1 s2.0 S2212827118309247 Main
1 s2.0 S2212827118309247 Main
1 s2.0 S2212827118309247 Main
com
ScienceDirect
Procedia CIRP 74 (2018) 485–490
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
Abstract
Direct butt joining of pure titanium to 316L stainless steel with continuous Yb:YAG laser was performed with variation of the beam offset from
joint line. Mechanical properties of samples were evaluated by tensile tests and three-point flexural tests. The fractured surfaces and cross
sections of welds were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD).
Tensile properties of welds were strongly determined by the beam offset from joint line and are well described by Weibull statistics. Ultimate
tensile strength of 174 69 MPa and ultimate flexural strength of 297 48 MPa were obtained. Brittle fracture took place in the diffusive
interface rich in and FeTi phases.
© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Peer-review under responsibility of the Bayerisches Laserzentrum GmbH.
2212-8271 © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Peer-review under responsibility of the Bayerisches Laserzentrum GmbH.
10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.138
This is a resupply of March 2023 as the template used in the publication of the original article contained errors. The content of the article has remained unaffected.
486 Antoine Mannucci et al. / Procedia CIRP 74 (2018) 485–490
possibility of direct laser welding of titanium with stainless Microstructure and local composition of cross sections and
steel in butt configuration. The offset of the laser beam away of fracture surfaces were studied with SEM JEOL with EDS
from the joint interface allowed the progressive suppression analyzer. Fracture surfaces underwent XRD analysis with
of materials mixing associated with the reduction of brittle PANalytical X’Pert PRO using a Co target. Scanning range of
intermetallic zones. The best result was obtained with beam 40−120° with a step scan of 0.0167° and counting time of
offset on the steel side: the formation of about 30 µm thick 200 s per step were used.
reactive interface between solid titanium and melted zone, Tensile tests were carried out at room temperature, with the
composed by FeTi + α-Ti and FeTi + 1 + Ti5Fe17Cr5 layers, MTS Insight 30 kN tensile test machine, at cross head speed
allowed to enhance joint UTS up to 150 MPa. of 5 mm/min. Flexure tests were made with MTS Insight
In the present study, the effect of beam offset towards 50 kN at cross head speed of 5 mm/min and with a loading
titanium alloy on composition, microstructure, tensile edge diameter of 1.5 mm.
properties and fracture mode of titanium/stainless steel joints
welded with continuous Yb:YAG laser is explored. 3. Results and discussion
This is a resupply of March 2023 as the template used in the publication of the original article contained errors. The content of the article has remained unaffected.
Antoine Mannucci et al. / Procedia CIRP 74 (2018) 485–490 487
Zones in
layers 1 and 2
A
This is a resupply of March 2023 as the template used in the publication of the original article contained errors. The content of the article has remained unaffected.
488 Antoine Mannucci et al. / Procedia CIRP 74 (2018) 485–490
(Fig. 5). For = 0.42 mm, many samples broke during the
cutting. This evolution corresponds to the progressive a 1,0
reduction of brittle zone dimensions (Fig.4) followed by the b 1,5
ln(ln(1/Ps))
lack of fusion for the highest . The highest ultimate strength
Survival probability
was observed for 0.32 mm beam offset: 174±69 MPa for 0,8 0
tensile test and 297±48 MPa for flexion test. -1,5
The welds with = 0.27-0.37 mm showed high ultimate 0,6
tensile strength, but also the widest dispersion between -3
individual values (Fig.5a). Data dispersion was more constant 0,4 4 4,25 4,5 4,75
for flexure tests (Fig.5b), which can be attributed to a less ln(UTS)
brutal crack propagation. The ultimate strength of brittle 0,2
materials is usually determined by the size of the biggest
defect that is statistic. This results in dispersion of UTS values 0,0
for the welds performed in the same condition [14]. Such 0 100 200 300
behavior is well described by Weibull formula (equation 1) UTS (MPa)
0.17 0.22
[15]: Δ (mm) 0.27 0.32
0.37 0.42
V T
m
PS (V0 ) exp (1)
V0 0
Fig.6. (a)Weibull curves for tensile tests, (b) linearized curve for Δ=0.22 mm.
a 300
200
UTS (MPa)
175
144
100 110
68 78
0 14
0,15 0,2 0,25 0,3 0,35 0,4 0,45
(mm)
400
b
300 297
271 267
UFS (MPa)
254
200 213
170 Fig. 7. The topography of fracture surfaces on the stainless steel side of the
100 welds with (a) =0.32 mm and (b) = 0.17 mm.
