Environment Monitoring
Environment Monitoring
1. Environment monitoring...................................................................................................1
1.1. Environment monitoring process and scope.............................................................1
5.1.1. The macro environment.....................................................................................2
5.1.2. The industrial environment...............................................................................3
5.1.3. The competitive environment............................................................................4
5.1.4. The internal environment..................................................................................4
5.2. Monitoring Approach................................................................................................4
5.3. Monitoring the environment and driving forces......................................................5
5.4. Organization of information about the environment...............................................6
5.5. Effective observation of the environment.................................................................7
6. Considerations for your application.................................................................................8
7. Search for values................................................................................................................8
7.1. Congruence of organizational values........................................................................9
7.2. Elements of the search for values............................................................................10
7.2.1. Personal values..................................................................................................10
7.2.2. Organizational values.......................................................................................12
7.2.3. Operational philosophy....................................................................................13
7.2.4. Organizational culture.....................................................................................14
7.3. Analysis of interest groups.......................................................................................17
7.3.1. Exchange processes...........................................................................................17
7.3.2. Identification of interest groups......................................................................18
SUMMARY...............................................................................................................................20
CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................26
ENVIRONMENT MONITORING AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR ITS
APPLICATION
1. Environment monitoring
All organizations have a vital need to record what is happening, or what is about
to happen, in their environments. Although change has been the only constant in
the world, its rate is accelerating and organizations that do not attempt to
manage these increasing and rapid changes face unstable futures. Only by
monitoring an organization's environment can it record and understand these
changes. As Murphy (1989) concluded from a review of the literature on
monitoring, Most companies do it poorly and unconsciously, even when it is
done well, the information collected is not used for the development of
alternative futures.
Strategic planning requires that a company take the time to seriously examine
how it monitors the environments that have a direct impact on its future and how
it processes the information it obtains. Since the applied strategic planning
model involves monitoring the environment. Consequently, the model shows
this as a continuous aspect of the planning process. Continuous data should
provide information to the planning team and the entire company about what is
happening, and the possibility of something happening that could affect the
company's normal operations, its planning process, and its future. .
1
be considered as part of the strategic planning process. These could include
cyclical economic trends, the development of novel and yet to be approved
technologies, the emergence of new, untested competitors, and the gradual
disappearance of a critical job skill set in the workforce. Likewise, the public
sector is affected by the aforementioned trends (for example, total quality
management, customer service and cost-benefit analysis).
2
Several social observers have clearly explained some of these
changes. One of them, Nasbiu (1982), identified the following
emerging trends that will transform our lives, especially our
organizational lives:
3
detects these changes and responds positively to them has a
competitive advantage.
The industrial environment is best monitored by reading technical
and trade journals of the respective industry. One of the common
surprises we have as we begin to work in a new industry for us is the
abundance of newspapers, reviews and newsletters that form part of
its information dissemination network. An inherent aspect of
developing a total monitoring process involves reviewing the
available information, ensuring that it is covered, and that
complicated information from that coverage systematically reaches
the organization for review and analysis.
Since there is no end to the changes that regularly occur in these four
environments, there is always the question of how this monitoring process
should be directed. Effective monitoring of the environment requires careful
attention to those issues that have a potentially high impact on the future
success of the organization. A simple way to approach the task of
establishing a useful environmental monitoring process is for the planning
team to systematically review each of the four areas and develop a broad list
of possible changes that could impact the organization. Each of these
potential changes must be ranked according to importance and probability.
Changes that will have high impact and are reasonably likely need careful
monitoring. Although the other areas should not be neglected, they may
receive a little less attention.
In summary, each of these four aspects of the environment needs special
attention during the strategic planning process. Although there will be
variation in the degree to which an organization needs to consider each
factor, every company should identify how and to what extent each of these
four aspects could impact its future plans. Categorizing how changes in any
of these environments can impact the organization over time, and carefully
recording the most important changes, is the essence of sound environmental
monitoring. Although it identifies a variety of internal and external factors,
the four broad areas form a useful starting point for understanding and
managing the process of observing the environment. However, the other
identified areas must be programmed within this monitoring process and
considered during strategic planning.
