Outline of A History of Differential Geometry
Outline of A History of Differential Geometry
Author(s): D. J. Struik
Source: Isis , Apr., 1933, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Apr., 1933), pp. 92-120
Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science
Society
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/225188?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The History of Science Society and The University of Chicago Press are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis
(*) This outline was given in a series of ten' lectures at the Massachusetts Instit
of Technology during fall and winter of 1931-32.
wars, remarks that most people measure the size of towns or camps
by their perimeter, and that they can hardly believe that Sparta,
with a circumference of 48 stadia, is twice as large as Megalopolis
with a circumference of 50 stadia. (5) The mathematics of this
problem seems to go back to the time before ARISTOTLE. A series
of theorems is found in a paper by ZENODORUS (about I50 B.C.),
who stated that the circle is larger than all plane figures of the
same circumference, and the sphere larger than all solid figures
of the same area. Exact proofs, as a matter of fact, date back
only to the igth century.
Then there is the problem of mapping the earth on a plane,
a problem which offered itself to those geographers of Antiquity
who recognized the earth as a sphere. The principal contribution
is due to PTOLEMY (I50 A.D.), though we may readily believe that
his ideas were those of HIPPARCH, who lived three centuries earlier.
In PTOLEMY'S Geography, Chapter 24, we find what we now call
the stereographic projection. He takes the equator as plane of
mapping, and he not only explains the projection, but also shows
its conformal character. He also modifies the projection by
mapping the figure on a cone tangent to the sphere. This allows
a good representation of that part of the earth known to PTOLEMY.
The " map of the world according to PTOLEMY," reproduced in
many textbooks, is drawn in this projection. (6)
We cannot deal here with the reasons for the slow progress
of differential geometry in Antiquity, as it is only one aspect of
the much more general problem why antiquity did not advance
beyond ARCHIMEDES in the calculus of infinitesimals. We remark
that it has to do only, in a general way, with the fact that the
economic system on which the Mediterranean culture was based
already began to decay in the last centuries of the Roman republic.
Many new methods of mapping a sphere on a plane were
invented in the sixteenth century, when the great discoveries gra-
(S) POLYBIUS lived from 201-lI9 B.C. The place is from his Books IX, 21.
Our information on isoperimetry is taken from W. SCHMIDT, " Geschichte der
Isoperimetrie im Altertume," Bibliotheca mathematica (3)2 (1901), P. 5-8. See
also M. CANTOR, Vorlesungen I, 3( ed., p. 357.
(6) Map projections also in PTOLEMY'S " Planisphaerum " and " Analemma."
The name "stereographic projection " is due to F. D'AIGUILLON (1566-I6I7),
a Belgian Jesuit, who has Monge, central, and stereographic projection in his
" Optics " (16I3). (He calls the first two orthographic and scenographic).
(I2) LEIBNIZ, De linea ex lineis numero infinitis ordinatim ductis inter se con-
currentenbus formata easque omnes tangente. Acta Eruditorum I692. LEIBNIZ
Math. Schriften, ed. GERHARDT, II I, p. 266-269.
(I3) LEIBNIZ. Genetalia de natura linearum, anguiloque contactus et osculi.
Math. Schriften 2e Abh. III, P. 331-337.
(I4) Differential calculus: Ostwald's Klassiker 2II, Integral Calculus (Opera III,
P. 386): Ostzvald's Klassiker I94.
scarcely break the record. Before 1700 many new curves are
discovered, many ordinary differential equations are solved, the
first elliptic integral is introduced, and the calculus of variations is
set up. In I697 and I698, the BERNOULLIS study geodesic lines
on a surface; JOHANN discovers that osculating plane and tangent
plane are perpendicular: " quod planum transiens per tria quaelibet
puncta proxima lineae quaesitae debeat esse rectum ad planum
tangens superficiem curvam in aliquo istorum punctorum." (I5)
The equation of the geodesic lines does not appear either in print
or in private letters, though JOHANN claims that he has found
it. (i6) JACOB also outlines an inquiry into the so-called isoperi-
metrical problems. Both brothers investigate orthogonal and
more general trajectories in the plane. The name " trajectory "
occurs in a letter of JOHANN to LEIBNIZ of I698. (17) An applic-
ation of this theory was found in the theory of light in a medium
of varying density, under HUYGENS' assumption that a ray of
light intersects the wave front orthogonally. An application of
JACOB lies in the finding of the orthogonal trajectories of logarithmic
curves.
