Mefa Unit-5
Mefa Unit-5
Mefa Unit-5
Working Capital
Finance is required for two purpose viz. for it establishment and to carry out the day-to-day operations
of a business. Funds are required to purchase the fixed assets such as plant, machinery, land, building,
furniture, etc, on long-term basis. Investments in these assets represent that part of firm’s capital,
which is blocked on a permanent of fixed basis and is called fixed capital. Funds are also needed for
short-term purposes such as the purchase of raw materials, payment of wages and other day-to-day
expenses, etc. and these funds are known as working capital. In simple words working capital refers
that part of the firm’s capital, which is required for financing short term or current assets such as cash,
marketable securities, debtors and inventories. The investment in these current assets keeps revolving
and being constantly converted into cash and which in turn financed to acquire current assets. Thus the
working capital is also known as revolving or circulating capital or short-term capital.
In the broader sense, the term working capital refers to the gross working capital. The notion of the
gross working capital refers to the capital invested in total current assets of the enterprise. Current
assets are those assets, which in the ordinary course of business, can be converted into cash within a
short period, normally one accounting year.
In a narrow sense, the term working capital refers to the net working capital. Networking capital
represents the excess of current assets over current liabilities.
Current liabilities are those liabilities, which are intend to be paid in the ordinary course of business
within a short period, normally one accounting year out of the current assets or the income of the
business. Net working capital may be positive or negative. When the current assets exceed the current
liabilities net working capital is positive and the negative net working capital results when the
liabilities are more then the current assets.
1. Bills payable
2. Sundry Creditors or Accounts Payable.
3. Accrued or Outstanding Expanses.
4. Short term loans, advances and deposits.
5. Dividends payable
6. Bank overdraft
7. Provision for taxation etc.
The capital budgeting appraisal methods are techniques of evaluation of investment proposal will help
the company to decide upon the desirability of an investment proposal depending upon their; relative
income generating capacity and rank them in order of their desirability. These methods provide the
company a set of norms on the basis of which either it has to accept or reject the investment proposal.
The most widely accepted techniques used in estimating the cost-returns of investment projects can be
grouped under two categories.
1. Traditional methods
2. Discounted Cash flow methods
1. Traditional methods
These methods are based on the principles to determine the desirability of an investment project on the
basis of its useful life and expected returns. These methods depend upon the accounting information
available from the books of accounts of the company. These will not take into account the concept of
‘time value of money’, which is a significant factor to determine the desirability of a project in terms
of present value.
A. Pay-back period method: It is the most popular and widely recognized traditional method of
evaluating the investment proposals. It can be defined, as ‘the number of years required to recover the
original cash out lay invested in a project’.
According to Weston & Brigham, “The pay back period is the number of years it takes the firm to
recover its original investment by net returns before depreciation, but after taxes”.
According to James. C. Vanhorne, “The payback period is the number of years required to recover
initial cash investment.
The pay back period is also called payout or payoff period. This period is calculated by dividing the
cost of the project by the annual earnings after tax but before depreciation under this method the
projects are ranked on the basis of the length of the payback period. A project with the shortest
payback period will be given the highest rank and taken as the best investment. The shorter the
payback period, the less risky the investment is the formula for payback period is
3. It dose not involve any cost for computation of the payback period
4. It is one of the widely used methods in small scale industry sector
5. It can be computed on the basis of accounting information available from the books.
Demerits:
1. This method fails to take into account the cash flows received by the
company after the pay back period.
2. It doesn’t take into account the interest factor involved in an investment outlay.
3. It doesn’t take into account the interest factor involved in an investment outlay.
4. It is not consistent with the objective of maximizing the market value of the company’s
share.
5. It fails to consider the pattern of cash inflows i. e., the magnitude and timing of cash in flows.
PAYBACK PERIOD:
1. A project requires an initial investment of Rs. 20,000/- with a useful life of 5 years. The
projected cash inflows for each year are as follows
Year: 1 2 3 4 5
CIF : 8,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 10,000
Calculate the Payback period of the project.
