Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

OPEN ACCESS
Computer Science & IT Research Journal
P-ISSN: 2709-0043, E-ISSN: 2709-0051
Volume 5, Issue 1, P.190-218, January 2024
DOI: 10.51594/csitrj.v5i.717
Fair East Publishers
Journal Homepage: www.fepbl.com/index.php/csitrj

COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF AGILE METHODOLOGIES IN

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Emmanuel Chibuike Daraojimba1, Chinedu Nnamdi Nwasike2, Abimbola Oluwatoyin Adegbite3,

Chinedu Alex Ezeigweneme4, & Joachim Osheyor Gidiagba5
1
University of Pretoria, South Africa.
2
High Auto Maintenance Services, Port-Harcourt, Nigeria.
3
IHS Towers Nigeria Plc, Nigeria.
4
MTN Nigeria.
5
University of Johannesburg, South Africa.
_______________________________________________________________________________
*Corresponding Author: Joachim Osheyor Gidiagba
Corresponding Author Email: [email protected]
Article Received: 15-11-23 Accepted: 20-12-23 Published: 13-01-24

Licensing Details: Author retains the right of this article. The article is distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License
(http://www.creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction
and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified
on the Journal open access page
_______________________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT
This comprehensive review paper delves into the application and impact of Agile methodologies in
the realm of project management. Agile methodologies, initially rooted in software development,
have gained widespread acceptance across various industries due to their flexibility, adaptability,
and customer-centric approach. The primary objective of this review is to synthesize the current
body of knowledge on Agile methodologies, highlighting their evolution, principles, and diverse
applications in project management. The methodology of this review involves a systematic
analysis of existing literature, encompassing peer-reviewed journals, industry reports, and case

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 190

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

studies. This approach ensures a holistic understanding of Agile methodologies, encompassing

both theoretical frameworks and practical implementations. The review categorizes Agile
methodologies, such as Scrum, Kanban, and Lean, and examines their unique features and contexts
of application. Key findings indicate that agile methodologies significantly enhance project
performance, particularly in dynamic and uncertain environments. They foster greater
collaboration, continuous improvement, and customer satisfaction. However, challenges such as
resistance to change, lack of skilled personnel, and difficulties in scaling Agile practices are also
identified. The review concludes that while Agile methodologies offer substantial benefits in
project management, their successful implementation requires a cultural shift within organizations,
adequate training, and a nuanced understanding of when and how to apply these methodologies.
Future research directions include exploring the integration of Agile with traditional project
management approaches and its impact on organizational performance in various sectors.
Keywords: Agile Methodologies, Project Management, Industry Adaptation, Scalability,
Technological Advancements, Global Economic Shifts, Artificial Intelligence (AI).
_______________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
Background of Agile Methodologies
Agile methodologies have revolutionized the landscape of project management, offering a
dynamic and flexible approach that contrasts sharply with traditional, more rigid methods.
Originating in the software development industry, Agile methodologies have since permeated
various sectors, driven by their promise of enhanced efficiency, adaptability, and customer
satisfaction.
The inception of Agile methodologies can be traced back to the challenges faced in software
development projects, where traditional models like the Waterfall approach often proved
inadequate in addressing rapidly changing requirements and customer needs (Halani & Jhajharia,
2021). Agile methodologies emerged as a response to these challenges, emphasizing iterative
development, continuous feedback, and cross-functional team collaboration.
Central to the Agile philosophy is the Agile Manifesto, a declaration of four fundamental values
and twelve principles that guide Agile project management. These values prioritize individuals and
interactions over processes and tools, working software over comprehensive documentation,
customer collaboration over contract negotiation, and responding to change over following a plan.
Agile methodologies, such as Scrum, Kanban, and Extreme Programming, have been widely
adopted due to their flexibility and focus on delivering tangible results in short iterations, known as
sprints. Scrum, for instance, is characterized by roles like the Scrum Master and Product Owner,
and practices such as daily stand-up meetings and sprint reviews, which facilitate continuous
improvement and adaptability (Berbegal-Mirabent, Gil-Doménech, & Berbegal-Mirabent, 2017).
Despite their widespread popularity, Agile methodologies are not without challenges. The
transition from traditional to Agile methods can be complex, requiring a cultural shift within
organizations and a redefinition of roles and processes. Additionally, the scalability of Agile

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 191

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

practices in large, distributed teams remains a subject of ongoing research and debate (Iqbal et al.,
2021).
In summary, Agile methodologies represent a significant shift in project management, offering a
more responsive and customer-centric approach. Their evolution from software development to
broader applications underscores their versatility and effectiveness in today's fast-paced and
complex project environments.
Overview of the Evolution and Principles of Agile Methodologies in Project Management.
The evolution of Agile methodologies in project management marks a paradigm shift from
traditional, plan-driven approaches to a more flexible, iterative process. This introduction provides
an overview of the evolution and principles of Agile methodologies, tracing their origins,
development, and the core principles that underpin their application in project management.
Agile methodologies emerged in the early 2000s, primarily as a response to the limitations of the
Waterfall model in software development. The Waterfall model, characterized by its linear and
sequential approach, often led to significant challenges in adapting to changing requirements and
customer needs (Halani & Jhajharia, 2021). Agile methodologies were conceptualized to address
these challenges, emphasizing adaptability, customer collaboration, and iterative progress.
The formal inception of Agile methodologies can be dated to the publication of the Agile
Manifesto in 2001. This manifesto, crafted by a group of software developers, articulated the core
values and principles that define Agile methodologies. The manifesto prioritizes individuals and
interactions over processes and tools, working software over comprehensive documentation,
customer collaboration over contract negotiation, and responding to change over following a plan.
These values highlight the shift towards a more human-centric and adaptive approach in project
management.
Agile methodologies encompass various frameworks and practices, with Scrum, Kanban, and
Extreme Programming being among the most prominent. Scrum, for instance, is a framework that
organizes work in short, time-boxed iterations known as sprints, with regular reviews and
adaptations of plans (Berbegal-Mirabent, Gil-Doménech, & Berbegal-Mirabent, 2017). Kanban, on
the other hand, focuses on visualizing work, limiting work in progress, and optimizing the flow of
tasks. Extreme Programming emphasizes technical excellence, customer satisfaction, and
continuous development.
The principles of Agile methodologies revolve around several key themes. First is the emphasis on
customer satisfaction through early and continuous delivery of valuable software or products.
Agile methodologies advocate for welcoming changing requirements, even late in development, as
a means to enhance customer competitiveness (Iqbal et al., 2021). Another principle is the delivery
of working products or software frequently, with a preference for shorter timescales.
Collaboration is a cornerstone of Agile methodologies. Projects are built around motivated
individuals who should be given the environment and support they need and trusted to get the job
done. Face-to-face conversation is viewed as the most efficient and effective method of conveying
information within a development team.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 192

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Agile processes promote sustainable development. The sponsors, developers, and users should be
able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely. Continuous attention to technical excellence and
good design enhances agility. Simplicity—the art of maximizing the amount of work not done—is
essential.
The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams. At regular
intervals, the team reflects on how to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its behavior
accordingly.
Despite its numerous advantages, Agile methodologies are not without challenges. Implementing
Agile requires a significant cultural shift within organizations, necessitating changes in mindset,
processes, and roles. The scalability of Agile practices, particularly in large, distributed teams,
remains a topic of ongoing research and discussion (Iqbal et al., 2021).
Agile methodologies represent a significant evolution in project management, offering a flexible,
iterative, and collaborative approach. Their principles and practices continue to influence and
shape the field of project management, adapting to the complexities and dynamics of modern
project environments.
Significance of Agile in Modern Project Management
The significance of Agile methodologies in modern project management cannot be overstated. In
the contemporary business landscape, characterized by rapid technological advancements and
ever-evolving market demands, Agile methodologies have emerged as a critical tool for ensuring
project success and organizational agility.
Agile methodologies, with their roots in the software development industry, have transcended their
initial domain to become a vital component of project management across various sectors. This
widespread adoption is primarily due to Agile's ability to accommodate change, promote
collaboration, and deliver value incrementally and efficiently (Vučeković & Avlijaš, 2020).
One of the key aspects of Agile's significance is its high success rate compared to traditional
project management approaches. Studies have consistently shown that projects implementing
Agile methodologies tend to have higher success rates, with reduced instances of failure or
cancellation (Vučeković & Avlijaš, 2020). This success is attributed to Agile's iterative approach,
which allows for continuous feedback and adaptation, thereby reducing risks and increasing the
likelihood of meeting project objectives.
Agile methodologies are particularly renowned for their flexibility and adaptability to changing
requirements. Unlike rigid traditional methods, Agile embraces change, allowing projects to pivot
and adjust to new information or shifting market conditions. This adaptability is crucial in today's
fast-paced business environment, where the ability to respond quickly to change can be a
significant competitive advantage (Zasornova, Lysenko, & Zasornov, 2022).
Moreover, Agile methodologies place a strong emphasis on customer collaboration and
satisfaction. By involving customers throughout the project lifecycle, Agile ensures that the final
product aligns closely with customer needs and expectations. This customer-centric approach not
only enhances product quality but also fosters stronger relationships between the project team and
stakeholders (Iqbal, 2019).

