00 Prelim 2002
00 Prelim 2002
00 Prelim 2002
The views expressed in the report are those of the individual authors and not the institutions they are affiliated to.
INDIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT 2003
Governance Issues for Commercialization
3iNetwork
Infrastructure Development Finance Company
Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
1
FOREWORD
Three years ago when the 3iNetwork produced the first of the infrastructure reports, I was less than sanguine that we
would be able to sustain an annual series of substantive reports on particular thematic areas affecting infrastructure
development. It is with great pleasure and satisfaction that over time, we have tried to tackle increasingly difficult issues.
India Infrastructure Report 2003 (IIR 2003) has taken the theme ‘Public Expenditure Allocation and Accountability’
reflecting the unchanging manner that India has chosen over decades to control the allocation of public resources. This
is, perhaps, the single most important systemic change that we need to engineer to usher in an investment climate that
helps investors, both, public and private, and operators to emerge.
IIR 2003 emphasizes how central, state and local governments decide on public investments to be made on infrastructure
projects within their jurisdiction and trace the consequences of these decisions. While the traditional process of budget
preparation at all three levels plays an important part in infrastructure spending, a number of papers in this report suggest
that after the expenditure is budgeted there is little monitoring of investments or measurement of outcomes to gauge the
efficiency and efficacy of those investments. This arises despite the fact that the Comptroller and Auditor General which
is the primary watchdog of government expenditure and, more recently, the Expenditure Commission have made many
observations related to these expenditures.
Unless we can create framework conditions for the efficiency of investments in infrastructure, both public and private,
with a speed of application in an environment of relative stability and clarity we will not be able to solve some of the
most important issues in infrastructure investments this country has yet to make. This is why we have concentrated on
trying to understand the shortcomings of present methodologies of making public investments especially in the infrastructure
sector. Infrastructure makes up a large portion of public expenditure and success here can provide a fillip to economic
growth. If this can be work out, more sophisticated techniques for infrastructure finance will evolve over time. We feel
that this theme is so fundamental to arriving at the right policies that we have embarked on looking at how government
expenditure in infrastructure can be better spent. Much research needs to be done and important work is currently in
progress.
IIR 2003, like its predecessors, is the joint effort of many practitioners, researchers, policy makers, and teachers. IDFC’s
role in the 3iNetwork is to facilitate current thinking on issues related to all aspects of infrastructure investments and
to provide strong inputs into underlying thematic concerns. Unless we get the big picture right we cannot embellish it
in a thousand different ways. In matters such as these there is always room for differences. We strongly believe that
sustainable frameworks can only be built through such free exchange of ideas and opinions. We do not necessarily subscribe
to every point of view expressed by the many contributors to this volume, but we do believe that a platform for sharing
these approaches in the interests of open debate is necessary for real solutions to emerge that will benefit the public at
large. Our focus of attention is to find solutions to vexing questions so that real progress can be made on the ground
as quickly as possible.
Apart from this annual report, the network has also undertaken several projects and is currently examining some key
issues in infrastructure governance. The network has contributed to technical issues for electricity regulation especially
with respect to power distribution and transmission; developed software tools to assess the environmental impact of coal
based power plants, and is making progress on projects such as inter-city comparisons of service quality and evaluation
of performance in road concessions. This software is available on the network’s web site at www.3iNetwork.org.
vi Foreword
I would like to thank our publishers the Oxford University Press who have played an important role in making these
reports available all over the world at an affordable price.
I am sure that those interested in the subject will find IIR 2003 as informative as the earlier two. Clearly the foundations
for a very different operating environment in infrastructure development are being created piece by piece and very shortly
we will see the fruits of these efforts.
Nasser Munjee
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Almost twenty years ago when I began my career as a journalist for Business India, I had to study the milk business and
the valiant efforts made by the National Dairy Development Board to take Operation Flood further in Bihar. I then came
face to face with government corruption and mismanagement of expenditure in that state. The spending departments such
as the PWD had to bribe the revenue departments to release funds! A part of that corruption finally blew up into the
fodder scam which involved the emasculation of at least three levels of governance. However, it is interesting that due
to the NDDB’s efforts to put through a correctly designed programme for change milk is plentiful and the market grew
to take developments further. The anger and shock of those days has remained with me although I believe I now have
a better understanding on why governments and bureaucracies behave the way they do. For change to take place, one
needs to understand and discover the key ‘leverage points for change’—not an easy task when the subjects are the government
and the economy.
When Nasser Munjee put forward the idea of focusing this report on public expenditure accountability, it appeared
to be the next logical step to the discussion on governance covered in the last report. For many of us it was an opportunity
to again look at the systemic aspects of governments functioning, developing our own understanding as we went along.
