Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions
Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions
Edited by
Claudio Modena
University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Paulo B. Lourenço
University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal
Pere Roca
Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
VOLUME 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication or the information contained herein may be reproduced, stored
in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by photocopying,
recording or otherwise, without written prior permission from the publisher.
Although all care is taken to ensure the integrity and quality of this publication and the information herein,
no responsibility is assumed by the publishers nor the author for any damage to property or persons as a result
of operation or use of this publication and/or the information contained herein.
Published by: A.A. Balkema Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, a member of Taylor & Francis Group plc
www.balkema.nl and www.tandf.co.uk
Table of Contents
Preface XV
Organizing committee XVII
Volume I
Invited lectures
Seismic rehabilitation of heritage buildings in India – problems and prospects 3
S.K. Agrawal
Research for seismic redesign of historic masonry buildings 15
M. Tomaževič
The importance of investigation for the diagnosis of historic buildings: application at different
scales (centres and single buildings) 29
L. Binda
Evaluation and analysis of the old timber structures 43
A. Ceccotti
Remedial measures for the Cathedral of Porto: a post-modern conservation approach 51
P.B. Lourenço, Â. Melo & M. Carneiro
Considerations on the significance of history for the structural analysis of ancient constructions 63
P. Roca
Design approaches of interventions for the safety and conservation of historic buildings 75
C. Modena
V
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page VI
Technical state and renovation of buildings of Wrocław’s 19th century city centre development 137
P. Berkowski, G. Dmochowski, M.Y. Minch & J. Szołomicki
Constructive typologies investigation and approach proposals for the valuation of masonry arch state 145
C. Cennamo, S. D’Angelo & G. Voiello
Structural damage prevention in the historical building site. Theory and praxis in the eighteenth
century in Campania 153
G. de Martino & V. Russo
Restoration of the bell tower on the Church of Vistabella del Maestrazgo, Castellón (Spain) 159
F. Vegas López-Manzanares & C. Mileto
Palazzo Cittadini-Stampa: role of stratigraphy and cinematic analysis in the knowledge
of a masonry building 167
S. Bortolotto, C. Colla, D. Mirandola & A. Sponchioni
An architecture teaching program to rescue the historical town of Ouro Preto, Brazil 177
B.T. de Oliveira, E.C. de Araújo, J.N.S. Villaschi & L.C. Mancini
Analysis of a Roman masonry flat-slab in Hadrian’s Villa, Tivoli 183
D. Abruzzese, G.E. Cinque & G. Lo Gatto
Emergence, development, and prevalence of brick nogging in American vernacular structures 191
D.F. Laefer
Vernacular architecture and “historical seismography”: an experience research 203
O. Niglio & D. Ulivieri
The traditional twig-knitted wooden construction techniques: a vernacular architecture, “the Huğ house” 213
Z.H. Tokay
VI
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page VII
VII
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page VIII
The dynamic behaviour of the façade of the Basilica S.Maria di Collemaggio 469
E. Antonacci & G.C. Beolchini
Earthquake performance of Suleymaniye Mosque 477
S.M. Kaya, O. Yuzugullu, M. Erdik & N. Aydinoglu
Ambient vibration testing at N. Sra. do Carmo Church, preliminary results 483
M.A. Baptista, P. Mendes, A. Afilhado, L. Agostinho, S. Lagomarsino & L.M. Victor
Experimental stress analysis of historical forged tie beams of archaeological museum of
Spina in Ferrara, Italy 489
G. Bruschi, G. Nardoni, L. Lanza, F. Laudiero, N. Tullini, G. Mezzadri & S. Tralli
Dynamic identification and model updating of historical buildings. State-of-the-art review 499
J.C. Araiza Garaygordóbil
Structural monitoring in the Villa Reale of Monza (MI), Italy 505
A. Del Grosso, A. Torre, G. Corte, G. Brunetti & D. Inaudi
Dynamic monitoring of an ancient masonry bridge on Carrara marble way 513
G. Chellini, P. Orsini & W. Salvatore
Structural integrity assessment of medieval towers 523
A. Carpinteri & G. Lacidogna
Experimental and numerical analysis of the structural behaviour of St Stefano’s bell-tower in Venice 533
A. Lionello, I. Cavaggioni, C. Modena, F. Casarin, P.P. Rossi & C. Rossi
VIII
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page IX
Non linear step by step analysis for masonry structures using changing shape finite elements – new
developments and implementations 629
P. D’Asdia, A. Viskovic & C. Brusaporci
Construction sequence in the finite element analysis of Romanesque churches 635
L.A. Van Gulick
Structural scheme of the Cathedral of Burgos 643
D. Theodossopoulos
Comparison of the masonry structures analysis using the co-rotational formulation and a
simplified proposal 653
A. Agüero & F.J. Pallarés
Analysis of masonry structures by discrete finite element method 659
I.H.P. Mamaghani
Why does the Endless Column seem everlasting? 667
C.A. Safta
Structural analysis of Küçük Ayasofya Mosque in İstanbul 679
M. Massanas, P. Roca, M. Cervera & G. Arun
Prevision of settlement-induced cracking in historical building masonry façades 687
J.G. Rots & S. Invernizzi
Cracking simulation in a plain structure using the finite element method 695
L. Pani, B. De Nicolo & Z. Odoni
Volume II
Consolidation and strengthening techniques
Experimental investigation and analytical modeling of the effect of injection grouts on the structural
behaviour of three-leaf masonry walls 707
E.E. Toumbakari, D. Van Gemert, T.P. Tassios & E. Vintzileou
Application of mineral grouts. Case study and impact on structural behaviour: Church of St. Catharina
at Duisburg (B) 719
S. Ignoul, F. Van Rickstal & D. Van Gemert
Analysis of historic masonry shear walls strengthened by composite material 727
R. Capozucca
Two techniques for repair and strengthening masonry constructions 735
R.A. Sofronie
Structural restoration of vaults with extrados ties 745
A. Gubana & E. Giuriani
The main cupola of the Dresden Frauenkirche 753
V. Stoll & W. Jaeger
The medieval castle Spøttrup. Stabilization of the south wing 763
T. Jespersen
Technologies for the prestressing rings of the Leaning Tower of Pisa 771
A. Lodigiani & G. Macchi
A quick and low-cost method for strengthening high buildings: the case of St. Stefano’s
bell-tower in Venice 781
A. Lionello, I. Cavaggioni, P.P. Rossi & C. Rossi
IX
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page X
X
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XI
XI
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XII
Case studies
Masonry structure in the Crusader’s Castles – Syria 1267
W. Jaeger & E. Al-Khateeb
Library of Parliament of Canada – conservation, rehabilitation, upgrade case study presentation 1273
M. Petrescu-Comnene & S.R. Higgins
Pathology of the Dafni Monastery: survey, monitoring of cracks, interpretation and
numerical verification 1285
A. Miltiadou-Fézans, E. Vintzileou, N. Delinikolas, E. Zaroyianni & E. Chorafa
The role of survey for a correct FE analysis: the case of the Monte Oliveto Maggiore church 1295
B. Belletti, E. Coïsson, C. Ferrari & S. Pedroni
Researching the bearing system’s capacity as an argument in solving a dilemma in the interpretation
of the origin and development of architectural complex of the St. Donatus’ church in Zadar 1305
E. Lokos̆ek & H. Podnar
Analysis of Tapial structures for modern use and conservation 1315
P.A. Jaquin, C.E. Augarde & C.M. Gerrard
Preliminary investigation and monitoring for the design of a strengthening intervention on the
Frari basilica, Venice 1323
A. Lionello, I. Cavaggioni, P.P. Rossi, C. Rossi, C. Modena, F. Casarin, G. Marchi,
G. Gottardi & A. Ragazzini
XII
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XIII
XIII
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XIV
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XV
Preface
Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions IV continues the series of triennial international seminars started
in Barcelona in 1995 and continued with increasing success in Barcelona 1998 and Guimaraes in 2001. This
edition is organized at the University of Padova, at the beginning of its 783rd Academic Year, with a strong
involvement of the country, Italy, where an exceptional concentration of historic construction and a long tradition
of conservation actions exist: almost half of the about 160 accepted papers are in fact from Italy. Located near
Venice, Padova is also a good lookout of what is happening for the conservation of one of the world’s most
famous historic centres. The occasion is in fact taken to have a close view of significant works being done in
Venice, in the ambit of a special session organized inside its historic Arsenale. Venice is also the site of the
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science in Europe (ROSTE), so that the seminar is intended to offer a special
chance for debating the very specific problems that have to be faced in countries of east Europe and middle and
far east for the preservation of historic architectural heritage.
The number and quality of contributions, the number of countries, 27, from which the contributors came, is a
clear indication of the importance have structural safety aspects for ensuring physical survival of the architectural
heritage in all the world, and then the possibility to preserve its historic-artistic value with all the implied
cultural-social and economical consequences.
The major challenges to specialized people – technicians, art historians, conservators – involved in the multi-
disciplinary processes that are required to ensure the conservation of architectural heritage are all reflected in
the written free and invited contributions, organized in ten topics: “Historical Aspects and General Method-
ology”, “Materials and Laboratory Testing”, “Non-Destructive Testing and Inspection Techniques”, “Dynamic
Behaviour and Structural Monitoring”, “Analytical and Numerical Approaches”, “Consolidation and Strength-
ening Techniques”, “Historical Timber and Metal Structures”, “Seismic Analysis and Vulnerability Assessment”,
“Seismic Strengthening and Innovative Systems”, “Case Studies”. In addition to the free presentations, height
comprehensive plenary lectures have been provided by invited speakers.
As it is well known, it is not only a matter of dealing with a very difficult engineering problem, as it actually
is. The very basic safety concepts are quite different, and much less established, in the case of existing structures
with respect to the newly constructed ones. This is of course particularly true when the artistic/historic importance
of existing structures is such to accept higher probabilities of “structural failures” then in the case of the new
ones. Theoretical and experimental tools for analyzing the material and structural properties and performances
are continuously evolving, in a very distinguishing way they are in the field of moderns constructions. Learning
from practice is essential, even if the application are made always on “unique”, and for this only reason always
important, objects.
But even more crucial is the fact that both in the phase of the evaluation of the exiting safety conditions and in
the choice of the interventions an “appropriate balance” must by case by case found between “pure engineering”
and “conservation” aspects.
It is of course the hope of the organizers that the seminar and the book will fruitfully help practitioner
technicians and final users of their activity, and will stimulate scientists and researcher in further developing,
stimulated by the presentations and discussions, new and more and more reliable tools and methodologies for
ensuring “structural safety” while preserving historic/artistic values of the world’s architectural heritage.
XV
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XIV
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XVII
Organizing committee
Paulo B. Lourenço Universidade do Minho – Portugal
Claudio Modena Università di Padova – Italy
Pere Roca Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya – Spain
Scientific committee
Drazen Aninic University Josip Juraj Strossmayer – Croatia
Görün Arun Yildiz Technical University – Turkey
Luigia Binda Politecnico di Milano – Italy
Thomas Boothby The Pennsylvania State University – United States of America
Giovanni Carbonara Università di Roma “La Sapienza” – Italy
Ario Ceccotti Istituto per la Valorizzazione del Legno e delle Specie Arboree – CNR – Italy
Dina D’Ayala University of Bath – United Kingdom
Miloš Drdácký Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics – Czech Republic
Gavrilovic Pedrag University St. Cyril and Methodius – Macedonia
Pietro Alessandro Vigato Progetto Finalizzato Beni Culturali – CNR – Italy
Maurizio Indirli Ente per le Nuove Tecnologie, l’Energia e l’Ambiente – Italy
Giorgio Macchi Università di Pavia – Italy
Christiane Maierhofer BAM, Federal Institute for Material Research and Testing – Germany
Roberto Meli Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México – Mexico
Ioanna Papayianni Aristotle University of Thessaloniki – Greece
Andrew Powter ICOMOS International Wood Committee – Canada
Michael Schuller Atkinson-Noland Associates – United States of America
Ramiro Sofronie University of Bucarest – Romania
Vito Renda European Laboratory for Structural Assessment – JRC – Italy
Miha Tomasevic Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute – ZAG – Slovenia
Koenraad van Balen Katholieke Universiteit Leuven – Belgium
Elizabeth Vintzileou National Technical University of Athens – Greece
The papers are published in the form submitted by the authors, after revision by the Scientific
Committee. The Editors are relieved of any responsibility for possible errors or disagreements.
XVII
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XVIII
Organization
Sponsors
Supporting institutions
Patronage
XVIII
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 1
Invited lectures
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XIV
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 3
S.K. Agrawal
Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, India
ABSTRACT: History of earthquakes in India demonstrates vulnerability of our heritage buildings to seismic
hazards. The recent past, devastating earthquakes in urban areas in India causing wide spread damages to
these buildings, disruption of services and damage to environment have been of great concern; the experiences
have prompted to carry out in-depth studies and come out with solutions and policies which will go a long
way in minimizing the damages caused by seismic ground motions. In this context, seismic rehabilitation of
heritage structures is a new discipline coming up in India and should be given a top priority. The paper discusses
threadbare the problems associated with the heritage buildings, their modes of failures, rehabilitation actions
and strategies. A recently accomplished restoration of a prestigious building damaged during 26th January 2001,
Bhuj earthquake of India is discussed in the paper as a case study. Also, it is highlighted that there is urgent need
of instrumentation, experimentation and monitoring of heritage structures to study the dynamic properties and
safeguard them from future ground motion.
1 INTRODUCTION – HISTORY OF INDIAN India has been the seat of a great civilization for
HERITAGE BUILDINGS 5000 years or more. The ancient civilization has its
manifestation in the sphere of religion, art, literature,
Nearly 5000 years ago, on the lush green banks of river music and sculpture – all these having been imprinted
Indus, man started making sculptures from stones. In into the various monuments constructed through ages.
fact, he wanted to give shape to his own creativity. The country is dotted with plethora of monuments,
It was the copper age, iron had not appeared on the which include temples, Buddhist stupas, churches,
scene. He did not have fine chisel or sophisticated mosques, rock-cut caves, minarets, palaces and forts.
tools, but that did not deter him. He chose relatively Many of these monuments are of considerable antiq-
softer rocks such as limestone and sandstone for mak- uity dating back to 1000 years or more.
ing small statues. These creative people lived in twin The evolution of construction techniques is related
cities of Mohenjodaro and Harappa, in the Indus valley, to the gradual assimilation of knowledge of using
now in Pakistan, one of the oldest records of its kind in construction materials of various types in a given
India. These were the earliest urbanized colonies of the environment. The earliest construction practice was
Indian subcontinent. The great civilization left behind confined mainly to the use of bricks and wood, and
large monumental examples of carvings and construc- due to their low durability, the well-preserved her-
tion skill. The artisans used either rocks and bricks itage buildings of such kind prior to 3rd century BC
or carved out temples and caves in rocks. These Her- are rarely found. However, the remains found in the
itage buildings are mute testimony in adobe, rubble, Mohenjodaro site of Indus valley civilization (3000
stone or brick of the ceaseless efforts of mankind to BC) indicates use of shaped and dressed blocks of
express his social and religious feelings. The progress polished marble for building purposes.
of human civilization can be traced from the varied The use of rocks by Emperor Ashoka (273–237 BC)
artifacts, motifs and artistic imagery carved in her- as huge monolithic pillars and railings added a new
itage buildings. These monuments not only reflect the dimension to the building history of India. Revolution-
rich cultural life of the ancient and medieval people ary thoughts and dynamic approach in utilizing in situ
but also show their technical skill in engineering con- rock or the rock-mass gave birth to the rock-cut archi-
struction and profound knowledge in the selection of tecture in India, which now holds a glorious record of
sites, judgement of foundation conditions and choice having nearly 12,000 rock-cut structures like shrines,
of construction material. chaityas and monasteries etc. constructed between 3rd
3
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 4
4
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 5
5
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 6
6
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 7
Figure 12. 125 years old St. Paul Cathedral Church cracked
with partial collapse of tower. 3 SEISMIC REHABILITATION – AN
OVERVIEW
7
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 8
range: from non-engineered dwellings built without heritage structure and at the same time ensuring struc-
any technical skills to the most modern buildings. tural safety against external actions i.e. earthquakes.
Because all the earthquakes in recent years occurred in Heritage structures are defined as all those which merit
rural or semi-urban environments and because most of special care on account of their individual historical or
the deaths were caused by collapse of non engineered architectural importance, or their significance as sur-
structures, the attention most of the time is diverted viving representatives of an earlier tradition. But the
to repair/rehabilitation of these construction and thus very definition is ignored and seismic rehabilitation is
trivializing entire rehabilitation process. The engineers done with a syndrome known as cover-up of damage
and builders started strengthening buildings, as they syndrome. This is put into practice after every deadly
deemed appropriate, even though most of them did earthquake all around the world. The engineers try to
not have a prior experience of seismic issues. cover-up the damages that appear in structural system
The seismic rehabilitation of existing structures is and the associated paraphernalia. It is a quick and low-
the most challenging task and one has to take advice cost solution but precarious one. It is advocated that
of an expert instead of doing it oneself. Seismic since the structure withstood the earthquake only with
rehabilitation in its strict sense calls for three kinds some cracks, there is no problem, which leads into
of improvement in the structure under consideration ignoring the extent & pattern of damage as well as its
i.e. Repair only visual or cosmetic modifications are influence on a possible future seismic loading, which
made, Restore structural repairs such as rebuilding of could be fatal for the structurally degraded heritage
cracked walls, stitching of cracks, grouting, placement structure. These antiseismic interventions also present
of reinforcement etc. are made such that the orig- a notable impact in the constructive reality of histori-
inal performance of the structure are restored, and cal construction, and calls for precise awareness of the
Retrofit structural modifications such as jacketing, original structure and by structural choices, which are
external ties, buttresses, addition of shear/infill walls, knowingly consistent.
bracing & anchorages are made such that a higher Design and realization of the interventions for
performance of the structure is achieved than that of seismic rehabilitation should actually be character-
original structure. However, the seismic rehabilitation ized by concurring specialistic and multidisciplinary
has been used very loosely in the field. The cosmetic contributions, which ought to allow to take deci-
repairs are often confused with seismic rehabilitation. sions so as to safeguard of historical, cultural and
Seismic rehabilitation is to be carried out by structural architectonic values is ensured in conjunction with
engineer and requires proper planning and engineer- the protection of both the construction itself and
ing judgment. Firstly, the structure is to be evaluated the human lives potentially involved from structural
for its seismic resistance and then depending upon the instability. Generally speaking the problem of seis-
requirements, it is to be rehabilitated. Seismic evalua- mic rehabilitation of heritage building differs radically
tion of existing buildings in itself is a tedious task and from the problem of ordinary structures. Here the
has been new in Indian scenario. There is no standard- emphasis is on preservation of their aesthetic and his-
ized document available for the said purpose.There has torical values and then structural safety. As per Venice
been meager data available on the structure retrofitted Charter (UNDP/UNIDO, 1984), the seismic rehabili-
for their seismic resistance. The common methods in tation of heritage structures must take into account the
our country are to use traditional practices such as following:
repair of cracks, stitching, guniting, jacketing etc. It
– Respect for original material and authentic docu-
has been experimentally verified that these techniques
ments
do not add to the strength and ductility and in turn
– Respect to the valid contributions of all periods to
render the structure precarious. We are actually car-
the building
rying out repairs instead of strengthening. The newer
– Replacements of missing parts must integrate har-
techniques such as wrapping, addition of new frames,
moniously with the whole, but at the same time must
shear walls, bracing, introduction of energy dissipation
be distinguishable from the original
devices, base isolation etc. are never tried despite of
– Additions can not be allowed except in so far as
the fact that they perform well during earthquake and
they do not detract from the interesting parts of the
have been introduced all over the globe successfully.
building, its traditional setting and its relation with
This is due to lack of awareness amongst engineers as
the surroundings
regards seismic rehabilitation is concerned.
– The use of traditional techniques and materials are
So far, the discussion was not specific to heritage
clearly preferable for seismic rehabilitation.
structures. The problems get further complex when
heritage structures are to be rehabilitated for their Modern techniques and materials are admissible
improved seismic resistance. Here the goal is mani- where adequate capacity cannot be ensured by tra-
fold, the seismic rehabilitation means is to preserve ditional techniques. In this case durability and com-
and reveal the aesthetic and historical values of the patibility of the interventions should be adequately
8
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 9
proven; otherwise, the modern techniques and mate- The following methodology is presented here for
rials should be used only in a manner that will permit seismic rehabilitation, which is based on elastic
easy corrective action at a later date if necessary. method of analysis and is broken into three stages
Stage I – Develop knowledge of as built conditions:
4 SEISMIC REHABILITATION – Step 1: Study of soil conditions at the site.
METHODOLOGY Step 2: Measurement of actual geometry of building
and its components.
Any rehabilitation strategy is case specific and has to Step 3: In-situ non-destructive and destructive testing
be dealt separately in a manner that it alleviates seis- to estimate actual strength of building
mic deficiency from the structure under consideration. materials & components.
To adopt cost-effective and appropriate retrofitting Step 4: Tests to estimate material degradation,
scheme, quantitative seismic evaluation of building is condition of the structure, extent of corrosion
prerequisite. Evaluation is a complex process, which to carefully estimate their available diameters
has to take not only the design of building but also and verify the size, number and spacing of
the deterioration of the material and damage caused reinforcing bars etc.
to the building, if any. The difficulties faced in the
seismic evaluation of a building are manifold. There is Stage II – Analysis & Verification Stage:
no reliable information/database available for existing Step 5: Preparation of 3-dimensional model of
building stock, construction practices, in situ strength structure, using measured geometry, and
of material and components of the building. The material properties.
seismic evaluation mainly relies on set of general eval- Step 6: Estimation of design lateral force on building
uation statements, since analytical methods to model using code specific design response spectra
the behavior of buildings during earthquake defining for 5% damping or site-specific response
response spectra of structure are too complex to handle spectra, if available.
with the generally available tools and calls for rigorous Step 7: Application of design lateral force on
engineering seismological exercise. The unavailabil- 3-D model to determine stress-resultants
ity of a reliable estimate of earthquake parameters, to (i.e. axial forces, shear forces, bending
which the building is expected to be subjected during, moments) in respective members &
its residual life poses another challenge. Probabilis- determination of displacements etc.
tic approach to evolve needful parameters, would call Step 8: Determination of member capacities with
for elaborate studies. Hence, for preliminary appraisal, actual cross section geometry & material
the ground motion parameters available in the respec- properties as per respective codes (It is based
tive codes may be at the macro level. As regards the on permissible stresses in flexure,
effect of local soil conditions, which are known to compression, tension and shear) and
greatly modify the earthquake ground motion, expe- Demand/Capacity ratios of members.
riences of ground accentuation and data generated Step 9: Identification of deficient members or
through collateral studies on site response should be deficiency in lateral stiffness of the structure
considered. Seismic evaluation procedure is a com- if any and verification of the damages actually
parison between some measures of the demand that incurred in the structure.
earthquake place on a structure to a measure of the
capacity of the building to resist. Evaluation is a com- Stage III – Retrofit Stage:
plex process involving number of steps like visit to Step 10: Identification of suitable retrofitting
the site and data collection, selection of either the gen- technique to rectify the deficiencies.
eral set of evaluation statements; conduct of follow-up Step 11: Estimation of the new member sizes, stiffness
field work; structural analysis for seismic evaluation etc. for the proposed scheme, and/or the
of building; characterizing seismic capacity, determine new members required.
seismic demand and verify performance in light of Step 12: Re-analysis of building to confirm the ade-
global response limits, component acceptability and quacy with the proposed retrofit techniques.
conceptual approval. Step 13: If strength and stiffness requirements are
The Demand/capacity ratio (DCR), thus evaluated satisfied, then the proposed retrofit scheme
is measure of earthquake resistance of a building. The may be adopted, else other more appropriate
DCR less than unity indicate the building is safe for retrofit schemes may be identified and steps
respective stresses under consideration. However, any from 10 are to be repeated.
