0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views

Database System Architecture

Uploaded by

2313721033030
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views

Database System Architecture

Uploaded by

2313721033030
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 45

Chapter 20: Database System Architectures

Database System Concepts, 7th Ed.


©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
See www.db-book.com for conditions on re-use
Outline

▪ Centralized Database Systems


▪ Server System Architectures
▪ Parallel Systems
▪ Distributed Systems
▪ Network Types

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.2 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Centralized Database Systems

▪ Run on a single computer system


▪ Single-user system
• Embedded databases
▪ Multi-user systems also known as server systems.
• Service requests received from client systems
• Multi-core systems with coarse-grained parallelism
▪ Typically a few to tens of processor cores
▪ In contrast, fine-grained parallelism uses very large number of
computers

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.3 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Server System Architecture

▪ Server systems can be broadly categorized into two kinds:


• transaction servers
▪ Widely used in relational database systems, and
• data servers
▪ Parallel data servers used to implement high-performance
transaction processing systems

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.4 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Transaction Servers

▪ Also called query server systems or SQL server systems


• Clients send requests to the server
• Transactions are executed at the server
• Results are shipped back to the client.
▪ Requests are specified in SQL, and communicated to the server through a
remote procedure call (RPC) mechanism.
▪ Transactional RPC allows many RPC calls to form a transaction.
▪ Applications typically use ODBC/JDBC APIs to communicate with
transaction servers

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.5 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Transaction System Processes (Cont.)

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.6 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Transaction Server Process Structure

▪ A typical transaction server consists of multiple processes accessing data


in shared memory
▪ Shared memory contains shared data
• Buffer pool
• Lock table
• Log buffer
• Cached query plans (reused if same query submitted again)
▪ All database processes can access shared memory
▪ Server processes
• These receive user queries (transactions), execute them and send
results back
• Processes may be multithreaded, allowing a single process to
execute several user queries concurrently
• Typically multiple multithreaded server processes

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.7 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Transaction Server Processes (Cont.)

▪ Database writer process


• Output modified buffer blocks to disks continually
▪ Log writer process
• Server processes simply add log records to log record buffer
• Log writer process outputs log records to stable storage.
▪ Checkpoint process
• Performs periodic checkpoints
▪ Process monitor process
• Monitors other processes, and takes recovery actions if any of the
other processes fail
▪ E.g. aborting any transactions being executed by a server process
and restarting it

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.8 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Transaction System Processes (Cont.)

▪ Lock manager process


• To avoid overhead of interprocess communication for lock
request/grant, each database process operates directly on the lock
table
▪ instead of sending requests to lock manager process
• Lock manager process still used for deadlock detection
▪ To ensure that no two processes are accessing the same data structure at
the same time, databases systems implement mutual exclusion using
either
• Atomic instructions
▪ Test-And-Set
▪ Compare-And-Swap (CAS)
• Operating system semaphores
▪ Higher overhead than atomic instructions

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.9 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Atomic Instructions

▪ Test-And-Set(M)
• Memory location M, initially 0
• Test-and-set(M) sets M to 1, and returns old value of M
▪ Return value 0 indicates process has acquired the mutex
▪ Return value 1 indicates someone is already holding the mutex
• Must try again later
▪ Release of mutex done by setting M = 0
▪ Compare-and-swap(M, V1, V2)
• Atomically do following
▪ If M = V1, set M = V2 and return success
▪ Else return failure
• With M = 0 initially, CAS(M, 0, 1) equivalent to test-and-set(M)
• Can use CAS(M, 0, id) where id = thread-id or process-id to record
who has the mutex

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.10 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Data Servers/Data Storage Systems

▪ Data items are shipped to clients where processing is performed


▪ Updated data items written back to server
▪ Earlier generation of data servers would operated in units of data items,
or pages containing multiple data items
▪ Current generation data servers (also called data storage systems) only
work in units of data items
• Commonly used data item formats include JSON, XML, or just
uninterpreted binary strings

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.11 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Data Servers/Storage Systems (Cont.)

▪ Prefetching
• Prefetch items that may be used soon
▪ Data caching
• Cache coherence
▪ Lock caching
• Locks can be cached by client across transactions
• Locks can be called back by the server
▪ Adaptive lock granularity
• Lock granularity escalation
▪ switch from finer granularity (e.g. tuple) lock to coarser
• Lock granularity de-escalation
▪ Start with coarse granularity to reduve overheads, switch to finer
granularity in case of more concurrency conflict at server
▪ Details in book

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.12 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Data Servers (Cont.)

▪ Data Caching
• Data can be cached at client even in between transactions
• But check that data is up-to-date before it is used (cache coherency)
• Check can be done when requesting lock on data item
▪ Lock Caching
• Locks can be retained by client system even in between transactions
• Transactions can acquire cached locks locally, without contacting
server
• Server calls back locks from clients when it receives conflicting lock
request. Client returns lock once no local transaction is using it.
▪ Similar to lock callback on prefetch, but across transactions.