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 193

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

The impact of Agile methodologies extends beyond project outcomes to encompass broader
organizational benefits. Agile practices promote a culture of collaboration, transparency, and
continuous improvement. Teams working within Agile frameworks are empowered and self-
organizing, leading to higher levels of engagement and productivity (Wafa, Khan, Malik,
Abdusalomov, Cho, & Odarchenko, 2022).
However, the implementation of Agile methodologies is not without challenges. Organizations
often face hurdles in adopting Agile, including resistance to change, the need for cultural shifts,
and the requirement for ongoing training and skill development. Despite these challenges, the
benefits of Agile in enhancing project success, adaptability, and customer satisfaction make it an
indispensable tool in modern project management.
The significance of Agile methodologies in modern project management lies in their ability to
provide a flexible, adaptive, and customer-focused approach to project execution. As organizations
continue to navigate an increasingly complex and dynamic business environment, Agile
methodologies offer a robust framework for managing projects effectively and efficiently.
Discussion on the Growing Importance and Adoption of Agile Methodologies in various
Industries.
The growing importance and widespread adoption of Agile methodologies across various
industries mark a significant shift in project management practices. Initially confined to the realm
of software development, Agile has now permeated diverse sectors, demonstrating its versatility
and effectiveness in managing projects in a rapidly changing environment.
Agile methodologies, characterized by their iterative, collaborative, and flexible approach, have
become increasingly relevant in today's fast-paced business world. This relevance is driven by the
need for organizations to respond swiftly to market changes, technological advancements, and
evolving customer demands. Agile's emphasis on adaptability, continuous improvement, and
stakeholder involvement aligns well with these contemporary business challenges.
In the construction industry, for example, the adoption of Agile methodologies has been identified
as a potential solution to improve project outcomes. Traditional project management approaches in
construction often face challenges related to cost overruns, schedule delays, and quality issues.
Agile methodologies, with their focus on iterative development and stakeholder collaboration,
offer a promising alternative to address these challenges. A study by Chathuranga,
Wickramarachchi, and Jayasinghe (2023) highlights the factors driving the adoption of Agile in
construction, including absorptive capacity, employee involvement, and organizational culture.
The software industry, where Agile originated, continues to evolve with the adoption of Agile
practices. In entrepreneur companies, particularly those experiencing growth, Agile methodologies
facilitate scalability while maintaining agility. Le's research (n.d.) on Agile practices adoption in
growing entrepreneur companies emphasizes the importance of customer focus, forming small
Agile teams, and empowering team members to adapt to changing requirements.
In the Pakistani software industry, the adoption of Agile practices has been studied to address the
challenges faced by small and medium-sized enterprises. Aziz, Saeed, and Alsmadi (2016)

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 194

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

explored the correlation between Agile practice adoption and project management processes in this
context, developing a web-based tool to support Agile methodologies.
Furthermore, the IT industry has seen a significant shift towards Agile methodologies to enhance
project performance. A study by Rajan and Santhosh (n.d.) investigated the influence of Agile
methodology on IT project performance in India. Their findings indicate that Agile methodologies,
particularly the Scrum framework, significantly improve project quality and business value.
The adoption of Agile methodologies across various industries underscores their growing
importance in modern project management. Agile's ability to accommodate rapid changes, foster
collaboration, and focus on delivering customer value makes it an essential tool for organizations
seeking to thrive in today's dynamic business environment.
Purpose of the Review
The purpose of this comprehensive review is to critically examine the evolution, application, and
impact of Agile methodologies in the field of project management. Agile methodologies have
become a cornerstone in modern project management, offering a flexible and dynamic approach to
managing projects in various industries. This review aims to synthesize existing literature,
providing a holistic understanding of Agile methodologies and their significance in contemporary
project management practices.
The review seeks to explore the origins and evolution of Agile methodologies, tracing their
journey from software development to broader industry applications. This historical perspective is
crucial for understanding the foundational principles of Agile and how they have adapted to meet
the needs of different project environments (Rodgi & Bhirud, n.d.). By examining the evolution of
Agile, the review will highlight the factors that have contributed to its widespread adoption and
continued relevance in project management. Another key objective of this review is to compare
Agile methodologies with traditional project management approaches, such as the Waterfall
model. This comparison will provide insights into the strengths and limitations of Agile
methodologies, offering a nuanced understanding of their suitability for different types of projects
(Mali, Patil, & Dhanvijay, 2022). The review will delve into the specific characteristics of Agile
methodologies, such as Scrum, Kanban, and Lean, and assess their impact on project outcomes,
including efficiency, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction.
The review also aims to address the practical aspects of implementing Agile methodologies in
various industries. It will explore the challenges and best practices associated with Agile adoption,
drawing on case studies and empirical research. This aspect of the review will be particularly
valuable for practitioners and organizations considering or currently implementing Agile
methodologies in their projects (Alves, Tereso, & Cruz, 2020).
Furthermore, the review will investigate the future sustainability of Agile methodologies in project
management. As the business landscape continues to evolve with digital transformation and
changing market demands, it is imperative to assess the long-term viability of Agile
methodologies. The review will explore how Agile can be integrated with traditional project
management practices to create hybrid models that cater to the needs of future projects (Leong et
al., 2023).

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 195

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

In summary, the purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive and critical analysis of Agile
methodologies in project management. By examining their evolution, comparing them with
traditional methods, exploring practical implementation challenges, and assessing their future
sustainability, this review aims to contribute valuable insights to both academic and professional
audiences in the field of project management.
Defining the Scope and Objectives of the Review.
The scope and objectives of this comprehensive review are to provide an in-depth analysis of Agile
methodologies within the context of project management. This review aims to explore the
multifaceted aspects of Agile methodologies, their evolution, implementation challenges, and
impact across various industries. By doing so, it seeks to offer a thorough understanding of Agile
methodologies, contributing to both academic knowledge and practical applications in project
management.
Scope of the Review:
1. Historical Evolution of Agile Methodologies: Tracing the origins and development of Agile
methodologies, particularly from their roots in software development to their application in diverse
fields. This historical perspective is essential to understand the foundational principles and the
evolution of Agile methodologies over time (Rodgi & Bhirud, n.d.).
2. Comparative Analysis with Traditional Methodologies: Examining how Agile
methodologies differ from traditional project management approaches, such as the Waterfall
model. This comparison will highlight the unique features of Agile methodologies and their
suitability for various project types (Janahi, 2018).
3. Implementation in Diverse Industries: Investigating the adoption and adaptation of Agile
methodologies in different industries beyond IT, such as construction, banking, and others. This
will provide insights into the versatility and applicability of Agile methodologies in various project
environments (Debebe, 2019).
4. Challenges and Best Practices: Exploring the challenges faced in implementing Agile
methodologies and identifying best practices for successful adoption. This includes examining
organizational culture, team dynamics, and project complexity (Rodrigues & Rabetti, 2021).
The primary objectives of this review are:
1. To Synthesize Existing Literature: Collating and synthesizing existing research and literature
on Agile methodologies to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic.
2. Identify Trends and Patterns: Analyzing trends and patterns in the application of Agile
methodologies across different industries and project types.
3. To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Agile Methodologies: Assessing the effectiveness of Agile
methodologies in project management, including their impact on project outcomes, efficiency, and
stakeholder satisfaction.
4. To Provide Practical Insights: Offering practical insights and recommendations for
organizations and practitioners considering or currently implementing Agile methodologies in their
projects.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 196

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

5. To Suggest Areas for Future Research: Identifying gaps in the current literature and
suggesting areas for future research in Agile methodologies within the field of project
management.
In summary, this review aims to provide a detailed and comprehensive examination of Agile
methodologies in project management. By exploring their historical evolution, comparing them
with traditional methods, and investigating their implementation across various industries, this
review seeks to offer valuable insights and contribute to the ongoing discourse in the field of
project management.
Methodology: Detailed explanation of the systematic approach for the literature review,
including data sources, search strategies, and selection criteria.
The methodology of this comprehensive review is designed to systematically explore and
synthesize the existing literature on Agile methodologies in project management. This section
outlines the systematic approach, including data sources, search strategies, and selection criteria,
ensuring a rigorous and transparent review process.
The review primarily utilized academic databases and digital libraries to source relevant literature.
Key databases included PubMed, Google Scholar, and specialized databases focusing on
management and information technology. Grey literature, such as industry reports and conference
proceedings, was also considered to capture a broader range of insights and practical applications
of Agile methodologies (Godin et al., 2015).
A structured search strategy was employed to ensure comprehensive coverage of the topic. This
involved using a combination of keywords and phrases related to Agile methodologies and project
management. The search terms included "Agile methodologies," "project management," "Scrum,"
"Kanban," "Lean," and "Agile implementation." Boolean operators (AND, OR) were used to
combine these terms effectively. The search was tailored to each database to conform to its
specific indexing and search features.
Selection Criteria
1. The selection of studies followed predefined criteria to ensure relevance and quality. Inclusion
criteria were:
2. Peer-reviewed articles and grey literature published from 2000 onwards, reflecting the
contemporary context of Agile methodologies.
3. Studies focusing on the application, challenges, and outcomes of Agile methodologies in project
management.
Articles providing comparative analyses of Agile and traditional project management
methodologies.
Exclusion criteria included:
1. Non-English language publications.
2. Studies with a primary focus outside the scope of project management.
3. Articles that did not provide empirical evidence or substantial theoretical insights into Agile
methodologies.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 197