DCR exceeding one indicates that the building is vul-
nerable to earthquake hazard as per respective codal The above approach is based on elastic proce-
provisions. dure and does not include failure patterns, ductility
9
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 10
and, therefore, can be used as a first cut method fall and assuring a complete load path. The connectiv-
for retrofitting design. The non-linear analysis and ity deficiencies are within load path: wall out-of-plane
pushover analysis approaches such as one outlined in connection to diaphragms; connection of diaphragm to
ATC-40 can also be used for stage II and stage III. vertical elements; connection of vertical elements to
foundations; connection of foundation to soil.
10
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 11
11
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 12
12
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 13
There are number of non-linear analytical design 2000. Jabalpur Earthquake 22 May, 1997, A geoscientific
tools are available for seismic evaluation and study, GSI Spl. Pub. No. 51, Geological Survey of India,
retrofitting of existing structures, even then many July, 2000, India.
structures are evaluated using relatively simple force- 2001. Bhuj, India Earthquake Reconnaissance Report,
2002 Earthquake Spectra, July, 2002, Supplement A to
based methods that have little or no explicit consider- Volume 18.
ation of realistic displacement demands from ground 2002. Investigation of Earthquake Resistance of Multi-
motion, displacement compatibility among dissimi- storeyed Buildings and Recommending Seismic Retro-
lar elements, non-linear response, failure modes etc. fitting Measures, CBRI Report, Roorkee, India.
There is need to bench mark these procedures so that Abrams, D.P. & Costley, A.C. 1996. Seismic evaluation on
results obtained are reliable, consistent. unreinforced masonry buildings, Eleventh World Confer-
Code specified values of seismic coefficients and ence on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, June
response spectra cannot be simply extended to heritage 23–28, paper no 976.
buildings while deciding the seismic action on these Agrawal, S.K. 2000. Strong motion array as response of
layered elastic medium, Ph.D. thesis, Department of
structures. The characteristics of the ground motion Earthquake Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology,
expected at the site must be taken into account and Roorkee, India.
site-specific response spectra are to be generated. Par- Agrawal, S.K. 2000. Force Centre: A New Concept
ticular attention is required for the heritage buildings in SMA Data Analysis, ASC 2000, Symposium on
founded on very soft or liquefiable soils. Seismology, Earthquake Hazard Assessment and Earth
Despite of advances in the field of modeling, Interior Related Topics, October 10–12, 2000, Tehran.
experimentation and understanding the subject of seis- Agrawal, S.K., Chourasia, Ajay & Parashar Jalaj 2001.
mic rehabilitation, published guideline and standards, System Identification of Eight Storied Steel Framed
engineer must continue to temper their decisions Structure, Advances in Structural Dynamics and Design
(ASDD), January 9–11, 2001, SERC, Madras, India.
with experience and judgement, primarily based on Agrawal, S.K., Chourasia, Ajay, Parashar Jalaj, & Dutta,
past experiences of failures of real structures under Jayanta 2001. Experimental Investigations on Earth-
earthquake loading. quake Resistance and Retrofitting Measures of Masonry
Seismic rehabilitation of heritage structures is Houses – A Review, International Conference on Civil
a highly specialized operation and requires close Engineering (ICCE – 2001), 23–25 July, 2001, Indian
cooperation of experts of archaeology, architec- Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
ture, surveying, structural engineering, geo-technical Agrawal, S.K. & Vipul Prakash 2001. An Engineering
engineering and chemical engineering and should be Approach for Earthquake Source Modelling, Interna-
supported by computation methods and well-equipped tional Conference on Seismic Hazard with particular
reference to Bhuj Earthquake of January 26, 2001,
laboratories. 3–5 October, 2001, New Delhi, Govt. of India, Deptt.
Of Science & Technology, India Meteorological Deptt,
India.
Agrawal, S.K. & Chourasia, Ajay, 2002. Seismic safety
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS aspects for historical monuments, Strategy & methodol-
ogy for conservation of heritage buildings & monuments
The author is grateful to Shri V.K. Mathur, Director, in India, CBRI, Roorkee, April 4–5, India.
CBRI for granting permission to write the paper. I am Agrawal, S.K., Chourasia, Ajay & Parashar, J. 2002. Seis-
indeed indebted to Dr. Paulo B. Lurenco, Porutgal, mic Evaluation & Retrofitting of Existing Building –
A Case Study, Proc. of 12th Symposium on Earthquake
Dr. Claudio Modena, Italy and Dr. Pere Roca, Spain Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee,
for giving me such an opportunity and sharing the India.
expert knowledge on the subject. The information Agrawal, S.K., Chourasia, Ajay, Parashar, J & Dutta, J. 2002.
gathered from web sites such as www.nicee.org, Experimental Investigation on Earthquake Resistance and
www.eeri.org, www.asi.nic.in, www.intach.org, www. Retrofitting Measures of Masonry Houses, Advances in
gsdma.org is gratefully acknowledged. Concrete & Construction Technology, Publication –3,
Interline Publishing, Bangalore, India
Agrawal, S.K., Chourasia, Ajay 2003. A pragmatic approach
for Seismic Risk reduction of Megacities in India, Indian
REFERENCES Habitat & Infrastructure – need for innovative approach,
24–26 September, CBRI, Roorkee, India.
1986. Guidelines for earthquake resistant non-engineered Agrawal, S.K. & Chourasia, Ajay 2003. Rehabilitation of
construction, The International Association for Earth- RCC Structures – How Far From Reality, Int. Conf. on
quake Engineering, Japan. ‘Innovative World of Concrete 2003, Indian Concrete
1992. Indian monument through ages, Oxford & IBH Pub- Institute, Pune, September, 2003, India.
lishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. Agrawal, S.K., Chourasia, Ajay & Parashar, J. 2003. Seis-
1999. Vulnerability Atlas of India, Building Materials & mic Vulnerability of Jabalpur Urban Area, Department of
Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi, India. Science & Technology Report, Govt. of India, India.
13
chap-01 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 14
Agrawal, S.K., Chourasia, Ajay 2004. Estimation of Seis- IS-13920 1993. Ductility Detailing of Reinforced Concrete
mic Vulnerability of Buildings in Delhi, World Congress Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces – Code of Practice,
on Natural Disaster Mitigation, Institution of Engineers Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
(India), New Delhi, India, Vol. 2, 159–171. IS-13935 1993. Repair and Strengthening of Buildings –
ATC-21 1988. Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Guidelines, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
Potential Seismic Hazards: A Handbook, Applied Tech- Jain, S.K., Murty, C.V.R., Dayal, U., Arlekar, J.N. &
nology Council, Redwood city, CA, USA. Chaubey, S.K., 2001. A Field Report on Structural and
ATC-28 1991. Development of Recommended Guidelines Geotechnical Damages Sustained During the 26th Jan-
for Seismic Strengthening of Buildings Phase: Issue uary, 2001 M7.9 Bhuj Earthquake in Western India,
Identification and Resolution, Applied Technology Coun- NICEE Report, Kanpur, India.
cil, Redwood city, CA, USA. Mathur, V.K. & Agrawal, S.K. 2001. Safety and Security
ATC-40 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete of Tall Buildings in India, CTBUH London Conference,
Buildings – Vol. I & II, Applied Technology Council, Council on Tall Buildings in Urban Habitat, December,
California Seismic Safety Commission, Redwood city, 2001, London.
California. Mathur, V.K., Agrawal, S.K. & Chourasia, Ajay 2003.
FEMA-172 1992. NEHRP Handbook for the Seismic Reha- Demand-CapacityApproach for Seismic Rehabilitation of
bilitation of Existing Buildings, Federal Emergency RC Residential Buildings, 9th International Conference
Management Agency, Building Seismic Safety Council, on Civil & Structural Engineering Computing (CIVIL-
Washington, D.C. COMP 2003), Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
FEMA-178 1992. NEHRP Handbook for the Seismic Mathur, V.K., Agrawal, S.K. & Chourasia, Ajay 2004. Micro-
Evaluation of Existing Buildings, Federal Emergency zonation Studies as impacted by recent earthquake in
Management Agency, Building Seismic Safety Council, India, World Congress on Natural Disaster Mitigation,
Washington, D.C. Institution of Engineers (India), New Delhi, Vol. 2, 81–91.
Gavarini, C. & Bruno S. 1996. Towards a complex approach Meli, R. & Ramirez, R.S. 1996. Considerations on the
to preservation and seismic protection of monuments, seismic safety of historical monuments, Eleventh World
Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper no. 2087.
paper no. 2088. Murty, C.V.R. 2002. Quantitative Approach to Seismic
Giuffre, A. & Carocci, C. 1996. Vulnerability and mitigation Strengthening of RC Frame Buildings, Proc. on Seismic
in historical centers in seismic areas – criteria for the for- Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings, Indian Institute
mulation of a practice code, Eleventh World Conference of Technology, Mumbai, India.
on Earthquake Engineering, paper no. 2086. Penelis, G. Gr., 1996. Techniques & materials for structural
Holmes, W.T. 2000. Risk Assessment & Retrofit of Exist- restoration, Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake
ing Buildings, Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper no. 2089.
Engineering, paper no. 2826. SP-22, 1982. Explanatory Handbook on Codes for Earth-
IS-456 2000. Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of quake Engineering, Bureau of Indian Standards, New
Practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. Delhi, India.
IS-1893 2002. Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design
of Structures, Part-1: General Provisions and Buildings,
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
14
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 15
M. Tomaževič
Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
ABSTRACT: Historic masonry buildings have been built on the basis of tradition and experience without taking
into consideration specific rules for earthquake resistance. On the basis of the analysis of earthquake damage
observations, the main causes of damage are determined and adequate measures to improve the seismic behavior
developed. In order to assess the seismic resistance, mechanical properties of masonry materials should be
determined by appropriate testing methods. Experimental research is needed to evaluate the observed mechanisms
and propose numerical models for seismic resistance verification. Experimental research and testing is also
needed to provide information regarding the efficiency of measures and technologies developed to improve the
seismic resistance and obtain the data needed for seismic redesign. Experiences obtained at Slovenian National
Building and Civil Engineering Institute in Ljubljana are discussed as an example.
15
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 16
2.1 Testing
Stone, mixed stone-and-brick and sometimes brick-
masonry are the most common materials used for the
construction of historic buildings, with lime mortar as
the bonding material. Stone-masonry walls are usu-
ally built of two outer layers of uncoursed stone, with
an inside infill consisting of a mix of smaller stones
with lime mortar. Because of the method of construc-
tion of stone-masonry, many voids exist in the walls, Figure 1. Lateral resistance test of a brick-masonry
uniformly distributed over the entire volume. specimen, cut from the building, in the laboratory.
16
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 17
Standardized testing procedures are used in the vertical load to simulate the working stress state in the
case of vertical compression tests. In the case of lat- wall is kept constant, whereas the horizontal load in the
eral resistance tests, however, the seismic situation of form of induced displacements is applied according
loading is simulated by subjecting the specimens to to an appropriate pattern which simulates the cyclic
constant vertical load, whereas the horizontal loads character of seismic loading. Since the removing of
are applied cyclically, acting either in both or in one specimens of adequate size from the building and their
direction only. transport to the laboratory is usually a time consuming
In the laboratory conditions, vertical and horizontal and costly procedure, the tests on the existing masonry
loads are applied by means of hydraulic actuators. The are carried out on the site. At an appropriate location
in the building, the specimen to be tested is separated
from the surrounding masonry by vertical cuts on both
sides. In order to prevent accidental collapse of the
floor in the case of collapse of the specimen, the floor
structure is supported with posts. A system of steel
connectors and hydraulic jacks is provided to induce
lateral loads.
17
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 18
by in-situ testing of actual materials, the γM values, plaster and opening the walls, the value of partial
as required for the new construction, can be further safety factor γM = 1.2 can be considered;
reduced. This is also suggested by Eurocode 8-1-4: – In the case where the characteristic values are
Strengthening and repair of buildings. obtained in the literature, but no identification tests
Considering the correlation between the results have been carried out, the value of partial safety
of earthquake resistance analyses and earthquake factor γM = 1.7 should be taken into account in the
damage observations, carried out after the past seismic resistance evaluation.
earthquakes, and following the guidelines given
Mean values of in-situ test results are taken into
in Eurocode 8-1-4, the following recommendations
account as characteristic values of shear modulus G
regarding the values of partial safety factor γM to be
and modulus of elasticity E.
taken into account in the redesign of historic masonry
As has been found, the mechanical properties of
buildings, can be proposed:
stone-masonry strongly depend on the structure of the
– In the case where in the given region and for a wall and the way of construction. It has been also
given type of masonry the mechanical properties found that the values vary from region to region, so
are determined either by in-situ tests or in the that individual values are not generally applicable.
laboratory by testing specimens, taken from the Whereas a number of data exist about the val-
existing masonry, the value of partial safety factor ues of the tensile strength and shear modulus, not
γM = 1.0 can be considered in seismic resistance many data are available about the compressive strength
verification; and modulus of elasticity. In particular, the results of
– In the case where the characteristic values are in-situ tests are missing, difficult to carry out because
obtained in the literature, as for example the val- of relatively large forces needed to test sufficiently
ues given in Tables 1 and 2, and identification of a large specimens. As the test results indicate, the com-
given type of masonry is carried out by removing pressive strength of stone-masonry is relatively low.
Since even in the existing state the walls of stone-
masonry houses do not possess a normal reserve in
Table 1. Characteristic values of tensile strength ftk and vertical load-bearing capacity, any removal of parts of
design values of shear modulus G of stone-masonry. the walls in the case of enlarging the existing, or mak-
ing new door and window openings, or any adding of
Type of masonry ftk (MPa) G (MPa) new stories to the existing building, may cause severe
problems.
Two leaf, uncoursed lime stone, 0.02 60
poor lime mortar, rural
Two leaf, mix of uncoursed quartz 0.08 100 2.3 Resistance to seismic loads
sandstone, slate and lime-stone,
lime mortar, urban As the analysis of earthquake damage and subsequent
Two leaf, mix of uncoursed quartz 0.12 40 experiments indicate, three types of failure modes of
sandstone, slate, lime-stone and brick; walls, shown in Figure 4, can be observed, depend-
lime mortar, homogeneous, urban ing on the geometry of the wall (height/width ratio),
Two leaf, uncoursed lime stone, 0.05 80 quality of materials as well as boundary restraints and
poor lime mortar, rural dwellings loads acting on the wall.
Two leaf, uncoursed lime stone, 0.07 170
Shear failure is a typical failure mode in the case
lime mortar, public buildings of historic brick and stone masonry buildings. It takes
place where the principal tensile stresses, developed in
the wall under a combination of vertical and horizontal
loads, exceed the tensile strength of masonry materi-
Table 2. Characteristic values of compressive strength fk als. Characteristic diagonal cracks develop in the wall
and design values of modulus of elasticity E of stone-
masonry.
just before the attainment of maximum resistance.
18
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 19
For the case of the shear failure, the resistance of • Maximum resistance, determined by maximum
the walls is calculated by (Turnšek & Čačovič 1971): resistance Hmax , attained during test, and corre-
sponding displacement dH max .
• Ultimate state, determined by maximum displace-
ment attained during test dmax and corresponding
resistance Hd max .
Obviously, the initial slope of the idealized envelope
where: is best defined with a secant stiffness at the forma-
Hs,w = shear resistance of the wall, tion of cracks, which is called effective stiffness of the
Aw = area of the horizontal cross section of wall Ke = Hcr /dcr . Ultimate ductility factor µu , which
the wall, defines the displacement (rotation) at which the wall
σo = compressive stress in the wall, does not resist any more to lateral seismic load, is
b = coefficient of distribution of shear stresses. defined as a ratio µu = du /de . Usually, the displace-
ment at which the resistance degrades to 80% of the
During the lateral resistance tests, the relationships maximum, is considered as ultimate, du .
between the cyclically acting lateral seismic load and
displacements (rotation) of the wall are obtained in
the form of hysteresis loops (Fig. 5). To use the infor-
mation obtained by testing in the calculations, the 3 SEISMIC BEHAVIOR AND REDUCTION OF
envelope of the experimentally obtained hysteresis DESIGN SEISMIC LOADS
loops is idealized as a bilinear envelope (Fig. 6).
Three limit states are defined in the envelope: 3.1 Observations and numerical models
• Crack limit, determined by displacement dcr and The analysis of damage caused by earthquakes to his-
resistance Hcr at the formation of the first signif- toric stone- and/or brick-masonry buildings in urban
icant cracks in the wall, which change the slope of and rural nuclei, indicated that cracks at the corners
the envelope. and at wall intersections, which occur as a result
of insufficient connections and lack of connection
between the walls and floors, represent a character-
istic damage pattern. Sometimes, separation of walls
and even out-of-plane collapse occurred. Also, many
times, despite the favorable structural layout of those
buildings in plan and good connection of walls, the
quality of masonry materials was not good enough to
spare the walls from diagonal cracking, disintegration,
and ultimate collapse.
Although the structural typology of masonry build-
ings varies in different regions, their damage resulting
from earthquakes can be classified in an uniform way.
The following typical types of damage can be identi-
Figure 5. Typical lateral load–displacement hysteresis fied by the analysis of the observed earthquake damage
loops, obtained during laboratory test. patterns:
– Cracks between walls and floors;
– Cracks at the corners and at wall intersections;
– Out-of-plane collapse of perimetral walls;
– Cracks in spandrel beams and/or parapets;
– Diagonal cracks in structural walls;
– Partial disintegration or collapse of structural walls;
– Partial or complete collapse of the building.
The analysis of damage patterns can clearly iden-
tify the weak and good points of different structural
systems. On the basis of damage analysis, the fail-
ure mechanisms of individual structural walls and
the entire structural system can be defined. On the
basis of the observed mechanism, forces that develop
Figure 6. Idealization of experimental resistance envelope in the structural system during earthquakes can be
with bilinear relationship. determined. On the basis of such analysis, causes of
19
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 20
20
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 21
where:
ag = seismicity depending design ground acceleration,
S = soil factor,
η = damping correction factor,
q = structural behavior factor.
The resulting values of BSC d,u for different expec-
Figure 10. Construction of story resistance envelope on the ted intensities of earthquakes (seismic zones) and firm
basis of bilinear resistance envelopes of walls. soil are given in Table 3.
As the analyses and observations after earthquakes
indicate, structural strengthening of historic masonry
buildings is needed in most cases. Whereas the tying
of the walls should be provided in every case, the expe-
riences show that the strengthening of stone-masonry
walls by cement-grouting is unavoidable in the zones
of moderate and high seismicity, whereas in the zones
of low seismicity, the decision whether the stone-
and/or brick-masonry walls need to be strengthened
or not, depends on the quality of existing masonry.
As the experience indicated, by applying the usual
technical measures to historic masonry buildings, the
values of the coefficient of seismic resistance CSRu ,
i.e. the ratio between the ultimate resistance Hu and
the weight of the building W, greater than 0.3 are
difficult to attain, particularly in the case of build-
ings higher than 3 stories. It would be practically
Figure 11. Correlation between experimental and impossible to attain the resistance required for the
calculated story resistance envelopes. new construction without adding new structural ele-
ments. On the other hand, however, there were many
cases observed where even stone-masonry buildings
under consideration will not resist the expected seis- resisted the earthquakes, although the calculated val-
mic loads with an acceptable degree of damage, the ues of CSRd,u were lower than required for the given
building needs structural strengthening. By using ade- seismic zone.
quate mathematical models, the weak elements of the According to Eurocode 8-1-4, the design ground
structure where the strengthening is needed, can be acceleration may be reduced in the case where the
identified. anticipated total costs of strengthening the entire build-
Normally, the same level of design seismic loads ing inventory of particular urban areas would sharply
should be considered in the redesign of historic build- increase if ag values would be raised towards the code
ings as in the case of the new construction. According required level, as well as where code required ag values
to Eurocode 8, the design seismic load in terms of the for redesign of a monument would lead to completely
ultimate design base shear coefficient BSC d,u , i.e. the unacceptable architectural alterations.
ratio between the design seismic load and weight of Taking into account the recommendations given
the building, is determined by: in Eurocode 8-1-4, it is proposed that, for practical
redesign of existing stone-masonry buildings in urban
areas, maximum allowable reduction, i.e. reduction
factor γn = 0.67 is used in the zone IX. Since there
is no reduction proposed for the zones VII and lower,
21
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 22
Table 4. Seismic resistance of typical existing the integrity of structural system during earthquakes
(ft = 0.06 MPa) and strengthened (ft = 0.11 MPa) 2-story is ensured by means of the tying of the walls at floor
stone-masonry houses in terms of coefficient of seismic levels. This only makes possible to utilize the available
resistance (CSRu = Hu /W ) in x- and y-directions. energy dissipation capacity of the structure, assumed
by structural behavior factor q.
Wall/floor area Existing Strengthened
(%) building building
Bldg.
no. x-dir y-dir x-dir y-dir x-dir y-dir 4 EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF
METHODS FOR STRENGTHENING AND
1* 12.0 9.1 0.21 0.19 0.25 0.25 REPAIR
2* 10.9 6.4 0.20 0.15 0.27 0.22
3 6.9 8.6 0.22 0.25 0.25 0.33
As the studies of earthquake damage to historic
4 12.1 11.1 0.33 0.31 0.42 0.38
5 4.7 14.6 0.17 0.33 0.19 0.47 masonry buildings indicated, the following basic
6 7.2 14.3 0.16 0.31 0.21 0.47 requirements need to be fulfilled in order to achieve
7 15.1 13.7 0.29 0.25 0.40 0.33 adequate seismic behavior:
8 10.5 9.5 0.31 0.25 0.39 0.29
– Structural integrity should be ensured, i.e. structural
9 10.5 9.9 0.23 0.26 0.31 0.34
10 10.3 10.2 0.22 0.26 0.28 0.35 walls should be adequately tied and connected, and
11 11.9 10.3 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.34 floors should be rigid enough and well anchored to
12 9.8 10.9 0.23 0.26 0.32 0.34 the walls in order to provide uniform distribution of
13 8.8 8.33 0.23 0.27 0.31 0.33 seismic loads onto the walls and prevent excessive
14 10.6 12.0 0.28 0.28 0.35 0.36 out-of-plane bending;
15 9.7 12.0 0.27 0.34 0.34 0.47 – Structural walls should be uniformly distributed
16 7.9 4.2 0.26 0.19 0.35 0.21 in both orthogonal directions as well as along the
height of the building in order to prevent torsional
* ft = 0.08 MPa for existing and 0.14 MPa for strengthened and/or other phenomena;
houses.
– Structural walls should be resistant enough to resist
the expected seismic loads;
i.e. γn = 1.00, the value of reduction factor to be used – Foundation system should be capable of transfer-
in zone of EMS intensity VIII, γn = 0.84, is a linear ring the ultimate forces developed in the upper
interpolation between the values of reduction factors structure into the foundation soil.
proposed for the zones IX and VII. The resulting
Many methods have been developed for improv-
reduced values of ultimate design base shear coeffi-
ing the resistance of historic buildings to meet these
cient to be considered in the redesign BSC d,ur are also
requirements. Not all have been experimentally veri-
given in Table 3.
fied. Different testing techniques are used for the ver-
Typical results of a recent study of seismic resis-
ification of strengthening methods. In most cases, the
tance of buildings located in the zone, where intensity
efficiency of the proposed strengthening method can
VIII earthquakes by EMS scale actually occurred in
be evaluated by testing the masonry walls either in the
the time interval of 22 years, are given in Table 4
laboratory or in-situ, using the same testing techniques
(Tomaževič et al. 2000). Most of the buildings, ana-
as in the case of the walls in the original state.
lyzed in Table 4, have already been strengthened after
However, to investigate the seismic behavior and
the earthquake, which damaged the area in 1976.
mechanism of the entire buildings, models of build-
As the observations and analysis after the subse-
ings are tested on the shaking tables. The testing
quent earthquake which occurred in 1998 indicated,
of models on simple seismic simulators has several
the seismic behavior of strengthened buildings was
advantages:
adequate.
