Macro Economics
Macro Economics
1. INTRODUCTION
Economic model:
Simplified models of a complex reality where irrelevant details are stripped away, which can be used
to show relationships between variables and explain economy’s behaviour
Effects of increase in income (Y): Demand curve shifts to the right due to higher purchasing power.
Equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity increases.
Effects of increase in raw material price (Ps): Supply curve shifts to the left – Producers have to
produce same quantity of goods at a higher cost.
A Firm’s Value Added = value of its output minus value of intermediate goods used for
production
GDP = value of final goods produced
= sum of value added at all stages of production
Factors of Production
Capital (K) – tools, machines, structures used in production
Labor (L) – efforts of workers in production
Production function: Y = F(K, L)
Where Y: output that can be produced from K units of capital and L units of labor.
Returns to scale
If all inputs are scaled by a factor z, ie., K2 = z * K1 and L2 = z * L1
If Y2 = z * Y1 ---- constant returns to scale
If Y2 > z * Y1 ---- increasing returns to scale
If Y2 < z * Y1 ---- decreasing returns to scale
Example:
Technology is fixed
Economy’s supplies of capital and labor are fixed at: K = K’, L = L’
Output determined by fixed factors and fixed state of technology: Y’ = F(K’, L’)
Demand for factors of production:
Similarly, firms maximise profits by choosing K such that MPK = R / P , where R : Rent
Y = AK αL1- α
A: Level of technology
Demand Side of the model:
C : Consumer demand for goods and services
I : Demand for investment goods
G : Government demand for goods and services
NX : net exports = 0 for a closed economy
Consumption, C
Disposable Income: Y – T
Consumption is a function of Y – T
C = C(Y-T)
Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC): Increase in C caused by a one-unit increase in disposable
income. MPC is the slope of the consumption function.
Consumption function:
Investment, I
Investment is a function of real interest rate, r
I = I(r)
Real interest rate is the cost of borrowing or opportunity cost of using own funds for investmenting
If r increases, I decreases.
Investment function:
Government spending, G
G is government spending on goods and services
Assume govt spending and total taxes are exogenous
G = G’
Taxes:
T = T’
Aggregate demand:
Y’ = C(Y’-T’) + I(r) + G’
Aggregate supply:
Y’ = F(K’, L’)
The real interest rate (r) adjusts to equate demand with supply.
In an open economy:
C = Cd + C f
I = Id + If
G = Gd + Gf
Where superscripts,
Y = C + I + G + NX
NX = Y – (C + I + G)
NX = net exports
Y = Output
C + I + G = domestic spending
Net Capital Outflow(NCO)- if a country’s savers supply more funds than its firms wish to borrow for
investment, the excess of loan-able funds will flow abroad in the form of net capital outflow (the
purchase of foreign assets). Alternatively, if firms wish to borrow more than domestic savers wish to
lend, then the firms borrow the excess on international financial markets; in this case, there’s a net
inflow of loan-able funds, and S < I.
NCO = S – I
NX = Y – (C + I + G)
NX = (Y – C – G) – I
=S–I
a. domestic & foreign bonds are perfect substitutes (same risk, maturity, etc.)
Results:
ΔI = 0
ΔNX = ΔS < 0
In a small open economy, the fixed world interest rate pins down the value of investment, regardless
of fiscal policy changes. The analysis on this slide applies to ANYTHING that causes a decrease in
saving. Other examples: a shift in consumer preferences regarding the tradeoff between saving and
consumption, or a change in the tax laws that reduces the incentive to save.
A fiscal expansion in other countries would reduce S* and raise r*. The higher world interest rate
reduces investment in our small open economy, and hence reduces the demand for loan-able funds.
The supply of loan-able funds (national saving) is unchanged, so there’s an increase in the amount of
funds flowing abroad.
Results:
ΔI < 0
ΔNX = -ΔI > 0
An increase in investment demand
ΔI > 0,
ΔS = 0,
In contrast to a closed economy, investment is not constrained by the fixed (domestic) supply of
loan-able funds. Hence, the increase in firm’s demand for loan-able funds can be satisfied by
borrowing abroad, which reduces net outflow of financial capital. And since net capital outflow = NX,
we see a fall in NX equal to the increase in investment.
e = nominal exchange rate, the relative price of domestic currency in terms of foreign currency
ε = real exchange rate, the relative price of domestic goods in terms of foreign goods
e.g. Japanese Big Mac per U.S. Big Mac
ε = (e * P) / P*
Where, P and P* are the overall price levels of the domestic & foreign countries. Thus, they each
measure the price of a basket of goods.
The real exchange rate measures the amount of purchasing power in Japan that must be sacrificed
for each unit of purchasing power in the U.S. A good candidate for the basket of goods mentioned
here is the CPI basket. Perhaps a better candidate would be a basket including all goods & services
that comprise GDP. Then, the real exchange rate would measure how many units of foreign GDP
trade for one unit of domestic GDP.