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.13 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Parallel Systems

▪ Parallel database systems consist of multiple processors and multiple


disks connected by a fast interconnection network.
▪ Motivation: handle workloads beyond what a single computer system can
handle
▪ High performance transaction processing
• E.g. handling user requests at web-scale
▪ Decision support on very large amounts of data
• E.g. data gathered by large web sites/apps

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.14 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Parallel Systems (Cont.)

▪ A coarse-grain parallel machine consists of a small number of powerful


processors
▪ A massively parallel or fine grain parallel machine utilizes thousands of
smaller processors.
• Typically hosted in a data center
▪ Two main performance measures:
• throughput --- the number of tasks that can be completed in a given
time interval
• response time --- the amount of time it takes to complete a single
task from the time it is submitted

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.15 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Speed-Up and Scale-Up

▪ Speedup: a fixed-sized problem executing on a small system is given to a


system which is N-times larger.
• Measured by:
speedup = small system elapsed time
large system elapsed time
• Speedup is linear if equation equals N.
▪ Scaleup: increase the size of both the problem and the system
• N-times larger system used to perform N-times larger job
• Measured by:
scaleup = small system small problem elapsed time
big system big problem elapsed time
• Scale up is linear if equation equals 1.

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.16 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Speedup

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.17 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Scaleup

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.18 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Batch and Transaction Scaleup

▪ Batch scaleup:
• A single large job; typical of most decision support queries and
scientific simulation.
• Use an N-times larger computer on N-times larger problem.
▪ Transaction scaleup:
• Numerous small queries submitted by independent users to a shared
database; typical transaction processing and timesharing systems.
• N-times as many users submitting requests (hence, N-times as many
requests) to an N-times larger database, on an N-times larger
computer.
• Well-suited to parallel execution.

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.19 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Factors Limiting Speedup and Scaleup

Speedup and scaleup are often sublinear due to:


▪ Startup/sequential costs: Cost of starting up multiple processes, and
sequential computation before/after parallel computation
• May dominate computation time, if the degree of parallelism is high
• Suppose p fraction of computation is sequential
• Amdahl’s law: speedup limited to: 1 / [(1-p)+(p/n)]
• Gustafson’s law: scaleup limited to: 1 / [n(1-p)+p]
▪ Interference: Processes accessing shared resources (e.g.,system bus,
disks, or locks) compete with each other, thus spending time waiting on
other processes, rather than performing useful work.
▪ Skew: Increasing the degree of parallelism increases the variance in
service times of parallely executing tasks. Overall execution time
determined by slowest of parallely executing tasks.

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.20 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Interconnection Network Architectures

▪ Bus. System components send data on and receive data from a single
communication bus;
• Does not scale well with increasing parallelism.
▪ Mesh. Components are arranged as nodes in a grid, and each component
is connected to all adjacent components
• Communication links grow with growing number of components, and
so scales better.
• But may require 2√n hops to send message to a node (or √n with
wraparound connections at edge of grid).
▪ Hypercube. Components are numbered in binary; components are
connected to one another if their binary representations differ in exactly
one bit.
• n components are connected to log(n) other components and can
reach each other via at most log(n) links; reduces communication
delays.
▪ Tree-like Topology. Widely used in data centers today

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.21 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Interconnection Architectures

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.22 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Interconnection Network Architectures

▪ Tree-like or Fat-Tree Topology: widely used in data centers today


• Top of rack switch for approx 40 machines in rack
• Each top of rack switch connected to multiple aggregation switches.
• Aggregation switches connect to multiple core switches.
▪ Data center fabric

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.23 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Network Technologies

▪ Ethernet
• 1 Gbps and 10 Gbps common, 40 Gbps and 100 Gbps are
available at higher cost
▪ Fiber Channel
• 32-138 Gbps available
▪ Infiniband
• a very-low-latency networking technology
▪ 0.5 to 0.7 microseconds, compared to a few microseconds for
optimized ethernet

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.24 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Parallel Database Architectures

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.25 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Shared Memory

▪ Processors (or processor cores) and disks


have access to a common memory
• Via a bus in earlier days, through an
interconnection network today
▪ Extremely efficient communication between
processors
▪ Downside: shared-memory architecture is
not scalable beyond 64 to 128 processor
cores
• Memory interconnection network
becomes a bottleneck

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.26 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Modern Shared Memory Architecture

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.27 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Cache Levels

▪ Cache line: typically 64 bytes in today’s processors


▪ Cache levels within a single multi-core processor

▪ Shared memory system can have multiple processors, each with its own
cache levels

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.28 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Cache Coherency

