A Study On Performance of Mutual Funds Introduction To The Study
A Study On Performance of Mutual Funds Introduction To The Study
A Study On Performance of Mutual Funds Introduction To The Study
Every Mutual Fund is managed by a fund manager, who using his investment
management skills and necessary research works ensures much better return than what an
investor can manage on his own. The capital appreciation and other incomes earned from
these investments are passed on to the investors (also known as unit holders) in
proportion of the number of units they own.
When an investor subscribes for the units of a mutual fund, he becomes part owner of the
assets of the fund in the same proportion as his contribution amount put up with the
corpus (the total amount of the fund). Mutual Fund investor is also known as a mutual
fund shareholder or a unit holder.
Any change in the value of the investments made into capital market instruments (such as
shares, debentures etc) is reflected in the Net Asset Value (NAV) of the scheme. NAV is
defined as the market value of the Mutual Fund scheme's assets net of its liabilities. NAV
of a scheme is calculated by dividing the market value of scheme's assets by the total
number of units issued to the investors.
For example:
A. If the market value of the assets of a fund is Rs. 100,000
B. The total number of units issued to the investors is equal to 10,000.
C. Then the NAV of this scheme = (A)/(B), i.e. 100,000/10,000 or 10.00
D. Now if an investor 'X' owns 5 units of this scheme
E. Then his total contribution to the fund is Rs. 50 (i.e. Number of units held
multiplied by the NAV of the scheme)
ADVANTAGES OF MUTUAL FUND
Costs Control Investor has to pay investment management fees and fund
Not in the distribution costs as a percentage of the value of his investments
1.
Hands of an (as long as he holds the units), irrespective of the performance
Investor of the fund.
Difficulty in Many investors find it difficult to select one option from the
Selecting a plethora of funds/schemes/plans available. For this, they may
3.
Suitable Fund have to take advice from financial planners in order to invest in
Scheme the right fund to achieve their objectives.
TYPES OF MUTUAL FUNDS
Open-end Funds | Closed-end Funds
Open-end Funds
Funds that can sell and purchase units at any point in time are classified as Open-end
Funds. The fund size (corpus) of an open-end fund is variable (keeps changing) because
of continuous selling (to investors) and repurchases (from the investors) by the fund. An
open-end fund is not required to keep selling new units to the investors at all times but is
required to always repurchase, when an investor wants to sell his units. The NAV of an
open-end fund is calculated every day.
Closed-end Funds
Funds that can sell a fixed number of units only during the New Fund Offer (NFO) period
are known as Closed-end Funds. The corpus of a Closed-end Fund remains unchanged at
all times. After the closure of the offer, buying and redemption of units by the investors
directly from the Funds is not allowed. However, to protect the interests of the investors,
SEBI provides investors with two avenues to liquidate their positions.
Load Funds | No-load Funds
Load Funds
Mutual Funds incur various expenses on marketing, distribution, advertising, portfolio
churning, fund manager's salary etc. Many funds recover these expenses from the
investors in the form of load. These funds are known as Load Funds.
No-load Funds
All those funds that do not charge any of the above mentioned loads are known as No-
load Funds.
Tax-exempt Funds | Non-Tax-exempt Funds
Tax-exempt Funds
Funds that invest in securities free from tax are known as Tax-exempt Funds. All open-
end equity oriented funds are exempt from distribution tax (tax for distributing income to
investors). Long term capital gains and dividend income in the hands of investors are tax-
free.
Non-Tax-exempt Funds
Funds that invest in taxable securities are known as Non-Tax-exempt Funds. In India, all
funds, except open-end equity oriented funds are liable to pay tax on distribution income.
Profits arising out of sale of units by an investor within 12 months of purchase are
categorized as short-term capital gains, which are taxable. Sale of units of an equity
oriented fund is subject to Securities Transaction Tax (STT). STT is deducted from the
redemption proceeds to an investor.
