it
approach market entry? Correct answers here could be greenfield or primary investment, joint
venture (JV), or acquire a competitor (M&A).
What are the primary pros and cons of each market entry approach?
• Primary investment: limited knowledge of market / greater control
• JV: less control / some market knowledge
• M&A: more expensive / lower idiosyncratic risk / local market knowledge
Graphical Interpretation
Data for interviewee
Mexico
Colombia
Argentina Chile
Peru
Ecuador
Bolivia Paraguay
Costa Rica
Venezuela
Honduras Panama
Km 300 NA
$/Km $5 NA
Once interviewee has come up with an ROIC, ask them for their conclusion.
Wrap-up
What should the client do?
The client should enter a South American market (preferable Mexico, Chile, or
Colombia) through a primary investment:
• There are high levels of cultural similarity and low levels of managerial
complexity within the South American markets.
• Mexico, Chile, Peru and Colombia all have large pipelines and attractive
business environment relative to other South American markets.
• A primary investment in one of these markets is likely to yield a higher ROIC and
shorter payback period relative to currently existing M&A opportunities.
As follow on steps, the client may wish to understand whether further negotiations
may yield a lower price for an M&A opportunity, how sensitive our investment
analyses are to macroeconomic factors, and the likelihood of winning deals as a
primary investor in the new country.
Topics Tested: market sizing, break-even analysis and payback period, mathematical
calculation,
Synergies / dis-
Market size Profitability Competition Deal Price
synergies
• How large is the • How profitable • Can we leverage • Is Almond Co. • What is the deal
market for will this product Peanut Co.’s the preferred price?
snacking be (e.g., pricing, existing brand in the • How will we
almonds? costs)? capabilities market? finance the deal?
(distribution,
• How much is this • Is snacking • Who are the
mktg, sales)?
industry expected almonds a more current
to grow? Is it premium market • Will entering competitors?
trending up, then snacking cannibalize • What are the
down, or peanuts, in terms existing sales? barriers to entry?
stagnant? of price? • Is the overlap
• How large is the
between almond threat of new
and peanut entrants?
customers high?
Sample Clarifying Questions and Answers
Are we only looking at the snacking almond Yes – all other almonds (e.g., for cooking) are
market? excluded
Since the snacking peanut market growth is No – the almond industry is not impacted because
slowing, is this trend affecting the entire snacking almonds are considered to be higher in nutrients
nut industry?
• Total number of packets: 0.75B + 1.8B + 1.8B = 4.5B (round to 5B) Pressure test if this is too
• Cost of 1 packet: $2 large
• Potential Benefits
- Cross sell almond products to existing peanut customers
- Leverage current distribution network to expand reach of Almond Co. and drive
sales
- Can extend innovation from peanuts to almonds (e.g., flavor, packaging, etc)
• Potential Risks
- Potential for cannibalization of existing sales
- Potential of brand dilution
Prompt: A major U.S. shoe manufacturer is currently manufacturing its entire product
line domestically. Because of increased labor costs and competitive pressure, the
manufacturer is now interested in understanding whether it should offshore some
or all of its production and, if so, where it should offshore to and what percent of
its total product line should be manufactured onshore vs. offshore. What factors
should the client consider as it compares onshore to offshore manufacturing?
What other products does the client currently sell besides shoes? The client currently specializes in shoe manufacturing, but also
manufactures some apparel as well.
Where else does the client currently sell its products besides the U.S.? The client currently sells its products in developed markets (North
America, Europe, and Australia)
What are competitors, both domestic and foreign, currently doing with Most of the clients’ competitors currently do not offshore their
respect to onshoring / offshoring? production due to manufacturing and managerial complexity.
Outside of the U.S., in which markets are shoes typically manufactured? Lower quality shoes tend to be manufactured in China, Southeast Asia,
Where are high-quality shoes manufactured? and Central America, high quality ones in Eastern Europe.
Unit Profitability
The client has begun assessing a manufacturer based in Vietnam. They want us to do an in-
depth analysis of the per-unit profitability of shoes produced in our existing facility vs. the
Vietnam facility. Assume no capex in either case (U.S. capital is sunk, Vietnam arrangement
would be cost plus). What does the equation for per-unit profitability for shoes look like?
profit = retail revenue – (COGS + labor + SG&A + transportation + quality + tariffs + retail margin)
Give the interviewee the below data and have them solve for profitability.
U.S. Vietnam
Retail revenue $200 $200
COGS 30% 20%
Direct labor 25% 5%
SG&A 20% 25%
Transportation 4% 10%
Quality 1% defect rate 5% defect rate
Tariffs NA 10%
Retail margin 10% 10%
Profit $10 $15
• Material costs and labor costs are much lower in Vietnam than in the U.S., driving most of
the Vietnam manufacturing cost savings.
• Production quality is significantly worse in Vietnam (5% vs. 1%), and further quality
deterioration would impact profitability and swing the decision to the U.S.
• Producing in Vietnam also entails added transportation and tariff costs, which are vulnerable
to macroeconomic shifts (increased fuel costs, increased tariffs).
Are we missing anything else in this analysis that might drive costs higher in the
offshoring case? Or is it possible that the client should split manufacturing across the two
options and, if so, what proportion of shoes should be made in Vietnam vs. the U.S.? Once
the interviewee has touched on most the above, introduce this question. Direct the interviewee
to the opening framework and ask about lead time and the volatility of demand.
ℎ
Offshored fraction = 1 − 𝛿
2𝜇∆𝑐
𝛿 = standard deviation of demand / period = 20
𝜇 = average demand / period = 1,000
ℎ = holding cost / unit / period = $1
∆𝑐 = Vietnam cost advantage / unit = $5 (can ask interviewee)
$1
80% = 1 − 20
2∗1000∗5
Therefore, based on these assumptions, the client should manufacture 80% of its
shoes in Vietnam and the remaining 20% in the U.S.
Wrap-up
What should the client do?
The client should manufacture 80% of its shoes in Vietnam, and 20% of its shoes
in the U.S. as a hedge against volatility and keeping in mind the cost of capital.
• The unit profitability advantage for Vietnam excluding lead time and the cost of
working capital is $5 ($15 vs. $10).
• This cost advantage comes primarily from lower COGS and labor costs, and is
somewhat offset by quality, transportation, and tariff costs.
• Demand is not highly volatile, nor is the client’s cost of capital, and as a result,
we find that the majority of expected demand can be met by Vietnam capacity.
As follow-on steps, the client may wish to understand the sensitivity of these
assumptions to quality, transportation, and tariff costs, as well as future changes to
the volatility of demand for the product. Greater volatility or higher cost of capital
will push the client to shift more manufacturing back to the U.S.
Prompt: The city of Chicago is planning to sell the rights to all of its parking meters for 20 years to a private
company. The idea is that in exchange for a lump sum, the city of Chicago would turn over the operation and
revenue stream of its ~40,000 parking spaces to a private operator.
The deal will bring in a big amount of cash for a cash-strapped city and relieve it of the responsibility of
maintaining meters – something it isn’t very good at. The city is planning to use a competitive bidding process
with the highest bidder winning the contract. Bidders will be expected to set the prices for their parking meters
and should be aware that they bear the risk of consumer demand for parking spaces and should factor that in
when pricing their bids. Additionally, the contract also requires a high-tech upgrade replacing the old coin-
based meters with new machines that accept cash, credit or debit cards, which is a service enhancement that
should be incorporated in the bid.
Your consulting firm has been hired by the Company Parking GenNext to give a reasonable price for the
rights to collect all money* from Chicago’s meters over a 20 year timeframe to win the competitive bid. How
would you go about estimating it?
*Money collected on parking tickets goes to the city, not the company.
