©2021 International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies

ISSN 2228-9860 eISSN 1906-9642 CODEN: ITJEA8

International Transaction Journal of Engineering,
Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies
http://TuEngr.com

Impacts of Operation Conditions on the

Performance of the Fired Heater
Roaa Rashid Ali1*, Amjed Ahmed Ali1, and Adnan Abdullah Ateeq1

1
Department of Fuel and Energy Engineering, Southern Technical University, IRAQ.
*Corresponding Author (Email: rr168610 @ gmail.com)
Paper ID: 12A2S Abstract
Volume 12 Issue 2 Simulation of the process of the fired heater located in the south of
Received 31 August 2020 Iraq is conducted utilizing Aspen HYSYS. The simulation shows a
Received in revised form 07 perfect agreement with the datasheet of the fired heater. Different
December 2020 parameters in the case study examine their effect on the performance of the
Accepted 15 December
fired heater and improve the performance. The results report decreasing the
2020
Available online 19
flow rate of inlet hot oil maintains almost as equal as the value of outlet
December 2020 temperature of hot oil in the practical results. Reduction of fuel flow rate is
Keywords: showed reducing the temperature of the fuel gas and emission of carbon
Furnace optimization; dioxide. Thus, reducing the flow rate could be worth doing to obtain a clean
HYSYS; Heat simulation; and safe environment. Also, such a reduced flow rate maintains the
Furnance operation; temperature of outlet hot oil close to the desired temperature.
Dynamic mode.
Disciplinary: Fuel and Energy Engineering, Furnace Engineering,
Sustainable Energy Engineering.
©2021 INT TRANS J ENG MANAG SCI TECH.

Cite This Article:

Ali, R. R., Ali, A. A., and Ateeq, A. A. (2021). Impacts of Operation Conditions on the Performance of the
Fired Heater. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences &
Technologies, 12(2), 12A2S, 1-9. http://TuEngr.com/V12/12A2S.pdf DOI:
10.14456/ITJEMAST.2021.40

1 Introduction
The most important instrument in the oil and gas industrials is process fired heaters, or
furnace, utilized to deliver the heat liberated by fuels’ combustion to transfer such heat to the
flowing process fluid via tubular coils which their configuration are placed along the roof and wall
of the firebox, or radiant, section (Sutton, 2017). Furnaces’ number relies on the plant size and
complexity that are the most important parameters. In the radiant section, heat is primarily
transferred by radiation. Helical, vertical, arbor, and horizontal are examples of configurations’ coil
of a tube in the radiant section. Heat convection mostly transfers heat to the section above the
radiation section known as the convection section primarily added to the furnace for recovery of