The topic necessarily involved public finance, even though the intention was to go beyond traditional, public finance to
look at the expenditure and budgetary processes uncovering the dysfunctionalities. We expanded the 3iNetwork to include
people and institutions with greater experience than the original three institutional members. This report covers interesting
issues missed in public discussions on the topic of public expenditure management. We thank Nasser Munjee, Anupam
Rastogi, and Partha Mukhopadhayay of the IDFC for supporting us so fully. We have suggested that the solution to bringing
about accountability in public expenditure management lies in bringing in the private sector, citizens and consumers of
public services, in ways that still need to be recognised, designed and crafted. To discuss the problem meaningfully we
had to go into the macroeconomic environment and the domain of the governmental and organizational processes and
the adherence to laws and contracts. We thank our readers from the more narrow field of infrastructure development for
their bearing with us on this broader area, because we are convinced that lasting change has necessary to be systemic and
institutionalised.
Our brainstorming sessions held in Mumbai brought out interesting ideas. We are grateful to all the participants of
IDFC. We thank all the discussants. The subsequent writers’ workshop to discuss the papers was held at Lonvala. We
thank the HDFC Centre for taking good care of us.
We thank the following for their formal and informal communication which in some manner influenced the course
and content of the report—A Vaidyanathan, A.K. Mittal, Abha Singhal Joshi, Abhay Pethe, Aditi Joshi, Ajay Narayan,
Ajay Pandey, Ajay Shankar, Ajit Karnik, Alice Albin Morris, Alice George, Amit Sadhu, Amita Shah, Anoop Singh, Anoop
Seth, Ashima Goyal, Atanu Chakraborty, B.P. Pundhir, B.R. Marwah, Bharti Solanky, Bimal Giri, Binayak Rath, Bithin
Datta, Brij Kothari, Cherian Thomas, Deepa Khekani, Dheeraj Sanghi, Dilip Karmarkar, Dinesh Awasthi, Errol D’Souza,
G. Raghuram, Gajendra Haldea, Geetam Tiwari, Indira Ananth, Jahar Saha, Jayanth Rama Varma, Jeemol Unni, Jerome
Morris, Keshab Das, Krishnan Venkataraman, M.H. Jowher, M.P. Mathur, M.Y. Rao, Madhurima Bansal, Mahender
Gujarathi, Mahendra Dev, Mahesh Vyas, Mukesh Sharma, P.K. Taneja, Piyush Joshi, Prem Kalra, Priya Mathur, R. Nagaraj,
R.V. Anuradha, Rajiv Shekhar, Rakesh Basant, Ravi Saxena, Ravikant Joshi, Rekha Jain, Riddhi Barman, S. Manikutty,
S. Sriraman, S.K. Barua, Sadashiv Rao, Sandeep R Bharatwaj, Satyananda Sahoo, Saumyen Guha, Shantanu Mitra, Sidharth
viii Acknowledgements
Sinha, T. Janodia, T. Madhavan, T.V. Ramanayya, Tapas K Sen, U.N. Ananth,V.J. Ravishankar, Utpal K. Mukhopadhyay.,
Vijay Pillai, Vijay Ranchan, Vinod Hari, Vinod Vyasuslu, Y.M. Shivamurthy, and Y.V. Reddy.
My special thanks to Anupam Rastogi for helping with the editing, and especially for his incisive and pragmatic
comments on my own contributions to this report. Mahesh Vyas provided the statistical appendix which was put together
by Lakshi Raghavan Murali of the CMIE and Bhavin Kothari of IIMA.
I thank Jahar Saha for the personal encouragement and concern he has shown in this endeavor, and the active support
that IIMA provided. I also thank J.S. Chokkar, and Bakul Dholakia for their continued support and encouragement. I
also thank N. Jhaveri for his valuable suggestions. The Computer Services Group ensured a well-functioning and very
reliable network for which I am grateful.
Urmil Anjaria my secretary was ever ready to make repeated corrections at all odd hours. N. Sridhar provided help
with collation of data. Gracinda Rodrigues helped with the coordinaton of the brainstorm session in Mumbai and the
Workshop at Lonavala. We cannot thank her adequately for her tireless efforts. To the editors of Oxford University Press
we are in debt, not only for the editorial work, but also for their persuasive ways that were crucial in many of us being
able to deliver the papers on time.
To M.H. Jowher I owe a debt I can never pay, for helping me recover from the shock of being witness to the dastardly
events that happened in Gujarat, and with time to be able to focus on this report and my work.
On behalf of all the contributors, I thank all those who have helped us put together this report.