A. Pay Back Period:
Year Cash inflows Cumulative cash
inflows (CCIF)
1 8,000 8,000
2 8,000 16,000
3 10,000 26,000
4 12,000 38000
5 10,000 48,000
20,000 – 16,000
= 2 + ------------------------
26,000– 16,000
4,,000
= 2 + --------------
10,000
= 2.4 Years
2. A manufacturing company has two project proposals. Each project costs Rs. 2,00,000/- The
expected annual returns from the two projects are given below. Advise the company manager
which project is acceptable by using payback period method.
Project – A Project-B
Investment laid in between 3rd and 4rd years. Investment laid in between 2nd and 3rd years.
Therefore Pay Back Period = Therefore Pay Back Period =
Initial Investment - CCIF of L1 Initial Investment - CCIF ofL1
L1 + ------------------------------------- L1 + -------------------------------------
CCIF of L2 - CCIF of L1 CCIF of L2 - CCIF of L1
2,00,000 – 1,80,000
= 3+ --------------------------- 2,00,000 – 1,30,000
2,50,000– 1,80,000 = 2 + ------------------------
2,10,000– 1,30,000
20000
= 3+ ----------- 70,000
70,000 = 2 + ------------ = 2 +0.875
=3+0.285 80,000
=3.285 years =2.875 years
Note: Pay back period of Project A is 3.285 years and pay back period of Project B is 2.875.
Hence project B is acceptable.
It is an accounting method, which uses the accounting information repeated by the financial statements
to measure the probability of an investment proposal. It can be determine by dividing the average
income after taxes by the average investment i.e., the average book value after depreciation.
According to ‘Soloman’, accounting rate of return on an investment can be calculated as the ratio of
accounting net income to the initial investment, i.e.,
Merits:
1. Two project proposals require an initial investment of Rs.1,50,000/- each. The firm
estimates the returns as follows:
Year 1 2 3 4
Project-X 40,000 50,000 80,000 70,000
Project-Y 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000
Calculate the Average Rate of Return of each project and suggest the best project.
A. Project-X:
Average Returns = Total returns / No. Of years
Total Profits = 40,000 + 50,000 + 80,000 + 70,000 = 2,40,000
No. Of years = 4 Years
Average Returns = 2,40,000/4 = 60,000
Average investment = Investment / 2
= 1,50,000 / 2 = 75,000
Average Rate of Return = Average Returns / Average Investment X 100
= 60,000/ 75,000 X 100
= 80%
B. Project-Y:
Average Returs = Total returns / No. Of years
Total Profits = 50,000 + 60,000 + 70,000 + 80,000 = 2,60,000
No. Of years = 4 Years
Average Returns = 2,60,000/4 = 65,000
Average investment = Investment / 2
= 1,50,000 / 2 = 75,000
Average Rate of Return = Average Returns / Average Investment X 100
= 65,000/ 75,000 X 100
= 86.67%
Note: As project Y gets higher returns than Project X, Project Y is acceptable.
2. Arora enterprises has a project proposal with a cost of Rs.5,00,000/- which has an expected life
span of of 5 years. The cash inflows for next 5 years are 2,40,000/-, 2,60,000/- 2,00,000/-
1,70,000/- and 1,60,000/- respectively. The firm estimates the salvage of Rs.30,000/- at the
end of the 5th year. Calculate the Average Rate of Return of the project.
A. Average Returns = Total returns / No. Of years
Total Profits = 2,40,000 + 2,60,000 + 2,00,000 + 1,70,000 + 1,60,000 = 10,30,000
No. Of years = 5 Years
Average Returns = 10,30,000/5 = 2,06,000
Average investment =1/2( Investment – Salvage value) + Salvage value
= ½(5,00,000-30,000)+30,000 = 2,65,000
Average Rate of Return = Average Returns / Average Investment X 100
= 2,06,000/ 2,65,000 X 100
= 77.73%
The traditional method does not take into consideration the time value of money. They give equal
weight age to the present and future flow of incomes. The DCF methods are based on the concept that
a rupee earned today is more worth than a rupee earned tomorrow. These methods take into
consideration the profitability and also time value of money.
