Group 2 Report
Group 2 Report
[CMA 442]
ASSIGNMENT
MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION
ORGANIZATION
GROUP MEMBERS ID
MOHAMED FIRDAUS BIN HUSSEIN 2021271716
NURUL MAISARAH BT ROSLEE 2021223834
NOR SYAZLINA BT OTHMAN 2021647598
ROZIEZIANA BT HUD 2021654996
NOOR AZIRAH BINTI ISMAIL 2021439086
PREPARED FOR:
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
30 JUN 2024
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
1
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
ABSTRACT
This report explores the critical aspects of identifying and effectively managing defects in
construction projects, focusing on the roles and responsibilities of organizational personnel.
Defects in construction can lead to significant costs, delays, and safety hazards if not addressed
promptly and efficiently. Therefore, understanding how to identify, report, and rectify defects
is crucial for ensuring the quality and safety of completed structures Key topic covered in this
report including defect identification which is methods and techniqus for recognizing various
types of defects during different stages of construction, from initial groundwork to final
finishing. Emphasis is placed on proactive measures such as quality control checks, regular
inspections, and the use of advanced technology like drones and sensors. Besides, the
importance of establishing clear and efficient reporting channels within the organization is
important to ensure defects are documented accurately and communicated to relevant
stakeholders. This section also discusses the integration of digital platforms for real-time
reporting and tracking of defect resolution progress. .This report provides a comprehensive
framework for organizational personnel involved in construction projects to enhance their
ability to identify, report, and manage defects effectively. By adopting proactive measures and
leveraging modern technologies and best practices, organizations can mitigate risks associated
with defects, thereby improving overall project outcomes and stakeholder satisfaction.
2
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all those who contributed to the completion of
this report on defects identifying and handling in construction work. Special thanks to
interviewee from each profesional position for generously sharing their insights and expertise
during the interviews conducted for this research.
Their valuable inputs and perspectives provided a deep understanding of the challenges and
best practices in defect management within construction projects. The cross-summary of
interview results with other groups enriched the content of this report, ensuring its relevance
and comprehensiveness for organizational personnel involved in construction management.
Their willingness to participate and share their experiences has been instrumental in shaping
the recommendations and strategies outlined in this report. Their contributions are greatly
appreciated and have significantly enhanced the quality of this work.
3
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
1.1. INTRODUCTION
In the dynamic landscape of construction projects, the effective identification and management
of defects play a pivotal role in ensuring the successful delivery of high-quality, durable
structures. Defects in construction can manifest at various stages, from initial groundwork to
final finishing touches, and their impact can range from minor nuisances to significant risks
affecting project timelines, budgets, and overall safety.
This report addresses the critical importance of defect identification and handling within the
context of construction management. It aims to equip organizational personnel with
comprehensive knowledge and practical strategies to proactively identify, report, and resolve
defects throughout the project lifecycle.
Understanding what constitutes a defect and how to differentiate between types of defects is
foundational.
The roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders, including site managers, project
engineers, quality assurance teams, and subcontractors, are pivotal in ensuring defects are
promptly addressed. Clear communication channels and effective reporting mechanisms are
crucial for documenting defects accurately and facilitating timely resolution.
Moreover, this report emphasizes the importance of proactive defect management strategies,
including prioritization based on severity, collaborative problem-solving approaches, and
continuous improvement initiatives. By analyzing root causes, implementing corrective
actions, and learning from past experiences, organizations can enhance their defect prevention
and resolution capabilities.
Ultimately, the goal of this report is to empower organizational personnel with the knowledge,
tools, and best practices necessary to uphold quality standards, mitigate risks, and achieve
successful project outcomes. Through proactive defect management, construction
professionals can foster a culture of excellence and reliability, ensuring that every project meets
or exceeds expectations in terms of safety, quality, and client satisfaction.
4
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
The competitive and intricate supply networks in the construction sector are well-known for
encouraging unethical behaviour like bid-rigging, bribery, and labour abuse. According to
Bowen et al. (2019), the construction industry's competitive pressures frequently result in
ethical compromises, with unethical behaviour being reinforced by industry norms. Individual
characteristics also come into play, such as moral disengagement, cognitive biases, and
personal ideals. People may justify immoral behaviour to further their own or their
organization's objectives. Gino et al. (2020) highlights the importance of individual psychology
in moral decision-making as they address how cognitive biases might result in unintentionally
unethical behaviour.