The most important decision related to monitoring the environment is which
of its important aspects should be monitored on a regular basis. One of the
positive consequences of strategic planning is determining the way in which
the organization monitors its environment and how said process can and
should be improved.
Organizations differ quite a bit in the way they focus their monitoring,
evidently as a function of the predominant driving forces that differentiate
the various organizations. For example, Procter & Gamble with marketing as
its first driving force dedicates most of its monitoring energy to the
competitive field, while WalMart with distribution as its first driving force
dedicates most of its monitoring energy to its internal environment
(inventories). , transportation and similar). The dashboard in WalMart's
corporate headquarters in Bensoville, Arkansas, probably looks more like
NASA's launch control center than a typical retail chain network, is
dedicated to recording the condition of WalMart's distribution system. .
5
Two lessons can be learned from observing the driving forces. The first is
that this individual set of criteria may prevent an organization from
adequately monitoring those areas that are outside its usual focus of
concentration. Depending on the validity of this lesson, some reorientation
of energy may be needed to successfully complete the strategic planning
process. The second lesson - a reflection of the first - is that monitoring the
company's environment reveals its predominant driving force, which also
represents useful information for the planning process.
7
who access the client's warehouses and therefore can provide us with
invaluable information about the client.
Observation is a stage of analysis that will later allow us to make decisions.
The higher the quality of the information collected, the more likely we are to
make the right decisions.
We will observe competing companies.
We will value our own company and its possibilities.
We will study our Clients carefully, the potential market and the target
market, those who have never thought of buying from us (non-Clients).
It is important to have the ability to listen to what the market tells us.
Remember that markets are conversations and it is essential that we
participate in the conversation.
One of the most important ways in which the applied strategic planning model
differs from other models is in its great interest in a deep involvement of the
process. For new involvement, three rules must be followed.
Large-scale involvement should begin as soon as possible.
Involvement must be practical and reach the maximum possible degree.
There should be as much participation as possible in making decisions about the
plan.
Obviously not all members of the organization can or should sit at the planning
table, but it is necessary for each of them to get involved in one way or another
as quickly as possible. Likewise, it must be done as soon as possible so as to The
achievements of the planning team will be applied.
Although the implementation phase constitutes the final step of the applied
strategic planning model, the application or implementation must take place
continuously throughout the strategic planning process as observed in chapter 5.
It is the mission statement for all relevant interest groups to make comments and
suggestions before it is accepted and no further planning should be undertaken
until there is consensus in implementation with the statement.
Establishing and maintaining involvement and tangible demonstrations of the
achievements of this phase of the planning process allows generating
information for the next.
The implementation phase involves the initiation of various action plans
designed at the single functional levels and their integration at the highest level
of the organization. This may involve, for example, evacuation, initiation of
development of our assets, technical training, increased research and
development, commercialization. of new products etc. the parts of the
organization must have a clear sense that exists at all levels will lead to the
successful completion of the organization's mission.
As the Strategic plan rolls out, the ways in which people have been involved in
the planning process must be made, given the length of the planning cycle and
the pressure of current operations. It would be easy for people to forget their
involvement and commitment. This must be allowed to happen.
Strategic plans that do not take sources into account will encounter problems
and may even fail.
The relationship that exists between organizational values and those of the
worker, known as value congruence, can range from a perfect fit between the
two to a state of conflict where the organization's values are opposite to the
worker's values. Authors explain that it must be possible to understand the
forms of congruence between organizational and individual values, so that
when there is no adjustment of values, conflict does not necessarily occur,
but there may be states of incongruence or misalignment of values.
The congruence of values allows us to understand how the organizational
culture will impact the worker, at the same time that it explains the way in
which workers affect the processes of organizational change. This impact of
value congruence is verified in terms of satisfaction and positive attitudes
towards work in cases of value adjustment, while in cases of conflict
situations of work stress and desires to leave the organization appear.
9
In this way, it is important to carry out studies on organizational culture
taking into account the context of the organization, specifically through the
analysis of the relationship between organizational values and the values of
workers as relevant elements within the components of culture. . For this
reason, the objective of this research was to identify differences between
private, public and mixed organizations based on the degree to which
personal and organizational values are related.
