ACR - ITEM Analysis LAC

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION VIII-EASTERN VISAYAS
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF LEYTE
TABANGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
TABANGO, LEYTE
LEARNING ACTION CELL (LAC) SESSION NO.___

OCTOBER 18, 2021
I. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
Name of Activity Learning Action Cell No. ____

Activity Proponent School Head
Participants Math Teachers
No. of Participants 7
Venue Grade 10 – Rose classroom
Date Accomplished October 18, 2021
Total Expenditures N/A
Name of School Head Raul Aldo O. Pontoy
II. NARRATIVE REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The LAC Session dated October 18, 2021 at around 9 in the morning, started
with a prayer through an Audio-Video Presentation, singing of a Nationalistic Song
and an energizer participated by all the LAC Members. Then, LAC session proper
started with a powerpoint presentation of the topic and the objective of the session by
the third LAC Facilitator, Mrs. Leah S. Rubillos. She stated the topic to be discussed:
“Item Analysis” with session objectives: Define Item Analysis, Learn on how to
compute for the difficulty index and discrimination index.
After which, Mrs. Rubillos discussed the topic by giving the meaning of the
word Item Analysis and its purpose. She also discussed the preliminary steps in
doing Item Analysis which are: 1.) Rank the scores of the students from the highest
score to the lowest score. 2.) Select the top 27% performing group and bottom 27%
performing group from the total takers; 3.) Set aside the remaining 46% because they
will not be used for item analysis. 4) Tabulate the number of students in the upper
group and lower group based on their selected choice per item. She also discussed
the 3 Criteria in Determining the Desirability of an item which are: 1) The difficulty of
an item (Di) which pertains to the proportion of the number of the students in the
upper and lower groups who answered an item correctly. The lower the difficulty
index, the higher is its level of difficulty. She also emphasized that the desired index
of difficulty must not be lower than 0.80. She also discussed the process of solving
the difficulty index (Di); 2) Discriminating power of an item (Ds) is the difference of
the proportion on the “correct responses” between the students in the upper group
(UG) and the proportion of the students in the lower group (LG). She also discussed
the formula and the process of computing the discrimination index; 3) Effectives of
alternatives determines whether distracters (incorrect but plausible options) were
effective/ineffective in a particular item.
The School Learning Action Cell (SLAC) went well and everything was done
successfully which ended at around 12 PM.
Tabango, Leyte 6536

(053) 551 0014
https://tnhs_tabango.com.ph/
III. ACCOMPLISHMENT
OBJECTIVES STRATEGIES ACTIVITIES RESULTS

What are the What are the What are the Were the
objectives of the strategies that specific objectives
projects/activity? help in the activities in attained?
accomplishment each
of the objective?
objectives?
 Define item  LAC Session  Planning  Objectives
analysis were
 Learn on how  Cooperation  Open accomplished
to compute for of the Forum
the difficulty participants. during the
index and conduct of
discrimination. the LAC
Session
IV. MAJOR PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED
No major problem was encountered during the conduct of the session since
all participants were participative enough to share their ideas and thoughts regarding
the said topic.
V. OTHER INSIGHTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Constant/periodic conduct of LAC Sessions
Prepared by:
LEAH L. JORDA
Math Teacher/LAC Facilitator/LAC Documenter
Noted:
LEAH S. RUBILLOS
Master Teacher I/Department Head
Approved:
RAUL ALDO O.
PONTOY
School Head
Tabango, Leyte 6536

(053) 551 0014
TABANGO, LEYTE
MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT
MINUTES OF THE LEARNING ACTION CELL (LAC) SESSION, FACILITATED BY

MRS. LEAH S. RUBILLOS, LAC FACILITATOR ON “ITEM ANALYSIS” ON OCTOBER
18, 2021 AT GRADE 10 – ROSE CLASSROOM.
Attendance:
Present: 7 Absent: ____
Rhea Mae N. Arcabal

Feliciano C. Cuervo
Jenelyn R. Garcia
Leah L. Jorda
Leah S. Rubillos
Antonio D. Serelles III
Leonida O. Zafra
I. Preliminaries
After ascertaining a quorum, by the LAC Facilitators, Mrs. Leah S. Rubillos,
the session started at around 9 AM. Prayer was conducted through an audio-video
presentation followed by the singing of a Nationalistic song. An energizer also
follows.
II. Session Proper

The LAC Session dated October 18, 2021 at around 9 in the morning, started
with a prayer through an Audio-Video Presentation, singing of a Nationalistic
Song and an energizer participated by all the LAC Members. Then, LAC session
proper started with a powerpoint presentation of the topic and the objective of the
session by the LAC Facilitator, Mrs. Leah S. Rubillos. She stated the topic to be
discussed: “ITEM ANALYSIS” with session objectives: Define Item Analysis,
Learn on how to compute for the difficulty index and discrimination index
After which, Mrs. Rubillos discussed the topic by giving the meaning of the
word Item Analysis and its purpose. She also discussed the preliminary steps in
doing Item Analysis which are: 1.) Rank the scores of the students from the highest
score to the lowest score. 2.) Select the top 27% performing group and bottom 27%
performing group from the total takers; 3.) Set aside the remaining 46% because they
will not be used for item analysis. 4) Tabulate the number of students in the upper
group and lower group based on their selected choice per item. She also discussed
the 3 Criteria in Determining the Desirability of an item which are: 1) The difficulty of
an item (Di) which pertains to the proportion of the number of the students in the
upper and lower groups who answered an item correctly. The lower the difficulty
index, the higher is its level of difficulty. She also emphasized that the desired index
Tabango, Leyte 6536
(053) 551 0014
of difficulty must not be lower than 0.80. She also discussed the process of solving
the difficulty index (Di); 2) Discriminating power of an item (Ds) is the difference of
the proportion on the “correct responses” between the students in the upper group
(UG) and the proportion of the students in the lower group (LG). She also discussed
the formula and the process of computing the discrimination index; 3) Effectives of
alternatives determines whether distracters (incorrect but plausible options) were
effective/ineffective in a particular item.
The School Learning Action Cell (SLAC) went well and everything was done
successfully which ended at around 12 PM.
Prepared by:
LEAH L. JORDA
Math Teacher/LAC Facilitator/Documenter
Noted:
LEAH S. RUBILLOS
Master Teacher I/Department Head
Approved:
RAUL ALDO O.
PONTOY
School Head
Tabango, Leyte 6536

(053) 551 0014
TABANGO, LEYTE
PICTORIALS
LAC Facilitator, Mrs. Leah L. S. Rubillos discussed about her topic on “ITEM ANALYSIS”
Tabango, Leyte 6536

(053) 551 0014

ACR - ITEM Analysis LAC

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ACR - ITEM Analysis LAC

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ACR - ITEM Analysis LAC

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

LEARNING ACTION CELL (LAC) SESSION NO.___

Name of Activity Learning Action Cell No. ____

II. NARRATIVE REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Tabango, Leyte 6536

OBJECTIVES STRATEGIES ACTIVITIES RESULTS

IV. MAJOR PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED

Constant/periodic conduct of LAC Sessions

Tabango, Leyte 6536

MINUTES OF THE LEARNING ACTION CELL (LAC) SESSION, FACILITATED BY

Present: 7 Absent: ____

Rhea Mae N. Arcabal

II. Session Proper

Tabango, Leyte 6536

Tabango, Leyte 6536

You might also like