▪ Cache coherency:
• Local cache may have out of date value
• Strong vs weak consistency models
• With weak consistency, need special instructions to ensure cache is
up to date
▪ Memory barrier instructions
• Store barrier (sfence)
▪ Instruction returns after forcing cached data to be written to
memory and invalidations sent to all caches
• Load barrier (lfence)
▪ Returns after ensuring all pending cache invalidations are
processed
• mfence instruction does both of above
▪ Locking code usually takes care of barrier instructions
• Lfence done after lock acquisition and sfence done before lock release

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.29 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Shared Disk

▪ All processors can directly access all


disks via an interconnection network,
but the processors have private
memories.
• Architecture provides a degree of
fault-tolerance — if a processor
fails, the other processors can
take over its tasks
▪ the data of the failed
processor is resident on disks
that are accessible from all
processors.
▪ Downside: bottleneck now occurs at
interconnection to the disk
subsystem.

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.30 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Modern Shared Disk Architectures:
via Storage Area Network (SAN)

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.31 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Shared Nothing

▪ Node consists of a processor,


memory, and one or more disks
▪ All communication via
interconnection network
▪ Can be scaled up to thousands of
processors without interference.
▪ Main drawback: cost of
communication and non-local disk
access; sending data involves
software interaction at both ends.

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.32 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Hierarchical

▪ Combines characteristics of shared-memory, shared-disk, and


shared-nothing architectures.
• Top level is a shared-nothing architecture
▪ With each node of the system being a shared-memory system
• Alternatively, top level could be a shared-disk system
▪ With each node of the system being a shared-memory system

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.33 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Shared-Memory Vs Shared-Nothing

▪ Shared-memory internally looks like shared-nothing!


• Each processor has direct access to its own memory, and indirect
(hardware level) access to rest of memory
• Also called non-uniform memory architecture (NUMA)
▪ Shared-nothing can be made to look like shared memory
• Reduce the complexity of programming such systems by distributed
virtual-memory abstraction
• Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) provides very low-latency
shared memory abstraction on shared-nothing systems
▪ Often implemented on top of infiniband due it its very-low-latency
• But careless programming can lead to performance issues

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.34 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Distributed Systems

▪ Data spread over multiple machines (also referred to as sites or nodes).


▪ Local-area networks (LANs)
▪ Wide-area networks (WANs)
• Higher latency

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.35 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Distributed Databases

▪ Homogeneous distributed databases


• Same software/schema on all sites, data may be partitioned among
sites
• Goal: provide a view of a single database, hiding details of distribution
▪ Heterogeneous distributed databases
• Different software/schema on different sites
• Goal: integrate existing databases to provide useful functionality
▪ Differentiate between local transactions and global transactions
• A local transaction accesses data in the single site at which the
transaction was initiated.
• A global transaction either accesses data in a site different from the
one at which the transaction was initiated or accesses data in several
different sites.

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.36 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Data Integration and Distributed Databases
▪ Data integration between multiple distributed databases
▪ Benefits:
• Sharing data – users at one site able to access the data residing at
some other sites.
• Autonomy – each site is able to retain a degree of control over data
stored locally.

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.37 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Availability

▪ Network partitioning
▪ Availability of system
• If all nodes are required for system to function, failure of even one
node stops system functioning.
• Higher system availability through redundancy
▪ data can be replicated at remote sites, and system can function
even if a site fails.

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.38 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Implementation Issues for Distributed
Databases
▪ Atomicity needed even for transactions that update data at multiple sites
▪ The two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is used to ensure atomicity
• Basic idea: each site executes transaction until just before commit,
and the leaves final decision to a coordinator
• Each site must follow decision of coordinator, even if there is a failure
while waiting for coordinators decision
▪ 2PC is not always appropriate: other transaction models based on
persistent messaging, and workflows, are also used
▪ Distributed concurrency control (and deadlock detection) required
▪ Data items may be replicated to improve data availability
▪ Details of all above in Chapter 24

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.39 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Cloud Based Services

▪ Cloud computing widely adopted today


• On-demand provisioning and elasticity
▪ ability to scale up at short notice and to release of unused
resources for use by others
▪ Infrastructure as a service
• Virtual machines/real machines
▪ Platform as a service
• Storage, databases, application server
▪ Software as a service
• Enterprise applications, emails, shared documents, etc,
▪ Potential drawbacks
• Security
• Network bandwidth

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.40 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Cloud Service Models

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.41 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Application Deployment Alternatives

Individual Machines Virtual Machines Containers


(e.g. VMWare, KVM, ..) (e.g. Docker)

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.42 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


Application Deployment Architectures

▪ Services
▪ Microservice Architecture
• Application uses a variety of services
• Service can add or remove instances as required
▪ Kubernetes supports containers, and microservices

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.43 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan


End of Chapter 20

Database System Concepts, 7th Ed.


©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
See www.db-book.com for conditions on re-use
Figure 17.11

Database System Concepts - 7th 20.45 ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan

You might also like