Flowersexratioinmango
Flowersexratioinmango
Flowersexratioinmango
net/publication/233885353
CITATIONS READS
25 2,330
5 authors, including:
Mumtaz Khan
Sultan Qaboos University
221 PUBLICATIONS 2,875 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Muhammad Usman on 01 June 2014.
ABSTRACT
Three commercial cultivars of mango i.e. ‘Anwar Rataul’, ‘Dasehari’ and ‘Langra’ were studied for panicle initiation time,
total number of flowers and proportion of male to hermaphrodite flowers. Early panicle initiation was observed in ‘dasehari’
on eastern side of the plant followed by ‘Langra’ and ‘Anwar Rataul’. Langra depicted highest number of flowers (598.75)
with maximum hermaphrodite flowers (473.08; 79%) on west and southern side of the plant, respectively. The least male
flowers (125.75) were also found in ‘Langra’. ‘Anwar Ratual’ depicted minimum number (59.83; 7.25%) of hermaphrodite
flowers. Proportion of hermaphrodite flowers in all the three cultivars was quite variable regarding plant side. Such studies in
commercial cultivars of mango will certainly be helpful in understanding its floral biology to improve the fruit plant yield.
under uniform agronomic and climatic conditions. There Differences in male flower count at the four sides within the
were three replications in each cultivar i.e., Anwar Rataul, cultivars was also found significant in cv. Anwar Rataul and
Dasehari and Langra. A panicle was tagged on each side of Langra but insignificant in cv. Dashehari. Maximum
plant. Panicle initiation data was noted with the emergence number of male flowers was observed on panicles of South
of first panicle on the tree. Male and Hermaphrodite flowers (1197.6) and West (215.6) sides in cvs. Anwar Rataul and
were counted on panicles tagged twice a week throughout Langra, respectively.
the flowering season with forceps and contact lens. Both
male and hermaphrodite flowers were detached after Number of hermaphrodite flowers. Highly significant
counting. Then the percentage of male, hermaphrodite and (P>0.05) difference among three cultivars was observed
total number of flowers was calculated. The experiment was regarding number of hermaphrodite flowers (Table II).
laid out in the randomised complete block design (RCBD) Maximum number of hermaphrodite flowers was noted in
and data was analysed by Duncan’s Multiple Range test Langra (473), which was significantly (P>0.05) greater than
(DMR) at P> 0.05. Dasehari (168.8) and Anwar Rataul (59.8, Table II). On the
other hand, hermaphrodite flower number on different sides
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION of three cultivars was quite variable. In Anwar Rataul,
maximum hermaphrodite number was observed on the
Panicle initiation date. Among three cultivars, panicle panicle on the North side (100) while in Langra maximum
initiation was observed in cv. Dasehari i.e., on February 1st; hermaphrodite number was found on the panicle of the
followed by Langra i.e., on February 7th and lastly in South side. But in Dashehari, maximum hermaphrodite
Anwar Rataul i.e., on February 12th. It was also observed number was noted on panicle of the Eastern side of the
that in all cultivars panicles initiation was started from the plant. Our findings are supported by Majumdar and
south side of the plant. This seems to be due to more Mukherjee (1961) and Desai et al. (1985) who observed
exposure of south side of the plant to sunlight hence highest percentage of perfect flowers on the north and
becoming warmer than all other directions. This warmness lowest on the eastern side of the plants of `Hemsagar',
might be the cause of earliest panicle initiation at the south ‘Alphanoso’, ‘Goamankur’ and ‘Kesar’ cultivars of mango,
side in all the cultivars. Our results are not in accordance respectively. The variability in the flower sex ratio seems to
with the observations of Desai et al. (1985) who observed be governed by a cultivar of physiological and
highest percentage of hermaphrodite flowers on the north environmental conditions.
side and the least on the east side of `Alphanso'
`Goamankur' and `Kesar' mangoes cultivars. This difference Table II. Number of hermaphrodite flowers/panicle
could be due to cultivar response to the prevailing
environment conditions. Side Anwar Rataul Langra Dasehari
East 42.0 c 429.3 bc 225.3 a
Number of male flowers. Statistical analysis showed that West 36.6 c 543.3 ab 108.0 c
cultivars varied significantly (P>0.05) among each other North 100.6 a 337.3 c 195.0 ab
with respect to the number of male flowers (Table I). South 60.0 b 591.3 a 147.0 bc
Mean 59.8 c 473.0 a 168.8 b
Table I. Number of male flowers/panicle
Total number of flowers per panicles. Data regarding total
Side Anwar Rataul Langra Dasehari number of flowers per panicle showed significant difference
East 798.6 ab 47.0 c 624 ab among cultivars and the sides of the plant. The cv. Anwar
West 633.0 b 215.6 a 1033 a Rataul has significantly (P>0.05) greater number of flowers
North 428.0 b 117.6 b 469 c
South 1197.6 a 122.6 b 411 c
(824.1) but it was statistically at par with Dasehari (803.2)
Mean 764.3 a 125.7 b 634 a while Langra has significantly less number of total flowers
Different letters in columns are statistically significant (P>0.05) (598.7, Table III). On the other hand, in cv. Anwar Rataul
maximum flowers were counted on the panicles of south
The cultivar Anwar Rataul had significantly (P>0.05) side (1257.6) while in cvs. Langra and Dasehari total flower
highest number of male flowers (764.3) but statistically at number was found highest on the panicles of west side i.e.,
par with Dasehari while Langra had significantly less 750 and 1141.0, respectively.
