2.electrostatic Potential and Capacitance
2.electrostatic Potential and Capacitance
In the figure,
q is the point charge placed at O in free space,
x is the distance between q and 1C,
P is a point at a distance r from O,
E is the electric field due to the charge q,
+l C is the charge placed at a point A,
A and B are the two points separated by a small distance of dx.
From Coulomb's law,
1 q 1 1 q1q2
F= -------- (1) F = , where q = q and q = 1C
4 o x 2 4 o x 2
1 2
The work done in moving 1C of charge from A to B is
dW = -F dx [ Work done = Force displacement]
where negative sign indicates that the work is done opposite to the direction of electric field.
The total work done in moving 1C of charge from x = to x = r can be calculated by using integration.
r r r r r
1 q q 1 q 1 q 1 1
W = dW = − Fdx = − dx = − dx = − − x = 4 r −
4 o x 2
4 o x 2
4 o o
1 q
W =
4 o r
1 q
For a charge of 1C, V = W V =
4 o r
Note:
1. Although V is called the potential at a point, but actually V is equal to potential difference between the
points r and
1 q
2. Electric potential due to charge +q placed in air, V =
4 o r
1 (− q )
3. Electric potential due to charge -q placed in air, V =
4 o r
V V
4. Electric potential in dielectric medium other than free space, Vm = air = air
r K
NP.1(a) Calculate the potential at a point P due to a charge of 4×10–7C located 9 cm away.
(b) Hence obtain the work done in bringing a charge of 2×10–9 C from infinity to the point P. Does the answer
depend on the path along which the charge is brought?
1 𝑄
(a) 𝑉 = 4𝜋𝜖 𝑟 = 4× 104 V
𝑜
(b) W = qV = 2× 10–9C× 4×104V = 8× 10–5 J
No, work done will be path independent. Any arbitrary infinitesimal path can be resolved into two
perpendicular displacements: One along r and another perpendicular to r. The work done corresponding to
the later will be zero.
TP1:Two charges 5 × 10–8 C and –3 × 10–8 C are located 16 cm apart. At what point(s) on the line joining
the two charges is the electric potential zero? Take the potential at infinity to be zero.
Electric potential due to an electric dipole:
In the figure, -q and +q are the magnitudes of charges, 2a is the distance between the charges, O is the
midpoint of the dipole, P is the point at a distance r from O, is the angle between dipole axis and the line
joining O and P.
Case-1:
Electric potential due to a dipole at a point on the axial line
1 p
In this case, = 0 o and cos 0 o = 1 Vaxial =
4 o r 2 − a 2
At large distances, a r and a 2 can be neglected (for short dipole)
1 p
Vaxial =
4 o r 2
Case-2:
Electric potential due to a dipole at a point on the equatorial line
In this case, = 90 o and cos 90 o = 0 Vequatorial = 0
Comparison of variation of electric potential charge and an electric dipole:
In the above figure, AB is the V verses r curve with distance between a point
1
charge V
r
1
CD is the V verses r curve for a dipole V 2
r
Effect on the potential at a point if the medium around this point is changed:
If the dielectric constant of the medium is increased, the electric potential will decrease.
Note: The electric potential of a charge at a point at infinity is zero
Superposition principle of electric potentials:
Statement:
The resultant electric potential at a given point due to a number of charges is the algebraic sum of the
all the potentials due to number of charges.
Application of the principle:
Electric potential due to a group of 'n' point charges:
Let 𝑞1 , 𝑞2 , … … 𝑞𝑛 be the point charges placed at distances 𝑟1 , 𝑟2 , … … 𝑟𝑛 respectively from a point P.
1 q1
Potential at P due to the charge 𝑞1 , V1 =
4 o r1
1 q2
Potential at P due to the charge 𝑞2 , V2 =
4 o r2
1 qn
Similarly, Potential at P due to the charge 𝑞𝑛 , Vn =
4 o rn
From superposition principle, the total electric potential,
V = V1 + V2 + …….. + Vn
1 q1 1 q2 1 qn
V = + ........... +
4 o r1 4 o r2 4 o rn
1 q1 q 2 q
= + + ........... + n
4 o r1 r2 rn
n
1 qi
V =
4 o i =1 ri
Let P be the required point on the x-axis where the potential is zero. If x is the x-coordinate of P, obviously x
must be positive. (There is no possibility of potentials due to the two charges adding up to zero for x < 0.) If
x lies between O and A,
1 𝑄 𝑄2
we have 4𝜋𝜖 ( 𝑥1 − 𝑟−𝑥 )=0 where x is in cm.
𝑜
3 2
That is, 𝑥 − 15−𝑥 = 0
which gives x = 9 cm.
3 2
If x lies on the extended line OA, the required condition is 𝑥 − 15−𝑥 = 0
which gives x = 45 cm
Thus, electric potential is zero at 9 cm and 45 cm away from the positive charge on the side of the negative
charge. Note that the formula for potential used in the calculation required choosing potential to be zero at
infinity.
NP.4: Figures (a) and (b) show the field lines of a positive and
negative point charge respectively.
(a) Give the signs of the potential difference VP – VQ; VB – VA.
