Ang M1 AR3
Ang M1 AR3
SCHOOL OF EECE
DIODE CHARACTERISTICS
EXPERIMENT 3
Submitted by: Ang, Alvin Kyle T.
Submitted to: Charmaine Paglinawan
Course and Section: ECE20L-2/B4
Group Number: 6
Charmaine Paglinawan
Instructor
1. I am the only person to use my Cardinal Edge
account using my username and password.
Interpretation of results
Objective A;
Anode-Cathode:
- Diode test function (DMM): 0.545V
- Ohmmeter: 2.015 Megaohms
Cathode-Anode:
- Diode test function (DMM): Overload
- Ohmmeter: Overload
Forward Bias:
The diode exhibits a forward voltage drop of 0.545V, which is within the expected
range for a silicon diode. This suggests that the diode is conducting when
forward-biased. The ohmmeter reading in the forward bias condition is 2.015
Megaohms, indicating a low forward resistance, which is typical for a working
diode.
Reverse Bias:
The diode shows an overload condition in both the diode test function and
ohmmeter when reverse-biased. This is expected behavior for a healthy diode.
In reverse bias, only a small leakage current should flow, and the diode should
exhibit a very high reverse resistance. The overload readings in this case suggest
that the diode is blocking reverse current effectively.
Objective B;
In Objective B, the results showed that in a forward bias, current is allowed
to pass through freely. Whereas in a reverse bias condition, the current is
restricted.
In the data we have gathered, we were able to come to a conclusion that
current flows freely in a forward condition. We computed a current of 1.1617mA in
the case where the connections are made correctly. However, when we turned
the diode around, the reverse current we got was 0.
Objective C;
In part C, we were tasked to determine the relationship of the voltage and
current of the diode when forward and reverse biased. Based on the results we
have gathered, we concluded that as we increased the voltage (forward bias), the
current exponentially increased, as shown in graph 2-2. Whereas in a negative
voltage, the current remained zero (reverse bias).
Conclusion
Based on the experimental results in objective A, the diode appears to be
in good condition. It demonstrates the expected behavior of a silicon diode,
conducting in the forward bias and blocking current effectively in the reverse bias.
The readings obtained are consistent with the specifications and characteristics of
a functioning diode.
Objective B was about the behavior of a diode under forward and reverse
bias conditions. Our experimental results demonstrated that in a forward bias, the
diode permits current to flow freely, yielding a calculated current of 1.1617mA
under optimal connections. Conversely, in a reverse bias, the diode effectively
restricts the current, resulting in a measured reverse current of 0. This result
showed the crucial role of biasing in controlling the flow of current through a diode
and contributes to a comprehensive understanding of its operational
characteristics.