The problem was taken up again in I716, when LEIBNIZ, in
the priority quarrel, tried to induce NEWTON to show the power
of his methods. He asked NEWTON (via CONTI) to find the
orthogonal trajectory to a given set of curves, for instance, all
hyperbolas of equal center and vertex. NEWTON answered, but
only in a general way and his answer does not suggest the best
method of attack. He seems to indicate that the finding of
orthogonal trajectories depends on the determination of their
center of curvatures as intersections of consecutive normals to
the given curves; this suggests a differential equation of the second
order instead of the first. (i8)
This brings us to the question of the contributions of NEWTON
to the application of analysis to geometry. Here we are unable
to find much worth mentioning except his general method. If
(I 5) For the literature see M. CANTOR, Vorlesungen III (I908), p. 229, 232,
23 5. The quoted passage in a letter to LEIBNIZ of August I698.
(i6) In letters to LEIBNIZ, see G. ENESTR6M, Sur la decouverte de l'equation
gen6rale des lignes geod6siques, Bibliotheca mathematica 13 (I899), p. 19-24.
(17) JOH. BERNOULLI, Opera I, p. 266, see CANTOR III, P. 222, 233, 443-445.
(i8) See CANTOR III, P. 444, 445.
(22) H. PITOT, Quadrature de la moitie d'une courbe des arcs, appellee la com-
pagne de la cycloide. Histoire de I'Academie de Sciences, 1724, publ. 1726,
P. 107-113.
of first and second curvature. " J'ai cruf devoir appeller ces sortes
de courbes, courbes 'a double courbure, parce qu'en les conside6rant
de la fagon qu'on vient de dire elles participent pour ainsi dire
toujours de la courbure de deux courbes, et c'est m'eme le nom
qu'on leur donne dans un memoire de l'Academie Royale des
Sciences ou on les propose comme un objet digne des recherches
des geometres ", are CLAIRAUT 'S words.
CLAIRAUT soon became interested in geodetic work, and in
a paper of 1733 on this subject he came to the theorem on surfaces
of revolution bearing his name; this theorem states that along
a geodesic line C
p sin a const,
where p is the radius of the parallel circle and a the angle of C
with that circle (23). Later he came to integrability conditions
of differential equations in studies on hydrostatics. It deserves
mention as a first step in what we now call PFAFF'S problem. (24)
He found that
MUdx + Ndy + Pdz o
is exact, when and only when,
/8 +P N 8 +M P8 - -N i
M ( 3N Jr N (P- Mz (My AxN
(26) JOHANN BERNOULLI had the equation also in I728, printed in his Opera IV
(I744) P. io8. Here the word " planum osculans " for the first time.
(27) See CANTOR III, P. 784.
(28) L. EULER, Introductio in analysin infinitorum, II, ch. XIV.
r= 2 f g -
f + g + (f-g) cos 2a
where f and g are the extreme values of r, the radius of curvature
of a normal section, and a is the angle of this normal section
with one of the normal sections of extreme curvature. The
form under which we know the theorem is due to DUPIN, but
the name " section principale " is due to EULER, as well as the
theorem that the two sections of extreme curvature are normal
to each other. His demonstration starts with an arbitrary plane
section through a point of the surface, then proceeds to an expres-
sion of the radius of curvature for this section, the expression
being gradually simplified.
Shortly afterwards (I762) LAGRANGE (I736-I8I3), then a young
for the first time, as " ligne des pales," " arete de rebroussement,"
" developpee." Many applications to plane and space curves
illustrate the general theorems.
In 1780 MONGE published a second paper, written in I775 (35),
in which he took up EULER'S theory of developables. MONGE
intends to simplify EULER'S results. But in his hands the whole
theory takes another shape. The geometrical part is treated
in such a way as to make the great author of the Recherches
sur la courbure des surfaces and of many more contributions to
geometry more analyst than geometer. Nevertheless there is a
good deal of the analyst in MONGE. But the formulas always
follow the dynamics of geometrical development, so that the
integration of a partial differential equation becomes the gradual
building up of a geometrical system in space. Nobody except
LIE ever equalled MONGE in this direction.
MONGE points out the essential difference between general
ruled surfaces and developables, sets up the differential relation
rt -S2 = o and finds as first integral that there is an arbitrary
relation between p and q, which means that a developable is always
tangent surface to a space curve. It is also the envelope of a two
parameter family of planes. Application is made to the tangent
developable of two surfaces, which was already partly elucidated
in EULER'S work, but which as a problem of " ombres et pe-
nombres " had a great attraction for the inventor of descriptive
geometry. We also find here the differential equation of the
third order for the ruled surfaces, with the solution of the problem
of finding the ruled surface passing through three space curves.
