Logic
Logic
SCIENCE
Unit objective:
V Apply natural logic in solving problems in
everyday life.
V Determine the scientific nature of logic.
V Define logic as the science of the laws of thought.
Aim:
{ Apply natural logic in solving life's problems
2
Interpreting SAYINGS is an activity
logic too, some examples are:
1) " EYE LOVE IS BORN".
9
3.Find the word hidden in the circle. There is no
indication of reading direction or what the first
letter is.
Solution: The missing letter is R, and it is read counterclockwise starting
from the letter S
SALT
1.2 Definition of logic as a science.
Aim:
Adequately define Logic, knowing its history and analyzing the factors of
thought.
Example:
The blackboard is green: affirmative
judgment
The blackboard is not
green: negative judgment JI
In symbols : S is P and S is not
1
2
P, respectively
1
3
V A more complete definition of Logic is:
1
4
Other definitions
V Logic is the science of demonstration, since it
is only concerned with formulating rules to
achieve truths through demonstration.
• Logic is the part that teaches the method to
reach the truth.
v Logic is the science of the necessary laws of
understanding and reason.
V Logic is the science of the pure idea, of the idea
in the abstract element of thought
1
5
1.3 HISTORY
TRADITIONAL LOGIC
{ Aristotle (384-322 BC): as a systematic discipline
traditional logic). Study the forms of judgments (A, E,
I, O).
MODERN LOGIC.
V Francis Bacon (1561-1626): Novum Organum, logic
traditional
{ 19th – 20th century, modern logic (symbolic logic, logic
mathematics, logistics)
1
6
edition. mcgraw-hill, mexico 2004 .
1
7
1.4 Thought factors
They are the elements that concur (participate) in the very
phenomenon of thought.
Subject objective
Object
ive thinking
thinkin 1
8
C. Object (content). It is what is thought, it is also called
ontological factor (relative to the objects or entities of
thought) and this is not studied by Logic.
1
9
1.5 THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE
(EPISTEMOLOGY)
GREEK Items:
epistemology •Subject.
Gnosis:
(theory of Knowledge •Object.
Knowledge) Logos: study •Relationship
between them
2
0
What does knowledge consist of?
To answer this, there are aspects to consider:
1. Possibility of knowledge:
a. Dogmatism . It establishes that consciousness is
capable of knowing reality as it is without restriction.
Find absolute truths. The promoters are: Plato,
Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz, Wolf, etc.
b. Skepticism . It establishes that knowledge is not
possible due to subjective, environmental limitations,
etc. The beginning is doubt in the search for truth.
Some followers: ٠ Pyrrho of Elis (Greek) ٠
Michael de Montaigne and David
Hume
2
1
c. Subjectivism . He states that knowledge is only possible in a
limited way (Oswald Spengler, Europe), it is limited or
depends on the time and the environment. It also depends on
the subject you know.
d. Pragmatism . It agrees with dogmatism only that it
establishes that what is true is only what is USEFUL. In
addition to being useful, it is also beneficial. Some analysts
are:
William James and John Dewey (USA)
Friedrich Nietzsche.(Germany)
e. Criticism . Intermediate between dogmatism and skepticism.
It was founded by Emmanuel Kant (German). You cannot
know the thing in itself; just the phenomenon.
Examines the claims of the human form (a priori knowledge).
He is reflective and critical, he orders and knows.
Personal task: investigate more deeply about philosophical currents
and how they understand knowledge. The bibliography to consult
can be:
• Leiva Chacón, Danilo Antonio. Notions of Mathematical Logic: First Steps. 1st
edition. El Salvador, UFG Editores, 2006. ISBN 99923-47-07-4 (TEXT)
• Gustavo Escobar Valenzuela. Logic, notions and applications. 2nd. Edition. McGraw
-Hill, Mexico 2004.
"88 18
2
3
2. Origin of knowledge
Reason
Knowledge Experience
a) Rationalism. All authentic knowledge is based on reason. According
to rationalism, knowledge is valid when it is universal and
necessary.
b) It refers to the mental systems that explain the sciences in
logical terms; It is the sum of the sensible with the concepts
(reality). Use of reason or mental faculties. Discernment.