number of male flowers (125.7). These results for the
cultivar Anwar Rataul are further strengthened by the Table III. Total number of flowers/panicle
findings of Burns and Prayag (1911), Popenoe (1917),
Maheshwari (1934), Musahib-ud-Din and Dinsa (1946), Side Anwar rataul Langra Dasehari
Bajwa et al., (1956), Singh (1971), Chacko and Randhawa East 840.6 ab 476.3 b 849.3 b
(1971), El-Nabawy et al. (1983), Gunjate et al. (1983), West 667.6 b 750.0 a 1141.0 a
North 528.6 b 455.0 b 664.6 c
Pimentel et al. (1984), Chadha and Pal (1986), Baghel et al. South 1257.6 a 714.0 a 558.0 c
(1988), Hussein et al. (1989), and Joubert et al. (1993). Mean 824.1 a 598.8 b 803.2 a
221
ASIF et al. / Int. J. Agri. Biol., Vol. 4, No. 2, 2002
Percentage of male and hermaphrodite flowers. Baghel, B.S., D.A. Sarnaik and P.K.R. Nair, 1988. Flowering and fruiting
behaviour of different varieties of mango (Mangifera indica L.)
Significantly (P>0.05) highest number of male flowers under Jabalpur conditions. PKV Res. J., 12: 37–9.
(764.33) were observed in cv. Anwar Rataul followed by Bajwa, B.S., J.C. Bakshi and T.S. Kocher, 1956. A note of the floral biology
Dasehari (634.41) while it was significantly lowest (125.75) of Mangifera indica L. var. Dashehri. Indian J. Hort., 13: 206–9.
in cv. Langra (Table IV). Khan and Singh (1946) also Burns, W. and S.M. Prayag, 1921. The Book of Mango. Bulletin, 103. Dept.
of Agri., Bombay.
reported minimum number of male flowers in Langra. On Chacko, E.K. and G.S. Randhawa, 1971. Towards an understanding of the
the other hand, significantly highest number of factors affecting flowering in Mango. Andhra Agri. J., 18: 226–36.
hermaphrodite flowers (473.08) was observed in the cv. Chad, N.K. 1964. Studies on fruit drop in mango, fruit set, its retention and
Langra followed by cv. Dasehari. This high percentage of factors effecting it. Indian J. Hort., 21: 172–85.
Chadha, K.L. and R.N. Pal, 1986. Mangifera indica. In: Halevy, A.C. (ed.)
hermaphrodite flowers is found to be closely associated with CRC Handbook of Flowering, Vol. 5: 211–30. CRC Press, Boca
the more productivity in Langra (Mukherjee, 1953). The cv. Raton, Florida.
Anwar Rataul exhibited lowest number of hermaphrodite Cobin, M., 1950. Mango selection, propagation and culture. Univ. Florida
flower (59.83). The results of cv. Dashehari are in contrast Agri. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rep., pp. 257–9.
Desai, A.G., V.P. Lionaye and R.T. Gunjate, 1985. Floral biology of
with the finding of Ali (1960) who observed high number of Alphanso, Goamaukur and Kesa varieties of mango. J. Maharashtra
hermaphrodite flowers in cv. Dashehari. These results are Agri. Univ., 10: 193–5.
further strengthened by (Burns & Prayag, 1911; Popenoe, El-Nabawy, S.M., A.M. El-Hammady, A.S. Khalifa, M.A. Rawash and
1917; Maheshwari 1934; Musahib-ud-Din & Dinsa, 1946; H.M. El-Masry, 1983. Studies of floral induction, sex expression and
fruit drop in relation to alternate bearing habit of ‘Langra’ and
Bajwa et al., 1956; Singh, 1971; Chacko & Randhawa, ‘Ewais’ mango varieties. Ann. Agri. Sci., Ain Shama Univ., Cairo,
1971; El-Nabawy et al., 1983; Gunjate et al., 1983; 28: 1–463.