The results of this analysis confirm the possibility – Model tests are cheaper and simpler than prototype
of reducing design seismic loads in the zones of high tests;
and moderate seismicity as proposed in Table 3, with- – Relatively simple testing facilities can be used;
out risking inadequate seismic behavior. The behavior – Global behavior and failure mechanisms can be
of historic buildings, strengthened to such level, is reliable simulated;
expected to be adequate. The buildings will not col- – Modeling techniques can be adjusted to possibilities.
lapse, but the amount of damage will be larger than in
However, this testing techniques also has disadvan-
the case of the new construction. However, the damage
tages, such as:
will still be repairable.
It should be emphasized that seismic resistance – Modeling scale is limited because of technological
verification of historic buildings for seismic loads, restrains;
given in Table 3, is only reasonable in the cases where – Structural details cannot be studied.
22
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 23
where:
q = physical quantity,
S = scale factor.
Different modeling techniques are available
(Tomaževič & Velechovsky 1992). Depending on the
basic correlations between the model and prototype
materials, complete or simple models can be tested.
If the dynamic behavior and failure mechanisms are
studied, the following general requirements need to be
fulfilled in the first place:
23
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 24
24
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 25
25
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 26
200
150 Grouted
H (kN)
100
Existing
50
0
0.0 0.7 1.4 2.1 2.8
R (%)
26
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 27
2,0
Fourier Amplitude
1,5
1,0
0,5
0,0
0 5 10 15 20
Frequency [Hz]
27
chap-02 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 28
environmental conditions (summer, winter, wet, dry) carried out and published in the last decade. The reader
or continuously. For example, settlements and tilting may find more detailed information in the referenced
of the structure are measured with geodetic methods, publications.
the propagation and/or opening and closing of cracks
with deformeters, whereas velocity transducers are in
most cases used for monitoring the dynamic effects. REFERENCES
Sometimes, the structure is also monitored in order
to verify the efficiency of structural interventions. Par- Eurocode 8. prEN 1998-3. Design of structures for earth-
ticularly, typical structures are monitored with strong- quake resistance. Part 3: Strengthening and repair of
motion accelerographs to record their response during buildings. CEN, Brussels (under development).
Eurocode 8. ENV 1998-1-4. 1996. Design provisions for
expected strong seismic events in the future.
earthquake resistance of structures – Part 1–4: Gen-
eral rules – Strengthening and repair of buildings. CEN,
Brussels, 1996.
6 CONCLUSIONS Sheppard, P. & Tomaževič, M. 1986. In-situ tests of load-
bearing capacity of walls of old masonry buildings. Proc.
The evaluation and redesign of historic masonry struc- 4th Nat. Congress on Earthquake Engineering, Vol.2,
tures to remedy and/or improve the seismic resistance Cavtat: 85–92.
cannot be made unless reliable structural diagnosis Tomaževič, M. 2000. Seismic redesign of existing masonry
had been previously carried out. In order to obtain the buildings. European Earthquake Engineering, 14 (3):
data needed for redesign, besides information regard- 59–66.
ing the type, geometry and conditions of the building Tomaževič, M., Klemenc, I. & Lutman, M. 2000. Strength-
and structural elements, quantitative data regarding the ening of existing stone-masonry houses: Lessons from
the earthquake of Bovec of April 12, 1998, European
mechanical properties of structural materials should Earthquake Engineering, 14 (1): 13–22.
be determined. In order to make a reliable struc- Tomaževič, M. 1999. Earthquake-resistant design of
tural diagnosis, in-situ or laboratory destructive and masonry buildings. London: Imperial College Press.
non-destructive tests should be carried out. Differ- Tomaževič, M. 1997. Seismic resistance verification of
ent testing techniques and methods are available for masonry buildings: following the new trends. In Peter
this purpose. However, if non-destructive methods are Fajfar & Helmut Krawinkler (eds.), Seismic Design
used, a previous calibration is necessary. Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes:
Dynamic characteristics of the building’s structural 323–334. Rotterdam: Balkema.
system may be defined by forced vibration or ambient Tomaževič, M., Lutman, M. & Weiss, P. 1996. Seismic
upgrading of old brick-masonry urban houses: tying of
vibration techniques. Sometimes, the structure is mon- walls with steel ties. Earthquake Spectra, 12 (3): 599–622.
itored so that short and long-term observations and Tomaževič, M. & Apih, V. 1993. The strengthening of stone-
measurements are performed to collect the relevant masonry walls by injecting the masonry friendly grouts.
information for structural evaluation. European Earthquake Engineering, 7 (2): 10–20.
On the basis of the analysis of observations Tomaževič, M., Lutman, M. & Velechovsky, T. 1993. Aseis-
made after earthquakes and subsequent experimental mic strengthening of old stone-masonry buildings: is
research to simulate the seismic behaviour of historic the replacement of wooden floors always necessary?
buildings on earthquake simulators, mechanisms of European Earthquake Engineering, 7 (2): 34–46.
seismic behaviour are defined and numerical models Tomaževič, M. & Velechovsky, T. 1992. Some aspects of
testing small scale masonry building models on sim-
for seismic resistance verification are developed. ple earthquake simulators. Earthquake Engineering &
On the basis of structural evaluation, decision can Structural Dynamics, 21 (11): 945–963.
be made as regards the necessary structural interven- Tomaževič, M., Weiss, P. & Velechovsky, T. 1991. The
tions. A large variety of different methods for seismic influence of rigidity of floors on the seismic behaviour
strengthening and repair of historic masonry buildings of old stone-masonry buildings. European Earthquake
have been developed. Before practical application to Engineering, 5 (3): 28–41.
buildings, however, the efficiency of these methods Tomaževič, M., Turnšek, V. & Terčelj, S. 1978. Computa-
should be experimentally verified. Reliable data about tion of the shear resistance of masonry buildings. Report
the efficiency of such methods and numerical models ZRMK-IK. Ljubljana (in Slovene).
Turnšek, V., Terčelj, S., Sheppard, P. & Tomaževič, M. 1978.
to simulate their mechanisms of action during earth- The seismic resistance of stone-masonry walls and build-
quakes, should be obtained and/or developed on the ings. Proc. 6th European Conference on Earthquake
basis of experimental research. Engineering, Vol.3, Dubrovnik: 275–282.
Turnšek, V. & Čačovič, F. 1971. Some experimental results
on the strength of brick masonry walls. Proc. 2nd Int.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Brick-masonry Conference, Stoke-on-Trent: 149–156.
28
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 29
L. Binda
Politecnico di Milano, Italy
ABSTRACT: Investigation on historic buildings is needed for different reasons. Material properties, wall con-
struction technique, hidden voids, inclusions, masonry and timber decay, structural damages, etc., are information
used for the structure safety control and for the choice of appropriate materials and techniques for repair. Non
destructive (NDT) or minor destructive (MDT) techniques are required, in order to avoid invasive tests. These
techniques need a calibration both for the testing procedure and for the elaboration software of the collected data.
At the general level of historic centres, MDT and NDT can only be applied by sampling positions representative
of a whole wall or group of constructions. In these cases the budget can be very low, but even few information
can be meaningful for the diagnosis; this can be the case of historic centres in seismic areas. The paper introduces
different strategies and different level of investigation also through some case histories.
29
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 30
UI 197 UI 198
a) UI 199
b)
Sub-horizontal courses
Figure 3. Example of: (a) simple isolated building; (b) row Irregular courses
building; (c) complex building.
Figure 4. Prospect and section morphologies.
A remedy to the failure can only be an appropriate
design for intervention based on a deep knowledge the results obtained can be unclear and even mislead-
of the building typology and of the materials and ing (Binda et al., 1992) e.g. the stress values given by
structure behaviour, reached through an appropriate a flat jack test can appear unreliable if the designer
investigation. chooses the test points without any hypothesis in mind
or does not realise that the value obtained is a local one.
A design for complex and detailed investigation can
2 WHY INVESTIGATION IS NECESSARY be proposed if it concerns a complex building with
many unsolved problems concerning: geometry, hid-
After the above premises it is necessary to give an den features, high variability in materials and types of
answer remembering that: damage, a complex evolution of volumes and struc-
tural damages along the time (Binda et al., 2000b).
– the knowledge of the old building construction tech-
In some cases the investigation can be limited to
nique and materials was lost during the last century,
geometrical and damage survey and to few laboratory
therefore it has to be rebuilt;
and in situ tests.
– buildings belong to construction typologies (Fig. 3)
Different level of investigation have then to be
which are different according to the building use
defined and guidelines can be given for each level.
and to the local materials;
– masonry is a composite with different section mor-
phology: one-two-three leaves, regular irregular, 3.1 Historic centres or urban aggregates
made with brick and/or stones (Fig. 4);
– masonry should not be considered similar to the The necessity of investigation at urban level becomes
concrete; they are extremely different; very clear when dealing with urban areas under risk
– analytical models should be calibrated by experi- of exceptional events as earthquake, floods, eruptions,
mental investigation and applied appropriately to fires, or longterm events as slides, subsidiance, etc.
check the structural safety. In very old or antique centres where the buildings
can be abandoned, misused or without maintenance
for long-time, the knowledge on the behaviour of even
3 WHICH LEVEL OF INVESTIGATION largely distributed building typologies in the same area
are lost or forgotten. In the case of earthquake or subsi-
Investigation on site and in laboratory has an economic dence this knowledge at the level of similar typologies
impact on the budget available for the preservation in the centre can be recovered by learning from the past
intervention. events which are the most diffused types of damage
If the level and type of investigation procedures (e.g. collapse mechanisms, crack pattern etc.) (Binda
is not clear and appropriate to the necessity of the et al., 2004).
building knowledge the available funds can be misused In those cases only the collection of geometry,
(Binda et al., 1999). material properties and type of damage characteris-
Furthermore if the questions to be answered by the tic for each building typology together with simpli-
investigation are not clear to the designer, the use of fied matematical models can be the base to study
30
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 31
If the aim is the preservation of buildings which have Figure 5. Crack pattern survey of a Montesanto building
complexity of volumes due to their evolution in dif- damaged by the earthquake.
ferent subsequent times or monuments as palaces,
churches, towers, arenas, etc., then the inspection and
investigation have to be punctual and produce a deep
knowledge of all the details of the structural and non
structural parts.
A methodology of investigation has nevertheless to
be applied to the knowledge of the building, from the
basic operations to the more complex.
These operations can involve: geognostic inves-
tigation, geometrical, topographic, photogrammetric
surveys, laboratory tests on materials sampled to be
representative of the material used in the building, non Figure 6. Typical crack pattern of a pillar under heavy
destructive testing on the presence of humidity, voids, compressive stresses.
multiple leaf in masonries, slightly destructive testing.
Tests on timber structures, coring and visual inspec- is not available. The knowledge of the geometry is not
tions in depth, on site diffused mechanical test, etc. only used from the architectural point of view, but also
archive historical documentation and on site precise to understand the distribution of damage and decay,
observation of the building evolution, should also be and is necessary for the structural analysis.
carried out (Binda et al., 2000b). If the building is complex (row building, agglom-
erate), then the evolution of its volume should be
detected by careful visual inspection to see the signs
4 BASIC INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE (lack of wall connection in the prospects at contact
beween two parts of the building built in different
In order to give an appropriate methodology which can times, etc.). This is an important operation particu-
be applied with effectiveness taking into account the larly in seismic areas when studying the vulnerability
previous section 3, it is possible to state some priorities of the sites (Binda et al., 2004).
in the applications of investigation procedures. Essential for the safety of the building is certainly
Some operations must be always conducted due to the crak pattern survey reported on plan and prospects.
their extreme importance. Cracks, out of plumb, loss of material, etc. when
Visual inspections, photographic campaign and col- reported on the geometrical survey can give a clear
lection of data on the site and on the single building indication of the phenomena interesting the structural
from historic archives have to come first in order to movements (Figs. 5, 6).
understand the environment and the building features. The crack pattern can be in seismic areas also
Then the geometrical survey, a map of the materials compared to a damage abacus (Fig. 7).
used, a decay map, the individuation of the structural
elements, the crack pattern survey and the foundation
and soil survey. 4.2 Survey of masonry texture and of the
morphology of the wall section
4.1 Geometrical and crack pattern survey
This survey is very important for two reasons: (i) to
A design for intervention cannot be prepared if the understand the mechanical behaviour of the wall in
geometry of the structural and non structural elements order to avoid unexpected damages under earthquake
31
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 32
45 Church plaster
Church mortar
40 Tower plaster
35 Tower mortar
Civil Building plaster
30 Civil Building mortar
[%] 25
20
15
10
0
SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO Na2O K2O SO3 Loss on
ign.
abacus.
140
Scaglia dry Conglomerato dry
120
Stress [N/mm2]
40
32
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 33
nents as: (i) the Schmidt hammer rebound test; (ii) 600
4
33
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 34
34
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 35
35
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 36
500
400
300
200
Sonic test
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1.65 m
100
0 250 cm
SC-D1 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 1.50 m 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
21 20 19 18 17 16 15 1.35 m 2100
2000
1900
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 1.20 m
1800
1700
Timber frame
1600
1500
1400
1300
1200
PILLAR D1 - side B 1100
1000
900
800
700
33.13 82.78 37.63 600
500
400
d 300
20.9
200
100
0
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
a c 2100
2000
1900
1800 Figure 19. Localisation of a wooden element in a frescoed
145.62
101
1700
700
1 2 b 600
500
3 4 5 6 7 400
300
153.54 200
100
0
Pillar horizontal section
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
280 cm
Wall section
cm
Figure 18. Crocifisso Church at Noto (Italy): results of
12 99
sonic tests applied to a pillar.
5.3 Georadar
presence of moisture and hopefully the presence of
Among the techniques and procedures of investigation multiple-leaves in stone masonry.
which have been proposed in these last years, georadar The method is based on the propagation of short
seems from one hand to be most promising, from the electromagnetic impulses, which are transmitted into
other to need a great deal more of study and research the building material using a dipole antenna. The
(Lenzi et al., 1997), (Binda et al., 1998), (Binda et al., impulses are reflected at interfaces between mate-
1999a). When applied to masonry, the applications of rials with different dielectric properties, i.e. at the
radar procedures can be the following: (i) to locate surface and backside of walls, at detachments, voids,
the position of large voids and inclusions of different etc. When the transmitting and receiving antennas,
materials, like steel, wood, etc. (Fig. 19); (ii) to qualify which are often contained in the same housing, are
the state of conservation or damage of the walls; (iii) moved along the surface of the object under inves-
to define the presence and the level of moisture; (iv) to tigation, radargrams (colour or grey scale intensity
detect the morphology of the wall section in multiple charts giving the position of the antenna against the
leaf stone and brick masonry structures (Fig. 20). travel time) are produced. Measuring the time range
Georadar seems to be a powerful tool to detect between the emission of the wave and the echo, and
the presence of voids and structural irregularities, the knowing the velocity of propagation in the media it
36
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 37
37
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 38
ƒFEM = 0.585 Hz ƒFEM = 0.709 Hz ƒFEM = 2.455 Hz ƒFEM = 2.726 Hz ƒFEM = 5.698 Hz
ƒEMA = 0.586 Hz ƒEMA = 0.708 Hz ƒEMA = 2.456 Hz ƒEMA = 2.731 Hz ƒEMA = 5.706 Hz
38
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 39
(a)
(b) and bricks and stones), simple on site tests (flat jack,
sonic tests, drilling of cores, etc.).
Figure 25. Comparison between the state of Campi In the case of complex buildings their evolution in
(Umbria) in 1835 (a), and in 1997 (b). time must be detected on site or through archive doc-
uments in order to study their vulnerability (Fig. 28).
Prevision of possible collapse mechanisms, analyt-
ical models for prevision of vulnerability of the centre
and of the buildings.
Even if low cost and simple some on site NDT
or minor DT can also be powerful at the level of
urban investigation, in order e.g. to classify differ-
ent masonry types and hence different building types
(Fig. 29).
39
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 40
2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
Stress [N/mm ]
Stress [N/mm ]
2
2
1.0 1.0
b)
Figure 29. (a) Some results obtained with single and dou-
ble flat-jack tests on the external wall of a church, of a bell
tower and of a civil building; (b) representative results of the
diagonal surface sonic measurements.
coring,
survey of the masonry section
extraction by
and
local demolition
construction details
in situ measurement
of the local single flat-jack
state of stress
40
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 41
Obviously the designer has to remember that a sin- Abbaneo, S., Berra, M., Binda, L., 1996. “Pulse velocity test
gle technique is frequently not enough to have the to qualify existing masonry walls: usefullness of wave-
knowledge of defects, inclusion, voids in the structure form analyses”, 3rd Conf. Non Destructive Evaluation
but frequently techniques have to be used as comple- of Civil Structures and Materials, Boulder - CO, USA,
mentary; this of course implies an appropriate budget 81–95.
Aerojet General Corporation, 1967. Investigation on sonic
reserved for investigation; therefore all the operations
testing of masonry walls, Final Report to the Dept. of
must be carefully chosen. General Services of Architecture and Construction, State
of California.
ASTM, 1991. Standard test method for in situ compres-
7.3 Investigation for maintenance
sive stress within solid unit masonry estimated using the
Lack of maintenance for a long time can be as destruc- flat-jack method, ASTM C 1196-91, Philadelphia, ASTM.
tive as exceptional events (earthquakes, floods) in a Bartoli, G., Blasi, C., Gusella,V., 1992. “Il sistema di monitor-
long range. Fig. 33 shows the effects of the envi- aggio della cupola del Brunelleschi: analisi dei dati rilevati
(1988/1990)”, IV National Congress ASSI.R.C.CO., Prato,
ronment on a historic building abandoned for twenty
Italy, 445–455.
years. It has also to be remembered that most of the col- Binda, L., Anzani, A., Mirabella Roberti, G., 1997. “The
lapses occurring during earthquakes concern buildings failure of ancient Towers: problems for their safety assess-
which had no maintenance for a long time. ment”, Int. IABSE Conf. on “Composite Construction –
Therefore once the buildings has been repaired and Conventional and Innovative”, Zurich, 699–704.
starts functioning a project for maintenance must be Binda, L., Baronio, G., Gambarotta, L., Lagomarsino, S.,
prepared stating minimum investigation and moni- Modena, C., 1999. “Masonry constructions in seismic
toring operations in due times in order to fulfil the areas of central Italy: a multi-level approach to conser-
predicted service life. vation”, 8NAMC 8th North American Masonry Conf.,
Austin, USA, 44–55.
The same investigation procedures mentioned in the
Binda, L., Cardani, G., Penazzi, D., Saisi, A., 2003.
previous sections can be applied. They should be NDT “Performance of some repair and strengthening tech-
or MDT possibly easy, repeatable and at low cost. niques applied to historical stone masonries is seismic
areas”, ICPCM a New Era of Building, Cairo, Egypt,
18–20/2/2003, 2, 1195–1204.
Binda, L., Cardani, G., Saisi, A., Modena, C., Valluzzi, M.R.,
8 CONCLUSIONS 2004. “Multilevel Approach to the Analysis of the Histori-
cal Buildings: Application to Four Centers in Seismic Area
An attempt has been made in the previous sections to Finalised to the Evaluation of the Repair and Strengthen-
point out the real necessity of a deep knowledge of the ing Techniques”, 13th International Brick/Block Masonry
building before any intervention for its preservation Conference, RAI Amsterdam, July 4–7, CD-ROM.
is carried out. This knowledge in the case of historic Binda, L., Falco, M., Poggi, C., Zasso, A., Mirabella
Roberti, G., Corradi, R., Tongini Folli, R., 2000. “Static
buildings has been lost in the past century due to the
and Dynamic Studies on the Torrazzo in Cremona (Italy):
use of new materials in the building industry. The only the Highest Masonry Bell Tower in Europe”, Int. Sympo-
way architects and engineers have to follow in order to sium Bridging Large Spans: from Antiquity to the Present,
recover the lost information is to carry out an appro- Istanbul, Turkey, 100–110.
priate investigation, thanks also to the recent develop- Binda, L., Gatti, G., Mangano, G., Poggi, C., Sacchi
ments of sophisticated investigation procedures. Landriani, G., 1992. “The collapse of the Civic Tower of
41
chap-03 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 42
Pavia: a survey of the materials and structure”, Masonry Gentile, C., Saisi, A., Binda, L., 2002. “Dynamic investi-
International, 6(1), 11–20. gation of a historic masonry Bell Tower”, 6th Interna-
Binda, L., Lenzi, G., Saisi, A., 1998. NDE of masonry struc- tional Masonry Conference, London, 4th–6th November,
tures: use of radar test for the characterisation of stone 192–199.
masonry, Non Destructive Testing and Evaluation Int., Lenzi, G., Ludwig, N., Rosina, E., Saisi, A., Binda, L., 1997.
31(6), 411–419. Analisi di tessiture murarie mediante termografia e geo-
Binda, L., Lenzi, G., Saisi, A., 1999a. “Radar Investiga- radar, V Congresso Nazionale ASS.I.R.C.CO, Orvieto –
tion for Diagnosis of Historic Buildings: Application to Italy, 142–146.
Stone Masonries”, 8th Int. Conf. on Structural Faults and Niederwanger, G., 1997. “Structural Repair of Damaged Old
Repair, London, CD-ROM. Bell Towers Based on Dynamic Measurements”, 5th Int
Binda, L., Lombardini, N., Guzzetti, F., 1995. “St. Vitale in Conf. on Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of
Ravenna: a survey on materials and structures”, Int. Conf. Historical Buildings STREMAH97, S. Sebastian, Spain,
on Historical Buildings and Ensembles, invited lecture, 447–456.
Karlsruhe, Germany, 113–124. Padaratz, I.J, Forde, M.C., 1995. “Influence of Antenna
Binda, L., Lualdi, M., Saisi, A., Zanzi, L., Gianinetto, M., Frequency on Impulse Radar Surveys of Concrete Struc-
Roche, G., 2003. “NDT applied to the diagnosis of his- tures”, 6th Int. Conf. on Structural Faults and Repair,
toric buildings: a case history”, 3-Day Int. Conf. Structural London, 2, 331–336.
Faults & Repair, London, 1-3/7/2003, CD-ROM. Penazzi, D., Valluzzi, M.R., Cardani, G., Binda, L.,
Binda, L., Mirabella, G., Abbaneo, S., 1994. “The Diagnosis Baronio, G., Modena, C., 2000. “Behaviour of His-
Research Project”, Earthquake Spectra, 10(1), 51–170. toric Masonry Buildings in Seisimic Areas: Lessons
Binda, L., Mirabella Roberti, G., Guzzetti, F., 2000a. Learned from the Umbria-Marche Earthquake”, 12th Int.
“St. Vitale in Ravenna: A Survey on Materials and Brick/Block Masonry Conf., Madrid, Spain, 217–235.
Structures”, Int. Symposium Bridging Large Spans: from Rossi, P.P., 1982. Analysis of mechanical characteristics of
Antiquity to the Present, Istanbul, Turkey, 89–99. brick masonry tested by means of in situ tests, 6th IBMaC,
Binda, L., Saisi, A., Tiraboschi, C., 2001. “Application of Rome, Italy.
Sonic Tests to the Diagnosis of Damage and Repaired Rossi, P.P., 1997. “Possibilities of the Experimental Tech-
Structures”, Non Destructive Testing and Evaluation Int., niques for the Structural Analysis of Historical Construc-
34(2), 123–138. tions”, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain, 24–46.
Binda, L., Saisi, A., Tiraboschi, C., 2000b. “Investigation Schuller, M.P., Berra, M., Atkinson, R., Binda, L., 1995.
procedures for the diagnosis of historic masonries”, Con- “Acoustic Tomography for Evaluation of Unreinforced
struction and Building Materials, 14(4), 199–233. Masonry”, 6th Int. Conf. on Structural Faults and Repair,
Binda, L., Tiraboschi, C., 1999. “Flat-Jack Test as a Slightly London, 3, 195–200.