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

To ensure the credibility and relevance of the included studies, a quality assessment was
conducted. This involved evaluating the methodological rigor, the clarity of reporting, the
relevance to the review’s objectives, and the overall contribution to the field of project
management. Studies that did not meet the minimum quality criteria were excluded from the
review.
Data extraction involved summarizing key information from each selected study, including
objectives, methodologies, findings, and conclusions. This process was conducted systematically
to ensure consistency and comprehensiveness. The synthesis of data aimed to identify common
themes, patterns, and divergences in the literature, providing a nuanced understanding of Agile
methodologies in project management.
This systematic approach to the literature review ensures a comprehensive and unbiased
exploration of Agile methodologies in project management. By adhering to rigorous
methodological standards, this review aims to provide valuable insights and contribute
significantly to the field of project management.
Literature Review
Agile Methodologies and Frameworks
Agile methodologies have revolutionized project management by introducing a flexible and
iterative approach that is adaptable to various industries. Originating in software development,
these methodologies are characterized by their emphasis on flexibility, collaboration, customer
satisfaction, and iterative progress. Among the most prominent Agile methodologies are Scrum,
Kanban, and Extreme Programming (XP), each with its unique features and applications.
Scrum, widely recognized for its effectiveness in managing complex projects, operates on short,
time-boxed periods known as sprints. The framework includes roles such as the Scrum Master,
Product Owner, and Development Team, each playing a crucial part in the project's progress. The
Scrum Master facilitates the process, the Product Owner represents stakeholders' interests, and the
Development Team focuses on delivering product increments. This framework's adaptability
makes it suitable for projects with evolving requirements (Kalyani & Mehta, 2019).
Kanban, in contrast to Scrum, emphasizes continuous delivery without prescribing time-boxed
iterations. It uses a visual board to track workflow and tasks, making it ideal for environments with
frequently changing work requirements. Extreme Programming (XP) focuses on engineering
practices and customer satisfaction, with practices like pair programming, test-driven development,
and continuous integration, aiming to improve software quality and responsiveness to customer
needs.
The Agile Project Management Framework (APMF) integrates Agile practices into the broader
context of project management. It offers a more adaptable approach compared to traditional
methodologies, proving useful in projects requiring flexibility and quick responses to change (Sadi
& Ramsin, 2009).
In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards hybrid approaches that combine Agile
methodologies with traditional project management practices. This approach aims to leverage the

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 198

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

strengths of both methodologies, providing a balanced framework for managing various types of
projects.
Agile methodologies have also found applications beyond the IT industry, such as in construction,
healthcare, and e-government projects. For example, in e-government projects, Agile frameworks
have been adapted to accommodate rapid changes in requirements and resources, demonstrating
their versatility and effectiveness in different project environments (Raslan & El-licy, n.d.).
Agile methodologies and frameworks offer a dynamic and responsive approach to project
management. Their adaptability across different industries highlights their effectiveness in
managing projects that require rapid adaptation to change and close collaboration with
stakeholders.
Exploration of Various Agile Methodologies such as Scrum, Kanban, Lean, and others.
Agile methodologies have become a cornerstone in the field of project management, offering a
range of flexible and iterative approaches that cater to the dynamic needs of various industries.
This literature review explores several Agile methodologies, including Scrum, Kanban, and Lean,
each distinguished by its unique characteristics and applications in project management.
Scrum is a widely adopted Agile framework known for its structured yet flexible approach. It
operates on the principle of sprints, short, time-boxed periods where teams collaborate to complete
a set amount of work. The framework includes roles such as the Scrum Master, who facilitates the
process, the Product Owner, representing stakeholders, and the Development Team, focused on
delivering product increments. Scrum's adaptability makes it particularly effective in projects with
evolving requirements, allowing for rapid adaptation and iterative development (Zasornova,
Lysenko, & Zasornov, 2022).
In contrast, Kanban emphasizes continuous delivery and flow, utilizing a visual board to track
workflow and tasks. This approach is ideal for environments with frequently changing
requirements, as it helps teams manage tasks efficiently and adapt quickly to changing priorities
(Ganebnykh, Fokina, & Lukinov, n.d.).
Lean methodology, originally from manufacturing, focuses on maximizing value while minimizing
waste. It emphasizes efficiency and continuous improvement and is often integrated with Agile
principles to enhance project management processes, especially in large manufacturing enterprises
(Ganebnykh, Fokina, & Lukinov, n.d.).
The integration and adaptation of Agile methodologies in various industries have been a subject of
recent studies. For example, combining Scrum and Kanban methodologies has been explored to
create more flexible and adaptable project management models. This integration aims to combine
the best aspects of these methodologies, enhancing their applicability in different project contexts
(Popova, 2019).
A comparative analysis of Agile methodologies, particularly Scrum and Kanban, has been
conducted to understand their impact on a company's financial performance and project outcomes.
This analysis sheds light on the key differences between these methodologies and their suitability
for different types of IT projects. It also explores the requirements for forming an Agile team and
the primary stages in implementing IT projects using these methodologies (Orlov et al., 2021).

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 199

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

In summary, Agile methodologies such as Scrum, Kanban, and Lean offer diverse approaches to
project management. Their adaptability, collaboration, customer satisfaction, and iterative progress
make them suitable for a wide range of projects in various industries.
Comparative Analysis of Agile vs. Traditional Methodologies
In the evolving landscape of project management, the comparative analysis between Agile and
traditional methodologies has garnered significant attention. This literature review aims to dissect
the differences, advantages, and applicability of these methodologies in various project
environments.
Agile methodologies, characterized by their flexibility and iterative nature, have become
increasingly popular in software development and other dynamic industries. Agile approaches,
such as Scrum, Extreme Programming, and Kanban, focus on customer collaboration, adaptability
to change, and delivering functional increments rapidly and efficiently. These methodologies are
particularly effective in environments where requirements are unclear or subject to change (Gray,
Baker, Simmonds, & Cummings, 2018).
In contrast, traditional methodologies, often exemplified by the Waterfall model, follow a linear
and sequential approach. This model is characterized by distinct phases such as requirements
definition, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Traditional methodologies are
typically employed in projects where requirements are well-defined and unlikely to change
significantly over time. They offer the advantage of a structured approach, making it easier to
measure progress and coordinate large teams (Aitken & Ilango, 2013).
The comparative analysis of Agile and traditional methodologies reveals several key differences.
Agile methodologies are more adaptive, allowing for frequent reassessment and adjustments
throughout the project lifecycle. This flexibility can lead to higher customer satisfaction as the
final product is more likely to meet the evolving needs of the stakeholders. Agile also promotes a
high level of collaboration and cross-functionality within teams, which can enhance innovation and
efficiency (Souza, 2013).
However, Agile methodologies require a cultural shift in the organization, emphasizing
collaboration, openness to change, and a less hierarchical structure. This can be challenging to
implement in organizations accustomed to traditional, top-down approaches.
Traditional methodologies, while less flexible, provide a clear, structured framework that can be
advantageous in certain project contexts. They are often preferred in industries like construction or
manufacturing, where changes can be costly, and requirements are less likely to fluctuate.
Traditional methodologies also offer more straightforward project planning and control, making
them suitable for projects with a well-defined scope and deliverables (Zavyalova, Sokolov, &
Lisovskaya, 2020).
Both Agile and traditional methodologies have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice
between them should be based on the specific requirements, context, and goals of the project.
While Agile methodologies offer greater flexibility and adaptability, traditional methodologies
provide a structured approach that can be beneficial in more predictable environments.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 200