During Stage 1, the candidate will do a relatively simple estimate based on future revenues and expenses
(classic revenue / expense framework)
During Stage 2, as a follow-up to the answer in Stage 1, the candidates can be asked to think more creatively
of other considerations, e.g., alternative pricing strategies, concerns on quality (brainstorming portion)
As long as the candidate uses a framework that includes the things above, it should be considered strong
http://chicagometers.com/fact-sheet.aspx
I Downtown Loop 3 3%
100%
• Assume Ring I usage is 12 hours per day, Ring II 8 hours per day, Ring III4 hours
per day
• Assume weekend / weekday usage are same (ask them what do they think if you
want to assess creativity but then for the math, ask them to assume it’s the
same)
• Assume 30 days a month, 12 months a year
Cost Assumptions (1 of 2)
Beyond estimating the value of the revenues from parking meters, the candidate should explain
what costs are necessary to enforce the system. This should include:
• One-time investment to upgrade the parking meters to accept cash, credit and debit cards.
For simplicity, we can assume that the newly installed meters will have a life of 20 years and
the bidder will not be expected to change them during the period.
• Recurring operating expenses – labor costs, maintenance costs, etc.
One-time investment
• 40,000 parking spaces ≠ 40,000 new parking meters.
• We can assume (or help lead the candidate to assume) that the 40,000 old single-space coin-
operated meters will be replaced 5,000 new meters (such that each meter is capable of
handling 8 spaces)
• Unit cost for one parking meter could be assumed to be in $20K, including installation costs
Recurring expenses
• Candidates should be expected to estimate how many people will be required, the hourly
wage per worker, ongoing maintenance costs, etc.
Cost Assumptions (2 of 2)
Recurring expenses
• Candidates should be expected to estimate how many people will be required, the hourly
wage per worker, ongoing maintenance costs, etc.
• Candidates should be expected to put some thought into the risks to consumer demand
when estimating revenues and how it would impact the growth / decline. A few
considerations include changes in population, changes in preferences (consumers preferring
to bike), economic activity, advancements in technology (driverless cars, alternatives to
parking meters, etc.)
• For numerical calculations they can assume that the growth rate is zero
Hours per day Number of Meters Price per hour Annual revenue
(a) (b) (c) axbxcx
30 days x 12 months
Suburbs +
4 32400 1 46,656,000
Others
or ~2
20-year revenue 1,981,440,000
billion
20-yr Cost
One-time Investment
Number of new machines (40000 / 8) - (a) 5,000
Cost per machine 20,000
Total one time cost 100,000,000
Recurring Expense
Monthly per machine maintenance cost - (b) 200
Annual Maintenance Cost - (a) x (b) x 12 months 12,000,000
Hourly Wage - (c) 10
Number of People - (40,000 / 80) - (d) 500
Annual Wage - (a) x (d) x 8 hours x 30 days 12,000,000
Total annual recurring costs 24,000,510
20-year recurring costs 480,010,200
• In this more creative component of the case, we can ask the candidate to think of some of the other
considerations that will test how innovative they are in their problem-solving approach.
• One idea is to have them think of alternative pricing strategies. These could include variable pricing schemes
(e.g. surge pricing for busier times of the day) and potentially leasing of parking spots to specific people, or
whatever else the candidate can come up with , keeping in mind that there are 20 years for executing these
schemes. Think MGEC!
• Candidates could also be asked to think of the different kinds of technological advancements along the way
that would help the bidding company stay competitive and boost revenue. For example, the bidding
company could consider launching mobile apps that would inform customers of parking availability if they
are near a parking meter and would also send alerts if the time is expiring.
• Depending on how the question goes, the interviewer can also ask questions on reputation and image. For
example, in any privatization, the public expects that the quality of service will improve. So what would be
the strategy that the candidate would suggest to ensure that?
Case Similar to Cases at Firms: Bain and BCG Final Round cases
Prompt: Our client SLS is one of the world’s largest oil and gas services provider
operating in 85 countries and employing about 100,000 people from over 140
countries. They help find, scope and drill as much oil and gas as possible for their
clients – which range from major international oil companies to petrostates such
as Saudi Arabia and Russia.
Of late they are seeing a very high attrition rate among their Field Engineer
(FE) population across several offices globally, the Mumbai office in India being
one of the most affected. The CEO is concerned and has asked you for advice
specifically for the Mumbai office. She hopes that if the problem can be fixed in
Mumbai, similar fix can be implemented everywhere else. It is indeed a matter of
grave urgency for SLS.
This case is heavy on brainstorming and is relatively difficult to structure. It is also more qualitative than
quantitative. Leave it up to the interviewee to structure as (s)he wishes and give them information only if
requested. Since this case is from an industry and function that people might not be familiar with, it is
important to understand the context clearly before diving deeper. If the interviewee gets stuck at any point
during the case, feel free to direct them towards what needs to be evaluated.
Exhibit 3 shows utilization (% of FEs not on vacation) and effective utilization (% of FEs offshore) trends. Wait
for interviewee to ask about relevant information – otherwise show this and ask for observations.
> Gap widening between the two – fewer FEs on vacation and more FEs sitting in office not making bonus!
> Managers not using FEs efficiently (Why?) – only 1 or 2 FEs required in the office on any given day.
a. Based on Exhibits 2 & 3, calculate the no. of FEs expected to be in the office any given day.
b. Now given that on any given day only 2 FEs are needed in the office, 1 standby FE for each of the 25 rigs
and 36% of the rigs have operations on-going, how high can effective utilization be taken and how many FEs
can be sent on vacation?
a.
50 FEs with a utilization of 80% and effective utilization of 60%.
40 FEs (50*80%) are at work and 30FEs (50*60%) are on the rig. This translates to 10 FEs being in the office on
any given day, and 10 on vacation.
b.
25 (1*25) standby FEs for each rig + 9 (1*25*36%) FEs on rigs due to operations – This information about 2nd FE
sent to rig during operations was given earlier to the interviewee in Slide 4. If they miss this, remind them again.
34 FEs are therefore needed offshore which translates into an effective utilization of 68% (34/50).
Given only 2 FEs are needed in the base besides this, 14 FEs can be sent on vacation.
a. What information to collect and how to collect it (Ask this Question if interviewee doesn’t)
> FEs should be interviewed first before managers and HR - in person meeting preferred over a questionnaire
> Ask about managers, motivation, reasons for their peers quitting, if SLS is meeting their expectations
b. Potential reasons for high attrition (Ask this Question if interviewee doesn’t. Following are the FACTS
– agree or disagree with the interviewee as (s)he mentions these)
> Internal (SLS-related) reasons
> Management change in 2014 – risk-averse; keeping more people on reserve rather than on vacation
> Fewer vacations/days-off for FEs and more days in the office – no bonus
> Those FEs which are offshore are spending a lot of time offshore
Exhibit 4 showing Level Loading should be shared once the above point has been made (or not). This shows
the % of FE population spending different amount of time offshore at a single stretch. Remember 3 wks. is
optimal. Interviewee should drill deeper and enquire about segmentation of this data.
Exhibit 5 shows that Sr. FEs are ‘suffering’ longer runs offshore and Jr. FEs are consequently making lesser
bonus – both are unhappy! Interviewee should question why this might be happening (otherwise ask them).
Reason is that the new risk-averse management is not confident with Jr. FEs’ competency.