3. Gilt Funds
Also known as Government Securities in India, Gilt Funds invest in government papers
(named dated securities) having medium to long term maturity period. Issued by the
Government of India, these investments have little credit risk (risk of default) and provide
safety of principal to the investors. However, like all debt funds, gilt funds too are
exposed to interest rate risk. Interest rates and prices of debt securities are inversely
related and any change in the interest rates results in a change in the NAV of debt/gilt
funds in an opposite direction.
6. Commodity Funds
Those funds that focus on investing in different commodities (like metals, food grains,
crude oil etc.) or commodity companies or commodity futures contracts are termed as
Commodity Funds. A commodity fund that invests in a single commodity or a group of
commodities is a specialized commodity fund and a commodity fund that invests in all
available commodities is a diversified commodity fund and bears less risk than a
specialized commodity fund. "Precious Metals Fund" and Gold Funds (that invest in
gold, gold futures or shares of gold mines) are common examples of commodity funds.
9. Fund of Funds
Mutual funds that do not invest in financial or physical assets, but do invest in other
mutual fund schemes offered by different AMCs, are known as Fund of Funds. Fund of
Funds maintain a portfolio comprising of units of other mutual fund schemes, just like
conventional mutual funds maintain a portfolio comprising of equity/debt/money market
instruments or non financial assets. Fund of Funds provide investors with an added
advantage of diversifying into different mutual fund schemes with even a small amount
of investment, which further helps in diversification of risks. However, the expenses of
Fund of Funds are quite high on account of compounding expenses of investments into
different mutual fund schemes.
In the past decade, Indian mutual fund industry had seen a dramatic imporvements, both
qualitywise as well as quantitywise. Before, the monopoly of the market had seen an
ending phase, the Assets Under Management (AUM) was Rs. 67bn. The private sector
entry to the fund family rose the AUM to Rs. 470 bn in March 1993 and till April 2004, it
reached the height of 1,540 bn.
Putting the AUM of the Indian Mutual Funds Industry into comparison, the total of it is
less than the deposits of SBI alone, constitute less than 11% of the total deposits held by
the Indian banking industry.
The main reason of its poor growth is that the mutual fund industry in India is new in the
country. Large sections of Indian investors are yet to be intellectuated with the concept.
Hence, it is the prime responsibility of all mutual fund companies, to market the product
correctly abreast of selling.
The mutual fund industry can be broadly put into four phases according to the
development of the sector. Each phase is briefly described as under.
The setting up of the Unit Trust of India (UTI) in 1963 heralded the birth of the Indian
mutual fund industry. In 1964, UTI mutual fund launched its flagship scheme US-64 and
went on to become a generic term for the mutual fund sector till the government allowed
public sector banks to start mutual funds in 1987.
Despite being the trendsetter in the segment, the UTI mutual fund could not sustain the
initial tempo and was on the verge of a collapse in 2001, before the government bailed it
out and restructured the fund. After the restructuring, the fund has somewhat redeemed
its credibility through professional management and a booming market.
The fund's sponsors are public sector financial giants like Life Insurance Corporation,
SBI, Bank of Baroda and Punjab National Bank. The sponsors hold equal stakes in the
asset management company, UTI Asset Management Company Private Limited. UTI
Mutual Fund remains the largest fund in the country with assets of over Rs.35,028 crore
under management as of Aug 2006.
In 2003, UTI was divided into two parts, UTI Mutual Fund (UTI MF) and a specified
undertaking of UTI or UTI-I. UTI MF was brought under SEBI regulations while UTI-I
was kept under direct government control since its schemes offered guaranteed returns.
Here is a list of mutual funds of UTI which includes Liquid Funds, Income Funds, Asset
Allocation Fund, Index Funds, Equity Funds and Balanced Fund.