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Analysis of the differences, advantages, and limitations of agile methodologies compared to

traditional project management approaches.
In the field of project management, the comparison between Agile methodologies and traditional
approaches has been a topic of considerable interest. This literature review aims to analyze the
differences, advantages, and limitations of Agile methodologies in contrast to traditional project
management approaches.
Agile methodologies, such as Scrum, Kanban, and Extreme Programming, have emerged as
dynamic alternatives to traditional project management methods. These methodologies are
characterized by their flexibility, adaptability, and focus on iterative development and customer
collaboration. Agile approaches are particularly effective in environments where requirements are
unclear or subject to frequent changes. They emphasize working in small, cross-functional teams,
delivering functional increments rapidly and efficiently, and responding quickly to changing
requirements (Munteanu & Dragoș, 2021).
Traditional project management methodologies, often exemplified by the Waterfall model, follow
a more linear and sequential approach. This model is characterized by distinct phases such as
requirements definition, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Traditional
methodologies are typically employed in projects where requirements are well-defined and
unlikely to change significantly over time. They offer the advantage of a structured approach,
making it easier to measure progress and coordinate large teams (Castillo & Amaya, 2018).
The comparative analysis reveals several key differences between Agile and traditional
methodologies. Agile methodologies are more adaptive, allowing for frequent reassessment and
adjustments throughout the project lifecycle. This flexibility can lead to higher customer
satisfaction as the final product is more likely to meet the evolving needs of the stakeholders. Agile
also promotes a high level of collaboration and cross-functionality within teams, which can
enhance innovation and efficiency.
However, Agile methodologies require a cultural shift in the organization, emphasizing
collaboration, openness to change, and a less hierarchical structure. This can be challenging to
implement in organizations accustomed to traditional, top-down approaches.
Traditional methodologies, while less flexible, provide a clear, structured framework that can be
advantageous in certain project contexts. They are often preferred in industries like construction or
manufacturing, where changes can be costly, and requirements are less likely to fluctuate.
Traditional methodologies also offer more straightforward project planning and control, making
them suitable for projects with a well-defined scope and deliverables (Mazur, 2023).
Both Agile and traditional methodologies have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice
between them should be based on the specific requirements, context, and goals of the project.
While Agile methodologies offer greater flexibility and adaptability, traditional methodologies
provide a structured approach that can be beneficial in more predictable environments.
Empirical Studies on Agile Effectiveness
The effectiveness of Agile methodologies in project management has been the subject of various
empirical studies. These studies aim to evaluate the impact of Agile practices compared to

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 201

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

traditional project management approaches, focusing on aspects such as efficiency, stakeholder

satisfaction, and adaptability to changing project environments.
One significant study by Uikey and Suman (2012) proposed an Agile project management
framework incorporating users' involvement throughout the development process. This framework
includes a repository of lessons learned, documentation, and self-organizing teams. The study
collected empirical data through questionnaires from industry practitioners, highlighting the
increased efficiency and transparency of the development process when using Agile
methodologies, especially in financial software environments.
Iqbal et al. (2021) conducted an extensive survey in 52 prominent software development
companies in Pakistan to investigate the effectiveness of Agile methodologies in managing
software project management factors, including schedule, scope, risk, budget, quality, and
resources. The study revealed that Agile methodologies, such as Extreme Programming, Scrum,
Kanban, and Agile modeling, significantly contribute to successful software development. The
research also found a positive correlation between quality and other project management factors,
emphasizing the role of Agile methodologies in enhancing overall project success.
Sathe and Panse (2023) investigated the impact of project management constraints in fixed-cost
and fixed-scheduled Agile software development contracts. Using multigroup analysis (MGA) and
structural equation modeling (SEM), the study compared the effectiveness of Scrum and Kanban
methodologies. The findings suggested that Kanban is better at managing resources and has a
higher impact on the quality of deliverables than Scrum, particularly in fixed-cost Agile software
development projects.
Younus and Younis (2021) developed a conceptual model to understand the impact of Agile
project management on project performance, focusing on timeliness, cost, and quality. The study
highlighted the Agile method's capability to represent most factors effectively, presenting a model
for the effect of Agile project management on project outcomes. The research emphasized the
importance of understanding the impact of Agile methods on organizational culture and project
success.
These empirical studies collectively demonstrate that Agile methodologies offer significant
advantages in project management, particularly in terms of adaptability, stakeholder involvement,
and overall project success. However, the effectiveness of these methodologies can vary based on
the project context, organizational culture, and specific Agile practices employed.
Review of empirical research and case studies on the effectiveness and outcomes of
implementing agile methodologies in projects.
The effectiveness and outcomes of implementing Agile methodologies in projects have been
extensively studied through empirical research and case studies. This literature review examines
such studies to understand the impact of Agile practices on project management and development
processes.
A study by Alexandre, Marques, and Gonçalves explored the effectiveness of Waterfall and Agile
project management methodologies in Macau's construction industry. The research involved semi-
structured interviews and surveys with international and local project managers. The findings

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 202

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

indicated that most construction project managers still follow empirical methods without a specific
methodology but adopting traditional waterfall approaches. However, the study also revealed a
growing recognition of the need for increased project efficacy, particularly in planning, waste
minimization, and client feedback. This suggests a potential for Agile methodology
implementation in various types of projects, including hospitality development projects, with a
hybrid approach combining Waterfall and Agile methodologies (Alexandre, Marques, &
Gonçalves, n.d.).
Alves and Gonçalves conducted a study presenting an empirical framework for changes,
communication, and team restructuring through Agile adoption in the Brazilian marketplace. The
research analyzed five case studies of private companies in Brazil, employing grounded theory to
examine the relationships between Agile adoption and organizational strategies. The findings
highlighted the need for organizational structural changes to adopt Agile practices effectively,
suggesting that teams should focus on communication among stakeholders to increase Agile
adoption and create valuable knowledge within organizations (Alves & Gonçalves, 2022).
Weichbroth's study analyzed the implementation of Agile techniques and practices in hardware
development. The research, based on a single industry case study, examined the rationale behind
implementing Agile for hardware development and identified the Agile techniques, practices, and
supporting tools used. The study highlighted areas positively impacted by Agile application and
discussed the barriers to adopting Agile practices encountered. The findings are significant for
both researchers and practitioners seeking empirical evidence regarding Agile-oriented
implementations in hardware development (Weichbroth, 2022).
Ciancarini et al. conducted empirical research on customer communication challenges in
companies adopting Agile practices. The study involved interviews with representatives from 20
different companies, mainly Product Owners and Product Managers. The results indicated that
communication is a key challenge for companies, especially in the context of rapidly changing
software development environments. The study provided insights into the communication
challenges and issues arising during the Software Requirements Engineering phase, particularly in
customer communication (Ciancarini, Ergasheva, Gizzatullina, Ivanov, Masyagin, & Succi, n.d.).
These empirical studies and case analyses provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and
outcomes of Agile methodologies in various project environments. They highlight the benefits of
Agile practices, such as increased project efficacy, improved communication, and adaptability to
changing requirements, while also acknowledging the challenges and barriers to successful Agile
implementation.
AGILE IMPLEMENTATION AND PRACTICES
Best Practices in Agile Project Management: Discussion of key practices, tools, and strategies
for effective implementation of agile methodologies.
The effective implementation of Agile methodologies in project management is a multifaceted
process that involves strategic approaches, including the selection of appropriate practices, tools,
and strategies. This literature review synthesizes empirical research and case studies to identify
best practices in Agile project management.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 203

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Andreev and Malozemov (2020) emphasized the importance of selecting optimal tools and
techniques for Agile project management, particularly in industry and engineering. Their study
proposed an algorithm to aid decision-making in choosing suitable Agile tools and techniques,
considering internal requirements, risks, and organizational characteristics. This approach
underscores the necessity of a systematic adaptation of Agile methodologies to ensure successful
implementation.
In a study examining the practical results of Agile implementation in Russian software engineering
companies, Suetin et al. found that while Agile methodologies improved quality, they also led to
challenges in cost and schedule performance. This research highlights the need for a balanced
approach in Agile implementation, considering both its benefits and potential drawbacks (Suetin et
al., n.d.).
A case study by Abu Irtaymah, Shaari, and Ahmed focused on Agile project management in
finance technology projects within Libyan pioneer companies. The study demonstrated that the
application of Agile best practices positively impacted project success, emphasizing the immediate
benefits of agility and the advantages of adopting Agile methodologies (Abu Irtaymah, Shaari, &
Ahmed, n.d.).
From these studies, several key practices and strategies emerge as essential for effective Agile
implementation:
1. Systematic Tool and Technique Selection: Choosing the right tools and techniques based on
project-specific needs and organizational context is crucial for Agile success.
2. Balanced Approach to Quality, Cost, and Schedule: Agile implementation should balance
quality improvement with cost and schedule considerations to avoid potential performance
deterioration.
3. Adaptation to Organizational and Project Context: Agile methodologies should be adapted
to fit the specific context of the organization and the nature of the project, especially in industries
transitioning to Agile practices.
4. Stakeholder Involvement and Feedback: Continuous stakeholder involvement and feedback
are essential in Agile projects to ensure that the end product meets evolving customer needs and
expectations.
5. Emphasis on Communication and Collaboration: Effective communication and collaboration
within the team and with stakeholders are key to the success of Agile projects.
The effective implementation of Agile methodologies in project management requires a strategic
approach that carefully considers the selection of tools and techniques, balances various project
aspects, and adapts Agile practices to the specific organizational and project context.
Role of Leadership and Culture in Agile Transformation: Examination of the impact of
organizational culture and leadership on successful agile adoption.
The successful adoption of Agile methodologies is significantly influenced by organizational
culture and leadership. This section examines empirical research and case studies to understand
how these factors impact Agile transformation.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 204