Sebastian Morris
Ahmedabad
CONTENTS
1. OVERVIEW 1
Sebastian Morris
Expenditures and Process 4 • Public Procurement 7 • Capital Expendiures and Cost Overruns 8 • Erc
Reports 9 • Social Expenditures 9 • The Idea of Private Finance 10 • The Local Bodies 12 • BEST and
MMC 13 • Rural Infrastructure 14 • Other Sectors 15 • Conclusion 16
References 17
Shifts in Policies 158 • The Process 159 • Food Subsidy 160 • Expenditure Process 161 • Conclusion
163
6.4 Facts from Figures on Public Investment in Infrastructure 164
V.J. Ravishanker & Priya Mathur
Components and Measures of Public Investment 164 • Anomalies and Adjustments in State
Government Accounts 167 • Efficiency and Quality of Investment 169 • Conclusion 170
References 171
Taxation and Levy Powers 222 • Expenditures of Municipal Corporations 224 • Income of
Municipal Corporations 228 • Expenditure of Muncipal Councils 230
References 234
BOXES
2.1.1 Structural Reform, Government Expenditure, and Macroeconomic Policy 35
2.1.2 Efficient Expenditure and Growth 37
2.1.3 The Burden of Programmes 38
2.1.4 The Fiscal Deficit 41
2.1.5 Employment and Administrative Expenses 43
2.1.6 Financial Sector Reform and the Fiscal Deficit 44
2.1.7 Some Observations on the ‘Report of the Expert Committee to Review the System of
Administered Interest Rates and Other Related Issues’ 46
2.2.1 Is Consensus Possible on Policy? 61
3.1 New Road Contracts in Madhya Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh 70
3.2 India’s Transport Sector: The Challenges Ahead 74
3.3 Privatization of DISTCOMS of DVB 76
3.4 ABC of AT&C Loss 78
4.1.1 Colombia: Ley de Semáforos or The Traffic Light Law 88
4.1.2 Market-Based Regulation of Sub-National Debt in Mexico 89
4.1.3 Fiscal Transparency and India 90
4.2.1 Expenditure Review Commission on the Department of Supply and Affiliated Offices 103
5.1.1 The Model 124
6.4.1 Off-budget Borrowing as a Means to Finance Investment in Infrastructure 165
6.4.2 Pending Bills and Transfers to Public Account in Kerala 170
6.4.3 Zero-Based Investment Review in Orissa 170
7.1.1 Network Rail (United Kingdom) 174
7.1.2 Italy’s Creative Financing Deals 174
7.1.3 Accounting for PFIs 175
7.1.4 UK Experience on Private Sector Incentives in PFIs 177
7.1.5 Railtrack Shareholders force Government Climbdown 177
7.1.6 Risk Sharing in UK Roads PFI 178
7.1.7 Risk Sharing in UK Prisons PFI 179
7.1.8 Fazakerley Prisons Refinancing 180
7.2.1 PFI in India 184
7.3.1 Case Study: Restructuring the Dabhol Power Project 192
8.1.1 Installing Accountability, Transparency and Efficiency in Urban Local Bodies 208
8.2.1 Municipal Bonds—The Policy 215
8.2.2 The Municipal Bond Market in the US 216
8.2.3 What Can Be Done? 217
9.2.1 The 1987 National Water Policy 244
9.2.2 Structure of the ‘Pani Panchayat’ 246
10.2.1 Report of the Expenditure Reform Commission on the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways 283
10.4.1 Free-Pass Scheme and Privilege Ticket Orders (PTOs) 301
xvi List of Boxes and Figures
FIGURES
2.1.1 Index of Plan and Other Expenditure of the Central Government 31
2.1.2 Index of Economic Services and Other Expenditure of the Central Government 31
2.1.3 Index of Revenues and Other Central Government Expenditure 31
2.1.4 Ratio of Certain Items of Expenditure 31
2.1.5 Deficts of the Central Government and Interest Payments to GDP 32
2.1.6 Detrend of Log of GCF in Public and Private Sectors 32
2.1.7 Ratio of Real GCF to GDPFC 33
2.1.8 Share of Public Administration and Defence in GDP 33
2.1.9 Detrend of Log of Macro Aggregates 34
2.2.1 Revenue Deficit 55
3.1 National Highway Development Project of the NHAI 69
5.1.1 Effect on Growth Rates of Delays and Cost Overruns 124
5.1.2 Share of Public Sector in Gross Capital Formation 126
6.4.1 14 Major States: Fiscal Deficit & Adjusted Fiscal Deficit 168
10.2.1 Map Indicating the Location of the Coimbatore Bypass Project 280
10.4.1 Towards Improvement of Expenditure Accountability in the IR: A Scheme of Linked Actions 300
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS