Man Sues Shinola Hotel For Alleged Racial Discrimination
Man Sues Shinola Hotel For Alleged Racial Discrimination
Man Sues Shinola Hotel For Alleged Racial Discrimination
DWIGHT JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 24- -CD
Honorable
-V-
SHINOLA HOTEL,
Defendant.
COMPLAINT
NOW COMES the above-named Plaintiff, by and through his attorneys, MARKO
LAW, PLLC, and for his Complaint against the above-named Defendant, states as follows:
1
2. Defendant Shinola Hotel is a domestic limited liability company located and
3. The transactions and occurrences giving rise to this action took place in the County
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
5. Jackson, by reference, incorporates the preceding paragraphs of this Complaint as
8. Jackson was not contacted by Defendant to undergo the interview process for the
9. Jackson applied to Defendant twice for similar positions under a more readily
apparent Caucasian name, under the alias “John Jebrowski,” using the exact resume, in
which he was contacted by Defendant to undergo the interviewing process the same week.
10. Jackson established that the Defendant’s consideration of candidates was based on
11. Shortly after Jackson underwent the interview process, he was informed that he was
2
12. Upon information and belief, Jackson’s applications were disregarded by Defendant
13. Jackson has suffered and continues to suffer emotional distress as a result of the
position.
14. As a result of Defendant’s actions and inactions, Jackson has suffered and will
continue to suffer extensive damages, including but not limited to the following:
a. Stress;
b. Humiliation;
c. Emotional Damages;
d. Non-economic Damages;
e. Exemplary Damages;
f. Economic Damages; and
g. All other injuries to be discovered throughout discovery.
16. At all material times, Plaintiff was an applicant, and Defendants were his desired
employer, covered by and within the meaning of the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights
17. Plaintiff as an African American, is part of a protected class under the Michigan
3
18. Due to Plaintiff’s race, he was denied an employment opportunity with Defendant.
19. Defendants, through its agents, representatives, and employees, were predisposed
to discrimination on the basis of race and acted in accordance with that predisposition.
20. Defendants, through its agents, representatives, and employees, treated Plaintiff
differently from similarly situated applicants in the terms and conditions of employment
sensibilities.
22. Defendants are vicariously liable for the violation of Plaintiff’s Rights under the
Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act pursuant to the doctrine of respondeat superior.
23. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful actions, Plaintiff has
24. Plaintiff, by reference, incorporates the preceding paragraphs as though fully set
forth herein.
25. Defendant retaliated against Plaintiff for applying to Shinola Hotel, opposing the
unlawful hiring practices, and complaining to Shinola Hotel about such practices,
4
26. In response to Plaintiff’s participation in these protected activities, Plaintiff was
punished without justification by Defendant, including, but not limited to, denying
course of litigation.
27. Defendant’s actions were willful, intentional, and/or made in reckless disregard of
28. Defendant’s actions were a direct and proximate result of Plaintiff’s injuries.
denied employment.
29. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s actions, Plaintiff has suffered and
judgment against Defendants in such an amount as the trier of fact shall deem fair and
just, together with interest, costs and attorney fees, and for such other and further relief
5
Respectfully submitted,
PROOF OF SERVICE
The Undersigned certifies that the forgoing instrument was served upon all parties to the above cause to
each of the attorneys of record herein at their respective addresses disclosed on the pleadings on July 3,
2024
US Mail Fax
Hand Delivered Overnight Carrier
Certified Mail E-File/E-Mail