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Krishna Prakash Jivan, Marnewick, and Joseph (2020) conducted research that highlights the
crucial role of organizational culture in adopting Agile methodologies. Their study revealed that an
organization's culture profoundly affects the adoption and utilization of Agile methodologies. If
the culture is not aligned with Agile principles and values, the organization may not fully realize
the benefits of Agile methodologies. The research compared the existing culture in the area under
investigation with cultures conducive to Agile methodologies, finding that the prevailing culture
had limited positive influence on Agile adoption. This underscores the importance of aligning
organizational culture with Agile principles for successful Agile implementation.
Wicaksana, Purwoko, and Sihite explored the role of organizational culture in enhancing
organizational agility, particularly in the context of digital transformation in a government
organization. Their findings indicated a significant and positive influence of organizational culture
on agility. Furthermore, knowledge sharing and the perception of organizational support were
found to significantly impact organizational culture. This study demonstrates the importance of
fostering a supportive and collaborative organizational culture to facilitate agility and adaptability
in changing environments.
Kim, You, and Hong examined the relationship between leadership styles, such as Servant
Leadership and Authentic Leadership, and Agile Culture. Their research found that these
leadership styles positively affected Perceived Organizational Support (POS), which in turn
significantly impacted various aspects of Agile Culture, including empowerment and collective
intelligence. This suggests that effective leadership and the perception of organizational support
play vital roles in cultivating an Agile Culture within organizations.
Çobanoğlu and Demir's study on crisis management, agile leadership, and organizational culture in
primary schools revealed a significant relationship between these variables. Agile leadership and a
strong organizational culture were found to be predictive of effective crisis management. This
highlights the need for agile leaders and a robust, continuous culture in organizations to mitigate
the negative effects of crises and foster resilience.
The adoption of Agile methodologies is heavily influenced by the organizational culture and
leadership within an organization. Aligning the organizational culture with Agile principles,
fostering an environment supportive of knowledge sharing, and employing effective leadership are
key to realizing the benefits of Agile transformation.
AGILE METHODOLOGIES IN DIFFERENT SECTORS
Application of Agile in Software Development: Specifics of agile methodologies in the
software development industry
The application of Agile methodologies in software development has been a subject of extensive
research, given its significant impact on the industry. Agile methodologies, characterized by their
flexibility, adaptability, and focus on iterative development, have transformed the way software is
developed. This section discusses the specifics of Agile methodologies in the software
development industry, drawing on empirical research and case studies.
Abrahamsson, Salo, Ronkainen, and Warsta (2017) conducted a comprehensive review of Agile
software development methodologies. Their research aimed to define and classify Agile

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 205

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

development approaches and analyze ten software development methods characterized as "Agile."
The study highlighted the growing popularity of Agile methodologies, particularly in the volatile
Internet software industry and the emerging mobile application environment. The research
underscored the need for academic research in this area, as most existing publications are by
practitioners or consultants. This study provides a foundational understanding of Agile
methodologies and their application in software development.
Bukhari and Khan conducted a comparative study on the usage of traditional and Agile software
development methodologies in the software industry of Asia. The research aimed to assist software
development professionals in selecting suitable development models for projects of various sizes,
considering factors like scope, quality, cost, time, and risk. The study concluded that for small-
scale projects, professionals preferred traditional methodologies, while for medium and large-scale
projects, Agile models were more favored. This research highlights the situational preference for
Agile methodologies in software development, depending on project size and complexity.
Kulkarni, Padmanabham, Harshe, Baseer, and Patil (2017) investigated Agile adaptation in a
software company, focusing on project management challenges and the comparison of
conventional software engineering practices with the Agile process model. The study emphasized
the evolving nature of project management and the innovative methods being added, particularly in
Agile development. The research provided insights into the current status of quality in software
projects and quality process improvement strategies, highlighting the benefits of Agile
methodologies in software development.
While not directly related to software development, a study on Agile application in the
construction industry provides valuable insights into the adaptability of Agile methodologies
across different sectors. The research explored the contrast between traditional and modern
methodologies for project management in construction projects, introducing Agile project
management as a modern methodology. The study used Agile software development tools to
analyze and evaluate solutions, comparing them with traditional project management tools. This
research underscores the versatility of Agile methodologies and their potential application beyond
software development.
Agile methodologies have significantly impacted the software development industry, offering a
flexible and iterative approach that caters to the dynamic nature of software projects. The adoption
of Agile methodologies varies based on project size, complexity, and industry, highlighting the
need for a tailored approach to Agile implementation.
Agile Beyond Software Development: Exploration of the application of agile methodologies
in non-software industries and projects.
The application of Agile methodologies, initially tailored for software development, has
transcended its original domain, finding relevance and success in various non-software industries.
This exploration delves into how Agile methodologies have been adapted and applied in different
sectors, drawing insights from empirical research and case studies.
A study by Guerrero et al. (2023) investigated the adaptation of the Scrum methodology in the
non-software industry, specifically focusing on managing a research initiative. This research

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 206

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

highlighted the challenges and necessary adaptations for implementing Scrum in contexts
significantly different from its software development origins. The study demonstrated that the
principles of flexibility, collaboration, and iterative progress inherent in Scrum could be effectively
adapted to non-software projects, leading to improved project management and outcomes.
Shakya and Shakya (2020) conducted research on the critical success factors of Agile methodology
in the software industry of Nepal, providing insights applicable to non-software industries. The
study emphasized key Agile principles such as rapid deployment of solutions, early and continuous
delivery, customer focus, and effective collaboration. These principles, while rooted in software
development, are adaptable to various project types, underscoring the versatility of Agile
methodologies across different sectors.
Pal and Karakostas addressed software testing issues in Agile software application development,
particularly under methodologies like Scrum and DevOps. While the focus was on software
testing, the principles discussed are relevant to quality assurance in non-software projects. The
emphasis on iterative development, collaboration, and quality at each stage is applicable across
various industries, suggesting that Agile methodologies can enhance project quality beyond
software development.
Žužek et al. (2020) presented a case study of a Slovenian medium-sized manufacturing company
that implemented Agile project management practices. The study found that even partial
implementation of Agile practices led to significant benefits such as improved communication,
faster detection of discrepancies, and greater flexibility. This case study demonstrates that Agile
methodologies can be effectively adopted in non-software SMEs, contributing to increased agility
and competitiveness in the global market.
In summary, Agile methodologies have proven their adaptability and effectiveness in various non-
software industries. The principles of flexibility, customer focus, and iterative progress inherent in
Agile methodologies can be tailored to suit the specific needs and challenges of different sectors,
leading to improved project management and outcomes.
CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS
Common Challenges in Adopting Agile: Identifying the most prevalent challenges faced
during agile implementation and how organizations overcome them.
Adopting Agile methodologies presents a range of challenges for organizations, which are crucial
to address for successful implementation. This section explores the common challenges faced
during Agile implementation and the strategies organizations have employed to overcome them.
Orantes-Jiménez, Pérez-Castillo, and Aguilar-Jáuregui (2022) conducted a study to identify factors
significantly related to the adoption of an Agile approach over a traditional one in software
development teams. The research involved a systematic analysis of works mentioning this
transition to extract and synthesize existing challenges. The study found that quality, complexity,
and management of iterations where work is visible to users significantly influenced the decision
to transition from traditional to Agile approaches. The findings suggest that organizations should
consider these factors during the adoption phase of any Agile methodology.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 207

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Özcan-Top, Demirörs, and McCaffery conducted a study highlighting the challenges organizations
face when implementing Agile techniques and the solutions that proved successful. The research
used the Software Agility Assessment Reference Model (AgilityMod) to perform a multiple case
study. The study described experiences from two cases that achieved high levels of agility,
detailing the challenges they faced and the solutions they found. The research also identified
unresolved challenges that require further discussion, emphasizing that the pathway to excellence
in agility often involves experiencing challenges and discovering working solutions (Özcan-Top,
Demirörs, & McCaffery, n.d.).
Potter's research discussed the challenges faced by senior management in adopting Agile practices,
especially in industries beyond IT. The study presented adoption challenges around Agile
processes, management and business support, consistency, people issues, organizational culture,
previous Agile experience, and education and training. The research identified key managerial
factors influencing Agile adoption, including management support, education and training,
expectations, and communication. These factors are crucial for executives to consider when
adopting Agile within an organization.
Ekasari, Raharjo, and Prasetyo conducted a systematic literature review to identify challenges and
proposed practices and solutions in implementing Large-Scale Agile. The study analyzed 12
papers and identified 28 challenges classified into six categories, with the biggest challenge arising
from communication and collaboration. This included issues related to team coordination,
managing autonomous teams, uneven team maturity, and distributed teams. The study provided
solutions for each challenge obtained from related studies and best practices, highlighting the
importance of effective communication and collaboration in Agile implementation.
Moravcová and Legény (2016) aimed to identify concerns and challenges in deploying Agile
practices. The study reviewed existing literature and case studies, surveyed five companies, and
interviewed 200 employees. The research identified 25 impediments to Agile adoption based on
the interviews. This study contributes to understanding the complex issue associated with Agile
adoption and improving software development processes.
Asfaw, Clemmons, Hayes, Letnaunchyn, and Rabieinejad (2022) examined the challenges of
implementing Agile processes in remote settings, focusing on the impact on communication. The
study explored the role of communication in Agile settings and sought ways to mitigate risks
imposed by remote environments on effective communication. The research also presented other
challenges companies might experience in remote Agile implementation.
The adoption of Agile methodologies involves addressing challenges related to quality,
complexity, management support, organizational culture, and communication, especially in remote
work settings. Tailored strategies and solutions are essential for overcoming these challenges and
achieving successful Agile implementation.
Scalability of Agile Practices: Discussing the scalability of agile methodologies in large and
complex projects.
The scalability of Agile methodologies in large and complex projects is a critical area of focus in
project management. Agile, originally designed for small team projects, faces unique challenges

