0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views2 pages

Denmark

mun

Uploaded by

vani.gera2008
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views2 pages

Denmark

mun

Uploaded by

vani.gera2008
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Denmark

Allies:
1. Norway
2. Sweden
3. Finland
4. Iceland
5. Germany
6. United Kingdom
7. United States
8. Netherlands
9. Belgium
10.France

Syria
No one leaves a home, unless the home is a mouth of a shark

Denmark has therefore decided to increase its humanitarian aid to the


Palestinian civilian population, particularly in Gaza, by 75 million Danish
kroner (approx. 10 million euro).

The new DKK 75 million (approx. EURO 10 million) humanitarian aid package
will be distributed between the following organisations:

UNICEF (DKK 30 million, approx. EURO 4 million): Focus on protection of


children, access to clean water and hygiene.

WFP (DKK 20 million, approx. EURO 2.7 million): Focus on food efforts and
logistics.

ICRC (DKK 16 million, approx. EURO 2.1 million): Focus on the supply of
medicine, medical equipment and medical treatment.
The aid package comes in addition to the Danish Government's previous
announcement of extraordinary humanitarian aid to Palestine, and brings the total
humanitarian contribution to Palestine since the beginning of the conflict on 7
October to DKK 125 million (approx. EURO 16.7 million).

 situations of discrimination can get created against certain groups of


refugees in contravention of Article 3 of the Refugee Convention of
1951 and Article 2 and 22 of the Convention of the Rights of the Child
 is unfair to the Member States which do uphold standards and will
lead to increased responsibility for these states aslack of respect for
the standards of EU and international law will create a push factor;
 does nothing to address the situation of ‘instrumentalisation’ by third
countries, instead it targets people seeking protection, themselves
victims of such actions
 will lead to the erosion of the Common European Asylum System
which already suffers from widespread non-compliance which largely
goes unpunished.
 PROHIBITION OF EXPULSION OR RETURN in the international
refugee law puts a restraint on the contracting state which has granted
refuge to the refugees, such a state could not force the refugee to return to
the state where the atrocities of crimes against humanity would be inflicted
on him. Article 33(1) basically lays a general rule whose exception is
granted in Article 33(2). A refugee would fail to fall under the general
mandate if reasonable and diligent grounds have been provided that the
refugee who has been convicted by final judgment for particularly a serious
crime and there is a danger that he may threaten the security of the country
he has been convicted in, he could be expelled by the country he is
apparently residing in and he could not avail the benefit of the principle of
Non-Refoulement.
 Article 33 (2) does not really require a strict proof in regard to the refugees
being a danger to the national security. This provision applies to ‘a refugee
whom there are reasonable grounds for- such a danger.’ The decision
whether the refugee is of ‘such a danger’ status, is subjective to each case
and it must be left to the discretion of the state to decide. The word “danger”
in clause 2 comprises of danger in the present or in the future. In interpreting
the term “security of the country”, it is deduced clearly that if a person is
engaged in activities aiming at facilitating the conquest of the country where
he is staying or a part of the country, by another stare, he is threatening the
security of the former country. This termed in rather invokes against the acts
of grave kind which directly or indirectly the constitution or the government
t, the territorial integrity, the independence or external peace of the country
concerned. It may not harm in any circumstance, the external sovereignty of
the country.

You might also like