CMW Feedback On FAR

19 December 2023
Free Allocation Regulation (FAR) revision

Carbon Market Watch’s Feedback
The Free Allocation Regulation (FAR) revision is a necessary step to ensure the last years
of the free allocation system are coherent with the aim of a full phase-out by 2030 (or
2034 for CBAM sectors) and provide the investment signals necessary to funnel funding
into industrial decarbonisation.
For these reasons, Carbon Market Watch (CMW) does not endorse the Free Allocation
Regulation in its current version. After attentively following the process for its revision
within the Climate Change Policy Expert Group over the past months, we witnessed the
watering down of the text leading to an increase of free allowances to incumbent
industrial sectors. In its current shape, the FAR contradicts the political mandate given
to the European Commission during the last review of the EU ETS Directive. CMW
therefore calls for the rejection of the FAR proposal as currently drafted.
We recognise the European Commission proposed some improvements in ensuring
rules for free allocation of emission allowances are supportive of less carbon-intensive
production processes and ensure the “polluter pays” principle is gradually implemented
in full (results of this ambition can be seen in the rules for hydrogen benchmarking that
are now more favourable towards green H2, the now “aggregated” sintered ore
benchmark, and the inclusion of hydraulic binders in the clinker benchmarks). At the
same time, several key aspects of the draft regulation fall short of delivering the needed
push for more environmental efforts from sectors that bear the most responsibility for
GHG emissions.
Below is a summary of the key issues within the FAR that need to be urgently
addressed.
Steel benchmarks - Annex I

The sectoral benchmarks are not reflective of the “one product = one benchmark”
principle, but are instead linked to production processes.
- While the Commission decided to change the Sintered Ore benchmark
into an Agglomerated Iron Ore benchmark (arguably the most ambitious
change in the revisioned FAR), steel is still benchmarked in terms of hot
metal/DRI instead of flat steel output: a missed opportunity for reduction
of GHG emissions and for circular re-use of scrap.
Cement benchmarks - Annex I

The European Commission is well aware that reducing the clinker content is the best
way to reduce cement emissions, however they did not want to create an
all-encompassing cement benchmark.
- In the current proposal, benchmarks are still expressed in tons of (white
or gray) clinker; with alternative hydraulic binders added. This is a very
small improvement, because most supplementary cementitious materials
(SCMs) will not fall within the scope of the revision and will be penalised.
Technological innovations that effectively lower the most polluting
component of cement manufacturing will not be supported by this
regulation.
Historical Activity Level (HAL) - Art. 15 para. 3

The current ETS Free Allocation Regulation ((EU) 2019/331), the Regulation on
adjustments to free allocation due to activity level changes ((EU) 2019/1842) and the
Benchmarking Regulation ((EU) 2021/447)) all rely on the calculation of historic activity
levels by calculating the arithmetic average of annual production. The Commission
creates regulatory inconsistency by proposing to calculate it using a median level of
annual production instead of the average. More importantly, this change would exclude
the impact of years of lower production linked to the pandemic and the energy price
crunch leading to unnecessary overallocation of free allowances beyond what’s needed
to cover current production levels.
Heavy industries already benefited from over-allocation of allowances in 2020. Sectors
deemed at risk of carbon leakage received free allowances covering 104,5% of their
emissions, leading to windfall profits. Those profits from excess FAs show there is no
justification to allow the pandemic period to be less relevant in the calculation, let
alone to rule them out altogether. Apart from creating windfall profits, maintaining an
artificially high level of FAs allocation will trigger a higher application of the
cross-sectoral correction factor (as per Article 10a(5) of the ETS Directive).
Process emission value - Art. 16, para 2 point (e)

Free allocation for process emissions not covered by product benchmarks is based on
the grandfathering of historical emissions. The reduction level of free allowances for the
sectors concerned -at 97% of historical emissions- has been unchanged since 2013. The
current draft proposes a very lenient reduction value of 91% with enforcement only
starting in 2028. This renders the revision of the process emission factor largely
inconsequential and ineffective - especially considering earlier proposals by the
Commission to lower it to 79%. Failure to update this value significantly will undermine
decarbonisation of heavily polluting production processes, and create an uneven
playing field by artificially maintaining the amount of free allowances to those
non-benchmarked products.
In summary, we believe the European Commission falls significantly short on its mission
as ‘guardian of the treaties' to uphold the principle that the polluter should pay (Article
191(2) of TFEU)). Without changes to the current draft, Carbon Market Watch calls on
the other EU institutions to act responsibly and reject the delegated regulation.
Contact
Lidia Tamellini
Expert on EU carbon market and industrial decarbonisation
[email protected]

CMW Feedback On FAR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CMW Feedback On FAR

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CMW Feedback On FAR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

19 December 2023

Free Allocation Regulation (FAR) revision

Steel benchmarks - Annex I

Cement benchmarks - Annex I

Historical Activity Level (HAL) - Art. 15 para. 3

Process emission value - Art. 16, para 2 point (e)

You might also like