> No transfer outs – demotivating FEs stuck in the same office for years
> More new recruits – inadequate cohesion within the group
a. Short-term
> Train Management – Make the offshore staffing system process-driven rather than people-driven
> Increase vacation/time-off by reducing utilization but offset by increasing effective utilization
> Swap FEs predictably after they spend ~3 wks. offshore on the rig
> Make offshore life more enjoyable by sending food, games etc. from town
> Improve level loading by improving competency of Jr. FEs – track competency and train as required
> Introduce team-building activities to improve team-spirit
> Increase vacation/time-off by reducing utilization but offset by increasing effective utilization
> Swap FEs predictably after they spend ~3 wks. offshore on the rig
> Make offshore life more enjoyable by sending food, video games etc. from town
b. Long-term
> Keep transfer-out rates reasonably healthy as before, or send FEs on short-term assignments outside
Mumbai
> Recruit the right talent – set expectations correctly during employer info sessions
> Relook at the compensation structure to make it competitive again
> Internal or External (i.e. on-campus) marketing to promote the unique work-culture at SLS
> Hire more engineers (but it will increase cost)
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
# Engineers (start) 50 52 55 51 50
# Engineers (end) 52 55 51 50 50
# Hired 6 6 5 2 6
# Fired 1 2 1 0 0
# Quit 2 3 7 10 14
# Transferred Out 4 3 1 0 0
# Transferred In 3 5 0 7 8
Attrition % 3.9 5.6 13.2 19.8 28.0
Exhibit 3
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Exhibit 4
Level Loading
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
< 1 week 1 - 2 weeks 2 - 3 weeks 3 - 4 weeks > 4 weeks
Exhibit 5
> 4 weeks
3 - 4 weeks
2 - 3 weeks
1 - 2 weeks
< 1 week
Sr. Jr.
Notes the casegiver: This is a highly structured case without the use of a traditional
framework. That being said, the interviewee should still structure their thoughts, be
engaging, and come up with a great final recommendation.
Prompt: Our company is pitching to the President of the Salt Lake City International
Airport next week, hoping to earn a big contract with the Airport moving forward.
We know that the SLC Airport is the only commercial airport for more than 2.5M
people in the greater Salt Lake City area, is the 21st busiest in the nation with 650
flights per day, and is owned entirely by the City of Salt Lake. The Airport President
is a mayor-appointed individual who oversees all aspects of the airport’s operation.
•This case a bit atypical as it does not call for a typical framework. That being
said, answers should still be structured, math should still be organized (and
correct!), and time for brainstorming (10-15sec) should be used.
•Continually push the interviewee to consider a typical airport and the Salt Lake
City market.
•Continually push the interviewee to use airport related terminology (passengers
in the terminal not customers buying widgets).
Off the top of your head, what are the most important
things that the Airport President must think about?
Answer guide: A good answer will be structured and consider the various stakeholders of an airport (i.e.
Passengers, Airlines, Airport Vendors, Security, City Tourism, City Chamber of Commerce).
The three most important things the Airport President should think about when running the airport are the
effects to Passengers, Airlines, and the Airport’s Vendors.
Passengers are important because if passengers have a bad experience, they will choose to drive, take the
train, or visitors simply might choose to go to Colorado to go skiing and locals might simply not travel. This will
certainly hurt the airport.
The Airlines are another key stakeholder, because if they are unhappy they will fly to SLC less. This will hurt the
local business and tourism economy, likely increase airfares if there are fewer flights which hurts passengers,
and also lead to layoffs if there are fewer passengers.
The Airport Vendors are another important stakeholder, because they affect the passenger experience and
represent local jobs. The Airport President should make sure that there are an appropriate number and variety
of vendors, and similar to a shopping mall, be the intermediary between the different vendors.
• What about people dropping off friends at the airport? Taxi drivers, Uber drivers, and people picking up
their friends are not passengers.
• How about Pilots, Flight Attendants, and TSA Workers? We are only counting people who have a paid
ticket to fly, not people at the airport for their job.
• Are we counting only one-ways or roundtrips? We are considering each visit to the airport. For
example, a family of four traveling roundtrip from SLC to Los Angeles for vacation would count as 8
passengers (4 when they leave and 4 when they return).
We know there are 650 flights per day. Let’s say the average plane has 30 rows of 6 seats per row, or 180
seats per flight. Most flights are 80% full. So we know there must be
365 Days
x650 daily flights
x180 seats per flight
x75% booked
= ~34M passengers per year
Let’s consider SLC residents and visitors as two separate constituents. Starting with residents, we know there
are 2.5M people. Let’s break them down into a few groups.
1. Let’s say 10% are people who travel regularly for work (like consultants). They travel roundtrip every
week probably 45 weeks per year. Assuming people live to 100 with equal distribution, we’re really
only talking about people 25-65 which is 40 years of 25K people each. That’s 40*25K*2*45=9M
2. Let’s say the next 10% of workers travel for work, but less frequently. Let’s say they make one trip a
month. That’s 40*25K*2*12= 2.4M
3. Let’s say the rest of the 80% of adults 25-65 are parents and, with all the kids, they travel once per
year for vacation or the holidays. That’s 40*25K*8*2*1= 1.6M and the kids 5-25 (maybe under 5 is too
young) is 20*25K*2*1=1M
4. Let’s say the senior citizens (older than 65) only travel once per year. That’s 35*25K*2*1=1.75M
Adding this all up, that’s 9M+2.4M+1.6M+1M+1.75M, or 15.75M resident passengers. Let’s double this
because planes are usually half local and half visitors, so there are 31.5M passengers each year.
• What would be the revenues and costs of the two? The restaurant would bring in a $15 check per
passenger, and cost $6 per passenger. The lounge would cost $30 per passenger who enters, and cost
$12 per passenger to provide.
• Does the airport already have either a sit-down restaurant or a lounge? No, the airport does not have
either.
Example of an answer:
First, let’s consider the financial element. We know a restaurant would earn ($15-$6=) $9 of profit per visitor,
while the lounge would bring in ($30-$12=) $18 of profit per guest. So they are both profitable, and depending
on how many passengers use the two we could say which is more profitable (ie, if there is more than twice the
interest in the restaurant, than the restaurant will be more profitable). Earlier I said passenger experience is a
key consideration and also airport vendors. Considering the passengers, we know the majority of passengers
are their for business reasons, and business travelers would most likely prefer a premium lounge. Considering
airport vendors, while there is not a sit-down restaurant, there must be counter or take-out food vendors who
would not like to see a sit-down establishment take away business, so they too would most likely prefer a
lounge. It seems that a lounge is the way to go.
Case Similar to Cases at Firms: Deloitte Human Capital first- and second-round
cases
Prompt, continued:
Yermakov Ltd. has spent the last year working with another consulting firm to
analyze and finalize its recent business acquisitions. Yermakov is now
approaching Deloitte Human Capital because, six months in to this new post-
acquisition era, the company is experiencing what one of Yermakov’s senior
staff referred to as “growing pains.” A large number of employees who worked
for the acquired companies declined offers to continue working under the
Yermakov umbrella, and customer acquisition and retention in the local fashion
market has been lower than expected. This is making long-time Yermakov
employees anxious, which is affecting their day-to-day performance.
Yermakov has approached Deloitte Human Capital for help stabilizing their
workforce and communicating a compelling change agenda.
Clarifying Questions
Pro tip: Human Capital cases have much longer prompts that typical consulting
cases, and it’s important to remember what you’ve been told. Don’t hold back on
the note-taking!
Pro tip: The interviewee should take a moment to ask 1-2 insightful clarifying
questions. Then briefly summarize the case.
Is the other consulting firm still working with the client? No – but they do have a point of contact from the team that’s
available for communication
OR
Yes – they’re still wrapping up final agreements
Are most of these 12 acquired companies located in countries Yes – that was part of the criteria for acquisition
where Yermakov already has a business presences?