Page | 1
waste heat. Generally, heat transfers to the surface of the tubes’ wall by radiation or convection
based on the location of tubes through the wall by conduction, and then to the internal fluid by
convection, and eventually remaining heat to the stack. Cabin, multicell box, and cylindrical fired
heater are examples of shapes’ structure (Tiwari et al., 2018; Ibrahim and Mourhaf, 2010; Ibrahim
and Mourhaf, 2008; Ibrahim, 2010; and Garg, 2004). The furnace is considered the highest
consumer of energy in the industrials of oil and gas such as refinery and gas companies. A furnace
has generally a control system for the combustion to control the flow of the product and the rate of
heat for the duration of the operation. Thus, reducing the emission of fuel gas and the efficiency of
process fired heater will have extremely inflected on the environment and the economy (Sutton,
2017). The managing combustion has the highest willpower on both emission and efficiency
because they are one relied on others. Soot’s coating on tubes has less impact on the performance.
The fuel of natural gas or oil, source of heat, and air are the requirements of the combustion
process in the burner. (Tiwari et al, 2018; Garg, 2004; Sutton, 2017; Wildy, 2000; Platvoet and
Baukal, 2013; and Underwood, 2017).
The optimum combustion being extremely clean and efficient happens once the amount of
fuel and air are in perfect stoichiometric ratio. For unit used natural gas as fuel, two molecules of
oxygen and one molecule of methane react perfectly to produce two molecules of water and one
molecule of carbon dioxide. However, such a ratio is constantly not the situation without using
suitable control and the mixture could be too rich in fuel. Simply, moving unburned fuel out stack
can occur in extreme situations. Insufficient oxygen affects the complete combustion and makes it
incomplete combustion (Underwood, 2017; Salih et al., 2018). Hydrogen and carbon monoxide
produce and depart the stack to the atmosphere Thus, emission and wasted fuel increase
(Underwood, 2017; Khodabandeh et al., 2016). A mixture of fuel-lean is employed in some furnaces
permitting more excess air which guarantees usually extra complete combustion. However, using
such a mixture has also unwanted side-effects such as the reduction in efficiency due to excess air
and promotes forming compounds of nitrogen oxide (NOx). Burners of low NOx are applied to
control the combustion diffusing the air and fuel mixture that leads to a decrease in the
temperature of peak flame and as a result the furnace efficiency (Platvoet and Baukal, 2013;
Underwood, 2017; Salih et al., 2018; Garg, 1988; Ditaranto et al., 2013; Cala et al., 2015; and Al-
Lagtah et al., 2015).
This work intends to improve the efficiency of process fired heater by minimizing the
amount of consuming fuel essential to heat the process fluid; besides, the goal of reducing the
emission of fuel gas such as carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide by investigating how specific
parameters of operation conditions affect the fired heater.

2 Description of Fired Heater

A unit in consideration is a Unit 59 fired heater in the LPG plant of South Gas Company of
Basra, Iraq. The schema of the direct-fired heater, cabin type, is shown in Figure 1. A fired heater is

http://TuEngr.com Page | 2
used to heat a fluid that is a desulphurized light-gas oil, and this hot fluid supplied heat to
preheaters or boilers. The fired heater is separated into three sections which are the radiant
section, convective section, and economizer section. The characteristics of hot oil are listed in
Table 1.

Figure 1: Schema of direct fired heater (courtesy of HYSYS (2014)).

Table 1: Properties of hot oil.

Property Value
Specific gravity at 15.6°C 0.831
Flashpoint at 50°C 65.5 ℃
Viscosity 6.5 mm2/s
ASTM of out point 228 ℃/ 325 ℃
Sulphur 0.15% wt. basis
ASTM distill: I.B.P 228 ℃
5% 242 ℃
10% 250 ℃
50% 276 ℃
90% 310 ℃
F.B.P 325 ℃

The pump is utilized to circulate the hot oil (closed system) from surge vessel to the fired
heater and deliver to the different units such as preheater or reboiler. The main properties of the
hot oil stream that entered the fired heater at normal conditions are summarized in Table 2 while
the properties of the fuel gas also are listed in Table 3.

Table 2: Properties of input hot oil stream.

Property Value
3
Flow rate 2750 m /h (Design)
1650 m3/h (Minimum)
Inlet temperature 150 ℃
Outlet Temperature 220 ℃ (Normal)
250 ℃ (Design)
Inlet pressure 10.7 bar (Normal)
11.7 bar (Design)
Operation pressure 8.5 bar
Total duty heater absorber 70 × 106 kcal/h (Normal)
84 × 106 kcal/h (Design)
25 × 106 kcal/h (Minimum)

http://TuEngr.com Page | 3
 Table 3: Properties of fuel gas.
Property Value
Burnt 22239 kg/h
Blanketing No consumption (Normal)
5200 kg/h (Maximum)