5
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
The three components of the Fraud Triangle are opportunity, pressure, and reasoning. The term
"pressure" describes the drive or temptation to commit fraud, which might be brought on by
personal vices like gambling, unreasonably high-performance standards at work, or financial
hardships. Recent research, like that done by Murphy and Free (2022), shows how financial
strain and economic downturns can put a great deal of strain on people, which increases the
likelihood of fraudulent activity. Opportunities occur when people believe they have a chance
to conduct fraud without being discovered, frequently because of subpar organizational
structures, lax oversight, and insufficient internal controls.
According to a study by Dorminey et al. (2021), new potential for fraud have been brought
about by technology improvements and distant work situations, demanding revised control
mechanisms. People rationalize their dishonest behavior to defend their acts. They might
persuade themselves that their actions are appropriate because they feel they are being treated
unfairly, because they are merely "borrowing" the money, or because they have a sense of
entitlement. Jones and Kavanagh's research (2020) examines how organizational and cultural
norms impact the reasoning process and demonstrates how environments that overlook little
ethical transgressions can result in larger fraud.
6
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
Pressures from the competition and industry standards make ethical blindness even worse.
Tight deadlines and fierce competition in the construction sector might force businesses to
make compromises and ignore flaws to stay within budget and schedule. Bowen et al. (2019)
claim that industrial norms occasionally encourage unethical behavior, and that competitive
pressures frequently result in ethical concessions in defect management. Ethical blindness is
also influenced by individual characteristics such as moral disengagement, cognitive biases,
and personal ideals. People may justify immoral behavior to further their own or their
organization's objectives. Gino et al. (2020) highlights the importance of individual psychology
in ethical decision-making and address how cognitive biases might result in inadvertent ethical
failures in defect management.
7
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
8
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
A set of questionnaire interview was created to gather responses for the research. This project
measurements were adapted from Ts. Dr. Hafizah and the data collection followed a traditional
approach where respondents were individually interviewed, and their responses were recorded.
The interviews were conducted face-to-face and monitored during survey sessions with group
members from various companies. The chosen organizations were selected from a variety of
positions, ranging from contractors, to take part in the survey and provide answers. There are
5 professional resources from different projects and position in the interview selection. The
Project Manager, Engineer planner, Quantity Surveyor and Resident Architect has been
selected to offer valuable insights into the management of defects encountered in projects. They
are chosen to discuss practical challenges and defect rectification from the contractor’s
viewpoint. Each interview lasted between 30 to 60 minutes and was recorded and transcribed
for detailed analysis.
The queries in the interview session embody aspects characteristics of timeless, uncertainty,
personal development, accountability, opportunities, rationalizations, and contributions which
consists of 9 questions total. Here is an in-depth rationale on the importance of rectifying these
deficiencies: Rectifying deficiencies in construction is essential to guarantee the quality, safety,
and longevity of structures. It also carries significant consequences for financial control, project
schedules, and the standing of construction companies.
In this study, deficiencies in construction play a vital role for several reasons, as they have a
substantial influence on the quality, safety, expenses, and overall achievement of construction
endeavours. By giving priority to defect prevention and control, the construction sector can
provide safer, more dependable, and environmentally friendly buildings, serving the best
interests of all parties engaged.
The transformational leadership style is exemplified by five outcomes, while the transactional
leadership style is represented by three outcomes. These outcomes are categorized into several
dimensions: Educational, Indecision, Personal Growth, Liability, and Suggestions in managing
people in a construction organization.
9
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
4.0 FINDINGS
An interview has been conducted with professionals from various positions within the civil and
construction sectors to explore their experiences in identifying and managing defects during
and after construction projects. The objective was to gain insights into the challenges, practices,
and strategies employed in defect management across different roles.
We were able to create a single case summary that included the theme and sub-theme, as
indicated in the table below, because we had performed a few series of interviews for our case
study to gather data for theme and sub-theme:
Table 1.0: List of Theme and Sub-theme for Single-case Interview (Group 2).