0
0,15 0,2 0,25 0,3 0,35 0,4 0,45 3.4. Fractography
(mm)
Fig. 5: The effect of beam offset on average (a) tensile and (b) flexure Fracture surfaces reveal the periodical fluctuation of
ultimate strength of the joints. 316L/MZ interface each 2.5 mm. Such periodical fluctuation
may be caused by the unsteady behavior of the liquid zone.
All survival probability curves (Fig.6 a) have characteristic This periodicity makes it difficult to establish an accurate
form of Weibull curve, but with different parameters correlation between tensile properties and interface
depending on beam offset. Additional experimental values dimensions.
will be necessary for the accurate determination of 0 and m. The observation of stainless steel side of the fracture
These parameters can be calculated with the help of provides rich information about fracture propagation in
ln(ln(1/Ps)) = f(ln(UTS)) linearization. The concave form of different areas of dissimilar interface. For >0.17 mm, flat
the curve allows supposing the possibility of threshold zone is observed in the center of the interface, which
behavior (Fig. 6.b). corresponds to the fracture between stainless steel side and
When the beam offset is important (0.42 mm), the fracture unmelted titanium layer (Fig.7.a). Top and bottom parts of the
suffers from a lack of fusion that explains the catastrophic fractured surface have a coarse aspect due to the fluctuation of
decrease of tensile properties. With a decrease of , the MZ limit and the propagation of the fracture between different
continuous reactive interface develops more and more, which layers of dissimilar interface and the MZ. For = 0.17 mm,
increases the survival probability of the samples. However, the unmelted titanium layer has almost dissolved and the
for the offsets0.27 mm, the progressive decrease of tensile fracture presents a very rough aspect (Fig.7.b) with coarse
strength is determined by the increase of defects sizes cleavages at the top and the bottom of the weld.
This is a resupply of March 2023 as the template used in the publication of the original article contained errors. The content of the article has remained unaffected.
Antoine Mannucci et al. / Procedia CIRP 74 (2018) 485–490 489
Table 5. Relative XRD pic intensity of different phases, SS side and Ti side,
illustrated with highest standalone peaks for each phase.
UTS
(Ti) FeTi (Fe) -Fe
(MPa) (mm)
2: 53.2 55.8 69.9 73.2 98.7 111.4
Stainless steel side
64 0.17 13 4 6 6 6 37
97 0.22 10 4 14 9 7 64
74 0.27 6 3 19 10 4 72
Fig. 8. Schematic representation of different zones present at stainless steel 260 0.27 7 2 18 8 4 69
side of the fracture: (a) Δ = 0.37 mm, (b) Δ = 0.27 mm, (c) Δ = 0.17 mm. 54 0.32 7 0 16 9 4 83
115 0.32 7 0 13 8 4 70
The fractured surfaces of the welds with offset 0.37 mm 259 0.32 5 3 11 6 4 86
305 0.32 5 3 12 7 3 88
(Fig. 8.a) present periodical areas with absence of interaction 43 0.37 3 0 12 6 0 100
(F1) that increase with the beam offset. These zones are 159 0.37 3 0 11 5 3 93
surrounded with belts (F2) where the fracture occurred in a 61 0.42 4 0 11 5 0 94
very thin layer 1. Here the dissimilar interface is thin enough UTS
to observe unmelted stainless steel. At the top and bottom of (MPa) (mm) (Ti) FeTi -Ti -Ti
2: 53.2 55.8 69.9 73.2 46.1 46.9
dissimilar interface, the little zones with fracture involving a Titanium side
well-developed layer 1 and layer 2 (F3) are present. In the 64 0.17 6 0 9 8 0 0
rest of the dissimilar interface, the fracture involves a well- 97 0.22 6 2 14 8 2 21
developed layer 1 or occurs between layer 1 and unmelted 74 0.27 6 2 15 8 7 33
stainless steel (F4). 260 0.27 5 0 14 7 4 35
54 0.32 3 2 16 7 11 65
For beam offsets between 0.37mm and 0.22 mm (Fig.8.b), 115 0.32 3 2 17 9 3 24
