Expert Judgment Format
Uploaded by
ScribdTranslationsExpert Judgment Format
Uploaded by
ScribdTranslationsNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF TRUJILLO
School of Systems Engineering
Validation format by experts
DPT Coding - Version Validity Pages
001 01 2018 01
Lady)
…………………………………………………………………………………………
Present.-
I have the pleasure of addressing you, to greet you cordially and at the same time to tell
you that, knowing your academic and professional career, we disturb your attention by
choosing you as an EXPERT JUDGE to review the content of the instrument that we
intend to use in the Thesis entitled …………….......…………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………………….,
to opt for the Bachelor's degree in Systems Engineering, for the School of Systems
Engineering of the National University of Trujillo.
The instrument aims to measure the variable ……………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………, so, in order to
determine the validity of its content, we ask you to mark the degree of evaluation of the
indicators for the items of the instrument, according to their extensive experience and
knowledge. The instrument and the operationalization matrix of the variable are
attached, considering dimensions, indicators, categories and measurement scale.
We thank you in advance for your collaboration and we are sure that your
opinion and expert judgment will serve the proposed purposes.
Sincerely,
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF TRUJILLO
School of Systems Engineering
Validation format by experts
DPT Coding - Version Validity Pages
001 01 2018 02
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT EXPERT OPINION REPORT I. GENERAL DATA:
1.1. Surnames and names of the informant (Expert):
……………………………………………………………
1.2. Academic
degree. .......................................................................................................................................................
.............
1.3 Profession: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
1.4. Institution where you work: …………………………………………………………………………..
….........
1.5. Job that performs: .............................................. .................................................. .....................
1.6 Instrument Name :
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………..….
1.7. Author of the instrument: …………………………………………………………………………………..
…………
1.8 Professional Academic School : …………….
………………………………………………………….
II. VALIDATION
According to the following indicators, rate each of the items as appropriate.
CATEGORY QUALIFICATION INDICATOR
SUFFICIENCY 1 Does not meet the criteria The items are not sufficient to measure the dimension
2. Low level The items measure some aspect of the dimension but
The items that belong to do not correspond to the total dimension
the same dimension are 3. Moderate level Some items must be increased to be able to evaluate the
enough to obtain its dimension completely. The items are sufficient
4. High level
measurement.
CLARITY 1 Does not meet the criteria The item is not clear
2. Low level The item requires quite a few modifications or a very
The item is easily large modification in the use of words according to their
understood, that is, its meaning or their order.
syntax and semantics are A very specific modification of some of the terms of the
3. Moderate level item is required.
adequate.
4. High level The item is clear, has adequate semantics and syntax.
COHERENCE 1 Does not meet the criteria The item has no logical relationship with the dimension
2. Low level The item has a tangential relationship with the
The item has a logical 3. Moderate level dimension. The item has a moderate relationship with
relationship with the the dimension it is measuring.
dimension or indicator it is 4. High level The item is completely related to the dimension it is
measuring. measuring.
RELEVANCE 1 Does not meet the criteria The item can be eliminated without affecting the
measurement of the dimension
2. Low Level The item has some relevance, but another item
may be including what it measures.
The item is essential or 3. Moderate level The item is relatively important.
important, that is, it must 4. High level The item is very relevant and should be
including. included.
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF TRUJILLO
School of Systems Engineering
Validation format by experts
DPT Coding - Version Validity Pages
001 01 2018 03
VALIDATION RESULTS
3.1. Opinion: FAVORABLE __________ SHOULD IMPROVE ___________
NOT FAVORABLE __________
3.2. Observations:
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Trujillo, on the xx day of the month of xxxxxxxx of 2018
____________________________________
Signature