Reliance Mutual Fund
About Us
Reliance Mutual Fund ('RMF'/ 'Mutual Fund') is one of India’s leading Mutual Funds,
with Average Assets Under Management (AAUM) of Rs. 86,327 Crores and an investor
count of over 61.06 and 67.03 Lakh folios. (AAUM and investor count as of July - Sep
'12) Source : http://www.amfiindia.com/
Reliance Mutual Fund, a part of the Reliance Group, is one of the fastest growing mutual
funds in India. RMF offers investors a well-rounded portfolio of products to meet varying
investor requirements and has presence in 179 cities across the country. Reliance Mutual
Fund constantly endeavors to launch innovative products and customer service initiatives
to increase value to investors. Reliance Capital Asset Management Limited (‘RCAM’) is
the asset manager of Reliance Mutual Fund. RCAM is a subsidiary of Reliance Capital
Limited (RCL). Presently, RCL holds 65.23% of its total issued and paid-up equity share
capital and the balance of its issued and paid up equity share capital is held by other
shareholders which includes Nippon Life Insurance Company (“NLI”), holding 26% of
RCAM’s total issued and paid up equity share capital. NLI acquired the said 26% share
holding in RCAM on August 17, 2012.
Reliance Capital Ltd. is one of India’s leading and fastest growing private sector financial
services companies, and ranks among the top 3 private sector financial services and
banking companies, in terms of net worth. Reliance Capital Ltd. has interests in asset
management, life and general insurance, private equity and proprietary investments, stock
broking and other financial services
HDFC Mutual Fund has been one of the best performing mutual funds in the last few
years. HDFC Asset Management Company Limited (AMC) functions as an Asset
Management Company for the HDFC Mutual Fund.
AMC is a joint venture between housing finance giant HDFC and British investment firm
Standard Life Investments Limited. It conducts the operations of the Mutual Fund and
manages assets of the schemes, including the schemes launched from time to time. As of
Aug 2006, the fund has assets of Rs.25,892 crores under management.
IN 2003, following a decision by the Zurich Insurance Company (ZIC), the Sponsor of
Zurich India Mutual Fund, to divest its asset management business in India, AMC had
entered into an agreement with ZIC to acquire the asset management business.
Consequently, all the schemes of Zurich Mutual Fund in India had been transferred to
HDFC Mutual Fund and renamed as HDFC schemes.
Here is a list of mutual funds of HDFC which includes Equity Funds, Balanced Funds
and Debt Funds.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Need for the study:
In India very little work has been done to investigate fund managers forecasting abilities.
Active fund managers are expected to reward higher return. If the fund manager feels that
market on the whole overvalued, then he would get out the market. Hence the present
study has the objective of finding out the performance of mutual funds schemes in the
frame work of risk and returns.
Objectives of the study:
1. To understand the basic concepts of mutual funds and its benefits as an
investment avenue.
2. To understand the importance of mutual funds in investing money
3. To analyze the performance of different mutual funds on the basis of various
parameters
4. To analyze the alternative investment options for investing money
5. To analyze the risk, return, volatility of mutual funds.
Primary data: the data collected first hand by the researcher concerned with the
research problem refers to the primary data.
Secondary data
The information available at various sources made for some other purpose but facilitating
the study undertaken is called as secondary data.
Limitations of the study:
1. Time constraint
2. The data collected from the respondents may not be reliable. So the fluctuations in
the result might occur.
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Interpretation:
The NAV of UTI Gold Exchange over the years fluctuating and in the month Dec it is at
2889 which has slightly decreased from the previous year.
DETERMINATION OF RISK AND RETURNS AS ON 2012
Treynor Ratio = (Average Return of the Portfolio – Average Return of the Risk free rate)/
Beta
= -0.887604857
Sharpe Measure = (Average Return of the Portfolio – Average Return of the Risk free
rate)/S.D.
= -7.97709074
Jensen Measure = Portfolio Return − [Risk Free Rate + Portfolio Beta * (Market Return −
Risk Free Rate)]
= -0.117048042
Interpretation:
The overall risk of the mutual fund as measured by the standard deviation of the
total returns of the fund returns for the period from 1 st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -0.17.