THEME & SUB-THEME FINDING BY GROUP 2
THEME SUB-THEME
Educational Knowledgeable
Experience
Rationalisation
Indecision Ethical Blindless
Procedures
Work Ethics
Personal Growth Motivation
Opportunity
Liability Responsibility
Negligence
Suggestions Recommendation
Personal Opinion
10
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
Based on the findings from the interviews conducted on managing and identifying defects in
construction projects, several key insights and observations can be highlighted. Interviews
reveal a complex landscape where multiple factors intersect to influence how defects are
managed and identified in construction projects. From ethical dilemmas to procedural
challenges, the findings underscore the need for comprehensive strategies that prioritize quality
assurance while balancing project constraints and stakeholder expectations.
1. Accurancy
Decision Making
I would say the party that always overlooks the defect is the contractors. Because
normally the contractor's focus is to complete the construction on time. So, they
kind of try to hide it so that they can focus it on time within the budget and schedule
time. (CE).
There is a shared responsibility among various stakeholders, including workers,
supervisors, and inspectors, each playing a role in defect management (PL)
Roles and Responsibility: "Normally it will be the project manager who will overlook
or downplay defects in construction project" (S1-2)
“So, it’s advisable to just tell them it is impossible accept to overlook the defects.”(S4-
Q5-02)
2. Costing:
Time and Budget Constraints: These are major factors influencing the decision to
overlook defects. In many cases, defects in less visible areas or those deemed non-
critical might be ignored to avoid delays or additional costs (PL).
Cash flow contribute: "our company combination wise we will need to deliver the
product to the end user or we can call it a VP vacant position in order to get better cash
flow in in a very critical period so I think this is the things that contribute to the situation
where the defect management within our organization being destructed." (S5-12)
Budget: "Okay I agree with this statement whereby the deadlines and budget
constraints is often the main issue for projects that causing we that causes the
consequences where we cannot put too much on the defect management." (S5-13)
“The most project pressures because of the budget constraints. It is because cost for
repairing the defect need to include as a item in the project budget.” (S3-9)
11
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
External Factors: Issues such as weather conditions or supply chain disruptions are
sometimes used to rationalize the presence of defects (IOW).
3. Indecision
Ethical Dilemmas: “Pressure to meet deadlines and client expectations can lead to
compromises in defect management, highlighting an ethical dilemma between quality
assurance and project delivery “(PL, IOW)
Irresponsible: “Even though, the defect has been marked by site in charge or inspector,
they simply can minimize the mark or just remove that mark based on how bad the
defect is.”
Human Factors in Work Errors: "than that I think it was also because of human area
because you know some of them will tired, overlooking and also laziness at
least all will affect it's not causing it to purposely hide from the parties but it's because
of their laziness they are not being detailed enough to realize the defects." (S5-10)
Risk Management in Construction Projects: “We have done the rectification of the
defect but it usual can’t meet the satisfaction until we repeat several times” (S2-2)
Blind Spots: “There are instances where defects are concealed or downplayed due to
oversight or the desire to avoid conflict” (RA-14, CE 10).
Skill of practices: “There were occasions where the defects were minor; for example,
scratches on the walls or doors which the subcontractors request us to ignore as the
rectification involved repainting/restoration of a larger surfaces beyond the actual
scratches. As mentioned earlier, these minor defects were rectified, in line with our
policy in doing things right.” (S1-Q2)
12
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
“For example, of half slab precast product if that designed on drawing required said
that thickness need to half casting within 70mm thickness, but during the post
concreting checking got 60mm thickness and not follow required by from drawing. So,
in this case our supervisor concludes that this can be not have major issue, due of later
at site will have full casting overall with thickness slab 150mm overall, so at site later
client can cast top-up overall the thickness concrete.” (PMA-R)
Efficiency in decision making and action: “We can divide the defect by 2, which are
major defect and minor defect. When the deadline are just around the corner, we will
put a prioritised to a certain defect which is major and we will do the minor defect after
handover key to client. So that we
can keep up the dateline” (S2-3)
Prompt Action: “All contractors should put in place a proper mechanism addressing
defects rectifications from the start of the project.”(S1-Q21)
Quality Control Protocol: “Compromises with JKR and HPUPM were reached
whereby we were to attend to the major defects which affect the operation of the
Hospital for the purpose of issuance of the certificate of practical completion (CPC)
and completing the outstanding works. Whilst the remaining minor defects were
rectified within 3 months upon CPC.