Destructive Technique for the Diagnosis of Brick and Valle, L., Zanzi, L., Binda, L., Saisi, A., Lenzi, G., 1998.
Stone Masonry Structures”, Int. Journal for Restoration “Tomography for NDT applied to masonry structures:
of Buildings and Monuments, Int. Zeitschrift fur Bauin- sonic and/or EM methods”, 2nd Int. Arch Bridge Conf.,
standsetzen und Baudenkmalpflege, Zurich, 449–472. Venezia, 243–254.
Binda, L., Tiraboschi, C., Tongini Folli, R., 1998b. “On site Valle, S., Zanzi, L., Lenzi, G., Bettolo, G., 1997. “Struc-
and laboratory investigation on materials and structure of ture Inspection with Radar Tomography”, Int. Coll. on
a Bell-Tower in Monza”, 2nd Int. RILEM Conf. on Reha- Inspection and Monitoring of the Cultural Heritage,
bilitation of Structures, Melbourne, Australia, 542–556. IABSE-ISMES, 223–230.
42
chap-04 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 43
A. Ceccotti
Trees and Timber Institute, IVALSA-CNR, Florence, Italy
ABSTRACT: A methodology for evaluating the actual load-bearing performance of an ancient timber construc-
tion is given in this paper based on a simple non-destructive approach. Materials and methods are illustrated and
discussed. Examples are given emphasizing the key points of the decision making procedure. Final considerations
with particular reference to the “minimum intervention” principle conclude the work.
43
chap-04 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 44
44
chap-04 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 45
Table 2a–2b. Strength classes and the “Magic” table, assignment of visual grades and species
according to CEN/TC 124.215. Table gives coniferous timbers and source combinations
matching strength class C24 profile.
in N/mm2
fm,k 14 16 18 22 24 27 30 35 40
fc,0,k 8 10 11 13 14 16 18 21 24
fc,90,k 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4
fc,0,k 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 25 26
fc,90,k 4,3 4,6 4,8 5,1 5,3 5,6 5,7 6,0 6,3
fc,k 1,7 1,8 2,0 2,4 2,5 2,8 3,0 3,4 3,8
in kN/mm2
E0,mean 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 13 14
E0,05 4,7 5,4 6,0 6,7 7,4 8,0 8,0 8,7 9,4
E90,mean 0,23 0,27 0,30 0,33 0,37 0,40 0,40 0,43 0,47
Gmean 0,44 0,50 0,56 0,63 0,69 0,75 0,75 0,81 0,88
in kg/m3
ρk 290 310 320 340 350 370 380 400 420
Strength classes and characteristic values according to EN 338. Coniferous species and poplar.
Table 2b.
Grading rule
Strength publishing country Species
class (Grading standard) Grade commercial name Source
CNE Europe: Central, North & Eastern Europe, NNE Europe: Northern & North eastern
Europe, NC Europe: Northern and Central Europe.
grading rules, when the verification would fail at first uncertainties about the material still to be provided
approach, an appeal should be given to the structure. are much less because the material is already there
We do not want to touch here the issue of possi- and we can see it in place. Moreover, load standards
ble reduced safety coefficients due to the fact that the are changed over the years increasing snow loads, for
structure is already existing (modern calculation codes example, where our structure does exist from centuries
are thought for not-yet existing structures). Therefore with no interest in human discussions.
45
chap-04 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 46
46
chap-04 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 47
Figure 3b.
Figure 3e.
Figure 3c.
Figure 3a–3e. Simple models are very important in determining rapidly, even in a rough way the load distribution within
the structure. This approach is usually conservative, because does not take into account possible re-distribution effects.
More advanced models allow a finer evaluation of load distribution and give a better load-path with a reduction of peak
forces.
47
chap-04 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 48
Figure 4c.
Figure 4a.
Figure 4d.
Figure 4b.
Figure 4e.
Figure 4a–4e. In some cases when the mechanical behaviour is very complicated to determine, tests should be performed,
and/or highly sophisticated models used. This does facilitate verification and allows the adoption of very essential strengthening
solutions. Tables 5a and 5b are a synopsis of the Master thesis of Ms Angela Bevilacqua on “Strengthening of 16th Century
wood-masonry building in Wismar”, 1998, University of Florence, Italy.
48
chap-04 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 49
Figure 5a–d. Panchia (Trento, Italy) bridge. Accurate modelling coupled with in situ load tests allowed to identify the best
way to preserve the cultural authenticity of the bridge without compromising users safety. To reduce car traffic induced bridge
vibration the deck planks were simple inclined at 45◦ respect to traffic direction.
49
chap-04 9/9/2004 8: 5 page 50
Table 4. REFERENCES
Density E0 Fm Failure determining Kuipers, J. 1986. Effect ofAge/or Load onTimber Strength. In
Beam (kg/m3 ) (N/mm2 ) (N/mm2 ) defect(s) Proceedings of CIB W18 meeting, Paper 19-6-1. Florence,
Italy.
T1 480 8689 25.0 Ring shake, checks Ceccotti, A & Uzielli, L. 1989. Reliability of Ancient Timber
T2 483 8273 28.0 Ring shake, checks Structures. In G. Tampone (ed) Proceedings of II National
T3 516 18266 39.6 Checks Italian Congress on Wood Restauration. Firenze: Nardini
T4 464 13048 25.8 Ring shake, checks (in Italian).
T5 487 12906 44.8 Slope of grain, knot Uzielli, L. 1995. Restoring timber structures – Repair and
T6 505 10355 33.9 Localised decay strengthening. STEP 2 Timber Engineering, lecture D4.
T7 464 8102 30.9 Knots, diffuse decay Centrum Hout, The Netherlands.
T8 513 14013 47.0 Checks Bonamini, G. 1995. Restoring timber structures – Inspection
T9 498 11747 38.5 Knots and evaluation. STEP 2 Timber Engineering, lecture D3.
T10 478 12243 29.4 Checks Centrum Hout, The Netherlands.
T11 469 7104 15.3 Diffuse decay Giordano, G. & Ceccotti, A. & Uzielli, L. 1999. Timber
T12 449 11630 30.1 Checks Engineering. Milano: Hoepli (in Italian).
50
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 51
P.B. Lourenço
University of Minho, Department of Civil Engineering, Guimarães, Portugal
ABSTRACT: The present paper presents the works recently carried out at the Cathedral of Porto as a case
study of a difficult intervention that challenges current recommendations for the architectural heritage. The
historical information is briefly reviewed and the general conservation approach for the different works is
addressed. Afterwards, the aspects regarding the strengthening of the towers are treated with more detailed and
the diagnostics of a chapel, incorporating the usage of limit analysis for safety evaluation, is presented.
51
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 52
52
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 53
of the square, a tower-house with medieval appear- to carry out the Works, which are only superficially
ance was built from scratch in 1940, with the purpose from an author and much more from the collection of
of hosting the Museum of the History of the City. professionals.
The scenic effect that resulted from the restoration Preliminary diagnosis was very brief and, therefore,
produced a kind of representation of the past and the the design project was not conceived in detail. On the
past in this way represented understated the representa- contrary, the project was a directive kept open and con-
tion. A kind of an alternative past or a commemorative tinuously adapting to the unforeseen, which is often
allegory. the case in historical buildings, where the anatomy
is processed by successive approximations and under
3 BASIS FOR CURRENT WORKS the lens of different disciplines. Of course, dissection
as a knowledge tool cannot be a part of a modern
3.1 The rehabilitation of the restoration as a intervention.
program In this case, the lack of adequate preliminary
diagnosis, which is in opposition with modern method-
The building, as it is found today, is hybrid and ologies, was compensated with an intense mul-
frozen in a perpetual past, where re-combinations tidisciplinary activity during the execution period
or architectural redesign seem hardly acceptable in (2002–2004), supported by research, consultancy and
the near future. It is with the signs of anomalies and expertises in various fields. In the contingency of
the absence of formal borders that the memory of the works that had started already, the reunion of efforts
building is found and that the violation of authentic- resulted in a process of effective cooperation, with
ity, which is lacking, is understood. This process of the advantage of permanent in situ approaches and
learning is also a process of increasing identification discussions.
and love between the authors and the building. Only
then, it is possible to understand that the fake self of
the cathedral, as a result of the previous restoration, is
today the real self of the cathedral, transformed into 4 SELECTED ASPECTS OF THE
a monument. This is a forged identity that cannot be INTERVENTION
considered a minor representation of the strength of a
specific cultural period. The restoration carried out in the first half of the
Therefore, the governing thread of the program 20th century used traditional construction techniques.
of the current intervention is to rehabilitate the Some of the structural deficiencies encountered were
restoration. The aim is to reactivate, rehabilitate and then solved with the dismantling and rebuilding of
upgrade the competence, where competence is under- unstable parts, and with the replacement of dete-
stood as the performance capacity of the structures, riorated or damaged granite, with poor mechanical
the materials, the shapes and also the space, assumed performance.
as a support for functionality. The sole concession to the industrial technology is
The intervention in the building was organized the use of Portland cement, used as a common binder
around five operations: removal of infestations, con- for repointing masonry joints, rendering walls and
solidation, water-tightness, ventilation and protection. several reparations that during and after the restora-
And, finally, also monitoring. tion works, aimed at solving the following issues,
From the functional point of view, the use was without success: waterproofing of surfaces, glue
strengthened, which can be summarized by more and reconstitute volumes, stabilize cracks and stop
“cathedral” and less “museum”. In fact, several rooms movements.
had lost a meaning, either due to degradation or It is precisely with respect to the above-cited issues
because they were changed into a kind of “museum” that deeper interventions have currently been carried
without a clear program, where loose artifacts of out, some without visible effects and other with the
sacred art were exposed as an ornamentation of open- addition of parts, as in the strengthening of the tow-
ings and empty spaces. Therefore, where possible, the ers. Therefore, the architects in charge of the works
aim was the rehabilitation of the function for which tend to joke about the fact that the only interven-
the spaces were created and the reintegration of the tion being carried out is the strengthening of the
artifacts in their context. This program did not reduce towers.
but even increased the part of the compound open to Next, see Figure 4 to Figure 12, some of the aspects
the visitors. of the works being carried out are briefly reviewed.
The works are mostly concentrated in the towers, and
the roofs and façades in the west and south wings.
3.2 Dialogue as a methodology
Diagnosis and strengthening of the towers and the
A constellation of professions has been mobilized Saint Vincent Chapel are addressed in a separate
and the dialogue has been applied as a methodology section.
53
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 54
5.1 Introduction
Figure 7. Repair of grilles included control of anchors and
A key aspect in the behaviour of ancient towers is that new anchors, and measures for proper rainwater flow.
the collapse process usually excludes the possibility of
ductile behaviour. In fact, there are hardly any possibil-
ities of internal force redistributions between different historical structures. But this is not often the case, see
critical sections, and failure of a single section is usu- Binda & Anzani (1997).
ally sufficient to provoke the entire collapse of the A tower is usually a result of the need to create a
structure. This intrinsic feature leads to a high struc- symbol or the need to challenge structural stability
tural risk in tall masonry towers, because increasing (and nature itself ). The interpretation of this desire to
height means large vertical loads and high compres- build higher, and simultaneously to reduce the safety of
sive stresses at the base. Therefore, it seems easy to structures, was left to ancient builders in the context of
accept that masonry towers should possess a higher almost no scientific basis. It is striking that the major-
safety margin than the values normally found for other ity of the ancient high towers in Italy, e.g. in Pavia
54
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 55
Figure 9. Repair of finishings included repointing of of the first bricks and collapse. In the other cases, col-
masonry joints with lime mortar and repainting of wood with lapse occurred without previous warning. In Pavia, the
traditional oil paints. collapse occurred in a few seconds and provoked four
casualties (Macchi 1992).
Therefore, it seems unquestionable that the high
and Bologna, are no longer present, Macchi (1998). structural risk of high masonry towers justifies detailed
The reality is that only a few of these structures sur- studies and carefully planned remedial measures in
vived until today, due to collapses, destruction due to case of doubt about their behaviour. Several recent
lightening and even demolitions (often by precaution case studies have been reported, Modena et al. (2001),
and concern of eminent collapse). In the recent his- Valluzzi et al. (2003) and Lourenço (2004).
tory, there are well-known cases of collapse, namely
the Campanile in Venice (1902), the Civic Tower in
5.2 Description
Pavia (1989) and the Santa Maria Magdalena Bell-
Tower in Goch (1993). In the case of Venice, collapse The main façade was built between 1176–1200 (cen-
was gradual, with signs of distress two days before tral part) and 1229–1325 (towers), see Figure 13.
collapse. Also, 20 minutes elapsed between the fall The towers evolved into a Bell-tower (North) and a
55
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 56
56
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 57
57
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 58
are not replicated in the South tower, see Figure 20. 5.5 Remedial measures
For these reasons, it is believed that the damage is
As it arises from the history and survey, the towers
not recent and the helicoidal staircase belongs to the
seem to have been damaged in the past and rebuilt
structure of an older tower.
(particularly the South tower). The (re)construction
Additionally, also the following damage is noted:
seems to have been carried out under deficient exe-
– Steel structure in the cupolas of the towers with cution conditions, no particular well defined structure
advanced corrosion, see Figure 21a; and using improvised construction details. In addition,
58
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 59
59
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 60
Figure 23. Pinnacles and balustrade removal and place- Figure 24. Roof of Saint Vincent Chapel: (a) aspect of
ment with stainless steel dowels and ties: (a) general view; restoration works; (b) aspect of vault infill with rubble.
(b) removal of the centre pinnacle; (c) aspect of stainless steel
elements and placement.
the chapel vault was filled with rubble resulting from
old demolitions see Figure 24. Also, and as usual in
The other works carried out include injection of the
several historical constructions, the timber roof was
main cracks with lime based mortar grout, repointing
partly supported by the vault, using later added struts.
all joints with two selected lime mortars (a traditional
The issue addressed here is the stability of the vault
mortar for the filling and a more durable lime mortar
and the convenience of the removal of the infill.
for the finishing), protect against corrosion (the two
ties in the North tower were kept in place) or replacing
all existing iron. 6.1 Survey
The structure consists of a barrel vault with an approx-
5.6 Monitoring Plan imate thickness of 0.25 m and a span of 6.8 m. On the
Given the cultural importance of the building and the North side, the cloister acts as a buttress but on the
significant damage in the South tower, a monitoring South side no buttresses are present. Even if the South
system was planned and installed. wall (1.70 m) is thicker than the North wall (1.30 m),
The system includes four waterproof crackmeters out-of-plumb movements outwards are clearly visible
in the largest cracks, two strain gages for the new ties, in the former, up to 1.5% (or 0.10 m at the springer of
two biaxial clinometers to measure the tilting of the the vault), see Figure 25a.
tower, as well as temperature, humidity and wind sen- Nevertheless, as the vault presents only minor
sors. The system includes a GSM interface for remote cracking, see Figure 25b, it was believed that the vault
monitoring. has been built after the wall deformation. As it will be
confirmed next, the vault replaces a previous timber
roof at the same level.
6 SAINT VINCENT CHAPEL
6.2 Structural Analysis
The Saint Vincent Chapel is located next to the South
wing of the Cathedral cloister. During the restoration A plane model was adopted for the structural analysis
works of the roof, it was found that the extrados of of the barrel vault. The analysis was carried out using
60
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 61
61
chap-05 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 62
existed at the level of the vault, before the construction Lourenço, P.B. 1998. Experimental and numerical issues in
of the vault and the new roof at a higher level. the modelling of the mechanical behaviour of masonry.
In: P. Roca et al. (ed) Structural Analysis of Historical
Constructions, p. 57–91, Barcelona: CIMNE.
Lourenço, P.B. 2001. Analysis of historical construc-
7 CONCLUSIONS tions: From thrust-lines to advanced simulations. In:
P.B. Lourenço, P. Roca. (ed) Historical constructions
The present paper addresses the works recently car- 2001, p. 91–116, Guimarães: University of Minho.
ried out at the Cathedral of Porto as a case study. The Lourenço, P.B. 2002. Computations of historical masonry
methodology that governed the complete set of works constructions, Progress in Structural Engineering and
is addressed and the conservation and repair works Materials 4(3): 301–319.
are briefly addressed. Two aspects are treated in detail, Lourenço, P.B. 2004. Strengthening design of the clock-tower
namely the towers and the Saint Vincent Chapel. in Mogadouro Castle, Portugal. Report 04-DEC/E-07,
The towers exhibit severe global damage includ- Guimarães: University of Minho.
Macchi, G. et al. 1992. The collapse of the Civic Tower in
ing cracking, crushing and separation between leaves Pavia: A survey of the materials and structure. Masonry
and also local damage in the cupolas, pinnacles and International 1.
balustrades. The global damage seems mostly due to Macchi, G. 1998. Seismic risk and dynamic identification in
water infiltration, deficient conception of the struc- towers. In Monument 98 – Seismic performance of monu-
ture, ancient damage due to lightening and changes ments; Proc. intern. workshop, Lisbon, 12–14 November
in the structures of the towers. For the purpose of 1998, p. K.3-K.17, Lisbon: DGEMN, LNEC and JRC.
increasing the structural performance, a rigid frame Modena, C., Valluzzi, M.R., Tongini Folli, R., Binda, L. 2001.
of stainless steel profiles and a set of long, inclined Design choices and intervention techniques for repairing
anchors have been designed to provide a confining and strengthening of the Monza cathedral bell-tower. In
Structural faults & repair 2001; Proc. 9th intern. conf.
ring. In addition, new ties and stitching of the external and exhibition, London, 4–6 July 2001. CD-ROM.
leaves were also included when necessary. The local Orduña, A., Lourenço, P.B. 2003. Non-linear cap model for
damage is mostly due to corrosion of iron elements, limit analysis of masonry structures, J. Struct. Engrg.,
which have been replaced by stainless steel elements ASCE 129(10): 1287–1430.
or have been protected. Valluzzi, M.R., da Porto, F., Modena, C. 2003. Structural
The chapel exhibits a significant overload due to a investigations and strengthening of the civic tower in
rubble infill resulting from previous demolitions and Vicenza. In: Structural faults & repair 2003, Proc. 10th
the external wall presents moderate out-of-plane dis- intern. conf. and exhibition, London, 1–3 July 2003.
placements. From the diagnostics, it was possible to CD-ROM.
safety prescribe the removal of the infill (approxi-
mately seven tons). This operation allowed to confirm
that the present vault is not contemporary to the walls
and the external wall deformation is stabilized.
REFERENCES
62
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 63
P. Roca
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
ABSTRACT: This paper presents some reflections on the role of structural modelling in the study of ancient
structures and its relationship with other sources of knowledge, such as inspection, history, and monitoring. The
relation between structural modelling and historical information is considered with special focus. A discussion is
carried out on the capabilities which, ideally, numerical models and methods of analysis should include to obtain
a fruitful connection with historical information. In particular, the need for procedures allowing the simulation
of historical aspects such as the construction process, later structural alterations or long-tem physical damaging
phenomena is justified in the light of particular case-studies.
63
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 64
64
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 65
65
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 66
2.3 Inspection
Long term
Activities related to both superficial or deep inspec-
tion provide qualitative information on the present ∆T
condition of the building, encompassing geometry,
morphology, construction details, material properties,
alterations, historical repairs, and existing damage.
Inspection provides the essential information needed amplitude
to select the primary hypotheses on which the model
is based. It also provides the amount of information
needed to build a structural model in detail.
In some cases, realizations coming from inspection
may permit a certain calibration of the model. This cal-
ibration may be achieved through the comparison of
possible predictions of the model (in particular, those
∆T
related to deformation or damage) with effects actu-
ally observable in the building. For instance, a first
illustration of the validity (or inadequacy) of a model
may be achieved by simulating the effect of gravity
loading and then comparing the predicted distribution Figure 4. Monitoring as a window over historical time
of cracking and deformation with their real manifesta- allowing possible insight on active processes long-term
tions in the building. However, this type of calibration damaging processes.
may be hardly undertaken in practice because of the
uncertainty on the actions having historically impacted
on the building and the superimposition of effects information useful for the study and restoration of
involved in damage. Even if such aspects remain ancient constructions (see Roca et al., 2003, for a
uncertain, results from inspection should be utilized larger discussion on this issue).
to check the model and see that the predictions are However, characterizing long-term damage is a
not in frontal contradiction with reality. For instance, challenging task due to the slowness of the pro-
a model producing cracks, due to dead load, in parts cesses involved and the fact that they may be masked
which have remained intact from the construction of by more apparent, short-term variations caused by
the building itself, should obviously be subjected to present actions. In order to characterise incremen-
reconsideration. Inspection provides, at least, the pos- tal, long-term processes, monitoring must be designed
sibility of a preliminary test for essential compliance to allow a clear distinction between the reversible or
with reality. cyclic components of the parameters measured, on
the one hand, and the irreversible, cumulative compo-
nents developing in the long term, on the other hand.
2.4 Monitoring
In turn, the possibility of recognising both types of
Monitoring provides quantitative information on the components demands the following requirements:
response of the structure across a short and contempo- Monitoring must be extended to a period long
rary period of time. Monitoring can be understood as enough to cover the entire duration of acting cyclic
a small window opened over the long term processes actions; since annual variations of temperature must
taking place in the otherwise inaccessible historical be considered in any case, the minimum acceptable
time (Fig. 4). In particular, monitoring may allow period is a complete year. Additional years will be of
for the recognition of incremental processes in a term value to confirm the tendencies observed and appraise
reasonable for engineering purposes and thus provide their possible evolution in the long term.
66
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 67
67
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 68
CONCLUSIONS
Figure 6. Role of the different activities in the study of an ancient construction. Conclusions on the condition of the building
stem from the validation of hypotheses adopted to elaborate a model, once validated or calibrated in the light of available
empirical or experimental evidence obtained from historical research, inspection and monitoring.
in fact not really needed and even unsuitable for the progress of damage), possible architectural or struc-
conservation of the structure. tural modifications caused on the building, or because
Results from non-validated modelling may be sim- of the particular seismic features of the new earthquake
ply in contraction with meaningful historical facts. (as in the case of the Basilica of St. Francis of Assisi,
For instance, the analysis may predict that an exist- see Croci, 1998).
ing and well preserved dome can not resist a major Even if history is regarded as the main and best
earthquake having, in fact, occurred several times dur- source of evidence, complementary experimental and
ing the life-span of the building; if anything, this mere numeric analyses are needed to actually understand, in
fact indicates that the model is not entirely correct a rationale way, the condition and needs of the building.
and is still requiring further calibration. Although the The problem of this second way or reasoning is in the
hypotheses are (willingly or unwillingly) present, no lack of hypotheses actually being checked.
previous effort has been devoted to gathering empir- To our understanding, an adequate, scientifically
ical evidence and using it to validate or calibrate the based approach must consider both the structural mod-
model before exploiting it for predictive purposes. elling, as the recipient of the hypotheses to be checked,
Another debatable approach consists of drawing the and the evidence coming from the inspection (pro-
conclusions from the only knowledge of history. Cer- viding qualitative evidence on the present condition
tainly, the mere realization that a building is standing of the building), historical research (as a source of
offers an empirical hint of its viable stability under qualitative evidence of the past performance of the
the action of gravity. However, the actual meaning of construction the true scale of space and time) and
this fact can only be completely interpreted in the light monitoring (providing quantitative information of the
of a (conceptual, analogical, numerical) model of the current performance at a local time interval).
structure. As shown by some real cases, ancient struc- The need for a multidisciplinary approach stems not
tures having been stable for centuries may collapse in a only from the variety of aspects involved by the study
sudden manner without providing previous visible evi- but also from the wish to apply the scientific method
dence of their precarious condition (as in the case of the in a consistent and profitable way (Fig. 6).