The systematic Risk of the Mutual fund as given by the β coefficient for the
period from 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012 is 0.20.
Treynor’s Measure for the fund for the period from 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -0.88 which indicate that for every one unit change in the beta there will -0.88
unit charges in the returns.
Sharpe’s Measure for the fund for the period from 1 st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -7.97 which indicates that for every one unit change in the standard deviation
there will be 0.02 units change in the returns.
Jensen’s Measure for the fund for the period 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012 is –
0.11.
RELIANCE MUTUAL FUNDS EQUITY SHARE PRICES AS ON 2012
Interpretation:
Over the Period Reliance gold exchange has a steady increase in the NAV and has
reached its peak in the month Dec 2012.
DETEMINATION OF RISK AND RETURNS (2012)
Treynor Ratio = (Average Return of the Portfolio – Average Return of the Risk free rate)/
Beta
= -0.994906677
Sharpe Measure = (Average Return of the Portfolio – Average Return of the Risk free
rate)/S.D.
= -9.370494859
Jensen Measure = Portfolio Return − [Risk Free Rate + Portfolio Beta * (Market Return −
Risk Free Rate)]
= -0.123837483
Interpretation:
The overall risk of the mutual fund as measured by the standard deviation of the
total returns of the fund returns for the period from 1 st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -0.19.
The systematic Risk of the Mutual fund as given by the β coefficient for the
period from 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012 is 0.18.
Treynor’s Measure for the fund for the period from 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -0.99 which indicate that for every one unit change in the beta there will -0.99
unit charges in the returns.
Sharpe’s Measure for the fund for the period from 1 st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -9.37 which indicates that for every one unit change in the standard deviation
there will be -0.01 units change in the returns.
Jensen’s Measure for the fund for the period 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012 is –
0.012.
HDFC MUTUAL FUNDS EQUITY SHARE PRICES AS 2012
Interpretation:
The NAV of HDFC Gold Exchange over the years fluctuating and in the month Dec it is
at 3013.68 which has slightly decreased from the previous year.
DETEMINATION OF RISK AND RETURNS (2012)
Treynor Ratio = (Average Return of the Portfolio – Average Return of the Risk free rate)/
Beta
= -0.860231635
Sharpe Measure = (Average Return of the Portfolio – Average Return of the Risk free
rate)/S.D.
= -7.920489062
Jensen Measure = Portfolio Return − [Risk Free Rate + Portfolio Beta * (Market Return −
Risk Free Rate)]
= -0.115044863
Interpretation:
The overall risk of the mutual fund as measured by the standard deviation of the
total returns of the fund returns for the period from 1 st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -0.18.
The systematic Risk of the Mutual fund as given by the β coefficient for the
period from 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012 is 0.20.
Treynor’s Measure for the fund for the period from 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -0.86 which indicate that for every one unit change in the beta there will -0.86
unit charges in the returns.
Sharpe’s Measure for the fund for the period from 1 st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -7.92 which indicates that for every one unit change in the standard deviation
there will be 0.22 units change in the returns.
Jensen’s Measure for the fund for the period 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012 is –
0.11.
AXIS EQUITY SHARE PRICE AS ON 2012
Month Open High Price Low Close No. of No. of Total
Price Price Price Shares Trades Turnover(Rs.)