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 208

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

when applied to larger organizational contexts. This exploration delves into how Agile
methodologies can be effectively scaled up for larger projects, drawing insights from various
studies and research.
A significant contribution to this discussion comes from a literature review conducted by Del
Wright, which informs IT leaders in large organizations about the challenges and best practices for
implementing large-scale Agile transformations. The study addresses concerns regarding
scalability and complexity when integrating Agile practices in large-scale organizations. It
suggests that while Agile has shown potential benefits for larger projects, the transition requires
careful consideration of organizational dynamics and project complexities. This implies that Agile
methodologies, though beneficial, need to be adapted to fit the larger scale and complexity of big
organizations.
Breitschuh et al. proposed an innovative approach that combines the benefits of traditional and
Agile process models, especially in complex projects. The study suggests that in overall complex
projects, only certain tasks benefit from Agile practices. The research developed a tool for
analyzing task entropy as a measure of unknowingness and thus potential for Agile approaches.
This approach aims to integrate Agile practices into traditional project management frameworks,
particularly in mechatronic product development. The implication here is that Agile methodologies
can be selectively applied to components of a project where their benefits are most pronounced,
while traditional methods can be used where they are more effective.
Rolland et al. (2023) adopted Alvesson and Sandberg's problematization approach to challenge key
assumptions prevalent in the large-scale Agile literature. Their study used a longitudinal case study
of large-scale Agile development to describe trigger events and episodes whereby the Agile
approach was tailored to address the needs of large-scale development. The research developed
new underlying assumptions suggesting that Agile and plan-driven practices are mutually enabling
and necessary for coordination and scaling in large-scale Agile projects. This study highlights the
importance of flexibility and adaptation in applying Agile methodologies to large-scale projects,
suggesting that a hybrid approach that combines Agile and traditional practices can be effective.
Gupta and Sharma explored the adaptation of Agile Software Development (ASD) in large-scale
organizations for complex projects. The paper provides insights into how Agile Software
Development has evolved to meet changing business needs and proposes new development
practices to enhance the success of large projects. The study highlights the strengths and
weaknesses of Agile in large-scale environments and suggests additional practices that large
organizations can adopt for successful development. This study underscores the need for
continuous evolution and adaptation of Agile practices to meet the demands of large and complex
projects.
Scaling Agile practices in large and complex projects requires a nuanced approach that combines
the strengths of Agile with traditional methodologies. Organizations need to adapt Agile
methodologies to fit their specific context, considering the scale and complexity of the projects.
This might involve selectively applying Agile practices, integrating them with traditional methods,
and continuously evolving these practices to meet the unique challenges of large-scale projects.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 209

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Tailored strategies, understanding of organizational dynamics, and continuous adaptation are key
to successfully scaling Agile in such environments.
FUTURE TRENDS AND DIRECTIONS
Evolving Agile Practices: Anticipating future developments and evolutions in agile
methodologies.
The evolution of Agile methodologies is a dynamic and ongoing process, with these practices
increasingly being applied in diverse sectors beyond their initial software development context.
Understanding the future developments and evolutions in Agile methodologies involves examining
their current applications and potential growth areas. This exploration draws insights from various
studies to predict future trends in Agile practices.
A significant study by Chathuranga et al. focused on the adoption of Agile project management
methodologies in the design stage of building construction projects, particularly those using
Building Information Modelling (BIM) solutions. The research identified key practices that could
drive Agile adoption in this phase, such as maintaining a backlog, running sprints, engaging a
cross-functional team, continuous integration, and iterative development of the design. This study
suggests that Agile methodologies, traditionally associated with software development, are
increasingly being adapted to other industries like construction. The design phase, facilitated by
technological advancements like BIM, presents a ripe area for Agile methodologies to bring about
efficiency and flexibility.
Bezerra, Sampaio, and Marinho's study highlighted the need to include security practices in Agile
teams, especially in the context of increasing cybersecurity concerns. Their research synthesized
literature in this domain and evaluated security policies based on Agile specialist assessment. This
underscores the growing importance of integrating security considerations into Agile
methodologies, a trend likely to gain more prominence in the future. As cybersecurity becomes a
major concern in the digital world, the integration of security practices into Agile methodologies is
becoming imperative, especially in software development, which is often exposed to security
threats.
Ahmad and Wasim conducted a comprehensive review of Agile methodology in healthcare,
exploring its manifold benefits, intricate challenges, successful case studies of implementation, and
the boundless horizon of future prospects it holds. The study indicates that Agile's adaptability,
iterative nature, and customer-centric ethos make it a transformative approach in healthcare,
reshaping medical practices for better patient outcomes and operational efficiency. This suggests a
future trend where Agile methodologies could play a significant role in healthcare management
and practices, offering a new paradigm in patient care and healthcare operations.
Munteanu and Dragoș investigated the differences between traditional project management
methodologies and Agile methodologies, particularly in financial software environments. Their
findings showed that Agile methodologies increase efficiency, transparency, and stakeholder
satisfaction in financial software development. This study points to a growing preference for Agile
methodologies over traditional ones in specific sectors like finance, indicating a future trend
towards more widespread Agile adoption in various industries.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 210

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

In summary, the future of Agile methodologies lies in their continued adaptation and application
across diverse industries. From construction and healthcare to finance, Agile practices are being
tailored to meet specific industry needs, incorporating elements like security and technology
advancements. This trend suggests a future where Agile methodologies will be integral to a wide
range of sectors, far beyond their origins in software development. The adaptability and customer-
centric nature of Agile methodologies make them suitable for various contexts, promising a future
where these practices will be commonplace in managing projects across different industries.
Integration with Other Project Management Trends: Predicting how agile might integrate
with other emerging project management trends and technologies.
The integration of Agile methodologies with emerging project management trends and
technologies is a dynamic and evolving area, reflecting the changing landscape of project
management in the modern era. As Agile practices continue to adapt, their convergence with
global trends, technological advancements, and diverse cultural contexts is shaping the future of
project management. This exploration draws insights from various studies to predict how Agile
might integrate with other emerging trends and technologies.
A study by Bushuyev et al. examined the impact of global trends on the development of
information technology and project management competencies. The research highlighted the
influence of global acceleration, digitalization, blockchain, cloud and fog technologies, and the
transition from a "rational economy" to a "behavioral economy" on Agile methodologies. The
convergence of these trends creates a new platform for the effective application of Agile
methodologies, suggesting a future where Agile practices are integrated with cutting-edge
technologies and global economic shifts. This study underscores the need for Agile methodologies
to adapt and evolve in response to changing global trends and technological advancements,
indicating a future where Agile practices are seamlessly integrated with the latest technological
innovations and economic models.
Gupta's research focused on the transformation of project management through the integration of
Artificial Intelligence (AI), data analytics, and Agile methodologies. The study established how
project management is utilizing AI-supported tools, extensive use of data analytics, and the Agile
approach for continuous improvement and consistent execution. This integration signifies a trend
where technology, particularly AI and analytics, is revolutionizing project management, enhancing
the capabilities of Agile methodologies. The study suggests that the future of Agile methodologies
will likely see a deeper integration with AI and analytics, enabling more efficient, data-driven
decision-making processes and enhancing the agility and responsiveness of project management
practices.
Vučeković and Avlijaš conducted research on the modern approach to project management, usage,
and success rate of Agile methodologies in Serbia. The study showcased the adoption level of
modern project management methodologies and their perceived importance, providing insights
into how Agile practices are being integrated into different cultural and economic contexts. This
research contributes to understanding how Agile methodologies are being adapted and applied in
various global settings, indicating a trend towards more widespread and culturally diverse