Civil Tower of Pavia or Noto Cathedral, see Macchi,
1998, Croci, 1998, and Binda et al., 2003). Similarly,
the fact that a building has been able to resist some 4 REMAINING SPACE FOR UNCERTAINTY
historical earthquakes is not enough to conclude on its
capacity to resist possible new earthquakes. The safety It must be recognised that even if modelling (as recip-
of the building in the case of a future earthquake is not ient of the hypotheses) is used in combination with
guaranteed due to the structural decay (caused by the empirical evidence, and even if a model or a method
68
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 69
69
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 70
process based on the comparison of the numerical or empirical evidence must be only extended to an
predictions with the evidence available on the real engineering level. Aiming at a physically exact or
response of the building. extremely close agreement between model and reality
In all this discussion, the requirement for the agree- may be sterile or prohibitively expensive for most pur-
ment between numerical results and experimental poses. Required cost and term must keep reasonable
and consistent with the importance and complexity of
the building and the resources available.
Figure 9. View of Küçük Ayasofya Mosque in İstanbul, compared with the deformation predicted by the analysis for gravity
loading (amplified × 2300).
70
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 71
It must be noted, however, that a realistic simulation Effects due to historical actions may also con-
of historical actions or long-term damage processes tribute very significantly to the continuous increase
is still requiring additional experimental studies and of deformation. Extraordinary actions such as large
numerical developments. earthquakes may produce important lesions and irre-
Faculties (1) to (3) may provide meaningful results versible deformations (Fig. 8). Low-intensity earth-
in the frame of a non-linear method of analysis quakes or repeated occurrences of hurricane-force
accounting for both the geometric and material con- wind may act cumulatively to cause ever increasing
tributions to a non-linear response. On the one hand, damage and deformation. Daily or annual thermal
large displacements may affect the equilibrium of slen- cycles individually have a minimal effect; however, a
der masonry constructions; this can be observed in certain, irreversible increment of deformation may be
slender arches or in more complex skeletal systems. produced after each cycle, thus contributing over very
On the other hand, masonry shows a highly non- long periods of time to a meaningful increase in overall
linear response, even for moderate stresses, due to deformation. It must be noted that the effects of cyclic
cracking in tension or other associated phenomena. actions do not dissipate with time, but may increase in
Consequently, methods of analysis must be equipped an accelerate way as the construction becomes more
with appropriate procedures for the description of the and more damaged.
equilibrium of the deformed structure, and also with The damage affecting the construction, which in
realistic constitutive equations for the simulation of normal conditions always increases due to the men-
the mechanics and strength of masonry. The capac- tioned and other possible causes, will, in turn, enlarge
ity to account for these effects is of large importance the sensitivity of the construction towards a vari-
since they act in a coupled way with the aforemen- ety of actions. This situation contributes to con-
tioned historical effects (1) to (3). For instance, and stantly increasing (never-mitigating) deformation at
from a theoretical point of view, additional flexibil- the long-term or even accelerated long-term deforma-
ity due to cracking and progressive deformation due tion which, in the worst case, can lead to the collapse
to creep might cause a very important increment of of the construction. Since the more persistent action
the eccentricity of the normal force at certain sections is gravity, it is not strange that such constant increase
of a pier or an arch, leading, ultimately, to a differed of deformation may manifest as a monotonic, non-
collapse under the only action of gravity. asymptotic amplification of the initial deformed shape
Simpler calculation methods, such as linear elastic due to dead load.
analysis or limit analysis based on the plastic the- Ideally, the numerical model used should be able
orems may be very useful for the study of ancient to simulate most of the present or historical actions
constructions and may really contribute, when handled having affected the construction; it should also per-
by an experienced analyst, to face complex problems. mit sequential analysis to simulate the construction
The above discussion is in no case oriented to dis- process and the latter possible structural alterations or
credit the use of these simpler tools in the study of repairs. Having specific constitutive equations avail-
ancient constructions. However, the possible simula- able for long-term creep of masonry or stone-like
tion of complex actions and responses encompassing materials, such as the one proposed by Papa and
historical time calls certainly for more sophisticate Taliercio (2003), is of utmost importance for the
approaches. purpose here referred.
Long-term phenomena leading to progressive deteri- Important effects related to deformation can be
oration during historical periods must be accounted attributed to the construction process. The construc-
for in order to understand the existing damage. As tion of historical structures lasted during large periods
observed apropos of the study of recent collapses (Papa amounting to several decades or centuries. The con-
and Taliercio, 2003, Binda, et al. 2001, 2003), the struction included long intermediate stages during
effect of creep under constant stress, at the long term, which the structure was stabilized by means of pro-
may induce significant, cumulative damage in rock- visory supports or was forced to develop resisting
like materials. As mentioned by Binda et al. (2001), mechanisms not entirely consistent with its structural
accumulation of damage (eventually leading to col- arrangement and design. It is likely that the struc-
lapse) may occur for stress values significantly lower tures showed larger mobility during these intermediate
than the normal strength obtained by standard mono- phases due to the flexibility of the provisory sup-
tonic compression tests. The same authors found that ports and the more limited lateral confinement, so that
such phenomena could start at 40%–50% of the normal significant initial deformations were produced. This
strength value. phenomenon was amplified by the early settlement of
71
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 72
mortar in joints and the initial creep of compressed (Fig. 10). Momentarily, the construction experienced
members. an intermediate stage consisting of the partial struc-
Historical research on Mallorca Cathedral (built tures shown in figure 11 (left). It is not clear, from
during 13th to 15th c.) has proven that the construc- the historical documents, whether the centering of the
tion of each bay followed the same process, consisting lateral vaults was removed prior to the construction of
on, first, the erection of the lateral chapels (with the central vault, or whether it was maintained dur-
their vaulting) and buttresses, and, second, the con- ing the entire operation. Removing the centering of
struction of the collateral and then the central vaults the lateral naves would have caused a very significant
inward thrust on the partial structure (Fig. 10) produc-
ing large lateral deformation. Given the characteristics
of the wooden centering frames used at the time (with
no foreseeable effective transverse ties to prevent from
causing lateral forces against the capitals of the piers,
it is likely that keeping them during the construction
of the central nave would not have saved the piers from
receiving a significant unbalanced lateral thrusts.
The numerical simulation of this stage, carried out
by means of a FEM continuum damage model (see
Cervera, 2003, for more information on the calcula-
tion technique used) has shown that equilibrium is
possible for this particular condition at the cost of a
very important deformation; however, no significant
damage is experienced by the partial structures. The
obtained lateral deformation is one order of magnitude
larger than that predicted by an instantaneous analy-
sis on the entire structure. Consistently, the subsequent
completion of the central clerestory walls and vaults in
Figure 10. Construction process and temporary unbalanced the sequential analysis (Fig. 11, right) does not cause
forces in the transverse section of a Gothic cathedral. significant additional deformation.
Figure 11. Simulation of the construction process. Intermediate (left) and final (right) configuration and accumulated
deformation.
72
chap-06 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 73
73
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XIV
chap-07 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 75
C. Modena
Department of Structural and Transportation Engineering, University of Padua, Italy
75
chap-07 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 76
the above concepts more and more clear and “stabi- one meter to three meters), which 3 cm thick boards
lized”, and then implemented into as much as possible are simply nailed to. Preliminary design hypotheses
generalized and controllable procedures. assumed that only a complete dismounting could have
With this aim some design experiences carried out permitted a “safe” repairing of heavily deteriorated
in Italy are presented and commented. zones of the ribs (Figs. 3 and 4) of such a “delicate
audacious” structure, being conscious however that
this solution could have caused unacceptable losses of
2 LIMITING THE INTERVENTIONS BY the existing material and components and, in general,
USING INVESTIGATIONS AND of its original character.
MONITORING
Figure 2. Internal view of the roof. Figure 4. Deterioration of the internal part of the ribs.
76
chap-07 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 77
A cautious and really conservative approach should In situ measurements of wind pressure (Figs. 5
have permitted to limit the repairing works to the pure and 6) on selected points were in fact compared with
substitution of the deteriorated parts of the timber ribs wind tunnel tests (Fig. 7) on a reduced scale model
avoiding any previous dismantling but also extremely of the building and of significant surrounding part of
expensive and heavy (and dangerous for the remaining the historical center of the town, to determine static
parts of the building) temporary supports. effects.
This obviously implies the possibility of relying, Dynamic characterization via in situ measurements
during the works, on the capability of the structure to of forced vibrations (obtained by a harmonic exciter
offer enough strength and stiffness, with minor “tem- applied to a rib) demonstrated that the fundamental
porary aids”, to resist with acceptable stresses and period of vibration is far from giving dynamic inter-
deformations, to the self weight and, even more crucial, action with wind (Figs. 8 and 9) (Modena et al. 1999).
to the most critical action which could cause severe
damages to such a light structure, i.e. wind.
Major efforts were for such reasons primarily ded-
icated to a clear understanding of both static and
dynamic effects of wind on the roof structure, tak-
ing into account its precise geometry and position
inside the town (for static effects) and for its real
wind/structure interaction (for dynamic effects).
Two different types of investigation were used for
the analysis of static and dynamic effects of wind.
77
chap-07 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 78
removing of the
metal deteriorated
support element
stone masonry
Figure 11. Lateral bracing of the ribs. element
78
chap-07 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 79
Removal of about
temporary tie: 6 cm of mortar joint
Ø 24 mm bar
or steel wire Ø6 mm
sealing
Loading cell or
dinamometer for repointing
the control of the with mortar
tensile force
Figure 18. Bed joint reinforcement technique: scheme and
Figure 15. Scheme of insertion of a temporary tie and detail of the reinforcement in a brick masonry wall by
control of the tensile force. steel bars.
79
chap-07 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 80
Figure 21. Intervention on the bell-tower of the Cathedral of Monza: reinforcing tie-rings at different level and diffusion of
the bed joint reinforcement technique along the main sides of the Tower; scheme of the technique applied on the walls and
detail of the strengthening of the corners.
80
chap-07 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 81
conditions are the Cathedral of Monza and the Civic large cracks were located near the corners and com-
Tower of Vicenza (Italy). plete or partial detachment of the external leaf and of
The bell tower of the Cathedral of Monza (XVI local buckling of the masonry was found also in some
century) was suffering passing-through large verti- areas of the façades (Valluzzi et al. 2003a) (Fig. 23).
cal potentially dangerous cracks on some particularly The interventions (Fig. 23) consisted of: (i) grout
weak portions of the West and East sides (Modena injection at the base of the tower and on the belfry
et al. 2001). They were slowly but continuously open- pillars, (ii) local rebuilding, (iii) pointing of mortar
ing since 1927; moreover, wide cracks in the corners of joints, to restore the areas characterized by high mate-
the tower up top 30 m and a damaged zone at a height rial deterioration; (iv) reinforced repointing applied
of 11 to 25 m with a multitude of very thin and diffused on various portions of the walls and on the pillars, to
vertical cracks were detected (Fig. 20). counteract the creep damage and to strengthen the cor-
Design of intervention was mainly aimed in pro- ners (Fig. 24); (v) metallic horizontal reinforcing rings
viding an overall confining action of masonry walls, and anchoring ties placed at different levels along the
limiting the dilation of the material. They consisted of: height of the tower to confine the masonry and improve
(i) metallic horizontal reinforcing rings applied on sev- the connection between contiguous walls.
eral sections along the height of the Tower, to improve
the connection between the contiguous walls; (ii) the
application of the reinforced repointing technique dif-
fused on various portions of the walls, to counteract the
creep damage, and concentrated on some pilaster strips
to strengthen the corners; (iii) local interventions of
injection, rebuilding, and pointing of the mortar joints,
to restore the zones having high material deterioration
(Fig. 21).
The intervention design was strictly based on the
results of the investigations carried out on site and
in laboratory both on materials and structure (also
static and dynamic tests were useful to calibrate FE
mathematical models). They allow to identify the bed
reinforcement as a technique which, respecting as
much as possible the original structure, provides an
improvement capable to save the preservation concepts
(Fig. 22).
The Civic Tower of Vicenza (XII century) is a slen-
der structure with a base section of 6.2 × 6.5 m and
a height of about 82 m. During centuries, it was sub-
jected to several repairs and changes, due to several
causes (earthquake, bombing, etc.). The Tower suffers
a substantial out-of-plumb, and a damage character-
ized by localized deep cracks, diffused micro-cracks
and material deterioration. Many of the main deep
81
chap-07 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 82
a)
1.20
c=a/g
1.127 b)
1.00
0.880
0.80
0.477
0.60 0.472
0.363
0.40 0.416
0.241
0.20 0.077 0.112 0.166
0.00
82
chap-07 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 83
the typical damages occurring in constructive typolo- On: Seismic Damage to Masonry Buildings, Bernardini
gies (buildings, churches), which led to the consequent Ed., Balkema, Rotterdam.
systematization of the mechanical models able to Binda L., Modena C., Valluzzi M.R. & Zago R. 1999b.
describe their specific behaviour by kinematics mod- Mechanical effects of bed joint steel reinforcement in
historic brick masonry structures, Structural Faults +
els, both for in-plane and out-of-plane mechanisms Repair – 99, 8th International Conference and Exhibition,
(Giuffrè & Carocci 1999, Binda et al. 1999a, Penazzi London, England, 11 pp. on CD-ROM.
et al. 2001). Giuffrè A. 1993. Sicurezza e conservazione dei centri storici.
Those models, calibrated on the real damaged sites, Il caso Ortigia, Laterza, Bari.
are usefully applied for analyses of vulnerability for Giuffrè A. & Carrocci C. 1999. Codice di pratica per la
centres under seismic hazard, in order to examine the sicurezza e la conservazione del centro storico di Palermo,
current condition and to prevent their future damage. Laterza, Bari.
Moreover, the simulation of possible interventions can ISCARSAH-ICOMOS 2001. Recommendations for the
be performed, both in damaged and undamaged con- Analysis, Conservation and Structural Restoration of
Architectural Heritage.
ditions, evaluating their impact with the pre-existing M.B.C.A. 1986. Circ. 1032 18/7/1986: Raccomandazioni
situation (Avorio et al. 2002, Valluzzi et al. 2004). relative agli interventi sul patrimonio monumentale a
tipologia specialistica in zona sismica.
M.B.C.A. 1996. Istruzioni generali per la redazione dei pro-
5 CONCLUSIONS getti di restauro nei beni architettonici di valore storico
artistico in zona sismica.
Some case studies have been presented and com- M.LL.PP. 1996. D.M. 16/1/1996: Norme tecniche per le
mented where efforts have been made to respond costruzioni in zone sismiche.
to “conservative” design criteria while intervening Modena C. & Valluzzi M.R. 2003. Repair techniques for
creep and long term damage of massive structures, Proc. of
to ensure acceptable structural safety conditions of
the VIII STREMAH Conf., Structural Studies, Repairs and
existing historic constructions. Maintenance of Heritage architecture, Haldikiki, Greece,
As it is first of all expected in order to respect 7–9 May 2003, C.A. Brebbia Ed., WitPress, UK, pp.
the existing features of the considered constructions, 141–150.
attention has been focused on avoiding unnecessary Modena C., Valluzzi M.R., Tongini Folli R. & Binda L. 2001.
interventions and special care has been paid in order to Design choices and intervention techniques for repairing
limit in any case as much as possible variations not only and strengthening of the Monza cathedral bell-tower, 9th
of its external appearance, but also of its mechanical Structural Faults & Repair, London, UK, 4–6 July 2001,
behavior. 12 pp., on CD-ROM.
Modena C., Zonta D. & Riolfo A. 1999. Dynamic investiga-
This requires that special efforts are made to accu-
tion on the Palazzo della Ragione roof in Padua, Structural
rately analyze, theoretically and experimentally, the Faults + Repair – 99, 8th International Conference and
actual resisting properties of the considered con- Exhibition, London, England, July, 13–15, 1999, 10 pp.,
structions, prior and after interventions are made, in on CD-ROM.
order to avoid over-designing approaches. Moreover, Penazzi D., Valluzzi M.R., Saisi A., Binda L. & Modena C.
the actual contribution of any traditional/innovative 2001. Repair and strengthening of historic masonry build-
material and technique, and of their possible com- ing in seismic area, International Millennium Congress
binations, can be adequately and scientifically ‘More than two thousand years in the history of archi-
exploited in order to ensure durability, compatibility tecture safeguarding the structure of our architectural
heritage’, Bethlehem (Palestine), Vol. 2, Section V (7 pp.).
and possibly removability of repair/strengthening
Valluzzi M.R., da Porto F. & Modena C. 2003a. Structural
interventions. investigations and strengthening of the civic tower in
Vicenza, Structural Faults & Repair – 2003, Common-
wealth Institute, Kensington, London, UK, 1–3 July 2003,
REFERENCES 10 pp., on CD-ROM.
Valluzzi M.R., Tinazzi D. & Modena C. 2003b. Strength-
Avorio A., Borri A., Corradi M. 2002. Ricerche per la ening of masonry structures under compressive loads
ricostruzione. Iniziative di carattere tecnico e scientifico a by using FRP strips, Proc. 6th International Sympo-
supporto della ricostruzione, Regione dell’Umbria, DEI, sium on Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Reinforcement
Roma. for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-6), 8–10 July 2003,
Binda L., Modena C., Saisi A., Tongini Folli R. & Valluzzi National University of Singapore, Singapore, Vol. II, pp.
M.R. 2001. Bed joints structural repointing of historic 1249–1258.
masonry structures, 9th Canadian Masonry Symposium Valluzzi M.R., Cardani G., Binda L. & Modena C. 2004.
‘Spanning the centuries’, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Analysis of the seismic vulnerability of masonry build-
Canada, 12 pp., on CD-ROM. ings in historical centres and intervention proposals, 6th
Binda L., Gambarotta L., Lagomarsino S. & Modena C. International Symposium on the Conservation of Monu-
1999a. A multilevel approach to the damage assessment ments in the Mediterranean Basin, Lisbon, Portugal, 7–10
and seismic improvement of masonry buildings in Italy. April 2004, pp. 561–565 (on CD-ROM).
83
prelims-vol-1 16/9/2004 18: 40 page XIV
chap-08 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 85
Ö. Kırca
ÇimSA Cement Production and Trading Company, Mersin, Turkey
ABSTRACT: This paper deals with the history of technology related with binding materials. Lime, gypsum,
and hydraulic binders, i.e. lime-pozzolan mixture have been the major types of binding materials survived in
different regions of the world for 8000 years. Whatever type of binding materials the ancient civilizations used,
it can be seen that those structures built by ancient binders, particularly lime-pozzolan mixture have survived
for several hundred years. It can be claimed that even at that time architects were aware of the importance of
the durability of binding materials. However, those structures belonging to modern civilizations and made by
using modern binders, i.e. portland cement have experienced significant deterioration throughout their service
life, generally lesser than 100 years.
In this research, the object of the study is to investigate the historical timeline of binding materials and to
focus on their durability aspects by comparing the traditional technologies with modern ones.
87
chap-08 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 88
technology from Etruscans and Greeks and improved in order to be used in construction it must be mixed
it drastically. with water to form a lime paste, which is defined as
Concrete and/or cement itself is actually a phe- “hydration” or “slaking”.
nomenon of nature, with the first evidence of its To produce dry powdered hydrated lime just suf-
existence in Israel dating back to 12 000 BC, when nat- ficient water is added for the quicklime lumps to
ural deposits of cement compounds were said to have break down to a fine powder. This material would
formed due to reactions between limestone and oil have a “shelf life” of only a number of weeks, depend-
shale, employing spontaneous combustion. However, ing on storage conditions. “Old” hydrated lime would
the earliest known concrete produced intentionally by have partially carbonated and become a less effective
human beings was discovered in the floor of a crude binder. If too little or too much water is added, the prop-
shelter built about 5600 BC on the banks of the river erties of the slaked lime will be spoiled; the slaked lime
Donube in Yugoslavia. The floor was made from mix- will not harden and the paste will not be as plastic as
ture of sand, gravel and red lime. That concrete was it should be (Erdoğan 2002).
manufactured deliberately, rather than unintentionally However, if quicklime is hydrated with a proper
by utilizing the red lime from a site 320 km away. For amount of water and well agitated, it forms a milky
some reason, it appears that the technique for using suspension known as milk of lime, which can be easily
lime-based cements was lost for at least 2500 years, used in building applications.
until indications of use by the ancient Assyrians and Limestone containing a proportion of clay is
Babylonian civilizations around 3000 BC. They used often seen as an advantage in building as they pro-
bitumen to bind stones and bricks. About the same duce hydraulic limes. In fact, limes do not possess
time Egyptians used mud bricks mixed with straw to hydraulicity, since it needs carbon dioxide for its hard-
bind dried bricks and also this phenomenon furthered ening reaction (Erdoğan 2002). However, in the case
the discovery of lime and gypsum mortars as a binding of hydraulic limes, as the name implies, they can set
agent for building the pyramids. Even at that time, the and harden even under water and will produce stronger
ancient Chinese people used cementitious materials to mortars.
hold bamboo together in their boats and in the Great In the construction industry, usually lime, in its
Wall, one of the Wonders of the world. By 500 BC hydrated or putty form, is mixed with aggregate and
the art of making concrete had spread to the Mediter- water to produce concrete or mortar for different
ranean island of Crete, and from there to the ancient purposes such as plastering sand-lime brick produc-
Etruscans and Greeks. tion etc. Plain lime-sand mortars are quite weak;
Yet, it was the Romans who brought the manufacture any early adhesive strength results from drying out
and use of lime-based cement to an art form. 300 BC whereas longer-term hardening occurs as a result of
saw the Romans employing slaked lime and volcanic carbonation of the lime.
ash called pozzolan, named after the town of Pozzuoli, Traditional lime plasters were often mixed with ani-
near Mt Vesuvius. This was a hydraulic cement that mal hair to improve cohesion and adhesion. Today
can set harden when mixed with water in air as well addition of gypsum or portland cement and/or poz-
as under the water. Moreover, some natural additions zolans to increase durability and give faster setting
such as animal fats, milk, and blood were also used times is more common.
throughout this era.
After the fall of the Roman Empire, knowledge of
cement was lost till the 18th century. 3.2 Ancient lime technology
The whole historical timeline of cement and con-
Quarrying: The first step of lime production required
crete is summarised in Table 1, where the develop-
finding a suitable raw material which was generally
ments in modern era are also outlined.
calcium carbonate based stones such as limestone
and marble. Quarrying techniques had become well
advanced during construction of the great Egyptian
3 TECHNOLOGY OF ANCIENT LIME
pyramids and further advanced during the Roman
AND LIME MORTARS
building era. The determination of raw material
involved trial and error, as well as ages of experi-
3.1 Properties of lime
mental attempts. Once workable quarries and materials
There are two forms of lime: quicklime and hydrated were located, workmen acquired skills for identifying
lime. and extracting suitable calcium carbonate raw mate-
Quicklime is produced by heating rock or stone con- rials. Then such materials had to be transported to
taining calcium carbonate (limestone, marble, chalk, sites where they were prepared for calcination. The
shells, etc.) to a temperature of around 900◦ C for sev- major technological factors surrounding acquisition
eral hours in a process known as ‘calcining’. It is an of the raw carbonate material, therefore, involved,
unstable and slightly hazardous product. Therefore, identification of suitable stone, workable extraction,
88
chap-08 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 89
12 000 BC Reactions between limestone and oil shale during spontaneous combustion occurred in Israel to
form a natural deposit of cement compounds.
5600 BC Intentionally production of concrete from sand, gravel, and lime a natural concrete in Yugoslavia.
3000 BC Bitumen to bind bricks and stones was used by Babylonians and Assyrians.
3000 BC Egyptians used mud mixed with straw to bind dried bricks. They also used lime and gypsum
mortars in the pyramids.
3000 BC Chinese used cementitious material to hold bamboo together in their boats and in the Great Wall.
500 BC The art of making concrete had spread to the Mediterranean island of Crete, and from there to the
ancient Etruscans and Greeks.