Heat is provided to the heater by combustion of fuel gas in 36 burners gathered in six zones.
Also, the fired heater is supplied with one distinct burner with two guns which are one for sour gas
which is produced by spent caustic’s stripping drum, and the other for fuel gas. Stream of nitrogen
is provided with the heater in circumstance of fire the nitrogen is directed inside firebox and stack.
3 Simulation of Fired Heater
Four steps studies are conducted by software package (Aspen HYSYS V.11®) to simulate and
evaluate the performance (efficiency and emission of fuel gas) of process fired heater. These steps
are organized as follows:
1) Simulate the fired heater and validate the results with the practical results.
2) Investigate the effect of fuel pressure utilizing between 0.9 – 5 bar.
3) Investigate the influence of the flow rate of fuel with ranged from 7000 to 3500 kg/h.
4) Investigate the impact of the flow rate of hot oil employing from 1.720 × 106 to 1.540 × 106
kg/h.
4 Result and Discussion
The furnace of South Oil Company is simulated and analyzed as showed in Figure 2. The
temperature of outlet hot oil obtained from the simulation software is close to its value in the
practical results. This alteration in the value of temperature between obtained results from
simulation and practical results is due to several parameters such as loss of heat or dissociation of
the combustion products at high temperatures (Ibrahim and Mourhaf, 2013).

Figure 2: Simulation of the fired heater.

http://TuEngr.com Page | 4
4.1 Influence of Fuel Gas Pressure
Regarding the impact of fuel pressure on the performance of the fired heater is carried out.
The results show that altering such pressure does not affect increase the temperature of outlet hot
oil, CO2 composition in fuel gas, and temperature of fuel gas as well. This may attribute to the
direction of gas that is in the direction of volatility of gas in the normal way. Thus, fuel gas pressure
is indicated as an independent parameter and cannot generally affect the efficiency of the fired
heater. Figure 3, 4, and 5 represent the effect of fuel pressure on the temperature of hot oil, fuel
gas, and the emission of CO2 Ibrahim and Mourhaf, 2010, Ibrahim, 2010, Khodabandeh et al., 2016,
Garg,1988, Feldbauer,2009, Fialová and Jegla, 2019, and Arachchige, 2012). Garg (1997) reported
that one of the most parameters that need to be controlled with the excess of air and draft of
furnace is the pressure of fuel gas. However, the pressure of fuel gas is not a significant parameter
when the draft of the furnace is natural.

Figure 3: Influence of fuel gas pressure on outlet hot Figure 4: Influence of fuel gas pressure on fuel gas
oil temperature temperature.

Figure 5: Influence of fuel gas pressure on CO 2 Figure 6: Influence of fuel gas flow rate on outlet hot
composition. oil

http://TuEngr.com Page | 5
4.2 Influence of Fuel Flow Rate on Oil Temperature
Investigation of the flow rate of fuel on the performance of the fired heater is conducted in
this study. Results show that increasing the flow rate of fuel gas resulted in increases in the
temperature of outlet hot oil. The highest set value of flow rate according to this study is at 7000
kg/h. Reduction of flow rate means lower the consumption of fuel resulting in minimizing the cost
of the process fired heater. As a result, it could be suitable to minimize the flow rate by about 6500
kg/h to reduce the amount of consumption of fuel. The reason for decreasing the flow rate affects
the performance of the fired heater is related to a decrease in the amount of combustion fuel in an
applicable way. as exhibited in Figure 6 (Ibrahim and Mourhaf, 2010; Ibrahim, 2010; Garg,1988;
Cala et al., 2015’ Feldbauer, 2009; and Fialová and Jegla, 2019).

4.3 Influence of Fuel Flow Rate on Fuel Gas Temperature

The temperature of fuel gas is an important parameter being investigated in this study. The
case study of the mass flow rate of fuel ranged from 3500-7000 kg/h to show the impact of reducing
such flow rate on fuel gas temperature. The temperature is decreased by minimizing the fuel flow
rate and as a result, it is a benefit for the environment. The concentration of emissions from flow
gas is also decreased. Therefore, decreasing 500 kg/h in each step leads to a drop in the temperature
of flue gas about 20°C as presented in Figure 7 (Ibrahim, 2010; Cala et al., 2015; Feldbauer, 2009;
and Fialová and Jegla, 2019).