For the acquired companies, did their staff have much advance It differed from company to company, but in general there usually
notice of the acquisition? was about a month’s notice to employees
Does Yermakov have an in-house team (apart from acquired No
company employees) that has expertise/professional background in
local fashion?
Framework
Pro tip: The interviewee should ask if they can take a minute to gather their
thoughts (put a framework together)
Pro trip: The framework below is recommended for Human Capital cases in
particular
Work stream 2 “” “” “”
Work stream 3 “” “” “”
Framework
Framework breakdown:
Business Issue: Use this as an opportunity to restate why you/your consulting team
has been asked to work with the client. What problems will you be solving?
Work streams: What approaches are you prioritizing to solve the client’s business
challenges? How will you break down these work steams into distinct phases
(assess, implement, evaluate)?
Pro tip: It is recommended to have three work streams. You can do more (suggest
no more than five), but be mindful that you have limited time to put your framework
together. To have the best of both worlds, stick to three and in the corner, have a
box for “Other Considerations.” This will show your interviewer that you’re aware of
other work stream potential, but that you also know how to prioritize.
Pro tip: Prioritize your work streams, and start with your most important one.
Explain why you think it’s the most important.
Framework
Pro tip: As you fill out your framework, be sure to note key risks of the approaches
and activities you’re recommending. What are ways to minimize these risks?
Pro tip: Time to fill out your framework is limited. Use shorthand whenever
possible, and leave some boxes/buckets sparse if needed.
Pro tip: Even though Human Capital cases aren’t “numbers” cases, human capital
work still needs to have a clear impact on the client’s revenues, profits, etc. You’ll
get bonus points on your framework if, as you talk through it, you call out top
line/bottom line impacts.
Pro tip: Clearly state your conclusions and recommendations before you wrap up
going through your framework.
Framework
Sample of Strong Framework for this Case:
Framework
Sample of Strong Framework for this Case:
Framework
Sample of Strong Framework for this Case:
- What do you think is the biggest risk with the plan you laid out? How will you
minimize it?
- I didn’t mention it earlier, but a major part of the challenge of all these
acquisitions is that each company works on a very different technology
platform. How would you deal with this aspect of the acquisition integration?
- Did the interviewee integrate firm knowledge as they went through the case? If
not, prompt them to do so.
- Did the interviewee make note of dependencies between work streams? If not,
prompt them about this with a question.
A: Very little advance notice was given to employees of acquired companies about
the acquisitions, and very limited information was provided to them about how the
acquisitions would affect their day-to-day work – work these employees are
extremely passionate about. This created a lot of unnecessary uncertainty and
anxiety. It doesn’t sound like Yermakov senior mgmt./HR went out to their newly
acquired companies to formally welcome people, develop rapport, hear concerns
or understand the culture of the companies they acquired. If Yermakov had actively
done more to demonstrate that it wasn’t just acquiring businesses, but also the
human capital within those businesses, stakeholders would have been more aligned
around the changes brought about via acquisitions.
Q: People get unhappy about this or that at their jobs all the time – it’s normal. Why
is this such a problem for Yermakov?
A: People are the most important asset a company has, and when people feel
undervalued, they underperform and often leave the company. Yermakov just made
a huge investment in acquiring companies, and in this case the human talent,
networks and passion for the work are the most valuable assets they captured. If
Yermakov isn’t able to retain their acquired employees – something which may
require allowing company sub-cultures to flourish – it risks losing major potential
upside on its investment.
A: This is where training comes in. Long-term Yermakov employees may not
become the company’s leading local fashion experts, but they can be trained on
key talking points and incentivized to identify synergies as a result of the
acquisitions. There can be professional rotations at local fashion
subsidiaries/acquired companies, site visits, etc. as well.
Case Similar to Cases at Firms: Deloitte Human Capital first- and second-round
cases
Waltham&Rose has sought out Deloitte Human Capital to develop and help
implement a seamless CRM technology adoption process, and to help ensure
new Europe-based employees feel they are a part of the Waltham&Rose “family,”
and represent the brand well.
The pharma industry has become increasingly competitive in recent years, with
peer companies having already invested significantly in global expansion and
technological advancements. Waltham&Rose executives feel they have no time to
waste in implementing the above changes.
Clarifying Questions
Pro tip: Human Capital cases have much longer prompts that typical consulting
cases, and it’s important to remember what you’ve been told. Don’t hold back on
the note-taking!
Pro tip: The interviewee should take a moment to ask 1-2 insightful clarifying
questions. Then briefly summarize the case.
Are any Waltham&Rose senior executives planning to relocate to There have been some discussions about this, but as yet there is no
Europe? firm plan for any senior executive to relocate
Since the company has operated purely domestically for decades, No
do that have any in-house expertise about European business
regulations?
You mentioned that some employees have worked for It’s largely people in their forties and fifties, most of whom have
Waltham&Rose for decades – what’s the demographic breakdown worked for the company for at least 10 years
of their workforce overall? In terms of age, in particular?
Is there already a plan in place for outsourcing the healthcare No – and outsourcing is new territory for Waltham&Rose
benefits?
Framework
Pro tip: The interviewee should ask if they can take a minute to gather their
thoughts (put a framework together)
Pro trip: The framework below is recommended for Human Capital cases in
particular
Work stream 2 “” “” “”
Work stream 3 “” “” “”
Framework
Framework breakdown:
Business Issue: Use this as an opportunity to restate why you/your consulting team
has been asked to work with the client. What problems will you be solving?
Work streams: What approaches are you prioritizing to solve the client’s business
challenges? How will you break down these work steams into distinct phases
(assess, implement, evaluate)?
Pro tip: It is recommended to have three work streams. You can do more (suggest
no more than five), but be mindful that you have limited time to put your framework
together. To have the best of both worlds, stick to three and in the corner, have a
box for “Other Considerations.” This will show your interviewer that you’re aware of
other work stream potential, but that you also know how to prioritize.
Pro tip: Prioritize your work streams, and start with your most important one.
Explain why you think it’s the most important.
Framework
Pro tip: As you fill out your framework, be sure to note key risks of the approaches
and activities you’re recommending. What are ways to minimize these risks?
Pro tip: Time to fill out your framework is limited. Use shorthand whenever
possible, and leave some boxes/buckets sparse if needed.
Pro tip: Even though Human Capital cases aren’t “numbers” cases, human capital
work still needs to have a clear impact on the client’s revenues, profits, etc. You’ll
get bonus points on your framework if, as you talk through it, you call out top
line/bottom line impacts.
Pro tip: Clearly state your conclusions and recommendations before you wrap up
going through your framework.
Framework
Sample of Strong Framework for this Case:
Framework
Sample of Strong Framework for this Case:
Framework
Sample of Strong Framework for this Case:
Pro tip: there aren’t a ton of Human Capital cases out there, but you can use the
same case multiple times – just push yourself to change the work streams each
time.
- In this case, how could you set the stage for additional business opportunities
later on?
- What do you think is the biggest risk with the plan you laid out? How will you
minimize it?
- Did the interviewee integrate firm knowledge as they went through the case? If
not, prompt them to do so.
- Did the interviewee make note of dependencies between work streams? If not,
prompt them about this with a question.
Q: Waltham&Rose does not have a plan in place when it comes to who will lead the
new offices in France and Germany. What are your thoughts on this?
A: It’s highly recommended that at least one senior executive from the US
headquarters relocate, at least for the medium-term, at each of the new offices.
This is essential for maintaining company culture, creating cohesion in a newly
international organization, and helping to ensure a seamless transition. Extensive
involvement of the HR Director will also be key. Leadership of the European offices
by formerly US executives will need to be balanced with German and French hires
with senior roles in the new offices. This will ease tensions borne out of cultural
differences, language barriers, lack of local knowledge, etc.