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 211

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

applications of Agile practices. The study implies that Agile methodologies are not just limited to
their traditional domains but are increasingly being adopted in different regions, adapting to local
challenges and opportunities, and becoming a global standard in project management.
Alhroub's research assessed Agile Project Management (APM) practices in Palestinian IT
companies. The study aimed to investigate the benefits of Agile project management in software
development and explored related topics to APM, including the readiness for APM
implementation, challenges, risks, and the testing of Agile principles and success factors. This
study reflects the growing trend of Agile methodologies being adopted in different regional
contexts, adapting to local challenges and opportunities. The research suggests that Agile
methodologies are increasingly being recognized as effective tools for project management in
various regional and cultural contexts, adapting to the specific needs and challenges of different
areas.
In summary, the future integration of Agile methodologies with other project management trends
and technologies is likely to be influenced by global economic shifts, technological advancements
such as AI and data analytics, and the adaptation of Agile practices in diverse cultural and
economic contexts. This trend suggests a future where Agile methodologies will be integral to a
wide range of sectors, far beyond their origins in software development, and will continue to
evolve in response to global trends and technological advancements. Agile methodologies are
expected to become more intertwined with cutting-edge technologies, offering enhanced
capabilities and efficiencies in project management across various industries and regions.
Conclusion
The exploration of Agile methodologies in the context of project management reveals a
multifaceted and dynamic landscape, characterized by continuous evolution and adaptation. Agile
methodologies, originating in the software development industry, have transcended their initial
domain, demonstrating versatility and effectiveness across various sectors. This synthesis of
findings underscores the adaptability of Agile practices, their integration with emerging trends, and
the challenges and opportunities they present in diverse project environments.
Agile methodologies have been successfully adapted in industries beyond software development,
including construction, healthcare, and finance. The principles of flexibility, collaboration, and
iterative progress inherent in Agile methodologies are being tailored to suit the specific needs and
challenges of different sectors. This adaptation is facilitated by technological advancements such
as Building Information Modelling (BIM) in construction and data analytics in healthcare,
suggesting a future where Agile practices are integral to a wide range of industries.
The scalability of Agile practices in large and complex projects requires a nuanced approach that
combines the strengths of Agile with traditional methodologies. Organizations need to adapt Agile
methodologies to fit their specific context, considering the scale and complexity of the projects.
This might involve selectively applying Agile practices, integrating them with traditional methods,
and continuously evolving these practices to meet the unique challenges of large-scale projects.
The integration of Agile methodologies with other emerging project management trends and
technologies is likely to be influenced by global economic shifts, technological advancements such

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 212

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and data analytics, and the adaptation of Agile practices in diverse
cultural and economic contexts. This trend suggests a future where Agile methodologies will
continue to evolve in response to global trends and technological advancements.
Challenges in adopting Agile methodologies include issues related to project complexity,
management support, organizational culture, and communication, especially in remote work
contexts. Tailored strategies and solutions are essential for overcoming these challenges and
achieving successful Agile implementation. The future of Agile methodologies lies in their
continued adaptation and application across diverse industries, incorporating elements like security
and technology advancements.
In conclusion, Agile methodologies have proven to be a transformative force in project
management. Their adaptability, customer-centric approach, and emphasis on iterative progress
make them suitable for a wide range of projects in various industries. The future of Agile
methodologies is likely to see deeper integration with emerging technologies and trends, enabling
more efficient, data-driven decision-making processes and enhancing the agility and
responsiveness of project management practices. As Agile methodologies continue to evolve, they
offer the potential to reshape project management practices, making them more responsive,
efficient, and aligned with the changing needs of businesses and industries worldwide. The journey
of Agile methodologies is far from over; it is evolving, adapting, and integrating with the changing
landscape of project management, promising a future where these practices are commonplace in
managing projects across different industries and regions.

References
Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2017). Agile software development
methods: Review and analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.08439.
Aitken, A., & Ilango, V. (2013, January). A comparative analysis of traditional software
engineering and agile software development. In 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference
on System Sciences (pp. 4751-4760). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2013.31.
Alhroub, A.J.A. (2016). Agile project management practices in Palestinian IT Companies: A
managerial framework (Doctoral dissertation).
Alves, E.J., & Gonçalves, C.A. (2023). Agile project portfolio management as a strategic enabler
in the Brazilian marketplace: five case studies and one substantive theory. International
Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 16(3), 475-495. DOI: 10.1108/ijmpb-02-2022-
0031. DOI: 10.1108/ijmpb-02-2022-0031.
Andreev, V.V., & Malozemov, S.N. (2020). Development of an algorithm for selecting the optimal
set of tools and techniques for Agile project management in industry and engineering. DOI:
10.30987/conferencearticle_5fce277045d821.51402831
Asfaw, L., Clemmons, M., Hayes, C., Letnaunchyn, E., & Rabieinejad, E. (2022). Challenges of
Implementing Agile Processes in Remote-First Companies. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2209.04376. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2209.04376.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 213

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Avlijaš, G. (2020). Modern approach to project management, usage, and success rate of agile
methodologies: An evidence from Serbia. In Sinteza 2020-International Scientific
Conference on Information Technology and Data Related Research (pp. 154-159).
Singidunum University. DOI: 10.15308/sinteza-2020-154-159.
Avlijaš, G. (2020). Modern approach to project management, usage, and success rate of agile
methodologies: An evidence from Serbia. In Sinteza 2020-International Scientific
Conference on Information Technology and Data Related Research (pp. 154-159).
Singidunum University. DOI: 10.15308/sinteza-2020-154-159.
Aziz, T., Saeed, S., & Alsmadi, I. (2016). Supporting agile methodologies in practice: a study of
Pakistani software industry. Sindh University Research Journal-SURJ (Science Series),
47(1).
Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Gil-Doménech, D., & Berbegal-Mirabent, N. (2017, June). Teaching agile
methodologies in a project management course. In Proceedings of the 3rd International
Conference on Higher Education Advances (pp. 312-320). Editorial Universitat Politècnica
de València. DOI: 10.4995/HEAD17.2017.5181.
Bezerra, C.M.M., Sampaio, S.C., & Marinho, M.L. (2020, August). Secure agile software
development: policies and practices for agile teams. In International Conference on the
Quality of Information and Communications Technology (pp. 343-357). Cham: Springer
International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58793-2_28.
Breitschuh, J., Albers, A., Seyb, P., Hohler, S., Benz, J., Reiß, N., & Bursac, N. (2018). Scaling
agile practices on different time scopes for complex problem solving. DS 91: Proceedings
of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14th-17th August 2018.
Bukhari, S.F.A., & Khan, H. (2014). A comparative study on usage of traditional and agile
software development methodologies in software industry of Asia. In Proceedings of the
International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP) (p. 1).
The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer
Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp).
Bushuyev, S., Bushuyeva, N., Bushuiev, D., Babayev, I., & Babayev, J. (2021, April). Modeling
Leadership for developing information technologies based on Agile methodology. In 2021
IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST)
(pp. 1-5). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465910.
Castillo, J., & Amaya, D. (n.d.). Management model based on agile methodologies for the
execution phase of software projects.
Chathuranga, S., Jayasinghe, S., Antucheviciene, J., Wickramarachchi, R., Udayanga, N., &
Weerakkody, W.S. (2023). Practices driving the adoption of agile project management
methodologies in the design stage of building construction projects. Buildings, 13(4), 1079.
DOI: 10.3390/buildings13041079.
Chathuranga, S., Wickramarachchi, R., & Jayasinghe, S. (2023, April). Factors driving the
adoption of agile methodologies in the construction industry. In 2023 IEEE International

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 214

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Conference on Contemporary Computing and Communications (InC4) (Vol. 1, pp. 1-6).

IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/InC457730.2023.10263238.
Çobanoğlu, N., & Demir, S. (2022). Crisis management, agile leadership, and organizational
culture in primary schools. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 10(2),
92-101. DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.2p.92.
Cooper, C., Booth, A., Varley-Campbell, J., Britten, N., & Garside, R. (2018). Defining the
process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and
supporting studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1-14. DOI:
10.1186/s12874-018-0545-3.
Cruz, A., & Alves, A.C. (2020). Traditional, agile and lean project management-A systematic
literature review. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 8(2). DOI:
10.19255/JMPM02407.
Ekasari, D.S., Raharjo, T., & Prasetyo, A. (2021, October). Challenges and solution
recommendation in large-scale agile implementation: a systematic literature review. In
2021 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System
(ICIMCIS (pp. 175-180). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICIMCIS53775.2021.9699312.
Feyissa, A.D. (2019). Adoption level and challenges of implementing agile project management
methodology at the private banking industry in Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Addis
Ababa University).
Ganebnykh, E., Fokina, O., & Lukinov, V. (2019). Agile project management in lean environment.
In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 135, p. 04049). EDP Sciences. DOI:
10.1051/e3sconf/201913504049.
Godin, K., Stapleton, J., Kirkpatrick, S.I., Hanning, R.M., & Leatherdale, S.T. (2015). Applying
systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines
for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1-10. DOI:
10.1186/s13643-015-0125-0.
Gray, J., Baker, E., Simmonds, D., & Cummings, J. (2018). A comparative analysis of agile
project management methodologies. Annals of the Master of Science in Computer Science
and Information Systems at UNC Wilmington, 12(1).
Gupta, S., & Sharma, S. (2014). Scaling of agile software development in industry. International
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 6(6), 301.
Gupta, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence, Analytics and Agile: Transforming Project Management
in the 21st Century. International Journal of Recent Technological Engineering, 11, 1-8.
DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.g6877.0511122.
Halani, K.R., & Jhajharia, K. (2022). A quantitative study of waterfall and agile methodologies
with the perspective of project management. In Contemporary Challenges for Agile Project
Management (pp. 111-133). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-7872-8.ch007.
Iqbal, J. (2021). The effects of agile methodologies on software project management in pakistani
software companies. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education
(TURCOMAT), 12(3), 1717-1727. DOI: 10.17762/TURCOMAT.V12I3.996.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 215