The volume of the Memoires des savans etrangers, of 1785,
which contains MONGE'S first paper, contains another classic of
differential geometry, MEUSNIER'S Memoire sur la courbure des
surfaces, written in I776. (36) The title already shows the
indebtedness of the author to EULER. MONGE had, indeed,
(37) G. DARBOUX, Notice historique sur le g6neral MEUSNIER, I909. In " Eloges
academiques et discours, Paris", HERMANN, I9I2, p. 2i8-262. GOETHE describes
how he watched the French soldiers, defeated, leaving Mayence. They carried
the body of MEUSNIER away with them.
(45) The most interesting edition is the fifth, with notes of J. LIOUVILLE, i850.
The " Feuilles d'Analyse " appeared again in i8oi.
5. - Monge's Pupils
(46) A. M. AMPE'RE, Sur les avantages qu'on peut retirer, dans la theorie des
courbes, de la consideration des paraboles osculatrices, avec des reflexions sur
les fonctions differentielles dont la valeur ne change pas lors de la transformation
des axes (presented I803). Journal Ec. Polyt. I4e cah. (i8o8), P. 159-181.
(47) See p. 178 of AMPERE's paper.
R R1 R2
DUPIN continued his research in the Applications, where he
attacked many problems in applied fields, as stability of floating
bodies, optics, and " deblais et remblais." Here, moreover, we
also find the correction of " MALUS-DUPIN'S theorem" on normal
systems of straight lines, and the " cyclide " of DUPIN. (57)
DUPIN lived to a ripe age, but did not continue his work on
geometry. His travels led him to many countries, and he became
especially interested in the growth of capitalism in England,
which he liked to propagate in France. This he did in a great
number of papers and books on social subjects. He entered
politics, became " pair de France " under the Restauration and
"senateur."
As representative of the purely geometrical school of MONGE
in the time of the Restoration we have Louis L. VALLAE (I804-
I864), a prominent civil engineer, who wrote a Traite' de gdom6trie
descriptive in I8I9, reprinted in I825, and dedicated to MONGE.
It contains the theory of space curves and surfaces, showing
how their theory is built up by geometrical reasoning. Here
we find for the first time the word " angle de courbure " together
with " angle de torsion." VALLAE reveals to us why geometry
should be studied, quoting MONGE: " Pour faire fleurir l'industrie
fran9aise, il faut diriger l'education nationale vers la connaissance
(to be continued.)
Mass. Institute of Technology February 1932
Cambridge, Mass, D. J. STRUIK.
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/224886?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The History of Science Society and The University of Chicago Press are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis
(II)
6. - GAUSS
(i) Printed in Astronomische Abh. I825. See GAUSS Werke IV, p. I89-2I6.
The paper was a solution to a problem posed by the Academy at Copenhagen
in I822.
(2) C. F. GAuss, Untersuchungen uiber hohere Geodisie, I, II, Gdttingen Abh.
2 (I844), 3 (I847), GAuss' Werke IV, p. 259-300, 30I-340.
(3) The older ms. has the title: " Neue allgemeine Untersuchungen uiber
die krummen Flatchen " (I825), Werke VIII, p. 408 (with remarks of STACKEL).
The " Disquisitiones " were published in Commentationes soc. reg. sc. G6ttingensis,
6 (i828), Werke IV, p. 2I7-258. English translations of both papers by
J. C. MOREHEAD and A. M. HILTEBEITEL. Princeton Univers. Library, I902,
P. I26, with bibliography of papers using GAUSS' method, and many notes.
(4) That GAUSS was acquainted with MONGE'S contributions to geometry is
shown by his favorable review of MONGE'S " Geometrie descriptive," Gott. gel.
Anzeiger i8I3, Werke IV, p. 359-360.
(5) A. M. LEGENDRE, Mem. div. sav. 1787, P. 358; also in the Appendix,
Section 5, to his trigonometry. LEGENDRE's theorem was known to G.Auss
Disquisitiones, Sec. 27.
GUES even had found the ratio between the surface elements
of surface and unit sphere. But, though they were known to
EULER, nobody had sensed their importance before GAUSS, and
that after fifty years of productivity in France. And the light
that GAUSS throws on both old and new conceptions as intrinsic
properties of the surface was altogether new.
The invariance of the curvature under bending has been found
in papers of GAUSS dating back to i822. In these papers he uses
the linear element of his paper on map projection, ds2 = m2 (dt2 +
du2).
However, nothing in the Disquisitiones, as KLEIN remarks, (6)
shows that GAUSS. kept his boldest ideas to himself. His manu-
scripts show that he was in possession of the non-Euclidean
geometry when writing his paper on surfaces, but he did not
hint at it even remotely. But it throws a new and better light
upon his theorem on the sum of the angles of a geodesic triangle.
It was a theorem enabling the physicist to test the nature of
physical space. It was a step in the direction later consistently
followed by RIEMANN and HELMHOLTZ. GAUSS indeed measured
geodesical triangles, but did not find confirmation of his belief
that there might be a perceptible curvature (negative, as GAUSS
thought, in agreement with the later theories of LOBATSCHEWSKY
and BOLYAI) of space.