13
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
14
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
Table 2.0: The Result of Cross Case analysis conducted by 5 group case study
THEME - SUB-THEME
15
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
EFFICIENCY SURVEILLANCE
- FUTURE CHALLENGE - PASS OVER
-MONITORING OBSERVATION
-ENFORCEMENT - MONITORING TASK
-IDENTIFYING AND - COMMUNICA-
ADRESSING ISSUES TION
BREAKDOWN -
PROBLEM SOLVING
COSTING RATIONALISM
- COST-DRIVEN - INSPACTION
COMPROMISES IN EVATION
QUALITY
CASH FLOW
CONTRIBUTE
-BUDGET
PRESSURE MOTIVATION
OPERATIONAL IN - ADVICES
EFFICIENCY
16
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
- KNOWLEDGEABLE
- EXPERIENCE
INSTRUCTIONAL
- RATIONALISATION
- RESPONSIBILITY
- ETHICAL DILEMA
- ETHICAL BLINDNESS
- PROCEDURES
HESITANCY
- WORK ETHICS
- URCENTAINTY
- TIME AND BUDGET CONSTRAIN
- MOTIVATION
PERSONAL EMPORWERMENT
- OPPORTUNITY
- RESPONSIBILITY
COMPLIANCE
- NEGLIGENCE
- RECOMMENDATION
ENDORSEMENT - PROPOSAL
- SUGGESTION
17
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
5.0 CONCLUSION
Based on the insights gathered from interviews regarding the handling and identification of
defects in the construction industry, several key conclusions can be drawn:
Procedural Compliance
Professionals often adhere strictly to approved method statements and Quality of Workmanship
(QLASIC) requirements. This adherence can sometimes lead to overlooking or rationalizing
defects that fall within acceptable standards. QLASSIC assesses the workmanship of
contractors and broader quality assurance for building construction, which has led to
improvements in the quality of both contractors 5 and overall construction work.
Communication Challenges
Defects may go unnoticed or unaddressed due to breakdowns in communication among various
stakeholders, including contractors, consultants, and clients as the findings from the case are
mostly lead to lack of communications
Resource Allocation: Allocate adequate time, manpower, and budget specifically for defect
management to prevent compromises in quality due to time or financial constraints.
Training and Education: Provide continuous training for all involved in defect identification
and management to enhance skills and awareness.
Ethical Considerations: Foster a culture of ethical responsibility where all defects, regardless
of size or visibility, are addressed transparently and professionally.
Managing defects in the construction industry requires a balanced approach involving stringent
procedural adherence, effective communication, adequate resource allocation, ongoing
education, and a commitment to ethical practices. By addressing these areas proactively,
construction professionals can mitigate the risks associated with defect oversight or
rationalization, ensuring higher quality standards and client satisfaction in project deliveries.
This approach not only enhances project outcomes but also establishes trust and reliability
among stakeholders, crucial for long-term success in the construction sector.
18
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
References
Bowen, P., Edwards, P., & Cattell, K. (2019). Corruption in the South African construction
industry: A thematic analysis of perceptions and experiences. Journal of Construction
Management and Economics.
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2019). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The
Leadership Quarterly..
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2019). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The
Leadership Quarterly.
Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M.-J., & Riley, R. A. (2021). The evolution of fraud
theory. Accounting Horizons.
Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2022). Ethical leadership and employee behavior: A
moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics.
Fang, D., Zhao, C., & Zhang, M. (2022). The impact of organizational culture on ethical
behavior in the construction industry. Journal of Business Ethics.
Gino, F., Moore, C., & Bazerman, M. H. (2020). See no evil: When we overlook unethical
behavior. Academy of Management Annals
Gino, F., Moore, C., & Bazerman, M. H. (2020). See no evil: When we overlook unethical
behavior. Academy of Management Annals.
Jones, G., & Kavanagh, M. (2020). Rationalization and the influence of corporate culture: What
every fraud examiner needs to know. Journal of Financial Crime.
Murphy, P. R., & Free, C. (2022). Broadening the Fraud Triangle: The four pathways of
opportunity. Accounting, Organizations and Society.
Martin, K. D., Johnson, J. L., & Cullen, J. B. (2021). Organizational culture and ethical
behaviour: A strategic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics.
Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2020). (Un)ethical behavior in
organizations. Annual Review of Psychology.
Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2021). Ethics training and businesspersons' perceptions of
organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics.
19
CMA442 MANAGING PEOPLE IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION
Zhang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2021). Ethical leadership and ethical climate: Implications for
organizational behavior. Journal of Business Research.
20