The first step in carrying out the search for values is an examination
of the personal values that characterize the members of the planning
team since values exist at both the individual and organizational
levels; Like the different segments of the organization, there needs to
be clarity regarding the level at which the evaluation is carried out.
The first aspect of the search must take place at the individual level.
It is particularly important that the key decision-makers in a company
10
are clear about their personal values and recognize the differences
between them. If any of these key individuals are not members of
the planning team, then assessing their values should be part of the
values search.
There are several important reasons to begin searching for values at
a personal level, one of which is that differences in personal values
among members of the planning team will impact the course of
strategic planning. As you can see internally, the values about your
sensitive issues such as risk taking, profitability and growth are at the
core of the strategic planning process. They will have an impact on
the course of strategic planning. Values about your critical issues
such as risk taking, profitability and growth are at the core of the
strategic planning process.
The most direct and effective technique for surfacing personal values
is to ask each member of the planning team to fill out a simple values
questionnaire. The consultant can then calculate the range and
average of these scores and record them. Ask the group to
characterize themselves according to these dimensions. Generally,
the members will begin to share their individual scores, analyze the
meaning and implication of these in their own behavior and the
impact of these on the group.
11
person, you should not pigeonhole yourself into that type of
triangular relationship.
What values do you want this company to adopt and use in its
decision making?
13
of an organization includes a series of assumptions about the way
processes work and the way decisions are made. These assumptions
in the sector in charge of generating profits include profits when
doing business with the government. or allowing the union to
organize our hourly production staff destroys the company in the
non-profit sector, the typical presumptions if we don't spend all of
this year's budget will remember next year and has to continue if it
wants to progress.
Some general assumptions are:
That the growth of the organization is assured by a large population
or that there will never be a satisfactory substitute for the company's
most important product or service. Unless these assumptions are
examined in terms of their current validity and relevance, the
company will continue to assume that they are true. and will operate
in accordance with them, in fact an important part of the strategic
planning process consists of identifying the assumptions that will be
made in the organization about its environment, its markets, its
operations and how the processes work or should work in order to
examine their validity, An important part of the strategic planning
process consists of creating an explicit operations philosophy
because this becomes the vehicle for disseminating the organization's
values both internally and externally.
Likewise, the strategic plan must be based on the company's
operations philosophy or it is necessary to modify the philosophy in
order for the strategic plan to adjust. There is no simple and direct
way for an organization to produce an explicit operations philosophy.
If you do not have one often, it is useful for the strategic planning
team to try to develop one as part of their work by using examples
such as Johnson and Mars, it is useful for the strategic planning
consultant to keep a record of the various organizational functions
found during the initial work with the organization and at appropriate
times during the planning process, present them as topics for the
planning group to analyze their truth or falsity and determine whether
there is agreement or disagreement.
Organizations often make unproven assumptions about their market
competence, compensation programs for exempt and non-exempt
workers, the role of government, problems with unionization, etc.
Although raising these concerns for a reasonable analysis is a
difficult and anxiety-inducing task for the consultant, it represents an
important part of the strategic planning process.
Heroes
15
High-performing organizations have a variety of rites and
rituals as part of their deep-rooted culture, and these must be
identified as part of the strategic planning process.
cultural network
The final step of the search for values is the analysis of interest groups. By
interest groups we mean those individuals, groups and organizations that will
receive the impact of the strategic plan or that may possibly be interested in
it in the organization's planning process. It includes all those who consider,
correctly or incorrectly, that they have an interest in the business cycle and
not exclusively. Those who are not removed from planning consider that
they have a reasonable or legitimate right to said interest. It is necessary to
identify each of these interest groups and determine how likely they are to
correspond to the plan, the planning process, and the implementation of the
plan.
In this analysis, the values presupposed by the different interest groups and
their respective resources, status, freedom of action, relationships and
activities that may be affected by changes and modifications in the strategic
direction of the organization must be taken into account. However, given the
diversity of interests of these groups, it will never be possible to satisfy them
all; Rather, those interests must be evaluated and considered in terms of the
consequences of satisfying them or not. This evaluation will reduce surprises
that could otherwise have an impact on the strategic planning process and its
implementation.