Of GAUSS' contribution to notation and nomenclature we mention
the symbols E, F, G, D, D', D" for what we now call the coefficients
of the first and second fundamental differential form, and the
word " conformal." (6a)
GAUSS became the teacher of the entire learned world, but
he created no direct school as MONGE had done. Conditions
in Germany were different from those in France. The only
exception, so far as differential geometry is concerned, was FERDI-
NAND MINDING (I806-I885) in far-away Dorpat, who filled the
(9) C. G. J. JACOBI, Posthumous paper: Ober die Curve, welche alle von
einem Punkte ausgehenden geodfitischen Linien eines Rotationsellipsoides beruhrt.
Ges. Werke VII, p. 72-80.
(Io) C. G. J. JACOBI, Ober einige merkwuirdige Curventheoreme, Astron.
Nachr. 20 (I842), p. 115-120. Ges. Werke VII, p. 34-39.
(I I) H. F. SCHERK, Bemerkungen uber die kleinste Flache innerhalb gegebener
Grenzen. Crelle I3, x835, p. I85; earlier in a Latin paper in Acta Soc. ablo-
novianae 4 (I830).
(12) J. STEINER, Einfache Beweise der isoperimetrischen Hauptsatze, Crelle
has three chapters on curves and surfaces, treated for the first
time in an invariant symbolism. His work leads to DUPIN'S
results on the indicatrix, and he claims to be an independent disco-
verer of its properties; it was only after he had his results, he
writes, that he discovered them in DUPIN's Developpements. (I3)
Accordingly, not only in Germany was there little immediate
response to GAUSS' work, but also in France, where, moreover,
the MONGE tradition was still very much alive. We may even feel
a certain polemical note in a paper written by SOPHIE GERMAIN,
(at that time already fifty-five), in Crelle I83I, recommending the
(14) G. LAME, Memoire sur les surfaces isothermes, Journ. de math. (I0)2 (I837),
p. 149; Memoire sur les coordonnees curvilignes, ib. 5 (I840), p. 313-347.
(I5) G. LAME, Le,ons sur la theorie mathematique de 1'dlectricit6 (I852);
Le,ons sur les fonctions inverses des transcendantes et les surfaces isothermes
(I857); Le,ons sur les coordonnees curvilignes et leur diverses applications (I859);
Le,ons sur la theorie analytique de la chaleur (i86i).
(i6) SAINT-VENANT, Mdmoire sur les lignes courbes non planes. J7ourn. Ec.
Polyt. cah. 30 (I846), p. I-76.
(2I) F. FRENET, Sur les courbes a double courbure. These Toulouse, I847.
Abstract in Yourn. de Math. I7 (I852), p. 437.
(22) J. A. SERRET, Sur quelques formules relatives a la theorie des courbes
a double courbure. Journ. de Math. i6 (I851), p. I93.
(23) F. JOACHIMSTHAL, Anwendung der Differential- und Integralrechnung
auf die allgemeine Theorie der Fliichen und der Linien doppelter Krummung.
Leipzig I872. This excellent introduction, one of the first to appear in Germany,
gives a symposium of the results of the French school and those of GAUSS and
JACOBI.
8. - RIEMANN
I2
(37) D. CODAZZI, Memoire relatif a l'application des surfaces les unes sur les
autres. Mem. prds. par div. sav. 27 (I882), Nr. 6; it was written in I859.
(39) Some of these papers are E. BELTRAMI: Ricerche di analisi applicata alla
geometria, Giorn. di mat. 2 (1864), 3 (I865); Sulla teoria generale delle superficie,
Atti Ist. Veneto (2I5 (I86o); Delle variabili complesse sopra una superficie
qualunque, Ann. di Mat. (2) i (1867); Teoria fondamentale degli spazi di cur-
vatura constante, Ann. di Mat. (2) 2 (I868-69); Saggio di interpretazione della
geometria non-euclidea, Giorn. di Mat. 4 (I868). All these papers in his
Opere," I, II.
(40) L. SCHLAFLI, Nota alla memoria del sig. BELTRAMI. Ann. di mat. (2)
5 (i87I-73), P. 178-I93.
(42) See the discussion by E. SALKOWSKI. Encykl. d. math. Wiss. III, 3, p. 541I.
See for the work done in Fiance J. BERTRAND. Rapport sur les progrbs les plus
recents de l'analyse mathematique. Paris, I867.
(44) See the discussion by H. LIEBMANN, Encykl. d. math. Wiss., III, 3, p. 503.
Ii. - Sources.
I3