Pimentel et al., 1984; Chadha & Pal, 1986; Baghel et al., FAO, 2000. Production Yearbook. Food and Agricultural Organization of
1988; Hussein et al., 1989; and Joubert et al., 1993) who the United Nations, Rome.
Gunjate, R.T., D.P. Jorwekar and B.L. Lad, 1983. Pollination, fruit set and
observed a variable proportion of hermaphrodite/perfect fruit drop in Alphonso mango. J. Maharashtra Agri. Univ., 8: 168–
flowers to the male/staminate flowers (sex ratio) within the 70.
panicles, trees and among the cultivars but it was usually Hussein, M.A., H.M. Mahmoud, K.I.A. Amen and A.T. Abo-El-Ez, 1989.
less than 50% except cv. Langra (79%). Comparitive studies on sex distribution of some mango varieties
Mangifera indica L. under Assuit conditions. Assuit J. Agri. Sci., 20:
79–82.
Table IV. Number of male and hermaphrodite flowers Iyer, C.P.A., M.C. Subbaiah, M.D. Subramanyam and G.S.P. Rao, 1989.
in various mango cultivars Screening of germplasm and correlation among certain characters in
mango. Acta Hort., 231: 83–90.
Joubert, J.P., P.J. Robbertse, L.A. Coetzer and D.L. Wishart, 1993.
Cultivars No. of Flowers Infloresence characteristics and flower sex ratio studies of container
Male %age Hermaphrodite %age Total grown mango trees. S. African Mango Growers’ Assoc. Yearbook,
Anwar 764.33 a 92.74 59.83 c 7.25 824.16 a 13: 27–33.
Rataul Khan, M.D and H. Singh, 1946. Floral counts and fruit set studies in
Langra 125.75 c 20.99 473.08 a 79.01 598.83 b mangoes. Pb. Fruit. J., 10: 37.
Dasehari 634.41 b 78.98 168.83 b 21.01 803.25 a Kostermans, A.J.G.H. and J.M. Bompard, 1993. The Mangoes, Their
Figures showing similar letters in columns are statistically non- Botany, Nomenclature, Horticulture and Utilization. Academic
significant (P>0.05) Press, London.
Maheshwari, P., 1934. The Indian Mango. Current Sci., 3: 97.
Majumdar, P.K. and S.K. Mukherjee, 1961. Studied on the variability of sex
CONCLUSION expression in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Indian J. Hort., 18: 12–
9.
The results can be concluded as south side of the Mukherjee, S.K. 1953. The mango, its Botany, cultivation uses and future
improvement, especially as observed in India. Econ. Bot., 7: 130–62.
plants of all the cultivars studied proved to be the earliest for Mukherjee, S.K., 1953a. Origin, distribution and phylogenetic affinities of
the panicle initiation. This could have happened due to its the species of Mangifera indica L. J. Linn. Soc. Bot., 55: 65–83.
more exposure to the sunlight. Anwar Rataul and Dashehari Musahib-ud-Din and H.S. Dinsa, 1946. The floral count and fruit set studies
showed significantly more number of male flowers than in some of the north Indian Mango varieties. Pb. Fruit J., 10: 35–42.
Nakhlla, F.G. 1980. Physiological studies on mangoes M.Sc. Thesis,
Langra on south and west sides of the plant, respectively. Zagazig University, Egypt.
Langra gave maximum number of hermaphrodite flowers Pimentel, R.B., R.E. Coronel and R.F.C. Espino, 1984. Floral biology and
on south side while total flower number was less in it. fruit set in mango (Mangifera indica L.) cvs. ‘Carabao’, ‘Pico’ and
Number of hermaphrodite flowers in all the three cultivars ‘Kancha Mitha’. Philipine J. Crop Sci., 9: 47–51.
Popenoe, W., 1917. Manual of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, p. 474. The
was quite variable regarding side of the plant. McMillan Co., New York.
Purseglove, J.W., 1972. Mangoes west of India. Acta Hort., 24: 107–74.
REFERENCES Scholefield, P.B. and D.R. Oag, 1984. Flowering and fruit set of six
cultivars of mango. Proc. Ist. Austr. Mango Res. Workshop, pp: 96–
103. CSIRO, Melbourne.
Ali, K., 1960, Effect of different cultural treatments on the flower sex ratio
Singh, R.N., 1971. Biennial bearing in fruit trees. ICAR Tech. Bull. (Agri.)
and production of fruit in mango. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Agri.,
No., 30. Ind. Council Agri. Res., New Delhi.
Faisalabad–Pakistan.
(Received 13 February 2002; Accepted 06 March 2002)
222