Q: You focused a lot on the CRM tool adoption, but didn’t talk much about the
outsourcing of health benefits. Can you talk a little more about this?
A: Waltham&Rose are new to outsourcing, and while they are taking this move in
order to ease workload during a time of growth, they need to be mindful of pain
points likely to occur during the transition to outsourcing. Employees typically get
anxious when unclear changes to their healthcare benefits are looming, which
negatively affects performance. It’s also unclear whether Waltham&Rose
understand that there are vastly different healthcare regulations in the US and
Europe, and multiple outsourcing partners may be required. Additionally, for
outsourcing to go well it will be important that employees can easily contact their
new healthcare benefits manager, and that the process for doing so is clear and
straightforward.
Case Similar to Cases at Firms: ex. BCG, Bain Final Round (MBA) Level
Prompt: Our client is an Australian mining company, whose main product is Iron Ore,
which it sells exclusively to China. This company is the largest producer in volume
in this market with 230 million tons sold each year. It is also the lowest cost
producer at 27$ per ton of production costs. We estimate the total Chinese
demand for Iron Ore today to be around 980 million tons per year. Our client has
won a concession to mine a new site adjacent to its biggest mine, and
increases production to 360 million tons per year (i.e. 130 million additional
tons per year). Is this worth doing?
Are there are any company criteria to approve projects? Board typically approves projects with payback in less than
What typically constitutes success? 5 years. You can use payback with no discounting for your
math.
How is the market expected to grow? Consider that the market will remain flat at 980 million
tons per year for the foreseeable future
How much upfront investment will be required for this $ 3 Billion upfront
project?
What is the cost of this new volume of production? Are Consider this new mine to have the same exact cost as its
there cost synergies or is this a more expensive mine? current production (27$/ton)
How does the competitive landscape look like? Show Exhibit A of China’s Cash-Cost curve for iron ore.
Should we consider the possibility of international For the purposes of this case, let’s limit analysis to iron ore
expansion or new minerals? and China.
China’s 2015 Iron Ore Supply CFR Costs (including Royalties & Ocean Freight)
US$ / ton
A Competitor
(our client) B
• From exhibit A, interviewee should be able to extract that current equilibrium price of iron
ore is at 60$/ton (this is where the line x = 980 intersects the curve)
• Explanation: since product is a commodity, and market is perfectly competitive,
price is defined by the market. Price therefore converges to the lowest possible
that allows 980 Mty demand to be met. From exhibit A, it’s clear that everyone
below 60 $/ton can service the market, and the rest is currently not playing.
• Interviewee notes that by adding 130 Mty, price will drop. Referring to chart, the last 130
Mty to the left of the x = 980 line will be pushed to the right, and out of the market. The
new equilibrium price is where the curve meets x = 850 (980 -130), which corresponds
roughly to 50 $/ton.
• Interviewee calculates pay-off per year and payback period:
• New profit = 360 Mty * (50$ - 27$) = $ 8280 MM per year
• Old profit = 230 Mty * (60$ - 27$) = $ 7590 MM per year
• Delta profit = $8280 - $7590 = $690 MM per year
• Payback = = $ 3 Bn / ($ 0.69 MM per year) = ~ 4 years (under 5 year threshold)
• Interviewee should assess that competitor B will lose $10 margin ($60 - $50 price drop),
and therefore a total of $10 * 190 Mty (production of B from chart) = $1.9 Bn per year.
• Interviewee should consider a few options that competitor B has:
• Competitor B can increase his production if he has access to new mines (price will
drop even further, but perhaps volume increase will compensate)
• Competitor B can temporarily reduce production to make prices go up again
• Competitor B can work to reduce costs
• Competitor B can assess M&A options (e.g. Higher cost players that are looking to
sell, and can potentially have synergies with B’s current operations)
• Interviewee should be able to assess that given the four pay-off scenarios there is only one
dominant strategy for client A: expand. (see example of illustration in the next slide)
0 - $1.9 B
- $1.15B -$0.39B
Expand
* *
Dominant strategy for A
* Calculation of competitor B pay-offs can be calculated from case data, but are not relevant
to decision
KNOWLEDGE FOR ACTION
CASE 10
Phighting Phillies
Prompt: Our client, Alpha Capital, is a private equity firm that is considering buying the
Philadelphia Phillies. The current team owners approached Alpha about
purchasing the team for $1.1B. Alpha engaged our firm in the due diligence
process and wants us to help them understand:
A. What is the team worth?
B. Should they make this investment?
Clarifying Questions
Sample Clarifying Questions and Answers
Fund structure, previous investments This asset will go into a new fund without hold period constraints or
previous investments
Hurdle rates, hold periods, other constraints Assume these are not major issues
Impetus / motivation for the deal? We want to maximize our investment. Also assume that fund
leadership is filled with avid Phillies fans who want the team to be
successful
How does the team make money? [Before answering, ask the interviewee to brainstorm some ideas]
The major revenue streams are: ticket sales, concessions,
merchandise, media rights, and advertising/ sponsorships
What are the major cost drivers? [Before answering, ask the interviewee to brainstorm some ideas]
The major cost drivers are: Player salaries, front office costs, sales
& advertising, and stadium/facilities costs
Does the team own or lease its stadium and other facilities? Assume the city of Philadelphia owns these and we are paying
annual leasing costs.
Should we be considering revenues and costs associated with Spring Great question, but let’s not consider these in our analysis
Training and the farm system?
Are there other potential bidders for the team? Assume there are not other bidders and we have the first shot at
buying the team.
Sample Framework
• Key Points of background • Should Alpha make the investment?
o Fund structure and previous investments o Management Team Considerations
o Hurdle rates, hold periods and other constraints ▪ Existing team management quality?
o Deal thesis and motivation ▪ Would we have to replace management
o Ability to Execute
• How much is the team worth? ▪ Asking price below our valuation?
o + Revenues ▪ Do we have access to capital to purchase the
▪ Ticket Sales team?
▪ Concessions ▪ Our expertise in running a sports business
▪ Merchandise enterprise
▪ Media Rights ▪ Ability to achieve synergies we identify?
▪ Sponsorships and Ads o Other Factors
o - Costs ▪ Fan-base reaction to PE buyer?
▪ Player Salaries ▪ League approval of our purchase?
▪ Front Office Costs ▪ Potential tension between maximizing the
▪ SG&A investment and winning?
▪ Stadium and Facility Costs ▪ Regulatory/legal risks?
▪ COGS/Other ▪ Risks to sport of baseball (e.g., lower fan interest)
o Potential Revenue and Cost Synergies ▪ Other investments we could make with better ROI?
▪ Expected Increased Revenues
▪ Expected Lower Costs
o Discount Cash Flows
Costs
Information for Interviewee Cost Size (Keep Private)
Player Salaries $110M $ 110,000,000
Front Office Costs $20M $ 20,000,000
Sales & Advertising $50M $ 50,000,000
Stadium/Facility Costs $20M $ 20,000,000
Total Costs $ 200,000,000
Valuation
Revenue $ 300,000,000
Costs $ 200,000,000
Annual EBIT $ 100,000,000
Taxes Assume $0
Discount Rate 10%
Valuation $ 1,000,000,000
Note for Interviewer: At this point, the candidate should see that the valuation is less than the
asking price. If necessary, prompt the interviewer to compare this value to the asking price. If they
do not bring up synergies, guide them to this topic.
See below for calculations on potential synergies and associated impact on the valuation.
