Scribd
Upload
6 views

Assignment 3-Reflection On Learning Effectiveness

Learning effectiveness

Uploaded by

Aisha Sharif
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views

Assignment 3-Reflection On Learning Effectiveness

Learning effectiveness

Uploaded by

Aisha Sharif
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG

FACULTY OF EDUCATION
PGDE

EDUC7155 Assignment 3 - Reflection on Learning Effectiveness


(individual)

Task:
Each student should submit a project reflection based on the mini-course co-developed with
their team members and the comments they received during the microteaching. In the project
reflection, students are expected to focus on 2 to 3 areas of learning design, discuss the
learning theories underpinning its design, and elaborate on how to improve the design with
concrete suggestions. The rubric below provides the criteria and standards for assessing the
individual project report.

Evaluation Criteria:
The assignment will be assessed according to the following:
 Formulation of assignment and Originality
 Literature and Concepts
 Application, Analysis, Argument, and Critique
 Design and Presentation, Language use, And Referencing

Word Length:
● 1,500 words written report

Assignment Submission:
Your assignments should be submitted to Turnitin in the HKU Moodle platform, and the
hardcopy is NOT required.

Example: Wong Nga Lun_Reflection on Learning Effectiveness.docx


Rubric
CRITERION DESCRIPTION FOR THE VARIOUS GRADES FOR DIFFERENT GRADING ASPECTS
Aspect Excellent Good Satisfactory Pass Fail
Formulation Excellent Good formulation Satisfactory Weak formulation Unsatisfactory
of assignment formulation of of formulation of of formulation of the
and Assignment Assignment assignment Assignment assignment topic
Originality
Excellent Good Satisfactory Limited Limited
understanding, understanding and understanding and understanding of understanding of
and comprehensive appropriate comprehension and topic topic
consideration of consideration of of
topic topic topic
Highly original Original Average originality Weak originality Not original
(20%) (15%) (10%) (5%) (no point)
Literature and Excellent Good organization Satisfactory Weak Poor organization
Concepts organization and organization and organization and and Coverage
and comprehensive good coverage coverage Coverage
coverage

Critically appraised Some critical Average appraisal of Limited literature Unacceptable


literature review appraisal the appraisal and appraisal
of the literature Literature review and literature
review
Highly relevant Above average Average relevance Few items of Irrelevant
Relevance relevance
Sound conceptual Above average Average conceptual Weak conceptual Lacking or
framework conceptual framework framework irrelevant
framework conceptual
framework
(20%) (15%) (10%) (5%) (no point)
Application, Excellent Above average Average application Weak application Inadequate or
Analysis, application of application of of of inappropriate
Argument, Concepts concepts Concepts Concepts application of
and concepts
Critique
Excellent analysis Above average Average analysis Weak analysis Inadequate
and analysis and and Discussion analysis and
Discussion and good Discussion poor discussion
discussion

Accurate, complete Above average Satisfactory Weak Inadequate


conclusions conclusions conclusions conclusions conclusions
demonstrating good demonstrating self- demonstrating some demonstrating and self-reflection
self-reflection reflection self-reflection limited
self-reflection

Demonstrates Demonstrates good Demonstrates some Demonstrates Lack of any critical


excellent ability to ability to make ability to make little critical or
make critical critical point critical awareness appreciative points
points points
(30%) (25%) (10%) (5%) (no point)
Design and Excellent structure, Good structure, Average structure, Weak structure, Unstructured,
Presentation, presentation and presentation and presentation and presentation and inadequately
Language language use and language use, with language use with language use presented,
use, And few few some with proof- unacceptable
Referencing proof-reading errors proof-reading proof-reading errors reading errors proof-reading
errors errors

Excellent Generally good and Generally consistent Some attempt at Little or no attempt
referencing which appropriate, referencing consistent at consistent
follows consistent consistent referencing referencing
conventions referencing
(30%) (25%) (10%) (5%) (no point)

You might also like