This analysis should provide the planning team with a model for
understanding and meeting the different expectations of the various
interest groups during the course of the planning process. For
example, a planning team considered its relationships with suppliers
18
as stakeholders and concluded that its suppliers wanted an ongoing
session characterized by the open communication, mutual respect,
and appreciation that partners could provide for each other. This
generated a fundamental change in the company's relationship with
its suppliers; In the new relationship, the Cisnero company
negotiated with its suppliers in the same way it hoped to do with its
customers.
19
SUMMARY
The applied strategic planning model consists of nine consecutive steps (or phases) plus
two continuous steps: monitoring the environment and considerations for its application.
Environmental monitoring is generally needed to provide information to the company
during daily work and, in particular, to provide that information to the planning team at
each consecutive step.
Environment Monitoring
All organizations have a vital need to record what is happening, or what is about to
happen, in their environments.
Most companies do it poorly and unconsciously, even when it is done well, the
information collected is not used for the development of alternative futures.
Strategic planning requires that a company take the time to seriously examine how it
monitors the environments that have a direct impact on its future and how it processes
the information it obtains.
Continuous data should provide information to the planning team and the entire
company about what is happening, and the possibility of something happening that
could affect the company's normal operations, its planning process, and its future. .
Environment monitoring process and scope
The first is related to the types of information obtained and the way it should be used
(facts, hypotheses, intuitions, assumptions and others). The second aspect is related to
the effectiveness of the system for compiling, storing, processing, integrating and
disseminating information from the environment belonging to the organization.
20
The information must identify emerging opportunities and threats in the external
environment. Then, identify your strengths and weaknesses to respond to these
opportunities and threats.
Then, identify your strengths and weaknesses to respond to these opportunities and
threats. In addition, the environmental monitoring process must bring to light a variety
of important factors, both internal and external to the organization, that to date have
been overlooked but that must be considered as part of the strategic planning process.
One of them, Nasbiu (1982), identified the following emerging trends that will
transform our lives, especially our organizational lives:
1. The change from an industrial society to a society characterized by information
technology.
2. The development of a high-tech, high-touch requirement
3. A change from national to global economy.
4. A shift from short-term to long-term thinking, management and planning.
5. A shift from centralization to decentralization.
6. The resurgence of self-help to replace institutional help
7. A shift from representative democracy to participatory democracy
21
8. A shift from hierarchical forms of administration towards network
interconnection.
9. In the US, the development of the south as a center of energy and organizational
life.
10. A shift toward seeking multiple options rather than leaning toward any
alternative solution.
The internal environment . Among the factors to consider as part of the internal
organizational environment are changes in the company's structure, its culture, its
climate, its productivity and its distinctive strengths and weaknesses.
Monitoring the environment and driving forces, organizations differ quite a bit in the
way they concentrate their monitoring. For example, Procter & Gamble with marketing
22
as its first driving force dedicates most of its monitoring energy to the competitive field,
while WalMart with distribution as its first driving force dedicates most of its
monitoring energy to its internal environment (inventories). , transportation and
similar).
Two lessons can be learned from observing the driving forces. The first is that this
individual set of criteria may prevent an organization from adequately monitoring those
areas that are outside its usual focus of concentration. The second lesson - a reflection of
the first - is that monitoring the company's environment reveals its predominant driving
force, which also represents useful information for the planning process.
In order to create some order to this chaotic condition, Aaker (1983) recommended that
companies use a Strategic Information Search System (SBIE). This is a simple, formal,
five-step system.
1. Identify the information needs of the company, especially for the next phase of
strategic planning.
2. generate a list of information sources that provide essential data (for example,
trade shows, publications, technical meetings, and customers)
23
Organizational values are a key element by which the people who collaborate
and the employees who work together are governed in order to obtain the same
objective. It can be for a company, company or an institution where the
organizational values are effective and thus the members of the group They must
exercise them based on their own convictions and not by establishments where
each person has to be sure that they act under the rules of conduct that can
benefit both them and the rest of the group.