EX, IM
NX
The net exports function reflects this inverse relationship between NX and ε:
NX = NX(ε )
Determination of ε
NX is actually the net demand for dollars: foreign demand for dollars to purchase our exports minus
our supply of dollars to purchase imports. Net capital outflow is the net supply of dollars: The
supply of dollars from U.S. residents investing abroad minus the demand for dollars from foreigners
buying U.S. assets.
Fiscal Policy at home
A fiscal expansion reduces national saving, net capital outflow, and the supply of dollars
in the foreign exchange market. Also, the real exchange rate to rise and NX to fall.
An increase in r* reduces investment, increasing net capital outflow and the supply of dollars in the
foreign exchange market, causing the real exchange rate to fall and NX to rise.
↓IM ↑NX
demand for dollars shifts right
Trade policy doesn’t affect S or I, so capital flows and the supply of dollars remain fixed.
Results:
Δε>0
(demand increase)
Δ NX = 0
(supply fixed)
Δ IM < 0
(policy)
Δ EX < 0
(rise in ε)
The nominal exchange rate adjusts to equalize the cost of a basket of goods across
countries.
Reasoning:
e P = P*
P P* P
If e = P*/P, then ε e * 1
P *
P P
And NX is horizontal;
The key difference between short run and long run in economics is the behavior of prices. In
the short-run prices are sticky (unchanging) while in the long run prices are flexible.
Aggregate Demand
Keynesian Cross
The Keynesian Cross is a simple closed economy model in which income is determined by
expenditure. It is the simplest interpretation of Keynes’ theory of national income and is a
building block for the more realistic IS-LM model.
E = C(Ȳ - T) + Ī + Ḡ
In the equilibrium condition (income is at equilibrium value), the planned expenditure should
equal the actual expenditure
Y=E
- Government Purchases
Increase in government purchases leads to a multiplier effect in the growth of the
economy (this multiplier is greater than 1)
Y = Change in Income
G = Change in government purchases
MPC = Marginal Propensity to Consume
- Tax
Decrease in taxes leads to a multiplier effect in the growth of the economy
Y = Change in Income
G = Change in government taxes
MPC = Marginal Propensity to Consume
IS (Income-Savings) Curve
The IS curve is a graph of all combinations of output Y and interest rate r for which the
market is in equilibrium, i.e. actual expenditure (output) = planned expenditure.
It is denoted by the equation,
Y = C(Y - T) + I(r) + Ḡ
An increase in income from Y1 to Y2 raises saving and thus lowers the interest rate that
equilibrates the supply and demand for loanable funds. The IS curve expresses this negative
relationship between income and the interest rate.
The Theory of Liquidity Preference
This is a theory put forward by John Maynard Keynes that states that the interest rate
adjusts to balance the supply and demand for money.
If the price level is fixed, a reduction in the money supply reduces the supply of real money
which leads to a rise in equilibrium interest rates.
Income, Money Demand, and the LM curve
The LM curve is the graph of all combinations of interest rates and output that equate the
supply and demand for real money balances.
An increase in income raises money demand. Since the supply of real balances is fixed,
there is now excess demand in the money market at the initial interest rate.
The interest rate must rise to restore equilibrium in the money market.
Y = C(Y - T) + I(r) + Ḡ
07. Aggregate Demand II
The IS-LM model, which stands for "investment-savings, liquidity-money," is a Keynesian
macroeconomic model that shows how the market for economic goods (IS) interacts with the
loan-able funds market (LM), or money market, and it is represented as a graph in which the
IS and LM curve intersect to show the short-run equilibrium between interest rates and
output. Y C (Y T ) I (r ) G
The IS curve represents equilibrium in the goods market.
The LM curve represents money market equilibrium. M P L (r ,Y )
The intersection determines the unique combination of Y and r that satisfies equilibrium in
both markets.
• fiscal policy: G
and/or T
• monetary policy: M
A Tax Cut
1. The IS curve shifts by (-MPC/1 - MPC)* ΔT
2. r rises so the final increase in Y is smaller
than the direct effect of a tax cut
M P L(r *,Y )
The LM* curve: Money market eq’m
e > 0, Y = 0
Crowding out
closed economy:
Fiscal policy crowds out investment by causing the interest rate to rise.
small open economy:
Fiscal policy crowds out net exports by causing the exchange rate to appreciate.
Monetary policy under floating exchange rates
An increase in M shifts LM* right
because Y must rise to restore equilibrium in
the money market.
Results:
e < 0, Y > 0
Expansionary monetary policy does not raise world agg. demand, it merely shifts demand
from foreign to domestic products. So, the increases in domestic income and employment
are at the expense of losses abroad.
e > 0, Y = 0
Import restrictions cannot reduce a trade deficit.
Even though NX is unchanged, there is less trade:
the trade restriction reduces imports.
the exchange rate appreciation reduces exports.
Less trade means fewer “gains from trade.”