Figure 7: Influence of fuel gas flow rate on fuel gas Figure 8: Influence of fuel gas flow rate on CO2
temperature. emission.

4.4 CO 2 Emission in the Fuel Gas

The influence of the flow rate of fuel gas on the CO2 emission is also explored. It is well
known that increasing the composition of carbon dioxide in the environment has mainly impact on
human, weather, water, and plants. Therefore, decreasing the amount of it can save everything
around such as a fired heater. The results stats that decreasing the flow rate 500 kg/h in each step

http://TuEngr.com Page | 6
results in decreasing the composition of CO2 by 0.005 % which just decreases a little bet as
indicated in Figure 8 (Ibrahim, 2010; Cala et al., 2015; Feldbauer, 2009, and Fialová and Jegla,
2019). It is stated that the fuel flow is not the most important effecting parameter on the
performance of fired heaters (Gunasegran and Azarpour, 2016). However, it is an important
parameter that needs to be considered in this study.

4.5 Influence of Inlet Hot Oil Flow Rate

Altering the flow rate of inlet hot oil is a significant factor to research its influence on the
temperature of outlet hot oil. The purpose of the furnace in the South Oil Company is to heat the
hot oil to 220 ℃ and maintain or raise it a little bet is the goal of the researcher in such a field. The
outcomes demonstrate that decreasing the flow rate of inlet hot oil from 1.72 × 106 to 1.540 × 106
effects in obtaining almost close to 220 ℃ as displayed in Figure 9. Therefore, changing the flow
rate of inlet hot oil is an effective factor to be considered in improving the performance of the fired
heater. Effect of reduction inlet hot oil flow rate may attribute to increasing the time of staying the
hot oil inside the fired heater as a result, absorbing more heat (Ibrahim and Mourhaf, 2010; Ibrahim
and Mourhaf, 2008; Ibrahim, 2010; Cala et al., 2015).

Figure 9: Impact of inlet hot oil flow rate on outlet temperature of hot oil.

5 Conclusion
After analyzing and simulating the results of the Basra Oil Company furnace and comparing
results with the practical datasheet. In our study, the pressure of fuel does not affect the
performance of the fired heater. Altering the flow rate of fuel impacts the outlet temperature and it
is possible to reduce the flow rate to obtain almost close to the real outlet temperature of hot oil.
Altering the fuel flow rate also is influences the temperature of the fuel gas and emission of CO2
and they can reduce when decreasing the flow rate of fuel.
The reduction of the emission and temperature of fuel gas can be decreased by reducing the
flow rate of fuel. Lowering the flow rate of inlet hot oil results in an increase or maintain the
temperature of the outlet hot oil. Increasing the outlet of hot oil by lowering the flow rate of inlet

http://TuEngr.com Page | 7
hot oil is according to increasing the period of staying the hot oil inside the furnace and gain more
heat.
6 Availability of Data And Material
Data can be made available by contacting the corresponding author.

7 Acknowledgment
The authors would like to express their gratitude to Basra Gas Company for the support to
obtain the proper data for accomplished this work.
8 References
Al-Lagtah, N. M. A., S. Al-Habsi, and S. A. Onaizi. (2015). Optimization and performance improvement of
Lekhwair natural gas sweetening plant using Aspen HYSYS. Journal of Natural Gas Science and
Engineering, 26, 367-381.

Arachchige, P. R., U.S. and M.C. Melaaen. (2012). Aspen Plus Simulation of CO2 Removal from Coal and
Gas Fired Power Plants. Energy Procedia, 23, 391-399.

Cala, O. M., Merino, L., Kafarov, V., & Saavedra, J. (2015). Evaluation of combustion models for
determination of refinery furnaces efficiency. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, 23(3), 429-438.

Ditaranto, M., R. Anantharaman, and T. Weydahl. (2013). Performance and NOx Emissions of Refinery Fired
Heaters Retrofitted to Hydrogen Combustion. Energy Procedia, 37, 7214-7220.