Jan-12 2,651.00 2,799.00 2,615.00 2,769.28 408 76 11,01,795
Feb-12 2,750.00 2,800.00 2,700.00 2,775.22 519 81 14,19,209
Mar-12 2,786.00 2,800.00 2,685.00 2,738.75 326 64 8,91,818
Apr-12 2,787.00 2,999.00 2,679.00 2,823.01 717 171 20,11,833
May-12 2,859.90 3,434.00 2,722.01 2,874.00 1,162 183 32,79,954
Jun-12 2,807.31 2,964.99 2,807.31 2,864.18 618 145 17,97,872
Jul-12 2,962.00 2,962.00 2,802.03 2,941.87 715 115 20,59,828
Aug-12 2,890.01 3,064.83 2,853.03 3,020.00 1,295 211 38,07,093
Sep-12 3,020.00 3,369.00 3,020.00 3,075.00 1,910 273 60,15,029
Oct-12 3,118.98 3,118.98 2,981.20 3,036.99 831 191 25,24,512
Nov-12 3,042.99 3,200.00 2,975.00 3,070.00 15,075 452 4,73,05,487
Dec-12 3,139.95 3,139.95 2,930.00 2,980.36 1,223 315 36,84,851
Interpretation:
The NAV of AXIS Gold Exchange over the years fluctuating and in the month Dec it is
at 2930 which has slightly decreased from the previous year.
DETERMINATION OF RISK AND RETURNS AS ON 2012
Month BSE-500 Axis INDEX Axis Mutual
Mutual RETURNS Fund
Fund RETURNS
Jan-12 6549.31 2,769.28 -0.04491 -0.00214
Feb-12 6857.28 2,775.22 0.014446 0.013316
Mar-12 6759.63 2,738.75 0.009124 -0.02985
Apr-12 6698.51 2,823.01 0.066635 -0.01774
May-12 6280.04 2,874.00 -0.06022 0.003429
Jun-12 6682.47 2,864.18 0.011622 -0.02641
Jul-12 6605.7 2,941.87 -0.00402 -0.02587
Aug-12 6632.34 3,020.00 -0.07967 -0.01789
Sep-12 7206.51 3,075.00 0.012325 0.012516
Oct-12 7118.77 3,036.99 -0.04733 -0.01075
Nov-12 7472.45 3,070.00 -0.00842 0.030077
Dec-12 7535.92 2,980.36 -0.13042 -0.07131
Treynor Ratio = (Average Return of the Portfolio – Average Return of the Risk free rate)/
Beta
= 6.010199433
Sharpe Measure = (Average Return of the Portfolio – Average Return of the Risk free
rate)/S.D.
= -9.233172798
Jensen Measure = Portfolio Return − [Risk Free Rate + Portfolio Beta * (Market Return −
Risk Free Rate)]
= -0.18929694
Interpretation:
The overall risk of the mutual fund as measured by the standard deviation of the
total returns of the fund returns for the period from 1 st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -0.004.
The systematic Risk of the Mutual fund as given by the β coefficient for the
period from 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012 is -0.02.
Treynor’s Measure for the fund for the period from 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is 6.01 which indicate that for every one unit change in the beta there will 6.01
unit charges in the returns.
Sharpe’s Measure for the fund for the period from 1 st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012
is -9.23which indicates that for every one unit change in the standard deviation
there will be 0.01 units change in the returns.
Jensen’s Measure for the fund for the period 1st Jan 2012 to 31st Dec 2012 is –
0.18.
FINDINGS
a. The average return of the fund is lower than that of the average market return
which indicates that the fund is not performing well as compared to the market
b. The standard deviation of 0.01 indicates the amount of risk involved in investing
in the fund.
c. The fund’s beta of 0.18 is relatively lower than that of the market index which
gives the idea that the proportionate change in the fund resulting from the change
in the market index is relatively low.
a. The average return of the fund is lower than that of the average market return
which indicates that the fund is not performing well as compared to the market
b. The standard deviation of 0.022 indicates the amount of risk involved in investing
in the fund.
c. The fund’s beta of -0.21 is relatively lower than that of the market index which
gives the idea that the proportionate change in the fund resulting from the change
in the market index is relatively low.
3. AXIS Gold Scheme
Average Returns -0.07
Market Average Return -0.13
Standard Deviation 0.019
Beta -0.02
a. The average return of the fund is lower than that of the average market return
which indicates that the fund is not performing well as compared to the market
b. The standard deviation of 0.019 indicates the amount of risk involved in investing
in the fund.
c. The fund’s beta of -0.02 is relatively lower than that of the market index which
gives the idea that the proportionate change in the fund resulting from the change
in the market index is relatively low.