the zones with absence of fusion (F1) are no longer present 259 0.32 4 0 14 7 7 48
and are replaced with zones F2 neighboring with F4. The zone 305 0.32 4 1 14 6 8 59
43 0.37 2 1 15 5 8 79
F3 forms two belts at the top and at the bottom of dissimilar 159 0.37 3 1 12 5 10 76
interface. 61 0.42 3 0 10 6 11 100
XRD analysis of fracture surfaces (Fig. 9 and Table 5)
shows a smooth evolution of relative peak intensity in The peaks (Ti) phase that dominates in the layer 1, are
function of the beam offset. The -Fe and -Ti are the main the most important after those of bulk materials, and their
peaks observed on stainless steel and titanium side of the intensity follows the same tendency that was observed for
fracture respectively. With an increase of , -Fe gains in average UTS values, with maximum for =0.27-0.32 mm.
intensity because of the increase of the zones F1, F2 and F4, The peak intensities of FeTi phase that can be found in layer 1
where the fracture partially involves unmelted stainless steel, as well as in layer 2, diminish for beam offsets > 0.32 mm,
and because of diminution of layer 1 between unmelted which corresponds to the development of the zones with a
stainless steel and Ti. lack of interaction. Metastable -Ti phase that contains
-Ti peak also gains in intensity with increasing for the approximately 95 %at. Ti and 5 %at. Cr, was observed only
same reason: unmelted Ti layer becomes revealed because of on the titanium side of the fracture.
reduction of layer 1 and the lack of interaction between 316L The intensity of peaks of individual samples does not
and unmelted Ti layer. always correlate with their UTS value, which confirms
The peak intensities of and (Fe) phases associated probabilistic fracture determined by the maximum size of
with layer 2, diminish with the beam offset. Low intensity defects situated in the interfacial layers irrespectively of their
peak of ternary phase does not show a significant tendency. composition (for example beam offset of 0.32 mm).
(Fe) can form on solid stainless steel side under the effect
of Ti diffusion or appear during the solidification of eutectics
of +(Fe).
This is a resupply of March 2023 as the template used in the publication of the original article contained errors. The content of the article has remained unaffected.
490 Antoine Mannucci et al. / Procedia CIRP 74 (2018) 485–490
4. Conclusion References
1. Appropriate laser beam offset on the titanium side [1] Okamoto H. Fe-Ti Iron-Titanium. J Phase Equilib 1996; 17:369.
[2] Tomashchuk I, Sallamand P. Metallurgical strategies for the joining of
allows reducing the formation of brittle intermetallic phases to titanium alloys with steels. Adv Eng Mater, 2018:
several 10 µm thin interface on the limit between stainless https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700764.
steel and the melted zone. The thickness of this interface is [3] Kamachi Mudali U, Ananda Rao BM, Shanmugam K, Natarajan R,
not uniform because of the hourglass shape of the welds and Baldev R. Corrosion and microstructural aspects of dissimilar joints of
titanium and type 304L stainless steel. J Nucl Mater 2003; 321:40-48.
the presence of unmelted Ti layer. However, the relation [4] Kahraman N, Gülenç B, Findik F. Joining of titanium/stainless steel by
between the beam offset and the maximal thickness of the explosive welding and effect on interface. J Mater Process Technol
reaction layer can be established. The interface is composed 2005; 169:127-133.
by two layers with complex microstructure: Ti+FeTi+1 [5] Fazel-Najafabadi M, Kashani-Bozorg SF, Zarei-Hanzaki A. Joining of
CP-Ti to 304 stainless steel using friction stir welding technique. Mater
and FeTi+1+. Des 2010; 31:4800-4807.