Impact on Valuation
Total Cost Synergies $ 10,000,000
Total Revenue Synergies $ 30,000,000
Total Synergies $ 40,000,000
Valuation Impact $ 400,000,000
New Total Valuation $ 1,400,000,000
5%
4%
$160
4%
3% $120
3%
2% $80
2%
1% $40
1%
0% $-
Dynamic Ticket Renegotiated Attract Higher Revamped Phillies Costs League Benchmark
Pricing Local Media Deal Value Sponsors Concessions
Player Salaries Front Office Costs
Offerings
Sales & Advertising Stadium/Facility Costs
Other Considerations
Note for Interviewer: If the candidate does not drive us to the “other considerations” bucket,
ask them what other types of factors they would want to consider in deciding whether to
recommend that Alpha buys the team. See below for some example considerations.
Wrap-Up
The MD at Alpha Capital is walking down the hallway and she wants to know what
our initial findings and recommendations are. What do you tell her?
Note for Interviewer: This case hinges on the candidate realizing that revenue and cost
synergies are required to make this a viable investment. Strong math skills are required,
including intuition around the synergies. The candidate could use the prompt to underpin a
strong framework (a pre-packaged framework will likely lead to problems. Finally, strong
candidates will continue to drive the case throughout, particularly moving from a basic financial
analysis to a discussion of the other considerations.
Prompt: The Indian insurance market is heavily underpenetrated. The majority of insurable, adult population either is not
insured and this has serious consequences – when financial adversity strikes, such as when the main breadwinner of a
family dies, or if there is a drought or a flood, people either find it hard to survive or in some cases also commit suicide.
When we say insurance, we think of both life insurance and non-life insurance such as health, crop, etc. The distinction is
not important for the purposes of our case.
The government of India is thinking of using the Indian postal network as a creative way of reaching the underserved insurance
population. The infrastructure already exists and this can be leveraged for distributing much-needed insurance products. The
objective would be to provide a safety net to as many people as possible in the underserved markets. To answer this case, the
interviewer should ask the following questions (sequentially and as they come out in conversation)
Sample Clarifying Questions and Answers (answered for each of the questions separately)
Q2: Market Sizing See slides
If you wish, and if time permits, you can why % of income willing to spend on insurance decreases as income increases? Because
insurance needs are non-linear; for every 10% increase in income, you don't need to have a 10% increase in insurance; so if you earn
more money, you can get away with spending less for insurance
Solution:
Solution:
Prompt: Our client is the United States Department of the Interior, which is responsible for the
National Park Service (“NPS”). The NPS employs park rangers across all federally owned
parks, ranging from Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon to the Statue of Liberty and Lincoln
Memorial.
The client is concerned that job retention is low among the Law Enforcement rangers.
They would like you to explore how big the problem is and think about ways to improve it.
Note to Interviewer: “Great” response should have a structure and include 4-5 ideas about
potential costs. If interviewee only comes up with 1-3 ideas, keep pushing them by asking “what
else?”
Prompt to read: We have some figures on what the retention problem looks like across the four
different types of rangers nationally and what the associated costs are. Please calculate what
percent of each type of ranger left in 2016 and what the total costs were per group.
Note to Interviewer: Recommended for interviewee to round figures for easier calculation. A “great”
response will include a “so what” about these figures. Some insights include: lowest overall number of
rangers are leaving from Law Enforcement, but these impose by far the highest cost and thus should
be prioritized in the solution. While the same % of education rangers leave, they impose roughly 30%
of the same total cost. Maintenance and Administrative rangers should be deprioritized in the solution.
Prompt: The government conducted a survey among Law Enforcement Rangers and found that
their pain points exist across three areas. Family Friendliness, Effective Senior Leadership, and
Performance-Based Rewards. Can you brainstorm some solutions to retention within these
areas?
Note to Interviewer: Below find descriptions of each category. Only read if asked for definitions
of interviewee:
1) “Family Friendliness”: Degree to which the organization is family friendly (ex. some rangers are sometimes
expected to move across the country to middle of nowhere, might not have access to schooling)
2) Effective Senior Leadership: Degree to which park Superintendents have the proper background and
experience to lead. Note that most superintendents have a background as Education rangers.
3) Performance-Based Rewards: Degree to which rangers receive the right level and mix of benefits (note: while
rangers are not primarily motivated by money, they noticed that pay is higher at other government organizations
and these organizations also pay overtime, which the NPS rangers don’t receive).
Family-Friendliness
- Better matching between rangers and assignments
- Institute matching based on performance of rangers
- Source rangers from local areas rather than require them to move/travel
- Online tutoring for children of rangers
Performance-Based Rewards
- Improve benefits: salary, travel, health insurance, etc.
- Implement overtime
Note to Interviewer: A “good” response will be structured into the buckets given and will include at least 2-3
ideas per bucket. A “great” response will include a high-level discussion/acknowledgement of the costs
associated with these solutions and will include a hypothesis of what the best solutions would be.
Prompt: The Director of the National Parks Service just stepped into the room
and would like you to summarize what we’ve discussed.
Note to Interviewer: A “great” response will primarily address the main question of
retention among Law Enforcement rangers (rather than get off topic). It will explain
the problem (high costs associated with lost Law Enforcement Rangers), include a
potential solution (1-2 ideas to explore), and discuss next steps (e.g. look into
associated costs of potential solutions).
Prompt: Our client is Caesars, one of the largest gaming and resort companies in the
world. Penn and Teller have been the headlining show at the Rio Hotel since
2001, and they are currently the longest-running headlining show in Vegas
history. Caesars, who owns the Rio Hotel where the duo performs in the 1500
seat P&T Theater, is wondering if their act has become stale. Penn & Teller's
annual contract is about to expire, before Caesars has a meeting with the duo
they have asked our company's advice on whether or not to resign the act for
another year.
•This case a typical Profits case. We suggest you guide the case to consider the
revenues, then costs, then profits.
•Time permitting, continue on to the brainstorming question and payback period.
•Continually push the interviewee to consider the Vegas landscape (highly
competitive) and use Vegas, entertainment, and live-show related terminology
(patrons in seats not customers buying widgets).
What goal does Caesars have? As one of the largest entertainment companies
on the Strip and around the world, Caesars solely cares about the company’s total
bottom line profitability.
How long is a contract for Penn & Teller?: As is the Vegas standard, all contracts
are for a one-year time period.
Why does Caesars think the show is stale? The show has plateaued, with no
change in bottom line profitability in the past five years.
Other Sources
Keys to a Strong Framework
From P&T
of Company π • Does it go “three levels
deep”?
Revenues Costs ∆ Hotel Stays • Does it use case-specific
terminology (seats & ticket
Ticket Costs Patrons Fixed Variable ∆ Dining versus quantity)?
• Does it consider the
Pricing Seats Available MKTG Magic Props
∆ company’s bottom line and
Casino/Gaming
not just P&T?
Seats Full SG&A Housekeeping ∆ Drinks
• Does it consider sources of
revenue beyond tickets
Annual
sold (concessions,
Segments Playbills ∆ Souvenirs
Contracts overnight guests, casino
spend)?
Insurance Ushers ∆ Concessions
• Is it MECE?
Stage Crew
Utilities
$95K 6 40 $22.8M
Keep in mind
• Is the math done organized?
• Are math shortcuts used?
• Are units maintained (thousands, millions)?
• What are the costs to putting on the show? Costs are broken into six main
buckets. Both Penn and Teller each make $2M per year. The Crew (stagehands,
showgirls, ushers) in total costs $2K per show. Housekeeping costs $1000 per
week. The Props (the doves, playing cards, etc) costs $200 per show. Utilities
(the lights) cost $52K per year. SG&A (Marketing, box office staff, etc) costs
$15K per month.
• Does housekeeping clean year round? No, they are only needed the 40
weeks the show is live.