4. UTI Gold Scheme
Average Returns -0.081
Market Average Return -0.13
Standard Deviation 0.022
Beta 0.20
d. The average return of the fund is lower than that of the average market return
which indicates that the fund is not performing well as compared to the market
e. The standard deviation of 0.022 indicates the amount of risk involved in investing
in the fund.
f. The fund’s beta of 0.2 is relatively lower than that of the market index which
gives the idea that the proportionate change in the fund resulting from the change
in the market index is relatively low.
Treynor’s Index
Name Value Rankings
UTI Gold Scheme -0.88 3
Out of these 4, AXIS Gold scheme has high Treynor’s value. This implies that AXIS
Gold Scheme has been the most profitable when the relative risks involved in the
investments have been taken into account.
Sharpe’s Index
Name Value Rankings
UTI Gold Scheme -7.97 2
AXIS Gold Scheme -9.23 3
RELIANCE Gold Scheme -9.37 4
HDFC Gold Scheme -7.92 1
From the above Sharpe’s risk, compared to other Gold Schemes’ HDFC gold scheme is
giving more return for the same risk.
Jensen’s Index
Name Value Rankings
UTI Gold Scheme -0.117 3
AXIS Gold Scheme -0.18 4
RELIANCE Gold Scheme -0.12 1
HDFC Gold Scheme -0.115 2
Jensen’s alpha is used to determine the abnormal return of a security or a portfolio. From
the above table it is understood that HDFC, Reliance Gold scheme have high expected
returns with high risky assets.
Suggestions:
1. The investors who are ready to take risk can invest in HDFC and AXIS Gold
Scheme are suggested to invest because the risk is high and the returns are more.
2. The investors who are not much interested in taking risk can invest in UTI gold
scheme because it is giving high returns with a given risk.
3. The investor can also invest in HDFC gold scheme which is 2 positions in the
category of low risk- more returns and more returns- with a given risk.
4. Investors are suggested to not invest in Reliance Gold scheme which is highly
volatile.
Conclusion:
The study on performance of mutual funds was undertaken with an objective of
understanding the basic concepts of mutual funds and its benefits as an investment
avenue and to understand the importance of mutual funds in investing money. It was also
taken up with and objective of analyzing the performance of different mutual fund
schemes on the basis of various parameters and to analyze the alternative investment
options for investing money.
The study covers Equity linked schemes of Icici, Birla Sunlife, Kotak, Uti gold scheme in
which share khan is a distributor. The study was done using the closing and opening
prices of above schemes, Trenoys’ index, sharpen index and Jensens’ index. The entire
study is based on the secondary data only. The study is done at Hyderabad for a period of
60days. The study had few limitations which were taken care of.
The financial information obtained was analyzed using the appropriate techniques and it
was found that that the HDFC Gold Scheme has been the most profitable when the
relative risks involved in the investments have been taken into account and AXIS gold
scheme is giving more return for the same risk.
It is suggested to the investors who are ready to take risk can invest in AXIS Gold
Scheme are suggested to invest because the risk is less and the returns are more and to
invest HDFC gold scheme which is No. 2 position in the category of low risk- more
returns and more returns- with a given risk.
Bibliography:
1. S.Kelvin, Security analysis and portfolio management, 1st edition, phi-learning
publications, 2009.
2. Bhat Sudhindra, Security analysis and portfolio management, 1st edition, excel
books, 2007.
3. Rohini singh, Security analysis and portfolio management, 1st edition, Excel
Books, 2009
4. M. Ranganatham, R. Madhumathi, Security analysis and portfolio management,
2nd edition, Pearson publications, 2012.
Websites:
1. www.investopedia.com
2. www.managementparadise.com
3. www.wikipedia.com
4. www.iloveindia.com
5. www.icicibank.com
6. www.kotak.com
7. www.hdfc.com
8. www.sbi.co.in