2. Tensile and flexure behavior of the welds can be [6] Ishida K, Gao Y, Nagatsuka K, Takahashi M, Nakata K.
described by Weibull statistics, related with the development Microstructures and mechanical properties of friction stir welded lap
of statistic cracks in intermetallic layers. The best average joints of commercially pure titanium and 304 stainless steel. J Alloys
Compd 2015; 630:172-177.
tensile and flexure strength were 174±69 and 297±48 MPa [7] Sun Z, Ion JC. Laser welding of dissimilar metal combinations. J Mater
respectively for beam offset of 0.32 mm. Sci 1995; 30:4205-4214.
3. The analysis of fracture surfaces revealed a complex [8] Tomashchuk I, Sallamand P, Andrzejewski H, Grevey D. Dissimilar
mode of fracture determined by the local development of laser welding of AISI 316L stainless steel to Ti6–Al4–6V alloy via pure
vanadium interlayer. Mater Sci Eng 2015; 622:37-45.
intermetallic layers. The welds with a too high beam offset [9] Shanmugarajan B, Padmanabham G. Fusion welding studies using laser
suffer from a lack of fusion at mid-height, whereas the welds on Ti–SS dissimilar combination. Opt Las Engineer 2012; 50:1621-
with a too low beam offset break in thick intermetallic zones 1627.
[10] Satoh G, Yao Y, Qiu C. Strength and microstructure of laser fusion-
and even in the embrittled melted zone, which has a negative
welded Ti–SS dissimilar material pair. Internat J Adv Manuf Technol
consequence on their strength. 2013; 66:469-479.
4. Additional investigation is necessary for an accurate [11] Chen HC, Bi G, Lee BY, Cheng CK. Laser welding of CP Ti to
description of tensile behavior of the welds in light of Weibull stainless steel with different temporal pulse shapes. J Mater Process
Technol 2016; 231:58-65.
statistics, as well as NDE tests to understand if the micro-
[12] Chen S, Zhang M, Huang J, Cui C, Zhang H, Zhao X. Microstructures
cracks appear immediately after the welding or during cutting and mechanical property of laser butt welding of titanium alloy to
process. stainless steel. Mater Des 2014; 53:504-511.
5. Further work on numerical simulation will allow better [13] Ivanchenko V, Pryadko T. Chromium - Iron – Titanium. In: Effenberg
G, Ilyenko S, editors. Ternary alloy systems Landolt-Börnstein - Group
understanding of the relation between operational parameters,
IV Physical Chemistry. Berlin:Springer; 2008. p. 365-381.
resulting thermal fields and the local thickness of intermetallic [14] Ashby MF, Jones DRH. Probabilistic fracture of brittle materials. In:
layer. Engineering materials 4th ed. Boston: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann;
2012. p. 219-228.
Acknowledgements [15] Tomashchuk I, Sallamand P, Duband M, Laser assisted brazing of
titanium to aluminum alloy. Proc COMSOL conf, Grenoble, 2015.
[16] Métais A, Matteï S, Tomashchuk I, Gaied S, Modeling of transport
This work was carried out as a part of joint laboratory phenomena in laser welding of steels. Proc COMSOL conf, Grenoble,
project LabCom FLAMme between Laboratoire 2015.
Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne, University of [17] Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J
Bourgogne-Franche-Comté and SME Laser Rhône-Alpes. Appl mech 1951; 18:293-297.
This project was funded by French National Agency of [18] Murray JL. The Cr-Ti system. Bull Alloy Phase Diagrams 1981; 2:174-
Research. 181.
[19] Liao J, Yamamoto N, Liu N, Nakata K. Microstructure at friction stir
lap joint interface of pure titanium and steel. Mater Lett 2010; 64:2317-
2320.
This is a resupply of March 2023 as the template used in the publication of the original article contained errors. The content of the article has remained unaffected.