• Is SG&A paid year round? Yes, that is a 12 month per year expense.
• How have costs changed? These costs have been static over the past 5+
years.
Cost/yr $4,800,000
Keep in mind
• Are numbers converted to a common cost unit?
• Is the math done organized?
• Are math shortcuts used?
• Are units maintained (thousands, millions)?
What goal does Caesars have? As one of the largest entertainment companies on the Strip
and around the world, Caesars solely cares about the company’s total bottom line profitability.
How long is a contract for the AGT winner?: As is the Vegas standard, all contracts are for a
one-year time period.
Are there any costs to making the switch? Putting in a new show will require a
reconfiguration of the theater and a one-time marketing blitz. This would cost $2.4M to do and
would occur before the first show.
What are the revenues of the new show? The new show would bring in only $90K in ticket
sales per show (compared to P&T of $95K). All other sources of revenue (gaming, concessions,
etc) are insignificant.
What are the costs of the new show? The new show would cost significantly less than the
P&T, costing $3M per year as opposed to $4.8M.
Yes No
Topics Tested: mathematical calculation, business strategy brainstorm for unique industry
Prompt: Your client is Mark Bellissimo, CEO of Wellington Equestrian Partners (WEP). Mark, a
Harvard MBA with no background in the equestrian industry aside from watching his
daughters ride at competitions, created WEP in 2006 with the mission of transforming
Wellington, FL from a town with a large horse show to a community with a vibrant equestrian
industry. As of now, Mark has succeeded in creating an incredible competition circuit in FL
(called the Winter Equestrian Festival) and is seeking an investment from a reputable
investment firm. In order to do so, he needs to 1. assess the total economic impact the
festival has on the community each year, and b. brainstorm ways to expand his business that
the investor might be excited about. You have been asked to assist Mark with this analysis
and with crafting a 60 second pitch, that includes expansion plans, for the outside investor.
(For context, top riders and trainers from around the world come to Wellington, FL for
12 weeks every winter to compete against elite competition and avoid the cold weather. You
can think of this like you would any other sporting league/venue with on and off seasons.)
Framework
Economic impact calculation (candidate should identify factors that would contribute to the
economic impact from this sporting event):
• Suggestions should be organized and include both short and long-term options
• Should mention a method for evaluation
• Creativity is encouraged
• Should note risks
• Identification that this sport is not unlike any other local, seasonal sporting event is key
Sources:
http://www.wellingtonfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=8808
http://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/business/equestrian-sports-festival-110-million-boon-for-county-tourism/zo92iudwRHHX0D9hzVXRyO/
Expansion Plans (1 of 2)
Candidate should brainstorm ways to expand business offerings; suggestions should be
organized and include both short and long-term options; creativity is encouraged; a
method for evaluation should be mentioned; risks should be noted; identification that this
sport is not unlike any other local, seasonal sporting event is key; note, all of these ideas
are ones that Mark has actually implemented in some capacity in real life
• Internal strategies:
• Expand festival past 12 weeks: more weeks = more revenue
• Risk: loss of prestige
• Offer multiple festivals past 12 weeks: more weeks = more revenue
• Risk: what is competitive landscape at different times in year?
• Repurpose venue for other events during off-seasons (concerns, sports, etc.)
• Risk: expensive and potentially damaging to property
• Increase number of exhibitors: make venue as competition-friendly as possible
through enhanced quality (horse-friendly conditions)
• Risk: expensive so entry fees might need to increase
• Increase spectator attendance: make sport accessible to local community (food,
carnivals for kids, instructional pamphlets, access to parking, advertising, etc.)
• Risk: success rate - will people come?
• Acquire more property in surrounding neighborhoods: expand venue
• Risk: will acquisitions lead to more profit?
Expansion Plans (2 of 2)
• External strategies:
• Partner with local hotels & tourism board to increase traffic to city: attract more out-
of-towners, ensure all people can be accommodated in existing or new hotels
• Risk: increased traffic does not lead to increased festival revenue
• Attract media attention: more attention for sport = more spectators and future
participants (NBC Sports)
• Risk: media gets involved and viewership is not interested; irreparable
reputational damage
• Increase sponsorship: pull in sponsors who target equestrian demographics (Rolex,
Fidelity Investments)
• Risk: sport appears too elite for average consumer
• Partner with schools and riding academies to encourage sport participation:
increasing the market size of sport should increase profits of companies within sport
• Risk: target population won’t compete at high level for many years
• Offer other companies encouragements to promote festival
• Risk: what is success rate of these details?
• Expand to new locations
• Risk: expensive and what does competition look like?
• Expand into different industries
• Risk: does WEP have qualifications to do so?
Final Pitch
A successful pitch includes both an answer to the economic impact question
as well as some well thought out suggestions for Mark.
The Winter Equestrian Festival that WEP hosts every year contributes over $112.5 million
annually to the local economy through current revenue streams. WEP could increase this
number through some exciting new initiatives including offering multiple festivals throughout the
year, partnering with the local community to increase spectator attendance, and expanding to
new locations. These changes will increase market share within the equestrian industry, making
WEP ready for an investment. Risks would include that the expensive expansion plans do not
lead to converted sales and how your competitors respond, but we believe you can mitigate
these risks given your dominant market position. Some next steps would be to assess the
market share potential in other locations and survey your current competitors for their
willingness to return to Florida multiple times a year. Overall, WEP is ready to secure this
investment.
Prompt: Our client, Medical Devices Co., is a medical device company that manufactures a blood
clotting product called BloodStopper. This product is currently sold in liquid vials. The
product is typically applied with a sponge during post-op. Medical Devices is considering a
deal with a sponge manufacturer named Spongy’s to create a hybrid product that combines a
sponge with the BloodStopper product. The combined product will include BloodStopper in
a dry, tablet form. Spongy’s will sell the final product.
Should Medical Devices do a deal with Spongy’s? If so, what terms should they negotiate?
For Interviewer:
This case has three main components -
1. Analysis to determine the potential price of the new combined product
2. Analysis to determine how the cost structure for the combined product would change
from the original products, and what difference that makes for each company’s margin
3. Brainstorm/conclusion on how the deal should be structured given (1) and (2)
A. Consumers - Who are they? Where, and how many? What benefit does the combined product provide
to consumers versus the original liquid vial? What is the WTP for liquid vial and the sponge
independently? What is the WTP for the combined product?
A. Product – Does Medical Device Co. own the IP on BloodStopper? Is there anything “unique” about the
sponge? What is the difference in cost between the liquid form and tablet form of BloodStopper? What
are the margins on the sponge? What are the margins for each player in the combined product?
A. Competition – Are there other companies making a product like BloodStopper? What are the barriers to
entry? Are there other sponge manufacturers?
A. Deal Structure – Should Medical Device Co. proceed by selling to Spongy’s, seek out a different
partner, or restructure the arrangement?
Cost Breakdown
The costs to Medical Device Co. for the BloodStopper product in the original liquid
vial form versus in tablet form are as follows:
Per Unit
BloodStopper BloodStopper
Liquid Vial Tablet Form
Cost of Goods Sold
Raw materials $1.00 $0.90
Manufacturing $0.25 $0.20
Packaging $0.15 $0.10
Direct Labor $2.10 $1.80
C. Competition – Candidate should recognize that BloodStopper is not in a competitive market, while
Spongy’s product is common enough that there are several players.
Candidate sample questions: Are there other companies making a product like BloodStopper? What are the
barriers to entry? Are there other sponge manufacturers?
D. Deal Structure – Ask the candidate if current deal structure makes sense, and what could be some
alternatives?
