Bacteria Classification Using Image Processing and Deep Learning
Bacteria Classification Using Image Processing and Deep Learning
1
2.4 Research Methodology
2
Figure 3 (a) (b) (c) (d) show examples of bacteria 5. Conclusion
detection output and the output can detect type of
bacteria and inform the percentage of possibility The experimental results have confirmed that two
bacteria prediction. species of bacteria in different cell shape,
Figures 1-3, the results have confirmed that the Staphylococcus aureus (spherical or round shaped)
training method Training accuracy and validation and Lactobacillus delbrueckii (long-rod shaped) are
accuracy have reached more than 75 percent by more able to automatically predict using machine learning
training times of 4 Epoch both of high-resolution and by image classification and deep learning method.
standard resolution bacteria image. The experimental results compare results using
existing research dataset and own prepared dataset for
4. Comparison of Experimental Results accuracy in bacteria prediction use case.
and Discussion Training accuracy and validation accuracy has
reached more than 75 percent by more training times
of 4 Epochs both of high-resolution and standard
Moreover, the trend of improvement for better resolution bacteria image.
accuracy could be investigated by implementing more Accordingly, this research also tries to modify
numbers of Epoch and activation function variables LeNET methodology and observe the trend to make
choosing. more training with greater number of Epochs. The
results have confirmed that standard resolution
bacteria images datasets could be improve more
accuracy in future. It can be more apply another CNN
methodology for comparison such as ResNET,
AlexNET and etc.
However, this first study is limited to only two
species of bacteria in different cell shape. We will
propose more than two genera of bacteria and improve
the accuracy for using with mobile and tablet use
cases in future.
5. Acknowledgement
Figure 4 Training Loss and Accuracy in 10 Epochs This research also was financial supported by
with Sigmoid Activation Function KMITL Research and Innovation Service (KRIS).
References
[1] K. Lim, S. Hyun Park, et al., Cell image processing
methods for automatic cell pattern recognition and
morphological analysis of mesenchymal stem cells –
An algorithm for cell classification and adaptive
brightness correction, J. of Biosystems Eng, 38(1), pp.
55-632013, February 2013.
[2] L. Shamir, J. D. Delaney, et al., Pattern recognition
software and techniques for biological image analysis,
Figure 5 Training Loss and Accuracy in 10 Epochs Plos computational biology, 6(11), November 2010.
with Softmax Activation Function [3] Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner.
Gradient-based learning applied to document
The results of Figures 4 and 5 confirmed that when recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, November
applying more numbers of epochs, Training Loss and 1998.
Accuracy would be better. Training Loss and [4] B. Zielinski, A. Plichta, et al., Deep learning
Accuracy in 10 Epochs with Softmax Activation approach to bacterial colony classification, Plos one,
Function methodology is better than Sigmoid 12(9), September 2017.
Activation Function, which reached 96% of validation
accuracy.