Poly+Fract (I)
Poly+Fract (I)
3.1 Polynomials
3.1.1 De…nitions and notations
In this subsection, we shall give basic de…nitions, notations and vocabulary of poly-
nomials.
Let K be a …eld.
We denote by K(N) the set of sequences (an )n with elements in K such that
9p 2 N; 8n > p : an = 0:
The neutral element for the addition is the polynomial (0; 0; 0; : : : ) called the
zero polynomial:
76
The neutral element for the multiplication is the polynomial (1; 0; 0; : : : ):
(a; 0; 0; : : : )
X = (0; 1; 0; 0; : : : ):
X k = (0; : : : ; 0; 1 ; 0; 0; : : : ):
"
kth p o sitio n
P = (a0 ; a1 ; : : : ; am ; 0; 0; : : : ) with am 6= 0:
77
X X
Two polynomials P = ai X i and Q = bi X i are equal if and only if
i 0 i 0
an = bn for all n 2 N:
(N)
The ring (K
Pm; +; :) will be denoted K[X]. X is called the indeterminate and
when P = k=0 ak X k the ak ; 1 k m are called the coe¢ cients of P .
The elements of K[X] are denoted by capital letters
A; B; C; P; Q; R; : : :
Let P 2 K[X]:
Example 123
78
Pn
Let P = k=0 ak X k 2 K[X] (n 2 N): The map
Pe : KP! K
t 7 ! nk=0 ak tk ;
+ Q = Pe + Q:
1. P^ e
g
2. P Q = PeQ:
e
3. f
P = Pe:
I Let P; Q 2 K [X] such that for any t 2 K we have Pe(t) = Q(t): e This gives
(P^ Q)(t) = 0 8t 2 K. then, necessarily (P Q) = 0 (the only polynomial
possessing an in…nity roots is the zero polynomial) and so P = Q: This allows
us, when the …eld K is in…nite (this is particularly the case when K is a sub…eld
of C) to confound the polynomial P with the polynomial map Pe: In the next
example we will show that it is not the case when K is …nite.
Example 124
We give now some properties of the degree for that we agree to the convention:
1 + 1 = 1; a + 1 = 1; 1 < a for any a 2 Z.
3. deg( P ) = deg P:
79
Proof
It is then clear that deg(P + Q) = d = max(deg P; deg Q). The case when
d < e is similar. Finally, when d = e, we have:
P + Q = (a0 + b0 ) + + (ad + bd )X d :
Either all coe¢ cients are zero, and deg(P + Q) = 1 making the inequality
obvious, or at least one is nonzero and the nonzero coe¢ cient with the highest
index is the leading coe¢ cient of P + Q, and its index is well less or equal to d:
2. We have
X
n+m
PQ = ck X k
k=0
Pk
where for any 0 k n + m; ck = i=0 ai bk i : Then, cn+m = an am 6= 0; so
cn+m (since an and am are not zero)) so is the leading coe¢ cient of P Q. Thus,
3. val( P ) = valP:
80
Proof
Remark 127 Let P be a nonzero polynomial in K[X]: The following are obvious
1. valP deg P .
2. val0 deg 0:
Theorem 128 The ring K[X] is an integral domain and its only invertible elements
are nonzero constant polynomials.
Proof Let P 2 K[X] be an invertible polynomial, then there exists Q 2 K[X] such
that P Q = 1. Note that neither P nor Q can be zero. Taking the degree, we obtain
81
Since deg P and deg Q are non negative integers and their sum is zero, necessarily
deg P = deg Q = 0:
3. X P =P X = P:
4. (P Q) R = (P Q)(Q R):
5. (P + Q) R = (P R) + ( Q R):
82
3.1.3 Euclidean algorithm (Long division)
Theorem 131 For any A; B 2 K[X] with B =
6 0, there exists a unique pair (Q; R) 2
K[X]2 such that
A = BQ + R with deg R < deg B: (3.1)
The polynomials Q and R are called, respectively, the quotient and remainder of
the Euclidean division of A by B. The polynomial B is said to divide A or A is said
to be divisible by B if R = 0:
Proof
Existence: We prove the result by induction on the degree of A. When deg A <
deg B, we take (Q; R) = (0; A). Let us assume that deg A deg B and suppose that
the property is true for any polynomial P such that deg A n and show it for a
polynomial A with deg A = n + 1. Put
an+1 n+1 m
A1 = A X B;
bm
where an+1 and bm are the leading coe¢ cients of A and B, respectively, then
deg(A1 ) n. Applying the induction hypothesis to A1 implies that there exists
a pair (Q1 ; R1 ) of polynomials in K[X] such that
then
an+1 n+1 m
A= Q1 + X B + R1 :
bm
Uniqueness: Suppose (Q1 ; R1 ) and (Q2 ; R2 ) are two pairs of polynomials satisfying
(3.1), then
R2 R1 = B(Q1 Q2 ):
Then
deg(R2 R1 ) = deg(B(Q1 Q2 )) = deg B + deg(Q1 Q2 ):
As deg(R2 R1 ) < deg B necessarily Q1 Q2 = 0 and R2 R1 = 0; which gives
Q1 = Q2 and R2 = R1 :
Example 132
2. X 2 + X + 1 divides X 6 1:
83
3. For any n 2 N; X 1 divides X n 1.
Proposition 133
Proof
A = 4X 5 3X 4 + 5X 2 + 1
and
B = X 3 + 1:
We have
4X 5 3X 4 + 5X 2 + 1 X3 + 1
2
4X 5 + 4X 2 4X
| {z 3X}
Q
3X 4 + X 2 + 1
3X 4 3X
2
+X
| +{z3X + 1}
R
Then
5 4
4X 3X{z+ 5X 2 + 1} = (X 3 + 1) (4X 2 3X) + X 2
+ {z
3X + 1} :
| | {z } | {z } |
A B Q R
84
3.1.4 Division by increasing power order
Theorem 135 Let A; B 2 K[X] with nonzero constant term of B and let n be a
positive integer. Then there exists a unique pair (Q; R) in K[X]2 such that
The polynomials Q and R are called, respectively, the quotient and remainder of
the division according to increasing powers of A by B, and n is called the order of
the division.
Proof
Existence: By induction on n. For n = 0, let a0 and b0 be the constant terms
of A and B respectively. Then the constant term of the polynomial
a0
A B
b0
is zero, so
a0
A B = XR; with R 2 K[X]:
b0
a0
Putting Q = b0
we have
A = BQ + XR with deg Q n:
Assume that the property is satis…ed for n, then there exists a pair of polynomials
(Q; R) 2 K[X]2 such that
R = BQ1 + XR1 ;
then
Uniqueness: Suppose
and
A = BQ1 + X n+1 R1 (2) with deg Q1 n (3.3)
85
Calculating (3:2)-(3:3) we get
1+X 1 + X2
1 + X2 1| + X {zX 2 X}3
Q
X X2
X + X3
X2 X3
X2 X4
X3 + X4
X3 X5
X 4 + X 5 = X 4 (1 + X)
| {z }
R
Which gives (1 + X) = (1 + X ) (1 + X X 2
2
X 3 ) +X 4 (1 + X) :
| {z } | {z } | {z } | {z }
A B Q R
86