300 BC–476 AD Used pozzolan cement from Pozzuoli, Italy near Mt. Vesuvius to build several structures. They
used lime as a cementitious material also Animal fat, milk, and blood were used as admixtures.
400–1779 The art of concrete was lost after the fall of the Roman Empire.
1779 Bry Higgins was issued a patent for hydraulic cement (stucco) for exterior plastering use.
1793 John Smeaton found that the calcination of limestone containing clay gave a lime, which
hardened under water (hydraulic lime).
1796 James Parker from England patented a natural hydraulic cement by calcining limestone-containing
clay, called Parker’s cement or Roman cement.
1812–1813 Louis Vicat of France prepared artificial hydraulic lime by calcining synthetic mixtures of
limestone and clay.
1818 Maurice St. Leger was issued patents for hydraulic cement. Natural cement was produced in the USA.
Natural cement is limestone that naturally has the appropriate amounts of clay to make the same
type of concrete as John Smeaton discovered.
1822 James Frost of England prepared artificial hydraulic lime likes Vicat’s and called it British cement.
1824 Joseph Aspdin of England invented portland cement by burning finely ground chalk with finely
divided clay in a lime kiln until carbon dioxide was driven off. The sintered product was then
ground and he called it portland cement named after the high quality building stones quarries
at Portland, England.
1828 I.K. Brunel is credited with the first engineering application of portland cement, which was used
to fill a breach in the Thames Tunnel.
1843 J.M. Mauder, Son & Co. Were licensed to produce patented portland cement
1845 Isaac Johnson claims to have burned the raw materials of portland cement to clinkering temperatures
1849 Pettenkofer & Fuches performed the first accurate chemical analysis of portland cement.
1860 The beginning of the era of portland cements of modern composition.
1862 Blake stone breaker of England introduced the jawbreakers to crush clinker.
1867 Joseph Monier of France reinforced William Wand’s (USA) flowerpots with wire ushering in
the idea of iron reinforcing bars (re-bar).
1886 The first rotary kiln was introduced in England to replace the vertical shaft kilns.
1887 Henri Le Chatelier of France established oxide ratios to prepare the proper amount of lime to
produce portland cement. He proposed that hardening is caused by the formation of crystalline
products of the reaction between cement and water.
1889 The first concrete reinforced bridge is built.
1890 The addition of gypsum when grinding clinker to act as a retardant than the
setting of concrete was introduced in the USA. Vertical shaft kilns were replaced
with rotary kilns and ball mills were used for grinding cement.
1891 George Bartholomew placed the first concrete street in the USA in Bellefontaine, OH. It still exists today.
1893 William Michaelis claimed that hydrated metasilicates form a gelatinous mass (gel) that dehydrates
over time to harden.
1900 Basic cement tests were standardized.
1903 The first concrete high rise was built in Cincinnati, OH.
1909 Thomas Edison was issued a patent for rotary kilns.
(continued)
89
chap-08 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 90
Table 1. (continued)
1930 Air entraining agents were introduced to improve concrete’s resistance to freeze-thaw damage.
1936 The first major concrete dams, Hoover Dam and Grand Coulee Dam were built. They still exist today.
1967 First concrete domed sport structure, the Assembly Hall, was constructed
at the University of Illinois, at Urbana-Champaign.
1970’s Fibre reinforced in concrete was introduced.
1980’s Superplasticizers were introduced as admixtures.
1985 Silica fume was introduced as pozzolanic additive. The highest strength concrete was used in building
the Union Plaza constructed in Seattle, Washington.
quarrying methods, and suitable means of transporta- equal in weight to 1/3 of the quicklime was sprinkled
tion to a site for further treatment (Krumnacher over it. Heat was given off, the material cracked open
2001). and became a powdered, and increased in volume. This
Calcination: In order to convert the calcium carbon- method was considered the best. (2) Immersion: the
ate based raw material into quicklime, it was necessary quicklime, placed in a basket, was lowered into the
to heat the mass of stone or shell up to required temper- water for the proper length of time, and drawn up to
atures. By calcining the raw materials, the water and complete the slaking. The handling was tricky, at best,
carbon dioxide was driven off from within the stone. and demanded considerable skill. (3) Air-slaking: the
Calcining of raw materials took place in either kilns quicklime was simply left exposed, to pick up moisture
or clamps customarily constructed of stone or brick from air (Krumnacher 2001, McKee 1971).
with clamps sometimes representing an open heap of The slaking procedure, like all other steps involving
carbonate material and fuel (Krumnacher 2001). the preparation of mortar had a great influence upon
“When the charge of calcium carbonate undergoes the resultant properties and performance of finished
firing it transforms to a calcium oxide known as quick- mortar.
lime. This transformation involves the release of water Mortar Mixing: In order to create a mortar for unit-
and carbon dioxide, which are driven off after being ing brick or stone, workers introduced slaked lime to
heated through the calcining process. Through trial a sand aggregate. This practice involved proportion-
and error lime burners found that the raw limestone ing the amount of lime, sand and water. According to
fired more completely if broken into pieces about the McKee, in Roman period, three primary methods of
size of two closed fists. If the stones were too large mortar mixing predominated: (1) mixing dry slaked
there would remain unaltered clinkers, which would lime powder, sand, and water; (2) mixing wet slaked-
be found during the subsequent process.These clinkers lime paste and sand, adding water if needed; (3) mixing
would jeopardize the consistency and effectiveness of pulverized dry quicklime, sand and water, using the
a resulting lime. Since quicklime was difficult to store mortar while it was still hot (McKee 1971).
and transport, clamps and kilns were set up near the Fat lime or high calcium lime could be mixed with
site where lime was used and the raw material would the aggregate and allowed to age, provided it was
be transported to the kiln site” (Krumnacher 2001). protected from exposure to the air. Exposure to the
“Constant attention and responsive orchestration of air would act to recarbonate or solidify the mass.
the firing were essential. Lime burners worked unusual Many ancient artisans practiced this custom of storing
hours and were highly skilled, although not always lime putty or lime mortar. Plasterers would keep their
highly respected. In Roman times, inmates and crim- lime in sealed vats for considerable lengths of time.
inals would often be sent to provide labour at the Nicholson describes the mixing and aging of mortar
limekilns” (Krumnacher 2001). as follows (Nicholson 1850): “The mortar should be
Slaking: Quicklime intended for use in construc- made underground, then covered up, and kept for a
tion must first be mixed with water, to form a lime considerable length of time, the longer the better; and
paste, by being slaked (Erdoğan 2002). All calcin- when it is to be used, it should be beat up afresh. This
ing process of calcium carbonate based stones had makes it set sooner, renders it less liable to crack and
to be followed by slaking, which was necessary for harder when dry... How very different was the prac-
construction purposes. tice of the Roman! The lime which they employed
Throughout the Roman period, there were three was perfectly burnt, the sand sharp, clean, and large
different hydration methods for transformation of grained; when these ingredients were mixed in due
quicklime into the hydrated (or slaked) lime by the con- proportions, with a small quantity of water, the mass
trolled addition of water. One of the three methods was was put into a wooden mortar pan, and beaten with
followed: (1) sprinkling or ‘drowning’: ideally, water a heavy wooden or iron pestle, till the composition
90
chap-08 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 91
adhered to the mortar: being thus far prepared, they highly esteemed and respected, the techniques of
kept it until it was at least three years old. The beating preparation and application of lime and lime mortars
of mortar is of the outmost consequence to its durabil- have remained less than fully understood” (Krum-
ity, and it would appear that the effect produced by it, nacher 2001).
is owing to something more than a mere mechanical Vitruvius, a 1st century B.C. Roman architect under
mixture” (Krumnacher 2001, Nicholson 1850). Augustus, conveys the earliest comprehensive details
regarding lime treatment and its use as a building
material. Craft tradition was advanced by the Romans,
3.3 Ancient lime applications who developed a strong infrastructure of labour, raw
material, technological order and transportation. This
In order to understand the techniques associated with
craft tradition and supportive infrastructure facili-
lime mortars it is necessary to review the lineage from
tated a sophisticated building program (Krumnacher
which they arose. While the actual techniques involv-
2001).
ing preparation and application of lime remains less
than fully understood, examples of finished materials
still in existence testify on behalf of the early success
acquired by those working with lime. According to 4 TECHNOLOGY OF ANCIENT HYDRAULIC
Lazell, the picture of the early development of lime BINDER (LIME-POZZOLAN MIXTURE)
technology is as follows (Lazell 1915): “The art of AND ITS MORTAR
using mortar in some from or other is as old as the
art of building or as civilization itself. Evidences of Throughout the history of human beings, for the first
the use of mortar are found not only in the older coun- time, a hydraulic binder was used during the era of
tries of Europe,Asia, andAfrica, but also in the ruins of Roman Empire. This hydraulic binder has been called
Mexico and Peru.The remains of the work of these arti- as Roman cement or concrete, as well. The techniques
sans are evidence to us of the enduring qualities of lime used by architects and artisans for the production of
mortar as well as the skill and knowledge possessed binding materials at the time of the Roman Empire
by the user” (Krumnacher 2001, Lazell 1915). were substantially based upon those described by
Lazell additionally describes ancient era as fol- Vitruvius in his splendid handbook De Architectura
lows (Lazell 1915): “Plastering is one of the earliest (Vitruvius 1960).
instances of man’s power of inductive reasoning, for However, as Vitruvius says, the Roman art of build-
when men built they plastered; at first like the birds ing was the heritage of the Greek culture. On the other
and beavers, with mud; but they soon found out a more hand, the construction technique know-how, includ-
lasting and more comfortable method, and the earli- ing building materials, came from the Egyptians and
est efforts of civilization were directed to plastering. Persians through a slow transmission process of the
The inquiry into it takes us back to the dawn of social original culture (particularly from East Iran) through
life until its origin becomes mythic and prehistoric. the Mesopotamian and the Mediterranean civilization
In that dim, obscure period we cannot penetrate far (Collepardi 1997).
enough to see clearly, but the most distant glimpses In the previous part, the primitive binder, lime, and
we can obtain into it shows us that man had very early its history of technology were examined. However,
attained almost to perfection in compounding material from now on, the technology of the Roman concrete,
for plastering. In fact, so far as we yet know, some of which is very similar to the modern concrete are going
the earliest plastering which remains to us excels, in to be investigated. In fact, the fact that ancient Roman
its scientific composition, that which we use at the concrete has withstood the attack by elements for
present day, telling of ages of experimental attempts. 2000 years, while the modern one undergoes prema-
The pyramids of Egypt contained plaster work exe- ture deterioration within its service life lesser than 100
cuted at least 4000 years ago, and this, where wilful years, shows that the basic construction techniques
violence has not disturbed it, still exist in perfection, of the Romans must be better than those of modern
out vying in durability the very rock it covers, where practice as judged by comparing the products (Moore
this is not protected by its shield of plaster”. 1993).
“Development of masonry construction technol- Mortar consisting of lime and sand has been used
ogy emerged and spread through empirical trial and as an integral part of masonry structures for thousands
error. Within the 1st century B.C. Romans borrowed of years. It also was applied to protect the earthen
and applied Greek and Etruscan techniques of lime walls of ancient houses. When mixed with volcanic
preparation and applications for creating their mor- ash (pozzolan), it becomes a mortar that the Romans
tar. Roman use of lime mortars reflected a keen used to build rock walls. The Romans later discovered
insight into the material and its technological prepara- how to mix this mortar with small stones, bricks, and
tion and application toward their momentous building other materials to produce concrete called as ‘Roman
accomplishment.Although these accomplishments are Concrete’ (Moore 1993).
91
chap-08 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 92
The constituents of Roman Concrete, aggregate and shales possess pozzolanic properties when they are in
pozzolan, are going to be described in the following a finely divided form (Erdoğan 1997).
parts, except the lime, which was discussed previously. In fact, the name pozzolan comes from the town of
Pozzouli in the foothills of Mount Vesuvius, in Italy,
where the ancient Romans had produced a hydraulic
4.1 Aggregates binder by mixing lime with volcanic soil more than
2000 years ago (Erdoğan 1997).
Stone aggregate is a necessary part of the concrete Likewise, Vitruvius describes pozzolan as a kind of
because mortar by itself cannot sufficiently resist the powder, which from natural causes produces astonish-
crushing force of great weights. Aggregate gives con- ing results. He says in his handbook De Architectura
crete its necessary structural body by increasing the that this substance, when mixed with lime and rubble,
density of mass. It also reduces the amount of lime not only gives strength to buildings of other kinds, but
that must be burnt and slaked. The Romans used sev- even when it is used in the sea, they can set and harden
eral kinds of stone for aggregates, ranging in weight under water.
from selce, a very heavy lava stone used in founda- By the day the Romans had mastered the use of
tion walls, to lightweight tufa (a local granular stone) pozzolan, which they added to the dry mix in lieu of
and pumice, both used in vaults. Other kinds of stone, part of the sand. Pozzolan is a friable volcanic mate-
as well as broken bricks and tiles were also used. rial, found in thick beds of chunks and gravel-sized
All of these materials were found in and near Rome. pieces in Latium and Campania and easily reduced
Architectural sculptures and other stone members of to usable form. It often has a distinct reddish or yel-
demolished buildings were sometimes broken up and lowish hue and has the property of forming hydraulic
used as aggregate. In many structures different aggre- silicates in combination with lime, quartz sand, and
gates were used according to the loads to be carried. water. The importance of pozzolan can be exaggerated,
Certain vaults of the Flavian Amphitheatre contain for some large Roman concrete buildings were built
pumice, and the five kinds of aggregate in the walls without it, but mortar made with it set readily under
and dome of the Pantheon were separated into five water, an advantage Roman engineers made good use
horizontal zones, each containing a lighter aggregate of. The architects and builders of the high empire must
than the one below. In foundations the aggregate often have been convinced that pozzolan improved their con-
occupies two thirds of the total volume of the fabric crete, for it was used in almost all buildings and rarely
(Singer et al. 1965). absent from high imperial construction in Rome and
Aggregate was added to the mortar during the actual its environs (Singer et al. 1965).
construction of the wall or vault. Often the stones were
spaced at random, having been dumped into the forms
and left untouched, though sometimes they were raked 6 DURABILITY OF ANCIENT MORTARS
out. In Trajanic and Hadrianic work they were fre- AND CONCRETE: COMPARISON WITH
quently laid by hand in regular rows, spaced evenly in MODERN CONCRETE
the mortar both horizontally and vertically in order to
distribute evenly resistance to load. The stone is such Concrete experts talk today about how to make con-
cases is usually a yellowish tufa, roughly shaped into crete durable. Many ancient concrete and buildings
loaf forms about half-foot in length. Such aggregate are still in use after more than 2000 years. For these
takes up about half the volume of the concrete of walls modern concrete experts, the Romans were fortunate
and vaults. It is always completely surround by mor- builders in that they apparently simply used natural
tar, with the exception of the exposed irregular side pozzolan deposits, which were found to be suitable
of pieces laid against wooden shuttering or formwork for producing a hydraulic mortar. Contrary to this
(Singer et al. 1965). pronouncement, Vitruvius states in his book De Archi-
tectura that the magnificent quality of Roman concrete
resulted from the extensive use of artificial pozzolanic
5 POZZOLAN mortars and concretes. Two artificial pozzolans were
intensively used: (1) calcined kaolinitic clay, in Latin
Natural pozzolans are the naturally occurring siliceous testa; (2) calcined volcanic stones, in Latin carbuncu-
or siliceous and aluminous materials which in them- lus. In addition to artificial reactive ingredients, the
selves possess little or no cementitious value but Romans used a natural reactive volcanic sand named
will, in finely divided form and in the presence of harena fossicia. The ingredients testa, carbunculus
moisture, chemically react with calcium hydroxide at and harena fossicia were intensively used in Roman
ordinary temperatures to form compounds possess- buildings (Vitruvius 1960).
ing cementitious properties. Volcanic glasses, volcanic Dusty ancient history books taught us that Roman
tuffs, trusses, diatomaceous earths and some clays and concrete consisted of just three parts: a pasty, hydrated
92
chap-08 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 93
lime; artificial or natural pozzolan; and a few pieces concrete product called Roller Compacted Concrete
of fist-sized rock. If these parts were mixed together in (RCC) had been crudely developed, U.S. Bureau of
the manner of modern concrete and placed in a struc- Reclamation’s refinements made it an economical can-
ture, the result certainly would not pass the test of the didate for dam construction. In the construction of a
ages (Moore 1993). How did those Romans around dam in Utah, USA, a concrete consisting of a binding
the time of Christ build such elaborate, ageless struc- mixture of 40% Portland cement and 60% fly ash. By
tures in concrete is the question on which the durability coincidence, the fly ash contained the same amorphous
of ancient concrete and its comparison with modern silica compounds as the ash from explosive volcanoes.
one will be discussed in the following part of this And the hydrated portland cement released the cal-
investigation. cium component recognized in the lime part of the
“A most unusual Roman structure depicting their ancient concrete formula. When Reclamation mixed
technical advancement is the Pantheon; a brick faced these two parts for their dam, a bonding gel was formed
building that has withstood the ravages of weathering to tie inert rock pieces of the hatch together. These
in near perfect condition. Solving the riddle of ancient rocks were used as a strong filler material much in the
concrete consisted of two studies: one was understand- same manner as is used in standard concrete practices”
ing the chemistry, and the other was determining the (Moore 1993). So, a close relationship between the
placement of ancient concrete. To understand its chem- calcium hydroxide molecules from Portland cement
ical composition, going back in time much before and that of the ancient wet lime, and between the
Moses is essential. People of the Middle East made amorphous silica of the pozzolanic fly ash and the
walls for their fortifications and homes by pound- amorphous silica of the volcanic pozzolan can be con-
ing moist clay between forms, often called pise work. structed. As a result, such a reasonable relationship
To protect the surfaces of the clay from erosion, the for the concrete components that make the gel for
ancients discovered that a moist coating of thin, white, both modern and ancient concrete can be useful for
burnt limestone would chemically combine with the comparison purposes (Moore 1993).
gases in the air to give a hard protecting shield. Although the similarity of the ingredients of modern
As a guess, the event of discovering pseudo con- and ancient concrete has been explained, there is more.
crete occurred some 200 years before Christ when a Studies of the placement process are very important in
lime coating was applied to a wall made of volcanic, making durable concrete. The Bureau of Reclamation
pozzolanic ash near the town of Pozzuoli in Italy” mixed their components (cement, ash, and rock) with
(Moore 1993). as little water as possible to give a stiff, ‘no slump’
A chemical reaction took place between the vol- concrete; spread it in layers on the dam; and pounded it
canic ash containing silica and small amounts of alu- into place by large vibrating rollers to make a new class
mina and iron oxide and the lime (calcium hydroxide). of concrete. The ancients had mixed their components
Later Romans noticed that mixing finely ground vol- (wet lime and volcanic ash) in a mortar box with very
canic ash with lime made a thicker coat, but it also pro- little water to give a nearly dry composition; carried
duced a durable product that could be set and harden it to the jobsite in baskets placing it over pre-placed
even under water. In order to understand the difference layer of rock pieces; and then proceeded to pound the
between lime and lime-pozzolan mixtures, the chem- mortar into the rock layer. Vitruvius mentioned this
ical reaction have to be examined separately. When process in his history formulas for his concrete, plus
only lime is used as a binding agent within lime-sand- the fact that special tamping tools were used to build a
water mixture, the strength development of the mix cistern wall. Close packing of the molecular structure
occurs as a result of carbonation, whereas in the case of by tamping reduced the need of excess water, which
lime-pozzolan mixture strength development is based is a source of voids and weakness. But also packing
upon the reaction between hydrated lime and finely produces more bonding gel than might be normally
ground amorphous silica. There is no need to carbon expected (Vitruvius 1960, Moore 1993).
dioxide in the case of lime-pozzolan mixture, which Throughout the above paragraphs, the ancient con-
means that it possess hydraulicity. It is also found that crete was compared with one type of modern concrete,
parts of the complex chemistry of the lime-pozzolan RCC, which was invented few years ago and whose
bonding gel matching the same chemical formula of applications are restricted overall the world. The other
modern concrete bonding gel, which is called as C-S-H modern concrete applications generally suffer from
or tobermoritte gel in modern concrete world. And this premature deterioration within their service or design
is so; the pozzolan-wet lime gel gave the high perfor- life. Some of the reasons for that are as follows:
mance to the ancient concrete. The placement technic (1) modern cement is too active, thus the rate of
used in ancient concrete was the other important point hydration reaction, which is exothermic, is too high;
causing high performance (Moore 1993). and thus modern concrete becomes more prone to
“Chemistry alone will not make good concrete; thermal cracking and thus more permeable. (2) Expec-
rather people will make good concrete.Although a new tation of high strength performance from concrete
93
chap-08 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 94
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
94
chap-09 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 95
D. Ekşi Akbulut
Architecture Department, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
F. Aköz
Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
ABSTRACT: In thousands of years in civilization history, these values, which were created by directly human
beings or with nature, are named today as “Cultural and Natural Heritage”. Conservation of these values is a very
important subject that has to be studied. These studies about conservation and restoration of historical buildings
that are very important cultural heritage must be aimed at scientific principles, aesthetics, and conservation of
their historic values.
Before the conservation, restoration and strengthening of a historical building, study stages have to be
define in collecting and evaluating data towards observation and determination studies. In this paper, a sys-
tem approach towards the criteria’s mentioned above that can be easily applied for each historical structure is
proposed.
Since early 20th century, some legal obligations such Even if the history of studies on conservation last
as Carta Del Restauro and Venice Charter are consti- out to past, the modern technique for conservation
tuted for the studies about conservation and restora- begins in 19th century. The congress in Athens in 1931
tion of historical buildings which are very important was the first congress about conservation of historical
cultural heritage. monuments. The congress expresses that each coun-
In the past when the building has its own function try constitute official records which shall contain all
its permanent maintenance has also provided its con- documents relating to its historical monuments and to
servation. According to the famous Italian expert Piero deposit copies of its publications with the International
Gazzolo; “If an architectural monument doesn’t serve Office. After the congress in Athens the principles are
to its own function, conservation becomes more than approved by Italy and called “Carta Del Restauro”
a practical necessity, turns into a cultural responsibil- becomes a legal obligation. And it recommends that
ity. The attention to this subject is depends on the next the specialists from different disciplines have to col-
generations cultural knowledge and the sensitivity to laborate and the experts have to agree that before any
the conservation of cultural heritage”. consolidation or restoration is undertaken. And also
Restoration and conservation methods continu- it is pointed that contributions of all periods of the
ously come into being discussions between the dif- building must not be destroyed, the additions which
ferent disciplines. To cope with this problem, it has misleads the experts must not be built and the original
to determine the method and the conservation level materials that are come up with the analytic researches
in a point of historical and aesthetic appearance of must be conserved.
historical buildings and it has to determine the pro- In 1957 “I. International Conference of Architects
cedures putting into practise relating the structural and Technicians of Historic Monuments” is organized
damages and their repairs. In these studies, spe- in Paris. In this conference it is explained that cultural
cialists from different disciplines like architecture, heritage is common responsibility and some orga-
archaeology, history of art and engineering have to nizations like ICOMOS, ICCROM was proposed to
collaborate. establish.
95
chap-09 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 96
“II. International Conference of Architects and ARTICLE 12. Replacements of missing parts must
Technicians of Historic Monuments” is organized in integrate harmoniously with the whole, but at the
Venice in 1964. The Venice Charter which is consti- same time must be distinguishable from the original so
tuted in the conference is examined the problems of that restoration does not falsify the artistic or historic
architectural conservation in nearly hundred years of evidence.