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Irtaymah, H.A., Shaari, H., & Ahmed, N. (2022). Agile project management approaches: a case
study with respect to their application in finance technology projects. Journal of Pure &
Applied Sciences, 21(4), 24-29
Janahi, A.Y. (2018). Effectiveness of Scrum Methodology in the management of software
development projects (Doctoral dissertation, The British University in Dubai (BUiD)).
Jivan, K.P., Marnewick, A.L., & Joseph, N. (2020, June). Influence of organizational culture in the
adoption of agile. In 2020 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference
(TEMSCON) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/TEMSCON47658.2020.9140091.
Kalyani, D., & Mehta, D. (2019). Study of agile scrum and Alikeness of scrum tools. International
Journal of Computer Applications, 178(43), pp.21-28. DOI: 10.5120/IJCA2019919318.
Kim, T.W., You, Y.Y., & Hong, J.W. (2021). A study on the relationship between leadership and
agile culture: focusing on the mediating effect of perceived organizational support (POS).
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 11(6), 226-242.
Koivu, A.M., Hunter, P.J., Näsänen-Gilmore, P., Muthiani, Y., Isojärvi, J., Pörtfors, P., Ashorn,
U., & Ashorn, P. (2021). Modular literature review: a novel systematic search and review
method to support priority setting in health policy and practice. BMC Medical Research
Methodology, 21(1), 1-13. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01463-y.
Kulkarni, R.H., Padmanabham, P., Harshe, M., Baseer, K.K., & Patil, P. (2017). Investigating
agile adaptation for project development. International Journal of Electrical & Computer
Engineering (2088-8708), 7(3). DOI: 10.11591/IJECE.V7I3.PP1278-1285.
Le, D. (2019). Agile practices adoption with Lean in growing entrepreneur companies (Master's
thesis, D. Le).
Leong, J., May Yee, K., Baitsegi, O., Palanisamy, L., & Ramasamy, R.K. (2023). Hybrid project
management between traditional software development lifecycle and agile based product
development for future sustainability. Sustainability, 15(2), 1121. DOI:
10.3390/su15021121.
Marques, J.A.L., dos Reis Morais, J.J.B., Alves, J., & Gonçalves, M. (2023). Effectiveness
analysis of waterfall and agile project management methodologies–a case study from
Macau's construction industry. Revista Gestão em Análise, 12(1), 23-38.
Mertz, M., Strech, D., & Kahrass, H. (2017). What methods do reviews of normative ethics
literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a
systematic review of reviews. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 1-12. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-
0661-x.
Moravcová, B., & Legény, F. (2016). “Agile Adoption” in IT Companies-Building a Change
Capability by Qualitative Description of Agile Implementation in Different Companies. In
Exploring Services Science: 7th International Conference, IESS 2016, Bucharest, Romania,
May 25-27, 2016, Proceedings 7 (pp. 251-262). Springer International Publishing. DOI:
10.1007/978-3-319-32689-4_19.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 216

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Munteanu, V.P., & Dragos, P. (2021). The case for agile methodologies against traditional ones in
financial software projects. European Journal of Business and Management Research,
6(1), 134-141. DOI: 10.24018/EJBMR.2021.6.1.741.
Munteanu, V.P., & Dragos, P. (2021). The case for agile methodologies against traditional ones in
financial software projects. European Journal of Business and Management Research,
6(1),134-141. DOI: 10.24018/EJBMR.2021.6.1.741. DOI: 10.24018/EJBMR.2021.6.1.741.
Orlov, E.V., Rogulenko, T.M., Smolyakov, O.A., Oshovskaya, N.V., Zvorykina, T.I., Rostanets,
V.G., & Dyundik, E.P. (2021). Comparative analysis of the use of kanban and scrum
methodologies in it projects. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(4), 693-700.
DOI: 10.13189/ujaf.2021.090415.
Özcan Top, Ö., Demirörs, O., & McCaffery, F. (2020). Challenges and working solutions in agile
adaptation: Experiences from the industry. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR
Workshop Proceedings.
Pal, K., & Karakostas, B. (2021). software testing under agile, scrum, and devops. In Agile Scrum
Implementation and Its Long-Term Impact on Organizations (pp. 114-131). IGI Global.
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-4885-1.CH008.
Piedrahita, C., Alzate-Espinosa, G.A., Herrera-Schlesinger, M.C., Naranjo-Agudelo, A., Araujo-
Guerrero, E.F., Torres-Hernández, C.A., & Benítez-Peláez, C.A. (2023). Scrum
methodology adaptation in the non-software industry: agile management of a research
initiative. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 16(3), 368-399. DOI:
10.1504/ijasm.2023.10056694.
Popova, O. (2019). Adaptation of flexible project management models based on Scrum and
Kanban technologies. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(2 (48), 4-10. DOI:
10.15587/2312-8372.2019.180459.
Rajan, E.R., & Santhosh, V.A. (2021). Adoption of Agile Methodology for iMproving it project
perforMAnce. Serbian Journal of Management, 16(2). DOI: 10.5937/sjm16-26854.
Raslan, A.T., & El-Licy, F.A. (2012). An agile-based framework for development of e-government
projects.
Rodrigues, I., & Rabetti, D. (2021). Gestão adaptativa de projetos: um levantamento dos artefatos
mais utilizados para gerenciar o escopo do projeto. Gestão e Projetos: GeP, 12(1), 95-122.
DOI: 10.5585/GEP.V12I1.18632.
Rolland, K.H., Fitzgerald, B., Dingsøyr, T., & Stol, K.J. (2023). Acrobats and safety-nets:
problematizing large-scale agile software development. ACM Transactions on Software
Engineering and Methodology. DOI: 10.1145/3617169.
Sadi, M.H., & Ramsin, R. (2009, July). APM3: A methodology metamodel for agile project
management. In SoMeT (pp. 367-378). DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-049-0-367.
Sathe, C.A., & Panse, C. (2023). An empirical study on impact of project management constraints
in agile software development: multigroup analysis between Scrum and Kanban. Brazilian
Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(3), 1796-1796. DOI:
10.14488/bjopm.1796.2023.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 217

 Computer Science & IT Research Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2024

Shakya, P., & Shakya, S. (2020). Critical success factor of agile methodology in software industry
of Nepal. Journal of Information Technology, 2(03), 135-143. DOI:
10.36548/jitdw.2020.3.001.
Succi, G., Masyagin, S., Ivanov, V., Gizzatullina, I., Ergasheva, S., & Ciancarini, P. (2021).
Empirical research on customer communication challenges in the companies adopting agile
practices. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information
Systems-Volume 2: ICEIS (pp. 139-150).
Suetin, S. (2016). Results of agile project management implementation in software engineering
companies. DOI: 10.1051/ITMCONF/20160603016.
Uikey, N., & Suman, U. (2012, September). An empirical study to design an effective agile project
management framework. In Proceedings of the CUBE International Information
Technology Conference (pp. 385-390). DOI: 10.1145/2381716.2381788.
Wafa, R., Khan, M.Q., Malik, F., Abdusalomov, A.B., Cho, Y.I., & Odarchenko, R. (2022). The
impact of agile methodology on project success, with a moderating role of Person’s job fit
in the IT industry of Pakistan. Applied Sciences, 12(21), 10698.
Weichbroth, P. (2022). A case study on implementing agile techniques and practices: Rationale,
benefits, barriers and business implications for hardware development. Applied Sciences,
12(17), 8457. DOI: 10.3390/app12178457.
Wicaksana, S.A., Purwoko, B., & Sihite, M. (2022). Role of organization culture on organizational
agility for digital transformation in xyz government organization. DOI:
10.35409/ijbmer.2022.3391.
Wright, D. (2018). Best practices for large-scale agile transformations.
Younus, D.A.M., & Younis, H. (2021). Conceptual framework of agile project management,
affecting project performance, key: requirements and challenges. International Journal of
Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (IJIREM). DOI:
10.21276/IJIREM.2021.8.4.3.
Zasornova, I.R.Y.N.A., Lysenko, S.E.R.G.I.I., & Zasornov, O.L.E.K.S.A.N.D.R. (2022). Choosing
scrum or kanban methodology for project management in it companies. DOI:
10.31891/csit-2022-4-1.
Zavyalova, E., Sokolov, D., & Lisovskaya, A. (2020). Agile vs traditional project management
approaches: Comparing human resource management architectures. International Journal
of Organizational Analysis, 28(5), pp.1095-1112. DOI: 10.1108/ijoa-08-2019-1857.
Žužek, T., Gosar, Ž., Kušar, J., & Berlec, T. (2020). Adopting agile project management practices
in non-software SMEs: A case study of a slovenian medium-sized manufacturing company.
Sustainability, 12(21), 9245. DOI: 10.3390/su12219245.

Daraojimba, Nwasike, Adegbite, Ezeigweneme, & Gidiagba, P. 190-218 Page 218