Import restrictions on specific products save jobs in the domestic industries that produce
those products, but destroy jobs in export-producing sectors.
Hence, import restrictions fail to increase total employment.
Also, import restrictions create “sectoral shifts,” which cause frictional unemployment.
Fixed exchange rates
Under fixed exchange rates, the central bank stands ready to buy or sell the
domestic currency for foreign currency at a predetermined rate.
In the Mundell-Fleming model, the central bank shifts the LM* curve as required to
keep e at its preannounced rate.
This system fixes the nominal exchange rate. In the long run, when prices are
flexible, the real exchange rate can move even if the nominal rate is fixed.
Fiscal policy under fixed exchange rates
Under floating rates,
fiscal policy is ineffective
at changing output.
Under fixed rates,
fiscal policy is very effective at changing output.
Results:
e = 0, Y > 0
e = 0, Y = 0
Trade policy under fixed exchange rates
A restriction on imports puts upward pressure on e.
To keep e from rising, the central bank must
sell domestic currency, which increases M
and shifts LM* right.
Results:
e = 0, Y > 0
Under floating rates, import restrictions
do not affect Y or NX.
Under fixed rates, import restrictions
increase Y and NX.
Floating vs. fixed exchange rates
Argument for floating rates:
allows monetary policy to be used to pursue other goals (stable growth, low
inflation).
Arguments for fixed rates:
avoids uncertainty and volatility, making international transactions easier.
disciplines monetary policy to prevent excessive money growth &
hyperinflation.
Interest-rate differentials
Two reasons why r may differ from r*
country risk: The risk that the country’s borrowers will default on their loan
repayments because of political or economic turmoil. Lenders require a higher
interest rate to compensate them for this risk.
expected exchange rate changes: If a country’s exchange rate is expected to fall,
then its borrowers must pay a higher interest rate to compensate lenders for the
expected currency depreciation.
Expected change in exchange rates
When a foreigner buys a domestic bond, they really earn more than just r, the
interest rate.
They are holding a dollar asset. Foreigners gain if the dollar itself gains value
relative to the foreign currency.
e1 e
The expected appreciation of the dollar:
e
Interest parity
The total expected return for a foreigner isr
ee1 e
e
“Interest parity” says that the return on the home country’s bonds equal the foreign
ee1 e
interest rate:
r r *
e
ee1
e
1 r * r
Home currency is stronger if:
Home interest rate, r, rises
Foreign interest rate, r*, falls
Expected exchange rate increases
The short-run equilibrium
Let’s write the equation for exchange rates as
e = e(r,r*,ee)
Now let’s go back to our IS equation:
Y = C(Y-T) + I(r) +G + NX(e)
= C(Y-T) + I(r) +G + NX(e(r,r*,ee))
We have solved out for the exchange rate.
IS depends on the interest rate, r.
IS is shifted by changes in r* and ee
The LM curve is unchanged. For the open-economy, we can write an IS-LM model that is
similar to the closed economy:
Y C (Y T ) I (r ) G M P L (r ,Y )
e
NX (e (r , r *, e ))
An increase in government purchases
1. IS curve shifts right
2. r rises and Y rises
3. e rises, from interest parity
4. NX must fall.
The home country interest rate can rise.
We do not have to have r = r*
There is crowding out – as G rises, NX falls.
But it is not complete crowding out. NX does not fall as much as G rises.
So, Y rises when G rises.
Exogenous changes in demand can affect output.
Key Points
- Solow’s model is a model for long run economic growth and helps in
understanding the factors that determine the economic growth for different countries.
- It attempts to explain long-run economic growth by looking at capital accumulation
(K), labour or population growth (L), and increases in productivity, commonly
referred to as technological progress or also as knowledge (A).
- A 'steady-state growth path' is reached when output, capital and labour are all
growing at the same rate, so output per worker and capital per worker are constant.
- The Solow model features the idea of catch-up growth when a poorer country is
catching up with a developed country, often via a higher marginal rate of return on
invested capital in faster-growing countries.
- The Solow–Swan model augmented with human capital predicts that the income
levels of poor countries will tend to catch up with or converge towards the income
levels of rich countries if the poor countries have similar savings rates for both
physical capital and human capital as a share of output, a process known as
conditional convergence.
Brief Explanation
Prof. Solow has assumed technical coefficients of production to be variable, so that the
capital labour ratio may adjust itself to equilibrium ratio. If the capital labour ratio is larger
than equilibrium ratio, than that of the growth of capital and output capital would be lesser
than labour force. At some time, the two ratios would be equal to each other.
In other words, this is the steady growth, according to Prof. Solow as there is the steady
growth there is a tendency to the equilibrium path. It must be noted here that the capital-
labour ratio may be either higher or lower.
This model also exhibits the possibility of multiple equilibrium positions. The position of
unstable equilibrium will arise when the rate of growth is not equal to the capital labour ratio.
There are other two stable equilibrium points with high capital labour ratio and the other with
low capital labour ratio.