(b) Give the sign of the potential energy difference of a small
negative charge between the points Q and P; A and B.
(c) Give the sign of the work done by the field in moving a small
positive charge from Q to P.
(d) Give the sign of the work done by the external agency in
moving a small negative charge from B to A.
(e) Does the kinetic energy of a small negative charge increase
or decrease in going from B to A?
Solution:
1
(a) As V∝𝑟 , VP > VQ. Thus, (VP – VQ) is positive. Also VB is less negative than VA . Thus, VB > VA or (VB –
VA) is positive.
(b) A small negative charge will be attracted towards positive charge. The negative charge moves from higher
potential energy to lower potential energy. Therefore the sign of potential energy difference of a small negative
charge between Q and P is positive.
Similarly, (P.E.)A > (P.E.)B and hence sign of potential energy differences is positive.
(c) In moving a small positive charge from Q to P, work has to be done by an external agency against the
electric field. Therefore, work done by the field is negative.
(d) In moving a small negative charge from B to A work has to be done by the external agency. It is positive.
(e) Due to force of repulsion on the negative charge, velocity decreases and hence the kinetic energy decreases
in going from B to A.
TP2: A regular hexagon of side 10 cm has a charge 5 𝜇C at each of its vertices. Calculate the potential at the
centre of the hexagon.
An equipotential surface:
It is the surface having the same electric potential at every point.
Example: The surface of a charged body of any shape.
Equipotential surface for a point charge:
3. The direction of electric field is always normal to the equipotential surface at every point: If the
electric field is not normal to the equipotential surface, it would have non zero component along the
surface. So to move a test charge against to this component, a work would have to be done. But there
is no potential difference between any two points on an equipotential surface and consequently no
work is required to move a test charge on the surface. Hence, the electric field must be normal to the
equipotential surface at every point.
4. Equipotential surfaces are closer together in the form of strong electric field and equipotential
surfaces farther apart in the region of weak electric field:
dV dV
We have, E = dx =
dx E
1
When change in potential, dV = constant, dx . Thus, the spacing between the equipotential
E
surfaces will be smaller in the region of stronger field and vice versa.
Properties of equipotential surfaces:
1. No two equipotential surfaces intersect.
2. Work done is zero in moving a test charge over an equipotential surface
3. The direction of electric field is always normal to the equipotential surface.
4. Equipotential surfaces are closer in the region of strong electric field.
5. They are farther in the region of weak electric field.
dV
Relation between electric field and electric potential E = − :
dx
Let E is the electric field due to the charge q, A and B are the two
points in the electric field, dx is the small distance between the points A
and B and q. is the unit positive charge placed at A,
Let dV be the potential difference between A and B and dW be the work
done in bringing qo from A to B
W = pE cos 1 − cos 2
This work done is stored in the dipole as potential energy.
U = pE cos 1 − cos 2
( )
if initially the dipole is oriented perpendicular to the direction of E 1 = 90 o and then brought to an angle
( 2 = ) , the potential energy of the dipole will be
U = pE cos 90 o − cos U = − pE cos ------- (5)
Case-l: Position of stable equilibrium:
When the p is parallel to E ie = 0 o then cos 0 o = 1 (5) U= -pE
This is the minimum potential energy. In this position, the dipole will be in the stable equilibrium
Case-2: Position of unstable equilibrium:
When the p is anti-parallel to E ie = 180 o , then, cos 180 o = −1 (5) U = +pE
This is the maximum potential energy. In this position, the dipole will be in the unstable equilibrium.
Case-3: Position of zero potential energy:
When the p is perpendicular to E ie = 90 o , then cos = 0 o
(5) U = 0
In this position the potential energy of the dipole is zero.
NP.6: A molecule of a substance has a permanent electric dipole moment of magnitude 10–29 C m. A mole of
this substance is polarised (at low temperature)by applying a strong electrostatic field of magnitude 106Vm–
1
. The direction of the field is suddenly changed by an angle of 60º. Estimate the heat released by the substance
in aligning its dipoles along the new direction of the field. For simplicity, assume 100% polarisation of the
sample.
Dr. Sankara Rao Gattu, (9949435575) Page 8
Here, dipole moment of each molecules = 10–29 C m
As 1 mole of the substance contains 6×1023 molecules,
total dipole moment of all the molecules, p = 6×1023×10–29 C m = 6×10–6 C m
Initial potential energy, Ui = –pE cos𝜃 = –6×10–6×106 cos 0° = –6 J
Final potential energy (when 𝜃 = 60°), Uf = –6 ×10–6× 106 cos 60° = –3 J
Change in potential energy = –3 J – (–6J) = 3 J
So, there is loss in potential energy. This must be the energy released by the substance in the form of heat in
aligning its dipoles.
Various free and bound charges present in conductors and insulators:
Conductors are the substances which allow electric charges to pass through them easily.
Ex: Gold, silver, copper, aluminum, graphite, human body, acids, alkalis etc.