European history which become more complex and
varied. This charter becomes a solution but not an ARTICLE 13. Additions cannot be allowed except in
ending, on the contrary it is affected the discussions so far as they do not detract from the interesting parts
in international perspective. Also in our days many of the building, its traditional setting, the balance of
associations and organizations are studying about this its composition and its relation with its surroundings.
subject, many national and international conferences,
symposiums are organized. 2.2 Code Ethique (1995)
ICOMOS International Training Committee agreed
on responsibilities, documentations, examinations and
2.1 Venice Charter (1964) applications in the meeting in Suomenlinna, Finland
The Venice Charter has an important role about the- in 1995 which is named as “Code Ethique”. Accord-
oretical progress of methods in conservation of his- ing to the articles about conservation, restoration and
torical buildings and monuments, and foundation of strengthening;
associations. It has 16 articles under the definition, a) As the conservation concept has a large extends
aim, conservation, restoration, historic sites, excava- and the attention of many different social groups
tions, publication headings. In this paper, as a system need to be taken, conservation should be studied
for conservation, restoration and strengthening of a by trained and experienced person, carried out with
historical building approach is proposed, the 9–13 the experts who have to collaborate with different
articles are studied. disciplines with a scientific point of view and work
with mass media associations.
ARTICLE 9. The process of restoration is a highly spe-
b) Before the conservation, restoration and strength-
cialized operation. Its aim is to preserve and reveal
ening applications are constructed; the general
the aesthetic and historic value of the monument and
conditions, the physical properties, damage rea-
is based on respect for original material and authentic
sons and other problems of the historical monu-
documents. It must stop at the point where conjec-
ment should be examined.
ture begins, and in this case moreover any extra work
c) According to these examinations, a basic approach
which is indispensable must be distinct from the archi-
for each application must be improved and a con-
tectural composition and must bear a contemporary
servation method which can be short term or long
stamp. The restoration in any case must be preceded
term must be programmed.
and followed by an archaeological and historical study
d) There should always be a precise documentation of
of the monument.
a technical report of the applications with drawings
ARTICLE 10. Where traditional techniques prove inad- and photographs and should be copied for public
equate, the consolidation of a monument can be institution archives. And also for the public use a
achieved by the use of any modern technique for summary report should be written.
conservation and construction, the efficacy of which e) For the future existence of the monument there
has been shown by scientific data and proved by should be a limited applications with the examina-
experience. tion of each effect through the monument and must
be respected to its cultural heritage, environmental
ARTICLE 11. The valid contributions of all periods to integrity, aesthetic, historical, physical originality.
the building of a monument must be respected, since f) There shouldn’t be any damage or changes to the
unity of style is not the aim of a restoration. When a original monument which are documentation of
building includes the superimposed work of different its history during the conservation, restoration and
periods, the revealing of the underlying state can only strengthening application.
be justified in exceptional circumstances and when g) The modern techniques or new materials shouldn’t
what is removed is of little interest and the material be used without required experiments, scientific
which is brought to light is of great historical, archae- researches and discussions with an expert.
ological or aesthetic value, and its state of preservation h) The conservation, restoration and strengthening
good enough to justify the action. Evaluation of the application shouldn’t mislead the future studies,
importance of the elements involved and the decision if it is necessary, the application can be removed,
as to what may be destroyed cannot rest solely on the renewal as possible as can be and congenial with
individual in charge of the work. its surroundings (Binan, 1999).
96
chap-09 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 97
97
chap-09
9/9/2004
8: 6
page 98
98
99
chap-09 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 100
Table 1. General study program for conservation and restoration of historical buildings.
100
chap-09 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 101
be defined. Before all else architect of the building, materials as stone, brick, mortar to determine their
the institution or the constructer who organized the strengths.
construction and constructed date or period must be
defined from the documents about the historical build-
ing than the information about past restorations, addi- 4.5 Laboratory studies
tions, renewals must be taken and current conditions After preparing the specimens and samples taken from
of the building must be examined. the building, physical and mechanical tests must be
applied. A statistical relation with the results from the
laboratory tests and the non-destructive test must be
4.2 Information of the building
researched to find a correlation. The determination of
After determination of the building identity, litera- the material properties from the elements that no spec-
ture study of the building, plan, section and elevation imens are taken but non-destructive tests are studied
drawings of the building and the photographic of the must be defined by using the statistic correlation.
building must be researched. So as to begin to investi-
gate on the building area the permissions must be get
from related institutions or organizations and contact 4.6 Selection of materials
with the responsible person. At the first stage, there After the tests, determination of original material and
must be visual determination by taking photographs defining the material properties, the selection of mate-
and if there isn’t any architectural drawing of the build- rials for conservation, restoration and strengthening
ing, the measured, detailed drawing of the building studies must be improved. The required tests must be
must be studied on the building area. applied to the selected materials. In the application
period again some specimens must be taken so as to
make tests and investigate the quality, convenience to
4.3 Examine studies on building
the original material.
Before the examine studies the groups must constitute
a study program and define every single job as clear
as possible. 4.7 Conservation, restoration and strengthening
of the building
4.3.1 Coding For the conservation, restoration and strengthening
The structural or any kind of element in the building studies a restoration project must be prepared after
must be coded on the projects and the photographs the required tests and selection of materials. So as
of the building. These elements must be check with to define the application firm auctioning method can
the building so as to define current conditions and the be used after all the studies, projects and documenta-
damages of the building. This study must be done for tions are obtained. There should be a control system
also each decoration element on the building as well for quality and convenience to the original building
as the structural elements. and the projects after the conservation, restoration
and strengthening applications. An educated group of
4.3.2 Determination of damages workers should for the proper, conscious and conve-
The study stages and study schedule must be formed nient to the original project study in the conservation,
from the prepared, coded project. There should restoration and strengthening applications.
be determination of materials and measurement of There should be expert groups, clarified job
dimensions from each element, detailed photography descriptions, detailed and defined study programs for
from required areas, and determination of damages each study stages in the study program defined in 6
and examination of the damage causes and investiga- stages which is mentioned above.
tion of damage improvements by using the visual and
measurement methods.
5 DISCUSSIONS
4.4 Non-destructive tests
Although this study program seems detailed and long
The non-destructive tests such as rebound test, sonic time work for the the conservation, restoration and
test, temperature test, humidity test and flat-jack test strengthening studies that has many criterias it obtains
must be applied to determine the physical and mechan- determined system for application. The unconscious
ical properties of the materials in winter and summer applications causes unreturn damages to the historical
conditions. Than so as to make studies in laboratory, monuments. In this paper, the study program that has
the specimens must be taken from only required and proper stages, defined experts and study descriptions
permitted areas. The aim in taking specimens from and investigate the unconscious application is pro-
a structural element is to investigate the quality of posed. For example; Hırami Ahmet Paşa Masjid which
101
chap-09 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 102
is restored between 1966–1968 the fresks are removed Akman, S., 2000, Yapi Hasarları ve Onarım İlkeleri, (Build-
and exterior facade stone work restored without a ing Damages and The Principles of Restoration) İstanbul,
respect to the original building with an unconscious TMMOB İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası, İstanbul Şubesi
study (Kuban, 2000). Akıncı, F.N., 2000, Geleneksel Sivil Mimarinin Sosyo-
The basic problems of restorations are not giving Kültürel Ve İşlevsellik Baǧlamında Tarihsel Sürekliliǧi
İçin Planlama/Finans Modeli, (A Financial Model for His-
any importance to research studied before applica-
torical Continuity in the Consistency of Social-Culture
tions, lack of material investigations, to remain true and Function of Traditional Residence Architecture)
to original materials and lack of scientific documen- Doktora Tezi, Y.T.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul
tation. In this paper, the suggested study program Aköz, F., 1995 Yüzer, N., “Investigation of Material Proper-
obtains also detailed documentation, recorded knowl- ties of Küçük Ayasofya Mosque – Sts Sergius and Bac-
edge about the buildings. chus – in Istanbul by Using Non Destructive Methods”,
STREMA 95, Structural Studies Repairs and Maintanence
of Historical Buildings, Chania, Crete, Greece
Aköz, F., 1996, Investigation of Material Properties of Küçük
6 CONCLUSIONS Ayasofya Mosque – STS Sergius and Bacchus by Using
Non-Destructive Test Methods, EC Workshop on Non-
As it seen in the study program which is proposed in Destructive Testing to Evaluate Damage Due to Environ-
this paper; mental Effects on Historing Monuments, Trieste, Italy
Aköz, F., 2001, Experimental Methods and Tests on Histor-
– It may be improved by the experts from differ- ical Structures, Workshop 3rd Meeting of IASS-WG17-
ent disciplines according to their needs and study Historical Structures, İstanbul, Türkiye
subjects Binda, L., Tiraboshi, C., 1999, Flat-Jack Test: A slightly
– These programs which improved by the experts may destructive technique for the diagnosis of brick and stone
be gathered by director and transfer to the other masonry structures Aedification Publishers
experts and it may provide different disciplines col- Binan, C., 1999, Mimari Koruma Alanında Venedik
Tüzügü’nden Günümüze Düşünsel Gelişmenin
laborated study and may be viewed by the director
Uluslararası Evrim Süreci, (International Conceptual
of study program Improvement of From Venice Charter to Today) YTÜ
– Such a study program like this, it may be scien- Basım Yayın Merkezi, İstanbul
tific, aesthetic, conservative to the historical values Erder, C., 1975, Tarihi Çevre Bilinci, (Historical Environ-
and a scheduled study by the experts from dif- ment Conscious) ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayın no: 24,
ferent disciplines for conservation, restoration and sf. 84–87, Ankara
strengthening as it is mentioned in Venice Charter İpekoǧlu, B., Böke, H., 2002, Türkiye’de Tarihi Yapılarda
and other documentations of ICOMOS Malzeme Koruma Sorunları, (The Conservation Problems
of Material in Historical Buildings) 1. Ulusal Malzeme
Kongresi ve Sergisi, TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Büyükkent
Şubesi, İstanbul
REFERENCES Kuban, D., 2000, Tarihi Çevre Korumanın Mimarlık Boyutu,
(Architectural Perspective of Conservation of Historical
Ahunbay, Z., 1999, Tarihi Çevre Koruma ve Restorasyon, Environment) Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları, İstanbul
(Conservation and Restoration of Historical Environment) Tunçoku, S., 2004, Günümüzde Koruma/Restorasyon
İstanbul, Yem Yayın Çıkmazı, (Contemporary Conservation/Restoration Prob-
Ahunbay, Z., 2002, ICOMOS ve Risk Altındaki Kültürel lems) Mimarlık Dergisi, Sayı 315, Sayfa: 56, İstanbul
Mirasın Korunması, (ICOMOS and Conservation of His- Anon 3, T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı, Kültür ve Tabiat Varlıklarını
torical Heritage Under Risk) İstanbul Yapı Dergisi Sayı: Koruma Genel Müdürlüğü, yayın no: 1806, 2. Basım,
244, Sf: 27–29 Mart, 1996/Ankara
102
chap-10 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 103
D. Friedman
Consulting Engineer, New York, USA
ABSTRACT: Conservation of historic high-rise buildings requires analysis of the peculiarities of early modern
construction. The beams, columns, and facades of large steel-frame, masonry-wall buildings experience complex
undesigned interactions. Masonry curtain walls of these buildings are usually 300 mm thick, capable of resisting
structural loads. American investigation of interactions between masonry curtain walls and steel frames began
with facade inspection laws intended to find damaged masonry on high-rise buildings. Structural effects found
include cracking, out-of-plane displacement, and spalls resulting from thermal stress, sidesway, and rust-jacking.
This paper compares the effect on masonry curtain walls of various structural mechanisms, specifically for high-
rise buildings as constructed in the United States between 1900 and 1930. For each mechanism, the stress and
strain interaction of steel and masonry elements is considered, rather than analyzing them separately as in modern
design practice.
103
chap-10 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 104
lack of expansion joints (a structural problem). Struc- This latter class of building is highly concentrated in
tural problems such as excessive sidesway are typically New York and Chicago, as no other city had a large
not visible in themselves, but become manifest in number of tall steel-frame buildings constructed in that
damage to non-structural elements. era, and construction details from the post-World War
II period are significantly different.
The character of large portions of Manhattan is
2 HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL marked by early twentieth century steel-frame build-
CONTEXT ings: the downtown and midtown business districts
contain hundreds of office buildings of this type, while
The earliest steel-framed buildings in the United the north-south avenues of the uptown residential
States, completed before building codes recognized neighborhoods are lined with miles of mid- and
the reality of curtain-wall construction, had very thick high-rise apartment houses. Some of these build-
exterior walls, with 600 mm of masonry common in ings, such as the 240 m Woolworth Building of 1913,
the 1890s. A trend towards 400 mm walls shortly were planned as architectural monuments and have
before 1900 was finalized by the 1901 New York remained so since, but most of these buildings were
City Building Code, which required minimum 300 mm meant as ordinary “background” architecture (Fig. 1).
walls on all steel-frame buildings. Walls continued to Individual buildings have been designated as protected
be built thicker than minimum in order to carry archi- landmarks by the NewYork City Landmarks Preserva-
tectural ornament. Various facing materials were used, tion Commission. There are also designated landmark
most often brick and glazed terra cotta. districts containing many of these buildings, but the
Steel-frame buildings constructed before the 1901 significant buildings within the districts (such as the
code vary greatly in structural type, and can be Upper East Side district) are often low-rise, traditional-
considered as partly experimental. Those constructed construction buildings such as churches and private
after 1901 and before the 1929 economic crash are residences. Despite the fact that so many steel-frame
much more structurally uniform, as described below. mid- and high-rise buildings in Manhattan are not
considered architecturally distinguished, this type of
building is of great interest because it quantitatively
dominates use and repair.
3 BUILDING DESCRIPTION
104
chap-10 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 105
years of the twentieth century), the only lateral load Code cleared the way for walls of constant 300 mm
explicitly used in the design of multi-story apartment, thickness by explicitly recognizing the frame struc-
office, and industrial buildings was wind load; under tural support of the walls, in place of the codes based
current codes in the United States, wind load usu- on masonry structure previously in use. The detail used
ally governs for steel-frame buildings except in the for supporting the back-up masonry nearly always con-
high-seismic areas (primarily the west coast) where sisted of the masonry resting at each floor on either
relatively little high-rise construction took place until the spandrel beams or the slab above the spandrel
after 1945. Connections were typically riveted except beams. The veneer was commonly supported through
for beam-to-girder double-angle connections, which mechanical interlock with the back-up (e.g., headers).
were either riveted or bolted. Windows were simple rectangular openings with either
The most common lateral-load systems were loose lintels or, rarely, hung lintels. Masonry piers built
moment frames with semi-rigid bracket connections, integrally with the walls were typically used to provide
often top and bottom stiffened angles. Knee braces fire-protection to the spandrel columns.
or more complex moment frames were used on slen- The most important structural aspect of these build-
der or unusually tall buildings; full-bay bracing was ings is not obvious during cursory examination. Unlike
used only in the tallest and most slender buildings. modern construction, where great efforts are made to
The reliance on moment frames is in part an artifact structurally isolate facades through the use of expan-
of design methods: the use of portal- and cantilever- sion joints and flexible ties, the exterior of these
frame analyses did not provide accurate lateral drift buildings is a system of masonry and metal elements
results that might have encouraged the use of stiffer in continuous contact. More specifically, there are
frames. Matrix-based analysis was impractical with- no expansion joints of any kind in the curtain walls
out computers and moment-distribution was not yet and the fire-proofing piers tie the columns to the
available (Cross, 1930). walls. The presence of these piers and the close con-
Several floor systems were in use simultaneously tact between masonry, spandrel beams, and floor-slab
during the period of interest. In 1900, terra-cotta tile edges makes independent movement of the walls and
arches were the standard method of providing a floor frame impossible, and therefore negates a common
between beams. By 1930, the most common system design assumption.
was the draped-mesh slab, often constructed using
cinder-aggregate concrete. Ordinary bar-reinforced
3.2 Case study: 953 Fifth Avenue
concrete slabs were sometimes used, although they
were rare in New York during the 1920s and 30s. The apartment house constructed in 1924 at 953 Fifth
Patented reinforced-concrete slabs, such as the Kahn Avenue in Manhattan is typical structurally except for
System, were most common in the 1910s, but appear its bar-reinforced concrete slabs. At fourteen stories
throughout the period. (46 m) above grade, it was not particularly tall when
Building facades were solid masonry, consisting built, however it was built on a single 7.6-meter-wide
of a veneer of ashlar, terra cotta, or face brick over lot and it therefore has a fairly high slenderness ratio
common-brick back-up. The 1901 New York Building of 6 (Fig. 2). In reality it receives no wind load in the
Figure 2. Typical floor framing plan, 953 Fifth Avenue. 1 is a spandrel column in a masonry pier, 2 is the typical floor slab,
and 3 is a typical spandrel beam embedded in the wall.
105
chap-10 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 106
Movement
Cause Location Structure (mm)
106
chap-10 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 107
temperature of 11◦ C, creating equally large thermal than the original wind-load design. The presence of
stresses at the minimum and maximum outside tem- intermediate masonry piers at each intermediate col-
peratures; for the sake of simplicity, the effects will be umn is of no additional help, since those piers cannot
discussed for expansion only although equal effects resist the lateral load by themselves but will simply
exist for contraction. transfer it to the same columns. Resistance to the load
The masonry of the facade is directly exposed to through friction with the floor structure is resistance
both the overall ambient temperature changes and through horizontal shear in the walls; analysis of the
(depending on orientation) direct heat gain from the long north wall shows a required friction/shear stress
sun. Buildings of this type have no dedicated insula- of 130 kPa on each of the two 200 mm by 30,500 mm
tion, but rather rely on the insulating properties of the contact surfaces per floor, which is realistic under the
masonry and the interior plaster. Since the columns conditions described. However, on the short west wall,
are encased in masonry piers of equal exterior and the required friction is 510 kPa, which is greater than
interior thickness and the spandrel beams are encased the allowable shear strength for most clay masonry,
on the exterior with masonry and on the interior with and implies a large compressive force (which may not
concrete fire-protection, the steel temperature is likely be present) in order to develop the friction.
to be roughly half-way between that of the interior Failure of all of the resistance mechanisms results in
and exterior air. This tends to reduce the effects of outward movement of the ends of a wall, cracking the
extreme temperatures but this ameliorative effect is corner masonry on the intersecting walls in line with
not considered here. the inside face of the wall in question. At an ordinary
A wall plane exposed to a large temperature change exterior corner, both walls are moving from roughly
will undergo both vertical and horizontal movement. the same temperature change, and cracks develop on
The effect of vertical thermal expansion is limited both faces.
by the geometry of the connection between wall and
frame: since most of the wall is back-up masonry
that is vertically bounded by spandrel beams, and 5 EFFECTS OF DIFFERENTIAL STIFFNESS
the veneer is regularly tied to the wall by header
bricks, any vertical expansion of the wall will be Differences in stiffness between adjacent building
resisted by the spandrel beams and the forces trans- elements is one of the most potentially damaging
mitted to the columns. Vertical motion is ultimately effects that can be found. Modern construction con-
not damaging because, pushing upwards from the tains numerous provisions for movement to prevent
foundation, it can simply lift the unrestrained upper accidental load transfer to relatively stiff elements,
portions of the facade and adjacent steel upwards. including slip joints in curtain-wall mullions, expan-
At worst, this creates differential movement between sion joints in masonry curtain walls, and movement
spandrel and interior columns, but this is resisted by joints in interior partitions. Buildings of the stud-
the ductile-metal frame. ied type contain continuous masonry curtain walls in
Horizontal thermal expansion is potentially more direct contact with the structural frames and interior
serious, because it is not resisted by gravity but it is terra-cotta- or gypsum-block partitions solidly built
restrained by structure. Unlike the foundations, which between floor slabs. The relative fragility of the parti-
cannot be moved downward by thermal pressure, or the tions makes them less likely to carry structural load,
roof, which can be moved upwards relatively freely, the so the focus here is on the exterior walls.
columns and walls that restrain horizontal movement Similar to thermal effects, the effects of differential
have limited capacities for this undesigned load. There stiffness can be examined for vertical and horizon-
are various mechanisms that in theory restrain the hor- tal movement. As thermal effects are limited to the
izontal thermal expansion: (1) shear at the intersecting wall plane because the amount of change in wall thick-
wall at each plan corner, (2) friction between the wall ness from temperature variation is negligible, stiffness
and the floor structure along the wall length, and effects are effectively confined to the wall plane by the
(3) resistance provided by the wall columns in bend- magnitude of the element stiffnesses. Masonry walls,
ing from load transmitted through the fire-proofing subjected to out-of-plane forces are far more flexible
piers. The second and third mechanisms depend on than the structural frame to which they are attached
the geometry of construction, since the force transfer and therefore act, properly, as non-structural elements.
from masonry to steel can only take place where the Walls subjected to in-plane loading have stiffnesses of
materials are in direct contact. The practice of building the same order of magnitude as the frames – often
the spandrel beams and columns into the wall provides greater than the frames – and therefore have a ten-
such contact. dency to carry load. The simplest example is vertical
Resistance by the columns in bending cannot take movement under floor loading. As shown in Table 1,
place since the distributed load that is created along the the shortening of the frame columns under dead load is
columns (up to 200 kN/m) creates moments far larger greater than the shortening that the adjacent masonry
107
chap-10 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 108
108
chap-10 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 109
109
chap-10 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 110
made protecting complex steel shapes from water rel- factor, vertical expansion joints may be cut into large
atively simple as long as there is enough of a void flat wall planes as well as at corners, while if sidesway
between the steel and masonry at complex corners is actually the dominant factor, the corner joints are all
(such as the intersection of spandrel beams and corner that is required.
columns) to allow for some movement of the sheets. The analysis and repairs techniques that have been
Steel repairs may be performed with masonry developed in New York (and similar techniques in
repairs, ranging from reinforcing plates welded to Chicago, since the 1996 enactment of a façade inves-
flanges and webs that have lost material to rust up to tigation law) are mostly empirical. The advantage to
complete replacement of columns and beams. Repair this approach is that only those techniques that pro-
is favored over replacement as it is far less disruptive duce acceptable results become commonly used. The
to the occupied interiors and more safely performed disadvantage is that a lack of explicit understanding of
from scaffolding over occupied sidewalks. a given problem leads to an iterative repair approach,
which is wasteful of time and money. Analysis of
facades as composite steel-and-masonry structures, as
8 CONCLUSIONS suggested here, is one method towards better focused
repairs.
Regardless of the causes, damage to masonry cur-
tain walls on high-rise buildings must be repaired to
maintain public safety. However, different causes of
damage may require different repair details. At this REFERENCES
time, despite the large and growing body of experi-
Condit, C. & Landau, S.B. 1996. Rise of the New York
ence in New York among designers and contractors
Skyscraper, 1865–1913. New Haven: Yale University
with repairs, analysis is rarely performed to discover Press.
the causes of observed damage. The mechanism of Cross, H. 1930. Analysis of rigid frames by the distribution of
rust-jacking is well understood, and the initial cracks fixed end moments. Proceedings of the American Society
are typically described as “thermal movement.” Two of Civil Engineers 56: 919–928.
aspects of thermal expansion are not obvious: first, that Elliott, C. 1992. Technics and Architecture. Cambridge,
the force developed in restrained thermal expansion is Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press.
independent of the length of the element; and second, Gibbs, P. 2000. Technical Advice Note 20: Corrosion in
that simple friction with the floor structure is, for long Masonry Clad Early 20th Century Steel Framed Buildings.
Edinburgh: Historic Scotland.
walls, more of a restraint on thermal expansion than
1980 Local law 10/80 in The City Record 108(32169).
that provided by intersecting walls and columns. The Meadows, R. et al. 1986. Historic Building Facades: A Man-
result for this type of construction, counter-intuitive ual for Inspection and Rehabilitation. New York: New
for non-engineers, is that the longer a wall is, the York Landmarks Conservancy.
less force it exerts from thermal change at corner 1931 Regional Survey of New York, vol. VI: Buildings: Their
intersections with other walls. Uses and the Spaces About Them. reprinted 1974, New
Lateral load is rarely considered in damage surveys York: Arno Press.
of these buildings, since the steel frames are typically Stockbridge, J.G. 1981. The interaction between exterior
adequate for all lateral loads and current design prac- walls and building frames in historic tall buildings. In
Lynn Beedle (ed.), Developments in Tall Buildings, 1983.
tice does not typically treat steel and masonry as a
Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: Hutchinson Ross Publishing
composite structure. Analyzing this effect can give an Company.
upper bound on stresses in the masonry and, more White, N. & Willensky, E. 2000. AIA Guide to New York, 4th
importantly, can provide insight into patterns of facade edition. New York: Three Rivers Press.
damage, and therefore into repairs required. For exam- Willis, C. 1995. Form Follows Finance. New York: Princeton
ple, if thermal expansion is believed to be an important Architectural Press.