Feldbauer, S. (2009). Furnace Optimization; Meeting the Need to Reduce Costs. Heat Treat. Prog, 25-28.

Fialová, D. and Z. Jegla, (2019). Analysis of Fired Equipment within the Framework of Low-Cost Modelling
Systems. Energies, 12(3), 520.

Garg, A. (1997). Optimize fired heater operations to save money. Hydrocarbon Processing, 76, 97-112.

Garg, A., & Ghosh, H. (1988). Good heater specifications pay off. Chem. Eng, 95(10), 77-80.

Garg, A. (2004). Get the Most From Your Fired Heater. Chemical Engineering, 111(3), 60-65.

Gunasegran, S., & Azarpour, A. (2016). Numerical Analysis of Influential Parameters on the Performance of
Vertical-Cylindrical Refinery Furnaces. Procedia Engineering, 148, 963-969.

HYSYS, A., (2014). Fired Heater (Furnace). Manual of Aspen HYSYS.

Ibrahim, H. A. H., & Al-Qassimi, M. (2008). Matlab program computes thermal efficiency of fired heater.
Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering, 52(2), 61-69.

Ibrahim, H. A. H. (2010). Fired process heaters. Matlab-Modeling, Programming, and Simulations, 327-364.

Ibrahim, H. A. H., & Al-Qassimi, M. (2010). Simulation of heat transfer in the convection section of fired
process heaters. Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering, 54(1), 33-40.

Ibrahim, H. A. H., & Al-Qassimi, M. M. (2013). Calculation of radiant section temperatures in fired process
heaters. Chemical Engineering & Science, 1(4), 55-61.

Khodabandeh, E., Pourramezan, M., & Pakravan, M. H. (2016). Effects of excess air and preheating on the
flow pattern and efficiency of the radiative section of a fired heater. Applied Thermal Engineering,
105, 537-548.

http://TuEngr.com Page | 8
Platvoet, E., & Baukal, C. (2013). Process burners 101. Chemical Engineering Progress, 109(8), 35-39.

Salih, M. A. H., Mohammed, A. A. A., Khalifa, B. Y., Elamin, F. O., & Hassan, N. O. (2018). Evaluation of
the Efficiency of the Combustion Furnace of the Delayed Coking Unit by Manipulating the Parameters
that Affect the Furnace Efficiency. American Journal of Quantum Chemistry & Molecular
Spectroscopy, 2(2), 18-30.

Sutton, I. (2017). Common Hazards. In Plant Design and Operations, 509-534.

Sutton, I. (2017). Equipment and Buildings, In Plant Design and Operations, 73-137.

Tiwari, L. M., Parikh, S. P., Gampawar, M., & Choudhary, P. (2018). Designing and mathematical simulation
of cylindrical and box type fired heater (used for heating of coke oven gas). International Journal of
Advance Research, Ideas & Innovations, 2037-2045.

Wildy, F. (2000). Fired heater optimization. AMETEK Process Instruments, 1-12.

Roaa Rashid Ali is a master's student in the Department of Thermal Mechanical Engineering, Southern Technical University,
Iraq. She received her bachelor’s degree of science in Fuel and Energy Engineering from the Southern Technical University.
Roaa is interested in the simulation and optimization of Heat transfer equipment.

Dr.Amjed A. Al-hassani is an Instructor of Fuel and Energy Department at Southern Technical University - Iraq. He got a
B.Sc. and a M.Sc. degree from the University of Basra. He continued his PhD study at the University of Malaya – Malaysia,
where he obtained his PhD in the reaction Kinetics field. Dr. Amjed's interests involve Gas Adsorption and Plants Simulation.

Dr.Adnan A. Ateeq is Professor and Dean of Basra Engineering Technical College, Southern Technical University, Iraq. His
field of interest is Design Of Chemical Reactors and Transport Phenomena.

http://TuEngr.com Page | 9