The electrons revolving in the outer most orbit of an atom are called valance electrons. The valence
electrons are loosely bounded to the nucleus in metallic conductors. The valence electrons detach from the
atom and they can jump from atom to atom inside the metal. These electrons are called as free electrons or
conduction electrons. In metals, there is very large number of free electrons. In an external field, these free
electrons drift in the opposite direction of electric field, which are responsible for current in the metal. The
positive ions which consists of nuclei and electrons of inner orbits remain held in their fixed positions. These
immobile ions are the bound charges
In electrolytic conductors, the charge carriers are both positive and negative ions. However, their
movements are restricted by the external electric field and electrostatic forces between them.
Insulators are the substances which do not allow electric charges to pass through them easily.
Ex: Diamond, glass, wood, mica, wax, distilled water ebonite, etc..
In insulators, the electrons are tightly bound to the nuclei and cannot be detached from the atoms. ie
charges in insulators are bound charges. Due to the absence of free charges, insulators do not conduct the
current.
Various electrostatic properties shown by the conductors when placed in the electrostatic field:
Net electric field is zero in the interior of a conductor when placed in the electrostatic field:
When a conductor is placed in the external electric field (E external ) , the
charges are induced on it as shown in the figure. Due to the induced charges
on the conductor, electric fie1d (E induced ) is induced inside the conductor.
Eexternal and E int ernal are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction.
Therefore, the net field (net electric field),
E = Eexternal - E induced = 0
At the surface of a charged conductor. electric intensity must be normal to the surface:
If the electric field is not normal to the surface, there will be a component of electric intensity along
the surface. Due to this, charges flows from one point to another point and produces surface currents. But no
such currents can exist under static conditions. Hence electric field is normal (perpendicular) to the surface of
the conductor at every point.
The net charge at any point inside the conductor is zero and any excess
charge resides at its surface:
A neutral conductor has equal amounts of positive and negative charges in
every surface element or volume element. When the conductor is charged, the
excess charge is always resides only on the surface. This is because of
property of charges. Hence the net charge and hence electric field inside the conductor is zero.
Electric potential is constant at any point inside and on the surface of a charged conductor:
The surface of a charged conductor is the equipotential surface. The
work done in moving a unit positive test charge from one point to another point
on the equipotential surface is zero. That is, there no potential difference
between any two points on the surface of the conductor.
Hence, electric potential is constant on the surface of a conductor. The
electric potential at any point inside the conductor is same as that on the surface. This is because; electric field
q q
Equation (4) in equation (1) C = = o ------- (5)
d d
o
q A o A
But = q = A (5) C = C= o
A d d
d
Note:
1. When a dielectric is inserted fully between the plates of the capacitor, the capacitance increases by r
times its capacitance in free space value.
2. When a dielectric slab is inserted between plates of the capacitor which is connected to a battery, the
charge on the capacitor is increases by a factor r
3. When a dielectric slab is inserted between the plates of the charged capacitor after removing the battery
the charge on the capacitor remain same but potential difference decreases by a factor r and the
capacitance increases by a factor r .
NP.8: A slab of material of dielectric constant K has the same area as the plates of a parallel-plate capacitor
but has a thickness (3/4)d, where d is the separation of the plates. How is the capacitance changed when the
slab is inserted between the plates?
Let Eo = Vo/d be the electric field between the plates when there is no dielectric and the potential difference is
Vo. If the dielectric is now inserted, the electric field in the dielectric will be E = Eo/K.
The potential difference will then be
1 𝐸 3 1 3 𝐾+3
𝑉 = 𝐸𝑜 (4 𝑑) + 𝐾𝑜 (4 𝑑) = 𝐸𝑜 𝑑 (4 + 4𝐾) = 𝑉𝑜 ( 4𝐾 )
The potential difference decreases by the factor (K + 3)/4K while the free charge Qo on the plates remains
unchanged. The capacitance thus increases
𝑄𝑜 4𝐾 𝑄𝑜 4𝐾
𝐶=( )=( )( ) = ( )𝐶
𝑉 𝐾 + 3 𝑉𝑜 𝐾+3 𝑜
Combinations of capacitors:
Capacitors can be combined in various ways to get desired value of capacitance. We can combine the
several capacitors to obtain some effective capacitance. The effective capacitance depends on the way the
individual capacitors are combined. Two simple combinations are series and parallel combinations.
Capacitors in series:
Capacitors are said to be connected in series when they are connected end to end such that
1) The potential difference across the combination is equal to the sum of the potential differences across
each capacitor.
2) The charge on each capacitor is same.
Consider A and B are the two capacitors connected in series, C1
and C2 are the capacitances of A and B respectively, V1 and V2 are
the potential differences across A and B respectively, V is the
potential difference applied across the combination,
Q be the charge on each of the capacitor
In series combination, V = V1 + V2 -------- (1)
We have, V1 =
Q
and V2 =
Q
( Q is same on A and B )
C1 C2
Q Q 1 1
(1) V = + V = Q + -------- (2)
C1 C 2 C1 C 2
If the combination is replaced by an equivalent capacitor of capacitance C s
Q
we get, V = -------- (3)
Cs
Q 1 1 1 1 1
on comparing (2) and (3), we get, = Q + = +
Cs C1 C 2 C s C1 C 2
W = dW -------- (4)
0