110
chap-11 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 111
D. Wendland
Institute of History of Architecture, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
ABSTRACT: The ribs or groins of vaults are usually carefully designed in their geometry, and their geometrical
layout is normally well analyzed. Less attention is usually given to the shape of the caps in between, as its
understanding is not crucial for the interpretation of the architecture. The information available about the shape
of the caps, either from historical building manuals as from secondary literature, in many cases appears not to
be corresponding to the reality as it can be observed in historical vaults, or not describing it sufficiently.
This study is an attempt to describe their shape in regard to their construction process. A better understanding
of the shape of these caps can be useful for their numerical modelling, as its shape has influence on the structural
behaviour of a vault. Beyond that, such knowledge may be applied in the restoration, repairing or rebuilding of
traditional or historical vaults.
111
chap-11 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 112
Figure 3. Model of intersecting cylinders, showing the Figure 4. Model of a vault built on the same plan as the
spatial intersection curve. preceding one; as usual, the groins are not resulting from
the intersection of cylinders, but describe curves on vertical
planes.
2 THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE GEOMETRIC
DESIGN OF THE RIBS AND GROINS FOR
THE CAP GEOMETRY
112
chap-11 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 113
113
chap-11 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 114
114
chap-11 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 115
Figure 14. The bed joint planes as they appear from the
measurement of the prototype at the TU Dresden: throughout
the main part of the cap, the bed joint planes are parallel. In
the drawing, the full circles of the course curvatures are also
visualized.
115
chap-11 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 116
Figure 16. The shadow reveals the continuity between the Figure 17. The cap masonry during construction; the
course curve and the opposite cap surface (prototype). shifting of the courses outwards is visible (prototype).
116
chap-11 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 117
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
117
chap-11 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 118
takes in account both the fact that the bed joint planes
are parallel and the fact that over the central part of
the cap the radii of the curves described by the courses
are more or less constant. Therefore, we may assume
that the parallel translation of a constant curve sliding
first on the curves of the groin and the formeret or
transversal arch and then on a curve that running nor-
mal to the bed joints expresses the continuity of the
Figure 21. Surface generated by the parallel translation of a slope, will lead to an accurate surface model, perhaps
plane circular curve on an elliptical track. Right: intersection except for the highest portion of the cap. The generator
curve with a vertical plane; the portion that corresponds to
the ridge line of a vault is indicated, limited by the position
curve can be assumed as being plane and circular, the
of the formeret (l.) and the center of the vault (r.). inclination in space constantly normal to the central
portion of the groin curve (this could be relevant in
the cases of high pointed or surbased cross vaults) or
gently curved in the main part of the cap, could be simply by 45◦ .
used for the procedure of surface modelling. The “theoretical” translation surface shown in
In some cases a torus may be considered a fair Figure 21 could also explain the typical profile of
approximation for every half cap, although this would the ridge line which, as mentioned, can be seen in
be accurate only in case that the bed joint planes were many existing vaults (Fig. 22). In fact, the curve gen-
radial, which normally is not the case. erated by the intersection of this surface with a vertical
In the case of the prototype, a translation surface plane (analogous to an intersection with the symmetric
generated by the curves representing the courses slid- counterpart of the opposite half cap) is quite similar
ing on the curve of the slope normal to the bed joints, in its shape to these ridge profiles: the curvature is
proved to be rather accurate in the “critical” part of stronger in the portion just above the summit of the
the cap surface (Fig. 20). In any case, the assumption formeret arch and decreases in the central part towards
of a translation surface is rather close to reality as it the keystone of the groins.
118
chap-11 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 119
Figure 24. The vault shown in Figure 22 (a stellar vault with Figure 26. The intrados of the finished vault prototype.
radial caps), reproduced in a model. In the head joints, the
straight slope of the central part of the cap is visible. and his spatial imagination), and also the demand of
perfection and pleasant appearance of the building in
question.
4 CONCLUSION Therefore, the way which the author has chosen to
approach the problem is that based on a close view at
In the considerations noted above, the terminology that the construction process, to formulate principles which
has been employed is near to that of current CAD tools, must be adapted from case to case. The basic approach,
as the problem discussed is essentially practical. starting from an elementary geometric design of the
However, the formulation of an unequivocal answer arches and ribs, is definitely according to the usual
of how to model the surfaces of a vault has been design process, which may be considered as a pre-
avoided. This is because, to the author’s conviction, condition for its accuracy. The modelling of the caps
the solution to be adopted in a particular case cannot according to the basic principles of the construction
be generalized, first, as it depends on the tools to be process, as they have been pointed out, will lead to an
used for modelling, the quality of the available infor- accurate result.
mation (the survey data) and the degree of accuracy
needed (a high accuracy often implies a high com-
plexity). Neither can the particular case be generalized NOTE
beyond a certain point:Apart from the boundary condi-
tions of a vault, like the layout and geometrical design The present study is part of the author’s doctor
of its arches and groins, which may present a great thesis in preparation, which is supervised by Prof.
variety, the influence of the mason on the final shape D. Kimpel, University of Stuttgart. Part of the research
of the cap is strong – it regards his choices, like that on traditional vault construction has been performed
of the radii of curvature in the courses and the man- with the Fraunhofer-IPK Berlin within the EU project
ner of closing the highest part of the cap, his strategy “iso-brick” (EU CRAFT Research Project G5ST-CT-
of correcting defective tendencies in the shape, and 2001-50095). The models have been built by María
certainly his ability (including his manual dexterity José Ventas Sierra and the author. The practical
119
chap-11 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 120
experimentation has taken place at the Chair of Struc- Jäger, W. 1998. Gutachten Dorfkirche Boitin (unpublished).
tural Design (Prof. W. Jäger),TU Dresden, under direc- Körner, C. 1901. Gewölbte Decken: Gewölbe. 2nd edition.
tion of the author.An acknowledgement is due to María Stuttgart: Bergsträsser.
José who gave strong support to the development of Müller, W. 1990. Naturwerkstein in der Denkmalpflege: Die
figurierten Rippengewölbe der deutschen Spätgotik. In
the contents and the text. Geschichte des Konstruierens IV – Wölbkonstruktionen
Photo credits: all photographs and CAD drawings der Gotik 1, proc. intern. colloquium Stuttgart 1989.
are by M. J. Ventas Sierra and D. Wendland Stuttgart, Tübingen: SFB 230; 123–141.
Nussbaum, N. & Lepsky, S. 1999. Das gotische Gewölbe:
Eine Geschichte seiner Form und Konstruktion.
REFERENCES Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Porter, A.K. 1911. The construction of Lombard and Gothic
Barthel, R. 1991. Tragverhalten gemauerter Kreuzgewölbe. vaults. New Haven etc.: Yale Univ. Press etc.
Karlsruhe: TH Karlsruhe, Inst. f. Tragkonstruktionen. Rave, W. 1955. Das Domikalgewölbe. Deutsche Kunst und
Breymann, G.A. & Warth, O. 1903. Allgemeine Baukonstruk- Denkmalpflege.
tionslehre, mit besonderer Beziehung auf das Hochbau- Ungewitter, G.G. 1859–1864. Lehrbuch der gothischen Con-
wesen. Vol. I: Die Konstruktionen in Stein. 7th improved structionen. Leipzig: Weigel.
and enlarged edition by Otto Warth. Leipzig: Gebhart. Wendland, D. 2002. Model-based formfinding processes:
Gilly, D. 1805. Handbuch der Land-Bau-Kunst: vorzüglich ‘Free forms’ in structural and architectural design. In:
in Rücksicht auf die Construction der Wohn- und F. Levi, M. Chiorino, C. Bertolini (edd.) Eduardo Tor-
Wirthschafts-Gebäude. 3rd ed., Berlin (first edition in roja – From the philosophy of structure to the art and
1795). science of building (proc. Seminar, Turin 2002), Milano:
Lassaulx, J.C. 1829. Beschreibung des Verfahrens bei Franco Angeli 2003, S. 104–19.
Anfertigung leichter Gewölbe über Kirchen und ähnlichen Wendland, D. 2003. A case of Recovery of a Medieval Vault-
Räumen. Journal für die Baukunst, 1.4: 317–330. ing Technique in the 19th Century: Lassaulx’s Vaults in
Lassaulx, J.C. 1846. Über Gewölbeformen: Vortrag des the Church of Treis. In First International Congress on
Bauinspectors von Lassaulx zu Coblenz in der Construction History, Madrid 2003. 2107–17.
Allgemeinen Architecten- und Ingenieur-Versammlung Wendland, D. 2004. Zur traditionellen Technik des
zu Gotha. Zeitschrift für praktische Baukunst, 6/1846, freihändigen Gewölbebaus. In: Das Mauerwerk, 4.2004.
423–427; also Allgemeine Bauzeitung, 376–380.
Hörnig, G.S. 1836. Theoretisch-praktisches Handbuch der
verschiedenen Maurer-Arbeiten bei dem Land- und
Wasserbau. Dresden, Leipzig.
120
chap-12 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 121
An inquiry into an unbuilt monument: the mausoleum for the kings of the
Italy of Alessandro Antonelli
G. Pistone
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale – Politecnico di Torino – Italy
L. Re
Dipartimento di Casa-Città – Politecnico di Torino – Italy
ABSTRACT: The study presented herein addresses an unusual theme: would it be possible to design a building
of gigantic proportions, conceived by a great architect-engineer of the 19th century – Alessandro Antonelli –
in keeping with the views and the specific techniques adopted by the author. The building in question is the
temple-mausoleum for the Kings of Italy, imagined by Alessandro Antonelli, of which all we have is a few tables
with sketches. In this paper, the significant signs taken into account for purposes of formal simplification are
illustrated, and the hypothetical results are correlated to the respective stylistic references of Antonelli’s life-
size projects. Based on the foregoing, the concept of “consistency model” is formulated, to serve as a possible
“validation” tool for architectural/historical virtual models. The first part is followed by a study of the structural
check performed on the reconstruction hypothesis of the mausoleum for the King of Italy.
1 THE CULTURAL GENESIS OF THE PLAN height, could be the introduction to the second; but at
the same time it cannot be excluded that it refers to
“It was in fact in these last years (after 1880, —) another topic”.
that he went ahead with his unyielding intelligence (Franco Rosso, Alessandro Antonelli 1798–1888,
touching on and carrying out new and bold ideals; Milan 1989, page 121), (Rosso, F. 1989).
but there were two projects in particular that he dedi- Even though the critical classification of these
cated his thoughts to, one was the façade of the Milan designs can go no further (as the chronological dis-
Cathedral and the other the mausoleum-temple dedi- cordance between the national competition on the
cated to the Kings of Italy, which was to be erected theme and the testimony of Caselli make the obser-
in Rome either on Monte Mario or on Monte Cavi vation by Rosso legitimate – op cit., page 232-, this
on the site of the ancient temple dedicated to Giove being supported by the date of 1887–1888 affixed by
Laziale. But death, which he encountered while still Costanzo Antonelli on the only table to be completed,
standing in the breach, in spite of his being ninety which deals not of the monument dedicated to Vittorio
years old, also interrupted the thread of thought of Emanuele II, but “if anything, perhaps, of a project that
these two projects, even though of the latter and most wanted to be a piece of criticism”), these records of
grandiose there still remains the plans and the sketched an “interrupted architecture”, in which Antonelli pro-
altimetry which he had outlined and completed” (Cres- ceeds in his faith in the rationalistic assumptions of art
centino Caselli,AlessandroAntonelli,Architect – born in unusual opposition to the trends of that time, seem
Ghemme 14 July 1798, died 18 October 1888, in “The to stimulate some hypotheses on those developments,
Civil Engineer and Industrial Art”, 1888, page 160 that do not occur.
sgg.), (Caselli, C. 1884), (Caselli, C. 1889). This was surely due to the advanced age of the
“There are basically two hypothesis that can be pro- architect, but perhaps also to the set of circumstances
posed for the six drawings that remain (one of which that we know nothing about, that led to the work
had already been put in fair copy): one in the form of being uncompleted. On the other hand, it is not pos-
a Greek cross with wings extended to various degrees, sible to identify the topic of the mausoleum-temple
covered by a gigantic circular dome with a very ogival dedicated to the Kings of Italy in the programme of
arch (….); the other is a circular plan with deep radial the monument dedicated to Vittorio Emanuele II and
apsidal chapels. The first proposal, also developed in the Unity of Italy, already achieved in 1885 at the
121
chap-12 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 122
122
chap-12 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 123
123
chap-12 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 124
Its compact syntactic articulation leaves no room for addresses the problem of the stability of the building,
the redundancy or arbitrariness of the definition of and, in particular, it tries to determine whether static
its elements, of the most minute components; and it equilibrium could have been ensured with the knowl-
is based on the rigorous connection to the principles edge and techniques available at the time. To this end,
of classical composition and neoclassical rationalism: a series of FEM numerical models have been devel-
for example, in the indisputable Albertian identity oped to reproduce the material and structures of the
between external order and internal order or in the mausoleum identified during the first part of the inves-
classical predominance of axial moduli (an arrange- tigation. The purpose of the models was to explore the
ment that Benedetto Alfieri had adopted on the Geneva numerous problems that would have had to be solved
Cathedral façade and which Crescentino Caselli had to create a structure so much bigger than any masonry
adopted for functional reasons in the Charity Hospice building ever completed till then.
building in Turin). All the stylistic-syntactic questions The computation code used applies to compression-
would have found the principles to be developed with and tension-resistant materials in the linear elastic
exemplary elaborations of the language of the orders, field. This choice might appear unsophisticated, but in
already experimented by Antonelli in many religious actual fact it was motivated by the consideration that
and civil buildings. The mausoleum-temple, contem- the aim of a stability study is to identify the orders of
porary of the Eiffel Tower, would have really sealed magnitude of the parameters governing the behaviour
the season of Architecture of the Sublime and Reason, of a construction and the efficacy of the spatial organ-
and would have reconnected – through the concepts isation of the resisting skeleton; accordingly, the pur-
of Boullée and the Enlightenment architects – with pose of the computation code is not to permit refined
the Sainte-Genevieve by Soufflot and with the large checks on the materials and the structure, but rather
domes that had progressively preceded them, as can to serve as a quick tool to pin down the shortcomings
be demonstrated by the continuing topicality of tradi- and weaknesses and to identify the changes necessary
tional construction in bricks and stones in the face of to overcome the problems detected by the analysis.
new technologies, in the intent of “attributing light to In keeping with the results of earlier tests performed
the progress in lateritious and stone construction for at our laboratory on materials from the Antonelli
the large coverings”, in that “it is the most consen- school, a Young’s modulus of 2,000 MPa was assumed
sual for our Italian customs, the most convenient for for the masonry, with density of 18 KN/m3 ; the values
our interests and duties, to preferably use the materials assumed for granite were 55,000 MPa and 28 KN/m3
that nature has been lavish with” (as Antonelli himself respectively, and for iron they were 210,000 MPa
wrote on other occasions). and 80 KN/m3 , (Mattone, R., Pasero, G., Pavano, M.,
The second legitimate curiosity was obviously to Pistone, G., Roccati, R., 1982), (Pistone, G.,
verify the feasibility of the project, from what could be Roccati, R., 1988), (Pistone, G., Roccati, R., 1991).
deduced from the sketch. Obviously it is not possible
to imagine which elaborations Antonelli would have
made to the original idea (as he continued to do with 2.1 Modelling the structure
open sites for the Dome and the Mole: it is possible
For the sake of convenience, the model was subdivided
to observe, but never in a restrictive manner) confid-
into two parts, corresponding to a hypothetical subdi-
ing almost exclusively in the intuition and experience
vision of the building: the dome, including the drum
of the architect (as it was for the Dome and the Mole)
and the lantern, and the base.
and which devices he would have gradually introduced
to resolve the criticalities that have appeared from a
2.1.1 The dome, the drum and the lantern
verification method, which with respects to those of
The dome consists of two concentric ogive-shaped
Antonelli’s time, has greatly reduced the difference
skins, 1.30 m thick and ca 70.0 m high. The 38.0 m
between phenomena and hypotheses (and where it is
high drum consists of three orders with binate
difficult for those macroscopic differences in judge-
columns, curtain walls with huge windows in them,
ment that had caused diffidence on the part of scientists
and low columns arranged in three rows. The double
in the past to appear again). The invention, still at the
lantern, measuring ca 54.0 m including the roof, also
draft stage, especially for the single development in
uses binate columns and repeats the visual motifs of
sections, appears to be elaborate, above all for the def-
the drum.
inition of the volume and the internal spaces, rather
than for the resolution and the joining of the members.
2.1.2 The base
The base, consisting of three orders, rises to a total
2 THE STRUCTURE height of ca 66.0 m. The entire plan is characterised
by isolated columns spaced apart according to modules
In view of clarifying the main problem, concerning measuring 6.70 m, save for the central one, which mea-
the static equilibrium the second part of the study sures 7.80 m. The model leaves out several elements
124
chap-12 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 125
(the stairs, the pronaos, the small lanterns on the Nascè, V., Pistone, G., Strona, P.P., 1989). These stiff-
roof, which represent extensions of the stairs) whose ening elements are also used between the outer and
absence does not affect the statics of the building. Ini- inner skins of the dome, where, in similar cases,
tially, we assumed that the dome was supported by 4 Antonelli used to place stairs and pathways to sim-
big arches (Fig. 4) with pendentives, via a ring. The ulate the action of the arches (including rampant and
model was created on the basis of a highly simplified inverted arches – Fig. 5) and to make the two domes
drawing, consisting of one-dimensional “beam” ele- integral with one another.
ments for the representation of columns and pillars, The initial approach is based on a careful read-
two-dimensional “plate” elements for the walls and ing of Antonelli’s documents and the virtual model
the dome, and “brick” elements for the arches and the was defined on the basis of our knowledge of the
ring on top of them. These three elements are linked techniques and construction principles available to the
to one another at each common node in the frame. architect. This choice was dictated by the lack of suffi-
The two-dimensional and three-dimensional elements cient evidence, in terms of surveys and records. Then,
have been subdivided in their turn by means of a mesh by identifying the structural function of each element,
running parallel to the reference axes, fine enough (ca the most probable solution was identified account
150–200 cm) to reveal clearly and in greater detail the taken of the “language” of the building as a whole,
behaviour of the structure under the load-effects; brick and, above all, in accordance with the critical-scientific
elements in particular make it possible to visualise the outlook of statics and the behaviour of materials.
evolution of the state of stress inside them. The initial results were disappointing: through a
The horizontal elements – structural parts of which careful scrutiny it became apparent that the reading
nothing is known – have been replaced with a hypo- was not so immediate and that the possible solutions
thetical mesh consisting of “St. Andrew’s crosses”, could have been different.
conceived as infinitely rigid elements that can be used Hence, it was decided to maintain this design
to simulate, by changing their dimensions, conditions approach as a starting point and then proceed through
as close as possible to the real situation (Arrigoni, R., subsequent steps involving a continuous comparison
125
chap-12 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 126
between the results and the most convincing hypoth- be solved by fitting supporting elements, whether vis-
esis that gradually emerged. This method, strangely ible (something unconceivable in Antonelli’s system)
resembling Antonelli’s ways of working by successive or hidden at the top of the arches, due to the lack of
“adjustement”, proved effective and, over time, yielded filling in the extrados of the pendentives. Nor would it
results of considerable significance, even though they have been possible to resort to retaining chains, even
differed from what we had anticipated. huge ones, and therefore the different attempts made
For a better understanding of this approach, let us did not yield any appreciable improvements. From an
go over the different stages so as to provide a schematic analysis of the plan, the presence of stairs at the four
overview of how the study evolved. It should be noted corners suggested the idea of linking adjacent columns
that the hypotheses described are the ones that proved in a double continuous wall, so as to obtain a system
most significant. of symmetrical buttresses for the dome, forsaking the
idea of having isolated fulcrums in these zones.
2.2 1st Hypothesis The deformation configuration reveals an overall
subsidence of the construction l = 74 cm. Two con-
The building is assumed to be made entirely of bricks. siderations should be made at this stage: the first is that
The deformation configuration reveals an overall the situation has improved greatly, in terms both of the
subsidence of the building l = 136 cm, with a sym- deformation configuration and of stresses. The defor-
metrical evolution in the transverse ad longitudinal mation configuration clearly shows the favourable
axes y and z. In addition to bulging conspicuously, the contribution of the partition walls, especially at the
dome tends to sink vertically; in the drum this tendency ring, though the latter is badly warped internally. The
meets with no obstacle, as the columns, vertical sup- maximum values of the (tensile and compressive) prin-
ports and windows yield under the enormous weight cipal stresses are also reduced, especially where brick
of the dome. elements are concerned. From the stresses in the verti-
cal elements, it is possible to determine the evolution
2.3 2nd Hypothesis of the stresses inside the walls.
The other consideration is a persistent tendency of
It is assumed that the structure as a whole has to be the dome to move away from the pendentives and
stiffened. The dome still tends to “sink” into the base, assume a rhombus like shape (Fig. 6). This will be
which, in its turn, is unable to support it. The “beam” monitored during the subsequent stages.
elements, initially conceived as made of bricks, are
replaced with stone: this is motivated by the need to
enhance the stiffness of such a huge structure and to 2.5 4th Hypothesis
add a “precious” material befitting the aulic destina-
tion of the building. At all events, the materials are The next hypothesis entailed the use – as was often the
used according to functional criteria (placing the most case in Antonelli’s system – of stone legati (linkage by
precious materials in the most critical points). The only stone) at the critical points of the structure. In this par-
one-dimensional elements that are not replaced with ticular case, the critical points were the arches, having
stone are those making up the uprights of the windows, zones characterised by very high stresses, particularly
where bricks seem more fitting. at the keystone.
At the same time, granite ribs, conceived according From the graphic viewpoint, the arches were already
to the same criteria adopted by Antonelli for Mole, are subdivided into 12 blocks, 6 in every half arch, but
added to the dome and anchored to the masonry struc- there was no “odd” block at the keystone; this was
ture. Moreover, always with reference to the Mole, remedied by considering two blocks, one per side, plus
retaining chains are installed and connected with ties two more blocks at the reins. The deformation config-
linking the two skins. uration showed a reduction in the overall subsidence
The deformation configuration shows an overall of the building of l = 62 cm, more significant than
subsidence of the construction l = 85 cm. A slight might have been logically expected.
improvement is observed, especially in the zone of the The stresses in the vertical elements are smaller
arches and the piers underneath. Maximum principal than under the previous hypotheses. From an anal-
stresses are seen to decrease in the entire structure, ysis of the deformation configurations we find that
especially in the dome. the most important change has occurred in the brick
The problem of how to carry the enormous thrust elements (simulating the arches and the ring) which
of the arches supporting the dome is still unsolved. are directly affected by the legati. The ring dis-
plays a reduced tendency to warp internally, with a
milder slant, and the arches appear less deformed.
2.4 3rd Hypothesis
The values of maximum principal stresses and ver-
The great problem posed by the thrust of the dome tical stress are more acceptable, without substantial
and the arches that are unable to support it could not variations.
126
chap-12 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 127
127
chap-12 9/9/2004 8: 6 page 128
2.7 6th Hypothesis Table 1. Summary of the total displacements under the
various hypothesis.
The number of arches supporting the dome is
raised to 8. Hypothesis Changes l (cm)
128