The NPV takes into consideration the time value of money. The cash flows of different years and
valued differently and made comparable in terms of present values for this the net cash inflows of
various period are discounted using required rate of return which is predetermined.
According to Ezra Solomon, “It is a present value of future returns, discounted at the required rate of
return minus the present value of the cost of the investment.”
NPV is the difference between the present value of cash inflows of a project and the initial cost of the
project.
According the NPV technique, only one project will be selected whose NPV is positive or above zero.
If a project(s) NPV is less than ‘Zero’. It gives negative NPV hence. It must be rejected. If there are
more than one project with positive NPV’s the project is selected whose NPV is the highest.
Merits:
1. Costal software Ltd. Is proposing to mechanise their operations. Two proposals M and N in
form of quotations have been received from two different vendors. The proposal in each case
costs Rs.5,00,000/-. A discount factor of 12% is used to compare the proposals. The estimated
cash outflows are likely to be as under:
1 1 X 100/112 0.893
A. NPV Determination
Year Proposal –M Proposal –N
Cash NPV@ Net present Cash NPV@ Net present
inflows value inflows value
12% 12%
------------- -----------
1,23,450 1,10,800
From the following information, calculate the net present value of the two projects and suggest which
of the two projects should be accepted assuming a discount rate of 10%
Year 1 2 3 4 5
1 1 X 100/110 0.909
NPV of total cash inflows 2,42,270 NPV of total cash inflows 3,47,280
42,270 47,280
Note: Both the projects are yielding positive returns. So both are acceptable. Based on outflow and
inflow rate Project X is desirable.
According to Weston and Brigham “The internal rate is the interest rate that equates the present value
of the expected future receipts to the cost of the investment outlay.
When compared the IRR with the required rate of return (RRR), if the IRR is more than RRR then the
project is accepted else rejected. In case of more than one project with IRR more than RRR, the one,
which gives the highest IRR, is selected.
The IRR is not a predetermine rate, rather it is to be trial and error method. It implies that one has to
start with a discounting rate to calculate the present value of cash inflows. If the obtained present value
is higher than the initial cost of the project one has to try with a higher rate. Like wise if the present
value of expected cash inflows obtained is lower than the present value of cash flow. Lower rate is to
be taken up. The process is continued till the net present value becomes Zero. As this discount rate is
determined internally, this method is called internal rate of return method.
P1 – Q
IRR = L+ --------- X D
P1 –P2
L- Lower discount rate
Q- Actual investment
Merits:
1. .Arunodaya Traders has a project proposal. The estimated project cost is Rs.50,000/-. Its cash
inflows for the six years are as follows:
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6
The assumed IRR lies between 18% and 20%. Calculate the Internal Rate of Return.
1 0 0.847 0 0 0.833 0
NPV of total cash inflows 53,418 NPV of total cash inflows 39,082
3,418 -10918
P1 – Q
IRR = L+ --------- X D
P1 –P2
53,418 – 50,000
IRR = 18+ ------------------------ X 2
53,418 - 39,082
3418
IRR = 18+ ---------- X 2
14,336
=18 + 0.477
= 18.477%
2. It is estimated that an investment in a new process will yield the following cash flows.
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The firm wishes to earn at least 12%on this project. Determine the IRR. The firm believes
that the discount rate lays between 8% and 12%.
NPV of total cash inflows 1,45,610 NPV of total cash inflows 1,20,790
7,090 -17,070
P1 – Q
IRR = L+ --------- X D
P1 –P2
1,45,610 – 1,38,520
IRR = 8+ --------------------------- X 4
1,45,610 – 1,20,790
7,090
IRR = 8+ ------------ X 4
24,820
= 8 + 1.14
= 9.14%
This method is also called benefit cost ration. This method is obtained cloth a slight modification of
the NPV method. In case of NPV the present value of cash out flows are profitability index (PI), the
present value of cash inflows are divide by the present value of cash out flows, while NPV is a
absolute measure, the PI is a relative measure.
If the PI is more than one (>1), the proposal is accepted else rejected. If there are more than one
investment proposal with the more than one PI the one with the highest PI will be selected. This
method is more useful in case of projects with different cash outlays cash outlays and hence is superior
to the NPV method.