The relationship that exists between organizational values and those of the worker,
known as value congruence, can range from a perfect fit between the two to a state of
conflict where the organization's values are opposite to the worker's values. Authors
explain that it must be possible to understand the forms of congruence between
organizational and individual values, so that when there is no adjustment of values,
conflict does not necessarily occur, but there may be states of incongruence or
misalignment of values.
The decisions they will make, the goals, the objectives and everything they must do to
reach what they most want are according to the values of each person. Something
similar happens in the organization, it is essential to determine the values since these
constitute the path and the rules to respect to obtain the best possible results. The values
will allow better management of resources and maximum efficiency to obtain the
expected results; For this reason, it is necessary to carry out a prior analysis of the
personal values that make up the organization in order to determine which values will
constitute those of the entire organization.
Organizational values: These are the desired values of the entire organization, that is,
given the personal values of the members who make up the planning team.
If the search for values identifies desired values in a segment of the organization that are
incongruent with those of other segments, this difference must be addressed
immediately, it is essential to have a certain degree of value articulation and some
resolution of strong differences in regarding values, in order to achieve a successful
strategic planning process.
When a planning team arrives at a solution about the organization's values, the
information must be disseminated to the rest of the organization.
24
Integrate the values of the organization into the way business is carried out. Some
organizations have explicit and formal statements of philosophy as values.
Heroes, the Heroes of an organization are those people who embody the company's
values and upon whom they are woven, they are the organizational members who serve
as clear role models for others and summarize the unique character of an organization.
Rites and Rituals, The rites and rituals of an organization are the ceremonies and other
scheduled routines that help define the company's expectations regarding employees, a
company that entertains career workers for their time with the company with
recognition and badges for every five years of connection that they proudly display, is
quite different from those that do not pay attention to the length of service and barely
reward their best salespeople and other important performers and these are differences
from companies that have rites and rituals, For both aspects these symbolic acts say a lot
about the organization and need to be observed carefully.
The culture of an organization provides the social context in which and through which it
performs its work, guides its members in making decisions, how time and energy are
invested, formal evaluation of the organization's current culture and its potential impact
on the implementation of the strategic plan is executed as part of the performance audit
and gap analysis phases of the applied strategic planning process.
Analysis of the organization's culture is also useful to surface issues that may interfere
with the strategic planning process itself.
Interest groups: individuals, groups and organizations that will receive the impact of the
strategic plan or that may possibly be interested in it in the planning process of the
organization. This analysis must take into account the values that the different interest
groups and their respective groups presuppose. resources, status, freedom of action,
relationships and activities that may be affected by changes and modifications in the
strategic direction of the organization.
By identifying the various interest groups we will understand the values of these groups.
By examining evident stakeholder behaviors over time and supporting the underlying
values that these behaviors represent.
25
CONCLUSIONS
Without a doubt, companies are totally dependent on their environments, but
above all it is important to highlight that the company-environment relationship
must exist at all times, since its success and, above all, its participation in the
market it serves will depend on it.
In strategic planning it is important to monitor the organization's environments,
in order to allow us to know what type of competitors we have; Knowing how
the internal environment is, since through this aspect we can know how
customers perceive the organization since the success of the company will
depend on this.
It is an enormous challenge for an organization to seriously “work” on its
values, which adds to the daily challenges that the market presents. However,
deciding to invest time and resources in this task results in the creation of a
strong company, in which its members achieve their objectives more efficiently
and satisfactorily and feel united and motivated to be part of it.
For an adequate search for values for the organization, teamwork is necessary, as
well as actively obtaining everyone's participation, because this will help
determine the values for the organization more easily.
Organizational values not only influence work environment situations but are
also definitive in areas as varied as competitiveness strategies, creation of
services for our clients, work relationships, innovation processes or investment
decisions, which is why they need to have meaning. practical so as not to
become good intentions published in a table but rather contain a clear practical
usefulness for all members and for this it is necessary to make them known.
The role of companies in society has evolved enormously, largely due to the
“pressure” of different interest groups that gain weight and influence in the
decisions and the future of the company itself without a good analysis of the
interest groups. Any strategic planning will not have an effect on an
organization.
26