Handouts 38
Handouts 38
Handouts 38
Lesson 38
FINANCE/ACCOUNTING ISSUES
Learning objectives
The main objective of this chapter to enable to students about accounting and finance issue relating to
strategy implementation.
Like marketing and human resource concern while implementing strategy the other important issue is
accounting and finance. Several issue that concern with accounting and finance to strategy
implementation: obtaining desired amount of needed capital, developing pro forma financial
statements, preparing financial budgets, and evaluating the worth of a business. Some examples of
decisions that may require finance/accounting policies are:
1. To raise the amount of capital by issuing shares or obtaining a debt from external parties.
2. To enhance the inventory turn over level
3. To make or buy fixed assets.
4. To extend the time of accounts receivable.
5. To establish a certain percentage discount on accounts within a specified period of time.
6. To determine the amount of cash that should be kept on hand
7. To determine an appropriate dividend payout ratio.
8. To use LIFO, FIFO
It also include an Earnings per Share/Earnings before Interest and Taxes (EPS/EBIT) analysis is the
most widely used technique for determining whether debt, stock, or a combination of debt and stock is
the best alternative for raising capital to implement strategies. This technique involves an examination
of the impact that debt versus stock financing has on earnings per share under various assumptions as
to EBIT.
DEBIT
A financial measure defined as revenues less cost of goods sold and selling, general, and administrative
expenses. In other words, operating and no operating profit before the deduction of interest and
income taxes.
earning periods, too much debt in the capital structure of an organization can endanger stockholders'
return and jeopardize company survival. Fixed debt obligations generally must be met, regardless of
circumstances. This does not mean that stock issuances are always better than debt for raising capital.
Some special concerns with stock issuances are dilution of ownership, effect on stock price, and the
need to share future earnings with all new shareholders.
EPS/EBIT analysis is a valuable tool for making capital financing decisions needed to implement
strategies, but several considerations should be made whenever using this technique. First, profit levels
may be higher for stock or debt alternatives when EPS levels are lower. For example, looking only at
the earnings after taxes (EAT) values in Table 8-3, the common stock option is the best alternative,
regardless of economic conditions. If the Brown Company's mission includes strict profit
maximization, as opposed to the maximization of stockholders' wealth or some other criterion, then
stock rather than debt is the best choice of financing.
Another consideration when using EPS/EBIT analysis is flexibility. As an organization's capital
structure changes, so does its flexibility for considering future capital needs. Using all debt or all stock
to raise capital in the present may impose fixed obligations, restrictive covenants, or other constraints
that could severely reduce a firm's ability to raise additional capital in the future.
Prior
Projected
Year Remarks
Year 2005
2005
PRO FORMA INCOME
STATEMENT
Sales 1000 1500 50% increase
Cost of Goods Sold 700 1050 70% of sales
Gross Margin 300 450
Selling Expense 100 150 10% of sales
Administrative Expense 100 150 10% of sales
Interest 50 50
Earnings Before Taxes 50 100
Taxes 25 50 50% rate
Net Income 25 50
Dividends 10 20
Retained Earnings 15 30
PRO FORMA BALANCE
SHEET
Assets
Cash 5 7.75 Plug figure
Accounts Receivable 2 4.00 Incr. 100%
Inventory 20 45.00
Total Current Assets 27 56.75
Land 15 15.00
Plant and Equipment 50 80.00 Add 3 new plants at
$10 million each
Less Depreciation 10 20.00
Net Plant and Equipment 40 60.00
Total Fixed Assets 55 75.00
Total Assets 82 131.75
Liabilities
Accounts Payable 10 10.00
Notes Payable 10 10.00
Total Current Liabilities 20 20.00
Long-Term Debt 40 70.00 Borrowed $30 million
Additional Paid-in-Capital 20 35.00 Issued 100,000 shares
at $150 each
Retained Earnings 2 6.75 2 + 4.75
Total Liabilities and Net Worth 82 131.75
Financial Budgets
“Document that details how funds will be obtained and spent for a specified period of time.”
Types of Budgets
– Cash budgets
– Operating budgets
– Sales budgets
– Profit budgets
– Factory budgets
– Capital budgets
– Expense budgets
– Divisional budgets
– Variable budgets
– Flexible budgets
– Fixed budgets
Annual budgets are most common, although the period of time for a budget can range from one day to
more than ten years. Fundamentally, financial budgeting is a method for specifying what must be done
to complete strategy implementation successfully. Financial budgeting should not be thought of as a
tool for limiting expenditures but rather as a method for obtaining the most productive and profitable
use of an organization's resources. Financial budgets can be viewed as the planned allocation of a firm's
resources based on forecasts of the future.
Financial budgets have some limitations. First, budgetary programs can become so detailed that they are
cumbersome and overly expensive. Over budgeting or under budgeting can cause problems. Second,
financial budgets can become a substitute for objectives. A budget is a tool and not an end in itself.
Third, budgets can hide inefficiencies if based solely on precedent rather than periodic evaluation of
circumstances and standards. Finally, budgets are sometimes used as instruments of tyranny that result
in frustration, resentment, absenteeism, and high turnover. To minimize the effect of this last concern,
managers should increase the participation of subordinates in preparing budgets.
The first approach in evaluating the worth of a business is determining its net worth or stockholders'
equity. Net worth represents the sum of common stock, additional paid-in capital, and retained
earnings.
The second approach to measuring the value of a firm grows out of the belief that the worth of any
business should be based largely on the future benefits its owners may derive through net profits.
The third approach, letting the market determine a business's worth, involves three methods.
1. First, base the firm's worth on the selling price of a similar company. A potential problem,
however, is that sometimes comparable figures are not easy to locate, even though substantial
information on firms that buy or sell to other firms is available in major libraries.
2. The second approach is called the price-earnings ratio method. To use this method, divide the market
price of the firm's common stock by the annual earnings per share and multiply this number by the
firm's average net income for the past five years.
3. The third approach can be called the outstanding shares method. To use this method, simply multiply
the number of shares outstanding by the market price per share and add a premium. The premium
is simply a per share dollar amount that a person or firm is willing to pay to control (acquire) the
other company.