Precursors:
Ancient M odern
٠ Parmenides of Elea (Greek) ٠Descartes, Spinoza,
٠ Plato and his teacher Socrates (Greeks) Leibniz (mathematicians)
b) Empiricism. It is based on experience through the senses.
And he affirms that the origins of knowledge are
found in experience.
PRECURSORS:
Sophists: Callicles and Ancient
Pythagoras 1 Philosophers:
Epicureans and Stoics J
Locke and David Hume modern
John Stuart Mill (high
representative)
2
5
3. The problem of the essence of
knowledge.
to. The
realism . Reality is independent of consciousness. It is the
conformity of the judgment with reality.
2
7
4. The problem of the forms of knowledge.
What are you wondering:
{ In what ways do we know?
{ How many forms of knowledge can we distinguish?
There are two forms of knowledge.
a. Discursive knowledge: it is the best known or common form,
it is acquired MEDIATELY through logical operations (in
stages). It is characteristic of the sciences.
2
8
b. Intuitive knowledge : provides knowledge of things by
IMMEDIATE apprehension of the objects of knowledge.
Rational Reason
Guys
of Emotional Feeling
intuition Volitional Willpower
Example:
■ Rational intuition. To grasp the essence.
Emotional intuition. Capture the values
Volitional Intuition. Know the problems that exist
2
9
Types of Knowledge Objects that
intuition body accept Examples
Rational The reason Essences Understand the essence of a
triangle as a closed 3-sided
figure
Emotional He Values Capturing the value of a brave
feeling action: Pedro helps his friend fall
from the stands
Volitional The will Existential Mike understands or senses that
the meaning of his existence lies
in personal improvement
Reflections:
• Plato: ideas are intuited by reason.
• Saint Augustine: eternal truth, God himself, is given through
emotional intuition.
• Henri Bergson (1859-1941): intuition is the most accurate knowledge
to reach the essence of things. 24
> FORMAL TRUTH AND MATERIAL TRUTH.
Reality
3 . The essence The realism independent of the
awareness
of
knowledge There is no reality
Idealism unconscient
Comes from
logical operations
4. Forms of Rational (Reason).
knowledge Emotional (feeling).
Volitional (will) 2 . 7
1.6 LOGIC AND OTHER SCIENCES
For Aristotle: Logic is an instrument for the sciences.
The sciences use the general structures and functions of thought
for investigative work, some relationships are the following: •
Definitions.
• Classifications.
• Divisions.
• Affirmation relationships.
• Denial relationships.
• Inclusion relationships.
• Exclusion relations.
• Conditionality relationships.
• Unconditional relationships.
• Demonstration relations, etc.
3
6
The related sciences
a) The Psychology:
“Logical Psychologism” makes logic depend on
psychology. Theodor Lipps says: knowing occurs in the
psyche and thinking is a psychological fact.
Logic is related to Psychology because thought is generated
in the brain and different parts intervene with their specific
functions.
3
7
b) The grammar:
The correct use of words and
their meaning allows science to better
study scientific methods.
Logic is related to Grammar
because it indicates the ways in which
thought is expressed: written, oral and
physical.
Grammaticism makes Logic depend on
Grammar.
Grammar studies words and their linguistic structure.
Thought is closely linked to language.
4
0
1.7 Laws of thought (supreme
logical principles)
4
1
2. The principle of non-contradiction (Aristotle).
“It is impossible for something to be and not to be at the
same time and in the same sense”
“It is impossible for A to be B and not be B at the same
time” An object or being cannot be two things at the
same time.
It is not possible for an object to be a book and not be,
at the same time, a book
Example:
On the logical level: two mutually contradictory
judgments cannot both be true.
“All men are mortal” (True)
“Some men are not mortal ” (False)
4
2
3. The principle of the excluded third (Aristotle).
4
3
•to
4
4
> Examples:
V “The square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the
legs for some reason.”
The reason is given in the proof of the Pythagorean theorem.