Scribd
Upload
15 views8 pages

LC12

Uploaded by

chrisyymalate
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
15 views8 pages

LC12

Uploaded by

chrisyymalate
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

LC#12: Explicates the use of materials and the application of technique.

Garbage are scattered around our environment, especially by those


people living in the National Capital Region (NCR). This trash from our
surroundings or community can be recycled to produce something new and
transform it into a local product or a piece of art.
The Philippines has been blessed with a lot of local materials according
to previous discussions. Some of these are Abaca, Bakbak, Bamboo, Buntal,
Buri, and many others that are constantly being developed by talented
Filipinos.
But in the long run, our skilled Filipinos have gone through various
trials especially on the scarcity of the materials used and the growth of
technology that hinders the development of our existing methods in the
development of local materials so that new generations are gradually
forgetting the materials used and the application of techniques of our past.
Here is the application of techniques that should be revived and developed:

Hello reporters! Kindly include in your report the following:


1. A video example for each technique.
2. A 10 items quiz.
Oral Presentation: Scoring Guide

1. ) Organization
• 5 points – Clear organization, reinforced b y media. Stays focused
throughout. • 4 points – Mostly organized, but loses focus once or twice.
• 3 points – Somewhat organized, but loses focus 3 or more times
• 2 points – No clear organization to the presentation.

2. ) Content: currency & relevance


• 5 points – Incorporates relevant course concepts into presentation where
appropriate
• 4 points – Incorporates several course concepts into presentation, but does
not incorporate key concepts which are relevant to presentation.
• 3 points – Incorporates one or two course concepts into presentation. Some
course concepts discussed are not relevant to topic.
• 2 points – Course concepts are not integrated into presentation or are not
appropriately integrated

3. ) Quality of slides/media
• 5 points – Slides/media support the presentation, are easy to read and
understand. Slides contain no spelling or grammatical errors.
• 4 points – 80% of the slides/media are easy to read and understand. Others
contain too much information or have illegible font. One or two spelling
grammatical errors are present.
• 3 points – 50% of the slides/media are easy to read and understand. Others
contain too much information or have illegible font. Three to five spelling or
grammatical errors are present
• 2 points – 80% of the slides/media are difficult to read and understand. More
than five spelling and grammar errors exist.

4. ) Quality of conclusion
• 5 points - Clearly organized conclusion that wraps up the topic well, ties
speech together and has a note of finality. Smooth transitional flow from body
of presentation into summation.
• 4 points - Conclusion is not complete or organized. Transitional flow from
body of presentation to conclusion is not smooth.
• 3 points – Disconcerting flow from body of presentation into conclusion.
Speaker moves from body of presentation into conclusion without a smooth,
consistent flow.
• 2 points – Conclusion omitted. Speech just ends, it doesn’t feel complete.
Presentation does not end in a smooth manner.

5. ) Voice quality, pace


• 5 points – Voice is clear, easy to hear and understand. Speaker enunciates.
Pace is neither too fast nor too slow.
• 4 points – Problems exist with either enunciation or pace, but these
problems occur for less than 20% of the speech.
• 3 points - Problems exist with either enunciation or pace, but these problems
occur for more than 50% of the speech, but not more than 80% of the speech.
• 2 points – Voice is not clear, hard to hear and understand. Speaker
mumbles. Pace is either too fast or too slow.

6. ) Professionalism
• 5 points – Wearing the prescribed uniform, speaker is poised and well
prepared. Lack of distracting mannerisms by speaker during presentation.
Audience is able to focus entirely on information offered in presentation
without distraction by the speakers
• 4 points – Clothing is neat. Speaker lacks some confidence and/or relies on
note cards less than 20% of the time. A minimal number of distracting
mannerisms during presentation. Focus by audience is interrupted by
speaker’s mannerisms less than 20% of the time.
• 3 points – Clothing is neat in appearance. Speaker lacks confidence and/or
relies on note cards more than 50% of the time but not more than 80% of the
time. A moderate number of distracting mannerisms during presentation.
Focus by audience is interrupted by speaker’s mannerisms more than 50% of
the time but not more than 80% of the time.
• 2 point – Clothing is not appropriate and/or appearance is unkempt. Speaker
reads entire presentation. Mannerisms are extremely distracting to the
audience at least 80% of the time of the presentation. Mannerisms are so
distracting that the audience finds it difficult to concentrate on presentation.

TOTAL _______________________

Scoring
0-10 Does not meet expectations
11-20 Meets expectations
21–30 Exceeds expectations

You might also like