● Current deal – Could be a challenge since Spongy’s would have such a high COGS if Medical Devic Co.
maintains its margin
● Vertical integration – Who should buy whom? Why?
○ Given that Medical Device has much higher margins and a more “special” product,
● Volume-based discounting – Incentivizes Spongy’s to push sales
● Revenue Sharing – Implement thresholds to encourage sales
Conclusion
Should Medical Device Co. sell their product to Spongy’s, and if so how?
Sample Conclusion: Medical Device Co. should not do the do the deal as proposed. For Medical Device Co. to
maintain its $80 margin per product, Spongy’s would have to assume a high COGS and would realize a much
lower profit than Medical Device Co. This could put Medical Device Co. at risk of not having the improved
access to marketing and distribution channels partially intended by going into business with Spongy’s. As an
alternative, Medical Device Co. should plan to vertically integrate by buying the sponges from Spongy’s or
acquiring another sponge manufacturer, since there are numerous potential targets and Medical Device Co.
has a stronger financial position relative to Spongy’s.
A strong conclusion:
● Recognizes current deal economics may not favor Spongy’s as end distributor of the product
● Proposes alternative deal structure and puts forth the “why?”
Vivid’s main product is HDTV (high definition TV) screens. Its main
customers are well-known TV manufacturers in Asia and the US, who buy other
components, build the finished TVs and sell them to retailers who use global
distribution channels to reach the end-users.
You have been assigned to this team and today is your first meeting with the
project manager to review the information collected and brainstorm about key
hypotheses.
-Comparative
-Price metric -Discounting policy -WTP -Substitutes
pricing/benchmarking
-Price level -Sales incentives -Supply chain
-Quantity -Sales KPIs -Suppliers
-Cost -Switching costs
Is Vivid concerned about profitability, or just revenue? The client is looking at pricing in search of opportunities to grow
revenue.
Are there patents in place? Vivid technology is patent-protected, and for manufacturers to
switch suppliers would require costly plant reconfiguration.
Has revenue been declining year-over-year? While sales volumes have been increasing, revenue has remained
flat.
Are competitors’ experiencing the same revenue decline? Unfortunately, we don’t have financials for any of the competitors.
Notes for the interviewer: below are a sample list of data types the candidate
might ask for. As he/she mentions them, probe them to explain why. Once they’ve
run out of ideas, proceed to the first data prompt.
Example answers:
Production costs Customer feedback
5500
5000
4500
4000
Volume (units)
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
50% 45% 40% 35%
Discount (%)
Solution:
(A) (B) (C)
List price * (1-disc) = Selling price Volume * Price = Tot. Rev Total Rev / Volume = Avg Price
$400 * 50% = $ 200 3,000 * $200 = $600K
$2,280K/10K = $228/unit
$400 * 45% = $ 220 1,000 * $220 = $220K
$400 * 40% = $ 240 5,000 * $240 = $1,200K
$400 * 35% = $ 260 1,000 * $260 = $260K
$2,280K
Supplier Vivid
(backlighting) (screens) TV Manuf Retailer
Cost: $200 $200 $300 $150
With the information we’ve gathered so far, what can you tell me about the
distribution of surplus (profit) in the supply chain, and the TV manufacturer’s
willingness to pay for Vivid’s TV screens?
Supplier Vivid
(backlighting) (screens) TV Manuf Retailer
Cost: $200 $200 $300 $150
Solution:
(A) (B)
Sum known SC components Retail price – subtotal =
Avg Price – Cost = Profit Manuf. profit
$200 + $20 = $220
$228 - $200 = $ 28 $1,000 – 928 = $72
$200 + $28 = $228
$300 + ___ = $300
$150 + $30 = $180
Subtotal: $928
Wrap-up
Prompt: Your team is on the weekly update call with Vivid’s CEO and she wants to
get straight to the point. What did you find in the data? What are the action items?
The project manager nods your way. Go.
Wrap-up
Example Key takeaways (cont’d):
• Value Chain: There is $100 of surplus to be split among the TV manufacturer
and Vivid. Right now Vivid is getting ~$28 of that pie. That could be viewed as
good, given the fact that other suppliers make only $20 profit, but on the other
hand, customers have a very high opinion of the value of the screens and have
high switching costs. Vivid should target a price increase. (A $40/$60 split of
the surplus offers the most compelling message, as both players would then
have 20% return on sales. This would mean a Vivid ASP of $240).
Prompt: Our Client, Home Inspection Co., is a third party independent home
inspection company who conducts the inspections after a home is sold. They
currently operate out of Ohio, and they have hired us to help them figure out if
they should expand to more states, and if so, which state(s) and how?
Clarifying Questions
Location Options: Business Related: Competition or Other Concerns:
Have they looked at any states right How much revenue does Home Ins. Any regulatory concerns? Typically
now? Narrowed down to Colorado Co do now? $10 million gov’t run, but MI allowed 3rd party 10
and Michigan years ago and CO was 2 ½ years ago
How many states can they expand to What is their basis for wanting to MI only allows 20% of their market to
right now? Only could expand to one move? Increasing top line revenue be inspected by 3rd party and
Colorado is 50%.
Is market size growing, shrinking,? What type of inspections do they Competition: the longer 3rd party has
Relatively flat do? Any house that are single family been allowed, the more competition
homes only so MI has many competitors, and CO
has few competitors
Framework
After asking about some of the clarifying questions on the previous page, a strong
framework would be to analyze the Colorado market (market size, competition,
distribution options) and the Michigan market (market size, competition, distribution
options). As part of this, they should think about market entry and how to attack
that aspect of the question along with some of the risks associated with it.
In order to conduct the analysis on the next few slides, the interviewee will need to
have all the information pieces on the math slide (bolded columns). If they do not
ask for it, prompt them in order from top to bottom. If the case is running long, you
can skip the government limitations addition to the case.
• If short on time, final answer is $60 million per year. Significantly larger than annual
revenue of overall company and move to quick market entry option on next slide and
then on the next state.
• If time, work through additional part about government regulations ($60 million * 50%
limit = $30 mil) and market entry options on next slide. True opportunity for Home
Inspectors for Colorado is $30 million.
• If short on time, final answer is $100 million per year. Significantly larger than annual
revenue of overall company.
• If there is enough time, work through additional part about government regulations
($100 million * 20% limit = $20 mil) and below market entry options. True opportunity
for Home Inspectors for Michigan is $20 million.
• Competitors:
• Ask interviewee to think of competition in this market.
• As independent inspectors have been allowed for 10 years, this has
allowed enough time for many competitors, and they have covered the
majority of market at this point.
• Since many competitors, could be tough market, but since it is geographically
next to Ohio, could work with southern Michigan. This would decrease set up
costs & training because you could reassign employees in current office.
# of households 2.5 people per house 2 mil houses 2.5 people per house 4 mil houses
Home inspection frequency 1 house every 9 years 200,000/yr 1 house every 12 years 250,000/yr
Cost of inspection $300 per inspection $60 million $400 per inspection $100 million
Recommendation
Recommendation:
• Should Home Inspectors Expand: Yes and where (see below for two options):
For Colorado:
• Opportunities: $30 million yearly opportunity with very few competitors.
• Risks: Some of the risks could be geographic distance to set up office and hire new
employees, and potential changes in regulations similar to Michigan.
• Next steps: Scout the area of Colorado to see where the competitors are set up and
where we could put an optimal office location.
For Michigan:
• Opportunities: $20 million yearly opportunity with closer geographic location than
CO.
• Risks: Market saturation already, regulation changes to limit 3rd party inspectors, and
change in market demand due to MI economy.
• Next steps: Scout the area of Michigan to see if a natural expansion into Southern
Michigan is plausible or if company would need to get new office location in Michigan.